It was India who stood foremost for thousands of years, holding together and carrying on the earth's first great civilization after the destruction of the Motherland. Other nations held the civilization for a time but all except India soon began to fall back and many disappeared. It was India that stood foremost in religion, philosophy, astronomy, sciences, music, art and medicine from the time of the destruction of the Motherland down to about 500 B.C.
other nation could stand as hdr rival or compete with her in all
branches of knowledge. The world generally knows nothing of this.
Historians have utterly failed to show and to credit India with a
civilization of ancient date, yet the Akkadians, Sumerians,
Babylonians and Upper Egyptians were her offspring.
The physical proofs are there.
How does this compare
with the nonsensical histories of India, that say India's
civilization only dates back 4000 or 5000 years?
SUBMERGED LANDS, WEST COAST OF INDIA
In the Indian Ocean, adjoining the West Coast of India, there exists a large area of submerged lands with structures showing thereon.
Like the remains of the South Sea Islands, these structures are prehistoric. These submerged lands commence at about 21 degrees north latitude, or just below the mouth of the river Indus, and extend south to about the equator. These submerged lands are apparently of an elongated oval shape.
The Lacadive and Maldive groups of low-lying islands are within the boundaries of this oval. Although I have several times passed quite close to them, I have never been on any of them, so cannot say whether they are parts of the sunken land still above water, or whether they are the subsequent work of coral insects. There is a long stretch of very shallow water both north and south of these islands with various channels of deeper water crossing them, through which ships have to pass going to or from India.
This geological phenomenon has never been noted by any geologist or archaeologist as far as I can ascertain or by any historian.
On days when conditions are favorable - that is, water and sky - imposing remains of ancient structures are clearly to be seen on the shallow water within the oval mentioned. These submerged lands are well known to the fishermen along the coast; as a matter of fact, it was through them that I became aware of this submersion. Hindu scientists also know of them; no one, however, can account for structures being at the bottom of the ocean as the submergence is not spoken of in Hindu history no matter how far one goes back.
This is not at all to be
wondered at as Hindu history does not go further back than 3000 B.C.
In India, at various spots, there are hundreds and maybe thousands
of old tablets dating from some 15,000 to 35,000 years ago. The
possibility is that if these old tablets were brought out and
deciphered, an account of this submersion might be forthcoming.
To my mind,
there is not the slightest doubt what caused this submergence and
that the present island of Ceylon was raised through it.
India was not always called India. As a matter of fact, India is a modern name for the peninsula; it has only been called India for about 2300 to 2400 years. What the ancient name of the Hindu peninsula was, or whether there was a name embodying the whole of the peninsula, I do not know.
In all the ancient records which I have read, the Naga Empire, the Maharalta Kingdom and Dravida are only mentioned.
The name India came out of the Greek.
When the Greeks under Alexander the Great invaded India 325 B. C.,
they found in the northwestern parts a large river which the natives
called Sindhu. The Greeks transformed the name, first to Indu,
afterwards to Hindu. Finally the river became known as the Indus and
the people as Hindus and Indians. This section of India is called
1 Naacal writings in a Tibetian monastery state that the Mayas
settled m India over 70,000 years ago and were of a swarthy
complexion with dark piercing eyes.
When, thousands of years afterwards, India was split up into a number of little kingdoms, the Tamils again gained their independence and formed monarchies.
I never think of the Ramayana without feeling that I am about to shake hands with an ancient friend.
Valmiki, the Hindu Herodotus, appeals to me more than any other Hindu writer, possibly because it has been my fortunate lot to see so many of the ancient writings from which his were taken. I can mentally bridge the gulf of time between us and picture him sitting at the feet of the old master, Narana, and like myself later from another great master, deriving pearls of wisdom from the ancient teachings.
The Ramayana was written from temple records and temple histories, dictated from the originals by Narana to Valmiki. When Valmiki turned the tale of Rama and Sita into verse he used poetic license. Thoroughly to understand it and to appreciate it, it should also be read in the prose.
