last review 31 August 2008
----- Original Message
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:20 PM
Subject: Freedom and Free Will are excellent natural
rights of mankind, and the awakening of Consciousness is
a priority and essential to our Evolution in the
This is at the heart of both our enjoyment and our
repression, because there will always be a force that is
determined that the masses don't deserve it. What they
don't understand is that without these, we cannot
survive as a race. And with these we will always
struggle to achieve freedom and free will, because of
the great responsibility that comes with both. It is
I have been struggling to understand what those who are
here in our skies are really up to. They do not make it
easy to understand. Add to that the denial humans pile
on top both within the masses and the governments or
power structures and you have a very difficult problem
to understand. I know this much with certainty, they are
intimately responding to our political/military strategy
and implementation. Whether this is for our benefit,
benign or their favor only is yet unclear.
The messengers that say
they are in contact with them also say they are here for
our benefit. I am not so sure that it is wise to take
that at face value without confirmation. If we were
going to another planet, is that the way we would allow
ourselves to be known? Through coercive manipulation of
the militaries, crop circles and projecting our intent
through messengers? Wouldn't it make more sense to work
through the political and policy structure of that
planet? Otherwise, how would it have any validity?
Don't we have a validity problem with UFO?
Our global higher institutions do not recognize it as a
valid issue. Global policy makers may have it on their
agenda, but it will be related to global security or
global sovereignty. The political structure is quiet on
the real issues they are certainly aware of after 65
years of intense activity and study. Sure they release
files from time to time in different countries, but it
is like throwing scraps to the dogs.
They eat it up and are
distracted and satiated. But the real disturbing and
important findings are being held under strict
classification. At the same time I am not convinced that
the bright minds within these circles have it figured
out - because they are being thrown scraps as well - by
those who are here in our skies. It is a low level
stand-off, a dilemma. But to everyone involved including
the masses, it is not truly "official" and openly
recognized or dealt with.
Do you think that someone who approaches us (our race)
in this manor can truly be trusted?
Do you think this is a wise approach?
I am all for enlightenment. It is our gift that we can
be enlightened, but it is also our responsibility as to
how we achieve that individually and as a race. So far
our record overall is not that good. But there are many
pockets of hope, and this is what keeps up moving
forward. I don't think we were meant to have outside
help on enlightenment other than that creator (whoever
that is). It is our responsibility. It is our will. this
is why we have free will - to achieve those things
individually and together.
Another important issue is that our religious
institutions do not officially recognize the visitors.
Now that could be because of the structure, the dogma,
the leadership will not allow it. And that could apply
to our higher institutions and our governments. Is it
bad to hesitate as they seem to be doing? Or is it wise
to wait for the appropriate approach/contact and in the
meantime, be extremely skeptical and cautious?
If you were in charge, would you throw open your arms to
the visitors after hearing the messengers of the world?
I think there is plenty of evidence that indicates that
we should be extremely cautious.
Our nuclear weapons infrastructure has been thoroughly
surveyed and at certain specific times relating to
policy, tampered with. Other aspects of our weapons
infrastructure have been tampered with and we have been
clearly shown the superiority involved.
Do we just ignore that and open our arms?
There is no clear answer here. Not yet. In the meantime,
I don't think we can look to our political leadership
for answers, nor do I think they should be less than
Maybe the visitors are here for our benefit. Maybe their
way of getting themselves known is one that has merit. I
still think caution is warranted by our governments.
Until we know - you and I - we should be cautious too.
All the best,
Do UFO respond to our political will in
the arena of nuclear weapons?
It is inevitable to compare the onset of
prolific UFO activity of the last 60 or so years to our acquiring
nuclear weapons capability. In making that comparison it is
essential to realize the possibility that an historical relationship
could exist, and to at least perform a study to make that
determination. This paper’s primary goal is the introduction of the
historical correlative concept and represents a small sample of such
This paper also provides topic
organizational structure allowing the data to be collected in a
fashion that is easily applied to historical research. Although much
progress has been made towards firming this approach, not all topics
have received correlative attention as of this writing.
Why choose military sighting data?
