The recorded history such as has been found, referring to what historians have called "the old Oriental Empires" and recorded by our scientists, consists of the reading of a few tablets and inscriptions written in cuneiform and then matching up their translations with the Biblical Legends. The furthest any of these go back is less than 5000 years ago.
The commencement of Babylonia dates back 18,000 years or more when a settlement on the river Euphrates was made by a company of Naga-Mayas from India. In after times they met the end of the Eastern Line from Mu.
The people they
met were Semitics.
The first Akkadians were a company of Naga-Mayas from India who came through the Persian Gulf and made their first settlement at the mouth of the Euphrates River. They called the place Akkad.
Akkad is a Naga-Maya word meaning "soft and marshy ground" which today is the character of the ground on the Euphrates Delta. When the settlement was formed the people adopted the name they had given to their settlement and thus became known as the Akkadians. Temple records in India speak of this settlement but give no date.
Contemporary records have dates of about 18,000 years ago, so I think it permissible to assume that the Akkad settlement was made about 18,000 years ago.
After the Akkad settlement was firmly
established, the Akkadians worked inland up the Euphrates River and
became known as:
Sumer is another Naga-Maya word meaning "flat lands or plains."
From this they took or were given the name Sumerians,
plainsmen or men of the plains. It is thus seen that the Sumerians
and Akkadians were one and the same people; the difference being
that one set lived inland, countrymen, and the other set lived on
the seashore, shoremen. Historians, however, have written as if the
Akkadians and Sumerians were two different peoples, which is
Babylon was also called "Ka Ra" which is Naga-Maya meaning "the city of the Sun."
Valmiki also states,
The Akkadians and Sumerians, the real and ancient Babylonians, were far in advance of a Semitic people living to the north of them, as regards both civilization and learning.
Surrounding the settlement at Akkad, and at various places along the river, there were large areas of tall reeds, the homes of vicious animals. To protect themselves against these marauding beasts the settlers built stockades around their homes and villages. These stockades they called Chaldi. All of their colleges and temples of learning were within an enclosure. This enclosure was also called Chaldi.
Later, Chaldi was the name given to the learned class and their colleges,
These colleges were open to all people who wished to learn, regardless of their nationality.
The students were taught the ancient Naga-Maya language, the sacred mysteries, arts and sciences. Many of the Israelites, when they were in captivity in Babylonia later on, availed themselves of this privilege and some reached the highest degree, that of master and adept.
Daniel was one of them.
Daniel understood it and read it to the King.
At the court of Nebuchadnezzar when he was King of the Babylonian
Empire, the Chaldi were classed with the astrologers and the
After a time the Sumerians and Akkadians were attacked and conquered by a Semitic people coming down from the North.
I can find no records giving the name of these people before they settled in Babylonia. Historians say they were the Chaldeans, but the name of Chaldeans was adopted by them after their settlement in Babylonia. These Semitics finding the civilization of the Akkadians and Sumerians so far in advance of their own, instead of putting them to the sword or enslaving them, assimilated them, that is, they were placed on an equality with their conquerors and intermarried.
Their scientists were given the greatest honors. So
successfully did this work that in the absorption the Akkadians and
Sumerians were never known again as a separate people. They
disappeared from history.
Can anything more erroneous and
misleading than the foregoing be penned? The Chaldeans were not a
nation or a people, but a sect, men of great learning and advanced
Cannes or Hoa-ana is Naga-Maya: na - water, a - thy, and na - house.
plain English it reads, "he who lives in a boat."
Yet a point still remains: Berosus says that civilization was
brought to Babylonia by those who came in their boats, thus
confirming the other writings which say that the civilization of
Sumeria and Akkadia was far in advance of the civilization of the
Semitics who conquered the country.
It relates the first meeting between the Sumerians and the Semitics in an amusing manner:
I showed my translation to my Greek friend and asked him if I had translated it correctly.
