chapter 11
the debt scam

It is impossible to understand the global conspiracy unless we appreciate the background to the world money system.


This is not taught in the schools and no smart-suited economist or correspondent on the television news will tell you the truth, either. Some of them don’t know what is going on because they have been programmed to believe nonsense by the education system, while others simply don’t want you to know. The foundations of the manipulation toward a world government, army, bank and currency are built on the fantastic con trick we call the banking system. Once people understand the way this works, it is easy to see how a few can control the lives of everyone else. It is worth repeating and expanding here on what I said in Chapter 3.

The banks are given the power to ‘create’ money, by which they mean ‘creating’ non-existent money known as credit. This costs them nothing, but the moment this credit is brought into theoretical existence the banks can start to charge interest on it. This is the system that controls everyone’s life. But it goes further than that. When you take out a loan, the bank ‘creates’ credit for the size of the loan, say £20,000. If only in theory, that is ‘new’ money. But you are not going to pay back only £20,000, because you have to pay interest on that loan. The interest has not been ‘created’ by the bank, but it still has to be found from somewhere. So where? From the wealth and credit already circulating in the world.

In this way, since this crazy banking system began, the real wealth of the planet has been sucked into the banking system as the interest paid on every loan to every person, business, and government. This has allowed them to lend even more nonexistent money on the back of that and get the world even deeper in debt. The wealth and credit-loaning capacity they have accumulated is beyond comprehension, far more than that of the United States, the richest country in the world. In fact, they own the United States, as they own almost every other country in the world. The bankers have used this wealth and credit mountain to buy and control the global oil companies, multinationals of every kind, the media, the armament companies, the drug companies, the politicians, the political ‘advisors’, and virtually everything else they need to control the world.


The same few people and families own the lot! They hide this truth behind the front organizations, the nexus of companies, and the puppet directors, and they are supported in their desire for secrecy by the pathetic media and the education system. The Rockefellers and Rothschilds alone control a fantastic network of banks, oil companies, multinational corporations, airlines, and scores of other organizations. The Rockefeller/Rothschild Chase Manhattan Bank has enough power by itself to stimulate a global financial panic. In 1995 the Chase merged with Chemical Bank which had already absorbed Manufacturers Hanover. The concentration of power is incredible. But the true controllers of these empires are hidden from public view by frontmen, trusts, foundations, and companies.


The Rockefellers’ ability to hide the extent of their power is phenomenal. But with the Rothschilds it borders on genius. Particularly since the second World War, they have sought to promote an image of a declining power operating outside of the big league. Nonsense. They are the big league along with other elements of the Global Elite.

According to the New World Order researcher, Eustace Mullins,1 the Rothschilds use the code ‘City’ and ‘First City’ in North America to indicate banks under their influence from the City of London. He says these include First City Properties, First City Financial Corporation of Vancouver, First City Trust of Edmonton, and First City Development Ltd, which are all headed by Samuel Belzberg. Much of the coordination is communicated through Rothschild Inc., of Rockefeller Plaza, New York, according to Mullins.


The Rothschilds also operate through a Canadian company known as PowerCorp which in turn connects with the Hollinger Group, the Canadian publishing empire owned by the elite Bilderberger, Conrad Black. The Hollinger Group controls a stream of publications worldwide, including the London-based Telegraph newspapers, and its international advisors are Henry Kissinger and Lord Carrington, chairman of the Bilderberg Group, former British cabinet minister, and a cousin of the Rothschild family. (These two formed their own company, Kissinger Associates.)


This covert interlinking of power in banking, politics, and the media allows the same few individuals to promote the same policy through a host of apparently unconnected institutions and organizations. By controlling the creation of credit, the bankers can cause booms and busts, nationally and internationally, whenever they wish to further their ambitions. An economic depression is not caused by a collapse in the demand for goods and services.


People do not decide that they no longer want jobs done or articles produced. An economic depression is caused when there are not enough pieces of paper and electronic ‘money’ in circulation to pay for those goods and services. And who controls the amount of money-credit in circulation? The banks. If they want to cause a depression for ulterior motives, as in pre-war Germany and the US, they take measures which reduce the amount of money in circulation. They reduce the number of loans they make and raise interest rates.

This also reaps a colossal reward for the major (Global Elite) banks.


People still have to pay the interest on loans taken out before the manufactured economic collapse and if they default, the banks take their property and increase by hundreds of thousands the number of farms, businesses, and homes they own. And with every payment of interest by those who continue to pay their loans during a depression, more money is being taken out of circulation and not recycled back into the economy, thus increasing the depression.

This process of reducing the money in circulation and causing a depression can be seen all the time. The economists and their poodles, the politicians and economic correspondents, call all this part of the ‘economic cycle’. Baloney. In the 1930s that terrible depression, in which men, women, and children starved in a world of plenty, was caused by the banks withdrawing money from circulation by refusing loans. It wasn’t that people didn’t want to eat; they simply could not afford to buy the food because money had been artificially taken out of circulation. I will leave it to an ‘insider’ to sum up the situation I have described.


Robert H. Hemphill, a credit manager at the Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta, said:

“This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous, if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system.


When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse, unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon.” 2

There was no money, people were told, to build houses and feed the population.


But suddenly, when it was time for the Global Elite’s war, the money available to finance Hitler, Japan, and the war effort in the United States and Great Britain was limitless. People often say that there always seems to be money available to fight wars. Of course there is, because the bankers who control the world economic system want those wars. They do not want people well-housed with full bellies and a proper education because then they would be much harder to control. It was not the much-hyped ‘New Deal’ policies of Franklin Roosevelt which ended the 30s depression, it was the banks putting money back into circulation to finance the war they were creating. Here is a reality of life on Earth.


There is no need for anyone to be cold, hungry, homeless or in poverty. All these things are caused by the lack of pieces of paper and electronic numbers called money circulating in the world and by the charging of interest on them. We could change that today if the desire was there.


The world financial system and policies of boom and bust are controlled by just thirteen people - the members of the International Banking Commission in Geneva, Switzerland, which was set up by David Rockefeller on behalf of the Elite in 1972. The Commission is made up of two members each from the US Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the central banks of Germany, France and Switzerland, and one member each from the Netherlands, Austria and Scandinavia. It has its own intelligence agency known as Four-I, the International Intelligence Information Institute. This banking Elite is controlled by families like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers (Rockenfelders), Bilts and Goldbergs.


Connecting with the Commission is the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), also in Switzerland, the country at the centre of the Elite financial network.


The BIS helps to coordinate the policies of the Figure 13 national central banks, like the United States Federal Reserve, the private banking cartel which decides the economic and interest rate policies of the United States, no matter what the puppet presidents and politicians think about it (Figure 13).


Figure 13


The ‘Fed’ does not have board membership of the BIS, but it is the coordination that goes on unofficially that matters.


The Federal Reserve sends representatives to all its meetings and subscribes to the shares of the BIS.3 Most people in America don’t even realize the Federal Reserve is a private organization. They think (a) the government would not be stupid or corrupt enough to allow a private banking cartel to run the country (wrong!) or (b) that the word ‘Federal’ means that it must be part of the government (equally wrong).

The term Federal is used for many Elite organizations in the US to give the illusion of government ownership. In the United Kingdom, we are sold the illusion that the Bank of England is nationalized and therefore under the control of the government. The Bank of England is one of the focal points of the Elite financial network. It was controlled by the Rothschild Empire when it was an officially private bank, and it has continued to be controlled by the Global Elite since it was nationalized by the post-war Labour Government and it became an unofficial private bank.

The first move by the new Labour Party Chancellor Gordon Brown (Bil) after taking office in May 1997, was to allow the Bank of England to set interest rates like the Federal Reserve, a move he had hinted at two years earlier.4 Within days of taking office he did precisely that. Eddie George, the Bank of England Governor, is a former executive of both the Elite-controlled Bank of International Settlements and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The whole house of cards, and the control of the human race, is based on the charging of interest on money. The subject of interest is crucial. There is nothing wrong with money if it is used only as a measure of exchange for goods and services. It is when you can charge interest on money, most of which doesn’t physically exist, that enormous dangers arise. You can then make more money from manipulating pieces of paper and electronic numbers than you can from producing essential goods and services for people who need them. With the charging of interest, the money chases those who already have money and ignores those who have not.


The cataclysmic social and financial divisions in the world are caused by the charging of interest on money. Production is geared to greed, not need, and the rich get richer and the poor, poorer. Often it is not the cost of a house that prevents people from buying a home, it is because we have to buy three or four for the right to live in one!

A mortgage leaflet put out by the National Westminster Bank tells me that if I take out a loan of £50,000, I will actually pay them back £152,000, the price of three houses to buy one. And on the front of the leaflet they have the nerve to claim: “The National Westminster Bank. We’re here to make life easier”. Imagine the transformation that would occur if people only had to repay the capital (with no interest) on their house over a period of 25 to 30 years. The cost of a mortgage and a basic human right (a home) would plummet immediately by two-thirds. The builders would still get paid because they are paid from the capital price. The suppliers of the materials would still get paid for the same reason.


The only person who would not make the killing of today would be the banker who currently makes a fortune from every house purchase. Builders go out of business and people sleep in the streets to allow a few bankers to grow fatter and richer, and ever more powerful. There is no reason whatsoever why a government cannot print its money interest-free and lend it interest-free to the people to buy a home, with perhaps a small one-time charge to cover administration costs.


The only thing stopping this is the lack of will to do so by politicians of all parties controlled directly by the Elite or by its economic manipulation. Look at how taxation could be reduced dramatically, or even removed, if our governments - the people, in other words - were not paying back phenomenal sums in interest on money ‘borrowed’ from the banks. A friend in the financial business reckons that for every pound or dollar that exists as cash, another 30 million exists (or rather doesn’t!) as electronic “credit”.


Pastor Sheldon Emery described this system of government debt-creation very well in his book, Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People:

“The Federal Government, having spent more than it has taken from its citizens in taxes, needs, for the sake of illustration, $1 billion. Since it does not have the money, Congress has given away its authority to ‘create’ it, the Government must go to the ‘creators’ for the $1 billion. But the Federal Reserve, a private corporation, doesn’t just give it away!


