by Jacco van der Worp
07 September 2003

from Yowusa Website


The month of September 2003 will see an exciting but also scary event take place. Nobody on Earth can tell you for certain what the outcome will be, yet NASA is pushing it ahead with full steam in what could very well become a mistake of Titanic proportions for all of humankind. This is because they will hurl the spent satellite Galileo deep into Jupiter’s atmosphere to a supposedly ‘safe’ but fiery grave.


However this planet is not Earth where our concern has been that Galileo's Plutonium could fill our lungs with radioactivity were it to reenter our atmosphere. However, this is not a concern because Galileo will be entering Jupiter’s atmosphere instead. So what!


Jupiter is the giant catcher of the Solar system, so why should we be concerned? While it is a giant catcher, it is also the largest pressure cooker of our solar system and it could crush Galileo’s 48 pounds of Plutonium.


The result could be a Jovian Nagasaki with dire consequences for humankind.


The Galileo Mission

NASA’s Galileo mission is coming to an end. Galileo was launched back in 1989 from the Space Shuttle Atlantis, its mission was to explore Jupiter and its moons. As September 2003 progresses, the satellite will be maneuvered into a controlled descent into the atmosphere of Jupiter; there it will find its grave on September 21, 2003.


Galileo was sent out to explore Jupiter and its moons and returned some most interesting results to us.

It found water on the moon Europa, which has a global ocean under a thick layer of ice. Because this moon has a good chance of harboring some primitive life forms, NASA planned the controlled crashing of Galileo into the atmosphere of Jupiter.


NASA does not want it to accidentally crash into Europa. Why is such a controlled crash necessary?


The Radioisotope Thermal Generator (RTG)

The reason for crashing Galileo into the planet Jupiter on purpose is this: Galileo since its launch has been powered by Plutonium-238 in a RTG or Radioisotope Thermal Generator. Plutonium-238 decays via alpha and gamma emission, its daughter products are also highly radioactive for a long time.


An RTG catches this radiation in a heat exchanging mechanism and there converts it into electricity. Duracell doesn’t make batteries like that. These RTG power units can power a satellite for many years. They powered the Pioneer and Voyager craft too or they would not have lasted three decades as they did.

Now, an independent researcher/writer by the name of J.C. Goliathan gathered some interesting information on the fuel load.

TIPS Report – August, 2003
J.C. Goliathan, July 30, 2003

The author believes the nuclear events reported here to be very unlikely and only remotely possible, but just as an asteroid impact with earth is remotely possible (and widely researched and reported on), the Jupiter impact issue deserves exposure also, because there is compelling evidence to suggest the feasibility of at least a temporary Jupiter ignition.


Given the potential consequences of this, serious research is warranted. The author is a Geographer and Engineer, not a physicist. Further research is needed by more qualified individuals.

While Goliathan’s might be a bit technical for those outside of his field of study, as a physicist, I found it to be a brilliant piece of work and so will endeavor to explain the critical aspects presented in his article in layman’s terms.


The Concerns Described in Goliathan’s Article

Theoretically the avalanche reaction described for the Pu-238 pellets aboard Galileo can take place setting off an implosion-induced nuclear detonation. Literally no one on Earth knows for certain what will happen when Galileo plunges into Jupiter. It may even trigger an on-going fusion reaction in the abundant hydrogen supply of Jupiter, creating a mini-star. We lack the in-depth knowledge on the atmospheric structure of the planet to accurately predict the outcome, yet we push ahead on the chosen path.

Physicists at NASA will undoubtedly tell you the danger is negligible and try and push this question into the realm of conspiracy-thinking. As a physicist, I’ve been trained in the safe application of radiation and I think we need to pay attention here, as we may be overplaying our hand by ignoring this possibility.

In my work I do risk analysis regularly. In such an analysis I divide potentially hazardous risks into a matrix. This type of matrix sorts risks by chance of occurring (on a 1 to 6 scale for likeliness) on one scale against the severity (on a 1 to 5 scale) on the other. The product of these two is known as the hazard of the event. Anything with a product of chance and severity above 12 requires ‘mitigating action’, but special attention is due also for the highest severity category, regardless of its chance.