To make things perfectly clear, I quote:
From the history given him by Narana, Valmiki wrote the verses forming the life of Rama and Sita, one of the greatest epics ever penned by man.
Valmiki would make it appear in his verse that Rama
was the son of the celestial orb, but in his prose writings he
carefully shows that "Son of the Sun" does not mean a son of the
celestial orb but a son of the Motherland, The Empire of the Sun, a
colonial designation to which he was entitled being of the royal
family of the Motherland.
I quote from two translations, the historical parts from Hippolyte Fauche, and Rama and Sita from Romesh Dutt's.
has indulged in a great deal of symbolical writings in the poem
which are fully explained in other Hindu texts.
3 Romesh Dutt evidently ran up against the same obstacle in
translation of this poem as everyone else has who has tried. The
passage "yoked to asses" involves in the original a word hard to
translate, because apparently we have no corresponding word in our
language. Romesh Dutt used the word "asses" but calls attention to
it in the type. The word used in the original evidently means a
majestic power, or force. Notwithstanding Romesh Dutt's masterly and
wonderful translation, there is a something insinuative in the
original that apparently cannot be translated into another language.
By translation the poem loses some of its beauty. Romesh Dutt's
translation is, however, the best ever written.
Hindu Manuscript, Dated 500 B.C.:
Without question both of these manuscripts were taken from the same
temple records at Ayhodia, as was the Rama and Sita poem, referring
back 20,000 years ago.
The power is taken from the atmosphere in a very simple inexpensive manner. The engine is somewhat like our present-day turbine in that it works from one chamber into another until finally exhausted. When the engine is once started it never stops until turned off. It will continue on if allowed to do so until the bearings are worn out.
These ships could
keep circling around the earth without ever once coming down until
the machinery wore out. The power is unlimited, or rather limited
only by what metals will stand. I find various flights spoken of
which according to our maps would run from 1000 to 3000 miles.
Dropping bombs from airships is a new sport with us, less than twenty years old; yet here we see that it was done 15,000 to 20,000 years ago.
Rawan was shot down with a circular gun that spit fire and made thunder which is uncommonly like some of our machine guns today. Yet the world is flattering itself today that never before during the history of man has there ever been such a brainy lot of scientists as are with us at the present time. Pure egotism crowned with ignorance.
I feel like the sage of old who said:
There are many Chinese records of about
the same date regarding these ancient flying machines.
Wheeler might have been more explicit and have said the Mayas came to India as Nagas and afterwards became known as Danavas.
The traditions of the Nagas are not so very obscure.
The Nagas formed the first Hindu Empire. Their first king was called Ra Ma.4 At what date the Empire commenced or at what date it ended, only traditions remain and these, as Wheeler says, are obscure.
4 See footnote page 63.
Naga was the name of the cobra de capella in the Motherland and was selected by these people as their
symbol of the Creator. They gave it seven heads to correspond with
the seven commands of the Creation and adopted the name of Nagas for
their distinction among the other people of the Motherland whose
symbol for the Creator was different from their own.
Prince Maya was the son of one of the early kings of the Naga Empire.
This would account for the representation that he was "A partial incarnation of the Sun." The word "incarnation" is the wrong word.
My personal opinion regarding the original Souyra Siddhanta is that
it was written in the Motherland and brought to India by Prince Maya
when he returned from his studies.
The meaning of the
name is: Rig - verse, and Veda - knowledge. Knowledge given in verse.
The Rig Veda is unquestionably written from two sources, namely,
temple histories and legends; therefore, the Rig Veda tells of the
then past and not of the then present, 1500 B.C. Some of it
unquestionably refers back tens of thousands of years as it is found
in the writings of the Motherland.
As an example:
This refers to Creation.
In the Popol Vuh, the Quiche Sacred Book, written in Guatemala, Central America, also taken from the Sacred Writings, it appears as:
In the Nahantl writings of Yucatan it
is given as "He expressed a desire to create."
