by Ethan Indigo Smith
September 2, 2012
Death, brought to you
This article contains information you
might want to ignore. California was nuked in the fifties.
The Matrix of Four types of information
explained in relation to the enhanced entropy of nuclear
experimentation. How nuclear experimentation killed ocean current
power, and possibly is preventing us from understanding the god
particle/the Higgs Boson counter-wave.
The first (known) meltdown of a nuclear power generator in the
U.S.A. occurred in July of 1959 at the Santa Susana Field
Laboratories in Simi Valley, CA.
Since this accident pre-dated any
regulation of the nuclear industry, no one will ever know how much
radioactivity was strewn around as a result. Reasonable people guess
the released amount was comparable to what happened at Three Mile
Island or Chernobyl, but much less than the ongoing disaster at
The Simi Valley reactor was an experimental “fast-breeder” type,
bizarrely cooled by liquefied metallic Sodium, a substance which
will explode when doused with water, and burst into flame when
exposed to air.
Thousands of pounds of this laboratory curiosity
remain unaccounted for. Obviously it has all long since oxidized,
and remains in the biosphere as Sodium ions, the familiar Sodium
part of Sodium Chloride, table salt.
Except, of course, for such
Sodium as absorbed a fast-moving neutron from the fast-breeder,
turning into radioactive Sodium 24, which in view of a half-life
measured in hours, has long since decayed to the radio stable
The point is, this was an experiment that only a national government
had sufficient resources to undertake, and has already had
And all this is exemplary of the “atomic cowboy” culture of the
Santa Susana Laboratories, in which flammable materials, placed in
barrels would be dropped into a pit and then ignited by being shot
with rifles, a practice which continued, at least sporadically, into
The point is all commercial nuclear industries are also
experimental. Whether it is nuclear power generation or nuclear
detonation, all nuclear industry is experimental. I refuse to go
along with the status quo of painted euphemisms and call such a
thing that can kill all life on the planet, a plant.
facility is a plant, they are all experiments.
Will top management of utility companies - people whose focus seldom
reaches beyond the balance sheets of current quarter and perhaps one
subsequent quarter - exercise an appropriate level of control on
wastes that will be dangerously radioactive for dozens of thousands
Will the American nucpublic remain gullible enough to
allow this nuclear experimentation, with all of us as subjects?
if so, for what fraction of those dozens of thousands of years?
all part of the experiment.
For these reasons and myriad others, nuclear power and the nuclear
industry are hereinafter referenced as nuclear experimentation and
should be labeled nuclear experimentation by the scientific
community and any analytical minds who might think accurate language
is good and decent.
Every time a new discovery is made
concerning nuclear experimentation it is found that it is an
even less sustainable business practice than ever portrayed.
becomes increasingly obvious that nuclear experimentation is
more dangerous, more insidious than ever portrayed; that the
whole industry is based on lying about how costly it all is
economically, environmentally, and for that matter, ethically.
With hindsight, it is also undeniable that the nuclear
experimentation industry is based on lying about how costly it
all is. If they can, they will obfuscate truth entirely. The
works at Santa Susana laboratories didn’t even tell their
families downwind there might be something problematic in the
air. Major fires went unreported as did the 1959 meltdown.
after a similar meltdown at Three Mile Island was the extent of
the Santa Susana experiment revealed.
Already nuclear experimentation has
resulted in the destruction of a significant portion of Japan and a
region in Europe through accidents alone at what is euphemistically
called ‘plants.’ The Fukushima inevitability of nuclear power
generation has permanently altered the planet, some areas
There have been two thousand
nuclear detonations above and below ground, in the air and in
the water; nowhere on the planet is untainted, while some areas
have been devastated more than others. You are in an experiment.
Even without further war and without
further mechanical complication of nuclear power generation
experiments, the process of containment of materials is actually
Hanford, Washington is a leaking disaster zone simply
because the radioactive materials cannot be handled and contained
safely. The materials for the first nuclear detonations were
developed there. Nuclear experimentation promises devastating
consequences to future stability of life on the planet. If nuclear
experimentation is not ceased, it could cease all life as we know
This is not wild deduction, but actual fact. Nuclear
experimentation promises devastating consequences for the future of
all life on this planet. The gross amount of toxicity already
constitutes an existential threat.
In 1964, the Santa Susana laboratories launched SNAP-9A, which,
“Failed to achieve orbit,” and burned up while falling back into the
atmosphere. Its plutonium reactor released toxins and poisoned life
on the planet, poisoned us all, and added another little enhancement
to the toxicity and carcinogenicity to our global environment.
Several years ago, NASA launched a space vehicle that depended on a
“slingshot maneuver” using the Earth’s gravity to carry it deeper
into space. It contained enough Plutonium to kill all of us or at
least to give almost everyone a really bad case of cancer.
The time, energy and resources that have been invested into nuclear
experimentation are likely incalculable.
It is an industry of
inhuman lies and practices, one which voids all consideration of
clean air, clean water and healthy food. Where humanity would be
today without nuclear experimentation is impossible to say, but
without it surely the planet would be less toxic and polluted.
I submit that, simply because necessity is mother of invention, if
it were not for nuclear experimentation humanity could already have
free, or for all extents and purposes endless and harmless, power
sources. Because we have nuclear power, because we have been induced
to believe it is modern technology and not totally experimental and
deadly, there has not been the impetus for the last sixty-seven
years to search out less deadly energy sources.
Moreover, because of
the oligarchical collectivism exhibited in the nuclear
experimentation industry, from the subsidization of the Price
Anderson Act onward, it’s not so wild to suggest that energy
alternatives are suppressed, since these subsidies of nuclear
experimentation necessarily also act to suppress more desirable
And I’m not talking about the conspiracies of suppression of solar
power capability and suppression of electric vehicles; it’s much
bigger than that.
