Control of this reality is control of the mind-game through which reality is created. We can either give our minds away to the constant conditioning of our sense of self and the world or we can cease to feed those delusions and manifest our own reality. That is the difference between existing in slavery and living in freedom. Understanding how we are programmed to believe in the consensus 'Matrix' reality is vital to cutting the chains that bind us to the prevailing illusion.
In this chapter I will explore the techniques used to manipulate that sense of reality. It is testament to the power of consciousness that anyone at all has awoken from their manipulated dream, especially in the 'developed' world of mass media and indoctrination.
But they have and the numbers are
exploding across the globe because the influence of Illuminati
programming is no match for the power of consciousness in awareness
of that power.
Wilson Bryan Key rightly says in his book, The Age of Manipulation:
The Matrix consciousness and its Illuminati manifestation know the process of creating reality. Society, therefore, has been structured to maintain the illusion. The subconscious is where the thought patterns. are generated that the conscious mind observes into holographic 'reality'; and the subconscious, with its language of symbolism and metaphor, is the Illuminati's prime target to be conditioned in many subtle and less subtle ways.
One example is the massive increase in the number of speed cameras in Britain. Millions of motorists are being caught because their mind wanders for a moment and they are snapped a few miles an hour over the limit. This brings in enormous amounts of money in fines that the government says is being spent on introducing more cameras. Talk about paying for your own prison.
The subconscious message of this system is "don't relax for a second because Big Brother's eyes are everywhere". When the police letter arrives with a picture of your car and threats for not doing exactly as demanded, the subconscious implant of "do as we say, we are in control of your life" is still further reinforced. The whole process happens without the driver seeing a single human being. They send you a leaflet with a list of questions they think you might ask. The answer to everyone is basically "there's nothing you can do".
One of them asks if it makes any difference that you have a perfect driving record with no previous convictions for car offences of any kind. Is this taken into account?
The answer is:
That is the idea. The Illuminati want to remove as much human involvement as possible so there is no weighing of the circumstances, no taking every case on its merits. This is how it is, end of story. Doing five miles an hour over the speed limit in dense traffic is treated the same as doing the same speed on the same stretch of road at three in the morning when there is no other vehicle in sight.
The letters you receive are worded to imprint fear to illicit the desired response. It suggests you could be fined thousands of pounds if the case goes to court, but they offer you the chance of paying a fixed penalty of £60! All the time the subconscious is getting the message "you are under our control" and the idea is to program that reality so deeply that the person ceases to rebel and accepts what he or she believes is the inevitable. The obsession with 'political correctness' is also a method of subconscious thought control, as I will discuss later.
Political correctness is saying to the
subconscious "we are watching every word you say".
The subconscious sees all while the conscious notes only a fraction of what passes through the eyes and even changes much of that. Subliminal advertising was exposed in the 1950s when some television and movie theatre ads were found to be transmitting split-second images that the conscious mind couldn't see to stimulate a desire for a product. This included a subliminal "I'm thirsty" during drinks commercials. But the knowledge of subliminal programming goes back to ancient times with scholars like Plato and Aristotle mentioning the phenomenon and more than 500 scientific papers have been published confirming the effectiveness of subliminals.2
Producers of movies like The Exorcist and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre publicly admitted that they contained violent and frightening subliminals.3 The use of subliminals is supposed to be illegal in some countries and the Illuminati controlled Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) in the United States says that subliminals are inherently deceptive because the consumer does not perceive them at a normal level of awareness and is given no choice whether to accept or reject the message.
Funny then, that nothing is done about the subliminals that abound in advertising, let alone in political manipulation. The US Federal Communications Commission, currently headed by Colin Powell's son, Michael, a Bush appointment, has no regulation barring subliminal advertising, but generally considers it deceptive, it says. Again, why no action? The picture in Figure 54 carries a very clear subliminal message, or at least it's clear when it's pointed out. Can you see it? Apparently, about five per cent seethe subliminal at first sight and the rest are amazed when it is made clear to them.
If you haven't seen it, look at the white areas and not the plants. Your eyes go to the, plants, but it is most often in the background that subliminals are posted. We consciously see the apparent focus of the ad while the background passes us by. Look at the lower level of the two plants on the left and you will see that they combine to make the letter S in the white background. Move your eyes right and you'll see an E and an X. Oh yes, of course, I can see it now.
Why couldn't I see it before, it's so obvious?
Until the subliminal was explained, the conscious mind was not in the game, only the subconscious. Once it is highlighted, the conscious mind registers the word because it is no longer subliminal or below its threshold. Every time you look at that picture from now on you will see that once-subliminal word immediately. It is crucial to communicate the manipulation techniques and methods of the Illuminati because once people understand how they work they are no longer subliminal and can be clearly identified.
Hey, and guess what they call these subliminal additions to advertisements? Embeds! Yes, the choice of the term 'embeds' or 'embedded' for the journalists assigned to military units is no accident.
This is what those journalists really are embedded distorters. They are subliminal embeds planted to give the appearance of journalism while merely reporting the official line. I have often said that the Illuminati manipulate the people by manipulating the image they have of something, rather than with the detail. They know that people don't retain detail from the television or even newspapers. They go away with an image, a feeling, about a person or event.
Tell the people something over and over and at the level of the image, the feeling, they will overwhelmingly accept the image to be a true picture of events even though there is no detail to back it up. They keep 'repeating the same mantra over and over like 'weapons of mass destruction', "al-Qaeda was responsible", and “it was Bin Laden".
This is simple hypnosis.
Can you see the subliminal message in this image.
Apparently about 5% of people see it immediately
People hide their sexual feelings because they are at odds with what the mass hypocrisy dictates is 'moral' and 'decent'. Stuff that. I have a simple philosophy: do what you like so long as everyone involved has made a free choice to be involved and there is no compulsion or manipulation to do so.
Once those criteria are met, who cares what other people do? It's no one's business, but theirs. For goodness sake, it's all an illusion anyway. Is it immoral for an illusion to have sex with an illusion, even with more than one? What?
Well don't do what they do then, darlin'. Most of the time, beyond the denial, they'd actually love to go next door and join in. But no, "that's disgusting my mother said".
