"There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic... You do not vaccinate people who aren't at risk from a disease.
You also don't set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn't been extensively tested on human subjects."
Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory Disease
"What we know about coronavirus from 30 years of experience is that a coronavirus vaccine has a unique peculiarity, which is any attempt at making the vaccine has resulted in the creation of a class of antibodies that actually 'make vaccinated people sicker' when they ultimately suffer exposure to the wild virus."
Here's what I think is currently going on in our country and across much of the western world.
A public health crisis - that was manufactured and gamed-out before the initial outbreak in Wuhan, China - has been used to short-circuit long-held civil liberties, strengthen the authority of political leaders, collapse the economy, dramatically remake basic social relations, and impose absolute control over work, school, gatherings and recreational activities.
Public policy is now set by unelected technocrats who operate behind the cover of lofty-sounding organizations that are entirely controlled by the world's biggest corporations and richest oligarchs.
President Dwight Eisenhower anticipated this troubling scenario 70 years ago when he said:
"Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."
Bingo... This is the state of affairs in America today.
All real power has been conceded to a globalist oligarchy that operates behind the curtain of corrupt government officials and public health experts.
This begs the question of,
whether the hoopla surrounding the Coronavirus emerged as a spontaneous and appropriate reaction to a lethal and fast-spreading pandemic
or whether the hysteria has been greatly exaggerated (Infection Fatality Rate is 0.26% or 1 in 400) to implement a transformational political-social agenda that will not only eradicate democracy and basic human rights, but also pave the way for dangerous vaccines that will dramatically curtail population growth, which is an objective that is widely shared among wealthy elites...
Would it surprise you to know that vaccines have been used,
...to terminate fertility?
Would it shock you to know that "do-goodie" mandarins - who want to 'save the world' from overpopulation and global warming - have used toxic vaccines on unsuspecting young women who didn't realize that they were being used as lab rats in a malignant eugenics experiment?
This is from an article at Global Research:
"According to LifeSiteNews, a Catholic publication, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government...
... all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen.
The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines, but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and women of childbearing age.
Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4:
"This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine.
This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored."
It all sounds rather suspicious, doesn't it, especially since there was no tetanus crisis in Kenya to begin with.
Kenya was merely the testing ground for vaccines aimed at achieving more diabolical goals.
Why would a tetanus campaign only target women between the ages of 14 to 49 years old?
Why did the campaign exclude young girls, boys and men who were equally susceptible to tetanus?
You know why...
It's because the real objective had nothing to do with tetanus. Tetanus was merely the pretext that was used to conceal the activities of globalist elites working the kinks out of their depopulation strategy.
Take a look at this press statement by the Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops on the National Tetanus Vaccination Campaign:
"We are not convinced that the government has taken adequate responsibility to ensure that Tetanus Toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) sub unit is not being used by the sponsoring development partners.
This has previously been used by the same partners in Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to vaccinate women against future pregnancy.
Beta HCG sub unit is a hormone necessary for pregnancy.
When injected as a vaccine to a non-pregnant woman, this Beta HCG sub unit combined with tetanus toxoid develops antibodies against tetanus and HCG so that if a woman's egg becomes fertilized, her own natural HCG will be destroyed rendering her permanently infertile.
In this situation tetanus vaccination has been used as a birth control method."
I know what you're thinking...
You're thinking that they might have conducted these depopulation programs in Africa, but they'd never do anything like that in the United States where our ever-vigilant media would expose what they were up to. Right...?
Unfortunately, the media is owned lock, stock and barrel by the same people who create crises to advance their own self-serving agenda.
Covid-19 is probably no different in that regard.
The fact that,
the infection is modestly lethal, actually helps to achieve the broader goal of reshaping society, restructuring the economy, abandoning representative government, and reducing the population to more sustainable levels...
These are the real objectives of this politically-driven farce.
Check out this below article in Bloomberg (2019) which helps to shed light on today's Covid developments.
