by Mike Adams

July 25, 2021

from AFinalWarning Website







CDC withdraws

fraudulent PCR testing protocol

that was used to

falsify Covid "positives"

to push the plandemic...

After more than a year of committing scientific fraud to push false "positives" via PCR testing, the CDC has announced it is withdrawing the RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel on December 31st of this year 2021:

After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2  (Covid-19) only.

CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.

The use of PCR tests for Covid illness diagnosis is a global scientific fraud, since no PCR instrument can produce quantitative results that might indicate a specific viral load.


Yet this CDC-approved testing protocol was relied on to fabricate the "casedemic" illusion which pretended that hundreds of millions of people around the world were infected with Covid.

The entire thing was an elaborate quack science hoax, and anyone familiar with PCR technology has known this from the very start...




The PCR testing approved by the CDC to diagnose Covid was fraudulent from the very first day

PCR instruments are not quantitative instruments.

They cannot tell you how much of something is present in a given sample.


Every lab scientist familiar with PCR instruments knows this.


Yet they continue to go along with the global fraud of diagnosing "positive" cases via PCR testing.

The entire Covid "plandemic" has been based on fraudulent PCR testing, and now the CDC is announcing,

it is pulling the most frequently used test, perhaps in an effort to replace the test with yet another fraudulent protocol that can be controlled by health authorities to worsen the "'pandemic" on demand  (or, perhaps, claim Covid has been eliminated and declare 'victory'...)

From the very start, the entire 'pandemic' has been nothing but a globally coordinated PCR testing fraud.


As Thermo-Fischer sales representatives told me in face-to-face meetings,

PCR instruments cannot determine quantitative results.


They do not use quantitative instrument calibration curves or quantitative external Covid standards.


This means PCR instruments have no legitimate role in diagnosing any person with illness or Covid infections.

The mere presence of a single viral fragment, multiplied trillions of times through PCR cycling, does not indicate anything of scientific or diagnostic value.

From Great Game India:

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test's reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present.


Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:

"if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%."

Similarly, the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.

The court pointed out that,

"a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person".



PCR analysts and lab science technicians are complicit in the global Covid testing fraud

The entire Covid 'pandemic' is a farce, and it was all based on fraudulent PCR testing...





Amazingly, even the PCR technicians and analysts all know this. They are taking part in a global scheme to destroy human lives and crush global economies, and they are fully aware that the limitations of their own instruments mean diagnoses of "positive" Covid status based on PCR are meaningless.

PCR instruments are not capable of any of this.

They are useless for diagnosing infectious disease, as they cannot produce viral load concentration results from a given sample...

If you want to know how much of something is present in a given sample, you have to use far more complex instruments such as mass spec triple quad instruments.

As Zero Hedge reports, even Dr. Fauci admits,

PCR testing is essentially a fraud when it comes to diagnosing Covid illness.


Dr. Fauci, mid-November, 2020:

"What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard... if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more... the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule...


It's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians, somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it's like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle...


So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it's just dead nucleotides, period."

Just as doctors, nurses and pharmacists are taking part in the global criminal Covid con,

PCR lab technicians and owners are gleefully participating in the same fraud, likely because they are earning huge profits from running fraudulent PCR tests that would never pass the scrutiny of any legitimate scientific test for accuracy or precision.

In fact, PCR tests are,

neither accurate nor precise...

The concept of "precision" - which is of utmost importance in quantitative lab analysis involving pesticides, heavy metals, and so on - does not exist in PCR equipment.


There is no such thing as precision when you're multiplying genetic material in the sample itself.


This process, by definition, destroys any meaningful knowledge of the mass or concentration in the original sample.

If the same approach were used in breathalyzer tests for possible drunk drivers, every living person would be arrested for a DUI, since there is at least one molecule of alcohol circulating in the blood of everyone.

The CDC is withdrawing this PCR method most likely because they know the test cannot withstand reasonable scientific scrutiny.


They're trying to cover their tracks and memory hole the fraudulent test that was used to drive the fake Covid plandemic in the first place.

But we already know the CDC is a criminal front for the vaccine industry, and that the CDC has no scientific credibility or authority whatsoever when it comes to legitimate infectious disease testing.

The CDC, just like the PCR test, is a complete fraud...


















Even the New York Times just Admitted...
The CDC 'May be Broken beyond Repair'
by Saul Zimet
July 15, 2021

from FEE Website



Image Credit:

Pixabay License



The resources wasted

and misinformation spread

by the CDC throughout the COVID-19 'pandemic'

make it difficult to imagine

how the agency could

ever be fixed...