The bankers are willing to deliver $1 billion in money or credit to the Federal Government in exchange for the Government’s agreement to pay it back - with interest! So Congress authorizes the Treasury Department to print $1 billion in US Bonds, which are then delivered to the Federal Reserve Bankers.


The Federal Reserve then pays the cost of printing the $1 billion (about $1,000) and makes the exchange. The Government then uses the money to pay its obligations. What are the results of this fantastic transaction? Well, $1 billion in Government bills are paid all right, but the Government has now indebted the people to the bankers for $1 billion on which the people must pay interest!


Tens of thousands of such transactions have taken place since 1913 [when the Federal Reserve was created] so that by the 1980s, the US Government is indebted to the bankers for over $1 trillion on which the people pay over $100 billion a year in interest alone with no hope of ever paying off the principal. [It is far more today]. Supposedly our children and following generations will pay forever and forever! “

You say, “This is terrible!”


Yes, it is, but we have shown only part of the sordid story. Under this unholy system, those United States Bonds have now become ‘assets’ of the banks in the Reserve System which they then use as ‘reserves’ to ‘create’ more ‘credit’ to lend. Current ‘reserve’ requirements allow them to use that $1 billion in bonds to ‘create’ as much as $15 billion in new ‘credit’ to lend to States, Municipalities, to individuals and businesses.


Added to the original $1 billion, they could have $16 billion of ‘created credit’ out in loans paying them interest with their only cost being $1,000 for printing the original $1 billion! Since the US Congress has not issued Constitutional money since 1863, in order for the people to have money to carry on trade and commerce they are forced to borrow the ‘created credit’ of the Monopoly Bankers and pay them usury-interest!”5 The term ‘constitutional money’ is a reference to the United States Constitution, which says, “Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.”


Unfortunately, either by accident or design, it does not say that Congress shall always coin money and regulate the value thereof, and that no-one else will ever do so. The consequences of this have been quite dreadful for America and the world: in 1910, the Federal debt was only $1 billion, or $12.40 per person. State and local debts were very small or non-existent; by 1920, just seven years after the Federal Reserve was launched, the US Government debt was $24 billion, $228 for every citizen; in 1960, the national debt was $284 billion or $1,575 per head; by 1981, the debt passed $1 trillion and has gone on soaring ever since. If the whole of the United States were handed to the bankers to pay back the debts, they would still be owed another two, maybe three Americas! 6


It was not without reason that Thomas Jefferson, one of the founding fathers, said:

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks, and the corporations that will grow up around ...[the banks]..., will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”7

In the United Kingdom, the government was paying £1 billion a year in interest on borrowing after the end of the 1960s.


By 1993 it had soared to £24.5 billion. The government has borrowed to pay interest on previous loans while the capital has remained unrepaid. Contrast that £24.5 billion in interest payments with the £33 billion spent on health that year and the £11 billion awarded to education.8 Don’t complain about a lack of school books or crumbling buildings. The bankers have got to eat, you know.

The creation of debt through interest charges also sets up the structure through which the takeover of the world by the few becomes possible. The bankers can accumulate and manipulate businesses by accepting, or refusing, loans. One regular takeover scenario is for the Elite bankers, in concert, to deny loans to a target business or multinational corporation. This depresses its value on the stock exchanges. At this point, with the price of the stock falling, the bankers buy large blocks of shares at bargain prices.


The bankers then have a sudden change of heart and approve the loan, thus increasing the company’s share value. The banks either sell the shares and make a handsome profit or they retain their increased control in the boardroom. When the banks gain control, what do they do? They ensure that the company borrows more and more from the banks until they are so much in debt that the banks own everything.

It is in this way that the same few people have come to own all the major businesses, the media, and so on. Once they owned the media, of course, it became easy to keep the truth from the people and feed us the lies that are necessary to mislead and confuse us. If you are a journalist or a bank employee, go and find a mirror and ask it some questions. Your children are going to face the consequences of the New World Order like everyone else’s, unless you wake up. Nothing would improve the lives of people quicker than an end to the charging of interest on money and for governments to print their own money, interest free, or to make the banks pay interest to the government.


President Abraham Lincoln began to do this with his so called ‘greenbacks’. He was murdered soon afterwards by John Wilkes Booth, an alleged agent of the House of Rothschild, in 1865. President John F. Kennedy proposed to do it and some of his interest-free notes are still in circulation.

He was murdered by the Elite in Dallas, Texas, in 1963.

Another money confidence trick is that of inflation. We are told that inflation is caused by too much money in circulation chasing too few goods. This is used to justify the removal of money from circulation, which leads to an economic ‘depression’. This was a ruse used by the Volcker-Reagan-Thatcher trio in the early 1980s when the ‘in’ phrase was “squeezing inflation out of the system”. How can inflation be caused by too much money chasing too few goods when in any boom or depression the shops are full of goods on the shelves left unsold?


And if more goods are being sold and production is increased, why don’t the so called economies of scale bring prices down? Greed is part of this, for sure, but there are actually too many goods chasing too little money in circulation. Interest on money massively inflates prices and it does so while ensuring that there is too little money to spend on goods.

Each time a bank creates a loan, it is creating more debt than the amount of the loan itself. Take the example of the £50,000 loan from the National Westminster Bank I mentioned earlier. The loan is worth £50,000, but the debt created at the same time is £102,000. To pay this back, the borrower has to find more money - double, in this case - than he has borrowed. The only way he can do this is to earn money that someone else has borrowed into existence. The debt of people and government explodes in this way, but there is still a scarcity of money to spend on goods because so much of the money in circulation is spent on servicing debt.


We are told in these circumstances that the supply of money in circulation must be reduced because prices are being inflated by too much money in the system. The main reason prices go up is because they are reflecting the amount of debt that has to be serviced. The more debt, the higher the prices throughout the system from material suppliers to transportation to advertising to shops. The cumulative effect of all this debt is reflected in the price of a product on the shelf.


Whenever you buy anything, from a loaf of bread to a Rolls Royce, you are paying back someone else’s debt to the banks. How do the economic ‘experts’ react to higher prices caused by the need to service debt? They raise interest rates to discourage more borrowing and reduce the amount of money in circulation. And what effect does that have? It creates more debt among those people already servicing loans and ensures that there is even less money to spend on goods.


Whichever situation you have, there is never too much money chasing too few goods, except among certain products and commodities from time to time due to a host of other factors, including greed. Generally it is always the other way round, too little money for too many goods. The only difference in this situation during a boom or bust is that of degree.


The end of charging interest on money will lower prices and transform the lives of everyone on the planet.


So what are we waiting for?



The Gold Mountain

One point to emphasize is the extent of the wealth accumulated by the Elite through the debt-interest system, and by stealing the world’s gold. A contact who has studied and worked within the global financial system, says that gold stolen by the Elite, from Russia after the war and from Japan, the USA and other sources, totals some $60 trillion.


This, he says, is held at the Clouten precious metals depository near Zurich, and similar depositories at Umbrea near Geneva, in Vienna and at the Rhein - the main airbase in Frankfurt. During the war, the Elite gold was stored at the US military base at Melinom near Jakarta, Indonesia, where it was guarded by 20,000 troops.


My contact has paperwork to prove many of these claims.



The Money Police

After the Second World War, with the nations of Europe devastated by conflict and debt to the Elite’s bankers, the next stage in the global domination of money and credit was installed through groupings like the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).


The World Bank, IMF, and GATT were all agreed upon by British and American negotiators at a conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, in 1944. Most influential in these agreements were the economist, Lord Keynes, from Britain, and the US Treasury Secretary, Harry Dexter White (CFR), who, with Alger Hiss, the secretary general at the launch of the United Nations, would later be exposed as communist spies.


The technical secretary at Bretton Woods was Virginius Frank Coe, an official of the US Treasury. He was appointed secretary of the new IMF until it was revealed in 1952 during congressional testimony that he was also a member of Dexter White’s communist ring! These were the guys who created the IMF, World Bank, and GATT.

The role of the World Bank (not to be confused with a world central bank) is to make loans to governments for large capital projects. These have been used, as intended, to finance projects in poor countries designed to meet the needs of the multinationals. These include policies forcing people from the land, thus destroying self-sufficient lifestyles and creating dependency on the Elite’s global economy. Much of the destruction of the rainforests has been done with loans from the World Bank, which, as we have seen, is always headed by appointees from the CFR, TC, Bil, establishment, and has eugenics as a key pillar of its policy. This subsidized environmental destruction has another plus for the Elite. It helps them to justify world control by the need to ‘save the planet’.

A role of the World Bank and other global economic ‘agencies’ is to make a fortune for the multinational construction companies like the Bechtel Group. This is normally done by making loans to Third World countries for mega construction projects which are irrelevant, even disastrous, for the needs of the local people.


In April 1995, President Bill Clinton successfully nominated James Wolfensohn9 to be the new president of the World Bank. Wolfensohn, an Australian-born, naturalized American, has the perfect background for the post. In the 1960s, he worked for the J. Henry Schroder Bank in London and went on to serve on the Rockefellers’ ‘population control’ organization, the Population Council.


Other Global Elite groups he has served include the Rockefeller Foundation, the Institute of Advanced Studies at Princeton, and the Brookings Institute. Add to that his position on the steering committee of the Bilderberg Group and his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission, and you have the perfect man to head the Global Elite’s World Bank. I’m sure none of this influenced Bill Clinton’s ‘decision’ to nominate him! In 1992, Wolfensohn joined forces with Lord Rothschild to form J. Rothschild, Wolfensohn, a business advice consultancy.


As chairman, they appointed Paul Volcker,10 the former chairman of the Federal Reserve Board and leading member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg Group. Volcker was the man who launched the devastating economic policies in the United States and the UK in the 1980s which were fronted by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is there to intervene when poor countries in Africa, Asia, and the rest of the developing world get into Elite-engineered financial trouble. The idea has been to encourage and bribe the politicians in these countries into relinquishing self-sufficiency in food and into opening up their lands to the multinational food and chocolate giants. These countries began to export luxury cash crops to the rich nations and to use that money to pay for imported food from those same rich countries.


Also, the developing nations would export natural resources to the rich nations at knock-down prices and then buy back (at inflated prices) the luxury products the industrialized countries made with those natural resources.


