| 
			  
			
			
 
  by Carolanne Wright
 July 25, 2015
 
			from
			
			Wakeup-World Website
 
			  
			  
			  
			
			 
			  
			  
			  
			"It is scary how many similarities there are  
			between this 
			[pharmaceutical] industry and the mob.  
			The mob makes obscene amounts 
			of money, as does this industry.  
			The side effects of organized crime 
			are killings and deaths,  
			and the side effects are the same in this 
			industry.  
			The mob bribes politicians and others,  
			and so does the 
			drug industry …" 
			former 
			Vice-President 
			of Pfizer 
			pharmaceuticals 1
 
			  
			
			If you believe pharmaceutical corporations hold the health of the 
			general public in high regard, it's time to reconsider.
 
			  
			The industry 
			is filled with examples of wrongful death, extortion, fraud, 
			corruption, obstruction of justice, embezzlement, fake journals, 
			harassment and hit lists that would make even the most hardened 
			Mafia godfather blush.  
			  
			
			
			Big Pharma has been fined billions by the 
			U.S. Department of Justice, but these enormous fines don't curb the 
			corruption, it's just looked upon as "the cost of doing business," 
			similar to paying the utilities.
 As a physician and researcher, 
			
			Peter C. Gøtzsche has firsthand 
			experience with the criminality behind the pharmaceutical industry - and subsequently exposed the massive fraud in 
			"Deadly Medicines and 
			Organized Crime - How Big Pharma has Corrupted Healthcare."
 
 
			  
			  
			  
			Dangerous Science
 Dr. Gøtzsche has an impressive clinical background, as noted by The 
			Nordic Cochrane Center - a not-for-profit organization that produces 
			credible, accessible health information that is free from commercial 
			sponsorship and other conflicts of interest:
 
				
				Professor Peter C. Gøtzsche graduated as a Master of Science in 
			biology and chemistry in 1974 and as a physician 1984.    
				He is a 
			specialist in internal medicine; worked with clinical trials and 
			regulatory affairs in the drug industry 1975-1983, and at hospitals 
			in Copenhagen 1984-95.    
				With about 80 others, he helped start 
				
				The 
			Cochrane Collaboration in 1993 with the founder, Sir Iain Chalmers, 
			and established The Nordic Cochrane Centre the same year. 
				   
				He became 
			professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis in 2010 at the 
			University of Copenhagen. 
			Peter has published more than 70 papers in 
			"the big five" (BMJ, 
			Lancet, JAMA, Ann Intern Med and N Engl J Med) and his scientific 
			works have been cited over 15,000 times.  
			  
			Peter is also author of: 
				
					
					
					Deadly Psychiatry and Organized Denial (to appear in September 2015)
					
					Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime 
					- How Big Pharma Has Corrupted 
			Healthcare (2013)
					
					Mammography Screening 
					- Truth, Lies and Controversy (2012)
					
					Rational Diagnosis and Treatment 
					- Evidence-Based Clinical 
			Decision-Making (2007) 
			A large part of Dr. Gøtzsche's academic career has focused on bias, 
			trials and evidence synthesis.
 In "Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime," Gøtzsche reveals the 
			corruption behind exorbitant prices for branded drugs, bringing 
			attention to the fact that drugs are not expensive because of 
			development costs, but because of the political lobbying, marketing 
			and excess profit taking.
 
			  
			He also points out many trials are nothing 
			more than smoke and mirrors, where pharmaceutical companies organize 
			research in such a way that the best populations and comparison 
			groups are selected for the very reason that they support the 
			preferred outcome of the company; they control data and do analyses 
			in-house and hire professional writers to write the papers.  
			  
			The 
			pharmaceutical companies then cherry pick the results to suit their 
			marketing needs, instead of what's in the best interest of patients. 
			 
			  
			Many times, academics are paid to be listed as contributors to the 
			study, yet in reality, they had very little input and cannot 
			substantiate the data.  
			  
