| 
			  
			  
			
			
  by Ethan A. Huff
 staff writer
 May 12, 2012
 
			from
			
			NaturalNews Website 
			  
			  
			A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by,
 
				
					
					
					Friends of the 
			Earth (FoE)
					
					Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR)
					
					the 
			Nuclear Information and Resource Center (NIRS), 
			...has unearthed a 
			shocking series of new evidence proving a deliberate, global 
			cover-up of the true severity of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear 
			disaster.  
			  
			And the unfortunate reality is that the 
			mainstream media continues to blatantly ignore this colossal 
			scandal.
 Private emails, meeting transcripts and other key documents reveal 
			that both the Obama White House and the United States Nuclear 
			Regulatory Commission (NRC) were well aware of just how bad things 
			really were with Fukushima from the early days of the disaster, but 
			did nothing to warn the public about it.
 
			  
			In fact, NRC and the White House 
			purposely did not warn Americans about a massive radiation plume 
			that struck the West Coast just days after the massive earthquake 
			and tsunami hit Japan's eastern coast.
 According to information gathered from hundreds of pages worth of 
			private NRC emails, conference calls and secret meetings, key 
			players in the Fukushima whitewashing campaign, including the NRC's
			David McIntyre and Elliot Brenner, were hard at work 
			in the days following the disaster distracting public attention away 
			from it.
 
			  
			By pretending that a radioactive plume 
			did not exist while simultaneously sending out misinformation to the 
			media, these two, in conjunction with White House officials, 
			actively participated in a criminal cover-up of the truth.
 You can read key portions of these criminal dealings
			
			here.
 
 
 
			  
			  
			Plume-gate, the 
			world's biggest nuclear cover-up to date 
			A situation that is now being dubbed "Plume-gate," this massive 
			cover-up of critical information about Fukushima could have saved 
			thousands of lives, including the more than 14,000 individuals, many 
			of whom were babies, that
			
			died in the weeks following the disaster.
 
			  
			And yet to this very day, the federal 
			government's cozy relationship with the nuclear industry has allowed 
			the injustice to continue, as no proper investigation into this 
			dastardly crime has yet taken place. 
				
				"The executive branch and multiple 
				federal agencies, agencies tasked with keeping the American 
				public safe, did their best to hide and to cover-up information 
				about a deadly radioactive plume and ensuing fallout that was 
				headed for the West Coast of the United States from Japan," 
				writes Tony Muga from The Intel Hub about the situation. 
			Not only did these government agencies 
			hide the truth and deliberately deceive the public, they also used 
			other events, including the infamous Qur'an burning in Afghanistan, 
			as a distraction to divert public attention away from Fukushima, and 
			away from the 104 nuclear reactors in the U.S. that are of a similar 
			age and vulnerability as Fukushima.
 So why is the federal government getting away with all this?
 
			  
			It is for the same reason that it gets 
			away with most of its other crimes against humanity: corporate 
			fascism. And sadly, corporate fascism is a bipartisan problem, as 
			both Republicans and Democrats today are slaves to it, representing 
			opposite but identical sides of the same coin. 
				
				"It seems that the fundamental 
				problem with what Americans are experiencing is not just 
				radioactive fallout but Fascism, the merging of the corporate 
				and the state," adds Muga.    
				"In a fascist state, there is little 
				or no responsible action from the corporations for there is 
				little or no promotion of accountability from the state. The 
				corporations, for all intents and purposes, control the state." 
			
			
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
			
			
			Plume-Gate 
			
			
			Media Silent Over Feds Fukushima Cover-Upby Tony Muga
 February 27, 2012
 
			the
			
			TheIntelHub Website
 
			Nearly a week after FOIA documents revealed a massive concerted 
			government orchestrated Fukushima cover up, the corporate media 
			remains silent.
 
 The FOIA documents, emails and transcripts I wrote about in 
			
			the NRC 
			cover-up article have been out for at least two weeks.
			The three groups that petitioned for them to be released have 
			remained quiet, very quiet, choosing instead to post the documents 
			online and see who runs with it.
 
 Enformable.com carried several editorials, but nothing that 
			connected all the dots together.
 
 Let’s see if I can put bluntly what others will not say:
 
 The executive branch and multiple federal agencies, agencies tasked 
			with keeping the American public safe, did their best to hide and to 
			cover-up information about a deadly radioactive plume and ensuing 
			fallout that was headed for the West Coast of the United States from 
			Japan.
 
 The fact it was real and did arrive is proven by samplings from 
			milk, vegetables and rainwater.
 
 Even though EPA testing methodology and actual capability were 
			questioned, 
			
			independent sources verified the fallout.
 
 To those who say radiation does not travel in a plume or that 
			fallout is a local phenomenon, read ‘Chernobyl 
			- Consequences of The Catastrophe for People and The Environment’.
 