The significance of military sightings
is imbedded in the high quality of the observation and
documentation, the consistency of the types of activity, and most
important, the notice taken by the chain of command. Engaging the
military of a state is the most direct way of getting attention –
all the way to the top.
It is apparent that direct contact with
leaders of states today is rare or probably nonexistent. Any
sighting at or near to a state’s capital should therefore be treated
as extremely significant. Most normal UFO activity occurs in
fashions not meant to attract attention, such as in the guise of
night or in remote areas, or so brief in length as to make it nearly
impossible to ascertain anything from the sighting.
When discovered, UFO usually end any
observation by leaving quickly. Yet military engagement is direct,
specific in type and location, often having duration indicating the
intent to acquire full attention.
Repetition of specific activities
related to military could very well be attempts to relate or
demonstrate clear superiority, concern over policy/decisions, and,
with the more aggressive activity, a conveyance of warnings. That
cannot be ignored as a distinct possibility. This is the case with
UFO activity related directly to nuclear technology, weaponry and
the associated political prowess.
What does this have to do with a possible historical relationship?
Evidence supports this relationship. The
location and the timing of many of these sightings are coincident
with historical events within the related realm, whether that is
conventional conflict or specific aspects of nuclear policy and
militarization. This does not apply just to the US. There is much to
be learned by applying an orderly study of this relationship both in
conventional military conflict and nuclear militarization globally.
Introducing this historical relational concept in a convincing
manner to the general populace would require a fairly extensive set
of consistent examples. When looking at the complex history of the
last 60 years, the task becomes daunting.
However, setting specific categories and
building examples for each with consideration of pertinent global
military actions helps simplify this significantly. The separation
between “conventional” and “nuclear” strategy/decisions during the
various conflicts must be maintained at all times. The
“conventional” military actions have related UFO activities which
likely carry with them an agenda differing from that of “nuclear”
related UFO activities.
While the results from each category may not stand firm
statistically, applied together the composition with their patterns
of behavior become more revealing. Over time a sense is acquired of
the types of nuclear related policies/decisions/events and the
kinds/timing of UFO activity these elicit.
Loren Gross has written about the Berlin crisis of 1948 in an
historical relational manner (NCP-01:
Some Early Patterns). There are
many more nuclear historical manifestations to draw from. Although
we lay claim to being the first to detonate atomic weapons, the
events that we are studying here in the US are not peculiar to the
US - Britain, France, the former Soviet Union (and now, Russia),
China, Israel, Pakistan, India, and probably South Africa, all
likely have had similar types of activity.
The focus of this study has only
included the first five. Of those, China and France have yielded
little information thus far. Actions of UFO related to nuclear
technology and its utilization border on predictable.
The following list represents known categories for UFO event/nuclear
historical correlative study:
Weapons Development and Manufacture
– Atomic and thermonuclear - research facilities (Los
Alamos, Sandia Labs, Lawrence Livermore) and other
This category seems straight-forward in that sightings at
these locations could be related to activity at these
facilities at the time of the sighting. It could even be as
simple as status checks or demonstrating concern through
repeated presence at facilities.
More study is needed in
this category to determine if any historical significance
exists in these incursions.
Fuel Processing Facilities
(initially Oak Ridge Tennessee then Hanford Washington -in
Hanford was the second facility built to support the
Manhattan Project. The fuel for the weapons used in Japan
came from this facility. It would be an obvious target for
surveillance and demonstration.
An event occurred at this
facility on or around the date of the Trinity Test.
Radar picked up
a fast moving oval object the size of three aircraft
carriers side by side which then began to hover over
N-Plant at 65,000 ft altitude. Six F6F's were scrambled
to the object but reached a maximum altitude of 42,000
ft, 5,000 ft above the rated ceiling of the F6F.
The pilots were forced to go
back as their engines began to fail and fuel became
dangerously low. The object then disappeared as quickly
as it came. At least twenty minutes elapsed during the
event. The object was described as "very streamlined
like a stretched-out egg and pinkish in color" and
emitting vapor from the outer edges.