However, these luxury goods only go to the tiny, corrupt, political and economic clique in these developing countries. The majority of the population go hungry because the food-growing land is occupied by the multinational corporations. The Elite’s policy was to submerge the poor countries in debt and take them over in the same way they had with the multinationals and the industrialized nations. When these governments find themselves in financial trouble and unable to meet their debt repayments, in goes the IMF to ‘restructure’ the repayments or offer more loans to pay the interest on the previous ones. But, in return for imposing more debt, the IMF insists that its (Elite) economic policies are followed.


These involve cutting food, health, and education subsidies, and the exporting of more resources and cash crops.


The IMF tells all the developing countries to do this and thus creates a glut on the world market for these commodities and the price collapses. More is exported at the expense of food-growing land for the poor, but no more is earned. The winners are the rich nations who get their resources and commodities cheaper. As a result you have the sight of hundreds of thousands of Brazilian children dying through hunger related disease when Brazil is the second biggest exporter of food in the world.


But what a wonderful form of eugenics and culling of the non-white population!


A third of the Brazilian population lives below the poverty line and seven million abandoned children beg, steal, and sniff glue on the streets. This, in a country that should be among the most prosperous in the world, with no problem of feeding itself. Its problems are not natural. They are, like those throughout the Third World, manufactured for the benefit of the Elite. Don’t be kidded by all this stuff about compassionate ‘overseas aid’.

Every year vastly more wealth is transferred from poor countries to rich than goes the other way. We are bleeding them to death. And the overseas aid that is made available is not aimed at helping developing countries. It is used to bribe corrupt politicians, to build the infrastructure needed by the multinationals, or to subsidies industries in the rich countries, like Bechtel, who carry out the work as part of the aid deal.


Another reality of life on Earth:

There is no need for starvation and horrific suffering in Africa, Asia and Latin America. It is not the result of ‘natural disasters’, but of coldly calculated design.



Free’ Trade

The GATT policy is there to create dependency on the world economic system by forcing countries to drop their barriers to trade.


This concept of ‘free trade’ was advocated in the last century by the Scottish economist, Adam Smith, and it was designed, at least in part, to justify Britain’s refusal to stop the exports of opium into China. Pressure for Adam Smith’s - Elite-supported - view led to the repeal of the the debt scant 229 Corn Laws in May 1846, which removed protection for British agriculture from overseas imports. It was a disastrous policy, just as its architects (such as the Elite controlled Bank of England and the Baring Brothers Merchant Bank) intended it to be.


'Free’ trade has come a long way since then. GATT is now coordinated by the Elite’s World Trade Organization, based in its stronghold of Switzerland. It makes sense for the coordination of Elite banking and trade policies to be based in the same country, I suppose. Countries which add tariffs to imported goods to protect home producers are bad news for the New World Order. Such countries are far less dependent on the global system because they produce for themselves what their population needs. Trade in this sense is based on mutual benefit, not winner takes all.


In the early years of the United States, the government’s main income was from tariffs. If goods were going to be imported, all the people should benefit, it was believed. GATT, the European Union, the North American Free Trade Area, and the new Asian-Pacific free trade area (APEC), are designed to destroy this protection and create dependency on the global system which the Elite control. Over recent years the momentum has increased to destroy the diversity of production in all countries and make them dependent on importing essential goods.


The British Conservative Governments of Margaret Thatcher and John Major played their part to perfection in this. The suicidal ‘monetarism’ of the Thatcher-Reagan years destroyed the diversity of home production while the wave of ‘privatisations’ in the UK and elsewhere has handed the power over essential services like water, electricity, and gas into Elite hands - often with big government subsidies, to boot. The consequences of this can now be seen by all but the most dedicated idiot. But the media promotes ‘free trade’ as a good thing and ‘protectionism’ as bad.


They have bought the line sold to them by economists, politicians, and university lecturers, and they sell it to everyone else - the public. I remember when the latest GATT agreement was being negotiated (the so called Uruguay Round), how the famous news presenters in Britain summoned their most concerned and ominous voices to announce to their nightly audience of millions that the negotiations had broken down.


We should all be very worried, we were led to believe, because if the new GATT was not agreed upon, an economic nightmare would ensue. In truth, a nightmare for the Global Elite, not for the people. The Director General of GATT, Peter D. Sutherland (Bil, TC, Comm 300), was wheeled out to tell the world how important it was that the governments reached agreement. Sutherland, a former member of the European Commission and chairman of the Elite-controlled Allied Irish Banks, was well briefed with the Bilderberg Group’s views on the matter.


He attended their meeting in Finland in June 1994, and again in Switzerland in 1995. Of course, in the end GATT was agreed and passed through Congress and parliaments by governments and ‘oppositions’ alike, because the overwhelming majority of politicians of all parties are either too naive to see beyond the end of their noses (most of them) or they know what the game plan is (the relative few). The World Trade Organization has the power to impose sanctions on countries which erect barriers to the flow of ‘free’ trade. The Elite must have gone into orgasm when this lot was agreed. What a tool to control the world!

‘Free’ trade is the freedom of the strong to exploit the weak. It is the means through which multinationals, subsidized by their governments via the overseas aid budgets and other hidden channels, operate ‘cartelism’ against the interests of the general population. It is the freedom to create dependency on a system which only the few control, and to use that dependency to manipulate at will. The freedom to move production from high wage industrialized countries to the sweat shops of the Third World, savagely exploiting the native population.


The freedom to steal their food growing land and to destroy the industries and incomes of those in the developed world, also. In doing this, the Elite create anger, despair, and division, the perfect combination for manipulation. That, my friends, is the ‘free’ trade the economists, politicians, and news correspondents tell us we desperately need more of.


The word in my head at this moment does not bear repeating.


The Seven Sisters Oil Cartel

Working alongside the banks, and owned by the same people, are the oil companies. These are responsible for countless coups and conflicts and the grotesque manipulation of sovereign countries.


As late as 1882, oil had little commercial value. It was used in lamps and not much more. William “Doc” Rockefeller also peddled oil at $25 a pint as a cure for warts, snake bites, cancer, and impotency” In 1853 his son, John D. Rockefeller, formed the infamous Standard Oil Company to supply the fuel for the growth in oil burning lamps and to exploit the much greater potential claimed for the substance seeping through the rocks and fissures of the Earth. With the development of the internal combustion engine, the value of oil was transformed. So were the economy and politics of the world.


The British Admiral, Lord Fisher, was one of the first to see the military significance of oil and later, as First Sea Lord, he led the debate on how to secure supplies for the British Navy in a country which, at that time, had no oil of its own. As usual, the answer was: If we don’t have any, we’ll take someone else’s. An Australian engineer, geologist, and devout Christian called William Knox d’Arcy had found oil north of the Persian Gulf, in what is now Iran. He had bought the rights to exploit it from the Shah for $20,000 and agreed to pay a 16% royalty on sales. The contract granted him and all his “heirs, assigns, and friends” exclusive rights to Persian oil until 1961.


The British Secret Service, on behalf of the government, dispatched the ‘ace of spies’, Sidney Reilly, to dupe d’Arcy into handing over his rights to the British. Reilly (real name, Sigmund Georgjevich Rosenblum from Odessa, Russia) posed as a priest and persuaded d’Arcy to sign over his exclusive rights to Persian oil to a ‘Christian’ organization, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company. In early 1913, at the urging of Winston Churchill, Fisher’s successor as First Sea Lord, the Asquith government secretly bought a controlling interest in Anglo-Persian Oil. We know this company better today as British Petroleum - BP.


The wealth of this company is founded on the work of an agent of the British Secret Service, the notorious spy, Sidney Reilly, who lied to, and hoodwinked, a gullible man by manipulating his devout Christian beliefs.


Given the behaviour of BP over the years, that is rather appropriate, really. For years, the competition between oil companies and countries seeking to dominate world oil supplies, led to conflict throughout Europe and the Middle East. Britain was responsible for stimulating wars in the Balkans, Turkey, and Bulgaria before 1914 to disrupt and sabotage the building of Germany’s ‘Berlin to Baghdad’ Railway, which threatened Britain’s grip on the Middle East. The British used their control of Kuwait to prevent the completion of the railway from Baghdad to the Persian Gulf. Using force and corrupt sheikhs, the British Government ruthlessly seized control of Arab countries and their oil supplies.


It was to set the scene for the conflict we have witnessed in the Middle East ever since, and the creation of the State of Israel was part of the divide and rule policy based on the control of oil. Can you understand why the Arabs today get so angry at what they see - quite rightly - as Western imperialism? They have had it up to here.

The other oil company controlled by the British government was Royal Dutch Shell,12 outwardly run by the Dutch-born, Sir Henry Deterding (Comm 300), a naturalized Briton. In fact, it was controlled by a group of parties who voted on behalf of the British Government. The covert support and guidance of the British government turned Shell into a global company which challenged the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, even on its own ground in America.


Deterding is another man often linked with the secret funding of Adolph Hitler and a future major shareholder of Shell Oil would be Prince Bernhard, a chairman and founder of the Bilderberg Group. In May 1933, Deterding entertained Hitler’s representative, Alfred ‘Protocols’ Rosenberg, at his estate near Windsor Castle. Researcher Oswald Dutch claims that in 1931, Deterding and his backers (the Samuel family) gave Hitler £30,000,000.


Eventually the ‘oil wars’ between the rival companies ended in the late 1920s with an agreement finalized at Achnacarry, Sir Henry Deterding’s Scottish Castle. This created the Anglo-American oil cartel which became known as the Seven Sisters.


The meeting between Deterding, John Cadman of Anglo-Persian Oil (BP), and Franklin D. Roosevelt’s close friend, Walter Teagle, of the Rockefellers’ Standard Oil (Exxon), was held secretly under the cover story of a grouse shoot. The Seven Sisters cartel has worked as one unit since then to control price and supplies to suit its sordid ambitions.


The ultimate control is with the Elite.