In the Nahantl it is given:
In the Sacred Writings:
I am definitely sure, although without proof, that the original Rig Veda was composed by a Naacal poet and was stolen by the Aryans who afterwards claimed it as their own production.
At the time the Rig
Veda was written, the Aryans were neither highly educated nor
competent to write such verse. The Naacals were. They were the
adepts of the wisdom and sciences of the Motherland.
The temples, most of them, have some sort of records of the ancient past, some more, some less, and a few none at all, so they say, but this is open to doubt. There are numerous figures and bas-reliefs carved on walls throughout India. Nearly every figure and group of figures is a tableau describing some historical event.
All these are
lines in history.
Here Smith is absolutely correct, for it is "exceedingly remote," being translations from the literature written in the Motherland and brought to India by the Naacals, tens of thousands of years before.
Historians say that the Vedic literature was written by the Aryans. This is impossible. The Aryans were not sufficiently cultivated and advanced to compose such verse at the time the Rig Veda was written. The Aryans did not become known as scholars until a sect known as Brahmins began to form colleges of their own based on the teachings they had received from the Naacals before they drove them out of India.
And what extravagances did these Brahmins introduce into the pure religion taught by the Naacals?
Let us read:
Vamana, one of the Hindu Sages. Vamana has many scornful and bitter words for the Brahmin ritualists and ascetic devotees who set their hopes of salvation upon formal ceremonies.
W. Robertson, "An Historical Disquisition, India," published 1794, page 247, says:
5 The ten cyphers, figures or glyphs did not originate in India.
They originated in the Motherland and were there known as the
"cardinal numbers" and alsc carried an esoteric meaning which
translated was "The Creation of Man by the One God."
Here it is plainly seen that the Brahmins were responsible for dragging India down from her foremost place among nations.
It is here illustrated that when the wisdom and teachings of the Nagas were withdrawn the Brahmins at once commenced a downward fall in the sciences, giving evidence that is incontrovertible that the persecution and driving out of the Naga scientists, the teachers of the Brahmins, was the death knell to India's supremacy in the sciences and her high position among nations.
When the Nagas could
stand the persecution no longer, those who could took their books
and records and went into the mountains on the north, settling in
monasteries on the southern slopes of the Himalayas. Subsequently
they were forced to take another step further north. They then
settled in Tibet on the northern slopes of the Himalayas. Very few
remained in the south.
The foregoing confirms my own research work.
The Brahmin priesthood first
learnt what they could and then persecuted the Nagas to extinction.
This needs no further comment on my part having heretofore shown
what the Brahminitical Priesthood were. It, however, strongly
confirmed Robertson and my own researches.
This is without question
another Naacal work. The work refers to times thousands upon
thousands of years before the Brahmins developed in India. Competent
Hindu sages tell me that this book refers to times more than 20,000
years ago. This I have corroborated by tablets found in temples. The
Brahmins may have stolen it and published it as their own.
Kaurarus and Pandavas fought for the capital city of Hastinapur.
The following is another headline which I have found condensing the details of the Bharata war:
The Maha Bharata having been written 1000 B. C. and the Bharata war having occurred 1400-1500 B.C. shows the book to have been written 500 years after the event, therefore upon legendary records.
The Maha Bharata like the Ramayana has not remained in its original
form. Alterations have been made and many additions to the original
writings. It would seem that, although the great theme of the Maha
Bharata was the Bharata war, it includes other events as well.
Maya, the great architect and scientist,
was a Prince of the Nagas, subsequently call Danavas, of the First
Colonial Indian Empire dating back over 20,000 years.
As these date back to very ancient times they are in all probability
two of the additions made to the original. The Nivata-Kavachas being
Danavas, were Nagas; and being Nagas they were Mayas.