You get those campaigners against pornography who condemn some video as disgusting and depraved while watching one after the other. It's all in the name of research, see. The tabloid media is full of sexual themes and pictures designed to attract readers through the genitals while condemning people in the public eye for their sexual antics.
It is the old carrot and stick technique; pull them in and then push them away.
Lionel Rubinoff wrote in The Pornography of Power:
What happens as a result of all this' is that the subconscious is drawn to sexual themes while the conscious is in denial of them and this is one major reason why advertising subliminals are overwhelmingly sexual. Look at the picture in Figure 55.
A sexual picture, but the subliminal makes this far more blatant.
Can you see it?
The image itself is quite overtly sexual in this case, but I wonder if you can see how much more blatant it is on a subliminal level? Take your eyes to the waistline of the jeans, just left of centre and follow the carefully designed shading upwards from there. See it? You could hardly miss it once it is highlighted!
Again, whenever you look at that picture from now on you will spot the subliminal immediately because it has registered with the conscious mind. You see ads with men naked from the waist up or women naked from the back and such like because the mind 'fills in' the rest consciously or unconsciously.
Such subliminal images are not ran at all. It is staggering how commonly they are used in advertising of all kinds. The Ponald's ad in Figure 56 is supposed to be for chicken. Maybe I have lived a sheltered life, but I've never seen any part of a chicken that looks like that. I have seen dicks that look like that, but not chicken. Maybe it's a rooster. Next time you see a can of Diet Coke (for your sake don't drink it!) look at the glass on the lower left.
Hold the can at arms length away from you and you'll see women's breasts.
McDonald's Chicken Mc Dickets.
Ever seen one of these on a chicken?
The subconscious is attracted to the sexual theme while the conscious mind is suppressing its sexuality and, in effect, denies the sexual implants and doesn't see them. To confirm the point, people accessing the subconscious during hypnosis and those in more sexually open societies see subliminals far more easily.
The findings of Viennese neurosurgeon, Otto Poetzle, in 1917 suggested that information implanted subliminally appears in dreams and involves the same denial to hide taboo images.
The penis might appear in the dream in the form of a banana, for instance, or, if you're not so lucky, an asparagus. At the website of Jim Hagart's Semi Subliminal World, you can find subliminals highlighted in other Coca Cola products like Dr Pepper, Lilt and Fanta's. They include distorted faces, 'gremlins' and the usual sexual themes.
By the way, the target market of Diet Coke is overwhelmingly women and the subliminal use of women's breasts is an example of the technique of planting subliminals of women's sexual parts in ads aimed at women and men's in those targeting men. Being attracted to people of the same sex is even more taboo and the denial of the conscious mind hides the subliminal from view even more effectively, while attracting the subconscious to the ad. That is why they do it.
Wilson Bryan Key is one of the world experts on subliminals and has produced a number of highly recommended books on the subject.
For this very reason, many are in complete denial of the existence of the global conspiracy and its other-dimensional expression. It is just too much for them to take emotionally because of the perceived implications for their own lives. Thus people like me are dismissed as crazy or dangerous by many without any reference to the endless detail and evidence available. It is the 'shoot the messenger' syndrome when you don't like the message.
You can give these people as much supporting
detail and evidence as you like and they will still be in denial.
I had a guy call in to a South African radio show I was on who went into long-winded explanations for why each element of the conspiracy was explainable without a conspiracy. It was not worth debating with him because no matter what scale of evidence you presented he would have to find a way to deny the conspiracy.
People support despots like Bush and Hitler because they try to persuade themselves that their leaders have the people's best interests at heart. To face the fact that they are vicious dictators with a Nazi agenda is too much to bear. They deny the obvious over and over until they cannot deny it anymore. By then it's too late.
This happened in Nazi Germany and
happening in the United States and Britain today.
I have heard some political speeches played backwards to me and there certainly appears to be truth in this. It is the same with reversed pictures like the one highlighted in Figures 57 and 58. When the picture is the right way up it appears to be a simple; even boring, advertisement for a flooring company.
Look at the picture reversed and there again you have the obvious sexual connotations.
Figure 57 and 58:
This appears to be a simple. even boring advertisement, until you turn it upside down.
The subconscious views reality from all angles
and so registers the upside down image as much as the right way up
This ad was pulled from a phone book once the reverse image was noticed. Often it is the most apparently innocuous and uninspired ads that contain the most powerful subliminals. The more disinterested you are in the ad the more open you become to subliminals because the conscious mind is not getting in the way of the direct communication between subliminal and· subconscious. The idea is not to get you to remember the ad, but to plant a 'subliminal message like a hypnotist's command that can be retrieved days or weeks and months later when you are walking around the supermarket.
The subconscious programming is triggered when people see the product on the shelf and they follow the command to buy it. Most print advertising is designed to be looked at for less than one second and the ads are there for subconscious implantation, not conscious awareness.
Wilson Bryan Keys says:
Key says minds that operate in linear reasoning (deeply entranced by the five-sense reality) appear more susceptible to subliminals. This is still another motivation of the Illuminati to maintain the population in the five-sense illusion. You can buy paper today implanted with subliminal messages of your desired theme.
When you send a letter or circular the person thinks they are only reading the words they can see. In truth, their subconscious is also absorbing the message they can't see hidden in the paper. A class of eighth graders took a self-esteem test in 1983 on paper implanted with the subliminal message, "You are loved".
They scored 15% higher for self-esteem than those who took the test with non-subliminal paper. When the same test was given to under achievers they scored 34.7% higher with the subliminal embeds.9
The same techniques are naturally exploited to program negative or controlling messages. All of our senses are targeted by the subliminal mc1nlpulators. Messages are played to us just outside the frequency range that our hearing can consciously access. These subliminal words bypass our conscious awareness and enter our minds at a subconscious level.
I came across an advertisement on the Internet for subliminal tapes designed to manipulate people to have sex with you.
(Do you mind finishing this chapter before rushing to order? Thanks.)
The recording industry includes subliminal audio programming in its products to manipulate the consciousness and reality of the buyer. Dr Hal C. Becker patented a black box in the 1960s to pipe audio subliminal messages on top of another audio source. It was used in stores to plant the message "don't steal" and theft dropped by 37%.
Think how sophisticated and undetectable such technology must be now. If it can tell you subliminally not to steal, it can also tell you to buy, buy, buy; who to vote for; and what to think.