			  
			There is an excellent distillation of 
			the book at
			
			GlobalResearch.ca.
 The evidence obtained in the FOIA request indicates that right from 
			the start, the NRC had a clear idea of the significance of the 
			disaster that was unfolding, but concealed the truth from the 
			American public.
 
 The results of the plume and fallout can be measured in the rise of 
			infant mortality rates: cells of unborn and newborn children are 
			dividing at a much higher rate than those of a mature adult, thus 
			the amount of damage is greatly increased and hence more detectable.
 
 Conservative estimates place the number of stillborn following the 
			Fukushima accident at over 18,000.
 
				
					
					
					How many could have been saved by 
			simply warning folks to stay indoors?
					
					Why didn’t a FEMA emergency broadcast warn athletes to practice 
			indoors or not at all? 
					
					What about pregnant women, why were they not 
			given precautionary measures? 
			A word about the energy industry: technology suppression is the name 
			of the game.  
			  
			How else do you maintain an energy monopoly?  
			  
			If
			
			Stan 
			Meyer’s water car or the Japanese production 
			
			water car had ever made 
			it to market, lot’s of super rich energy barons would have lost all 
			their power and money: 
				
				history proves they will stop at nothing to 
			maintain this monopoly. 
			Why are solar cells restricted if they are more than 20% efficient? 
			Why are power systems greater than 70% efficient restricted?
 Just consider how difficult it is to control a nuclear chain 
			reaction that boils water, turning a turbine and generating 
			electricity.
 
			  
			Einstein once said:  
				
				‘Nuclear power is a hell of a way 
			to boil water!’. 
			But what if you could turn your home into a solar 
			generating station and bypass these monopolies?
 What if there were clean energy, but it was not in a form that could 
			be easily monopolized? What if the dirty and dangerous energy 
			sources were the ones the elite could control, thus explaining why 
			we continue to suffer from incidents like 
			
			the BP Gulf Oil Disaster, 
			
			Three Mile Island or
			
			Fukushima and why solar cells are restricted to 
			20% efficiency.
 
 Telling the truth about all this is very dangerous. A Japanese 
			research scientist was recently found ‘suicided’ with a plastic bag 
			over his head after posting results of his tests online. There are 
			others who have died under mysterious circumstances as well.
 
 In any case, the emails and conference call transcripts reveal the 
			cover up, there can be no other conclusion-even with heavy 
			redaction-the plan was to do everything possible to limit the public 
			knowledge and paint as positive a picture as possible.
 
 Saving the nuclear industry was paramount. Talking points were (are) 
			a big factor. They knew the plume was coming.
 
 There was no effort to warn Americans. No one told folks to stay 
			indoors, or to not be out jogging or playing sports, not even the 
			first 3-4 weeks when the heaviest amounts were raining down on us.
 
 Obama and family 
			
			spent some time in South America around the 18th of 
			March, so they were safe during the worst of the plume.
 
				
					
					
					But what 
			about the rest of us? 
					
					And what about the agencies involved that 
			conspired to hide this from the American public? 
					
					Agencies whose 
			purpose is to protect Americans?
					
					Is their real purpose just the opposite? 
					
					
					To protect the corporate 
			and protect the state at all costs? 
					
					What about all the press 
			agencies and ‘alternative’ media that remains silent on these 
			matters… they have access to the emails and transcripts like anyone 
			else….are they bought and paid for? 
					
					Are they afraid? 
			Credit must be given to 
			Enformable.com for posting the original 
			editorials and to the Intel Hub who had the courage and patriotism 
			to run the article and place it on the headline ticker.
 Only the 
			
			
			Alexander Higgins blog has followed suit. Everyone else in 
			the mainstream and ‘alternative’ media is silent.
 
 Coincidentally, the Wikileaks document dump and Qur’an burning are 
			taking center stage while the cover-up that killed over 18,000 
			unborn infants is not.
 
			  
			So, 
				
					
					
					Who can you trust in the media? 
					
					
					Who can 
			you trust in the ‘alternative’ media?
					
					Considering the far reaching implications of ‘Plume-Gate’, the 
			cover-up, the infant deaths and the election year we find ourselves 
			in, can you trust a source unwilling to speak about this grave 
			matter?
					
					Is it possible the ‘alternative’ media has been co-opted, 
			infiltrated and corrupted to a large degree?  
			It is this author’s 
			opinion that any media source not shouting about Plume-Gate as loud 
			as they can are likely controlled by the powers-that-be.
 Those sources are the most dangerous, the ones who gain your 
			confidence by broadcasting the truth for years only to deceive you 
			at the final moment when it will hurt you the most. So who do you 
			trust?
 
 In the words of the famous philosopher J. Krishnamurti, maybe its 
			time we should ‘think on these things’.
 
 
			  
			
			FOIA Documents
 
			Please take the time to examine both the 
			
			395 page 
			document and the
			
			186 page document in order to more fully comprehend 
			the nature of the cover-up. All of this information has been 
			forwarded to both mainstream and ‘alternative” media sources.
 
			  
			  |