Two ancient gold masks found at Monte Alban near Oxaca were taken from an ancient tomb by Dr. Alphonso Caso recently. Monte Alban is not far from the pyramid Xochicalca.


The symbols on these two masks refer to the submersion and disappearance of Mu.


I give herewith the dissection and deciphering on the smaller one above (see Plate X).

This tells us the head symbolizes Mu, that her eyes are closed in sleep, she no longer sees, that breathing has ceased because the forces prevent her from breathing through her nose, and the letter M covers her mouth.

There is not sufficient space to give the deciphering of the lower one but it says the same thing in more flowery language.

From the fact that the great pyramid is near by and is, as I have shown previously, a commemorative monument to Mu, and ancient temples being near by also, it seems to me to warrant the belief that these masks were worn by the priests during commemorative ceremonies for Mu either at one of the temples or the pyramid.


These masks are not so very old, probably contemporary with the earlier life of the pyramid, which would be some time after Mu went down, neither are they modern for they long antedate the Aztecs.



Traditions exist saying that some of the Malay Islands were peopled from the Motherland by a branch of the Quiche Mayas.


These colonists, after establishing themselves on these Malay Islands, for a cause untold left their Malay home en masse and migrated to some islands farther north where a new settlement was made. These colonists were the forefathers of the Japanese of today. On inquiry among the Japanese themselves I find these traditions accepted by them.


Their own traditions are a little different but agree on all material points.

When the Japanese arrived in Japan they were a highly civilized people, enjoying the culture they had retained from the Earth's First Great Civilization.


This they retained down to within the memory of living man.


Then they commenced to adopt the new civilization. Today they are modern in all respects and of high rank and standing among the most advanced people on earth, and all this change has been made by themselves during the past 50 or 60 years. If we could go back 100 years and look in on Japan we should see a reflection of Mu 15,000 years ago.


The Japanese flag today has been brought down by them from the Motherland. It is a Sun, the emblem of Mu, the Empire of the Sun. Beyond their flag, the Japanese have among themselves many of the ancient religious conceptions and symbols of the Motherland. Various customs also connect them with the First Civilization.

It is quite a popular belief, even among educated people, that the Japanese are Mongols - they are not. They are as distinct from a Mongol as a white man is from a black. They have descended from the Quiche Mayas of the Motherland, one of the white tribes.


The Japanese language today embodies fully 40 per cent of Quiche-Maya words.



Ceylon is a small island lying close to Cape Comerin, the southern point of the Hindu Peninsula. It is a very beautiful island and has been called "the pearl on the brow of India."

The present Cingalese are newcomers to the land. Their records show that they built their first capital city at Anarajapura, 250 to 200 B. C. I could find no definite records saying from where they came to Ceylon except that they came by boats. Their language is the Italian of the Orient, soft and musical, the bulk of their words commence and end with a vowel. They have more words of the Mother Tongue in their language than any other language I have learnt anything about.


The present Cingalese are undoubtedly from white stock. They are not Aryans; lying between them and the Hindu Aryans is a black race occupying the southern parts of India and called Tamils. I have failed to find their language or anything like it spoken anywhere in the Orient, the Malays or South Sea Islands. Their language was fully developed and they were highly civilized when they came to Ceylon only a couple of thousand years ago.

It is a unique position, the land is exceedingly productive. If it was unoccupied when the Cingalese came, why did not the Tamils who were only across a narrow strait come in and occupy it?


That they are a branch of Naga Mayas I do not doubt for a moment because all the names of their towns, rivers, etc., are pure Naga-Maya words.

As previously stated they first built their capital city, Anarajapura, in the northern part of the Island. Soon trouble developed for them in this spot for hordes of Tamils from the southern parts of India descended upon them, sacked their city and carried off all the fairest of their women. These raids became so frequent that life became unbearable, so they moved farther inland and built another city.


They did not remain long in peace here for the Tamils found them again, sacked the city and once more carried off their young women. Then the Cingalese made another move and went up into the heart of the mountains. Here the Tamils could not reach them. They built a new city and called it Candee. Here they remained in full possession of the mountainous part of the island until Ceylon was occupied by the English.

The Cingalese have always been strict Buddhists, faithfully adhering to the original teachings, allowing no schisms to creep in. Candee, or Kandy as it is now called, is the center of the Buddhist religion today.


They have a plain but unique temple at Kandy.



The ancient history of East Africa is a sealed book, the cover has never been opened.


If, however, all that is told by hunters and explorers be true here is an exceedingly rich field for the archaeologist. In India I found references to companies of Naga Mayas going to East Africa - some on the shores of the Red Sea, others farther south - but absolutely no details on which one could work.


When one looks back over the conditions at the time the Children of Mu were stretching themselves all over the world, it becomes inconceivable that, when they struck the African Coast from India, they should not have worked south as well as north.

Modern travelers tell something about what they have run across.


The following is an example:

"Near Kilwa on the East Coast of Africa, about 400 miles south of Zanzibar,1... is a cliff which has been recently formed by the waves. On the top of this cliff are Persian tombs known to be 700 years old by the dates still legible upon them.

"Beneath these tombs is a layer of debris representing a city. Farther down the cliff is a second layer representing an older city, and farther down still are the remains of another city, older still, of vast and unknown antiquity. Beneath the bottom city were recently found some specimens of glazed earthenware such as are usually met with on that coast today."