Such subliminal instructions are pouring
from our televisions, CDs and the media in all its forms. Even most
people involved with the media have no idea this is going on.
Without the glasses he sees normal advertisements for Coke or holiday destinations and articles in magazines, With the glasses he sees the subliminal instructions "obey", "don't question authority" and 'I do as you are told", This is happening around us all the time. With the glasses he also saw similar messages in 'news' magazines and Bryan Wilson Key has indeed identified subliminals in magazines like Time.
In one example when the US government was targeting Libya's Colonel Gaddafi his cover picture was embedded with the subliminal words "sex" (attraction to the magazine and "kill" (to plant negative feelings about him).
The anti-Gaddafi propaganda campaign was conducted by CIA Director William Casey and operations officer Vincent M. Cannistraro answering to Secretary of State, George Shultz, the advisor to George W's 'election' campaign and a major player in Bechtul (Bechtel Corp.), which has benefited so handsomely from the invasion of Iraq. Time also put the word "sex" on the forehead of the Ayatollah Khomeini on the front cover on November 26th 1979, according to Key Y.
These are the people telling you what is happening in the world, including who was responsible for 9/11!
Another piece of subliminal kit is the tachistoscope projector that flashes words and images onto the screen for milliseconds, far too quick for the conscious mind to acknowledge. These are used in film and video production and advertising.
People connected to instruments while watching tachistoscope subliminals did not report a conscious awareness of any stimuli, but the alpha and theta waves in their brains were effected and so was their heart rate. The manipulation of lighting and background sound is also used in conjunction with the visuals.
Other subliminal techniques include the
double meaning or double entendre when a sexual or other meaning
could be taken from a phrase or situation that can have another more
mundane explanation; and 'dissonance', when something is incongruous
or· out of proportion to the picture.
Wilson Bryan Key writes:
Repression of our fears and feelings provides the major distortion because we delude ourselves into believing our own self-deception. Psychiatrist R. D. Laing defines repression as when "we forget something, then we forget we have forgotten".14
We believe our own lies because we have forgotten we have lied in the first place. Research has revealed how emotional security, confirmation of self worth, gratifying the ego, a sense of power, sense of roots, fear of financial hardship and fear of death or desire for immortality can all be influenced subliminally.
This need for security and self worth is manipulated mercilessly by advertisers and government spinners. The 'war on terrorism' targets almost 100% the fear of death and the desire for perceived safety and security for self and family. But before you can control people through such fears you have to make them fear m the first place.
The 9/11 attacks make them fear and you exploit that fear consciously and subconsciously to justify the 'war on terrorism'. All the "terror alerts" and warnings that spew from the White House, the Pentagon and Downing Street are designed to continually underpin the sense of fear that can then be exploited to advance the agenda.
The more fearful and insecure you are, the more the Matrix has you.
Dr William Sargant, a psychiatrist with the Illuminati Tavistock Institute in Britain, wrote in his 1957 book, The Battle for the Mind:
The owners of Seagrams have been the Illuminati Bronfman family in Canada who have featured in previous books. Many images, phrases and slogans have hidden or double meanings behind them.
Symbolism can also go into this category.
The ancient Illuminati symbol of the pyramid with the capstone missing or the pyramid and all-seeing eye was placed on the dollar bill in 1993 by president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, one of the highly significant front men for the Illuminati in the United States during the 20th century. The most obvious Illuminati symbol is the eternal flame or the lighted torch and this represents the 'Illuminated ones', the' initiates illuminated into knowledge that the rest of the population is denied. The Illuminati lighted torch is most famously held by the Statue of Liberty.
This was given to New York by French Freemasons in Paris who knew what she and the torch really symbolized. There is a virtual mirror image of the Statue of Liberty on an island in the River Seine in Paris (Figures 59 and 60). As the bloodlines came up into Europe and across the world they naturally brought their symbols with them.
The Statue of Liberty is the symbolic image of the goddess worshipped by the Illuminati bloodlines since they were based in Babylon (and before).
Figure 59 and 60:
The Statue of Liberty presented to New York by French Freemasons in Paris
... where on an island in the River Seine you will find the statue's mirror image.
They are holding the torch of the 'Illuminated ones' the flame of Nimrod/Baal/Tammuz
She goes under many names, including Queen Semiramis, the "branch bearer", who was symbolized as a dove.
If you look at Figure 61, you can see the image of Queen Semiramis on an ancient coin and compare that with her representation as the Statue of Liberty. When the Illuminati bloodlines moved their headquarters to Rome, the goddess was worshipped as Venus Columba or "Venus the Dove". The French word for dove is still colombe.
This is why a man who signed his name "Colon" is known to official history as "Columbus". He was bearing the branch of the dove into the Americas in 1492 and was given this symbolic name relating" the Illuminati goddess. We have the centre of US government located in Washington DC - the District of Columbia, or the dove, Semiramis.
...with the symbol of the woman and the lighted torch - the symbol of Nimrod/Baal/Tammuz in Babylon.
Both "Libertys" are symbolic representations of Queen Semiramis,
The Illuminati use what I call reverse symbolism.
They place their symbols all around us, but present them with the reverse of their true meaning. The dove symbolizes peace to most people, while to the Illuminati bloodlines it represents their goddess, Queen Semiramis. The lighted torch means freedom and liberty to the population, but to the Illuminati it is the very symbol of their agenda and control.
The Nazis reversed the ancient symbol of the swastika to symbolize the negative and Satanists have reversed the pentagram or five-pointed star to point downwards for the same reason. Everything is symbolism and ritual to the Illuminati, and always has been'. After they killed President Kennedy in Dallas in 1963, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry placed an obelisk in Dealey Plaza with a lighted torch at the top.
When they buried Kennedy at Arlington Cemetery in Washington DC they placed a lighted torch, the Illuminati eternal flame, on his grave. The spot where people leave their tributes to the murdered Princess Diana in Paris is a massive representation of the flame held by the Statue of Liberty. It is located on top of the Pont de L' Alma Tunnel where the Illuminati arranged for her to die in 1997 (see The Biggest Secret for the background to Diana's murder and the 'Goddess Diana' symbolism involved).