The article is aptly titled "Earth Needs Fewer People, Scientists Say":
"Forty years ago, scientists from 50 nations converged on Geneva to discuss what was then called the "CO2-climate problem"...
Now, four decades later, a larger group of scientists is sounding another, much more urgent alarm.
More than 11,000 experts from around the world are calling for a critical addition to the main strategy of dumping fossil fuels for renewable energy: there needs to be far fewer humans on the planet...
"We declare, with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from around the world, clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency," the scientists wrote in a stark warning published Tuesday...
When absorbed in sequence, the charts lay out a devastating trend for planetary health.
From meat consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and ice loss to sea-level rise and extreme weather events, they lay out a grim portrait of 40 years of squandered opportunities.
The scientists make specific calls for policymakers to quickly implement systemic change to energy, food, and economic policies.
But they go one step further, into the politically fraught territory of population control.
It,"must be stabilized - and, ideally, gradually reduced - within a framework that ensures social integrity," they write.
("Earth Needs Fewer People, Scientists Say", Bloomberg)
Forbes published a similar article titled "Over 11,000 Scientists Declare Climate Emergency".
Here's a short clip:
"Beyond simply sounding the alarm louder than in the past, the letter also offers immediate steps to be taken in six key areas to slow climate change and its impacts...
The steps represent a fairly drastic re-ordering of global society and its underpinning systems, starting with the phasing out of fossil fuels, replacing large-scale land clearing with reforestation efforts, stabilizing global population and greatly reducing the amount of meat and animal products we consume..."
("Over 11,000 Scientists Declare Climate Emergency", Forbes)
Finally, there's this statement published in the journal BioScience by dozens of scientists and endorsed by further 11,000 from 153 nations.
The scientists say the urgent changes needed include,
ending population growth
leaving fossil fuels in the ground
halting forest destruction
slashing meat eating...
"Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to "tell it like it is."
On the basis of this obligation and the graphical indicators presented below, we declare, with more than 11,000 scientist signatories from around the world, clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate 'emergency'.
Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per day (figure 1a-b), the world population must be stabilized - and, ideally, gradually reduced - within a framework that ensures social integrity.
There are proven and effective policies that strengthen human rights while lowering fertility rates and lessening the impacts of population growth on GHG emissions and biodiversity loss.
These policies make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity..."
("World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency", Oxford Academic)
(Notice how population control is a recurrent theme, a theme that coincides with the "zero emissions" agenda of elites and self-anointed "philanthropists.")
The fact is, there is a growing consensus among corporate leaders and other elites that we are facing a "climate emergency" that will require immediate and draconian changes to our political, social and economic structures.
Is it too far-fetched to think that Covid-19 was conjured up in order implement those changes without revealing the real reason...?
the public is pretty evenly-split on climate change which means that the opposition would likely be organized, well-funded and ferocious.
No doubt, that is something the oligarchs wanted to avoid altogether.
A greatly-exaggerated global pandemic was the much better choice...
With the media already in tow, and enough sell-out public health experts and Democrat governors to do the heavy-lifting, the prospects for success must have looked quite promising. 8 months into the current operation, the checkered flag is now within sight.
State governors remain unopposed in their usurping of special "crisis powers", Fauci and his ilk are still widely revered, masks are everywhere, rolling lockdowns and ever-tightening restrictions continue to be the order-of-the-day, and we are just weeks away from the icing on the cake, the thinning of the herd with a,
"nanoparticle-based vaccine containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol or PEG"...
In other words,
the stealth sterilization exercises that were conducted in Africa were merely a dress-rehearsal for the main event, the summary injection of billions of people worldwide in an effort to significantly reduce global population.
Are we there yet?
Not yet, but soon...
The teams of psychologists who worked with governments (to sell the Covid 'terror') and who figured out that mundane reality must be turned on its head, through,
social distancing, masks, shelter-in-place orders, the closing of schools, businesses, public gatherings, and religious services,
...in order (to create a disorienting and terrifying environment) to usher in a new authoritarian system in which personal freedom extends no further than selecting one's online purchases from either Costco or Amazon.
