by Dr. Joseph Mercola
his book, "Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and
Forensic Investigation," Dr. Richard Fleming documents
evidence showing SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon created over
the past two decades
you conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon, you must
also recognize that the COVID shots are nothing more
than the genetic reproduction of that bioweapon. In
other words, they are bioweapons too
same people involved in the funding of this bioweapon
are the same people who have interfered with doctors
providing treatment to patients, and the same people who
have been involved in the development of these COVID
Health care workers are injecting people with something
they cannot possibly give informed consent for, which
means health care workers are violating their
Health care workers who give these COVID shots are also
violating the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights Treaty, the Nuremberg Code, the
Declaration of Helsinki and other legal statutes
Helping you take control of your health in these crazy times is Dr.
Richard Fleming, (bottom page
video) a prolific author in addition to being a
physicist, a nuclear cardiologist, researcher and attorney.
Here, we discuss his latest book "Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A
Scientific and Forensic Investigation," slated for release September
7, 2021. It's an
incredibly well-documented book and contains history that many of us
aren't aware of.
As it turns out, the
creation of this virus goes back not a year or two but two decades.
"My area of aptitude [is] physics and calculus, the mathematic
language for that. Physics, and particularly high energy particle
physics, is something that I find very fascinating.
I eventually wound up doing some of that later on in life as a
nuclear cardiologist. So, [I've done] 53 years of research in
physics, and in medicine, I actually developed the inflammation in
heart disease theory and presented it to American Heart in 1994.
I joined American Heart in 1976 as the youngest faculty member at
that time, and I got put in several standing committees as a result
- basic and advanced cardiac life support as well as the physician
cholesterol education faculty.
I did a lot of research on dietary influences and factors that are
critical, not only for in the end - heart disease - but other
chronic inflammatory diseases, be that cerebrovascular diseases,
strokes, diabetes or cancer," Fleming explains.
Principles of Ethics
Fleming is also a scientific reviewer for more than 16 different
He was on the external clinical review board for The
Lancet, but quit in protest of the fake hydroxychloroquine article
they published - an act I believe demonstrates his dedication to
He also resigned from the
Journal Open Quality due to similar concerns.
"Eventually we either stand behind principles or we acquiesce and
become nothing more than the German doctors of Nazi Germany during
World War II," he says.
"And as history showed us, they eventually
paid a price at the Nuremberg Trials...
There are people - powers that be
- that think that they have things
going their direction, but it's very clear to me that they're not
confident that they've got everybody under control. The way in which
this is all being handled demonstrates that they're more worried
about the truth coming out than not.
And I think they're worried
about the consequences, as they should be."
Digging Up the Truth
Early on in 2020, Fleming started researching treatment options for
SARS-CoV-2 using the Fleming Method, which you can learn more about
Using this method, you can measure how a given
intervention works on the tissue level, and how infection or
inflammation is responding to the treatment.
He ended up developing 52 treatment combinations, and over the
course of that study, the length of hospitalization stays went from
five to six weeks down to one to two weeks.
But he also learned
"In the process of doing that research, I dug more and more and
investigated what was going on, and that led me into the background
of the research that many of these people had been doing," Fleming
"Tens of millions of dollars have been funneled out of the U.S., and
Anthony Fauci has helped with that. He's been on those committees.
You can see the grant numbers in the book."
Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?
While gain-of-function can be used for benevolent purposes, it can
just as easily be used for nefarious ones,
"and that's kind of what
you see happening," Fleming says.
"You see real efforts to produce viruses, coronaviruses, in
particular. Spike proteins of coronaviruses to be even more
specific, as I show in the book, paid for by the federal government
by people who say they were not involved in gain-of-function
Well, their fingerprints are on the documents, or on the published
papers or on the grants or on the patents. You can't say that you're
not involved in things when the documents show differently.
show the work and the money that came out of the federal government
that went to Peter Daszak at EcoHealth, that went to Ralph Baric at
the University of North Carolina, Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute
of Virology and other places.
For me, as a researcher, obviously, once I start to investigate
something, the only way you can stop me from doing that is to put a
bullet in my head. Otherwise, I'm going to stay after it.
things that are not in the book that are going to come out in
international criminal court, things I'm saving for that, because
this virus is, by definition, a biological weapon.