The name Capitol Hill is also Illuminati symbolism and named after Capitoline Hill, a sacred place for the Illuminati outside Rome during the Roman Empire. The more that I understand about the manipulation of the subconscious, the more the Illuminati obsession with symbolism takes on an even greater significance. These Illuminati symbols speak to the subconscious and implant messages relating to control and "we're watching you" while the conscious mind is oblivious of what is going on beyond its perception.
The Illuminati use of code words and phrases are designed to have the same effect.
Stewart Swerdlow confirms what I have been saying in my books for years,
He says that the 'Santa Claus' story is an example of this.
The myth of Father Christmas or St Nicholas is an old Pagan tale and he was depicted wearing green. It was Coca Cola who gave him a red suit in a massive advertising campaign and he became known as Santa - an anagram of Satan.
All the major symbols of 'Christmas', including the tree, holly and mistletoe, come from Pagan festivals.
Swerdlow also highlights the enormous number of television programs for children that present reptilians as their friends and he says that the baby in the centre of the Sun, as depicted in the Tellytubbies series for small children, is a reptilian religious symbol.
One of the more crass and incompetent attempts at subliminal manipulation came in the Bush presidential campaign in 2000 when a political ad placed by the Republican National Committee flashed the word 'RATS' over a Gore prescription drug proposal (Figure 62).
Gotcha! The Subliminal implant of ‘RATS’ in a Bush commercial
attacking Al Gore in the 2000 election campaign.
It was not subliminal enough and could be seen by slightly slowing down the tape
It was left up too long in the same way that a subliminal flash of President Francois Mitterrand was spotted in the opening titles of a French news program when he was seeking election. The Bush 'RATS' tape only had to be slowed down slightly to be clearly visible. Let no one kid themselves that subliminal messages (or "subliminable" as George Bush called them) are not pouring from political advertisements.
Note how the background behind Bush is always full of pictures of his family when he is announcing the certain death of families in countries his masters want to conquer. It is all aimed at the subconscious. Operation Iraqi Freedom, the title the Pentagon spinners gave to their human slaughter in Iraq, was devised for the same reason.
The names for these military invasions are designed solely to depict what the spinners want the public to believe the war is all about. Any news organization worth associating with the name journalism, would acknowledge the title Operation Iraqi Freedom once when it was first announced and then never mention it again.
To do so is to knowingly allow you and your viewers to be manipulated. Instead, when I was in America during the war, I saw news networks like CNN and Murdoch's Fox News, displaying "Operation Iraqi Freedom" on the bottom of the screen for much of the time. That was speaking constantly to the subconscious while the conscious mind was watching the pictures on the rest of the screen. It was a disgrace, but then most of those that control such organizations are intellectual prostitutes anyway, so what do they care?
And I'm not sure about the intellectual bit.
I have seen NLP described as "software for your brain" because it allows you to "automatically tap into the kind of experiences you want to have".20 Maybe, but like all knowledge, it can be used another way to tap into the kind of experiences you want others to think they are having. Does anyone believe that politicians, lawyers and salespeople learn the techniques of NLP primarily for personal growth or because they wish to manipulate the population, judges and juries or potential customers?
NLP was developed in the 1970s from the techniques of people like Dr Milton Erickson of the Milton Erickson Foundation in Phoenix, Arizona, and the founder of "Ericksonian Hypnosis".
This involves communicating,
Bypass client resistance?
Cut the Orwellian language and it means mind manipulation, tapping into the unconscious mind without the person's conscious knowledge to plant the thoughts you wish them to follow. NLP claims to train students to read others by noting their eye position and choice of language and so on. With the manipulative use of NLP the idea is to put your target into a trance state without them realizing it, just as a skilled hypnotist can do.
Dick Sutphen, an expert in subliminal programming, said that if a suggestion or command is given in this state,
Or creates the circumstance necessary to change the beliefs of someone else. This trance state is vital to mind programming because the conscious mind stands aside to allow the subconscious to be accessed, for thoughts to be planted.
The trance state is, appropriately,
connected to the most ancient part of
the human brain, the R Complex
or reptilian brain.
He could see it coming. Orwell used the term, 'Newspeak', for the language of manipulation and suppression. In Orwell's novel, the state controlled media use Newspeak and other linguistic trickery to spread its propaganda and brainwash the public.
Orwell explains in his essay Politics and the English Language, how,
Or, as he puts in 1984:
In the society predicted by Orwell, the names for government ministries were chosen to present the opposite meaning to their true function. The Ministry of Truth was there to falsify records; the Ministry of Peace was the one that orchestrated the wars; the Ministry of Love was "the really frightening one" that questioned and tortured suspects; and the Ministry of Plenty produced fake figures to convince the people the economy was doing well when there were major shortages because of the endless wars being fought. The forced labour camp was named the Joycamp.
This is what we have today. Ministries of information are there to spread disinformation; ministries of defense launch wars of conquest; departments of homeland security are there to secure control; "Operation Iraqi Freedom" was designed to hide the truth that it was really Operation Iraqi Slaughter and Conquest; the term 'democracy' is used as a cover for dictatorship.
Orwell's manipulators, like those manipulating our minds today, repeated the same statements over and over in the knowledge that in doing so it would indoctrinate the people to believe them through sheer repetition. The mantra about 'weapons of mass destruction' was a most obvious example as the public were prepared to accept the invasion of Iraq.
Puppets like Bush, Blair and Powell knew precisely what they were doing as they bashed out the same phrase hour after hour.
Watch for the repeated messages and you'll see what you are being prepared to accept next. Orwell's Ministry of Truth changed news items and documents that cast the authorities in a bad light. Once the original document was replaced it was destroyed.
This is what happens when the present
Fourth Reich finds 'documents' that support their claims and others
that "expose" those who challenge them.
In modern wars, like the invasion of Iraq, we hear the constant repetition of the term "mopping up operations". This disguises the reality behind "mopping up" - killing anyone still resisting the tyranny after the main battle is over. There is also the obscene term "collateral damage", which is Newspeak for slaughtering civilians in the name of freeing them.
"Pre-emptive strikes" is Newspeak for mass murder and conquest by attacking first.
The US Justice (Injustice) Department produced a law within the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003 to allow the government to strip American citizenship from anyone giving "material support" to any group designated as terrorists. The [In]Justice Department naturally decides who are considered terrorists.
But how can they take away someone's US citizenship when this is specifically forbidden by the Constitution? By Newspeak.
