The Fourth Reich (or the continuation of the third)

If you want to rule the world, you need to control oil. All the oil. Anywhere.

Michel Collon


The pioneers of a warless world are the youth who refuse military service.
Albert Einstein

Since September 11th, the Illuminati agenda and manipulation techniques have become ever 1nore blatant as they have used the United States and Britain to impose their global control. I am going to look in detail at the appalling events that have followed 9/11, especially the invasion of Iraq and the 'war on terrorism', because the hidden hand of the Illuminati and their methods of operation could not be more obvious.


Understanding this is vital to preventing a repeat throughout the world. I have described the background to the invasion of Afghanistan in considerable detail in Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster. They used the excuse of their own terrorist attacks on September 11th to invade a stone-age country in the middle of a famine and impose their own regime under the puppet leadership of Hamid Karsai.


He is a former advisor to the major Texas-based oil company, Unocal, which planned to build an oil and gas pipeline from the Caspian Sea region across western Afghanistan to the Arabian Sea coast of Pakistan, but could not do so while the Taliban were in power. There is an Illuminati frenzy to control and tap the enormous reserves of oil and gas around the Caspian Sea and, because it is land locked, they need to build pipelines to transport it to world markets. Countries like Afghanistan and Iran are on the potential pipeline routes (Figure 6).


Unocal had no problem negotiating with the Taliban through the 1990s to build their pipelines across Afghanistan and nor did the US State Department. However, public opposition to the deal in the face of the Taliban's human rights abuses, not least against women, made the deal impossible. Unocal pulled out of the project in 1997 saying that the pipeline could not be built until an internationally recognized regime was in power in Afghanistan.


Thanks to 9/11 and the claims that the 'Afghanistan-located' CIA-asset, Osama bin Laden, was responsible (based on no evidence), the Illuminati-controlled United States and British governments could send in the bombers to remove the Taliban and replace them with the Unocal employed Hamid Karsai.1

Figure 6

The pig-trough frenzy to control the massive Caspian Sea oil and gas reserves

is one major reason why the US government, supported by Britain's Tony Blair,

targeted Afghanistan after 9/11,

This is the approximate route of the Unocal pipeline


On December 31st 2002, after the removal of the Taliban George W. Bush appointed a man called Zalmay Khalilzad as his 'special envoy' to Afghanistan to oversee the 'transition' to the new post-Taliban regime. Khalilzad, an Illuminati operative, was chief consultant to Unocal on the Afghanistan pipeline project!


He co-wrote in the winter 2000 issue of The Washington Quarterly:

“Afghanistan could prove a valuable corridor for this [Caspian Sea] energy as well as for access to markets in Central Asia."

He had tried to overcome the problem that the Taliban was not internationally recognized by publicly lobbying for the US government to 'reengage' with the regime that caused untold murder, torture and suffering, and he defended the Taliban against allegations of sponsoring terrorism.! It was partly on Khalilzad's advice that the Clinton Administration funded the Taliban through Pakistan intelligence, even paying the salaries of high-ranking Taliban officials.2


So long as the Taliban played the game with the pipeline, who cares what they do to their people?


When this plan went pear-shaped and the pipeline had to be shelved, Khalilzad changed his position to suit the circumstances. As a State and Defense Department official during the Reagan-Bush administrator, he helped to supply the Mujahadeen with weapons during the occupation by the Soviet Union, the period when Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda were funded and armed by the United States.


As Bush's special envoy to Afghanistan, it was Khalilzad who helped to oversee the change-over from the 'transitional' government led by fellow Unocal front man, Hamid Karsai, to the fully-fledged' Afghanistan' government with Karsai again the puppet president answerable to the United States. As a result of this, the pipeline that Karsai and Khalilzad were both employed to make happen, is now going ahead.




Khalilzad comes from one of the old ruling elite families in Afghanistan and his father was an aide to King Zahir Shah, who ruled the country until he went into exile in 1973. Thanks to the installation of Hamid Karsai, a representative of Zahir Shah, the king returned to the Presidential Palace in Kabul in 2002. Since the removal of the Taliban the opium production in Afghanistan has soared to fuel the heroin market, controlled by the Bush family and their associates and masters, exactly as planned.


Zalmay Khalilzad was later appointed by Bush to be his envoy to Iraq, so he could play the same scam there in arranging for a US-controlled 'Iraqi' government to replace Saddam Hussein.


More about Khalilzad shortly - there is plenty to know.

According to plan

The invasion of Afghanistan, like 9/11, had been planned for a long time and it was the same with the conquest of Iraq in the spring of 2003. Time magazine reported that during a briefing for three senators by the National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice, in March 2002, President Bush poked his head into a White House meeting room and bellowed,

"Fuck Saddam. We're taking him out!" 3

This was a year before the invasion and yet, only weeks before the troops went in, we had Bush, Blair and their fellow travelers in government still saying that war was not inevitable!! If they ever told the truth they would have a seizure from the shock


The plan to take Control of the Gulf region using Saddam Hussein as the excuse was in place long before Bush and the rest of his Illuminati mafia were illegally placed in power against the will of the people in late 2000. An article by writer Nicholas Lemann in the New Yorker revealed that after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, Dick Cheney, now the Vice President, formed a group to plan a strategy for the 1990s and beyond.4


This group included the current Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, the current Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, the current Secretary of State Colin Powell and Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, Cheney's chief of staff.


The aim was to 'shape' the world in their desired image or, as another member, Zalmay Khalilzad, put it ... to "preclude the rise of another global rival for the indefinite future".


Yes, the same Zalmay 'Unocal' Khalilzad who would be named Bush's special envoy to Afghanistan before 9/11 followed by the same role in Iraq at the time of the invasion.


Lemann says he was shown a copy of the document Cheney's group put together called Defense Strategy for the 1990 5: The Regional Defense Strategy, Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney, January 1993. This was the month that Bill Clinton was inaugurated and Cheney and father Bush left office. This 'strategy', planned in the early 1990s, is pretty much what the boy Bush and Cheney government is doing today - a government controlled by the people who put the document together.


The 'war on terrorism' was a response to September 11th?




Still more confirmation of this came with the publication of a secret document produced for the yet-to-be-not-elected Bush administration in September 2000, a year before 9/11 and two and half years before the troops were sent into Iraq.


The document was called Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources For A New Century; and was produced in September 2000 by the neo-conservative 'think-tank' called The Project for the New American Century (PNAC). You can read it in full at the PNAC website.5 This organization was created in 1997 by people like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and the report was produced for themselves and other highly significant names that are today at the heart of the Bush administration, including Paul Wolfowitz, now Rumsfeld's deputy at the Pentagon, and Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff.


Bush's younger brother, Jeb, the governor of Florida during the rigged presidential election, was also involved. The usual crowd in other words. Details of the document were published by the Sunday Herald in Scotland 6 and the contents precisely~ mirror events instigated since Bush and his controllers came to power.