It violates the biological weapons convention treaty. You just have
to look at the definitions. It provides nothing useful to humanity.
When Fort Detrick is involved and the Department of
Defense is involved... and you see these monies and you see the
people that are involved, you realize that... the United States was
playing China, China was playing the United States, and you saw who
got caught in between.
And they're still playing the game.
For lack of a better term, this book is an indictment. That's now my
attorney hat going on saying that I have provided in this book
evidence that I would take to a grand jury...
I'm not somebody who
is going to give up on having these people dealt with, because all
the freedoms that we have lost, and the rights that we have lost as
individuals, not to mention just the numbers of people who have
My argument is... the reason why they died is because they didn't
get treatment for the inflammation and the blood clotting that I and
other doctors have shown works.
The ultimate argument is that you
can't kill somebody more than dead... they can't do worse than kill
the patient. And we've already seen what doing nothing does. It
kills the patient.
At no other time in American history have doctors looked at patients
'We can't do anything for you. Go home and come back when
you get sicker.'
We have always treated people with breathing
problems with medications for breathing problems. We've always
treated people with clotting problems with medicines to stop the
And so, the reason why this is so critical to understand is because
the same people who were involved in the funding of this bioweapon
are the same people who have interfered with doctors providing
treatment to patients, and the same people who have been involved in
the development of these vaccines."
While Fleming carefully lays out the evidence in his book, he leaves
it up to you, the reader, to decide whether SARS-CoV-2 is a
bioweapon or not.
However, he says, if you do come to that
conclusion (and he believes you will once you've seen the evidence),
"then you have to recognize that the vaccines are nothing more than
the genetic reproduction of that bioweapon."
If you are a doctor, nurse, pharmacist or other health professional
administering these COVID shots, you may be wise to reconsider your
participation in this scheme.
A significant problem is there's no
way to provide or obtain informed consent.
As noted by Fleming:
"If you're injecting someone with these drug vaccine biologics, you
are injecting them with something that you cannot possibly give them
informed consent for, which means you're violating your Hippocratic
Oath, you're violating the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights Treaty, you're violating the Nuremberg Code, you're
violating the Declaration of Helsinki.
It's right across the board. It's not even something that you can
pretend doesn't happen anymore. It's just in everybody's faces.
you can see that the powers that be are so stressed out right now
that they are cajoling and coercing and manipulating and attacking.
My friends in Italy tell me that vaccinated people are behaving in
the same way that they did during World War II towards the Jews and
And let's remember, the first people Hitler put in concentration
camps weren't the Jews.
The first people were the intellectuals,
because if you take the intellectuals and the doctors off the
street, if you stop people from talking, you can control the people.
So, the pressure being put on the medical community in this country
and in countries around the world to simply go along is nothing more
than the equivalent of what Adolf Hitler and the SS did during World
War II when they rounded up the intellectuals.
One [thing] will lead
to the next and there's nothing about this that has been a
successful campaign to control an infectious virus...
All you have to do is read the emergency use authorization
documents. I'm just stunned at how many people have not read these.
I'm stunned at physicians not having read these."
On flemingmethod.com, you can find several
video presentations and PDFs where Fleming goes through the emergency use authorization
With that data in hand, Fleming suggests asking yourself
some fundamental scientific questions, such as:
"Is there any
statistical difference in the number of people who developed
COVID-19 or died among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated?"
The answer provided in the documents is no.
There is no statistical
difference between the two groups. The vaccines do not statistically
reduce COVID-19 infection or death thereof. There are fewer cases in
absolute numbers, but statistically there's no difference.
that the risk of side effects.
If you take the shot, you risk
developing inflammation and blood clotting...
The same people that were involved
in the funding of this bioweapon
are the same people that have interfered
with doctors providing
treatment to patients,
and the same people that have been involved
in the development of these vaccines.
Dr. Richard Fleming
As noted above, coerced administration of these shots violate any
number of laws.
Fleming also cites supreme court rulings in which
the court ruled people have the right to choose their own health
"Rochin versus California had to do with an individual who was
forced to undergo emetic medications to force him to vomit, to bring
up things in his stomach.
The Supreme Court said,
'You do not have a
right to force this medication on people.'