I have added this note to carry recorded Indian history back over 10,000 years beyond the date of Hindu authorities. As a matter of fact, written records in a northern monastery carry the civilization of India back more than 50,000 years. This corresponds with what is found written in Yucatan.
India was the pearl on the brow of the
Motherland. This does not entirely agree with many Hindu historians,
so I must disagree with them on the grounds that I have studied the
subject before writing about it.
It takes the Sacred Writings and with evident deliberateness misinterprets and adds to them. Misstatements permeate the whole text. The book reads as if it had been designed to breed distrust, fear and superstition in the people. There is very little symbolism in it. It is, rather, filled up with comparisons, unphilosophical and absolutely one-sided. No point is proven.
Most sentences read like the headline of a chapter, leaving the chapter unwritten. There is no continuity of subjects, which leaves the whole thing indefinite. If the writer was only committing stray thoughts to writing, he admirably succeeded, but to follow the workings of his mind by his writings is absolutely impossible.
was a work written with a view to breeding schisms and sects,
without doubt it is admirable.
There is a fantastic tendency throughout with mythical thoughts ruling the mind and a leaning towards the Cosmic Sciences which he did not understand in the least, as is shown by the following:
In the Sacred Writings it is particularly shown that light is an earthly force, not an element. Flames are superheated elements passing off in the form of gases after an analysis of the material by the earth's heat force. Life is produced by the combination of two forces working on an elementary body.
Heat is a force, water is composed of two elements,
forces do not make or produce elements.
"The Books of the Golden Age" is an Oriental name given to "The Sacred Inspired Writings" of Mu, the Motherland.
Among all ancient people and people
of great antiquity they were also called The Sacred Mysteries. The
reading of these books was known only to masters, high priests, and
some selected priests. Neither the lower members of the priesthood
nor the people could read them.
Sir Edwin Arnold in the opening chapter of his charming epic, The Light of Asia, hit the nail squarely on the head where he says:
Had Sir Edwin been capable of deciphering, translating, and reading The Books of the Golden Age which he refers to as "The Books" he would without question have expressed his feelings in still stronger language.
The Hindu priesthood were not alone and some were even worse, we have only to look at the records of the Egyptians, Phoenicians and Aztecs to see this confirmed. In many cases it is very apparent that the Hindu priesthood's object was to breed mystification, superstition and awe in the hearts of the people and so bring them, body and soul, under priestly control. The priesthood would give a part only of what was written on a tablet, declaring it to be the Sacred Inspired Writings.
I have made an accusation against the priesthood. It is, therefore, only right that I should prove my assertion. To do this I will give a few examples of what is actually written in the Sacred Writings and what the priesthood, subsequent to the driving out of the Naacals, have given out to the people.
My first example will be an extract from the Section on Creation:
Thus showing that man is a special
Extravagant lengths of lives have been doled out by the priesthood for the purpose of accomplishing their own ends; which was, receiving payment from those who wished to prolong their lives beyond the ordinary period assigned to man.
It worked well, fortunes rolled into the priesthood's coffers, and if the man did not live as long as paid for, it was his own fault because he did not follow implicitly the priestly instructions.
This extravagance was handed out to the people thousands of years ago and has been religiously brought down to present time.
The people have been taught that it was their material body that could be made to thus survive if they would follow the instructions of the priesthood and pay a little for it - just a little, only all the worldly wealth they possessed.
The complete translation of this tablet reads:
When Moses translated this sentence he put the right construction on it he translated it as:
When Valmiki, the Hindu Herodotus, wrote his wonderful epic the Ramayana, he made omissions from the original which entirely changed the meaning. I refer to the passage where he says:
Valmiki left out the preceding words "the descendants of."
The old Rishi and I deciphered either the original tablet or an old, old copy of it.
This tablet says:
In other words, it was the Rama Dynasty that lasted 10,000 years and not the reign of the first Rama.