It is a blueprint for US (Illuminati) global domination that reveals how Bush and his cabinet were planning to invade Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before they entered the White House in January 2001.


The PNAC report says:

"The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." 7

Note that phrase "provides the immediate justification". This is why Bush, Blair, Powell and Co lied and lied and used bogus "intelligence" to desperately make a case for the war in Iraq.


They didn't have a reason, so they had to invent one, as they did with Afghanistan, to follow the hidden agenda. Their first choice was 'weapons of mass destruction', a term that was repeated over and over on the basis of the more times you say something the more people are likely to believe you. As with 'Bin Laden did it', there was no proof or even evidence, only constant repetition of what they want the public to believe (see Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster for the Bin Laden background).


When Hans Blix and his UN weapons inspectors found nothing to support the claims about weapons of mass destruction, Blair and Powell became ever more desperate, detailing "compelling intelligence" that the weapons existed. This I evidence' turned out to be stolen virtually word for word from an analysis written 12 years earlier by a postgraduate student in California, but it was presented to the public as the work of British intelligence. It was lifted from an article by Ibrahim al Mirashi and even spelling and punctuation errors from the original were repeated.


They did, however, change words to· make them sound more sinister. Iraqi intelligence "monitoring foreign embassies in Iraq", became "spying on foreign embassies in Iraq".


Even that is nothing more than the CIA and British Intelligence do themselves.

"Aiding opposition groups in hostile regimes", was upgraded to "supporting terrorist organizations in hostile regimes" ..

I'm too sexy for my lies

Andrew Gilligan, a BBC Defense and Diplomatic correspondent, said he had been told by a significant source (later confirmed as British weapons inspector, Dr David Kelly) that a dossier on the Saddam 'threat' was changed by Blair's office on the orders of his minder and Spinner-in-Chief, Alastair Campbell.8 The intelligence report had not been "very revelatory" when it arrived at Downing Street, Gilligan says Kelly told him, but it was" transformed to make it sexier".


It was embellished to manipulate the people into supporting the war and included the outrageous claim that Saddam could deploy weapons of mass destruction in 45 minutes. Two other BBC reporters were told by Kelly in milder terms than the Blair press office (controlled by Campbell) changed the wording of the dossier. Blair said the BBC story was "as serious' an attack on my integrity as there could possibly be".9


But how can you attack something that does not exist?


Campbell was 'cleared' of the 'sexing up' allegation by a committee of MPs only on the casting vote of the chairman, a member of Blair's own Labour Party. This was done even though the committee acknowledged that its work had been "hampered" by the refusal to allow them access to intelligence papers and security services personnel! Hampered?? How can they make a decision about Campbell when they can't even interview1those involved?


They have to take his word for it, basically.




Campbell later announced he was resigning as Blair's 'Mr Spin', but the manipulation of the public mind will continue because lies are essential to the cover story. ' Then came the strange death of Dr Kelly, the source of Gilligan's report. He was 'outed' by Geoff Hoon's Ministry of Defense after he told them that he met Gilligan and could be the source of the report that had caused the government to make concerted attacks on the BBC.


Kelly was given a rough time by the Blair-controlled House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee when he appeared before then\. to be questioned about what happened; A few days later he went for a walk in the countryside near his home in Oxfordshire and did not return. He was found in a secluded wood with his wrist cut and the official story was that he committed suicide and bled to death. The inference was that the pressure had made him do it.


But this is the same David Kelly who faced the wrath of the Sad dam regime as a weapons inspector after the 1991 Gulf War and coped with something similar from Russian officials during an investigation there. This guy could stand his ground. Shortly before he left on his 'suicide walk' he emailed associates with "combative" comments about the pressure he was under from "many dark actors playing games". He said he hoped it would all blow over and he could get back to Baghdad and get on with the work that really mattered.


When he left his home, his wife, Janice, was unconcerned. Although she knew her 59-year-old husband was deeply upset, his mental state did not seem to be too down. Walking was a hobby and he often disappeared for up to two or three hours.


Paul Weaver, a local farmer, greeted Kelly as he strode through the fields close to his home and there was nothing to suggest a suicidal man.

"He smiled and said hello", Weaver recalled 10 Kelly had family matters to look forward to like the marriage of one of his daughters in October.

He was devoted to his wife and family and he did not show signs of someone who was about to kill himself. But then he was found dead, the police say, in an isolated wood with his wrist slashed with a pen knife. There was no goodbye to his wife and family, nothing. Does this make sense to you? Me neither. Blair's Ministry of Mendacity also said there was a link between Saddam and al-Qaeda until intelligence sources leaked the news that they had found no such connection. Intelligence professionals in the United States have taken a similar line.


A group of retired intelligence operatives said in a letter to President Bush:

"There is one unpardonable sin. Cooking intelligence to the recipe of high policy. There is ample evidence that this has been done in Iraq." 11

A member of the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency told the New York Times:

"The American people-were manipulated." 12

Clare Short, who resigned as Blair's international development secretary in protest at the spin, said he had misled the public over the scale of the threat posed by Iraq to ensure support for the war.

"I have concluded that the PM decided to go to war in August sometime and he duped us all along", she told the Sunday Telegraph. "He had decided for reasons that he alone knows to go to war over Iraq and to create this sense of urgency and drive it - the way the intelligence was spun was part of that drive." 13

His reasons were to follow the agenda of his unseen masters who put him into power and can either keep him there or cause his downfall. Short said that Blair secretly agreed with George Bush in the autumn of 2002 that they would invade Iraq the following spring "come what may".14 The secrecy that followed, in which even Blair's cabinet was kept out of the loop, hampered the planning for the aftermath of the war and helped to produce the "chaos and suffering" that ensued, she said.


Decisions were made in Blair's office in calls to President Bush, Short revealed, and in phone conversations between Blair's foreign policy advisor, Sir David Manning and National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice. Short said Blair had lied about wanting a second United Nations resolution supporting the invasion; he had lied by claiming that Iraq was "an immediate threat to us in 45 minutes"; and he lied that French President Jacques Chirac would veto a second resolution under any circumstances.


This was not true, said Short,15 Tony Blair lies more often and more obviously than any other British politician of modem times (despite the fierce competition) and one reason he gets away with it is because it is beyond the comprehension of many that anyone could lie so constantly and blatantly to the people he is supposed to serve. Well, he can and does - every day.


So do Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Powell and their cabal...


They are following the techniques of the Nazis, as outlined by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf:

"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will understand it. People can be made to perceive paradise as hell, and the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise." 16

In the United States, leaked information from the Department of Defense revealed that a top secret report by the Defense Intelligence Agency in September 2002 concluded they could find no evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq. Some CIA officials distanced themselves from the Bush administration claims that Iraq posed an imminent threat.