Griswold versus Connecticut showed that the U.S. government cannot
take away the personal rights of health care in individuals unless
there's some type of compelling and substantial reason, and then it
has to be put into law.
It can't come out of the executive branch.
Cruzan versus Director of Missouri Department of Health in 1990,
specifically stated that patients have a right to refuse any
treatment. You cannot force treatment on people.
Well, this is
This is coerced treatment.
And Doe v. Rumsfeld proved in 2004 that investigational drugs could
not be forced upon people unless there is a presidential waiver or
informed consent. Well, here's the kicker on presidential waiver,
which is what they're going to go to.
Anybody who takes an oath of office
- the president of the United
States, senators, representatives to Congress, governors, police
officers, judges, lawyers, administrative officials - cannot violate
the U.S. Constitution. If they do, they've committed treason, by
In the U.S. Constitution, it states that Treaty Law and the
Constitution and statutes are the supreme law of the land.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights specifically
states that you cannot force people to take a drug; that they have
to have informed consent, and that animal research has to have been
done beforehand to prove it's safe.
So, if a president, including this one, issues an order that this is
a mandate and is required, then he is violating the U.S.
Constitution by violating Treaty and therefore has committed
It's not only an impeachable offense, it is punishable by death
because that's [the punishment for] treason. You can't force U.S.
citizens to undergo forced experimentation.
And you can't get around that by doing something cute like having
the FDA say,
'Whoa, well, we've now approved it, OK?'
Supreme Court has already ruled that you cannot force people to take
a treatment and the only party that can change that is the Supreme
Been Aware of Risks for Years
You've probably heard that the mRNA in the COVID shots are designed
to stay right around the injection site.
However, Fleming points out
that Moderna knew this wasn't the case, as they published research
in 2017 showing a lipid nanoparticle vaccine for influenza ended up
in the brain, bone marrow, liver, spleen and just about everywhere
else in the bodies of the test animals.
"So, for people to come up now and say, 'Gosh, golly gee whiz, we
just didn't expect that' is a little disingenuous," Fleming says.
"And I think you have to ask yourself, why does the cardiologist
know about the 2017 paper but the people responsible for the
technology claim they don't?
And so, what you see are normal healthy people responding to a
massive production of spike proteins and healthy people should make
a massive immune response.
What does that immune response do?
produces inflammation and blood clotting, and then the spike
proteins go across the blood-brain barrier and cause prion diseases
just like what's been shown in humanized mice and rhesus macaque
I'm willing to bet that the people who made this gain-of-function
virus already knew that, because one of the things that had the
government and Big Pharma coming after me in the 1990s [and] early
2000s was the fact that the research I was doing in dietary and
inflammatory disease had the same Neu-5-Ac raft receptor that the
glycoprotein 120 of HIV - which Shi Zhengli put [into the virus] in
2004 - attaches to.
So, the people that were doing this were paralleling my research...
It turns out that that information is critical for getting this
virus to be able to attach and to infect people like it's doing.
it's interesting how you can be minding your own business and doing
really good research, trying to answer some questions, and it might
just expose the people that are doing nefarious things."
What You Can Do if Your Job Mandates the Jab
Flemingmethod.com is a real treasure trove of information that you
can surf through.
There, you'll also find sample documents for
medical, religious, legal and Constitutional exemptions to
vaccination that you can present to your employer, educational
institution or anyone else trying to bully you into taking an
experimental COVID shot.
He also has
fliers you can print out and distribute that lay out
your U.S. Constitutional and statutory rights as a citizen, as well
as petitions for the President of the United States, Senate, House
of Representatives and state governors, calling on them to
investigate those responsible for this gain-of-function bioweapon.
You can find all of those petitions under the "Actions" tab at the
top right corner.
Fleming also encourages people to take legal
"I'm working with a number of attorneys to file suits in [the U.S.],
[and I'm] one of the experts in the International Court and Italian
courts for suits being filed for crimes against humanity.
bottom line answer to this is going to be everybody deciding that
they need to take action and [hold those responsible] accountable.
And yes, this may mean you lose your job...
You have to look at this, at this point in time, and ask yourself
what type of world are you leaving your children and your
grandchildren? This is never about you. This is never about me.
is about the children and the grandchildren.
