|
by Mike Adams
July 25,
2021
from
AFinalWarning Website
CDC
withdraws
fraudulent PCR
testing protocol
that was used to
falsify Covid
"positives"
to push the
plandemic...
After more than a year of committing scientific fraud to push false
"positives" via
PCR testing, the
CDC has announced it is withdrawing
the RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel on December 31st of
this year 2021:
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first
introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2
(Covid-19) only.
CDC is providing this
advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time
to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
The use of PCR tests
for Covid illness diagnosis is a global scientific
fraud, since no PCR instrument can produce
quantitative results that might indicate a specific viral load.
Yet this CDC-approved
testing protocol was relied on to fabricate the "casedemic"
illusion which pretended that hundreds of millions of people
around the world were infected with Covid.
The entire thing was an
elaborate quack science hoax, and anyone familiar with PCR
technology has known this from the very start...
The PCR
testing approved by the CDC to diagnose Covid was fraudulent
from the very first day
PCR instruments are not quantitative instruments.
They cannot tell you
how much of something is present in a given sample.
Every lab scientist
familiar with PCR instruments knows this.
Yet they continue to
go along with the global fraud of diagnosing "positive" cases
via PCR testing.
The
entire Covid "plandemic"
has been based on fraudulent PCR testing, and now the CDC is
announcing,
it is pulling the
most frequently used test, perhaps in an effort to replace
the test with yet another fraudulent protocol that can be
controlled by health authorities to worsen the "'pandemic"
on demand (or, perhaps, claim Covid has been
eliminated and declare 'victory'...)
From the very start, the
entire 'pandemic' has been nothing but a globally coordinated PCR
testing fraud.
As
Thermo-Fischer sales
representatives told me in face-to-face meetings,
PCR instruments
cannot determine quantitative results.
They do not use
quantitative instrument calibration curves or quantitative
external Covid standards.
This means PCR
instruments have no legitimate role in diagnosing any person
with illness or Covid infections.
The mere presence of a
single viral fragment, multiplied trillions of times through PCR
cycling, does not indicate anything of scientific or diagnostic
value.
From
Great Game India:
A
Portuguese appeals court
has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful
to quarantine people based solely on a
PCR test.
The court stated, the test's reliability depends on the number
of cycles used and the viral load present.
Citing
Jaafar et al. 2020, the court
concludes that:
"if someone is
tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or
higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in
Europe and the US), the probability that said person is
infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said
result is a false positive is 97%."
Similarly, the
Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for
COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific
basis.
The court pointed out that,
"a PCR test is
not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself
say anything about the disease or infection of a person".
PCR analysts
and lab science technicians are complicit in the global Covid
testing fraud
The entire Covid 'pandemic' is a farce, and it was all
based on fraudulent PCR testing...
Amazingly, even the PCR
technicians and analysts all know this. They are taking part in a
global scheme to destroy human lives and crush global economies, and
they are fully aware that the limitations of their own instruments
mean diagnoses of "positive" Covid status based on PCR are
meaningless.
PCR instruments are not
capable of any of this.
They are useless for
diagnosing infectious disease, as they cannot produce viral load
concentration results from a given sample...
If you want to know how
much of something is present in a given sample, you have to
use far more complex instruments such as
mass spec triple quad instruments.
As Zero Hedge
reports, even Dr.
Fauci admits,
PCR testing is
essentially a fraud when it comes to diagnosing Covid illness.
Dr. Fauci,
mid-November, 2020:
"What is now sort
of evolving into a bit of a standard... if you get a cycle
threshold of 35 or more... the chances of it being
replication-confident are minuscule...
It's very
frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians,
somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it's like
[a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture
virus from a 37 threshold cycle...
So, I think if
somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say,
you know, it's just dead nucleotides, period."
Just as doctors, nurses
and pharmacists are taking part in the
global criminal Covid con,
PCR lab technicians
and owners are gleefully participating in the same fraud, likely
because they are earning huge profits from running fraudulent
PCR tests that would never pass the scrutiny of any legitimate
scientific test for accuracy or precision.
In fact, PCR tests are,
neither
accurate nor precise...
The concept of
"precision" - which is of utmost importance in quantitative lab
analysis involving pesticides, heavy metals, and so on - does not
exist in PCR equipment.
There is no such thing as
precision when you're multiplying genetic material in the
sample itself.
This process, by
definition, destroys any meaningful knowledge of the mass or
concentration in the original sample.
If the same approach were used in breathalyzer tests for possible
drunk drivers, every living person would be arrested for a DUI,
since there is at least one molecule of alcohol circulating in the
blood of everyone.
The CDC is
withdrawing this PCR method most likely because they know the
test cannot withstand reasonable scientific scrutiny.
They're trying to
cover their tracks and memory hole the fraudulent test that was
used to drive the fake Covid plandemic in the first place.
But we already know
the CDC is a criminal front for
the vaccine industry, and that the
CDC has no scientific credibility or authority whatsoever when it
comes to legitimate infectious disease testing.
The CDC, just like the PCR test, is
a complete fraud...
Video
Even the New York Times just Admitted...
The CDC 'May be
Broken beyond Repair'
by Saul
Zimet
July 15,
2021
from
FEE Website
Image Credit:
Pixabay License
The
resources wasted
and
misinformation spread
by the CDC
throughout the COVID-19 'pandemic'
make it
difficult to imagine
how the
agency could
ever be
fixed...
