by Michael Edwards
April 17, 2011
"If we could experiment with
the atmosphere and literally play 'God,' it's very
tempting to a scientist."
On a secluded estate in England, a small
the elite UK 'think'-tank,
The Royal Society, are openly
discussing control over the planet's weather.
The Orwellian nature of the discussion
is stunning, as this select group seemingly wrings their hands over
how to delegate the proper authority to research such godlike power.
They begin by asking a rhetorical
question, "Who decides?"
In a candid AP story, the entire agenda is laid bare as we are
treated to a session that is "generally off the record."
This is the
grand rollout to be sure: from research to implementation, they
announce much of what is already provably in the works, as well as
the road toward a future of unthinkable control by an inner circle
of ideologues with the task to "save the planet."
History is full of these great "experts" who have taken on the
burden of saving the rest of us. Elites throughout the ages have
insisted that the common man or woman is simply not up to the
task... if left to our own devices, we might just destroy the place.
So, let's first recap how these elite
thinkers have done so far based on the key indicators of human
The "peace process" is
apparently a long one. Since the War To End All Wars,
there has been a steady string of significant wars,
protracted conflicts, or "kinetic actions."
The central planners have failed
fantastically when it comes to peace, and there is no sign
of this trend reversing, as it openly has been announced
that a Nobel Peace Prize can be given to the leader of the
free world who has extended and declared wars that are
unconstitutional and morally reprehensible.
Rather, events are demonstrably
leading straight to World War III. It seems like we would be
better off without the humanitarian aid offered by such
The Map of Freedom shows most of
the global population living under some form of
authoritarian control, especially when North America is
Just about all of the rest lives
under Democracy, which is nothing more than the soft version
where two wolves and a sheep meet to decide what is for
This is the
globalist model, which
prefers centralized control and a curtailing of individual
freedom by mafia or mob rule, resulting in the sucking of
all wealth and power toward a top ruling class.
As Louis Brandeis, former
Supreme Court Justice said,
Countries with a true free
market of ideas and commerce are few and far between.
The model of centralized elite
banking management has been an abject failure.
All central banks in history
that have used fiat money - most of which financed both
sides of wars - have failed in that they have bankrupted
their nations and only have enriched those in control. The
current exposure of
the U.S. Federal Reserve is
finally reaching a crescendo, but our managers are already a
step ahead discussing the endgame of a one-world currency to
solve the inadequacies of the past.
I think we have had enough
examples of their central planning skills.
Between the EPA, FDA, and USDA -
just to cite U.S. agencies - our elite researchers,
scientists, and policy makers have been responsible for
millions of deaths, conservatively. And it is only getting
worse, as this global health tyranny aims to
criminalize the food and supplements
that are actually proven to extend our lives.
The key poisons they enable
GMO's; all proven to reduce
cognition, bodily health, and life expectancy.
Fukushima is only the
latest in a long history of corporate/government
mismanagement with global consequences.
Experts claiming to show the
benefits and safety of their advice continuously bombard us.
Yet, our planet has now endured multiple nuclear meltdowns,
oil spills, fracking-induced earthquakes, and global fallout
wars using depleted uranium
- all of which have contaminated Earth and poisoned future
generations beyond imagining.
The only success these elites
can document is the mass killing by dictators like,
...who eliminated a conservative
total of over 100 million people, thus reducing CO2.
Well done if you are a nihilist.
With such a track record of desolation for all but the top
directors, we had best pay attention to their own words
about what direction they have in store for us next.
Most alarming about this semi-clandestine meeting is that
the very premise upon which they base this need for global
Global Warming - has been
thoroughly debunked by any climatologist not beholden
to a government sponsored think tank or agency.
Their famously cited Plan B for
inevitable climate change is nothing more than a wish list
for those who wish to de-industrialize productive nations
and consolidate control through wealth redistribution. Not a
good way to start saving people.
With lies as the basis for what is to follow, we continue
along our Orwellian path set forth by "scientists and
scholars" toward a comprehensive new vision for the future
which was framed by this elite roundtable normally hidden
from public view, but brought to us by the Associated
Propaganda news agency.
Provoking and parrying each other over questions never
before raised in human history, the conferees were sensitive
to how the outside world might react.
Well, we can give points for
honesty here, but are we really to believe that this
"experimentation" has not already begun?
Their own words and observable
facts prove otherwise. The top contender for geoengineering
on a planetary scale, according to the panel, is
"stratospheric aerosol particles." In what sounds a whole
lot like tin-foil hat conspiracy
"particles would be sun-reflecting sulfates spewed into the
lower stratosphere from aircraft, balloons or other
The current evidence for such
activity has already been exhaustively documented by
researchers and popularized by films such as
What In The World Are They Spraying?
The panel actually calls this technique Sun Radiation
The problem with management is
that managers are then necessary, and the ones that have
been appointed should not be to our liking.
The think tank warns that a
"coalition of scientifically capable nations" should set
world direction - led of course by the U.S. and Britain, two
of the most egregious abusers of the planet - "perhaps
inviting China, India, Brazil and others... "
But when in doubt just invoke
the U.N to convince the masses that,
categorically oppose intentional fiddling with
Earth's atmosphere, or at least insist that such
important decisions rest in the hands of the U.N.,
since every nation on Earth has a stake in the skies
world police force and repository of incremental global
"One of the challenges
is identifying intentions, one of which could be
offensive military use."
specialist Arunabha Ghosh referring to weather
If the weather can truly be
controlled, then one can surmise that we are entering a
future of weather wars. And, yet, this already has been
addressed in key white papers such as
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning
The Weather By 2025.
Perhaps the real concern is
similar to that of all WMDs - to be sure that only the
ruling elite can use them, while anyone who opposes or
retaliates is marked with the cattle brand of terrorist.
"There's the 'slippery
slope' view that as soon as you start to do this
research, you say it's OK to think about things you
shouldn't be thinking about."
co-director of Oxford University's geoengineering
The philosophy of "thinking the
unthinkable" always has been trumpeted as a necessary
contingency plan to protect the masses from lone nuts and
rogue governments when, in reality, it is the justification
for what already has been engineered by
psychopaths and sociopaths in
positions of power within dominant governments
and by their think-tank minions.
It is their hatred for the
masses and subsequent policies that lead to what normal
people call unthinkable scenarios.
"I'm queasy about some
billionaire with a messiah complex having a major
role in geoengineering research,"
It takes a lot more than a few
billion dollars to orchestrate weather control, just as
flight-school flunkies with box cutters, or a white
supremacist in Oklahoma with a store-bought truck bomb
cannot orchestrate large-scale terrorism.
For a real messiah complex
with money to back it, one needs a government sponsor. This
is misdirection right from the playbook... and that should
make us queasy.
"All discussions lead to the
central theme of how to oversee research."
There it is:
This control is hidden by our overseers
in their "worry" that this new capability will lead to a
Geoengineering Industrial Complex. It is a pathetic echo of
famous speech warning of a Military Industrial Complex.
This is not a worry at all, as we are
getting the message straight from The Four Horsemen's mouth.
These days such worries are not issued
as a dire broadcast of the threat to individual liberty; they are
sibilant whispers to a mainstream media peddling the message that
only the eradication of individual liberty can save us all.