by Brian A. Wilkins
February 28, 2021
from TheCOVIDBlog Website
 

 

 

Please do your own research.

 

The information we share is only a catalyst to

expanding ones confined consciousness.

 

We have NO desire for anyone to blindly believe or

agree with what we share.

 

Seek the truth for yourself and put your own puzzle together

that has been presented to you.

 

We are not here to teach, preach or lead,

but rather assist in

awakening the consciousness of the collective

from its temporary dormancy.

Source

 

 

 

 

 

 


Our January 26 article, "World Health Organization's updated guidance for PCR COVID-19 testing will likely lower positive cases" is coming to fruition.

 

The WHO changed its policy for utilizing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique for COVID-19 testing. Make certain to read the foregoing article in its entirety for more context.

The following is a direct quote from the article:

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently updated its guidance for utilizing PCR for COVID-19 testing. Some are calling it a politically-motivated move.

 

The update came just hours after President Biden was inaugurated.

"The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient's viral load," the January 20, 2021 Information Notice says.

 

"Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology."

In other words the WHO said that the more cycles in PCR, the less reliable the test (inversely proportional).

 

The CDC was still recommending 40 cycles as recently as December 1, 2020.

 

 

 

PCR testing in 2020

 

The New York Times reported in August that most PCR tests in the United States used a 40 cycle threshold (Ct) standard.

 

Dr. Juliet Morrison told the Times that,

anything over 35 Ct is too sensitive and leads to inaccurate results.

"I'm shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive," Dr. Morrison said.

Harvard epidemiologist, Dr. Michael Mina, was even more candid in the article.

He said that upwards of 90% of positive tests in Massachusetts with a 40 Ct threshold would have been negative at 30 Ct.

Dr. Anthony Fauci also said that anything over 36 Ct is a false positive and just "dead nucleotides."

 

A study published in the British Medical Journal this past December found that 58% of positive tests at the University of Birmingham were false positives.

The U.K. was using cycle thresholds as high as 45...

The United States was averaging over 200,000 new daily COVID-19 cases from mid-November to January 20.

 

The latter date was Inauguration Day and the day the WHO changed its PCR guidance.

 

 

 

 

COVID-19 cases since January 20, 2021

 

The United States had its highest single day COVID-19 positive total on January 8:

315,179...

That number somehow dropped to 185,963 on January 20.

 

COVID-19 positive cases have dramatically declined since the new WHO guidelines were published.

 

 

 

 

The CDC reported 69,876 COVID-19 cases on February 27, a 62% decline since January 20.

 

Cases are down because mRNA shots are being deployed in the USA (sic), according to mainstream media. That position, however, is prima facie disinformation....

 

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks and Dr. Fauci are all on record saying mRNA shots do not stop the spread of COVID-19.

 

Further, an October 2020 peer-reviewed manuscript found that the CDC's statistical calculation methods vastly inflated COVID-19 positive numbers.

 

Positive COVID-19 cases will continue dropping because testing methods changed on January 20.

It has nothing to do with mRNA shots, masks, lockdowns, and/or social distancing...

 

 

 

 

 

Intellectual vigilance is vital

 

The only benefit to getting mRNA injections is 15 minutes of social media clout.

 

Public health and well-being are not the goals of government, big tech, big pharma and mainstream media.

If altruism was the goal, then Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine would be ad nauseum subject matters across all media platforms.

Instead both are dismissed as "conspiracy theory" despite hundreds of peer-reviewed studies concluding both drugs kills and prevent COVID-19.

 

Everyone reading this blog has a social responsibility to educate their peers and loved one in this age of censorship, subterfuge and global psychological conditioning.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

World Health Organization's Updated...

Guidance for PCR COVID-19

-   Testing will likely Lower Positive Cases   -
January 26, 2021
from TheCovidBlog Website

 

 

 

 



GENEVA

 

Dr. Kary Mullis won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for inventing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique.

 

PCR is,

"a simple technique that allows a specific stretch of DNA to be copied billions of times in a few hours."

Dr. Mullis made clear that,

PCR is not a testing tool for diagnosing disease...

He said PCR,

"can find almost anything in anybody" if it's done well.