They said these claims were based on information given directly to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld by Ahmed Chalabi, the leader of the CIA-funded Iraqi National Congress and the man the Pentagon would like to be leader of Iraqi. More about him later. Reports quoted CIA sources as saying that Chalabi's 'information' was deeply suspect and largely based on hearsay from other defectors with vested interests in regime change (they made it up).


Bob Graham, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told the media that classified evidence that supported the Bush claims about Iraqi weapons was made public, but he said that as a member of the Intelligence Committee he saw much evidence that didn't support its case.

"That evidence was never declassified", he said.

All this when the United States and Britain have access to a satellite surveillance system that can read your number plate from space and this is how the Airman magazine described the capabilities of the Global Hawk unmanned surveillance plane deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq:

"On an early test, for example, Global Hawk flew at 56,000 feet over the Naval Weapons Center at China Lake, California. The images it gathered were so clear that an electro optical image stands out next to a FA-18 Fighter. An infrared image showed where concrete had cooled down from the shadow of a C-130 that had recently taken off."

And they couldn't locate :weapons of mass destruction'? Or find Bin Laden? Or Saddam Hussein?

Fakes and fantasy

Colin Powell and the United States claimed that a document existed to show that Niger had sold uranium to Iraq for nuclear weapons. This' document' was exposed as a crude fake by the International Atomic Agency. Joseph Wilson, the US ambassador to Gabon from 1992 to 1995, wrote in the New York Times how he had been hired by the CIA to investigate the alleged Niger connection and had found no evidence.


He communicated his findings to the US government and he said:

"Based on my experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war, I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.”18

They lied.


Powell told NBC:

“It was the information that we had. We provided it. If that information is inaccurate, fine.”19

No, darlin', it was information you made up to manipulate the people and that's not fine.


Quite simply, you were caught lying, Mr. Powell, the exposure of which is hardly brain surgery. Remember how Powell presented his 'evidence' to the United Nations Security Council with his make-believe charts, 'intelligence' satellite photographs and recordings of phone calls by Iraqi officials?


All bullshit - and he knew it. It was the same with the drone aircraft that we were told could attack the East Coast of the United States. Pure invention to sell a lie. When Bush and Co were caught out on the 'Iraq nuclear plans' fabrication they arranged for the CIA chief, George Tenet, to take the blame to protect them. He said it had been a CIA “error”. At the same time the Americans were distancing themselves from the 'nuclear' statements, Tony Blair was still saying that the intelligence was correct.


Mixed up the song sheets there then?


Powell told the United Nations in February 2003 that Saddam had authorized his field commanders to use chemical weapons. So why weren't they used when the US and Britain invaded? And why weren't the weapons he authorized found when the Iraqi 'army' was overrun? The United States Army commander in Iraq said after the war that nothing had been found to show the country's military was prepared to use them on US forces.


Lieutenant-General William Wallace, commander of the army's 5th Corps, said US forces had uncovered "no evidence of him trying to employ them directly against US troops”.20


Why the hell not? I thought Iraq's 'weapons of mass destruction' were a threat to the world and yet they aren't even used to defend their own country from invasion and takeover?


Powell was lying, as he was with his claims that Saddam's weapon-making units were housed in trucks moving from place to place. It would be laughable if the outcome of the mendacity had not been so tragic for the people of Iraq. Behind Powell when he made his UN address were blue drapes hung that morning to cover a massive tapestry reproduction of Picasso's famous anti-war painting called Guernica.


The UN's Stephane Dujaric, said:

“We needed the right background that would work on television."

Yeah, OK.


Powell also said that they had intelligence proof. that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, but could not give details for fear of exposing the informants to danger. Excuse me if I fail to believe that people like Powell really give a damn about exposing anyone to danger so long as the agenda is served. And hold on. How would it expose informants to danger if the US had simply told the UN inspectors where to look? With Saddam's regime removed, there was no danger at all to informants. So why didn't the Americans immediately follow their 'intelligence proof' and find the weapons?


Months after the war began, there was still nothing. The British cabinet minister, David Blunkett, is a former 'socialist' and now, in my view, the most right wing Home Secretary of modem times. He said even while the war was going on that no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons of mass destruction may be found, and yet this was the 'justification' for the war.


He said that, in any case, he rejoiced at the 'fall' of Saddam Hussein and his regime regardless of whether any weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq or not.21




But I still would not be surprised to see 'weapons' of some kind 'found' once they have managed to ship them there! As the lies were exposed Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said that Saddam may have destroyed the weapons before the war started!


Err, so why was there a war? Why didn't Saddam make this mass destruction very public to avoid being invaded?


Rumsfeld's 'deputy' and the real power in the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, told Vanity Fair that the claims about Sad dam's weapons capability were used to justify the war for "bureaucratic reasons".22


It was "the one reason everyone could agree on", he said. The other factor he described as "huge" was that an attack would allow America to pull its troops from Saudi Arabia and resolve a major grievance held by al-Qaeda. Oh, so the 'war on terrorism' involves giving in to the alleged terrorists, then? What nonsense. Pulling the troops out of Saudi Arabia is part of a strategy that will eventually send them back in again to take the country over.


But the best excuse for not finding weapons of mass destruction came, naturally, from George W. Bush.


He said in his weekly radio address on Sunday, June 22nd 2003, that they had been looted!! When the alleged weapons were not found in Iraq - or had not yet been planted - it was claimed that the finding of mass graves were justification enough for the war. What they didn't tell you was that those graves were overwhelmingly the result of uprisings being put down by Saddam after the 1991 Gulf conflict.


These rebellions were the result of encouragement from President's father George Bush, who then refused to support them and left the people to their fate - mass graves.

Shooting the messenger

The United Nation's Hans Blix said that American officials tried to discredit the work of his weapons inspectors in Iraq to further their own case for war. He told the BBC of his "disquiet" at how the documents the International Atomic Energy Agency "had no great difficulty finding out were fake", managed to get through US and UK intelligence analysis.


Also disturbing, he said, was the question of who was responsible for the falsification.23 As usual the fake documents to make the case for an Illuminati war did not" get 'through US and UK intelligence analysis"; they faked them in the first place, as per normal. After the conflict the United States and Britain refused to allow Blix and UN inspectors to return to Iraq to search for the alleged weapons. Instead, the provided its own inspection teams. Blix called for experts 'to return to the country to determine whether the weapons allegations had any foundation.


Are you kidding? Does he really think the criminals in the US and British administrations are really going to allow him back to prove they have been lying all along?


Tony Blair dismissed demands from members of his own Labour Party for an inquiry into how the public was misled about Saddam's 'weapons of mass destruction' that were cited as the reason why the war was necessary. He knows a proper, truly independent inquiry, would expose his mendacity.


Retired CIA intelligence analyst Ray McGovern, a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, said:

"Some of my colleagues are virtually certain that there will be some weapons of mass destruction found, even though they might have to be planted. I'm just as sure that some few will be found, but not in an amount that by any stretch would justify the charge of a threat against the US or anyone else. Even if the planting was discovered by and by, they'll say, 'OK, the weapon were planted fine”.