Upon this passage they advanced and taught the theory that Everything was a part of the Creator Himself, which naturally means there is no God when everything is God. This being the case the worship of a piece of wood or stone is not idolatry because the piece of wood or stone is God. And the cannibalistic savage when worshiping his fetish is all right because his fetish is our God!
Can a more horrible conception
A box is the product of the carpenter, but not a part of the carpenter himself. A seed sown in the ground by the gardener, germinates, shoots up and bears flowers and fruit. The flowers and fruit are not a part of the gardener, they are the product of his work. A tree sends forth leaves and flowers, these leaves and flowers are a part of the tree.
So here on earth, all and everything except man are
products of the Creator's work and not parts of the Creator himself.
Man only is the leaf upon the tree.
One of the rankest of the early Brahminitical teachings was:
The passage from the Sacred Inspired Writings from which this invention was worked out reads:
In these teachings they do not show how man
became possessed of a soul - they could not.
Each time they have been
translated since leaving the hands of the Naacals, greater and more
numerous inventions, extravagances, additions, omissions and
misconceptions have been engrafted into the translations by the
cunning, unscrupulous priesthoods.
With a view to enslaving the people, both body and soul, to the aggrandizement of the priesthood, further to gain absolute control over the minds and worldly possessions, the priesthood invented obtuse doctrines and used them in place of the simple, pure and plain teachings of Gautama Buddha.
They turned the Buddhist religion in Northern India
into a metaphysical, mystical, mythical doctrine which not one in a
thousand could understand.
Later to complete their program by adding fear and dread to awe and superstition, they introduced into the Buddhist religion the degrading worship of Siva, the mythical man-devil in connection with a mythical hell. Egypt had taught India a great lesson with its man-devil Set and his mythical hell.
The Hindus were not slow in any way to see the great advantage
a devil and a hell would be to them.
The origin of an immaculate conception and virgin birth is to be found in the Sacred Inspired Writings.
It originates from the 5th Command in Creation,
In a subsequent chapter explaining Creation, cosmic eggs are referred to as "the Virgins of Life."
The sentence reads:
Hoi: closed. Hu: virgin womb. Kal: to open.
Free reading: to pierce or open the virgin womb; and by extension: to pierce or open the virgin womb of Life.
For this reason the ancients
called the waters "The Mother of Life," for up to this period of the
earth's development the womb of Life had been closed. The advent of
Life had opened the virgin womb in the waters.
Our learned scholars tell us that the ancient kings claimed virgin birth because they called themselves "Son of the Sun." These kings claimed nothing of the kind, they were emperors of colonial empires under the suzerainty of Mu, the Empire of the Sun, and "Son of the Sun" was a title bestowed on these kings by Mu, thus showing their allegiance to her.
"Son of the Sun" meant
son or child of the
Empire of the Sun.
The Sacred Inspired Books were written for the purpose of teaching early man religion; therefore, man's first religion was the teachings of the Sacred Books.
The basis of this
religion was Love. Man's Love for the Heavenly Father and His works.
The Divine Love of the Heavenly Father for His son Man.
Love stood at the head of the 12
great virtues, because Love governs the Universe and the Heavenly
Father is The Great Love.
I should answer:
Tell me, what other temple can fill its
There were many symbols for the various
attributes of the Deity, but only two for the full Godhead. The
perfect understanding of these two great symbols is an important
factor in tracing the various lines of colonization from the
Originally the Sun was pictured as a
plain circle. Later the circle was used for other symbolizations
such as The Universe, Infinity, etc.; then, to specialize it as the
monotheistic symbol, additions were made to it. The Nagas added a
dot in the center and the Uighurs, their northern neighbors, a
smaller circle instead of a dot.
To the north of the
Naga region, a conventional form of the Quetzacoatl was used which
they called Khan or King. This form is known as the Dragon. On the
eastern central, and to the north, the venomous feather-covered
serpent, Quetzacoatl, was the symbol. Among the people who settled
in western North America we find many variations in the conventional
forms of Quetzacoatl.
All historians speak of "The Aryan Invasion of India."