The Seven Sisters is comprised today of:

  1. Shell

  2. BP

  3. Esso/Exxon (Standard Oil of New Jersey)

  4. Gulf

  5. Mobil

  6. Standard Oil of California (SOCAL)

  7. Texaco

This virtual amalgamation of interests and policy mirrored to an extent the post-war banking mergers which created giants like the Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan, the amalgamation with the Kuhn Loeb (Rothschilds), Bank of Manhattan.


The oil industry, too, was divided between the Rockefellers (Rockenfelders) and the Rothschilds. Shell and BP were part of a power structure which included the British government, the Foreign Office, and the intelligence agencies. This remains so today.


There are countless examples of this government/oil company/intelligence agency connection at work. In 1941, the British and the Russians invaded neutral Iran on the nonsensical pretext that a few German engineers were there. Controlling the oil supplies of Iran had nothing to do with it, naturally.


The troops, backed up by smaller Indian and American forces, took over the country’s food supplies, causing the deaths of tens of thousands of Iranians through starvation. Typhus and typhoid killed yet more, as did the use of the railway for shipping lend-lease supplies to Russia which stopped heating oil from reaching the Iranian people in the terrible winter of 1944-1945. These were the countries who sat in judgment of war crimes at Nuremberg.

In response to this, the Iranian nationalist leader, Dr Mohammed Mossadegh, became prime minister in April 1951. He instituted a policy of nationalizing all oil production, with appropriate compensation to the foreign oil companies. The Iranian government also guaranteed supplies to Britain as before and the employment of British workers in Iran. The British Government responded by imposing an economic stranglehold on Iran, freezing her assets held in British banks, introducing full sanctions and an embargo on Iranian oil.


This was supported by other members of the Seven Sisters cartel. Mossadegh went to the United Nations to plead his case in 1953, but the Security Council, dominated by the US and Britain, did not want to know. He then went to Washington for help, but again got nowhere. The US sent a ‘mediator’ to Iran with a delegation full of people connected to the American oil companies. Who was this ‘mediator’? It’s that man again...W. Averell Harriman. His view was that Iran should accept the British position of Prime Minister Winston Churchill, his old friend. I never would have guessed that, would you? While the British and American press assassinated Mossadegh’s character and grossly misrepresented the situation, Iran did win its case, thanks to Mossadegh’s eloquence at the World Court. But by now his downfall was well-advanced.


Appeals for economic aid from the US were turned down by President Dwight Eisenhower (CFR) on the advice of his Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles (CFR), and his brother, the CIA chief, Allen Dulles (CFR). The Dulles brothers, in concert with British Intelligence, persuaded Eisenhower that Mossadegh had to be overthrown. Seventeen key members of the Eisenhower administration were members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Norman Schwartzkopf senior, the father of ‘Stormin’ Norman’ of Gulf War fame, had made many contacts in the Iranian army when he trained some of their generals during the war. He offered these people power if they overthrew Mossadegh. A coup, organized by British Intelligence and the CIA with the codename, Operation AJAX, removed Mossadegh in August 1953. The Shah of Iran was installed as a puppet of Britain and the USA until he was, himself, removed by those same forces twenty-five years later and replaced by the Ayatollah Khomeini.


This was part of the Elite’s ‘arc of crisis’ policy in the Middle East, which has ensured the Arab nations have remained divided and ruled. The Shah reversed Mossadegh’s policy and denationalised the Iranian oil industry. He and the CIA also established SAVAK, one of the most vicious intelligence agencies in the world. Its operatives were trained by the CIA and subjected their victims to sickening torture and imprisonment without trial. From about 1957 SAVAK began a close relationship with the Israeli/Global Elite intelligence arm, Mossad, which also trained SAVAK personnel. You thought Israel and Iran were different sides? Not at the top level they aren’t.


Another brave man to take on the Seven Sisters cartel was Enrico Mattel, the leader of Italy’s biggest non-communist resistance organization in the Second World War. It was Mattei who coined the term Seven Sisters. He wanted a self-sufficient Italy which was independent of the Anglo-American oil cartel. As head of the State energy company, ENI, he established a network of petrol stations across Italy which rivalled those of Shell and Esso. This expanded into refineries, a vast chemical plant, a tanker fleet, and an engineering subsidiary. He began negotiations with Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser and the Shah of Iran, to whom he offered 75% of all profits.


Mattei was challenging the Seven Sisters monopoly like no-one had before and his competition forced down petrol prices in Italy by a quarter. The last straw for the Seven Sisters came in October 1960 when Mattei went to Moscow to negotiate a deal to access the massive oil fields of the Soviet Union. Two years later to the month, as the pipelines were being constructed to exploit the Soviet reserves, Enrico Mattei was killed when his private plane crashed on a flight from Sicily, the home of the Mafia, to Milan. Charges of deliberate sabotage continue to this day. The head of the CIA station in Rome, Thomas Karamessines, who would later help to organize the coup against the Chilean leader, Salvador Allende, left Italy immediately after the crash without explanation.


The CIA chief at the time, the Knight of Malta, John McCone, owned more than $1 million worth of shares in Standard Oil of California, better known as Chevron. At the time of his death, Mattei was arranging to meet President Kennedy, who, according to some researchers, was pressuring the oil cartel to reach agreement with the Italians. A year later Kennedy himself was assassinated.

The oil companies, governments, intelligence agencies, the banks, the multinationals, the media: all of these are indivisible because all are owned or controlled by the same forces. The intelligence agencies work for the interests of the oil companies and vice versa.


Sir Henry Deterding was known to have been connected with British Intelligence as was Weetman Pearson (later Lord Cowdray), who sold his Mexican Eagle oil interests to Deterding’s Shell. Pearson (Comm 300) used the profits to establish the Pearson Trust, which owns The Economist magazine and the London Financial Times. It also holds a substantial share of the international merchant bank, Lazard Freres.


The Economist was launched in 1843 to press for the abolition of the Corn Laws and the advent of ‘free’ trade.



The Oil Price Shocks

The Elite coordinate a single overall policy through the many and various elements in the pyramid and nothing reveals more obviously how the banks, oil companies, and politicians work in concert than the oil price shocks of the 1970s.


Part of the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944 was to make the dollar the world’s premier currency and link its value to gold. It was decided that $35 would equal an ounce of gold and that US gold could be redeemed for dollars.


The United States government, however, found itself in serious trouble by the early 1970s, as so many dollars were exchanged for gold that US reserves couldn’t cope. An American financier friend, who has many contacts at high levels in the States, says that since this time there has been little or no gold in Fort Knox, although this is obviously covered up. President Richard Nixon decided to suspend the policy of exchanging dollars for gold. This sent the world financial system (those who didn’t know beforehand) into chaos.


Nixon was acting on the advice of his chief Budget Advisor, George Shultz (CFR, TC, Bil, Comm 300 and later Kissinger Associates), Paul Volcker (CFR, TC, Bil, and future head of the Federal Reserve), and Jack F. Bennett, a future director of the Rockefellers’ Exxon Oil.


On Nixon’s shoulder at this time was Henry Kissinger, of course. The other architects of Nixon’s policy were the financial institutions and merchant banks in the City of London. The ‘City’ is alive with Freemasonry and it is no coincidence that such a small country can have so much influence, via the City institutions, on the world economy. The Freemasons, and more particularly Illuminised Freemasonry, run the City and the UK Government, regardless of which party is nominally ‘in power’. Among the main characters in the manipulation of Nixon at this time were the merchant bankers, Sir Siegmund Warburg, Edmond de Rothschild, and Jocelyn Hambro (Comm 300).13


The dollar was revalued at $38 an ounce, but this was now only theoretical, because dollars could not be redeemed for gold. This created the so called Eurodollar market to handle the investment of the huge flow of dollars in Europe which once bought US gold. This Eurodollar market was based on London’s financial centers which made colossal profits from their ‘accidental’ windfall. Lord Roll of Ipsden (then Sir Eric Roll), was one who exploited this situation to great effect and made vast sums for S.G. Warburg. Roll is a former chairman of the Bilderberg Group, a Trilateralist, a member of the Committee of 300, and a board member of Kissinger Associates.

The value of the US dollar plummeted as a result of these events, but delinking the dollar from its exchange for gold was only the first stage in the Elite strategy. In May 1973, the Bilderberg Group met on an island at Saltsjoebaden, Sweden, owned by the Swedish banking family, the Wallenbergs (Comm 300). Under the chairmanship of Prince Bernhard, the meeting brought together 84 leading financial and political manipulators.


They included: Lord Roll of Ipsden from S.G. Warburg; Henry Kissinger; Robert O. Anderson, owner of Atlantic Richfield Oil; Sir Eric Drake, the chairman of BP; Sir Dennis Greenhill, a director of BP; Rene Granier de Lilliac, of French Petroleum; Gerrit A. Wagner, president of Royal Dutch Shell; Olof Palme (Comm 300), the later assassinated prime minister of Sweden; George Ball of Lehman Brothers; David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank; Zbigniew Brzezinski, director of the newly formed Trilateral Commission and future national security advisor to Jimmy Carter; Giovanni Agnelli, head of Fiat; Helmut Schmidt, the German Finance Minister; Otto Wolff von Amerongen of German Chambers of Commerce; and Baron Edmond de Rothschild. Also representing Britain were Denis Healey of the Labour Party and the Conservative, Reginald Maudling, another regular Bilderberger in the 1960s and 70s.


The meeting was organized by Robert D. Murphy, who, as US Consul in Munich, sent back favourable reports about Adolph Hitler in the 1920s.14 At this meeting, a presentation was made that was to affect the entire world. Walter Levy, the US Government’s official oil economist for the Marshall Plan after the war, announced a proposal to increase the price of oil by 400%.15 Just five months later, in October 1973, came the ‘Yom Kippur War’16 when Egypt and Syria unsuccessfully invaded Israel. It was this excuse that the Arabs used to massively inflate the price of oil, cut production, and announce an oil embargo against the USA for supporting Israel.


