by Dr. Joseph Mercola
2022, another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents were released
by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer trial data
reveal natural immunity was as effective as the jab, and
that shot side effects were more severe in those under 55.
Since the risk of severe COVID is dramatically lower in
younger people, an elevated risk of side effects
unacceptable, and the shot should have been restricted to
those at high risk of severe COVID
adverse event rate per dose for Pfizer's mRNA jab, based on
their own studies, is nearly 1 in 800, and the myocarditis
rate is 10 in 100,000 - far greater than the 2 in 100,000
rate previously reported
consent form specifies that the effect on sperm, fetuses and
nursing children are unknown. Yet health authorities and
media have espoused as "fact" that the shot does not affect
reproductive health or fertility and is perfectly safe for
pregnant and nursing mothers
documents show they've not ruled out the risk of
antibody-dependent enhancement. Vaccine-associated enhanced
disease (VAED) is listed as an "Important Potential Risk."
As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75 of which were severe, resulting in hospitalization,
disability, life-threatening consequences or death; a total
of 38 cases were lethal and 65 remained unresolved
and FDA also knew that people of all ages experienced
transient suppression of immune function for one week after
the first dose
Times More Likely
With another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents, released April 1,
2022, old suspicions have gained fresh support.
As reported by "Rising" cohost
Kim Iversen (video below), the first bombshell
revelation is that,
natural immunity works, and
Pfizer has known it
The clinical trial data showed there was no difference in outcomes
between those with previous
COVID infection and those who got the
Neither group experienced severe infection.
was also statistically identical to the shot in terms of the risk of
More Likely to Experience Side Effects
The second revelation is that side effects from the shots were more
severe in younger people, aged 18 to 55, than those aged 55 and
(The risk of side effects also increased with additional
doses, so the risk was higher after the second dose than the first.)
As many of us have said all along, the risk of severe COVID is
dramatically lower in younger people than those over 60, which makes
an elevated risk of side effects unacceptable.
As noted by The Naked Emperor on Substack, 1
"with a vaccine that
is producing more frequent and more severe reactions and adverse
events in younger individuals, the vaccine should have been
restricted to those who were actually at risk of severe
Documents Show High Rate of Myocarditis
Interestingly, Pfizer's documentation also includes medical
mainstream media and fact checkers have labeled as
misinformation or disinformation...
A pediatric consent form lists
several possible side effects, including a myocarditis rate of 10 in
100,000 - far greater than the 1 in 50,000 (i.e., 2 in 100,000) rate
We also know that myocarditis is far more frequent in young males,
so for them, the risk is significantly higher than 10 in 100,000, as
they make up the bulk of these injuries.
Reproductive Health Are Unknown
The consent form also specifies that the effect on sperm, fetuses
and nursing children are unknown.
Yet health authorities and media
have espoused as "fact" that the shot does not affect reproductive
health or fertility and is perfectly safe for pregnant and nursing
If an effect is unknown, by definition you cannot claim it to be
If you do, you are lying, plain and simple, and Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky is
but one in a long list who is guilty of this.
She has repeatedly
assured the public that the jab poses no health risks to pregnant
women or their babies.
Here's Walensky in May 2021:
And here she is, in October 2021, still claiming there are no risks.
Similarly, in August 2021, when
Comirnaty was licensed, Dr.
Anthony Fauci, director of the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, claimed the COVID jab was safe during pregnancy:
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also
make definitive statements about safety, claiming,
occur in any trimester, and emphasis should be on vaccine receipt as
soon as possible to maximize maternal and fetal health." 2
the Comirnaty label 3,4 states that,
"available data on Comirnaty
administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform
vaccine associated risks in pregnancy."
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Has Not Been Ruled Out
Many who have warned about the possibility of
mRNA shots causing
antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) - a situation in which you end
up being more susceptible to serious infection than you would have
been otherwise - have been smeared and demonized
by media and
labeled as disinformation spreaders.
Yet Pfizer's own consent form clearly states:
"Although not seen to
date, it cannot yet be ruled out that the studied vaccine can make a
later COVID-19 illness more severe."
As noted by Iversen,
truly was of no concern at all, the consent form would not include
Yet there it is...
Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) is also listed as an
"Important Potential Risk" in Table 5 on page 11 of a document
called "5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse
Event Reports." 5
As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75
of which were severe, resulting in hospitalization, disability,
life-threatening consequences or death:
a total of 38 cases turned
out to be lethal and 65 remained unresolved. 6,7
Moreover, as noted by the
Daily Expose, 8
"Phase 3 clinical
trials are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects
before a vaccine is approved for use, including ADE.
But herein lies the
problem, [because] none of the COVID-19 vaccines have completed
Phase 3 trials."
Pfizer's Phase 3 trial is
due to be completed February 8, 2024 9 - nearly two years from now!
Despite that, Pfizer concluded in its FDA
"None of the 75 cases could be definitively
considered as VAED."