"Material support" for terrorists is a Newspeak phrase that means "any support we decide is support" and section 501 of the act says that Americans can voluntarily give up their rights to citizenship purely by their behavior.
To quote the Newspeak:
If you, in the opinion of the [In]Justice Department, give "material support" to terrorists (the designation of which they decide) you are voluntarily giving up your rights to citizenship. Once that is done your constitutional rights are ended. First they pass 'anti-terrorist' laws to do what they' like with foreigners they dub terrorists or supporters of terrorism, as with those held without charge, trial, or lawyers in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and then they use this all-embracing Newspeak clause to take away the citizenship of those Americans they are targeting so they can hold them indefinitely without charge, trial or access to a lawyer.
Another common Newspeak phrase to justify grotesque inequality of wealth distribution is:
You hear Tony Blair say this a lot.
This moves the emphasize of the "victim" of injustice from those working their butts off to make it through another week to those making a fortune exploiting those working their butts off to make it through another week.
When George Bush announced tax cuts that benefited people like teachers and firefighters by $350 to $500 a year and multi-millionaires by $88,000, the White House spokesman and master of mendacity, Ari Fleischer, said those very words:
Big brother speaks
This comment by boy George Bush is an example:
This asks us to believe that love = mass murder of civilians.
This is an apparently impossible contradiction or doublethink, but tens of millions of Americans and others 'believe that both are true.' Doublethink, and therefore crimes top (refusing to think anything ill of the government) are essential to tyrannies because their whole foundation is based on contradictions and lies.
The character called Winston in Orwell's 1984 defined doublethink or doublespeak as:
Here are some of the real meanings behind modern Newspeak that the spinners constantly work to camouflage.
The distorted use of these words arid others is designed to plant a false reality into the conscious, and, especially, subconscious mind.
This manipulates peoples to see
themselves and the world in a way that suits the ambitions of their
Such organizations are in daily search of those who are expressing a view that the Thought Police deem is inciting racial hatred.
You can even be charged with a "hate crime" for revealing true information that the thought police decide could "create an atmosphere" in which racial attacks or "crimes" could take place. To suggest that the official story of what happened to Jewish people in Nazi Germany is not 100% correct is to be branded a "hatemonger" and a "racist" by reflex action. No further debate is necessary for the psychological fascists; you are an "historical revisionist" (Newspeak for "racist" because you challenge the official version of history) and you must be castigated and condemned to public vilification.
George W. Bush called those who questioned his lies about Iraq as "historical revisionists" in the hope that the tainting of that term would undermine his gathering critics.
But strangely, if anyone says that the horrors of the Pol Pot genocide in Cambodia were exaggerated or that the Irish did not suffer as much as they claim from British rule and the potato famine, this is not considered racist or a sign of hatred against Cambodians or the Irish.
So isn't that racist to condemn one opinion of history and not the other? Why should Cambodians or the Irish suffer such discrimination by the Hate Crimes Unit? Surely that makes the Hate Crimes Unit guilty of a hate crime? Arrest them, I say.
Jewish people can state they would never drink from a bottle of wine that had not been opened by a Jew and that's fine, no problem. But a white person who says he would not drink from a bottle of wine that had not been opened by a white person is called a racist. Personally I don't care either way, just get me a glass. The 'Jewish' press can talk of the "plague of Jewish-Arab marriages" without any consequences (and nor should there be, however repugnant the comment might be). But if the Arab press talked of the "plague of Arab-Jewish marriages" they would be branded anti-Semitic.30
Jewish people can say they are the race chosen by God and above all other races, but when a white person says that his is the master race he is branded a racist and a "white supremacist". There are no chosen people or master races, white, Jewish, or blue with pink spots. There is only one consciousness. The body is a hologram, an illusion, so all claims to racial superiority or inferiority are the work of the mind-dead and the same goes for those so obsessed with race that they look for racism everywhere.
The point I am making, however, is that the Onvellian concept of the 'hate crime' is extremely arbitrary (though give it time) and basically depends on the power wielded by those controlling the policies of the hate crimes authorities. 'Hate crime' legislation is not about protecting minorities from discrimination, that's the movie.
The real reason for 'hate crime' laws is to stop legitimate debate and the free-flow of information and opinions that do not suit the manipulators.
Once you start making a person's thoughts and opinions a crime to express you are living in a totalitarian state. It is not racial hatred to suggest that official history is not correct, just as it is not racist against Americans to say that the official story of 9/11 is a lie from start to finish. This nonsense is exploited to stop proper investigation into people and events and has nothing to do with stopping racial hatred.
But this is the way Newspeak works; it is designed to manipulate the landscape of language and frighten people into keeping quiet for fear of being, dubbed a racist and hatemonger, with the consequences all that entails, in the hatred directed at you. I have experienced this after being targeted some years ago by purveyors of hatred masquerading as 'anti-racists' and yet there is not a racist cell in my body.
The whole concept of racism from my philosophy is silly. How can anyone be racist about a hologram? Ironically it is those who "cry "racist" most often who are the biggest racists and merchants of hate. They abscessed with it.
Israeli writer, Israel Shamir, highlighted this with regard to those who snout "anti-Semite" at everything that moves:
How can it be "anti-Semitic" to highlight the number of people loyal to Israel who are behind the wars of American conquest in the Middle and Near East that transform the Arab lands in line with Israel's desires? Or to state how many people loyal to Israel control the media and the flow of information? Would it be racist to point this out if the architects of the Bush policies were dominated by Arabs and American troops invaded Israel?
If highlighting bias is going to be denounced as racist, we might as well all walk away and let the world burn. Yet when British politician, Tam Dalyell, notes the obvious conflict of interest between the number of Israel-supporters in the Bush government and their policies favorable to Israel, he is dubbed an "anti-Semite".
If you are talking about racial inequality, where does it lie in this case?
Canadian writer Henry Makow, whose grandparents were victims of the Nazis, condemned the appalling treatment by the American and Canadian authorities of Ernst Zundel, who was dubbed a "hate criminal" for questioning the official story of the Holocaust. Civilized societies treat all people the same no matter what their color, creed, background or opinion. Tyrannies do not, and that means Canada and the United States are tyrannies.