These psychologists deserve much of the credit for the transformation of the western world into a lockdown police state ruled by scheming miscreants who will now decide our future for us.
THE VACCINE - The Culmination of 8 months of Relentless Disinformation and Hysteria
While it's clear that the progress on the vaccines was deliberately delayed until after the presidential elections, (in order to hurt Trump's prospects for reelection.) very few realize the reason vaccines are being so quickly deployed.
the epidemic is rapidly winding down forcing the vaccine manufacturers to seek hasty approval so distribution can begin.
This is a matter of great urgency which means the FDA will undoubtedly cave in to political pressure and approve prospective vaccines way before trials prove them to be safe.
"the United Kingdom became the first country Wednesday to formally approve the Pfizer and BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine... The first inoculations are set to be rolled out next week...
The vaccine has been authorized far more quickly than any other in history, its lightning development outpacing the 15 to 20 years it usually takes to develop these types of medicines."
Naturally, safety does not factor into the creation of a vaccine that normally requires 10 years to develop but is swiftly slapped together and brought to market in a mere 8 months.
By definition, such a vaccine is not safe.
More from NBC:
"In the U.S., both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have submitted applications to the FDA for an emergency use authorization...
BioNTech CEO Uğur Şahin told NBC News' Richard Engel that he was "confident that an authorization in the U.S. could also happen within the next two weeks."..
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization told Reuters that it had received data from the companies and was reviewing it for "possible listing for emergency use" - meaning it could be rolled out quicker in developing countries."
Why are these turkeys being rushed to market?
As we noted earlier, vaccine distribution is being rushed due to the fact that the pandemic is winding down, in fact, for all practical purposes, it's already over.
In the US, the hospitalization and fatality data are being deliberately inflated to perpetuate the hysteria, (we'll explain this later) while in the UK, the fatalities attributable to Covid (in the fake "Second Wave") have never exceeded the 5-year average of "excess deaths", which is the barometer for deciding whether there is an unusual spike in mortality or not.
The Second Wave does not exist.
It is pure fabrication.
Check out this blurb from Dr. Mike Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory.
Yeadon dismisses the "Second Wave" theory as unscientific nonsense.
Here's what he says:
"Viruses don't do waves...
I have repeatedly asked to see the trove of scientific papers used to predict a 'second wave' and to build a model to compute its likely size and timing.
They have never been forthcoming. It's almost as if there is no such foundational literature...
There have been no examples of multiple waves since and the most recent novel coronavirus with any real spread (SARS) performed one wave each in each geographical region affected.
Why a model with a 'second wave' in it was even built, I cannot guess.
Despite the absence of any evidence for a 'second wave' - and the evidence of absence of waves for this class of respiratory virus - there was an across-the-board, multi-media platform campaign designed to plant the idea of a 'second wave' in the minds of everyone.
This ran continually for many weeks. It was successful: a poll of GPs showed almost 86% of them stated that they expected a 'second wave' this winter.
As research for this piece, I sought the earliest mention of a 'second wave'.
Profs Heneghan and Jefferson, on April 30th, noted that we were being warned to expect a 'second wave' and that the PM had, on Apr 27th, warned of a 'second wave'.
The Professors cautioned anyone making confident predictions of a 'second' and 'third wave' that the historical record doesn't provide support so to do.
I looked for mentions by the BBC of a 'second wave'...
On Mar 3rd and 6th, there is mention of a single SARS-CoV-2 wave with most (95%) of the impact early on. What looks to be the final document, Mar 29th, still just refers to one wave. This is what history and immunology teaches...
Despite this bothersome oddity about a 'second wave' and almost as if there was a plan for one, the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) testing infrastructure in the UK began to be reshaped... the Portuguese high court determined two weeks ago that this PCR test is not a reliable way to determine the health status or infectiousness of citizens...