"[H]ow on earth could they not definitively conclude that VAED was
to blame when 75% of the confirmed ‘break-through' cases reported to
them were severe disease resulting in hospitalization, disability,
life-threatening consequences of death?" The Daily Expose asks. 10
Another revealing statement found in the documents is this:
evaluation showed a transient decrease in lymphocytes that was
observed in all age and dose groups after Dose 1, which resolved
within approximately one week..."
In other words,
Pfizer knew that, in the first week after the shot,
people of all ages experienced transient immunosuppression, or put
another way, a temporary weakening of the immune system, after the
As noted by Iversen, this may have skewed infection rates, as people
were not considered partially vaccinated until 14 days after their
first shot, 11 and officially fully vaccinated two weeks after the
If people are susceptible to infection during that first week, yet
are counted as unvaccinated during that time, this makes it appear
as though the unvaccinated are more prone to infection when that's
simply not true.
Pfizer's own trial showed infection was
significantly more common in the vaccine group than the placebo
group - 409 versus 287 - within the first seven days of the jab.
Are More Likely to Die From COVID
The fact that Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
aware the shot caused immunosuppression is incriminating, now that
U.K. government data show that, compared to the unvaccinated, those
who have received two doses are: 13
Up to three times
more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19
Twice more likely
to be hospitalized with COVID-19
Three times more
likely to die of COVID-19
admit there was a temporary drop in immune function after the first
dose, but the real-world data showing an increased risk of severe
infection and death due to COVID among the double jabbed suggest ADE
may indeed be at play later on as well.
The chart below, created by the Daily Expose, 14 using data from the
UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022
15 (pages 40 and
45), reveals who's more likely to get COVID.
And the infection rate
for triple-vaxxed is even higher than the double vaxxed.
The next chart was
created by the Daily Expose 16 using data from pages 41 and 45,
comparing COVID hospitalization rates.
And, finally, there is a
comparison of the death rates, based on pages 44 and 45 of the UKHSA
Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022. 17
Anyone over the age
of 40 who has been double jabbed is now more likely to die of COVID
than an unvaccinated person of the same age.
Vaccine Effectiveness in the Real World
The Daily Expose goes on to calculate and graph the real-world
effectiveness rate of the COVID jab, and it's dire news: 18
"If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which
they are, then this means the COVID-19 injections are proving to
have a negative effectiveness in the real-world.
And by using
Pfizer's vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately decipher
what the real-world effectiveness among each age group actually is.
Pfizer's vaccine formula:
per 100k - Vaccinated Rate per 100k / Unvaccinated Rate per
100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness...
This data shows that all double vaccinated people over age 18 are
between 2 and 3 times more likely to be infected, with a minus-87%
vaccine effectiveness among 18 to 29 year olds, and a minus-178%
vaccine effectiveness among the over 80's.
[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 30 are between 0.2 and 2
times more likely to be hospitalized, with a minus-1% vaccine
effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-76% vaccine
effectiveness among the over 80's.
The following chart shows
the real world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against death
among the double vaccinated population in England, based on the
death rates provided above...
[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 40 are between 2 and 3 times
more likely to die of COVID-19, with a minus-90% vaccine
effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-156% vaccine
effectiveness among the over 80's."
600 to Process Unprecedented Report Load
For the last two years, we've been keeping an eye on the U.S.
Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), shaking our heads
in disbelief as the numbers shot up by the hundreds every single
week, rapidly outpacing injuries for every other vaccine combined
over the past 32 years. 19
As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related
hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.
There has never been a medical product in modern history that can
Nothing has been as injurious and lethal as these
In an earlier batch of documents, we learned Pfizer received 42,086
case reports containing a total of 158,893 events in the first three
months of the rollout.
In that release, the number of doses shipped
was redacted, but in the April 1, 2022, release, it was left unredacted, which means we can now calculate the rate of adverse
events reported to Pfizer in those first three months.
Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped
out 126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide.
Divided by 158,000
side effects, we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1 in
800, 21 which is just crazy irresponsible.
We now also have documentation showing Pfizer, by the end of
February 2021, had hired 600 additional full-time employees to
process the unprecedented influx of adverse event reports, and they
predicted that by the end of June 2021, they'd end up hiring more
than 1,800. 22
In the end, the COVID jab will go down in history as the biggest
medical malfeasance ever to occur with the willing participation of
both drug companies and regulatory agencies.
And there's no end in
In March 2022, the FDA went ahead and authorized doses 4 and 5,
based on a preprint study 23,24 that found,
I'm not sure what it'll take for this public health nightmare to end
and for the responsible parties to be held to account for their
criminal negligence, but apparently,
we've not hit critical mass
1, 12 The
Naked Emperor Substack March 29, 2022
2, 3 The
Defender March 15, 2022
Nass Substack March 14, 2022
5, 6 5.3.6
Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event
Reports, Page 11, Table 5
7, 8, 10, 13, 14, 16, 18 Daily
Expose April 3, 2022
March 19, 2021; 70(11): 396-401
15, 17 UKHSA
Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022
19, 21, 22 The
Defender April 5, 2022
As of March 25, 2022
February 15, 2022, DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.15.22270948
Correspondence March 16, 2022 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2202542