As the
COVID-19 'pandemic' seems in
many ways to be winding down, journalists and academics are
reflecting on the performance of our official institutions, such
as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
in handling this global health disaster.
The New
York Times Magazine recently published an article titled "Covid
Proved the C.D.C. is Broken - Can It Be Fixed?"
by Times staff writer and editorial board member
Jeneen Interlandi.
As her analysis
shows, the actions of the nation's health protection agency
throughout its COVID-19 response does not bode well for its
ability to steward the nation through future catastrophes, or
even more ordinary public health issues.
A Labyrinth of
Ignorance
After
investigating the agency, Interlandi reports that,
"The C.D.C.
maintains more than 100 separate disease-specific computer
systems (a byproduct of the agency's funding silos), and
many of those can't interface with one another."
As a result,
she observes,
"crucial
data is often shepherded from health care facilities to
health departments through a tortured process that can
involve handwritten notes, manual spreadsheets, fax machines
and snail mail."
Bill Hanage,
public health scientist at Harvard University, is quoted as
saying that the CDC has,
"no
rational plan behind it," and its "random patchwork
collaborations were initiated and transformed and now have
an outsize impact on our understanding of public health."
"It's not
uncommon for basic information like race, ethnicity, age or
address to be missing from clinical reports," Interlandi
writes.
"It's also
not uncommon for those reports to languish at the state or
local level without ever making their way to federal
officials.
Even the
most serious diseases, which are supposed to be logged
within 24 hours of detection and reported to the C.D.C. in a
timely way, are not necessarily sent up that chain in any
systematic manner."
According to
the Times, the agency was unable to keep reliable track
of testing or case rates across the country throughout the
'pandemic'.
It also
consistently failed to update hospital data such as ventilator
supply and bed availability.
"And when
multiple vaccines were finally deployed, the agency was not
able to monitor supplies or accurately keep tabs on waste,"
Interlandi notes.
Misinformation from
on High
Many negative
consequences have resulted from the CDC's disastrous data
management practices. One such consequence has been the release
of misinformation.
According to a
New York Times article (‘It’s
just everywhere already’: How delays in testing set back the
U.S. coronavirus response) published in March of
2020, for example, CDC officials,
"provided
conflicting accounts of when a significant increase in tests
would be available."
Even worse, in
May of 2020, the agency was
revealed by
The Atlantic to have been conflating multiple different
and incomparable datasets.
Alexis C.
Madrigal and Robinson Meyer write,
"We've
learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating
mistake: combining test results that diagnose current
coronavirus infections with test results that measure
whether someone has ever had the virus.
The upshot
is that the government's disease-fighting agency is
overstating the country's ability to test people who are
sick with COVID-19."
The CDC
confirmed to The Atlantic that it had been,
"mixing the
results of viral and antibody tests, even though the two
tests reveal different information and are used for
different reasons."
As Madrigal and
Meyer note,
"This is
not merely a technical error. States have set quantitative
guidelines for reopening their economies based on these
flawed data points."
Ashish Jha,
Harvard University Professor of Global Health and director of
the Harvard Global Health Institute, said about the CDC's
conflation of these two datasets,
"You've got
to be kidding me."
These are just
a few of countless deadly errors made by the CDC throughout the
COVID-19 'pandemic'.
The agency also
developed their own test
that was redundant with the one already approved by the
World Health Organization,
sent out flawed test kits which forced many states to
limit test access, and regulated testing based on
irrationally narrow criteria.
All at the
expense of precious time and resources during crucial stages of
the crisis.
The Nature of
Bureaucracy
The dangerous
sloppiness, inefficiency, and wastefulness of the CDC, which has
these traits in common with other comparable agencies such as
the FDA, are no fluke.
They are
predictable outcomes of virtually all publicly-funded
bureaucracies, because such institutions lack any robust
mechanism of accountability.
Accountable
institutions, such as the for-profit companies of the private
sector, cannot afford to leave their faulty processes unaltered
because they will risk losing their supporters and being
outcompeted into non-existence.
When a policy
isn't working or an employee is underperforming, the
price-signals of profits and losses give an unmistakable
indication that something needs to be corrected.
By contrast,
the bureaucrats of organizations like the CDC are
disincentivized from correcting their mistakes.
Without the
profit motive as an objective metric of success or failure, they
profit not from the consequences of their actions being
beneficial to others, but rather from obfuscating responsibility
by following protocol.
The 20th
century economist
Ludwig Von Mises understood this fundamental truth about
the nature of bureaucracy.
As he wrote in
his 1944 book
Bureaucracy,
"No reform
can remove the bureaucratic features of the government's
bureaus. It is useless to blame them for their slowness and
slackness.
It is vain
to lament over the fact that the assiduity, carefulness, and
painstaking work of the average bureau clerk are, as a rule,
below those of the average worker in private business."
As Mises
explains,
"In the
absence of an unquestionable yardstick of success and
failure it is almost impossible for the vast majority of men
to find that incentive to utmost exertion that the money
calculus of profit-seeking business easily provides."
So, Jeneen
Interlandi and the New York Times Magazine are right to
notice that the CDC may simply be unfixable...
| 