Yet again the world economy was thrown into a frenzy of pain and turmoil. In Britain, there was a three-day working week to preserve fuel stocks and millions lost their jobs and livelihoods throughout the world. The poor countries of the Third World were devastated, making them open to the next stage in the strategy - unrepayable debt. The architect of the Yom Kippur War was the US National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger. The ‘shuttle diplomacy’ for which he became famous and much revered was, in fact, a policy of misrepresenting each side’s position to the others, thus making war inevitable. This is what Kissinger did via the Israeli Ambassador in Washington, Simcha Dinitz, and his diplomatic contacts in Egypt and Syria.17


Look at the wars and terror that Kissinger has been responsible for and then remember this: in this same year, 1973, Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize! There’s nothing like a Nobel Peace Prize to hide what is really going on. Look at some of the other recipients and the timing. How do you win a Nobel Prize? Start a war secretly and then get the credit for stopping it. How appropriate that Alfred Bernhard Nobel, after whom the peace prize is named, made his fortune from the discovery of dynamite and the manufacture of explosives!

The Bilderberg Group had secured its enormous rise in the price of oil and so well had it been done, the manipulators also had someone else to blame for it - the Arab oil-producing countries.


This is a vital ingredient in every Elite strategy. Make events happen, but find someone else to blame for them so that you, the ‘innocent party’, can step forward with the ‘solutions’ to the problems you have covertly created. All of this had been long planned. Look at the sequence of events: through 1972 and 1973 before the Yom Kippur War, the multinational oil companies in the US, like the Rockefellers’ Exxon, had been cutting back on the domestic supply of crude oil, reducing stocks to alarming levels in time for the Arab Oil embargo and soaring prices they knew were planned in late 1973.


The oil companies were given a free hand to do this by Nixon on the advice of his aides, who included Henry Kissinger and George Shultz. In February 1973, Kissinger, Shultz, and John Ehrichman (who was implicated in Watergate) were appointed by Nixon as an ‘energy triumvirate’ and they effectively controlled US energy policy. Three months later came the Bilderberg meeting which agreed to the 400% oil price rise. Five months after that came the Yom Kippur War and the price rise and oil embargo on the USA. With domestic supplies so low, the US economy collapsed. All these events dovetailed perfectly.

We should not underestimate the role of Britain in this story. Diplomatic sources quoted in A Century Of War say that the British and Kissinger worked hand in hand in countless covert projects to manipulate events in other sovereign states. “The British, you know, were very clever” the sources said. “They were willing to let the Americans do the public dirty work and take the blame, while they worked very effectively on a more discreet level.. .(through).. .Chatham House.. .”18


And look at what Kissinger himself said in a speech to the Royal Institute of International Affairs at Chatham House on May 10th 1982.


Speaking of the Anglo-American special relationship, he said:

“Our postwar diplomatic history is littered with Anglo-American ‘arrangements’ and ‘understandings’, sometimes on crucial issues never put into formal documents...The British were so matter of factly helpful that they became a participant in internal American deliberations to a degree probably never before practiced between sovereign nations. In my period in office, the British played a seminal role in certain American bilateral negotiations...In my White House incarnation, then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department.

“In my negotiations over Rhodesia, I worked from a British draft with British spelling even when I did not fully grasp the distinction between a working paper and a Cabinet approved document. The practice of collaboration thrives to this day...”19

The British Foreign Secretaries involved in the negotiations to pull the UK out of Rhodesia were David Owen, then of the Labour Party, and member of the Trilateral Commission a year after leaving office, and... Lord Carrington, now chairman of the Bilderberg Group, a Trilateralist, and founding board member of his close friend’s company, Kissinger Associates. Another consequence worthy of note is that the leap in the price of oil suddenly made it far more financially viable to exploit the UK oil reserves in the North Sea by BP, Royal Dutch Shell, and others.


In January 1974, Kissinger’s reluctant puppet, The Shah of Iran, demanded and achieved another 100% increase in the price of oil by the Organisation of Oil Exporting Countries (OPEC).


The 400% increase decided upon by the Bilderberg Group had been achieved.



Third World Debt

So what did the Elite bankers and oil companies gain from the oil price shocks? Money, power, and manufactured dependency for great swathes of humanity. The economic collapse allowed the banks to accumulate yet more land, businesses, people, and control, and their oil companies flourished.


In 1974, the Rockefeller owned Exxon replaced General Motors as the biggest American corporation. But the real motivation went well beyond that. Part of the deal behind the scenes with the Arab oil producers was that a large percentage of the billions of dollars the Arabs were receiving in extra revenue would be invested in the global Elite banks.


The main recipients were Chase Manhattan, Citibank, Manufacturers Hanover Trust, Bank of America, Barclays, Lloyds, and Midland. They then set about ‘investing’ these enormous revenues in the poor countries of the world in Asia, Africa, and South America, who were forced to borrow to prevent starvation in the wake of the oil price shocks. The Rothschild-controlled Manufacturers Hanover Trust of New York, led the way in this.20 Millions of men, women, and children suffered and died from this callously created depression.

These loans which caused the debt crisis of the 70s, 80s and 90s were the Bilderberg Group’s ‘petrodollar recycling’ strategy at work. The deal with the Arabs was that oil would only be purchased in dollars, and that created another killing for the holders of dollars and Eurodollars in the USA and London. Kissinger ensured that the Saudi Arabians were well supervised.


David Mulford, the head of the London eurodollar operations of White Weld and Company, was made director and senior investment advisor to the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency, the country’s central bank. In 1974, 70% of OPEC profits were invested in stocks, bonds, and land overseas. Sixty per cent of this ($57 billion) went to the financial institutions based in New York and London in one year alone.

But even these incredible sums were nothing compared with the figures the recipient banks were actually lending to the Third World. Banks are allowed to ‘create’ new money (non-existent credit) many times in excess of the wealth they have deposited in their vaults and on their computer screens. If they lent only ten times the money they received from the Arabs in one year, 1974, they would have loaned (and charged interest on) $570 billion.


But thanks to a banking scam called fractional reserve lending, they could loan 26 times the funds they had on deposit and, in some cases, 66 times! This is the ‘debt’ that has caused such untold famine, poverty, and death in what we call the Third World. It is credit that does not, in reality, exist.


A third fact of life on Planet Earth:

The so-called third world debt which is crucifying great swathes of our fellow humanity across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, causing unspeakable misery, is debt on money that has never, does not, and will never exist!

The banks sent out representatives in droves across the Third World, lending money like confetti and looking especially for corrupt and incompetent politicians who they knew would waste it. Why would they do that? Because it was the land and natural resources of these countries the Elite are after, and still are.


They want them to default on their debts, that’s the idea. The plan was to offer them a forgiveness of debt in return for rights over those countries’ natural resources for all time. This is happening today and those leaders who refuse are being removed in ‘people’s revolutions’ and assassinations. The non-existent money was lent to the Third World at flexible interest rates. If world interest rates went up, the repayments increased. So, lend them the money when interest rates are relatively low, and then hit them with the sting.

Enter Paul Volcker, Margaret Thatcher, and Ronald Reagan at exactly the right time during the 1980s to launch the madness called monetarism which sent interest rates, and so Third World debt, through the roof. This policy, decided by the Elite’s International Banking Commission in Geneva, which swept across the world from London and Washington in the 1980s, began with the appointment by President Carter of Paul A. Volcker as head of the Federal Reserve Board. The President’s right to appoint the chairman of the ‘Fed’ is another little ploy to kid the people that the Federal Reserve is part of the government.


Carter was told to appoint Volcker by his puppeteer, David Rockefeller. Reagan said during his election campaign that he would replace Volcker. Reagan was elected, but Volcker stayed put. Volcker is a high ranking member of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group. So is his successor, Alan Greenspan. You get the picture? Monetarism, the oil price shocks, the Yom Kippur War, and Third World debt are all interconnected and part of a coordinated Elite policy to take over the planet on behalf of the Prison Warders. Across the world in the 1980s, the regulation of the stock markets, banks, and financial centers, was dismantled in the name of ‘freedom’.


The Elite’s control of the world financial system reached new heights. Companies which had served the community for a hundred years and offered sound employment to thousands were taken over on borrowed money by manipulating the share price and then asset stripped and destroyed. We heard the new wisdom of “You can’t buck the markets” and “Set the people free”.


They forgot to add “.. .and hand them over to the Elite cartels”.


In the United States, Ronald Reagan deregulated the savings and loans system through the Garn-St Germain Act of 1982. This opened the doors for the funds of these businesses to be looted by the CIA, the Mafia, and other organized crime. One of them, the Silverado Bank Savings and Loan, was a CIA operation.21


It crashed to the tune of billions of dollars which the American taxpayer is having to replace. On the board of Silverado Savings and Loan and its most prominent director, was Neil Bush, the son of George Bush (who had been at the forefront of deregulation).

This was the period of the yuppie, young people who could make hundreds of thousands of pounds and more in a week by guessing the future price of commodities desperately produced for export by the starving Third World. The effect in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, was beyond words. With each percentage rise in world interest rates, the repayments and the debts themselves soared.


All this and more continues today. Yet despite all this suffering, the interest rate policies of the Elite and its political stooges, meant that at the end of each ever more desperate year, these countries owed more than they had owed twelve months before, without borrowing a single extra cent. Meantime, the Elite banks like Citicorp, the Rockefeller/Rothschild Chase Manhattan, and the major British banks were reporting record profits.

The impression is given that all this debt was the result of stupid and corrupt politicians in these countries. Yes, there are stupid and corrupt politicians in the Third World, as there are in the House of Commons and the Congress, and the Elite are quick to seek them out and often promote them into positions of power. But many politicians in the Third World are neither corrupt, nor stupid. Their difficulty, once again, is that the banks, multinationals, intelligence agencies, the media, and governments, work as one entity to an agreed-upon policy.


Because of compartmentalization, most people involved in these organizations don’t even realize that this is the case. In August 1976, the heads of 85 non-aligned countries (those not involved with the USA or USSR), met in Colombo, Sri Lanka, to discuss the mounting debt crisis.


Their declaration called for a restructuring of the global economic system to remove the rigged, built in, subservience of developing countries to the industrialized world. It also demanded a resolution to the debt crisis which was swamping these countries in hunger and disease.


The United Nations did nothing. And one by one the leaders who signed and promoted the Colombo Declaration were removed from office. Frederick Wills, the representative from Guyana, was among them.


He told the authors of A Century Of War.