With the scientific validity of this test under severe challenges, I believe it must immediately be withdrawn from use."
("The PCR False Positive Pseudo-Epidemic", Lockdown Skeptics)
No second wave??
Nope, it's 100% bunkum...
But "there was a plan for one", which is to say, there was a plan for amplifying the panic to achieve the objectives of elites.
Yeadon then explains how the PCR tests were removed from NHS (National Health Service) labs and delivered to privately-owned,
"mass testing centers" that replaced "highly qualified and experienced Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) registered biomedical scientists" with "mainly by volunteer unregistered staff in unaccredited laboratories that have been established within a few weeks."
Naturally, this threw into question the overall reliability of their test results which, in turn, produced massive numbers of false positives that in no way reflected the diminishing impact of the virus.
As Yeadon's states:
such mass testing brings with it, when using PCR as the method, a severe risk of what we call a "PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic".
This could never happen if we were not using PCR mass testing.
When a more reliable test was used in Liverpool (Lateral-flow test or LFT) showing that a smaller percentage of people were infected, the test was discarded in favor of the PCR test.
"By September, the great bulk of PCR testing was being run by large, private labs, some of which are called Lighthouse Labs."
That is when the number of infections began to spike sharply which was completely inconsistent with the behavior of epidemics in the past.
"How we can square these claims of tens of thousands of daily 'cases' and an unprecedented 'second wave' of deaths with the unfeasible quantity of testing using a technique considered by bench experts difficult to perform reliably even on a small scale?"
The whole charade was rigged to make PCR false positives look like a real epidemic...
Keep in mind, this isn't my unprofessional observation, but Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory.
And just look at the extent to which this farce was maintained.
Here's Yeadon explaining how definitions are stretched to the breaking point to exaggerate the number of Covid fatalities:
"A 'case' is a positive PCR test. No symptoms are involved.
A 'COVID-19 admission' to a hospital is a person testing positive by PCR before, on entry or at any time during a hospital stay, no matter the reason for the admission or the symptoms the patient is presenting.
A 'COVID-19 death' is any death within 28 days of a positive PCR test."
So, let's say you have a massive heart attack and die, but a PCR test shows you have harmless RNA fragments in your bloodstream, then the death is labeled "Covid"...!
Yeadon summarizes this hanky-panky in one terse sentence:
"We have very strong evidence that the PCR mass testing as currently conducted is completely worthless."
(Yeadon and a panel of experts have since submitted a 10-point paper to the Eurosurveillance editorial board challenging the science upon which the PCR test is based,
"which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19.
We are confronted with stringent lockdowns which have destroyed many people's lives and livelihoods, limited access to education and these imposed restrictions by governments around the world are a direct attack on people's basic rights and their personal freedoms, resulting in collateral damage for entire economies on a global scale.")
According to Yeadon and his team of independent researchers:
"The pandemic was over by June and herd immunity was the main force which turned the pandemic and pressed it into retreat.
In the autumn, the claimed "cases" are an artifact of a deranged testing system...
While there is some COVID-19 along the lines of the "secondary ripple" ...it has occurred primarily in regions, cities and districts that were less hard hit in the spring.
Real COVID-19 is self-limiting and may already have peaked in some Northern towns. It will not return in force...
That's it. All the rest is a PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic.
The cure, of course, as it has been in the past when PCR has replaced the pandemic itself as the menace in the land, is to stop PCR mass testing."
("The PCR False Positive Pseudo-Epidemic" Dr Mike Yeadon, Lockdown Skeptics)
Yeadon's analysis is similar to that of Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master's degree program at John Hopkins.
Briand wanted to see the effect that Covid had on excess deaths using the CDC's own data.
What she found was extraordinary, but consistent with Yeadon's analysis.
Here's a brief summary of what she discovered:
"From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related...
After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data.
In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.
"The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals," Briand said.
Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged.
Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths.
These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people's assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming.
In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.
..."All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary," Briand concluded."
