In my book Global Warming - The Great Deception, I refute all of the pseudoscience employed by the proponents of the fraudulent global warming hypothesis, using proven first principles of science in the disciplines of,
Peer-reviewed, published scientific research demonstrates that the world's temperature databases for the lower atmosphere, land mass, and oceans depict virtually,
Since 1979, NOAA satellites using microwave sounding technology have measured an increase in the average temperature anomaly of the lower troposphere (first 8 km of the Earth's atmosphere) of only 0.13°C/decade, or 0.013°C/yr.
Since 2000, when NOAA inaugurated the Argo Float Program, the temperature of the world's oceans has reportedly increased by 0.02°C/decade, or 0.002°C/yr.
NOAA reports that the temperature of the Earth's land mass has increased by 2°F during the period 1880-2020, an increase of 0.014°F/yr., during a time when thermometers were graduated in 1, 3 and 5°F.
Arguably, all of these measurements are within the measurement margin of error.
The concept of an average temperature of the Earth is an abstraction - a figment of the climate scientist's imagination, conjured up in an effort to prove a fraudulent hypothesis...
The Earth is never in thermal equilibrium; the temperature of the Earth is different at every point in time and space.
The average temperature of the Earth has no meaning in scientific analysis:
To set a goal for man to limit the increase in the "average temperature" of the Earth to 1.5°C over any period of time is folly.
Temperature is a proxy
for the average kinetic energy of the molecules in a system. Man has
no more control over the climate of the Earth than the forces of
It declared that if the world continued to emit CO2 at the then current rate,
The publicly available
temperature data above prove that prediction to be false...
Then, in a further nod to the left wing of the Democrat party, on December 8, 2021, he signed an executive order that set a goal of,
In 2021, 60% of the electricity produced in the U.S. came from fossil-powered plants, 20% from nuclear plants, and 20% from renewable energy sources.
Wind and solar energy production in 2021 accounted for 13% of the total electrical energy output.
While it may be possible to increase the capacity of wind and solar electrical production in the next 5-10 years, the big problem remains the,
They are vulnerable to changes in weather (clouds obstruct sunshine, and the wind does not blow) as well as extreme weather events, as the recent experience in Texas demonstrates.
Permitting nuclear power plants, remains a challenge.
On Feb. 9, 2012, the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted to permit the first nuclear
power plant to be built in the U.S. in over 30 years, over the
objections of its chairman, who voiced safety concerns.
Such a mandate would require a rapid increase in wind and solar plant construction and operation, and fossil fuel generation would still be required to serve as a back-up when renewable energy sources fail.
Those fossil fuel plants that remained in operation would be required to purchase carbon credits to offset emissions to achieve 100% carbon-free operations.
But CO2 emissions will not be reduced by buying carbon credits.
It is the height of
naïveté to think our economic competitors in the world like
China and India will wreck their economies based on a
fraudulent global warming hypothesis...