This is a vital point if we wish to live in freedom. Either we have freedom of expression or we don't. You can't be a little bit free. You either are or you aren't. If you want the freedom to say what you want then you must give the same freedom to all others and defend that right when it is challenged, even if you don't agree with them.
Freedom of expression does not exist unless it applies to all. People in Nazi Germany did not have the freedom to speak out and warn the population about the real agenda of the fascists.
Look again at what the Nazi Propaganda Minister, Dr Joseph M. Goebbels, said:
All dictatorships want to curb this basic right to express your thoughts and opinions, but 'anti-racist' organizations and people who have targeted me, like Bernie Farber of the Canadian Jewish Congress and a Canadian lawyer called Richard Warman, at the amazingly titled Canadian Human Rights Commission, want to decide who has free speech and who does not.
Their like can be found across the world, but the moment their right of expression is challenged they are the first to squeal. Actress Brigitte Bardot was threatened with legal action for' attacking Islam, homosexuals, the unemployed, teachers and illegal immigrants, and calling for a return of the guillotine. She made the comments in her book, Un Cri Dans Le Silence.
She said gays were fairground freaks, teachers arrive at work with greasy hair wearing disgusting jeans and muddy trailers, and that 'the professional unemployed' don't even want to work illegally We may find her views either appalling and laughable, but they are her views and she has a right to them. What she does not have a right to do unchallenged is force her views on others or seek to introduce discrimination on the basis of her views.
But would' you rather live in a world in which she could express her thoughts, unpleasant as they may be, or one in which the Thought Police dictated to her - and therefore you - what you could and could not say? Her freedom of speech is actually yours. If everyone is not free then no one is.
Israel Shamir makes the point very well:
The vehicles for its imposition are the robot radicals with their hearts on their sleeves and their brains in the place where the Sun don't shine. They believe that we must remove any words, phrases or opinions that might upset anyone. Unless, of course, you are a target of these people for your allegedly politically correct words, phrases or opinions, in which case they seem to have no problem with hurling the very abuse in your direction that-they would condemn if it was issued from the mouths of anyone else.
The 'PCs', or Purveyors of Claptrap, are yet another Orwellian tyranny.
In an article headed "Politically-Correct Censorship Rampant in US Schools", the Australian and the Sunday Times reported the insane results of 25 years of political correctness. The article focused on a book by Diane Ravitch, a former American government official, called The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn.34
A reviewer in the Chicago Sun-Times said the book would cause readers to gnash their teeth as they read of the outrages against common sense.35
She reveals that a story entitled The 'Friendly Dolphin was rejected by one school committee because it discriminates against students who did not live near the sea.
A story called The Silly Old Lady was rejected because it contained a "negative stereotype" of an elderly woman who put too many gadgets on her bicycle. Another entitled A Perfect Day for Ice-Cream had to be rewritten without reference to ice-cream because of a ban in California on any mention of junk food. Other concepts banned by the Thought Police included disobedient children, ghosts, parents who quarrel, ski trips and birthday parties. In some schools, dinosaurs cannot be mentioned because they imply a theory of evolution that not all Americans agree with.
Such lunacy was being routinely introduced across America, Ravitch said, and the same is happening in Britain and elsewhere. These decisions are being made by the Orwellian "bias and security" panels that advise state education boards what children should read.
Ravitch says that these panels operate,
Note that: stripping away anything that is "potentially thought provoking". That is the idea and the agenda behind political correctness, as it was in Orwell's Big Brother society.
The Official Politically Correct Dictionary and Handbook by Henry Beard and Christopher Cerf 38 shows how far down the road we have travelled.
A person confined to a wheelchair is called "differently abled"; a person without a job is "unwaged" (the constant use of the prefix 'un' was part of Orwell's Newspeak in 1984, as in "ungood"); to be disabled is now to be "physically challenged"; your partner is your "significant other" to avoid the "sexual stereotyping" of boyfriend, girlfriend, husband or wife; if you are shorter than average you are "vertically challenged"; George Bush is not stupid, he's "mentally challenged"; a waiter or waitress becomes a waitron; women are wimyn or wimmin to avoid "man".
Mailman should be personperson then and manhole needs to be personhole? Then you have ableism, ageism, lookism, sizeism, weightism; all of them straight from. the Orwell dictionary. Political correctness now includes avoiding sports at school that involve anyone winning or losing. It might upset them, see. But why then don't they ban all exams to avoid winners and losers in academia?
Oh, it's OK to win if you excel in the classroom, but not if your gift is on the sports field. And that's the point.
These mind-fascists say they want to celebrate the diversity of people and then spend all their time destroying it, not least the diversity of the language. Yet more doublethink. When opinions or descriptions deemed unacceptable to these zealots are erased from use, it forces people into a land of saqleness, mediocrity and the inability to communicate what they really think and feel. The zealots decide what is right and wrong, acceptable and incorrect. They are mind-police, nothing less, and the ultimate racists, ageists, ableists, lookists, sizeists, weightists and chauvinists because they are more obsessed with identifying such people than anyone else on the planet.
I see an old lady and they see a potential victim of discrimination on the grounds of age. I see a woman and they see a potential victim of discrimination on the grounds of her sex. It is now politically incorrect to say" that someone is "crippled". Why? What are we supposed to do, encourage them to be Olympic champion for the one hundred meters? They will have other skills and abilities that an Olympic champion will not have.
So celebrate those advantages instead of being obsessed with the disadvantages. I have a right hand mangled by arthritis that I cannot use except for one finger to type. I am basically disabled in the right hand and not so good in the left, either.
So what am I then? Differently abled? No, call me crippled if you want, I don't give a damn. It does not matter unless it matters to me.
Surely what we should be doing is encouraging people to see that how others describe them doesn't matter; to free them from being effected by labels, whatever they are. When we impose rigid descriptions we emphasize the differences by developing a 'special' term for those that want to be treated like everyone else. You can't call people mentally handicapped any longer; they are "people with learning difficulties". But why do they have learning difficulties? Because they have a mental handicap. What have I got with the physical handicap in my hands then, digit turning difficulties?
I worked closely with the mentally handicapped for years and they are incredible people with abilities, not least in the way they can express love, that are a wonder to behold. What an insult to them to say that they must be called by some manufactured phrase because they might be upset or suffer discrimination. They're bigger than that, even if the thought-censors aren't.