The date of the occurrence
was described by Rolan Powell, one of the pilots, as
"six weeks before the Japanese surrendered aboard the
Battleship Missouri in Tokyo Bay on September 2, 1945.”
This places the sighting in the middle of July.
Living On The Edge: An American war hero's daring feats
as a navy fighter pilot, civilian test pilot, and CIA
mercenary by Byron D. Varner, privately published. Also
interviews with the author and principal, Rolan D.
Powell by Walt Andrus.
Thanks to Francis Ridge
NICAP Web Site
Long duration sightings at or
near these facilities close to such important dates can
interpreted as demonstrations. The timing of these
demonstrations often occur about significant atomic/nuclear
related events. Do they want our leaders to be cognizant of
these incursions and their importance? It is as if they are
The sighting over the Oak Ridge
facility September 18 of 1944 occurred on the same day as
the Hyde Park Accord, a secret accord between the US and
Britain [F. D. Roosevelt and W. Churchill] deciding atomic
bombing of Japan. There are many events that have occurred
over the weapons material manufacturing facilities and much
opportunity to learn the historical significance.
A side note:
In a search for information relating UFO to Hanford,
documents relating to the cleanup efforts at Hanford turned
up with information on a waste dump area officially titled
“UFO Landing Area.” It is in one of the oldest dump areas of
the reservation and adjacent to the main security
It appears, based on another person’s review of
recent aerial photos, that the cleanup is complete at that
That was an interesting find.
The titles of these various cleanup areas do not show a
theme of humor or sarcasm. The underground plume of
contaminants at the reservation is slowly working its way
toward the Columbia River.
At this time, there is not much
we can do to halt this progression.
Weapons Testing –
have test dates and locations, Space Tests-EMP
Moon N-test? (US, Britain, France and Russia)
It is likely that appearances were made at a majority of the
tests. There is film footage from the DoD that looks
suspiciously like a UFO applying surveillance during a test.
Many of these tests are available on video.
Some of these tests were demonstrations themselves for the
sake of applying pressure to the former USSR. These would be
likely candidates for demonstration activity from the UFO.
One test in particular that either was or wasn’t attempted,
was a demonstration test that was slated to occur on the
Moon. There are two accounts – one that says the Air Force
shut the project down and another that says it was launched,
intercepted and destroyed by UFO.
Tests did actually take place in space, however, in 1958 and
again in 1962 after the test moratorium was over.
These were executed to realize
the results of ionizing the
Van Allen belt with radiation.
As it turned out in a test from Johnston Island, radar,
radio communications and power were all knocked out in a
large area. This EMP (electro-magnetic pulse) affect is
known to be a useful tool in knocking out the enemies’
ability to retaliate. The possibility of an enemy’s use of EMP has become an important driver in having missile defense
Another attempted test on Johnston resulted in destruction
of the rocket on the pad and resulting plutonium
contamination of a large area around the launch facility.
Deaths have been attributed to exposure following the
Its unimaginable that we would have continued to get away
with sending these weapons into space. Between the US and
the USSR there were at least 20 tests. These were cut off
due to the danger posed to space assets,
cosmonauts, and the population as a whole (not to mention
An Outer Space Treaty was
drawn up in response to keep nuclear weapons out of space
for detonation or targeting from space. There is a good
video (below) called “Nukes in Space” (Peter Kuran) and more
information on the space tests available on the Internet.
Nukes In Space
Delivery of fissile materials via naval vessel for these
tests had UFO fly-overs. It is also likely the USS
Indianapolis and its ill-fated mission delivering the
fissile material unescorted for the Hiroshima and Nagasaki
bombings had visits by UFO.
There are survivors from that
sinking, but It seems unjustifiable interviewing them about
possible sightings during their voyage after hearing their
personal accounts of the hell they lived through.
(White Sands, Australia, Russia).
It would be consistent for UFO to monitor rocket development
both as future delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons and for
our space purposes.
Accounts exist to support this
observation. Further work is needed to provide examples.
Nuclear Threat or Standoff Conditions
- dates of US decisions or military command recommendations
to pursue the use of nuclear weapons during various
conflicts and standoffs.