This has been misleading to the public, for the
public generally has been left with the idea that the Aryans sent an
army of soldiers into India and conquered the country. This was not
so. The same misconceptions have been taught about the Incas of Peru
who superseded the Aymaras. Instead of the word invasion being used,
the more appropriate word would have been infiltration which would
have given a correct explanation.
They were received kindly by the Nagas and made welcome,
so they sent back word to the mountains for their relatives and
friends to come. They came, not a laggard among them; and they kept
coming for hundreds of years, by families, by scores, and by
hundreds; and as they came, the newcomers settled to the east of the
previous ones until they had completely overrun the land and settled
themselves throughout the whole of the northern parts of India.
E.G. Tillac says:
V.A. Smith entirely disagrees with Tillac and says:
For certain reasons hereafter
given, I believe that Smith is much nearer right than Tillac.
The Medes and
Persians were a continuation of these in the north.
Owing to their
hand-to-mouth existence in the mountains, they were exceedingly
hardy but low in education. In their bitter struggles to sustain
life, all learning and sciences were neglected. Apparently they
retained the art of reading and writing only, so that on their
arrival in India, they were only rough, uncouth, hardy mountaineers.
What became of them? Where did they go?
A great many intermarried with the Aryans so that there was a mixture and produced a type which is very prominent in India today. This mixture is now classed among the Aryans. What became of those who did not marry and were crowded out? I can find neither record nor legend that is acceptable. I will give what appears to be a reasonable deduction.
It must, however, be
thoroughly understood that these are deductions, not assertions.
They may or may not be correct.
Rajputana the Kingdom extended down to Goa. There is a Sanskrit writing saying that the Maharattas were driven thus far south by the Aryans. I think the word "driven" is an error, and the words "crowded out" would better convey the actual meaning. I think as the Aryans crowded in from the Hindu Koosh, the Maharattas gradually went farther south. The Maharattas again come into prominence A.D. 1650 to A.D. 1680 when they broke the power of the Mongul conquerors of India.
time of Savaji, the Mohammedan power declined.
No date can be given of the first Maharatta Kingdom. It was, however, back beyond 10,000 years ago.
Legends seem to indicate that the first Maharatta Kingdom was
contemporary with the adjoining Ra Ma Empire which apparently
succeeded the Naga Empire.
In the Kashmir Valley there is a secluded people known as Nayas who still worship the Deity through the symbol Naga, the seven-headed Serpent.
Are these Nayas of Kashmir a still surviving, pure-blooded
remnant of the ancient Nagas? I have never had the opportunity of
getting their history or legends. These people may be the
descendants of a small company who left India under the persecution
of the Aryans and took refuge in the Kashmir Mountains. It would be
interesting to know their origin.
This is only partially true. It is true that they drove them out of all temples, colleges and educational institutions but not to absolute extinction, for many went north into the Himalayan Mountains and to the mountains beyond in Central Asia, and these formed colleges of their own out beyond the world, so to speak. The descendants of a few, very few, are still in existence.
Among these very few there are those who have
managed to maintain and retain some of the sciences and learning of
the Earth's First Civilization. Those retained have been principally
about the science of man's great Divine Force; the other sciences
have either been neglected or forgotten.
Pundit Dayanand Saraswatti and Swami Vive Kananda in their writings assert that the Nagas came to India from Patala and that Patala means antipodes, directly opposite, on the other side of the earth.
I must take exception to this definition of the word Patala by these learned Hindus. Without doubt the Nagas came from Patala, but Patala does not mean antipodes. The word Patala, is composed of three Naga vocables.
Two are of the Motherland's vocabulary and the third is a Naga modification of the Motherland's.
Both the Nagas and the May as occasionally called the Sun La instead of Ra.
Patala, therefore, means "The Land of the Sun"
which was one of the names given to Mu, the Motherland.
This city still remains but modernized in both structure and name.
It is now called Tatta.