People have different abilities, bodies and challenges. That's what makes for the glorious diversity of life. Why do these agents of discrimination want to hide that when it should be a source of celebration? I can't catch footballs any longer like I did when I was a goalkeeper because it's too painful. But I still intend to take Manchester United and the Miami Dolphins to court for the blatant discrimination of not playing me in their first team just because I have a crippled hand.
One of the most insane examples of political correctness came in my home town of Leicester when police raided a woman's house and took away her collection of china pigs after complaints from local Muslims. They said that the display of model pigs were "racially offensive" to them.39 Not as offensive as their idiocy is to me, mind. We should be tackling real discrimination on the grounds of handicap, race, or sex, not inventing a new industry of nonsensical Newspeak and political correctness that insults the intelligence of all involved.
But, then, from the Illuminati's point
of view, it is not crazy at all.
This is the true reason for political correctness and the gathering lack of emphasis on expanding the vocabulary of children and students. Orwell knew that as you reduce the number of words available, you contract correspondingly the ability to express your thoughts as "Yours."
To suppress words is to suppress thought, or, as Orwell said:
Listen to politicians and. the military in their public statements. They use glib phrases that lack the clear meaning that a bigger vocabulary of words would offer. They don't want to be specific, that's the idea, and incomprehensible Newspeak jargon is used for the same reason. The further you reduce the words (and through the generations even the awareness of them) the more bland communication becomes and the desire to write and read books will diminish.
Blandness is what the manipulators are looking for and any words that make a clear statement are targeted.
Wilson Bryan Key writes in The Age of Manipulation about his experience of writing a speech with others for US President Dwight Eisenhower:
The manipulators want to reduce the words available to express a thought and, through this, influence what and how people think. When the words to express a thought have gone, so has the thought because in this reality we think in words. The same happens to memory which cannot be consciously retained without the words to express it.
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines Newspeak as: noun, usage: often capitalized; propagandistic language marked by euphemism, circumlocution, and the inversion of customary meanings. Etymology: Newspeak, a language 'designed to diminish the range of thought,' in the novel 1984 (1949) by George Orwell.
There you have the key motivation of Newspeak:
A Newspeak engineer in 1994 says they are cutting Newspeak to the bone and every year there will be fewer words to use.
To do this, the Orwellian controllers targeted what they called ."Oldspeak", the language that had developed over thousands of years, and also "Old think", those ideas and attitudes resistant to the 'change' and 'reform' demanded by those in power. When Donald Rumsfeld described the resistance by Germany and France to the Iraq war as an example of "Old Europe" this was another attack on Oldthink.
Political correctness is an example of
the enforcement of Newspeak, but mostly it takes over simply by
repetition of use.
One of the worst crimes a citizen could commit was to read Goldstein's book that laid out in simple terms the structure of control under which the people were living. To read the book and to accept the contents was the ultimate thought-crime. More than fifty years ago Orwell described the technology of control such as the "Speakwrite", a voice recognition machine, and the "Telescreen", two-way television with only one channel that poured out the government propaganda. We are fast heading for that same situation today.
We may have endless channels, but they are basically the same one churning out the same unquestioned government line. Orwell talked of the "proles" or "proletarians", which made up around 85% of the Orwellian population. They were the unthinking masses and the authorities looked upon them as cattle, just as they do today. They didn't suffer the level of surveillance of those considered intellectually dangerous because they didn't question anything.
Then there was "prolefeed", the brain-numbing 'entertainment' and made-up 'news' for the masses to keep them dumbed down and incapable of free thought. Spot on. There was also the "unperson", someone removed from circulation and all files until he or she officially ceased to exist. To talk about an unperson was a thoughtcrime, just as to highlight the suffering, indignity and injustice imposed upon the inmates of Guantanamo Bay is considered to be "supporting the terrorists".
Anything in any publication that put the Orwellian government in a bad light was described in Newspeak as "malreported" or "malquoted" because the authorities were never wrong. We are also now seeing the Orwellian 'antiterrorism' programs being introduced to encourage and reward the public to spy on each other and report their neighbors, workmates, clients and even fellow students to the authorities.
Orwell's nightmare world is not coming,
As Orwell put it:
In fact all three are happening together, but his point is valid in the way history is perceived in this reality.
The Illuminati have always sought to rewrite history: The destruction and removal of the unique historical treasures and texts in the museums of Iraq was part of that.
One of the tasks of the Orwell character called Winston is to invent a biography of a fictional soldier named Ogilvy, who can then be honored by Big Brother in a public address.
After writing the description of Ogilvy's life, Winston marvels at how,
It is the same principle as faking the history of what happened to Private Jessica Lynch or the real story of 9/11. By presenting a false version of September 11th, which is now official history, a whole series of events have taken place, including mass slaughter, because the people have overwhelmingly accepted the lie. Look at American propaganda about its own history.
The people are taught about the glorious victories and how their nation has always been the bastion of freedom, justice and morality.
This fabrication colors the way many Americans view themselves and the actions of their government today.
The true history of the 'liberators', the United States and Britain, is one of breathtaking, grotesque, exploitation, imposition and mass murder on a scale that beggars belief. The US record on human rights is a disgrace and yet its official history emphasizes its wonderful record of giving freedom to the oppressed. Even today, America jails five to ten times more of its people per head of population than any of the developed countries - some seven times more than China.
The United Nations even removed the US from its Human Rights Committee.
Such is the delusion through the faking of US history that Texas representative, Dick Armey, gave this response to the UN decision:
No, it reduces your knowledge of your own country's history to a farce to believe for a moment that this is the case. If the truth about America and Britain was in the official historical record it would be so much more difficult to sell the lie to the people when another country is due to be 'liberated' by extermination.
Replacing Oldspeak with Newspeak is
also designed to eventually prevent the reading of historical
accounts through loss of the language and even the need to censor
history will be eliminated.
The biggest US media giant is AOL Time Warner and look at some of the holdings of this one company as of December 2002:
AOL Time Warner is followed in size by Disney, Viacom, Vivendi Universal (which merged with the Bronfman family's Seagam) and Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.
