January 16, 2009
from TheCanadian Website
Many scientists suggests,
elites spread two campaigns of mass
deception on Global Warming.
Have you noticed on the both sides of the Global Warming debate, there are two groups of very wealthy elites? We can perhaps readily appreciate the "no" side's motivation. This group is tied to large Petroleum and other interests.
But the "yes, there is Global Warming
side", that suggest that our planet Earth is on an unabated trend to
heating up, is also tied to wealthy interests. Follow the money, and
the trail seems to lead to an apparent interlocking clique with
common ties to a reputed "Globalist Hegemony".
The apparent answer to this conundrum suggested by scientists whose voices have been repressed, is that both sides are seeking to deceive humanity.
Bill McGuire is Benfield Professor of Geophysical Hazards and director of the Benfield Hazard Research Centre at University College London has been among scientists who suggest that Global Warming will create a trigger point, that will subvert the salinization of Gulf Stream currents. (see clip of film "The Day After Tomorrow" with same 'suggestion')
The result would be the triggering of an ice age.
Yale's Global Online correspondingly documents the following:
Imagine vast stretches of Europe and North America under a permanent winter, that in the process destroys agricultural production, resulting in mass famine.
Dr. McGuire and other scientists suggest that we are dangerously entering that scientifically predicated triggering point.
A possible key to appreciating this triggering mechanism, are insights from ancient and indigenous people which suggest that our Earth is not simply a large clump of mostly "rock" orbiting in space.
Instead such cultures conceive of
our planet as an actual
living entity, where humanity and other biological entitles are
spiritually interconnected with each other.
Aboriginal wisdoms inspire a context of appreciating the "body of Earth" as having the biological mechanism of cooling off, to prevent the kind of apparent scenario of unabated heating, by the "yes" side.
Experts warn that 3,000ft ice sheets could cover most
Scientists suggest that the "Global Warming" thesis of unabated warming, was constructed to turn public attention away from arguably the even less palatable scenario of suffering from mass starvation in a permanent winter, instead of the scenario of simply being somewhat "uncomfortably" warm, but still having access to food.