And remember: these genetic liars are the same people who have told the world what happened on September 11th, who did it, and how - the official story of 9/11 that has been used to 'justify' all that has followed. The idea that the invasion was about 'liberating' Iraqis is a grotesque joke. They were so desperate to sell the idea of an international 'coalition' that they included in their laughable list of supporting countries the Solomon Islands and Tonga. The Solomon Islands doesn't even have a military!


By March 30th 2003, Donald Rumsfeld was telling Fox [propaganda] News that the 'coalition' had now to 66 countries. It was simply another lie. Allan Kemakeza, Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands, said 'his country was not part of the coalition,' despite being listed.25


The Slovenian Prime Minister Anton Rop said the same and Croatia was listed even though its president, Stipe Mesic, condemned the war on Iraq as "illegitimate".26 The Czech Republic was listed when its president, Vaclav Klaus, said that anyone who thinks democracy can be imposed on Iraq is "from another universe".27


Or as investigative journalist, Wayne Madsen wrote in Counter Punch:

"Klaus means that people like Bush, Tony Blair, Rumsfeld and the other neo-Crusaders are just plain nuts. Indeed they are."28

But if you haven't got support, invent some. If you haven't got an enemy, invent one.


Author Joseph Schumpeter said of the [Illuminati] Roman Empire:

"There was no comer of the known world where some interest was not alleged to be in danger or under actual attack. If the interests were not Roman, they were those of Rome's allies; and if Rome had no allies, the allies would be invented." 29

The Bush message was:

"If you support us we are going to war with Iraq, if you don't support us we are going to war with Iraq."

It’s the mentality of the playground bully. People have asked why Bush and Blair would not listen to arguments for allowing UN weapons inspectors more time to search for the alleged 'weapons of mass destruction' and took no account of-the Massive global protests or opinions of other governments. The answer is that they were following the agenda of their unseen masters and nothing was going to divert them from that.


They wouldn't dare.

Inmates control the asylum

Blair, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and their like, knew they were peddling false information for no other reason than to provide the "immediate justification" to move into the Gulf in line with the Illuminati's long-time strategy for global control.


The Project for the New American Century report for the Bush cabal in September 2000 planned a,

"blueprint for maintaining global US preeminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests".30

What it calls this "American grand strategy" must be advanced for "as far into the future as possible" and it says that the US must "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars" as a "core mission" 31


American armed forces are described as "the cavalry on the new American frontier".32


The report also said:

Allies like the UK are "the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership". Peacekeeping missions demand "American political leadership rather than that of the United Nations" ...

Even should Saddam pass from the scene, the bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently, despite domestic opposition in the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US troops, as,

"Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has", North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran are dangerous regimes and their existence justifies the creation of a "world-wide command-and-control system" [World Army] China should be targeted for "regime change" and the report says "it is time to increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia" that may lead to "American and allied power providing the spur to the process of democratization in China".

"US Space Forces" should dominate space and it calls for the total control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" [anyone exposing the agenda] using the Internet against the US [Illuminati],

"The US should consider the use of biological weapons and that “new” methods of attack – electronic, ‘nonlethal’, biological – will be more widely available … combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes... advanced form of biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of the terror to a politically useful tool." 33

Once again, note the language: "specific genotypes" -  the biological targeting of particular races.


Who said Hitler was dead?


A major target for Illuminati genocide are the black peoples, especially of Africa, and that is why the manufactured of Aids' plague has been visited on that continent. I found it so sad that Live Aid's Bob Geldof could be so naive as to praise President Bush for helping Africa when the forces working through Bush are determined to destroy its people.


The strings attached money Bush pledged to "fight Aids" in Africa is a round of drinks compared with the wealth stolen and extorted from that continent by the 'West' every year. The sick minds behind this biological warfare targeting "specific genotypes" are the same people who had the nerve to say that Iraq must be invaded because it had biological weapons or, as their Newspeak mantra puts it: ''Weapons of mass destruction."


The veteran Labour Member of Parliament, Tam Dalyell, said of the PNAC report:

"This is a blueprint for US world domination -  a new world order of their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with a crew which has this moral standing." 34

But they are not fantasist Americans as such. They are fantasist initiates and pawns of the Illuminati that have placed their operatives in positions of power within the US government. Their focus is not with being American or what is best for Americans, but with using that nation to progress the Illuminati agenda for the global fascist state.


The reason that Tony Blair is so slavishly supporting the 'US' no matter what happens is because he is also an Illuminati placeman who is there to serve his hidden masters, just like Bush. Do as you are told, guys, and you'll be fine. Fail to deliver and "Houston, we have a problem". They are far more terrified of those who control them than they are of the consequences in public popularity.


The Bush group's blueprint for global domination summarized above is clearly unfolding by the month with the Iraq phase underway and Syria, Iran and North Korea already being targeted by the spinners who demonize countries as a prelude to invasion. The resistance they are facing in Iraq, however, is making their plans far more difficult and the lack of 'weapons of mass destruction' has produced an increasingly skeptical public. Blair's credibility is in tatters. It's not as straightforward as they thought it was going to be.


People may find the mention of China as a target to be a staggering suggestion, but, as I have mentioned in my books, talks and interviews for years, many different contacts have told me that it was all leading to a manipulated conflict with China.


In my book, The Biggest Secret, published two years before the Project for the New American Century document, I wrote:

" ... The plan is to engineer events, real and staged to create enormous fear in the countdown years to 2012. This includes a plan to start a third world war either by stimulating the Muslim world into a 'holy war' against the West or by using the Chinese to cause global conflict. Maybe both." 35

A CIA scientist I met in 1997 was only one of many people who have told me that a conflict with China is where the agenda is leading.


They want a global war for the same reason they wanted the two in the 20th century. A global problem opens the way to a global solution -  the creation of a world government and army to "prevent another war". With the world economy in a catastrophic state after such a conflict the way would be open for a world central bank and currency to "rebuild the financial system".


And, of course, we would need to microchip the people to protect them from the baddies.

Who benefits from 9/11?

Now what was the trigger for the 'war on terrorism'? What has been the foundation of the cover story for global conquest by what is nothing less than the Fourth Reich? Why, of course, it is the attacks of September 11th, which President Bush called "Our Pearl Harbour".


Welt well, well.


The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) document, produced a year before 9/11, says that their blueprint for conquest or their "process of transformation" was likely to be long and slow" absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor".


And what happened at just the right moment to advance their plans dramatically? 9/11.


The American Free Press asked Christopher Maletz, assistant director of the PNAC, what was meant by the need for" a new Pearl Harbor". He said they needed more money to increase the defense budget for new arms and future capabilities.

