| 
			 
 
 
			
			by Patrick Henningsen 
 
 
 
			 
 But evidence strongly suggests that something very serious has in fact happened there. On June 7th, there was a fire reported at Fort Calhoun. The official story is that the fire was in an electrical switchgear room at the plant. 
 
			The apparently facility lost power to a pump that cools the 
			spent fuel rod pool, allegedly for a duration of approximately 90 
			minutes. 
 
 
 
 
 
			 
 
			This notification was issued because the Missouri River’s 
			water level reached an alarming 42.5 feet. Apparently, Cooper 
			Station is advising that it is unable to discharge sludge into the 
			Missouri River due to flooding, and therefore “overtopped” its 
			sludge pond. 
 The FAA restrictions were reportedly down to “hazards” and were ‘effectively immediately’, and ‘until further notice’. 
 
			Yet, according to the NRC, 
			there’s no cause for the public to panic. 
 
 
			 
 
			Nearby 
			town 
			
			Council Bluffs has already implemented its own three tier 
			warning system should residents be prepared to leave the area 
			quickly. 
 A Level 4 emergency would constitute an, 
 
			According to the seven-level 
			International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES), a Level 4 
			incident requires at least one death, which has not occurred 
			according to available reports. 
 
 
 Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen explains how cooling pumps must operate continuously, 
			even years after a 
			plant is shut down. 
			According a recent report on the 
			
			People’sVoice website, The Ft. Calhoun plant - which stores its fuel 
			rods at ground level 
			
			according to Tom Burnett - is now partly 
			submerged and Missouri River levels are expected to rise further 
			before the summer if finished, local reports in and around the Fort 
			Calhoun Nuclear Plant suggest that the waters are expected to rise 
			at least 5 more feet. 
 The People’s Voice’s report explains how Ft Calhoun and Fukushima share some of the very same high-risk factors: 
 
			Conventional wisdom about what makes for 
			a safe location regarding nuclear power facilities was turned on its 
			head this year following Japan’s Fukushima disaster following the 
			earthquake and tsunami which ravaged the region and triggered one of 
			the planets worst-ever nuclear meltdowns. 
 
			The Nebraska 
			facility houses around 600,000 - 800,000 pounds of spent fuel that 
			must be constantly cooled to prevent it from starting to boil, so 
			the reported 90 minute gap in service should raise alarm bells. 
 
 
 
 Nebraska’s nuclear plant’s similarities to Japan’s Fukushima, both were store houses for years of spent nuclear fuel rods. 
 In addition to all this, there are eyewitness reports of odd military movements, including unmarked vehicles and soldiers. 
 
			Should a radiation accident occur, most 
			certainly extreme public controls would be enacted by the military, 
			not least because this region contains some of the country’s key 
			environmental, transportation and military assets. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
			RISK - Levees in and 
			around Omaha were not designed for 3 months of water Angela Tague at Business Gather reports also that the recent Midwest floods may seriously impact food and gas prices. Lost farmland may be behind the price spike to $7.55 a bushel for corn, already twice last year’s price. 
 Tague notes also: 
 One of the lessons we can learn for Japan’s tragic Fukushima disaster is that the government’s choice to impose a media blackout on information around the disaster may have already cost thousands of lives. 
 
			Only time will tell the scope the disaster and how many 
			victims it will claim. 
 
			Especially up 
			for inspection are those of 40 year old facilities like Ft Calhoun 
			in the US, strangely being re-licensed for operation past 2030. Many 
			of these facilities serve little on the electrical production front, 
			and are more or less “bomb factories” that produce material for 
			nuclear weapons and 
			depleted uranium munitions. 
  |