This network dominates television, movies and publishing. In 1997, the films produced by the four biggest motion picture companies, Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom) and Universal (Seagram) accounted for two-thirds of the total box-office receipts for the year.43
By 2003, only 20% of American' newspapers, even local ones were not owned by the media corporations and the same can be found across the world. Michael Powell, the son',of Collin Powell, and head of the US Federal Communications Commission, is seeking to still further increase the share of the media that one company can own and Tony Blair is doing this in Britain.
Both are serving their hidden masters. With this level of media control, imagine the potential for programming the people with the same lies and disinformation; the same conditioned view of reality; the same Newspeak and subliminals. Imagine, too, the potential for the suppression of information and views that challenge and expose the official lies. When Alice in Wonderland and The World Trade Center Disaster was published, copies were sent to every major television program, radio station and newspaper in Britain and America.
It is an expose of the lies surrounding 9-11 and yet out of all those media organizations only one, the Sunday Herald in Scotland, contacted me. Even then they wrote a story about me that did not mention the content of the book. Such is our free society. The Illuminati dictate the policy and view of almost all areas of society. Often through their 'charity foundations', they fund 'scientific' research (insisting what the outcome will be before the money is handed over - see And the Truth Shall Set You Free).
This aims to hold the scientific party line about the nature of reality. They also own the pharmaceutical cartel that funds the 'medical' system training the doctors and dispensing their lethal drugs and destructive vaccines. They own the translational 'food' corporations that dictate what the people eat. They own the drinks corporations that decide what the people drink.
They own the oil supplies and power companies on which modem society depends. All these aspects of Illuminati control are coordinated from a central point to lay siege to our bodies, minds and freedom of choice. But by far the most vital strand in that web is the ownership of the media to dictate what the people think. It is through the mind and emotions that the game is played with the subconscious reality the number one target.
I have long been exposing the central
ownership of these apparently unconnected areas of society and at
last far more people are beginning to see it.
So armed with this knowledge you target the subconscious with an explosion of messages designed to program its beliefs with the sense of reality that suits you. You are literally hypnotizing the population. A hypnotist wants to get you relaxed and into a trance-like state that allows powerful access to the subconscious mind. He or she will then implant the messages they want you to follow when you think, and I emphasize think, the hypnosis is over.
The story of the man who was told not to see his daughter when he came 'out' of his hypnotic state is a good example. The human population is caught in the same hypnotic trance, following the commands planted into the subconscious mind. This brings us back to the Reptilian connection. At the heart of this conditioning, appropriately, is the most ancient part of the human brain known by scientists as the R-complex or reptilian brain. It is the result of our reptilian genetic history.
The Reptilians behind the Illuminati naturally know better than anyone how to manipulate the reptilian brain and it is through this that humanity is largely controlled and directed. The human brain is in two parts, or hemispheres. We have the right brain and the left-brain that are connected by a mass of nerve fibres. The left side is 'rational', 'logical' and 'intellectual'.
It works closely with the physical senses and can be summed up by can I "touch it", "see it", "hear it", "smell it" or "taste it"?
It communicates through spoken and written words. The right brain is where we manifest imagination, intuition, instincts, dream-states and the subconscious. It is the artist, musician and creative inspiration. It communicates through images and symbols, not words.
This right side is closely related to the reptilian part of the brain. Reptiles communicate through imagery and symbols - like the Illuminati secret society network - and this makes the reptilian brain most open to conditioning by movies and television.
Researcher Skip Largent writes:
This is what the Illuminati are doing through their subliminals and symbolism. The movie and television industries are not only owned by the Illuminati; they overwhelmingly created them. They understand how visual images can be used to condition the population. In normal circumstance the reptilian-dominated right brain receives images through the eyes or the imagination and the left brain decodes those images into thoughts and conclusions.
The Illuminati have intervened in this process, however, to control human perception. Their aim is to disconnect the functions of these two distinct parts of the brain so we can be manipulated through the right brain while only being aware of the left - or manipulated through the subconscious while only being aware of the conscious. They plant images into the right brain (the dream-state, the non-conscious) using symbolism, subliminal imagery and pictures, while often telling the left-brain how it should interpret those images.
This is done through 'education',
'science' and 'the media.'
The left brain is told by external sources how to decode right brain images. What we urgently need to do is regain control of our left brains and decide for ourselves what we are seeing. Another aspect of the reptilian mind is the 'hive' mentality and they have sought, very successfully so far, to transfer that hive or herd state to the human population. This is one reason why they are so desperate to destroy individuality of all kinds. You will find that words like imagination, imagine, dream and suchlike are used widely in advertising.
They know that if they can use those trigger words that encourage the right-brain, non-conscious, daydream state, they can access your subconscious mind with imagery and then tell your left brain how to decode that into conscious language - I want that car; I think the police should be given more powers to stop crime; I need Viagra to be a real man again; we need a world government to solve our problems. Television and movies are producing a fantasy world of make-believe to open up the unconscious right brain and allow the Illuminati secret access through that to the conscious mind. Television and movies are packed with subliminal messages.
Children are most at risk from this and they are being targeted by fantasy images to this end. In early childhood the mental state is controlled almost exclusively by the reptilian brain and the purveyors of children's 'entertainment', like Disney, exploit this knowledge. I was also interested to find an article in the Los Angeles Times that highlighted another trait of the reptilian brain - greed and excess.
The article was headed "Living Ever Larger; How Wretched Excess Became a Way of Life in Southern California".
French anthropologist G. Clotaire Rapaille is quoted as saying:
This is how the reptilian mind sees reality and this is the world we live in because the Illuminati are reptilian. The whole focus is on survival and the Matrix consciousness has perhaps projected these sentient programs in a reptilian form because nothing concentrates the mind more than the fear of not surviving. We are their energy source and, through them, an energy source for the Matrix itself.
They are seeking to control us and maintain the flow of fear energy. Their apparent arrogance is a cover for panic. What completes the circle is that once programmed with an externally implanted reality, the people who have built their prison then police it to keep the others in. Anyone who has another reality at odds with the manufactured consensus is ridiculed, condemned and generally abused for refusing to conform to the prevailing illusion.
Newspeak is designed to remove even the language available to describe any other reality, except the one the Illuminati wish to perpetuate. Round and round we go, one programmed generation programming. the next, each more emphatically than the last. The walls close in by the day.
But it doesn't have to be like this.
We can and will break the circle and we
shall now look at how this is being done.