by Dr. T.
June 14, 2021
from ForLifeOnEarth Website

Information sent by Bazook894
Spanish version




I'm sharing the following hypothesis urgently of how the Covid-19 experimental injections may be harming and killing in the hope that it may be able in some way to help stop this attempted mass genocide.


I do not believe that this is an accident and I will explain why.

I am a UK medical doctor. My hypothesis is that the experimental mRNA Covid-19 injections contain a magnetized nanoparticle attached to the mRNA, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and is then attracted to the brain, particularly midline structures.


I further hypothesize that two things aid this passage of the magnetized mRNA to the brain: local temperature effects from EMF radiation and from an artificial network such as from hydrogel.


I will now explain why I am proposing this hypothesis.

Since April/May 2021, thousands of reports around the world have emerged of people who have been injected with the Pfizer BioNTech or Moderna Covid-19 experimental vaccines, who are now finding that a specific area where they were injected in their arm has become magnetic.


There are a number of emerging patterns, which need to be urgently investigated.


They are all emerging patterns and all, some or none of them may be of significance. It appears that people who have had two injections have a higher tendency towards stronger magnetism than those who have had one.


The effect seems to be extremely localized and strongest at some point in the first few weeks to a month, but this may not be the case.​

The effect is magnetic rather than metallic as the neodymium magnets can be seen to flip over if the wrong pole is against the skin and stick when the correct pole is against the skin.


Some patients can feel that pull within their body when the magnet is sticking. Some individuals, more common in those who have had two injections, are magnetic enough that metal objects will stick to their arms and stay there.


I have seen this personally and my understanding is that there are cases of objects as large as cutlery sticking to some patients.

Body types seem to vary on how easy it is to pick up this magnetism from the skin. It appears stronger so far in perhaps more muscular or slim people and those where their arms have a bit more fat or adipose tissue, it's weaker, but again, these are all small numbers.


A possible correlation also came up to do with previous flu vaccinations, particularly in the same year.

It is relevant at this point to note that there has been widespread discrediting of this magnetism from mainstream news sources, from the BBC to Reuters, the people affected by this phenomenon being "fact-checked" and called fakes.


Indeed, just me speaking to you now would be enough to make me get called one of those, too. It is also of note that the listed ingredients do not include any metals or magnetic particles.


However, this magnetic nanotechnology does exist and extensive studies in animals and cells in vitro have taken place over the last 5 or even 15 years.


Also, information at the time of writing, which is in the public domain, shows that the Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna both used an S-2 spike protein during their manufacture from a company called Acrobiosystems and they also show a diagram of their mRNA with a magnetized nanoparticle on one end that was used in the development of the Pfizer vaccine.


So it appears from this information that by some means, some magnetic property may have been transferred into the body during the process of the mRNA injections.


Possible cancer therapy using magnetic nanoparticles highlighted a possible issue in the past with free radicals. I hypothesize this magnetized mRNA is crossing the blood-brain barrier and causing harm there for a number of reasons.

Firstly, reviewing the passive databases from,

  • the Yellow Card System

  • EudraVigilance

  • VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System],

...with respect to Covid-19 experimental vaccines, a number of side effects are extremely common.


One example is Bell's Palsy.


This is where there is paralysis of the facial nerve and that causes weakness and drooping on one side of the face.


At the time of reading this, in the UK alone, on the Yellow Card System, there are 597 cases of Bell's Palsy, and also 387 cases where it was labeled "facial paralysis".


These are just the ones reported.

Most passive systems only report 1-10% of the actual number of side effects.


It is of note that many other side effects have been reported after the vaccines, including cranial nerves that emerge from the deep, midline structures of the brain, in particular the brain stem.


So from our main cerebral cortex brain here, and our spinal cord coming up, the bit that it meets in the middle is called the brain stem.


And from here, all 12 of the cranial nerves emerge.

  1. The first cranial nerve, the olfactory, damage to this affects sense of smell.

  2. Cranial nerve two, optic: damage to this affects vision.

  3. Cranial 3: ocular motor: damage to this affects the eyelids, pupils and the lens, i.e. the focusing part of the eye.

  4. Cranial nerve 4, the trochlear: damage to this affects looking down and towards the nose.

  5. Cranial nerve 5, the trigeminal: damage to this affects touch, pain and temperature sensation on the face, as well as chewing.