As the COVID-19 'pandemic' seems in many ways to be winding down, journalists and academics are reflecting on the performance of our official institutions, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in handling this global health disaster.

The New York Times Magazine recently published an article titled "Covid Proved the C.D.C. is Broken - Can It Be Fixed?" by Times staff writer and editorial board member Jeneen Interlandi.


As her analysis shows, the actions of the nation's health protection agency throughout its COVID-19 response does not bode well for its ability to steward the nation through future catastrophes, or even more ordinary public health issues.





After investigating the agency, Interlandi reports that,

"The C.D.C. maintains more than 100 separate disease-specific computer systems (a byproduct of the agency's funding silos), and many of those can't interface with one another."

As a result, she observes,

"crucial data is often shepherded from health care facilities to health departments through a tortured process that can involve handwritten notes, manual spreadsheets, fax machines and snail mail."

Bill Hanage, public health scientist at Harvard University, is quoted as saying that the CDC has,

"no rational plan behind it," and its "random patchwork collaborations were initiated and transformed and now have an outsize impact on our understanding of public health."


"It's not uncommon for basic information like race, ethnicity, age or address to be missing from clinical reports," Interlandi writes.


"It's also not uncommon for those reports to languish at the state or local level without ever making their way to federal officials.


Even the most serious diseases, which are supposed to be logged within 24 hours of detection and reported to the C.D.C. in a timely way, are not necessarily sent up that chain in any systematic manner."

According to the Times, the agency was unable to keep reliable track of testing or case rates across the country throughout the 'pandemic'.


It also consistently failed to update hospital data such as ventilator supply and bed availability.

"And when multiple vaccines were finally deployed, the agency was not able to monitor supplies or accurately keep tabs on waste," Interlandi notes.




Many negative consequences have resulted from the CDC's disastrous data management practices. One such consequence has been the release of misinformation.


According to a New York Times article (‘It’s just everywhere already’: How delays in testing set back the U.S. coronavirus response) published in March of 2020, for example, CDC officials,

"provided conflicting accounts of when a significant increase in tests would be available."

Even worse, in May of 2020, the agency was revealed by The Atlantic to have been conflating multiple different and incomparable datasets.


Alexis C. Madrigal and Robinson Meyer write,

"We've learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating mistake: combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus.


The upshot is that the government's disease-fighting agency is overstating the country's ability to test people who are sick with COVID-19."

The CDC confirmed to The Atlantic that it had been,

"mixing the results of viral and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons."

As Madrigal and Meyer note,

"This is not merely a technical error. States have set quantitative guidelines for reopening their economies based on these flawed data points."

Ashish Jha, Harvard University Professor of Global Health and director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said about the CDC's conflation of these two datasets,

"You've got to be kidding me."

These are just a few of countless deadly errors made by the CDC throughout the COVID-19 'pandemic'.


The agency also developed their own test that was redundant with the one already approved by the World Health Organization, sent out flawed test kits which forced many states to limit test access, and regulated testing based on irrationally narrow criteria.


All at the expense of precious time and resources during crucial stages of the crisis.





The dangerous sloppiness, inefficiency, and wastefulness of the CDC, which has these traits in common with other comparable agencies such as the FDA, are no fluke.


They are predictable outcomes of virtually all publicly-funded bureaucracies, because such institutions lack any robust mechanism of accountability.


Accountable institutions, such as the for-profit companies of the private sector, cannot afford to leave their faulty processes unaltered because they will risk losing their supporters and being outcompeted into non-existence.


When a policy isn't working or an employee is underperforming, the price-signals of profits and losses give an unmistakable indication that something needs to be corrected.


By contrast, the bureaucrats of organizations like the CDC are disincentivized from correcting their mistakes.


Without the profit motive as an objective metric of success or failure, they profit not from the consequences of their actions being beneficial to others, but rather from obfuscating responsibility by following protocol.


The 20th century economist Ludwig Von Mises understood this fundamental truth about the nature of bureaucracy.


As he wrote in his 1944 book Bureaucracy,

"No reform can remove the bureaucratic features of the government's bureaus. It is useless to blame them for their slowness and slackness.


It is vain to lament over the fact that the assiduity, carefulness, and painstaking work of the average bureau clerk are, as a rule, below those of the average worker in private business."

As Mises explains,

"In the absence of an unquestionable yardstick of success and failure it is almost impossible for the vast majority of men to find that incentive to utmost exertion that the money calculus of profit-seeking business easily provides."

So, Jeneen Interlandi and the New York Times Magazine are right to notice that the CDC may simply be unfixable...