"Without some disaster or catastrophic event the politicians and the military we have not have approved this", Maletz said.36

Thanks to 9/11, Congress allocated $40 billion to fund the 'war ( on terrorism' and the 2002 military budget alone was,$348.7 billion with further massive rises to come.


This is exactly what the PNAC document called for and, because of 9/11 it is happening. Coincidence? Can a whale fit in a matchbox?


In truth, this is not an 'American' agenda for global conquest, that's just the cover to hide the fact that what we are seeing happen is the Illuminati agenda that I, and many others, have been exposing all these years.


The United States is just their vehicle, that's all. They couldn't care less about those who call themselves American any more 'than they could those in any other country. Neither is the Project for the New American Century report just the work of a few loony right-wing fanatics, as is claimed. It is a summary of part of the Illuminati agenda as it is planned to proceed over the next few years.


Look at the personnel of the PNAC and the network of connecting organizations.


They have become known as 'neo-cons'.


Donald Rumsfeld (PNAC founding member): Defense Secretary in the 'war on terrorism', who is ensuring that the blueprint produced by his own organization comes to pass.


Rumsfeld visited Baghdad in 1983 to arrange for the shipment of chemical and biological weapons Saddam Hussein from the Reagan-Bush administration and in 2000 he was on the board of the European engineering company, ABB, when it supplied nuclear technology to North Korea. This is yet another example of the secret agenda and the movie running alongside each other.


Rumsfeld was involved in supplying the 'problems' that the movie could later claim made action necessary against Iraq and North Korea.

Paul Wolfowitz (PNAC founding member): Deputy Defense Secretary, whom Bush calls "Wolfie". He is a far right supporter of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Jinsa) -  a "think-tank that puts Israel and its security at the heart of US foreign policy".37 Wolfowitz, who has relatives in Israel, has also served as the Bush administration's liaison to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and has extremely close ties to the government of Israel.


This is just the background you need to be seen as impartial on Middle East policy. Wolfowitz is the real power at the Pentagon, more so than Rumsfeld. Rarely is the person officially in charge the one who is really in control.



Dick Cheney (PNAC founding member): Vice President and on the board of advisors of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs Jinsa.


He was Defense Secretary to father George Bush during the 1991 Gulf War and he's the real power in the White House behind the village idiot. Cheney was head of the oil services giant, Halliburton, - from 1995 to 2000 when the company enjoyed contracts with Saddam Hussein's Iraq and worked with other terrorist dictatorships to line their pockets. Cheney is a very disturbed entity indeed (see my other books).

Lewis Libby (PNAC founding member): Chief of Staff to Cheney, close friend, confidant and protégé of Wolfowitz. He served in father George Bush's Defense Department and is closely connected with the Illuminati Rand Corporation, or companies, and the defense contractor, Northrop Grumman, which, like the Rand Corporation, enjoys massive contracts with the Pentagon.


Libby was a lawyer for convicted felon and Israeli spy Mark Rich, who was pardoned by Illuminati front man and crook, Bill Clinton, in his last days as president.



James Woolsey: another Jinsa member and former director of the CIA-from 1993-95, who was apparently lined up to become the minister of 'information' in the post-war Iraq. Can you imagine a CIA chief as minister for 'information'? Woolsey, a member of the US Policy Defense Board at the Pentagon, said he believes the United States is going to be involved for several decades in helping to "change the face" of the Middle East.38


He also said:

"We will make a lot of people very nervous and we will hear, for example, the Mubarak regime in Egypt or the Saudi royal family thinking about the idea of these Americans spreading of democracy in this part of the world. They will say you make us very nervous. Our response should be ... good." 39

Woolsey studied at Oxford University between 1963 and 1965 when he was awarded an Illuminati Rhodes Scholarship (just like Bill Clinton). See And The Truth Shall Set You Free for more on the Rhodes Scholar network.



John Bolton: served with the State Department, Justice Department and the government's international 'aid' agency, USAID, under father George Bush. He is now under-:secretary for arms control and international security in the State Department. Bolton is a major player in the policy on Iraq and was also one of Bush's chad-counters during the rigged election in Florida. He is a member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs Jinsa) and is a vice-president at the far-right American Enterprise Institute as well as being involved with the Project for the New American Century. Bolton is reported to think the 'war on terrorism' is World War Four and could take 40 years to finish.

Jeb Bush: brother of the brain cell and Governor of Florida during the election fraud that stopped Al Gore becoming president. The Bush family is corrupt to its core and fundamentally' connected into the Illuminati web as my other books have extensively detailed.

Zalmay Khalilzad: the Afghanistan-born American who was made special envoy to Afghanistan before the war that installed his fellow Unocal employee, Hamid Karsai, as leader. Khalilzad authored a book on Saddam with Wolfowitz called Overthrow Him and encouraged his close friend, George 'Illuminati' Shultz, the former Reagan-Bush Secretary of State, to use Iran to bring down Sad dam. Like Lewis Libby, he has worked for the Illuminati Rand Corporation and he also served under National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice, when she was a director of Chevron, a company that stands to benefit enormously from the conquest of Iraq and the pipelines across Afghanistan now that the Taliban have gone.


Khalilzad has close connections to both events. Once his job was done in Afghanistan, Khalilzad was appointed Bush's 'special envoy' to Iraq to playa similar role by installing a US puppet-government. He was a graduate student at the University of Chicago, an 'intellectual' centre for the American right wing. He became a special advisor to the State Department under Reagan-Bush when he was very much involved in the arming of the Mujahadeen fighting the Russian occupation and this included Osama bin Laden and what became al-Qaeda.


He later became undersecretary of defense to father George Bush and headed the .transition team for the Defense Department, advising Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after boy Bush was manipulated into power. He was then appointed to the National Security Council and reports to his old friend at Chevron, Condoleezza Rice.

Elliott Abrams: pleaded guilty on two counts of lying to Congress about the IranContra arms-for-drugs scandal, but was pardoned by father George Bush. Abrams tried to cover up the murder of hundreds of civilians at EI Mooted by an elite US trained military unit in EI Salvador. In 1993 a UN truth commission, which investigated 22,000 atrocities during the twelve-year El Salvador civil war, found that 85% of the abuses were the 'work of the Reagan-Bush-Abrams-supported rightwing military.


Condoleezza Rice appointed Abrams, as, get this, Senior Director for Democracy, Human Rights and International Operations at the National Security Council in 2001. A year later she made him Senior Director for Near East and North African Affairs, including Arab-Israel relations and American efforts to promote "peace and security" in the region.


Abrams is on the advisory board of the Media Research Center, an organization that opposes liberalism on television or in films.

John Negroponte: the Bush ambassador to the United Nations with a horrific history. He was a major aide to the US embassy in Vietnam from 1964, an advisor to the war criminal Henry Kissinger, and in charge of Vietnam policy on the US National Security Council. In the 1980s he carried out the covert policy of Reagan-Bush to destroy the elected Sandinista government in Nicaragua and in Honduras he administered a massive increase in US military support for the right-wing government. It soared from $4m to $77m and the country became known as USS Honduras.