1 According to my map, Kilwa is just 200 miles south of Zanzibar, not 400. This difference lies between the map and the traveler. They have got to fight that out between themselves.



This description is one of three which I have come across, but not one mentions anything about the character of the fillings between the cities or, in fact, anything about the geological aspect.


The character of the fillings between buried cities is the most important point of all in arriving at a deduction as to the age of the cities and the cause of their destruction. I have found records of the Phoenicians trading along the East Coast of Africa. This shows that East Africa had a population. It is an exceedingly strange phenomenon that three ancient cities should so often be found lying one over the other in such widely separated parts of the earth.


This leads to the following question: were each of these three civilizations contemporary with each other - America, Asia and Africa? If so, being so widely separated from one another, did the earth in these past ages undergo three great convulsions that each time virtually destroyed the greater part of mankind?

It must be fully understood that all I have said about East Africa is based on travelers' tales and I am not responsible for their veracity.


I have given them for what they are worth.



Authorities are not all in accord as to the origin of the New Zealand aborigines - the Maoris.


My personal conclusions are that New Zealand was one of Mu's small distant colonies, a separate and independent line. New Zealand lay about a thousand miles south of the southwest corner of the Motherland, a distance not insurmountable when we recollect that the ships of the Motherland,

"passed from the Eastern to the Western Oceans and from the Southern to the Northern Seas."

In all probability the settlers in this distant New Zealand would have been, comparatively speaking, few in numbers but of the best and most enterprising type.


Being few in numbers they would naturally devote themselves to the tilling of the soil rather than to the arts and sciences and manufacture. They would naturally, like colonists of today, draw their manufactured supplies from the Mother Country. When the Motherland was destroyed and submerged, the New Zealanders, not being skilled artisans but tillers of the soil, were unable to manufacture such supplies as they had been obtaining from the Mother Country, so they were compelled to fall back on primitive methods.


New Zealand, being a large area of land with great natural resources, could offer these colonists within their settlement the wherewithal to get along, so that this colony of Maoris did not fall quite as low as did many of the poor remnants left upon the jagged rocks of the Pacific Ocean.

The Maoris belong to the Polynesian white race.


O'Brien tells us that the classic language of Polynesia today is the Maori tongue. He advances the theory that the Maoris came to New Zealand from the Polynesian Islands, whither they had come from Asia. I feel that he is wrong in both cases. As before stated, there are many evidences showing that the Maoris went to New Zealand before the submersion of Mu.


I base these deductions on the following:

  • First, the Maoris have traditions about the dim past that are not found on any of the Pacific Islands

  • Second, they have very prominent symbols which originated in Mu and are not found among any of the Polynesian Islands

The natural inference from these facts is: the Maoris came direct from the Motherland to New Zealand.

From the log book of Captain Cook, recounting his first voyage around the world A. D. 1770, I take the following:

"They [the Maoris] were not always in New Zealand. Ages ago they came to New Zealand from Heawice."

I have been unable to trace Heawice or to connect it with any of the South Sea Islands or the Malays. Heawice may, therefore, have been the name of that part of the Motherland from whence they came.


Personally, I have been unable to find out anything from them beyond what Captain Cook relates - they came from Heawice.

"They acknowledge one Supreme Being and several subordinate deities."

This might simply have been symbols of the various attributes of the Deity which Captain Cook would not have understood.

"They are eaters of human flesh, the flesh of their enemies when killed in battle."

The Maoris of New Zealand, the descendants of the white race of the Motherland, have weathered the storm magnificently.


They have passed through the fires of adversity, trials and tribulations, and have come out of them worthy of the grand old race from which they sprung. With the disappearance of their Motherland from whence came their necessary supplies, everything was lost to them except their bare homes and land. This great loss was no fault of theirs, only their misfortune.


Notwithstanding this staggering blow, thousands upon thousands of years have been insufficient entirely to eliminate all of their original civilization. Their brains and the better parts of their nature have remained for, with the new civilization taught them by the English and the opportunity given them, the Maoris have made unprecedented strides in learning and in regaining their place among the most enlightened and civilized people on earth.

Within the memory of living man the Maoris were in a savage state.


Today, the children of these savages are many of them highly educated, filling positions in the professions and in the government of New Zealand. England is proud to reckon the Maoris among her family of children, for under her tuition their advancement has made gigantic strides. The springing forth of the Maori into the bright light of the New Civilization has not been a step in evolution or even a development.


His development took place in the Motherland eons of time ago. His great leaps and bounds in enlightenment and learning are simply due to the freeing of his brains from thousands upon thousands of years of imprisonment. It has been an awakening from a long, long sleep.

The Maori is a living example of the falsity of the modern scientific theories that civilizations come up from savagery, taking many generations and hundreds of thousands of years to accomplish it. Savagery left alone never advances but gradually falls lower and lower. It is only when civilization is brought in contact with savagery that change takes place.


A savage can only rise above his savagery when he is taught to do so by civilization. When the savage is left alone, civilization does not meet him. Then he constantly falls lower and lower.

The most prominent marks connecting the Maori with the Motherland are:

  • language

  • traditions

  • sacred symbols

  • religion

  • totem pillars

The Maori traditions are many "and very interesting. Among them is the story of "Cain and Abel."

Return to Contents