This particular risk falls in that category of highest severity, it has to be looked at. Its chance is minute, but no matter how small the risk, its consequences are so severe and all-encompassing that we must not ignore it! I will tell a little more about why they are so great below.


This Is All About Plutonium!

Plutonium-238 is a bit of a rogue isotope in the Plutonium family. It is the “least wanted” of the isotopes of Plutonium for energy production in nuclear plants or even the use in nuclear bombs. We’ll go into why that is here.

We start with a schematic buildup of a simple Plutonium implosion bomb as depicted in the figure below.

Figure 1: Plutonium implosion bomb principle


It uses a sphere of a few kilograms of fissile Plutonium, which is surrounded by a layer of Uranium. Around that are a few layers of chemical explosive. This schematic is very important for what the concern among many physicists is about.

Plutonium does have spontaneous fission, I will get back to that below, it is especially interesting in this particular case. On fission, atoms fall apart in two or more chunks and a few high energy neutrons, atom shrapnel really. These neutrons are shot away in random directions. If they hit other atoms of Plutonium like a bowling ball hits the pins, these may start splitting as well because of the impact. In a sphere of only a few pounds these neutrons don’t encounter enough Plutonium atoms to have enough chance of breaking one up.


More Plutonium is needed for that.

About plutonium bombs

Critical mass

Critical masses can be calculated quite accurately. The important parameters are fission cross sections, the average neutron yield upon fission, and the mass density. The latter depends heavier on the integrity of the metal lattice than on the isotopic composition, since mass differences between the different plutonium isotopes are almost negligible.

Without a neutron reflecting shield, pure Pu-239 metal has a critical mass of 10 kg , and I have calculated that for a "reactor grade" isotopic mixture this would be 18 kg. Using a 15 cm U-238 shield, the Pu-239 critical mass is only slightly over 4 kg, while for LWR - produced plutonium (65% thermal fissile isotopes, fuel burn up around 40 MWd/kg HM) this is some 7 kg.

The critical mass of Plutonium-239 to start a chain reaction without help is about 10 kilograms. With that much Plutonium, the chance of a neutron from the middle hitting an atom on its way out is high enough to keep the reaction going or even speed it up. Plutonium is easy enough to gather, but you can’t control an amount like this at all.


That is why in a bomb there is a layer of Uranium around it, this acts like a neutron mirror, it sends neutrons right back in for another pass through the Plutonium, only 2 to 4 kilograms of that is necessary this way. That by itself is still not enough though but keeps the Plutonium from going off by itself.

If the chemical explosive is set off exactly simultaneously, a shockwave will travel inward, compressing the Uranium shell and the Plutonium so far inward that the atoms move much closer together. So much closer in fact that the two or three neutrons coming out of every atom splitting up split at least another atom of Plutonium. The reaction becomes self-sustaining. This principle is the principle by which a nuclear power plant works. By ‘catching away’ neutrons the balance point of one-splits-one is kept in-tact. The rest of the free neutrons will crash into water and gives of its energy boiling the water to steam.

If the shockwaves pushes further in still, then more than one other atom will be split by the resulting neutrons of an atom splitting up. An avalanche starts to build. This avalanche creates so much energy that a counter wave starts pushing outward overcoming the inward shockwave in an instant. The result is the notorious mushroom-shaped cloud we all so dread.

Now we get back to the special isotope of Plutonium in use in the RTGs of Galileo. From the same site there is a table listing the various isotopes and their (re-)activity.


Pu "mixture"

Pu vector


SF rate





















Source: About plutonium bombs

The 3,440 neutrons per gram per seconds of Pu-238 are the real reason for concern. If you compare them to the 0.03 neutrons that spontaneously come out of one gram of Pu-239 it will become obvious that the critical mass (the mass at which the reaction inside the Plutonium becomes self sustaining) is much smaller for Pu-238 than it is for Pu-239. Neutrons travel in every direction, as a result the difference in SF rate will work in all direction too.


This leads to a critical mass of roughly 200 grams for Pu-238 only. This is why NASA used 144 pellets of 1/3 pounds (151 grams) to get the 48 pounds on board of Galileo. These pellets are shielded from one another to prevent them from going out of control. The crucial question is what will happen to these pellets and their shielding when the satellite plunges into the atmosphere of Jupiter. Will the shielding hold? Will the pellets stay together or wander apart? NASA appears to hope they wander apart or quickly burn up completely (what with, as there is almost no oxygen to burn them up?).