“The only Third World raw material that did well in the economic arena was oil, but the large oil reserves were centered on the Middle East, and manipulation of inter-Arab and Arab-Israeli conflicts, together with inculcation of penchant for prestige projects meant that Third World oil reserves could not be used as factors in Third World development. One by one Third World countries were gripped by inflation and starvation, by low life expectancy and high infant mortality. The Old Order of Canning, Castlereagh, Pitt, and Disraeli remains.”22

Note another reason for these policies.


The culling of Third World, non-white people. Eugenics. The Castlereagh mentioned there was a nineteenth century British Foreign Minister who handed over Europe to the New World Order bankers, particularly the House of Rothschild, at the Congress of Vienna in 1815. A devout student of this man’s methods was... Henry Kissinger.


It was Kissinger who blackmailed and threatened other developed countries into ignoring the appeals from the Third World and it was he, too, who set in motion the events that would remove those leaders, among them Indira Gandhi in India. This was done, as in many other cases, by sending in the IMF to enforce policies of such austerity that the leader was blamed and thrown out.


By now he had formed his own ‘consultancy’ called Kissinger Associates, the board members of which were Kissinger, Lord Carrington, Lord Roll of Ipsden, and Robert O. Anderson of Atlantic Richfield. All except Carrington attended the Bilderberg Group meeting in Sweden which agreed the 400% increase in the price of oil.


IMF debt restructuring became the buzz words for increasing the debts without lending another dollar. As a result the people of the Third World continue to suffer and all the Live Aids in the world will not change that unless we address the cause - Elite exploitation with the aim of owning the planet and everything upon it, and the way the people of the Third World are programmed to expect and create that reality.


Charity events like Live Aid, Band Aid, and Comic Relief are wonderful in that they help to highlight the plight of the developing countries. But we need to be addressing the cause, so that such charities are no longer needed. Charities are a symbol of a global imbalance. They only exist because of that imbalance. It is not gifts of charity which the Third World needs as a first priority, it is the dismantling of the system in which the rest of the world live off their backs and bleed them dry with the net outflow of funds and resources to the industrialized countries (read banks) every year.


The greatest gift we can give those people is a new vision of what they can achieve and what life can be like if they are determined to grasp it and create that reality. If you were born in unthinkable poverty and despair and in an apparently hopeless situation, you, like everyone else, would believe that life will always be like that. A day-to-day struggle, just to survive. Such a mindset will create, and continue to attract, that reality. Breaking the spiral of despair is vital to the creation of another and positive reality.


There are many ways this can be achieved, but giving people a belief in their own potential and how they can change their lives for the better is at the heart of any solution.



Stealing the Planet

Today we continue to see the next stage in the Elite/Third World debt strategy: to forgive or restructure the debt in return for land and resources.


The environmental movement is playing a part, mostly unknowingly, in this. One of the initiatives supported by many in the environmental movement is known as ‘debt for equity’. Under this proposal, the international debt of Third World countries is forgiven in return for handing over areas of wilderness and ‘environmentally sensitive’ lands. It is promoted as a system that wins both ways.


The debts of poor countries are reduced and these wilderness and other lands are protected. Unfortunately, the green movement in general has a very poor record of looking behind the smokescreens thrown up by the New World Order crowd. Firstly, the scheme would not reduce debt; it would change the nature of it and steal the lands of these countries. And secondly, who is behind the idea? Ladies and gentlemen let’s hear it for... David Rockefeller and Baron Edmond de Rothschild!


One example of this was something called The World Conservation Bank (WCB), which was apparently initiated at the Fourth World Wilderness Conference, held on September 13th 1987 at Denver, Colorado, and continued over the following four days at the notorious Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. James Baker, the US Treasury Secretary and long time buddy of George Bush, made a speech in support of the World Conservation Bank.


The official host of the World Wilderness Conference was George W. Hunt, an accountant and investment consultant, who had done some reading about world conspiracy ‘theories’. This helped him to realize what was going on before the eyes of some genuine environmentalists who had no idea how they were being manipulated. An interview with George Hunt appeared in Moneychanger magazine in the United States.


In that, he explained how the World Conservation Bank was being designed as a world central bank to create yet more debt in the Third World and steal the lands of the poor while trumpeting its success in reducing debt and ‘saving the environment’.


He said:

“...the banker Baron Edmond de Rothschild was at the meeting for six days. Edmond de Rothschild was personally conducting the monetary matters and creation of this World Conservation Bank, in the company of I. Michael Sweatman of the Royal Bank of Canada. Those two were like Siamese twins, and that’s why I say that it appears they were running at least the money side of this conference and I would say the conference was primarily to get money. Also, David Rockefeller (of Chase Manhattan Bank) was there and gave a speech on Sunday...” 23

The scam was to transfer the debts from the Third World countries to the World Conservation Bank and, in return, those countries would give land to the WCB.


Should the WCB collapse or get into repayment difficulties on the debts, it would then owe its assets to the global bankers, who would be at liberty to seize the lands of the Third World.


Alternatively, in the ever-gathering centralization, there could be a ‘takeover ’ of the WCB by the United Nations, thus giving control over the lands to this New World Order front.


As the fact sheet published by the Secretariat of the Wilderness Conference said:

“...plans for the WCB propose that it act as an intermediary between certain developing countries and multilateral or private banks to transfer a specific debt to the WCB, thus substituting an existing ‘doubtful debt’ in the bank’s books for a new loan to the WCB. In return for having been relieved of its debt obligation, the debtor country would transfer to the WCB natural resource assets of ‘equivalent value’.”

Problem-reaction-solution. If accepted, this would give the World Conservation Bank control over 30% of the Earth’s land surface through this means alone, never mind all the rest that the Elite own.


When George Hunt delivered a written protest to David Rockefeller via the ‘great man’s’ bodyguard, Hunt says he received a warning from Rockefeller’s office saying that: “I’d better stay out of politicking or I’d regret it.” Note also that while the manipulators are quite happy for loans from other countries to be, in effect, forgotten - ‘retained in-country’ for environmental projects - the loans from the Elite banks would not be forgotten.


They would be transferred from the Third World Countries (‘doubtful debts’) to the World Conservation Bank, which would guarantee the repayments in money or Third World land. Another well known face at this conference which initiated the WCB was the Social Democrat Prime Minister of Norway, Gro Harlem Brundtland.


This was appropriate because she recommended an organization like the WCB in the UNsponsored Brundtland Report on the environment called “Our Common Future”. This was compiled in league with David Rockefeller’s ‘green’ associates, Maurice Strong (Comm 300) and Jim MacNeill, two leading lights in the UN Commission on Environment and Development and the 1992 Earth Summit in Brazil. Same names, same agenda; on and on it goes. If it wasn’t so tragic, it would be funny. In fact, some of it is anyway.


In the Moneychanger article, George Hunt reported the contribution to the environmental debate made by Baron de Rothschild:

“He said innovation is the key to the pollution problem. We need growth and development. For instance, we have a CO2 problem. [Baron de Rothschild proposed] that we create large dry ice machines that will absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, and then take the dry ice that we create up to the polar ice cap to keep it from melting.”


Moneychanger interviewer: “Oh, come off it.”

“No, I’m not kidding. I said to myself, this guy has either lost his mind or... (Moneychanger interviewer in fits of uncontrollable laughter) “...or he is just laughing at us. Isn’t that something? And by the way I’ve got the whole conference on tape.”

I tried to track down the World Conservation Bank in 1995 and no-one seemed to have heard of it.


I rang Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, and the British Government’s Environment Department, and they all scratched their heads. I rang the United Nations Environment Agency and at first they acknowledged the name before returning to the phone to say that they, too, had never heard of it. Maybe it never got started or maybe it is working quietly out of the public eye, I don’t know. I do hope the first one is the case.


If you know what happened to the WCB, please let me know.



The Nuclear Power ‘Sting

One effect of the oil price shocks which the Elite oil cartels had to suppress was the move to nuclear power. I have great reservations about nuclear power and I feel it is just a middle stage before we realize it is possible to harness the natural energies of Planet Earth to give us all the safe, non-polluting, warmth and power that we need.


What is clear, however, is that there has been a well-organized campaign by the oil cartels to discredit and destroy nuclear power as a credible alternative to oil. What follows will provide more cause for reflection by the environmental movement, and give you another example of how the network of banking/oil-business/political interests work together to deceive and use people of genuine intent.


In December 1971, McGeorge Bundy (CFR, TC, Bil), the head of the Ford Foundation, arranged for the $4 million funding of a study called A Time To Choose: America’s Energy Future. This made its report in 1974, amid the energy debate stimulated by Henry Kissinger’s oil price hike. Bundy was Kissinger’s former dean at Harvard University and his boss for a short time when Kissinger was a consultant to the National Security Council of John F. Kennedy. The Ford Foundation report pressed for ‘alternative’ energy sources like wind and solar power, and dismissed nuclear power.


The oil cartel is quite happy with the conventional green ‘alternatives’ because they do not have the credibility to replace oil. They fear other alternatives, however, like nuclear power and, especially, the free energy technology which uses the Earth’s energy field. This is why the latter has been so soundly suppressed.

The expansion of nuclear power was another reason for the environmental agenda which was being stimulated in this same period via the Club of Rome and other Elite fronts. Here again we meet one of the oilmen at that infamous Bilderberg Group meeting which agreed to the oil shocks, Robert O. Anderson, owner of the Atlantic Richfield Oil Company and a board member of Kissinger Associates.


He channeled large sums through his Atlantic Richfield Foundation to organizations opposed to nuclear energy. One was to become a front-runner in the environmental movement: Friends of the Earth.


It was set up with the help of a $200,000 dollar grant from Anderson.24 He also donated to the Friends of the Earth campaigns against the German nuclear program in the mid-to late-seventies by people like FoE leader, Holger Strohm. The CFR/Rockefeller-controlled Ford and Carnegie Foundations poured millions into the environmental campaigns and pressure groups, as did the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Rockefeller Family Fund, and the Rockefeller-connected Mellon Foundations (Gulf Oil).25


The French Friends of the Earth director, Brice LaLonde, was a partner in the Rockefeller law firm, Coudert Brothers, in Paris. LaLonde was appointed Environment Minister in 1989 by the Freemason, Francois Mitterand (Comm 300). Robert O. Anderson, the multimillionaire oilman, was chairman of his own creation, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies. Where was most of the Wilderness Conference held which discussed the World Conservation Bank? ...the Aspen Institute. Anderson has used Aspen as part of his anti-nuclear power strategy and to highlight the environment as a global problem in need of a global - centralized - solution.