It is this category that would include incursions over
Washington D.C. and other capitals throughout the world.
There are many examples to draw from. The demonstrations in
these instances would be more bold, pointed at leadership
and persistent in duration. The 1952 flap holds many
At that time we were in the midst of the Korean
war, were on schedule with development of the hydrogen bomb,
had many complex issues to consider regarding the Soviets
with their nuclear weapons development and China. China’s
involvement in the Korean War had pushed our military
command towards recommending the use of atomic weapons at
This instance had taken place in the first
months of 1951. In 1952 we had new developments involving
China over the situation in the Indo-China region. China was
once again aiding in a growing conflict that would
eventually oust the French colonial government and persist
to become the Vietnam War.
An article researched and printed
in a prominent Japanese newspaper Asahi on September 16,
1984, states that according to documents retrieved through
the FOIA, on July 16, 1952, the joint chiefs made the
recommendation to take on China utilizing atomic weapons.
Excerpts from the article as translated to English:
“The United States Department of State announced on the 14th
[September, 1984] that in its diplomatic documents, the
United States Armed Forces were concerned with the French
gradually losing in its frontline battle in the Indo-China
War. The United States was contemplating cutting resources
to the League for Vietnamese independence (The Vietnamese
army led by Ho Chi Minh), and to use nuclear weapons against
China to prevent their descending south.
It is known from the diplomatic documents released last year
, that nuclear weapons considered for use against
China by the United States when entering the Korean War. But
this is the first time that the consideration for the use of
nuclear weapons in the first Indo-China war was made public.
According to those documents, the first time that a nuclear
strike against China was considered, was on January 11, 1952
at the conference held by military representatives from the
United States, France, and England, Chairman Bradley of the
Joint Chiefs of Staffs. He suggested that, in order to halt
the southern advance of China in the Indo-China war, they
warn China about the use of nuclear weapons as being one of
their options. But, telling the method that they would use
in a retaliatory attack was considered unwise, and the
suggestion was dropped.
In the same year, on July 16, at the strategic military
conference held by the Department of State and the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, Chairman Bradley stated that it would be
difficult to halt the southern advance of China without
paralyzing their transportation systems with nuclear
It is not known at this time what the view of
President Truman was concerning this topic.”
There is evidence to support that strong connections exist
between political/military considerations of the use of
nuclear weapons and the appearance of UFO at the capitol or
other important government facilities.
Of the conflicts
since WWII, the Vietnam War has provided the largest number
of nuclear scenarios beginning in 1949, when the Chinese
began supplying arms to Ho Chi Minh.
Certainly all of the
nuclear threats and standoffs have to be studied to look for
consistent patterns before passing judgment on the 1952
D.C. correlation indicated above.
Deployment of Nuclear Bomber and
Missile Wings - US
and overseas, increased activity as a result of. (over
bombers on alert status, weapons storage, harassing bombers
on training missions, etc…) (most US locations were bases
left over from WWII).
Deployment historical documents for the US and overseas are
being utilized. Although this category is not documented
yet, many examples have been collected over the years to
suggest that correlation of activity with deployment is a
sure thing. This will be backed with data as this effort
The primary purpose of covering this topic is to
indicate a strong statistical relationship. If UFO are truly
interested in and concerned over our nuclear components as
the evidence supports, this would in itself be the
motivation for the different incursions over these bases.
Monitoring weapon types, movement and deployment would
surely be the activities they would engaged in. Another
aspect this topic uncovers is the treatment generally of our
UFO tend to engage our military aircraft
directly and boldly.
Nuclear False Alerts
- bomber fleet attacks or missile launches indicated by
early warning radar installations or satellites-occurring in
the US or USSR (with consideration of specific nuclear
related action or deployment by a country, increasing
This is one hot topic. Of course there have been many false
alerts that were of our own accord, whether equipment
malfunction, inadequate equipment design, or technology
infancy. Then there are some that probably fall completely
out of our hands, and its interesting to note what was going
on when these occurred. As an example, in the mid 1970’s,
European NATO countries were reformulating defense policy.