He laughed, saying,
Again I will quote history:
This is absurd; Hindu records and temple records at that, which are always the most accurate, speak of the Babylonian colony over 15,000 years ago, and Brunsen shows that 14,000 years ago it was in existence.
is older than Egypt, and Egypt is 16,000 years old. It may be,
however, that the historian that gives 7000 B.C. came across some
record that referred to the date when the Semitics conquered the Akkadians and Sumerians and absorbed them.
The Naga-Maya tongue remained the language of science down to about
the 6th or yth Century B.C. When the Country was finally settled the
Semitics adopted the name Chaldi or Chaldeans taken from the many
prominent institutions of science and learning; so, to be exact,
there never was a people or nation called Chaldeans, for Chaldi or
the Chaldeans were a sect only.
The foregoing Babylonian and Akkadian words are the decipherings of Dr. Hinks, Sir Henry Rawlinson, Dr. Appert, M. Grivel and Professor Sayce of the tablets that composed King Asurbanipal's library.
M. Lenormant has published an elementary grammar and vocabulary from the findings of the foregoing authorities. Out of this vocabulary the foregoing Babylonian and Akkadian words are taken. In a central column against each of these words I have put the Hindu Naga-Maya corresponding words.
This clearly proves my findings regarding the
use of the Naga-Maya tongue in Babylonia.
History is not quite as bashful as Dame Science for although Dame Science will never permit herself to be interviewed, always leaving interviews in the hands of her office boys, Dame History is totally different.
She boldly parades before
the eyes of everyone and may be met with and interviewed in all good
History is partially right and partially wrong.
The Assyrians were also a Semitic race, originating from the Caucasian or Zahian Colony.
They take their distinctive name Assyrians from the land which they occupied. Assyria lay between the Upper Tigris River and the Zagros Mountains. During the early period of Assyrian history they were a vassal state of Babylonia. The Assyrian warlike spirit first enabled them to cast off the yoke of Babylonia and to become independent. Then they effected conquests among their neighbors.
Eventually they gained the ascendancy over Babylonia.
splendid, proud Assyria was conqueror but a short time, for she fell
before the assaults of the Medes in the year 625 B. C.
The remnants of the Uighurs which had been marooned in the mountains that were raised along the southwestern parts of the Uighur Empire, come prominently forward upon the historical stage about 8000 or 10,000 years after the destruction of the Uighur Empire.
During this eon of time the several little communities grew and waxed strong; when the bleak valleys of the mountains could no longer sustain their growing numbers, they had to find new homes. Then a general exodus took place from the mountains to lower lands where the conditions were favorable to growth and development.
This exodus took place from about 2000 B. C. down to
about 1500 B. C.
The commencement of their migration
was about 2000 B.C. to 1800 B.C. The migration ended about 1500 B.C.
could it be otherwise, for originally they were the same?
During this time the Persians were on one big jamboree of conquest with a view of subduing the whole world. They had absorbed the western and southwestern parts of Asia, carried their conquests into Egypt and into a small portion of Europe, when their triumphant march was stopped by the Greeks under Alexander the Great.
This was the second
time in the history of nations that the Greeks stopped empires which
attempted to enslave the world. The first was the overthrow of
Atlantis 9500 B. C., and the second the overthrow of the Persian
aspirations 331 B. c. The Persian flag today carries the emblem of a
colonial empire - an emerging Sun on the horizon with rays - thus
connecting themselves with the Uighurs and Mu, the Motherland.
In the Akkadians and
Sumerians we find an end of one of the western lines of colonization
from Mu, in the Medes and Persians we find an end of another western
line, and in the Semitics we find one of the ends of the main
eastern line of colonization. Nowhere else on earth did so many ends
meet. In Egypt there were only two and in western Europe two.
I am simply endeavoring to show that the
various peoples who from time to time have controlled Babylonia, all
originally came from Mu and were, in fact, Mu's children.