Negroponte was also fundamentally involved with the infamous Battalion 3-16 in Honduras that ran a terror campaign of murder and torture against the people.



Richard Perle (PNAC founding member): former Assistant Defense Secretary to Reagan-Bush, a leading member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Jinsa) and the chairman of the far-right American Enterprise Institute (AEI) on 17th Street in Washington, which has Cheney's wife, Lynne, among its membership. Fourteen members of this AEI organization are in the Bush cabinet and others are elsewhere in the administration.


Bush told an AEI conference on February 26th, 2003:

"At the American Enterprise Institute some of the finest minds in our nation are at work in some of the greatest challenges to our nation. You do such good work that my administration has borrowed 20 such minds."41

Perle has so many of his associates in the Bush government that they are known as the "string of Perles".42


At the Pentagon, Perle was nicknamed the "Prince of Darkness" for his hard beliefs and he introduced a number of staunchly pro-Israel activists who dramatically increased weapons sales to Israel. He is a former employee of an Israeli weapons manufacturer, Soltam. Perle is a member of several other - wing groups like the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (along with James Woolsey, the former CIA chief and member of the Project for the New American Century), and he is referred to as the "neo-cons political godfather".


Perle is a former aide to one-time Israeli premier, Benjamin Netanyahu, and in 1996 he simultaneously advised both the Bob Dole campaign in the United States and the Netanyahu campaign in Israel. Perle was also advisor to the lobbying firm run by Douglas J. Feith, the Pentagon's under-secretary of defense. Before the invasion of Iraq, Perle advised clients of the investment house, Goldman Sachs, about investment opportunities in Iraq when the US was in control. He is a director of the software company, Autonomy Corp, which includes the Pentagon among its clients.


Autonomy says it expected its profits to increase dramatically after the war. Perle is a member of the Defense Policy Board that advises the Pentagon. Another member is Henry Kissinger, a major Illuminati operative of the last 40 years. Perle had to resign as chairman of the Board when conflicts of-interest were exposed.


My god, how many?


He resigned after it was reported he had worked as s consultant to the bankrupt telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd., which was trying to get Pentagon approval to be sold to Asian investors. The Los Angeles Times revealed that Perle briefed an investment seminar on ways to profit from the conflict in Iraq and North Korea just weeks after he received a top-secret government briefing on the two countries.44


The Defense Intelligence Agency briefing that Perle attended took place in February 2003, the Times reported, and he held his seminar three weeks later. The Times further cited agendas of the meetings· and other documents to show that Perle and fellow advisers received a classified address about military communications systems.


Perle runs Trireme Partners, a venture capital firm that has been exploring such high-tech investments.45

"The guiding principle here is that you do not give advice in the Defense Policy Board on any particular matter in Which you have an interest", Perle said. "And I don't do that. I haven't done that." 46

I think old Rich has another guiding principle, myself, although principle is not the word that comes immediately to mind.


Perle told the BBC:

"The President of the United States on issue after issue has reflected the views of neo-conservatives. I think he comes to his view in his own way and through his own experience, but it happens to track very closely with the outlook of neoconservatives, especially since 9/11."47

Firstly, Bush doesn't have any experience, nor a mind that could assimilate it; and second, the 'neocons' manipulated Bush into the presidency to front their agenda and he does whatever they tell him.



Michael Ledeen: Wow. Another member of the American Enterprise Institute and involved in the 1970s in the "shadowy world of right-wing Italian politics".48


Ledeen has close ties to Henry Kissinger, the Illuminati 'Roman Catholic' front, Opus Dei, and the Italian P-2 Masonic Lodge involving his associate, Licio Gelli, a far, far, right Illuminati operator (see And The Truth Shall Set You Free).49


As I mentioned earlier, Gelli, a Mussolini fascist and Knight of Malta, was the Grand Master of P-2. It was involved in the murder of the Italian politician, Aldo Moro, and other terrorist outrages by the so-called Red Brigade. P-2 and Gelli -  were behind the Vatican banking scandal featuring "God's Banker" Roberto Calvi who was silenced by being ritually murdered under Blackfriars Bridge at the entrance to the City of London (And the Truth Shall Set You Free has the background).


Francesco Pazienza, who is also reported to be close to Michael Ledeen ,so was suspected of setting up Calvi for murder and at the time of his death Calvi's family said he was killed by Opus Dei. Gelli and Pazienza, both associates of Ledeen, were jailed for their crimes, but not before Gelli was invited to the inauguration ceremony for President Ronald Reagan, the puppet for father George Bush, in 1981. Gelli and P-2 were closely connected with the Priory of Sion, the secret society going back with the Knights Templar to the 12th century and dedicated to the advancement of the Merovingian (big-time Illuminati) bloodline (see The Biggest Secret).


When the Italian authorities raided Gelli's Roman villa in 1991, they found files listing members of affiliated secret societies that formed a “cabal within a cabal”. These included Opus Dei with its thousands of initiates worldwide and the membership lists of the Knights Templar. Among the P-2 members was the current Prime Minister of Italy, Silvio Berlusconi.


Surprised? No, nor me.


This is the real background to those now controlling the American and British governments on the 'war on terrorism'. Michael Ledeen also had secret meetings with the Israeli government in the 1980s that led, "inadvertently" he says, to the Iran-Contra guns for drugs affair coordinated through the Reagan-Bush White House.51 Now, since 9/11, as the BBC reported, Ledeen's "shadowy neo-con talents are back in favor".52


In 2001, Ledeen was co-chair of the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. This is significant given the neo-Nazi plan for a conflict with China.


Ledeen says:

"All the great scholars who have studied the American character have come to the conclusion that we are a war-like people. We love war." 53

He talks of the need to "free" Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Libya and North Korea after the invasion of Iraq.

"No-one would have imagined that the United States could, and maybe should, consider France and Germany as strategic enemies", he said, "and yet they have behaved now for several months as if they are strategic enemies."

Ledeen, who has a model of Darth Vader on his desk, naturally says he is a student of the arch manipulator Machiavelli and his attitude was encapsulated by this remark:

"Richard [Perle] says he doesn't think Americans are vindictive. Well I hope he's wrong." 55

Jim Lobe of the Inter Press Service in Washington has been compiling files on the 'neo-cons' since the 1970s when he realized how influential they could be.


He says of Michael Ledeen:

"People were very surprised to see that of the [very few] people who Karl Rove, Bush's closest advisor, ... talks to ... that are knowledgeable in foreign affairs ... one of them is Michael Ledeen and that will be a cause for sleepless nights for many people I would think. He is a provocateur and he's written more than once that the thing he really dislikes about the foreign policy establishment is that it thinks in terms of stability rather than revolution and radical change. " 56

As Ledeen told the UK Daily Telegraph:

"Undermining the governments of other countries? No big deal."