It made little sense to have large numbers of ground troops
in the face of a nuclear threat from the USSR. What really
made sense both economically and strategically, was to have
Eastern Europe defended by a theater of medium range nuclear
tipped missiles. The only problem was that the location of
the missiles only gave Moscow six minutes response time.
Comparing that with what the US had left a clear imbalance.
Deployment of the Pershing II missiles began in the early
eighties. Many articles about false alerts during this
period indicate the number of false alerts through 1985 is
surely in the thousands. This is difficult to verify.
Equally difficult to verify is the source of these alerts.
There are the same few explanations repeated over and over.
While this accounts for a few, what of the rest?
depth of the issue of false nuclear alerts is not explored
or exposed for reasons likely having to do with public
confidence. If UFO have had a role in keeping our defense
apparatus off balance with these staged scenarios, who in
the defense department would ever admit this?
Going back to December of 1950, about a year after Russia
had detonated its first atomic bomb, we had an alert that
looked like Russian bombers headed towards our Northeastern
coast. This was probably our first alert. The bombers faded
out on the radar screens before any detrimental action was
taken. Its interesting to note that a year after the first
detonation would have provided the Russians enough time to
assemble the weapons and to get the bombers ready for the
This is a difficult topic to get good data on. But it would
be consistent that UFO would engage the US and the Soviets
in such a fashion.
If anyone reading this is aware of
examples, please pass them along.
Missile Wing Interference
(nondestructive and limited scope demonstrations/warnings)
- with missile launch readiness or missile trajectory change,
or with test launches curtailing dummy warhead trajectory,
all demonstrating highly advanced capability we are unable
to anticipate and design to. (Both US and USSR. What else do
they have up their sleeve?)
At some point we passed the line separating the possibility
and the probability of utilizing ICBM weapons. This is a
discussion worth engaging in because it will likely reveal
that military and political will somehow changed in the
early 1960’s to elicit the bold UFO activity experienced at
the various missile bases.
It is no secret to most
individuals who have read the various publications
discussing military related UFO activity that launch
capability of limited numbers of missiles were taken offline
on a few occasions, and that launch coordinates were altered
at least once.
There was also a test launch of an Atlas ICBM with a dummy
warhead out over the Pacific in September of 1964
(Deliberate Deception: The Big Sur UFO Filming – Bob
Jacobs). This test was filmed and, upon review of the film,
officials in the airforce found a disk entering into the
frames, circling the warhead, shooting a laser like beam at
four separate locations on the warhead, and exiting the
The dummy warhead then tumbled out of its
trajectory. There are many other instances including an
individual silo in Russia where the controls indicated to
the operator for a harrowing 15 seconds that the launch
sequence was initiated and the missile was about to launch.
A massive UFO hovered outside of the silo control facility.
The top officials were aware of this event. Why did these
kinds of activity occur? One assessment is that we were
being shown a superior capability. For what purpose?
are some possible reasons:
Indicating to our military command that we do not have the
control over these assets that would have to be in place in
order to utilize them.
Allowing that we may not know whether our equipment is
malfunctioning or that the source is external.
Allowing that in a real scenario, we will not have certainty
that interference wouldn’t occur again.
Uncertainty seems to play an important role. With thousands
of nuclear weapons ready to go at any time and with the
predictions of the outcome uncertainty has no place. No
permanent damage was incurred by these activities and our
national security was minimally compromised.
The people at
the top were well aware of these events.
Nuclear Military Exercises
(US and joint)
This is another category that is worth filling in with some
research. If pressure was being applied using these other
areas for demonstration, likely nuclear exercises would have
had them as well.
(research, reactor, weapons test, weapons lost, vessels
There was one purported incident in Canada where a small
nuclear-tipped cruise missile was fired from a US military
aircraft at a UFO, missing it, of course. Although that may
not be considered an accident, it is not stated whether the
missile was recovered after the incident.
There were many occasions when bombs were lost, nuclear
submarines loaded with missiles sank, and accidents occurred
at nuclear fuel processing plants and nuclear power plants.