Aspen is partly funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Some of the trustees of the Aspen Institute were Robert McNamara (CFR, TC, Bil and World Bank President), Richard Gardner (CFR,TC, Bil, Comm 300), Lord Bullock of Oxford University, Russell Paterson of Lehman Brothers, Kuhn, Loeb Inc., and oil executives of Exxon, Gulf, and Mobil. Anderson appointed Joseph Slater from the Ford Foundation as Aspen President. Here we had a close knit and cosy bunch of pro-oil, New World Order manipulators. Surely there would not be an environmentalist to be seen in such company!

But wait, who’s this? There is a Maurice Strong named on the Aspen Institute Board. It couldn’t possibly be the same Maurice Strong I mentioned earlier as the friend of David Rockefeller, could it? The Maurice Strong who was the first head of the UN Environment Agency and ‘Mr Green’ at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio? It surely could. Given that this ‘environmentalist’ is a Canadian oil man, he would have had a lot in common with his fellow directors.

Aspen financed an international network linked to the UN called the International Institute for Environment and Development and on its board were Anderson, Strong, McNamara, and Roy (Lord) Jenkins, from Britain, the Labour cabinet minister, founder of the Social Democratic Party, head of the European Commission, Bilderberger, member of the Trilateral Commission, and a president of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.


Anderson’s strategy was timed to be ready to attack the nuclear power industry when its credibility was at its peak - the period following the leap in oil prices. Atlantic Richfield and the Rockefellers funded the anti-nuclear ‘green’ lobby, including the World Wildlife Fund, chaired by the Bilderberg Group’s Prince Bernhard, and later by Trilateralist and Rockefeller associate, John Loudon, an executive of the company of which Bernhard was a major shareholder, Royal Dutch Shell.

Today the WWF, now called the Worldwide Fund for Nature, is headed by Prince Philip (Bil), the environmentalist with a love of shooting birds from the sky. It is not only Prince Philip who can be seen to have a smoking gun in his hand. So can many who have shaped the environmental debate and the ‘solutions’ to Third World debt. It really is time for those in the green movement who genuinely care for the planet - the majority - to wake up and take another look at what they are involved in. There is one heck of a confidence trick going on.


Researcher, Dr Kitty Little, suggests another reason for the Elite’s attack on nuclear power.


Dr Little worked at the British Atomic Energy Establishment at Harwell between 1949 and 1958, and she has been a major contributor at the public inquiries into the nuclear power complexes at Windscale (Sellafield) and Hinkley Point. Her research and contacts over more than 50 years led her to believe that the French arm of the House of Rothschild is seeking to monopolize uranium and nuclear power technology, together with the technology for reprocessing spent fuel.


Dr Little says they are planning to achieve this monopoly by the time gas and oil supplies are running out. In pursuit of this, they are using environmental concerns and political manoeuvring to destroy the coal industry and to stop the development of nuclear power and reprocessing by national governments. They want to hoard the rights to this know-how themselves for when the world is running out of energy.


The privatization of the British electricity industry was part of this strategy of controlling energy supplies, Dr Little says.

  • Who privatized British electricity and helped to run down the coal industry? Lord Wakeham.

  • Who did he work for after he left the government? N.M. Rothschild.

  • Who advised the government on the privatization of electricity, coal, and gas? N.M. Rothschild.

  • Who advised the Hanson multinational in its efforts to acquire the privatized Eastern Electricity in August 1995? N.M. Rothschild.

The alleged KGB spy Donald Maclean was, in fact, feeding geology reports to Guy Rothschild in France, detailing where resources had been located, including uranium.


Maclean had access to these reports in his job at the Foreign Office. According to Dr Little, the Rothschilds now control 80% of world uranium supplies.26 I stress that I am not attacking Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, and the environmental movement in general. They have done some good work overall. I am merely pointing out that they can, and are, used to promote the New World Order, mostly (though certainly not in every case) without their knowledge. Again the Elite are not ‘pro’ or ‘anti’ the environmental movement.


They will use it when it suits their interests and undermine it when it doesn’t. The British Friends of the Earth campaigns director, Andrew Lees, a man I met and had great respect for, was found dead in Madagascar in January 1995 where he was filming the site of a proposed two billion pound mine, a joint venture between a subsidiary of the London-based multinational, Rio Tinto Zinc (RTZ), and the Madagascar government. The official verdict of a ‘heart attack’ sounds very convenient and coincidental to me.


When environmentalists can be duped into advancing the New World Order agenda, they are supported, congratulated, and patted on the head. When they are behaving in ways that oppose the plans of those in power, quite another approach is used towards them. So it is with all people and all subject areas.


When Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Ali Bhutto, proposed an expansion of his country’s nuclear power programme, he came under tremendous pressure from Henry Kissinger by August 1976 to drop the plan. Independent power supplies of whatever kind are not good for control and what the Elite fear more than anything is someone setting a good example that others will follow. What happened to Bhutto also fits in with Dr Little’s contention about the monopoly of nuclear technology. According to some Pakistani sources, Kissinger said that unless the policy was changed he would “make a terrible example of Pakistan.”27


Bhutto still refused and by 1977 he was overthrown in a military coup led by General Zia Ul-Haq, who reversed Pakistan’s policy of independence from the US Bhutto named Kissinger as the force behind the coup and, because he knew too much and was prepared to say it, the controlling world community sat on its hands while Bhutto was hanged.


From his prison cell, Bhutto wrote:

“Dr Henry Kissinger, the Secretary of State for the United States, has a brilliant mind. He told me that I should not insult the intelligence of the United States by saying that Pakistan needed the Reprocessing Plant for her energy needs.


In reply, I told him that I will not insult the intelligence of the United States by discussing the energy needs of Pakistan, but in the same token, he should not insult the sovereignty and self-respect of Pakistan by discussing the plant at all. I got the death sentence.”28

The list continues to mount. Even the campaign against nuclear power leads to the same people and the same agenda. And by the way, it was the Elite-puppet, General Zia Ul-Hag, who was used to trigger the war in Afghanistan. What Next?

What can we expect the banking-business manipulators to do from this point on? The Elite want the introduction of a world central bank that would run the planet as the Federal Reserve now runs America. All banks and money-flows would be controlled by the handful of people who would control the World Central Bank. The idea is to concentrate power into regional centers, as with the European Central Bank, and then fuse them together as one.


The present World Bank and IMF would be absorbed into this centralized global financial dictatorship. In the same way, the proposed European currency is a stepping-stone to the planned one-world currency.


The momentum towards this centralization will be furthered by increasing pressure to allow the United Nations to levy taxation via tariffs on all air travel, cross-border trade, or other means, to give it an income independent of the sovereign states it is supposed to be serving. It can then fund its own empire and the world army, which is being created by fusing NATO with the UN ‘peacekeeping’ forces. The world army is designed to ensure that no nation refuses to concede to the global dictators.


The manipulation is seeking to intertwine all economies and governments into a global system, from which even those who eventually see what is going on will find it very difficult to delink.


You only have to read the newspapers and the Elite publications to see what is afoot. In 1984, Professor Richard N. Cooper (CFR, TC) said in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs propaganda sheet that the world required a new monetary system:

“...I suggest a radical alternative scheme for the next century; the creation of a common currency for all the industrial democracies [sic], with a common monetary policy and a joint Bank of Issue to determine that monetary policy. ...The key point is that monetary control - the issuance of currency and of reserve credit - would be in the hands of the new Bank of Issue, not in the hands of any national government...


A single currency is possible only if there is in effect a single monetary policy, and a single authority issuing the currency and directing the monetary policy. How can independent states accomplish that? They need to turn over the determination of monetary policy to a supranational body.”29

This has been the Global Elite’s game plan for centuries. The manoeuvrings and the politic-speak can be observed every day. Look at what President Bill Clinton and the other heads of the elite Group of Seven (industrial nations), said in the summer of 1994.


Under the headline “G7 reaches out for new order - UN and finance reforms urged”, the London Guardian reported on July 11th:

“The West’s leading industrial powers yesterday took the first tentative steps towards the creation of a post-Cold War economic and political order, calling for a fresh look at the Bretton Woods financial institutions and a revitalized United Nations... “


...At the initiation of President Clinton and with the support of President Mitterand, the Group of Seven pledged itself to a revamp of the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the G7 itself. The world needed new global economic institutions to ‘ensure the future prosperity and security of our people’, Saturday’s communiqué said.”

The global currency is not intended to be physical money.


It will be entirely credit, figures on a computer screen. The plan is to replace all paper money and coins, and even credit cards, with a bar code inserted under the skin of every human being. This barcoding would be programmed with all the details about us, including our financial assets. You would go into a shop and pay for the goods by holding the bar code, probably in your wrist, over a beam at the check out.


This will read the bar code, check that you have enough credit, and reprogramme your under-the-skin bank statement to remove the amount you have just spent. This offers enormous potential for control. At present, if you go into a shop and the computer refuses your credit card, you can pay with cash. But what happens when cash no longer exists and the computer says no to your barcoding? You have no means to purchase anything. And, naturally, those who campaign against the (by then) global fascist /communist dictatorship, will find that the computer doesn’t want to know. Far fetched? Not in the least.


The technology already exists and it is only a case of bouncing public opinion into accepting it. We will be told that this system will end all tax evasion (no ‘readies’ to avoid taxation), stop credit card fraud, and help to fight the ‘war on drugs’, a classic problem-reaction-solution scenario, because the Elite control the illegal drugs market. Credit cards are a stepping-stone to lead us along the road to barcoding and the end of cash, just as microchipped identity cards are also stepping-stones to the under-the-skin microchip which will connect us permanently to a central computer - if we don’t wake up and stop it.

The day I completed a draft of this chapter, or thought I had, I went into the next room to read the newspaper. It was the London Times of January 6th 1995, and in there I found an article by writer Paul Penrose, headed “Will plastic smart cards be Europe’s common currency?” All that I had been writing that day, and had outlined in The Robots’ Rebellion, was there before me.