Douglas J. Feith: under-secretary for policy at the Pentagon, who selects the. members of the Defense Policy Board. He is on the board of advisers of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs Jinsa) and was a lawyer to defense contractors, Northrop Grumman. Feith was given an award by the Zionist Organization of America, citing him as a "pro-Israel activist".58


He is a, representative of an "Israeli armaments manufacturer", Dov Zakheim.59 I saw him interviewed on British television as I was completing this book and it seemed to me that he had undergone a charisma by-pass. Michael Joyce: the former president of the massively influential Bradley Foundation that created The Project for a New American Century.


It has also provided millions in funding for the PNAC, the American Enterprise Institute and a long list of other neo-~on organizations and authors. One such writer claimed that poverty was due to the genetic traits of a sub class of human beings - classic Illuminati racism. Joyce is a close associate of the pedophile William Bennett, the Education Secretary to Ronald Reagan, and the pedophile father George Bush.


Bennett was rumored to be involved in the education system in Iraq after the war. God help the kids, then. Joyce claims to be a "moral guardian" of American family values and he is an advisor to Americans for Victory over Terrorism, a group that wants to prevent criticism of American military policy.


A fellow advisor is James Woolsey, the former head of the CIA, who was reported to be in line to be the minister of 'information' in the post-war Iraq.



Meyrav Wurmser: a neo-Conservative "writer" with the Illuminati Hudson Institute, who monitors the Arab Press for "anti-Semitic" remarks.


Her husband, David, is an advisor at the State Department and both are with the far right-wing, give-war-a-chance, American Enterprise Institute.



Joshua Muravchik: a member of the American Enterprise Institute who has no problem with a devastating war on the Korean peninsular, so long as, like the rest of these sad people, they don't have to take part themselves.


Muravchik told the BBC that removing the "nuclear threat" of North Korea,

" ... might include having to try to destroy it by military strikes." He said such a war would be "far worse than in Iraq, it'd be a war in which thousands arid thousands of Koreans would die and maybe thousands of Americans as well".

But who gives a shit, Josh; you won't be there will you?



David Frum: wrote Bush's "axis of evil" speech that targeted Iraq, Iran and North Korea. He is a 'scholar' at the American Enterprise Institute. From was a Bush speech-writer for two years from 2001. He wrote a sycophantic book about Bush called The Right Man that was hailed on all the television networks a "controversial".


He would then appear and tell the viewers what a wonderful president Bush was. From said on the eve of the Iraqi slaughter:

"I pray for the success of American army" 61

Oh, I'm sure the gods will oblige.



William Kristol: former chief of staff to Dan Quayle, the vice president to father Bush, and was known as "Quayle's brain". Not much to do there, then. He organized the formation of the Project for the New American Century, of which he is chairman, on behalf of the Bradley Foundation. With this background, no wonder he is a political 'pundit' on Murdoch's Fox/Fix News.


He is chairman of the New Citizenship Project that connects with the Project for the New American Century. It claims to be a non-profit, "educational" organization promoting American global leadership.


Kristol told the BBC:

"American power should not just be used in defense of American interests, but for the promotion of American principles ... we are going to have to bring down a series of regimes who are sponsors of a network of various terrorist organizations." 62

He names them as Iran, Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and North Korea was this not a tyranny to expand the control of America?

"No", said Kristol, "lli1J about freedom and democracy, not about capitalism." "No", said Icke, it is about global conquest for the Hidden Hand. Kristol, like Perle, says that their ideological poodle in London, Tony Blair, is a "kind of neo-conservative". 63

Kind of??


Kristol said the mass killing in Iraq was "the end of the beginning of this part of the war, it is not the end of the end".64


They would give Iraq a new government "and then really work to remove other dictators with weapons of mass destruction". The neo-cons - neo-Nazis - say that democracies (tyrannies in which you can cast a meaningless vote) don't harbor international terrorists. But what about the White House and Downing Street for a start?


Kristol runs the Rupert Murdoch-financed Weekly Standard in Washington, five floors below the American Enterprise Institute. The publication slavishly supports the Bush and Israel line. A regular contributor to the paper is John Bolton, the Iraq war manipulator, who loves to attack UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.


Others include Perle, Wolfowitz, Feith and Woolsey.


In 1998, it was Kristol, Bolton, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Khalilzad, Bennett, Woolsey, Perle and current Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage, who signed a letter calling on President Bill Clinton to instigate military action in Iraq.66 What a bunch these are and they are "running our world on behalf of forces we never see." Kristol is very close to Vice President Cheney and is at the heart of the agenda with regard to the Bush government. In that case it doesn't look good either for Saudi Arabia or Egypt.


Reporting an interview with Kristol, the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, said:

"... his opinion is that it is impossible to let Saudi Arabia just continue what\ it is doing. It is impossible to accept the anti-Americanism it is disseminating. The fanatic Wahhabism that Saudi Arabia engenders is undermining the stability of the entire region. It's the same with Egypt, he says: we mustn't accept the status quo there. For Egypt, too, the horizon has to be liberal democracy." 67

Richard Perle, one of Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's closest advisers and a vocal advocate of war against Iraq, has also publicly questioned the "reliability" (we intend to invade) of long-time US ally, Saudi Arabia.68


As I said in Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster, Saudi Arabia has long been a puppet state of the US, but I felt there were plans to move in eventually and take complete control, as with Iraq. While I was writing this chapter, the United States announced it was withdrawing most of its troops from Saudi Arabia.


You can bet this is part of a strategy that will include the demonization of Saudi Arabia and the return of the troops to take over the country and its oil. As per usual, terrorist bombs exploded in Saudi Arabia killing many people just before Colin Powell was due to arrive, providing the backdrop of devastation that he could exploit with his 'war on terror' propaganda.


In the predictable style of manipulators, William Kristol seeks to present everything as black and white. You are either with us or for the terrorists, and so on. He told Haaretz that the choice was between "extremist Islam, secular fascism or democracy", and because of September 11th he said, "Americans understood that".


No, America has been told that over and over by people like Kristol since those planes struck the twin towers.

"America is in a position where it has no choice", Kristol ludicrously said. "It is obliged to be far more aggressive in promoting democracy, hence this war."

For "democracy" read "American control".


He claimed that this policy was based on the new American understanding that if the United States does not shape the world in its image, the world will shape the United States in its own image.


Once again we see that the whole foundation for the justification of this fascist expansionism of the Fourth Reich is believing the official story of the attacks that happened on September 11th to be true. But it is not; the official story is a lie. Who told us what happened, who did it, how they did it, and why?


The same forces that are using their false version of the story to follow their long-planned agenda for global conquest.