There are ocean currents, not far offshore of the
East Coast which could spin underwater ‘windmills’ and turbines to
generate enormous amounts of power, without dangerous repercussions.
This power facility would indeed be ‘too cheap to meter’, a slogan
from the early days of nuclear experimentation. And harnessing
energy from currents is just scratching the surface.
But, hell, why
bother when you got nuclear power? Wind, wave, solar and water power
sources belittle nuclear experimentation, for they are safe and
endless. Any source of power is better than nuclear experimentation,
however none is as oligarchical.
The dangers of nuclear experimentation have always been
belittled, while the benefits of nuclear experimentation have always
been exaggerated. It is an industry of truth omission. It is the
industry which most frequently states “there is no immediate danger
to the public” and it is the one which most frequently lies about
the public dangers it poses, to all life on Earth.
When it comes to any subject, especially one as dynamic as nuclear
experimentation, there are things we know and things we don’t know.
As explained in the
Matrix of Four, the Philosophy of the Duality of Polarity
there are four types of information, as elaborated on by the likes
of Socrates and hinted at by Donald Rumsfeld. And as empirically
obvious, the more dynamic and serious the subject the more likely
people will ignore all information pertaining to it.
The subject of global environmental destruction is such an extreme
subject and is ignored totally to the point society continues to
argue over the human effect on temperature rather than change our
toxic ways, with no reasoning but oligarchical rewards.
The four types of information are the known knowns and the unknown
There are also known unknowns and finally, unknown knowns.
The fourth part is the most difficult to quantify; these are
intuitive or instinctual things and secrets. Donald didn’t mention
this fourth part, for he likely operated through secrets and the
The knowns of nuclear experimentation and its negative consequences
to life, its economic and societal costs, is enough to demand we
cease it everywhere.
And what of the unknown unknowns?
implications for the Earth does promotion of global nuclear
What unknown knowns does the nuclear
experimentation industry possess that they are not sharing?
One interesting known known is that the EPA turned off public access
to the radiation detection equipment on the west coast after the
It is known that the nuclear industry all over
the world lies and omits the truth for each other, Japan and TEPCO,
refused to admit there was any danger to the public, before
disclosing there was an accident, then admitting there were partial
meltdowns, later that there were meltdowns and ultimately admitting
that multiple complete melt throughs had occurred.
The E.P.A. turned
off the radiation detection equipment. (here
Safety of nuclear power has always been lied about and the danger
has never been and could never be exaggerated. It is obvious that
the oligarchical collectivism of the nuclear experimentation
industry has indirectly eliminated alternative power systems to the
extraction of and concoction of dangerous minerals. It has done so
simply through its existence as well as through diabolical influence
and outright subversion of systems less oligarchical.
It is a fact that nuclear power generation experiments distort
the magnetics of whatever locality they may be built.
of the local magnetic field is one of many things they have to
consider when constructing these experiments. The chain reaction and
the electric production is so intense the machine effects the magnetics of the given area.
A single nuclear detonation disrupts
the magnetic field sending out an electromagnetic pulse powerful
enough to disable the electrical infrastructure of a given region.
These are known.
Now consider unknowns of global nuclear
What does one nuclear power generation experiment
do to the magnetic field of the planet? What does the combination of
approximately four hundred and thirty, plus nuclear reactor
submarines do to the magnetic field of the planet? These are
assumedly known unknowns, we know that we don’t know.
Now consider the discovery of
the Higgs Boson particle. I am no
damned nuclear scientist and I am not a physicist either, thankfully
though information is easily obtainable and anyone with a moment and
curiosity can learn nuclear experimentation is a rabbit hole of
death and learn a little about quantum physics.
In laymen’s terms,
discovery of the Higgs Boson particle essentially means that of
hundreds of different given particles there is only one that has any
mass and weight. It’s another counterintuitive fact in quantum
physics, just like the fact that there are particles and waves and
the odd thing is that particles behave as waves, a lot.
Now if there
is just one particle among many which has mass and weight, that
behaves like a wave at any given time, theoretically if one is able
to produce some sort of counter-wave one could tap into the glue of
the universe and make extremely heavy objects as light as air, and
further one could tap into this power and harness a power flow so
intense as to be only limited by how much is required.
There are four forms of power in the universe and my ignorant guess
would be that the counter-wave is of the electro-magnetic variety. I
have a one in four chance of being right.
What if nuclear
experimentation causes unknown destruction and disruption of the
magnetic field of Earth resulting in conditions where implementation
of the counter-wave is impossible?
What if nuclear experimentation
is, literally, physically preventing tapping into the glue of the
universe and understanding the counter-wave of what is called the
Originally it was labeled the God damned
particle for it could not be found.
What if nuclear experimentation
is preventing our understanding and finding the counter-wave?
Such a wave is not so outlandish of an idea. Such questions are
absolutely relevant amidst the planet-altering, life-ending known
potentials of nuclear experimentation. In fact use of such a
counter-wave is perhaps how one could explain the transportation of
massive stones and the erection of massive stone objects that
ancients all around the world seemed able to do and that modern man
can not duplicate.
How else could some of these structures
and stones be explained?
The known knowns of nuclear experimentation
is enough to demand its elimination and what of the known unknowns
or worse the unknown knowns, the secrets some in the industry have
that they are keeping from us?
I hear the following political reference being used to call to
question certain circumstances, some applicable to the hyperbole and
most, not so much.
In respect to nuclear experimentation, it is
completely valid to say. Question nuclear experimentation, for the
children. The biggest issue on the Earth is that of nuclear
Stop nuclear experimentation, for the children.