A limited search for activity at Three Mile Island in
Pennsylvania turned up dry. There may have been some related
activity after the event. It will take more work.
Chernobyl was a different case. UFO Activity occurred prior
to and after the accident there.
Readings before and after a
sphere descended over the facility just after the accident
indicated that the level in that area had been reduced by
over 2/3, according to Paul Stonehill in “The Soviet UFO
Mining Raw Uranium
– what better place to make a statement than the mines.
There is documented activity over uranium mines in Africa.
It is likely that data will support mine-related sightings
And here’s a fascinating event that occurred in
The summer of 1971, I was working the night shift for Conoco
Oil Co. at an open pit uranium mine west of Karnes City, Tx.
I was one of 6 people operating Caterpillar 657B earth
movers. We were down to about 210 feet deep when this
incident happened. It was about 11:10 PM , just after shift
change we were getting ready to crank our machines, when the
85 acre pit lit up as if it was daylight. The light was so
bright that I had to squint because it hurt my eyes.
remember hearing a high pitched hissing noise and the hair
on my arms stood on end. I was so scared, I fell to the
ground and started praying. I remember trying to look up,
but the light was so bright I couldn't. After about 2
minutes, the light started getting dimmer and I could
finally look up at it. What I saw amazed me.
The object was
round and the bright light was coming from the center of the
bottom of the UFO. Around the perimeter of the craft was
hundreds of penlight size light beams that alternated in all
colors of the spectrum. Now I know they were laser beams.
The UFO was rising up slowly at first and then went straight
up out of sight in about 10 seconds.
I was crying and
shaking and so was everyone else. The other shift workers
thought we were crazy when we told them what had happened.
But we got the last laugh. This is how we proved it actually
happened. There is a vein of uranium ore that runs from
George West Texas to almost Texarkana Texas.
determining where to place a mine, the following steps are
A geologist with a geiger counter flies
over the area and finds the highest radiation reading.
Drilling trucks are sent out and core samples are drilled to
determine the highest concentration of uranium ore. These
core samples are drilled in a grid pattern and every core
sample is given a tracking number and logged in showing the
concentration and amount of uranium present.
pit mine is then laid out according to these core samples.
When this UFO incident happened, we were about 2 feet away
from a layer of hard rock called the "tap rock" that laid
directly on top of the uranium ore. The uranium ore varied
in depth from 6 to 18 inches and had about the same brown
color as low grade coal.
Two days after this incident, the
tap rock was removed to expose the uranium ore. We were
astounded to find that the uranium ore was now a chalky
white substance that had NO radioactivity at all!
a 250 foot diameter circle of this chalky material in the
center of the pit. Outside of the circle, the uranium ore
was still as potent as before the incident. Core samples
don't lie. This chalky material was uranium before this
incident. Many a night I have laid in my bed thinking about
I think the UFO needed the uranium for some
Interpretation of this event is that a demonstration was
made regarding the use of uranium. If UFO needed raw or
processed uranium, certainly given the advanced capabilities
displayed, they could have taken as much as they wanted from
If that were the intent you would see much more
of that kind of activity around these mines and likely we
would be dealing with losses at facilities where processed
material is stored, which is simply not supported by the
sighting data available. In this case however what we have
is a known quality and quantity of raw material that is days
away from being extracted.
Right in front of the workers
this UFO comes down and renders the uranium worthless in an
area large enough to get attention. There are no other
events on subsequent days. Just this one. This surely got
the attention of any engineering personnel working on the
project. It is likely that the information was forwarded to
the AEC or another government agency.
Another event was
probably noted by the government for its specificity in
dealing with nuclear technology.
The pressure was
Weapons Component and Chemical
There were likely events occurring over plants that may have
been involved in materials used in processing weapons fuel.
More work is needed for this category.
Weapons Dismantling Facility
This should provide some recent activity if they are
monitoring our progress.