Charles Krauthammer, a columnist for the Washington Post, Time, and Kristol's Weekly Standard, is close to the Project for the New American Century and he took the same line in his interview with Haaretz:

" ... the sea-change ... took place here on September 11, 2001. Since that morning, Americans have understood that if they don't act now. and if weapons of mass destruction reach extremist terrorist organizations, millions of Americans will die. Therefore, because they understand that those others want to kill them by the millions, the Americans prefer to take to the field of battle and fight, rather than sit idly by and die at home." 69

The familiar technique of frightening the people into acquiescence is all based on the acceptance that the official story of 9 /11 is what really happened. The situation is presented as open and shut, black and white, no middle ground, no room for debate. As always, there is the "Americans have understood", "Americans know", when the truth is that is simply what people like Krauthammer, Kristol, Murdoch, Perle, Rumsfeld, Powell, Cheney and Bush have told them.


The New York Times columnist, Thomas Friedman, said:

"Is the Iraq war the great neoconservative war? It's "the war the neoconservatives wanted." It's the war the neoconservatives marketed. Those people had an idea to sell when September 11th came, and they sold it. Oh boy, did they sell it. So this is not a war that the masses demanded. This is a war of an elite. I could give you the names of 25 people (all of whom are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office) who, if you had exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not have happened."70

Khalid Saffuri of the Islamic Institute said of the nee-con cabal:

"They are a disaster for this country and many members of Congress believe that, but they don't dare say it. They'll take on everyone, it's like a gang, you know, it's like a Mafia." 71

Syria's deputy US ambassador, Imad Moustapha said:

"Sometimes they are really terrifying in way they think, the way they would like to shape the world, the way they can impose their doctrine on everyone else, even if force is needed." 72

Moustapha said he was not worried about them implementing their policies because of Syria’s friends and allies. Oh, Imad. Look again, mate. A former US ambassador and White House aide said:

"This bunch of interlopers who've latched on to George are stark, staring bonkers. Their policies are insane." 73

And Arthur Schlesinger, the historian and former special assistant to President Kennedy, also referred to them as "lunatics":

"They lack any decent respect for the opinions of the rest of mankind; and cast themselves as the world's jury, judge and executioner in deciding which country to attack, which people to bomb." 74


1 "USA: Unocal Advisor Named Representative to Afghanistan-. World Socialist Web Site, January 3rd 2002

2 Ted Rail, author of To Afghanistan and Back, recounting his experiences covering the Afghan war,

3 "Berating the Generals, The Siege of Washington", by Wayne Madsen, a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist. GounterPunch, March 31st 2003,
4 "The Next World Order, The Bush Administration may have a brand-new doctrine of power', New Yorker, April 1st 2002
6 "Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President". by Neil Mackay. Sunday Herald,
7 Ibid
8 "I asked my intelligence source why Blair misled us allover Saddam's WMD, His response? One word ... Campbell", by Andrew Gilligan, Mail on Sunday, June 1st 2003
9 BBG News Online, July 6th 2003

11 "I asked my intelligence source why Blair misled us allover Saddam's WMD, His response? One word .. , Campbell", by Andrew Gilligan, Mail on Sunday. June 1st 2003

12 Ibid

13 Sunday Telegraph, June 1st 2003

14 "Short Blasts The Secret War Deal", Daily Mall, June 2nd 2003, p 6

15 Ibid

16 Adolf Hitler, Mein KampfiHoughton Mifflin Company published an edition in 1999)


18 "CIA Investigator Debunks, Niger Uranium Sales To Iraq', Rense,com, July 6th 2003, urn. htm

19 CNN March 15th 2003

20 "No evidence of plan to use banned weapons In war", by George Edmonson in Washington Sydney Morning Herald, May 9th 2003

21 The Guardian, April 16th 2003

22 WMD emphasis was 'bureaucratic', May 29th 2003

23 April 22nd 2003

24 "US Should Be 'Embarrassed' Over Failure to Find WMDs: Ex-Spies", Agence France Presse, April 18th 2003

25 "Wayne Madsen - Berating the Generals, The Siege of Washington", CounterPunch, March 31st 2003,

26 Ibid

27 Ibid

28 Ibid

29 Joseph A. Schumpeter. The Sociology of Imperialism, 1918

30 "Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President", by Neil Mackay, Sunday Herald,

31 Ibid

32 Ibid

33 http://www. pdf

34 "Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President", by Neil Mackay, Sunday Herald,

35 The Biggest Secret. Bridge of Love Publications. 1998

36 "America Pearl Harbored", American Free Press, 12_24_02/ America_Pearl_Harbored/ america_pearl_harbored.html

37 "Carving Up The New Iraq", by Neil Mackay, Sunday Herald. Scotland,

38 Panorama, BBCl, May 18th 2003

39 Ibid

40 This background was published in an investigation headed Carving Up The New Iraq, by Neil Mackay. Sunday Herald, Scotland,

41 Panorama, BBC1, May 18th 2003

42 "An American Odyssey, Part One", by Graham Turner, Daily Telegraph, June 16th 2003, pp 13-15

43 Panorama, BBC1, May 18th 2003

44 "Report: Pentagon consultant using connections for private investing", Associated Press, May 7th 2003

45 Ibid

46 Ibid

47 Panorama. May 18th, BBC-1

48 Panorama, BBC1, May 18th, 2003

49 "Good Americans", by John Judge, December 17th, 2002, http:// mke. _id=1609

50 Ibid

51 Panorama. BBC1, May 18th, 2003

52 Ibid

53 Ibid

54 Ibid

55 Ibid

56 Ibid

57 "An American Odyssey". Part One. by Graham Turner. Daily Telegraph. Jure' e 16:h 2003. JJ 13-1511
58 "The Weird Men Behind George W. Bush's War". by 1'v1lchael lind. New Statt;r'sman. Londor;. April 12th 2003

59 "A strange case of Jared Israel". by Israel Shamir. October 3rd 2002. ~ strange.shtm 

60 Panorama, BBC-1, May 18th 2003

61 Ibid

62 Ibid

63 Ibid

64 Ibid

65 Ibid

66 "Carving Up The New Iraq". by Neil Mackay. Sunday Herald. Scotland.

67 "White Man's Burden", by Ari Shavit. Haaretz ne,~spaper hasen/ pages /ShArt.jhtml?item No=2802 79&contrass I D=2&subContrassl D= 14&sbSu b ContrassID=O&listSrc= Y

68 "Report: Pentagon consultant using connections 'or private Investing". 4ssoCiated Press. May 7th 2003

69 "White Man's Burden". by Ari Shavit. Haaretz nevvspaper hasen/ pages /ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=2802 79&contrassl D=2&subContrassl D= 14&sbSub ContrassID=O&listSrc=Y
70 Ibid

71 Panorama. BBC-l May 18th, 2003

72 Ibid

73 "An American Odyssey, Part One'. by Graham Turner. Daily Telegraph. June 16th 2003. pp 13-15

74 Ibid

Back to Contents


Back to Germany's ET Contacts?