			According to Gøtzsche,  
				
				"The 'best' drugs may 
				simply be those with the most shamelessly biased data." 
			Moreover, Gøtzsche drives home the truth that pharmaceuticals are 
			just plain dangerous for a variety of reasons: 
				
				"Our prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death after 
			heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. 
				   
				Around 
			half of those who die have taken their drugs correctly; the other 
			half die because of errors, such as too high a dose or use of a drug 
			despite contraindications.    
				Our drug agencies are not particularly 
			helpful, as they rely on fake fixes, which are a long list of 
			warnings, precautions, and contraindications for each drug, although 
			they know that no doctor can possibly master all of these. 
				   
				Major 
			reasons for the many drug deaths are impotent drug regulation, 
			widespread crime that includes corruption of the scientific evidence 
			about drugs and bribery of doctors, and lies in drug marketing, 
			which is as harmful as tobacco marketing and, therefore, should be 
			banned.    
				We should take far fewer drugs, and patients should 
			carefully study the package inserts of the drugs their doctors 
			prescribe for them and independent information sources about drugs 
			such as Cochrane reviews, which will make it easier for them to say 
				'no thanks'." 2 
			Before you shrug-off Gøtzsche's argument as simply one man's view on 
			a complex issue, consider pharmaceutical giant Merck's tainted 
			history. 
			  
			  
			  
			Hit Lists, Fake Journals, Harassment and Big Money
 
 During testimony in an Australian class action case, emails between 
			Merck employees presented labels such as "neutralize," "neutralized," or 
			"discredit" next to doctors' names who criticized 
			
			the drug Vioxx.
 
 One email said:
 
				
				"We may need to seek 
				them out and destroy them where they live…" 
			The court was told James Fries, professor of Medicine at Stanford 
			University, wrote to the head of Merck in October 2000, complaining 
			about the harassment certain members of his team were receiving who 
			had criticized the drug. 
				
				"Even worse were allegations of Merck damage control by 
			intimidation," he wrote.   
				"This has happened to 
				at least eight (clinical) investigators… I suppose I was mildly 
				threatened myself but I never have spoken or written on these 
				issues." 
			Jump to 2001 and the company was still engaging in unethical 
			tactics.  
			  
			Merck apparently: 
				
				Produced a fake 'peer reviewed' journal under the name of 
				"Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine" for the sole 
			purpose of marketing pro-Vioxx articles. 
			Published an entirely ghostwritten journal article and had a doctor 
			sign his name to it, even though a Merck employee felt the data 
			presented was "wishful thinking."
 With this three-ring circus of corruption projected to become worse 
			in the future, the American Medical Association (AMA) has - right on 
			cue - brought forward new guidelines which will essentially place a 
			gag order on any physicians who do not tow the party line, including 
			those who speak out against pharmaceuticals.
 
				
				"There's a great deal of dissent among medical professionals when it 
			comes to natural health, and many refuse to entertain the idea that 
			healing involves more than pharmaceutical chemicals.    
				The American 
			Medical Association has recently set forth new guidelines that will:
				 
					
					'create ethical guidelines for physicians in the media, write a 
			report on how doctors may be disciplined for violating medical 
			ethics through their press involvement, and release a public 
			statement denouncing the dissemination of dubious medical 
			information through the radio, TV, newspapers, or/and websites'," said 
			Dr. Edward Group, founder of the Global Healing Center. 
			Incredibly, the AMA represents only 17% of medical doctors, many of 
			which are medical students who were given a free membership.  
			  
			And 
			yet, the organization is the fifth most powerful special interest 
			group on Capitol Hill, paying out a staggering $19.7 million for 
			lobbying efforts in 2014 alone.
 Read more about the silencing of medical dissenters - and how to 
			take action -
			
			here.
 
 
			  
			  
			Sources
 
				
					
					
					Richard Smith: 
					"Is the pharmaceutical industry like the mafia?" 
					
					"Our 
					prescription drugs kill us in large numbers" Gøtzsche PC, Pol Arch Med 
					Wewn. 2014;124(11):628-34. Epub 2014 Oct 30 
			    |