Whatever we leave them, they're going to essentially be stuck with
it. If we abandon them - and the founding fathers did not abandon us
- then we are responsible for allowing this to happen. It's on us,
so there's no easy way...
If you ever wondered what you would have
done in 1930s Germany, today, you know."
With International Criminal Court
According to Fleming, Italian lawyers have already filed a case in
Italian Federal Courts and plan to file with the International
Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.
Attorneys from six different
countries are also putting together a joint case. While the U.S. did
not ratify the ICC, American citizens can still be held accountable
in the ICC.
Laws and statutes being relied upon include the Biological Weapons
Convention treaty, the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki
and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
now up to the ICC to decide what it wants to do, and when.
"It doesn't really matter how long this takes or to whom this has to
I'm a firm believer that there are enough good, honest people on
this planet that if the people communicate and work together, the
tide on this can and will be turned," Fleming says.
"It's the same story all over the world. All the people that I've
talked to in the different countries that I've been working with
have the same feeling. They're coerced.
Their citizens are being
bribed, which, as a side note, anytime the government has to bribe
the people to do it, you have to say,
'If it was really a good idea,
why would you have to bribe me? I would be lining up for it.'
I'm the ultimate, I think, research scientist.
After 53 years, I
really feel very strongly about being a scientist physician. And I
am incredibly offended when Anthony Fauci says he is science,
because he's not...
If these 'vaccines' actually worked and there was scientific
evidence, I'd be on here telling you to take it.
What you're hearing
me tell you is,
'Don't take it.'
These things are biological
They're nothing more than a genetic code of a biological
weapon that was made, that was paid for, and put together by
I'm not anti-vaccine. I'm anti-stupid."
the Biggest Propaganda Campaign in History
In closing, Fleming says:
"One of the things I do want to make a comment on now is for the
people who have not been vaccinated.
When you're looking at people
who have been vaccinated, step back for just a moment and recognize
that many of those people got vaccinated because they were told that
this was the only way to protect the people that they loved.
What we need to do is have the intelligence and the compassion
necessary to look at those individuals and say, 'I get it. No
If there's a shedding problem or something like that that
you're dealing with, there are treatments available that you can
look at. I put those on the website, too.
But come together and support those people, because they were just
doing what they thought was right. Many of them are scared, and they
have been made so scared.
By the way, what type of country, what
type of world, spends so much effort frightening the blazes out of
That says something."
Indeed, this is undoubtedly the most effective propaganda campaign
in the history of humanity, and it's hard to blame someone for
cracking under that type of a coordinated assault.
The good news is
that common sense has not entirely died yet.
"I think there's a lot of people that are very concerned that things
have gone south, so to speak. I'm actually encouraged.
One of the
things that I've noticed about being here in Texas is that common
sense has not died... [and] what I've repeatedly gotten from people
is 'Don't dumb it down.'
It's not a matter of turning people into Ph.D., M.D.'s or whatever,
it's a matter of just being truthful and honest with them.
have a really good capacity, when they get away from all the
nonsense happening, to look at the truth and realize it's the truth
and to listen to nonsense being thrown at them and realize that it's
just garbage and manipulation.
So, common sense is a really useful
tool for everybody to have. That and compassion...
We used to frequently sit down and have conversations with families
and friends where you'd argue back and forth and you discuss things,
and I can't be the only person that would walk away from a
conversation and go,
'Well, I hadn't really thought about that. Let
me think about that' because that's kind of a different point of
That exchange stopped when they quarantined people, when they
isolated us, put us in our homes and controlled what you could see
on the Internet and on television.
Well, we've come far enough back
out of it that that exchange has started again.
People have had to fight to get that information out, but it's that
sharing of information and knowledge that is so critical to turning
this around, and actually bringing all of this nonsense under
Not just the virus, but the manipulation of people that has
been going on and the lies and the deceit and the abuse of power.
They used our money to do it.
They used our lives to do it.
used our livelihoods to do it."
To learn more, be sure to
pick up a copy of "Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and
You can also find a lot of information on flemingmethod.com, including science-based
treatment suggestions for
COVID-19 and side effects from either the COVID shot or spike
protein transmission from a person who got the shot.