("A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19", JB Wells News)
The research of both Yeadon and Brand help to show,
how fake testing results, manipulated mortality data, relentless deception and disorienting state mandates (masks, lockdown etc) have fueled public hysteria creating the compliant population our rulers seek...
Do I exaggerate?
Perhaps, but there are plenty of reasons to be concerned.
Keep in mind, the most enthusiastic proponents of these experimental vaccines (media) are the same people:
The media are the enemy of the people, and they have proved that many times over...
how can we apply this rule to the roll-out of the new vaccines?
We can assume that the interests of the wealthy powerbrokers - who own the media and set their agenda - will take precedence over the people who are in line to be vaccinated. That's all...
Their interests will take priority over your safety. That's the way it works.
So, one should be extremely wary of vaccines that are rushed to market in record time, just as they should be suspicious of the motives of people who see "skepticism" or "hesitancy" as a "national security threat".
These people are not to be trusted. It's that simple...
Why, for example, would the British government enlist "military intelligence to seek out and stamp out what The Times calls "anti-vaccine militants" and related "propaganda content" in cyberspace"?
Why would the social media giants remove articles that are critical of the vaccines?
Why are all the media and public health experts pushing for mass vaccination?
The answer is obvious, isn't it...?
It's because the wealthy powerbrokers that are orchestrating this operation, want to see We the People vaccinated en masse.
That's what this is all about.
So, the question is:
Why is it so important to them?
Is it because they want to save lives?
No, that's not it at all...
There's obviously something else going on that we don't know about.
Maybe it's climate change, maybe it's over-population, or maybe it's a collective determination to transform society into a technocratic dystopia... "The Great Reset"...
We don't really know, but one thing is certain,
all this ballyhoo about Covid is a red herring.
It simply diverts attention from the real agenda, which is why we should be cautious about the vaccines.
Mass vaccination could, in fact, be the ultimate objective.
Check out Yeadon's take on vaccines in a recent edition of LifeSite News:
"There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic...
You do not vaccinate people who aren't at risk from a disease. You also don't set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn't been extensively tested on human subjects...
Since it is demonstrable that "around 30% of the population had prior immunity," and if one includes some young children who are "resistant," 40%, and while considering that the infection rate is "somewhere [in] the mid-20s to low-30s per cent," this means that around 65 to 72% of the population currently has immunity to COVID-19.
And considering the reality of herd immunity, when susceptibility to a virus falls this low, at around 28 to 35%,
"that population can no longer support an expanding outbreak of disease," and thus the virus "wanes and disappears...
The pandemic is effectively over and can easily be handled by a properly functioning NHS (National Health Service).
Accordingly, the country should immediately be permitted to get back to normal life."
Is he right? Are the vaccines an unnecessary risk that serve no earthly purpose...?
Here's more from Yeadon on the potential downside effects of the new mRNA-based vaccines which are "all the rage".
"The formation of so-called "non-neutralizing antibodies" can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, "wild" virus after vaccination."
- The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2.
However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans.
It must be ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as it may otherwise result in infertility of indefinite duration in vaccinated women.
- The mRNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance.
This means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
- The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects.
As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow."
("That Was Quick", Lockdown Skeptics)
The new messenger RNA vaccines could make recipients more susceptible to serious illness or death.
Spike proteins can "trigger an immune reaction" that will "result in infertility." (Once again, Population control)
The new vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) which can be "potentially fatal."
The trials were not long enough to determine whether the vaccines are safe or not. FDA approval does not mean "safe". Quite the contrary. The FDA is "captured" in the same way the FAA is captured. (Think: Boeing 737 Max)
The new regime of Covid-19 vaccines is both unnecessary and risky...
Readers should ignore the hype and do their own research.
Take responsibility for your own health and welfare.
Do not expect the media or public health officials to tell the truth. They won't.
They want to use you as a guinea pig in their deranged lab experiment:
do not cooperate
do not comply
do not acquiesce
do not give in...