Power Outage Events
– conflict related? Nuclear related? (Vietnam – many events)
Is it possible that the power outage events of the 1960’s
and 1970’s were responses to political/military actions? The
many articles and books indicate the immense depth of
political turmoil brought on by the Vietnam War.
controversy over the courses of action and the lack of a
clear plan based on sound intelligence and analysis brought
the public in on the political fray. These sentiments were
shared by the public of allied countries as well. From the
controversial Tonkin Gulf Resolution (possible UFO
involvement in this incident) on we were in over our heads.
Documentation from several government sources reveal that
discussions to utilize nuclear weapons came up on several
occasions. Early in 1965, President Johnson had initiated a
massive bombing campaign in Vietnam that continued
throughout the year.
What happened towards November of that
If indeed the Northeastern US power outage of that
year was initiated by UFO, what was the message?
prompted that action?
Was Johnson initiating a nuclear
There were serious nuclear bomber training missions from an
aircraft carrier in the Vietnam region the summer of that
year. A clear picture has not yet emerged and further
historical research is needed to look for the correlative
The other outage events have to be evaluated
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Japanese friends and associates have shed much light on
these events. It doesn’t take long for the importance and
horrific nature to set in when you study them. While it is
common knowledge among some of those who were there at the
time of the bombing that UFO were present weeks and perhaps
months before and after, there is little known evidence to
After the bombing there were efforts to study
the affects by Americans from many different disciplines.
Film and camera crews accompanied them documenting every
aspect of these affects. Included in the photographic
records are probably hundreds of pictures and film footage
of the UFO present on a daily basis.
While a few pictures
are posted on the Internet that appear to include UFO, a
more robust photographic record will be needed to set the
record straight. Additionally, there are probably some
written accounts of the UFO surveillance.
There can be no
doubt that there was much outward interest and concern
displayed during this unique and horrific time in human
Naval Nuclear Launch Submarines
Deployment of submarines is unique due to the ability to
close in to specific locations. Many of these sightings
involve UFO submerging in and exiting the oceans.
Treaties and Their Role
Is it possible that related UFO activity had a small
influence on treaties? It is hard to ignore the distinct
possibility that UFO have pressured our governments
Today researchers are in a unique position. A plethora of nuclear
historical information is available from many sources.
Thanks to the hard work of many
individuals, large numbers of sightings at sensitive installations
have been documented and put into databases for study. The time is
right to put new efforts into understanding the historical
significance of these military UFO sightings.
If indeed, these events are as
relational as it now seems, we may begin to understand their role.
Received New EMail
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:26 PM
Subject: Contatto dal dominio www.bibliotecapleyades.net
I am the author of the "Nuclear
Historical Correlative Research" article on the NICAP
A long time ago I discovered that
our policy and developments were very closely tracked by some
"others" and at specific critical times during that history we
were and continue to be warned. I learned of the ancient
presence and the existence of a record with regard to this
The first observations were
pictorial in nature -
old frescos and paintings, petroglyphs
and other ancient crude recordings. I knew early on that the
church had knowledge of this history and while blatantly
displaying it throughout the world, they were actively denying
to the masses that such matters had merit.
I have been to
the Vatican. I know. I decided
that in order to understand the nature of current activity
relative to our nuclear ambitions I needed to have a contextual
reference - a good understanding of the past. I read many books
on this matter, but eventually focused on
Sitchin. I was dismissive
about his interpretation of the apocalyptic nature of
Nibiru's encounter with Earth.
It really seemed like he was
choosing interpretation to fit his hypotheses - something to be
avoided if you want to be taken seriously. I am still reticent
to some degree on this. But, I also know the incredible merits
and accuracy of the rest of that recorded history.
So it becomes difficult to discount.
The arguments presented on this very
informative website have really brought this historical account
into focus. I am not sure at this point how this affects the
context I seek regarding what I have studied about the events
taking place since WW2. I have read a small portion of what you
offer on your website.
It was selective reading to address
specific points I was struggling with. While I think I have a
good understanding of the events of our history now, I still
lack a contextual relationship to our nuclear era
interference. I would appreciate any direction to specific
reading or even better, your insight on this concern.
I am looking for the reason that his
activity is important regarding our decisions between now and
the supposed catastrophic events of Nibiru-Earth interaction.