 



Dr. Anthony Fauci is the Chief Medical Advisor to U.S. President Joe Biden.

 

Fauci is also a media darling who is considered omniscient and omnipotent in virology and epidemiology. Dr. Mullis butted heads with Fauci throughout their careers, particularly surrounded the HIV/AIDs epidemic.

 

The Nobel Prize winner once challenged Fauci to a debate on virology and epidemiology.

 

Fauci declined...
 

 



The Nobel Prize-winning PCR inventor died in August 2019, right before COVID-19 came onto the scene.

 

His PCR invention has since become the gold standard "test" for diagnosing COVID, despite the technique not being a test at all.




How PCR works in relation to COVID testing

 

Kim Schive, editor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, provides the most comprehensive, yet simple explanation as to how PCR is applied to COVID-19 testing.

The PCR test analyzes samples by amplifying viral RNA in cycles.

 

Most tests, like the Broad Institute test used by MIT, use a 40-cycle protocol.

 

If the virus isn't detected within 40 amplification cycles, the test result is negative. If viral RNA is detected in 40 cycles or less, the PCR machine stops running, and the test is positive.

Because you received a positive result, we know that the test detected the virus in your sample by the time it reached its 40-cycle limit.

 

But as we learn more, this binary way of viewing test results - positive/negative, infected/not infected - may change.

 

After all, the amount of virus in a sample is directly correlated with the number of amplification cycles needed to detect it, a number known as its cycle threshold (Ct).

A positive test that comes back positive in 20 cycles contains a greater amount of virus than one requiring 40 cycles.

 

Right now, we just call both results "positive." But it's obvious that the first sample came from an individual with a higher viral load.

 

And the greater the viral load, the more contagious the patient is likely to be.

As Dr. Mullis explained in the video above, his invention can find anything if you do it well enough. Or in the case of COVID-19 "testing," if you keep doing it until you find what you're looking for.

 

The New York Times published an article in August reporting that 90% of positive tests in three states were from asymptomatic people who were unlikely to get sick.

 

 

 

 

Global PCR cycle standards

 

Most COVID PCRs use 40 cycles of amplification, with each cycle doubling the DNA target, according to Yale Medical School

 

But even Dr. Fauci admitted back on an August 2020 podcast that,

a positive test over 36 Ct's is "dead nucleotides," a false positive...

 

 

 

Despite his own mea culpa, the United States continued testing at 40+ Ct's.

The United Kingdom was using 45 cycles...

A landmark ruling by the Lisbon (Portugal) Appeals Court related to PCR testing was largely ignored by mainstream media.

 

The November 11 decision found that the Azores Regional Health Authority violated Portuguese and international law. The agency forced four German tourists to quarantine in a hotel all summer due to a "positive" PCR from one of them.

 

The ruling was a scathing rebuke (english translation here) of the improper use of PCR for COVID testing.

 

The judges noted,

"In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus."

The ruling relied on a meta-analysis by the University of Oxford's Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (CEBM) and the University of the West of England.

 

The Court essentially found that,

there is reasonable doubt that PCR is a reliable test for COVID-19...

 

 

 

World Health Organization (WHO) about-face

 

The World Health Organization recently updated its guidance for utilizing PCR for COVID-19 testing. Some are calling it a politically-motivated move.

 

The update came just hours after President Biden was inaugurated.

"The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient's viral load," the January 20, 2021 Information Notice says.

 

"Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology."

In other words the WHO said that,

the more cycles in PCR, the less reliable the test (inversely proportional)...!

The CDC was still recommending 40 cycles as recently as December 1, 2020.

 

President Biden signed an executive order reversing the United States' withdrawal from the WHO under the Trump Administration. The EO also made Anthony Fauci head of the U.S. delegation to the WHO.

 

Several outlets are suggesting that the change has political implications...

 

The new guidance will unquestionably lower positive COVID cases, just as President Biden is taking office.

 

California Governor Gavin Newsom and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo have indicated their states will re-open.

Both had been lockdown hardliners throughout the Trump Administration.

The United States, in accordance with the 40 Ct PCR threshold, has recorded over 25 million COVID-19 cases since the 'pandemic' began.