If the pellets stay together and are compressed ever stronger by the increasing atmospheric pressure they encounter (they will keep on falling until the outside specific weight or weight per volume matches that on the inside!!) each pellet will by itself go beyond the critical point density and chain-react.


The true danger is if several ones or all of them were to go supercritical together. In that case you have 48 pounds of Pu-238 going into chain reaction.




Chain Reaction

In the bombing of Nagasaki, the Americans used only 7 kilograms of Plutonium. 1.2 kilograms of that went into fission, which gave the explosion a equivalent force of 22 kilotons of TNT.





Hypothetical, LWR Pu

1-20 kton

~ 5-7 kg RG Pu

0.05-1 kg

Trinity test, 1945

20 kton 

~ 6 kg WG Pu

1 kg

Totem I test, 1953 

12 kton 

~ 80% Pu-fis

0.7 kg

Hiroshima, 1945

12 kton

~ 50 kg HEU*

0.7 kg

Nagasaki, 1945

22 kton

~ 7 kg WG Pu

1.2 kg

Thermonuclear bomb

~ 1000 kton



Source: About plutonium bombs

Not all of the Plutonium did fission, because after a small part of it had gone into fission, the outward pressure of that energy release caused the rest to become spread out, making it go sub-critical again. If you have a block of Pu-238 sinking into the atmosphere of Jupiter, the atmosphere will compress it ever stronger, the outward pressure will have a lot more trouble overcoming this compression, in the worst case all of the Pu-238 might go into reaction.


If we extrapolate the table above linearly, about 18-20 ktons are released per kilogram of Plutonium fully fissioned, then a maximum explosive yield of some 400 ktons could come from 48 pounds or 21.7 kg of Plutonium.

Not all of the Plutonium will go of course, the explosive energy will be much lower, but 100 ktons lies well within possibility. In an explosion of that magnitude, what could be the temperature that is reached?


"The world enters the nuclear era"

by Antonino Spoto

Planning, use and consequences of the first atomic bombs.

If in half kilogram of uranium every atom had to split up, the energy produced will be equal to the explosive power of 10.000 tons of TNT. In this hypothetical case, the efficiency of the explosion would be of 100%; in the first tests of the A bomb, this efficiency was never reached. For the detonation of the atomic bombs have been set more or less sophisticated launchings systems.


In the simplest system, a bullet of fissile material is shot against a target of the same material, in way that the two masses are united in a supercritical whole. The atomic bomb exploded in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, was a weapon of this type, of the power of around 20 kilotons.

A most complex method, said "implosion", is used in a weapon of spherical conformation. The most external part of the sphere consists of a layer of lenses of common high potential explosive, prepared in way to assemble the explosion toward the center of the bomb (implosion). At the center, there is a core of fissile material that is compressed to the inside by the powerful wave of direct pressure; the density of the metal results increased with consequent production of a supercritical configuration.


The bomb of the test of Alamogordo and also that dropped over Nagasaki on August 9 1945, both with a power of 20 kilotons, they were of the implosion type. Independently from the method used for getting a supercritical whole, the chain reaction proceeds for around a millionth of second, freeing enormous quantities of thermal energy. The so rapid liberation of such energy in a small volume increases instantly the temperature to about ten million of degrees.


The rapid expansion and vaporization of the material that constitutes the bomb gives origin to an explosion of extreme power.

After only a millionth of a second, the pressure causing the implosion was overcome above Nagasaki. If such an explosion were to take place in the Jovian atmosphere instead of Earth’s, the outside pressure would resist the expansion a lot longer! The chain reaction could continue longer, up to three times as long perhaps, as high as 30-50% fission rate could be achieved instead of 16% and the reaction temperature could shoot up to beyond 100 million degrees.

The threshold temperature for sustained fusion is not as high as that. The exact conditions for fusion depend on a product of pressure, temperature and amount of atom nuclei able and ‘willing’ to fuse together (isotopes of hydrogen with neutrons in them and helium missing a neutron) into other atom nuclei.

