| 
			
 
 
  
			by Steve Johnson  
			San Jose Mercury News 
			December 25, 2013 
			from
			
			MSNNews Website 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			
			 
			This X-ray depicts 
			the hands of Amal Graafstra, founder of Dangerous Things. 
			 
			He has had two radio 
			frequency identifier implants in his hands  
			which he uses to 
			unlock his car, computer and door to his Seattle home.  
			MCT: Courtesy of Amal 
			Graafstra 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			The move to outfit people with 
			devices  
			that can be swallowed, 
			implanted or attached  
			could revolutionize the way 
			people interact  
			with devices and one another 
			
 
			The move to outfit people with 
			electronic devices that can be swallowed, implanted or attached to 
			skin could revolutionize health care and change the way people 
			interact with devices and one another.
 It's likely the world in the not-so-distant future will be 
			increasingly populated by computerized people like Amal Graafstra.
 
 The 37-year-old doesn't need a key or password to get into his car, 
			home or computer. He's programmed them to unlock at the mere wave of 
			his hands, which are implanted with radio frequency identification 
			tags.
 
			  
			The rice-size gadgets work so well, the 
			Seattle resident says, he's sold similar ones to more than 500 
			customers through his company Dangerous Things.
 The move in the Bay Area and beyond to outfit people with electronic 
			devices that can be swallowed, implanted in their bodies or attached 
			to their skin via "smart tattoos" could revolutionize health care 
			and change the way people interact with devices and one another.
 
			  
			Critics call the trend intrusive, even 
			sacrilegious. But others say it ultimately will make life better for 
			everybody.  
			  
			Some researchers and executives envision 
			a day when devices placed in people will enable them to control 
			computers, prosthetic devices and many other things solely with 
			their thoughts. 
				
				"In the next 10 to 20 years we will 
				see rapid development in bioengineered and man-machine 
				interfaces," predicted Graafstra, who wrote a book about the 
				technology, adding that the trend is going to "push the 
				boundaries of what it means to be human." 
			Companies and researchers are keenly 
			interested in the topic.
 In a patent application made public in November, Google's Motorola 
			Mobility branch proposed an "electronic skin tattoo" for the throat 
			- with a built-in microphone, battery and wireless transceiver - 
			that would let someone operate other devices via voice commands.
 
 When asked, Google said it often seeks patents on employee 
			brainstorms and that, while,
 
				
				"some of those ideas later mature 
				into real products or services, some don't."  
			But Google CEO Larry Page 
			apparently is intrigued with enhancing people electronically.  
			  
			A 2011 book about the Mountain View 
			search giant quoted him saying,  
				
				"eventually you'll have an implant, 
				where if you think about a fact, it will just tell you the 
				answer." 
			  
			 
			Implantable 
			technology proponent Amal Graafstra of Seattle  
			demonstrates how one 
			of the doors to his home can be unlocked 
			 just by passing 
			either of his hands past a sensor which reads the signal  
			from a RFID chip 
			implanted in each of his hands. 
			MCT: Courtesy of Amal 
			Graafstra
 
 
			Similar notions are under study by 
			others, including UC Berkeley researchers. In a scholarly paper 
			published in July, they proposed implanting people's brains with 
			thousands of tiny sensors they called "neural dust."
 The idea initially is to have the little circuits gather detailed 
			data on brain functions.
 
			  
			But eventually, lead researcher 
			Dongjin Seo said, the electronic swarms may prove useful for, 
				
				"controlling devices via thought" or 
				stimulating malfunctioning brain regions to restore "limb motor 
				control for paralyzed patients." 
			Among the most widely anticipated uses 
			for implants, smart pills and electronic tattoos are medical.
 In October, Stanford doctors implanted the brain of a Parkinson's 
			disease sufferer with a new device that gathers detailed data on the 
			"neural signatures" of his illness. They hope to use the information 
			to make a gadget that will ease Parkinson's symptoms with electrical 
			impulses that adjust to any activity the patients do.
 
 Last year, Proteus Digital Health of Redwood City, Calif., 
			won approval to sell a pill that relays information about a person's 
			vital signs via a mobile phone to their doctor. And officials at 
			Santa Clara, California-based Intel envision their microchips 
			one day in devices ingested or implanted for medical and other uses.
 
 Some fear implants might become mandatory for health insurance or 
			jobs.
 
 After learning about a Cincinnati video surveillance firm that 
			required employees to have a chip inserted in them, California Sen.
			Joe Simitian introduced a bill that became law in 2008 
			forbidding anyone in this state from making similar demands.
 
 Two years later, when the Virginia House of Delegates passed a 
			similar measure, some of the lawmakers - citing biblical 
			references about the Antichrist - denounced implanted chips 
			as "the mark of the beast."
 
 It's unclear how widespread those concerns are.
 
			  
			A study Intel made public this month 
			found that 70 percent of the 12,000 adults it surveyed were 
			receptive to having their health data collected by various means, 
			including "swallowed monitors."
 Nonetheless, Intel futurist Brian David Johnson thinks the 
			public initially will be more amenable to smart tattoos than 
			computerized pills or gadgets inserted into them, because "something 
			on your skin, that's a baby step" compared to a swallowed or 
			surgically implanted device.
 
 One tattoo being developed by MC10 of Cambridge, Mass., would 
			temporarily attach to the skin like an adhesive bandage and 
			wirelessly transmit the wearer's vital signs to a phone or other 
			device.
 
			  
			The company, which has a contract for a 
			military version, plans to introduce one next year for consumers, 
			according to MC10 official Barry Ives Jr. who touted its use 
			for, 
				
				"athletes, expectant and new moms, 
				and the elderly." 
			In a recent patent application, Finnish 
			phone-maker Nokia proposed a tattoo that would vibrate when the 
			person gets a phone call or serve as a mobile-device password and 
			attach to the skin with "ferromagnetic powder."
 Other envisioned gadgets would go under the skin.
 
 MICROCHIPS of Lexington, Mass., recently reported success testing a 
			microchip implanted waist high that automatically provided daily 
			doses of medicine to osteoporosis patients.
 
			  
			In February, regulators approved an eye 
			implant by Second Sight Medical Products of Sylmar that lets 
			the visually impaired see shapes and movements transmitted to the 
			implant from a camera on their glasses. And University of Southern 
			California scientists are studying implanted chips to restore 
			memories in people with dementia, strokes or other brain damage.
 Among the critical issues to be resolved is how to keep implanted 
			devices updated with the latest software, maintain their battery 
			power and shield them hackers.
 
			  
			But Eric Dishman, who heads 
			Intel's health care innovation team, predicts the gadgets - 
			particularly those providing health benefits - will become common 
			some day. 
				
				"There's going to be an ecosystem of 
				things on and in the body," he predicted, adding, "this is the 
				ultimate in personalized medicine." 
			  
			  |