  6. Cranial nerve 6, abducens: damage to this affects eye movements.

  7. Cranial nerve 7, as mentioned, the facial nerve: damage to this affects facial expression, lip movements, taste towards the tip of the tongue, as well as tear and saliva secretion.

  8. Cranial nerve 8, vestibulocochlear: damage to this affects hearing and balance.

  9. Cranial nerve 9, glossopharingeal: damage to this affects taste at the back of the tongue, the gag reflex, swallowing and some aspects of speech.

  10. Cranial nerve 10, the vagus nerve: damage to this affects the muscles inside the organs, such as the heart, lungs and intestines, and I'll come on to this a bit more in a minute.

  11. Cranial nerve 11, spinal accessory: damage to this affects the movement of two large muscles of the neck - trapezius and the sternocleidomastoid.

  12. Cranial nerve 12, the hypoglossal: damage to this affects speech, movements of the tongue and swallowing.

The sixth, seventh, ninth, tenth and twelfth cranial nerves arise within very close proximity in the brain stem, which sits between the top of the spinal cord and the main brain, as mentioned.

I would like to highlight in a bit more detail about the vagus nerve, the tenth nerve, as it has such far-reaching and complex functions.


Damage can cause emotional disturbances, including anxiety and depression, difficulty with breathing and swallowing, changes in heart rate and blood pressure, including leading to fainting and syncope.


Damage can also affect digestion, with delayed ability to digest food, vomiting, nausea, heartburn and weight loss or weight gain.


Pins and needles may be felt at the extremities, such as the fingers and toes.

This leads me on to my hypothesis that low-level radiation from EMF may be directing where this damage takes place.


Although the significance of the small temperature increases that take place inside the brain with the use of mobile phones and other mobile devices has been debated, there is agreement that there is a very small increase in temperature that takes place within the brain with the use of mobile devices.


Many factors will affect how significant this exposure is, from how thick the skull is, to how much development is happening in the brain, so children and the elderly may be at more risk.

The effects of EMF are not just limited to heat.

There are animal and cell studies looking at changes of ion channels, demyelination and autophagy, too.

EMF radiation has been listed as a possible carcinogen since 2011 by the IARC, which is the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer.

When mobile devices are connected to the ears, either remotely using Bluetooth or via electrical cables, this radiation is going straight from one ear to the other and the meeting point of this between these two ears or the external auditory meatus is actually part of that brain stem, the part is exactly in the middle is the pons, and from the pons part of the brain stem, that is where the seventh cranial nerve, the facial nerve, comes from.

Could it be that this nerve and the other cranial nerves are being damaged at their origin by EMF interacting with magnetic nanoparticles?


This is my hypothesis.


This is not me stating this as fact, but I must put this hypothesis out there.

Of further concern is that there is emerging evidence that Covid-19 swabs, both PCR and lateral flow swabs, may be contaminated possibly with hydrogel.


If this is the case, then when these swabs are shoved far into someone's nasopharynx, enough to cause superficial trauma in many cases, that this hydrogel may also be attracted towards these magnetic and electrical fields.


The body's own magnetic sensing gland, the pineal gland, is also deep within the brain, and it could be that the combination of

  • hydrogel

  • EMF radiation

  • magnetized mRNA, a deadly trio that leads to deep brain structures being destroyed.

The properties of magnetic hydrogel are also being investigated and have been for some time.

This is not new technology.


These are only hypotheses, but they are extremely worrying ones.

With the further push-through of the Covid-19 vaccination program worldwide, including now on the children, who are at such slight risk of SARS-Cov-2 compared to adults,

how can we allow any further injections to take place without this issue being fully investigated?

These are now the children, too.


SARS-Cov-2 has been artificially made, it appears, from the strongest arguments made scientifically.


This makes it a bioweapon, however it got into circulation, accidentally or deliberately, still something that is manmade and causes harm is a bioweapon.

How we can then trust that an international pharmaceutical industry that has been involved in whatever way with the creation of a bioweapon, to then propose the 'cure'?

We must not be blinded because we can't imagine that people could want to harm others.

A very small number of people do.


And an even larger number of people allow and facilitate that harm taking place because they cannot face the possibility that others could cause harm and they, too, become the harmers.

Please consider this hypothesis and these series of hypotheses...