The Sun is estimated to have a core temperature of 15 million degrees. It runs on fusion and the pressure inside amounts to millions of bars. Chemically, the Sun and Jupiter are not that different: the Sun also mainly holds hydrogen and helium. The pressure inside Jupiter will then determine if a fusion reaction can start up due to a nuclear explosion. If the product of pressure and temperature and number of fuseable nuclei is reached, a fusion reaction will start.

The moment fusion starts, all bets are off. There is no telling what will happen then, if the fusion will sustain itself or fizzle out again and how long that will take. Is Jupiter heavy enough to keep the reaction going?


It is not heavy enough to have spontaneous fusion or we would have a binary star system already, but 200 ktons may provide the trigger it cannot provide itself.


The Possible Result of a Jupiter Ignition

If Jupiter ignites, it may throw out a portion of its atmosphere in a shockwave as most starting stars do. This starting star however will then be too close for comfort. A portion of that shockwave will then hit Earth too, its results will be beyond imagination.


Millions of tons of hot hydrogen will impact the atmosphere hitting it with 1000 km per second. It will result in an ELE category event at best due to intense global aurora and a bombardment of X-rays everywhere that may last for days to weeks. The survivors will be sterile or die from all kinds of radiation-induced diseases.

After Marshall Masters’ latest article CONTACT! Canadian Crop Circle Researcher Matt Rock Identifies the Constellation Pisces as Point of Origin for English Formations we had one of our many chats on ICQ, as a bit of discussion, or brainstorming sometimes.


I’ll quote from that chat:

Jacco: I wonder why now, why now make contact. On the other hand it's logical..

Marshall: We are on the verge of taking weapons into space. They have to contact us now. This is not optional.

Jacco: Taking weapons into space... no. We're about to dump a spent nuclear fuel reactor into Jupiter. Without properly realizing what the consequence may be.

Marshall: Now you've got it. this is a good tie in for your article.

Jacco: If things really hit the worst scenario, we are going to f***ing wipe ourselves out this way... Brings to mind one of the big scenes of T2, the moment before Linda Hamilton dozes off. The boy and the Terminator are packing and they see a couple kids playing war... The boy says to the machine:" We're not going to make it, are we?.."

Marshall: Yes. Now you're seeing something because we now have the ability to create havoc in the cosmos.

Jacco: Havoc... Kill most life in our Solar system. Europa would be gone, Mars would be toasted and we'd be on the verge of extinction ourselves.

It hit both of us almost at the same time, basically the circles started appearing the moment the Galileo mission headed on a one way trip to Jupiter back in 1989. It may be a coincidence, but it is an uncanny one for sure. A logical approach could be: if you were quietly watching and studying a seemingly intelligent and self-aware alien life form doing something this stupid to its environment, would you tell them?


The answer to that may very well be lying in the crop fields around the world.


NASA Is Taking an Titanic Risk

Let’s all keep in mind that NASA has lost two shuttle crews because of its own internal political problems. This is not an enviable track record and it would send any commercially viable international air carrier into immediate bankruptcy. However, NASA does not have to justify itself to paying customers and stockholders, and so the void between taxpayers and politically-minded administrators is both huge and dangerous.

That being said, NASA decision to hurl the spent Galileo spacecraft along with its plutonium could be the worst. Sending Galileo into an environment mankind does not know enough about is equal to playing Russian roulette on a planetary scale. This to me is truly unbelievable, it should be unacceptable to everyone in the world!

NASA does not know, nor can it know, how long the satellite will last in the Jovian atmosphere, how high the pressure on the Plutonium will rise and whether the Plutonium will be crushed together to form one mass or stay apart in pellets. Still they are taking the risk of plunging Galileo into Jupiter. There cannot be a scientific base for it other than guesswork.

So, what if nothing happens. After all the statistics favor NASA’s decision – for now.

There is only one bullet in the pistol cylinder but if you pull the trigger often enough, you’ll die, for sure. NASA has pulled the trigger a few times already , so far nothing happened.


The Plutonium bullet however may now be up in the chamber. If this goes wrong, even though the chance of it is remote at best, it will affect all of us, not just NASA.