The best banking brains of the European Union are designing the money of the future, the article said. It made the point that the introduction of the planned European currency would be very costly for governments and businesses with all the new notes and coins involved. So there was a problem.


What could the solution be, one wonders expectantly? It couldn’t just be..? Oh yes it could.


I quote:

“One novel solution is to phase out physical cash altogether. Under this scenario, electronic money [credit] loaded into a microchip embedded in a plastic card would become the symbolic common currency of a united Europe. In the Federal superstate of the next millennium, there may be no rustle of Euro-notes, no jingle of Euro-coins, just the battery operated blip of machine-readable data changing hands.”

And, of course, something will be found to be less than perfect about this system once it is introduced and the cash has gone.


The solution to this ‘problem’ will be the barcoded human being. What is clearly planned to hurry along the world central bank and one world currency is a global crash and currency chaos, using the tried and trusted methods. For that to work and the public mind to be conned, the Elite will need to find a scapegoat for the crash, so the bankers and politicians can appear over the horizon on their white horses to offer the solution.


An Englishman called Jonathan May, who worked in financial and oil circles for many years, realized what was going on and began to tell anyone who would listen. He tried to form a group of wealthy people who could construct an alternative money system to the one the Elite controlled. Threats were made on his life in England and he moved to America to continue his work. When he tried to introduce a non-interest credit system for Minnesota farmers struggling under a mountain of debt, it was crushed by the Federal Reserve. He was charged with fraud and jailed for 45 years.

May says that not only did he not commit the crime - no crime actually took place! May’s view is that the oil price shocks of the 1970s and the tidal wave of petrodollars channelled from the Arabs, through the Elite banks, to the Third World, were part of the plan to crash the global economy at some future date. The Arab oil producers, especially Saudi Arabia, didn’t realize what they were being used for, May says, nor that the global oil and banking cartels were owned by the same people. He believes the plan is to forgive the debt of the Third World countries when the time is suitable in return for the rights to their natural resources forever.


This, says May, would mean the Arabs would lose their petrodollars held on deposit for a fixed term in the global banks (or rather, held by the companies created at arms’ length from these banks to protect them from the consequences of such action). Arab nations would then have to raise cash flow by selling off enormous amounts of their shares, land holdings, property, and businesses throughout the United States and the industrialized world. This, May’s scenario continues, would collapse the global economy and the ‘greedy’ Arabs would get the blame for it.


The bankers and politicians of the Elite in the midst of the chaos and turmoil would step forward with the solution.. .the end of cash and a one world credit currency administered by a world central bank.

I don’t know if that is precisely correct, but Jonathan May was obviously saying something the Elite didn’t want the people to hear. I am sure the plan involves events similar to this in outcome, if not in detail. May also reveals that the whole confidence trick is made possible by the unique privileges enjoyed by the banking trusts set up by the original John D. Rockefeller. Such trusts have since become illegal, but the ones already created have been allowed to continue.


May says that the ownership of these trusts was vested in thirteen long-established banking families, most of which will have been mentioned in this book.



The Food Bank

Another aim of the Elite is to control the land and production of food at every level of the process.


The natural crop seed varieties are being systematically destroyed and replaced by genetically-engineered seeds, which a handful of Elite-controlled multinational companies are patenting. Under Plant Breeder’s Rights legislation, anyone using these seeds must pay a royalty to these companies or face a six-month jail sentence or fines of up to $250,000. This applies to anyone from a Western farmer to a poverty-stricken peasant in Bangladesh. The same ‘patents’ are being applied to all plants, animals, fungi, genes, and viruses, that have been genetically tampered with.


The Uruguay Round of the GATT agreement has increased the hold that companies like Britain’s ICI (supported by BP) and the US giants have over global seed varieties. This is giving them control over what we eat and even if we eat. This was the GATT agreement that the politicians, the media, and the big-name news presenters were telling us was so vital to our economic well-being!


The ‘Green Revolution’ of the 1960s and 70s which was sold as a means to feed the poor countries of the world was, in truth, a means to steal the natural plant varieties used there and replace them with hybrids dependent on chemical inputs which the same companies monopolize.


The chemical inputs are killing the land and the body, in another form of population control. Control and dependency was the plan. The Rockefeller Foundation collected the seeds from 95% of the world’s major cereal crops in the years leading up to the GATT Agreement and the Plant Breeder’s Rights Bills. The multinationals are phasing out the varieties they do not have rights to and making the world dependent on those that they do. UN statistics estimate that 75% of genetic diversity in agricultural crops has been lost in this century and what is left is now in great danger. More than 1,500 varieties of vegetable seeds were withdrawn from use in England in the first few years after a national list of ‘approved’ species was established.


The costs of registering seed varieties is so high that only the multinationals can do it and yet genetically engineered varieties forced upon Third World countries are often useless in those environments. This adds to the hunger and debt. In India, a million farmers took to the streets when a US patent was awarded for the active genes of the neem tree, which has been used for centuries as a herbal remedy. No-one should own the patent to any seed or animal and especially not the mindset that controls the multinationals.

The farming policies of the European Community and those demanded by GATT have been designed to destroy the small and medium-sized farmer and allow the land and the market to be taken over almost entirely by the multinational corporations across the world. Over-production in agriculture, the butter ‘mountains’ and the wine Takes’, has not been caused by stupidity. It has been calculated to destroy smaller farms.


What is happening to the smaller farmers in the industrialized countries is only a continuation and expansion of the policies used to steal the land of the Third World farmers. Ninety per cent of the food trade on this planet is in the hands of five multinationals.


Half of our supplies are controlled by two of them, the Anglo-Dutch giant, Unilever (controlled by Bilderberg group clones), and the Nestle corporation in the Elite stronghold of Switzerland. Once again we see that ‘free trade’ is really cartelism, the means through which the vast destroy the small and get paid for doing so with public money.


As John D. Rockefeller Jr once said:

“Competition is a sin.” 30

In the European Union it is estimated that the multinationals receive between 10 and 12 billion German marks every year, merely for transporting goods and raw materials across national borders to repackage them and give the goods a ‘national image’.


The biggest beneficiary is Unilever, which has close family ties to the Sainsbury Supermarket Empire. Unilever increased profits in one year by 25.6%, at the same time that farming incomes in Denmark dropped by 35.3% and in Germany by 27.5%. Such are the profits to be made for the corporations that even car companies like Volkswagen and Daimler Benz entered the cattle-breeding market, a business which has led to the destruction of enormous swathes of rainforest.

This all fits into the global plan for dependency and control of every aspect of our lives. They want us literally to be robots, programmed to do as we are told, and the banking/business system is the backbone of this strategy. As with the wars and conflicts, I hope you can see that there is no need for all the poverty and economic suffering that we can hardly bear to witness on our television screens. This doesn’t have to happen. We allow it to happen.


There is enough for everyone - enough food, enough warmth, enough for all we need for a good life - yes, even with the number of people currently occupying Planet Earth. The suffering and poverty are there by design to control us, to divide and rule, and to create the fear within us that if we don’t conform and play the game by the rules of the Elite, we will end up in dire straits, also. Everyone for themselves. Winner takes all. It is a battle called survival, a battle to the death. The collective human mind has taken on those thought patterns and created this reality.

But remember, remember, remember. It doesn’t have to be like this. This doesn’t have to be the future. We are creating the future with every thought and act. If what we think and do changes, so will the future. If you summon your courage and get off your knees, we can leave our children a world that is truly, truly, free.


There is nothing and no-one who can stop us, if enough people demand an end to this manipulation and are prepared to work unceasingly to that goal. No, not even the Global Elite.





1 The World Order, Our Secret Rulers, p60-61
2 Sheldon Emery, “Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People” - a Spotlight newspaper reprint, (February 3rd 1986) p8. This article was a summary of Emery’s book of the same name.
3 Source: The United States Embassy, London
4 “Labour Hints At Bank Freedom”, The Times (May 18th 1995)
5 Sheldon Emery, Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People, p2~3
6 Figures from Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People
7 Ibid p1
8 Dr Kitty Little, submission to the Committee on Standards in Public Life (January 1995) pl5, paragraphs 53 and 54
9 Jewish Chronicle (April 17th 1995)
10 The Financial Times (March 3rd 1992)
11 Gary Allen, The Rockefeller File, p20
12 Royal Dutch Shell is the amalgamation of Deterding’s Royal Dutch Oil Company and the Shell Transport and Trading Co, owned by the shipping magnate, Marcus Samuel (Lord Bearsted).
13 F. William Engdahl, A Century Of War (Dr Bottiger Verlags-GmbH, Germany, 1993) p147. A superb expose of Anglo-American oil politics and its place in the New World Order.
14 A Century Of War, pl50
15 Ibid p149
16 Before the previous Arab-Israeli war in 1967, there was considerable UFO activity over Israel and the Golan Heights. This is often reported in war zones before and during the conflict. See Extra-Terrestrial Friends And Foes, by George C. Andrews.
17 A Century Of War, pl50
18 A Century Of War, pl80-181
19 Henry A. Kissinger, Reflections On A Partnership: British And American Attitudes To Postwar Foreign Policy (Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London, May 10th 1982). In June 1995 Kissinger was given an ‘honourary knighthood’ by the Queen for “services to Anglo-American relations”! He became an Honourary Knight Commander in the Most Distinguished Order of St Michael and St George (KCMG) in a ceremony at Windsor Castle. The Honour was bestowed on the recommendation of the Foreign Secretary, Douglas Hurd (London Daily Telegraph, June 14th 1995).
20 A Century Of War, p206
21 Rodney Stich, Defrauding America, A Pattern Of Related Scandals (Diablo Western Press Inc., Alamo, California, 1994) pl76
22 A Century Of War, pl79
23 Moneychanger magazine (December 1987, Memphis, Tennessee)
24 A Century Of War, pl59
25 Gary Allen, The Rockefeller File, p146-147
26 Submission to the Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life, p37-38, paragraphs 130-134
27 A Century Of War, pl82
28 Benazir Bhutto, Tochter Der Macht: Autobiographie (Droemer Knaur, Munich, 1989)
29 Foreign Affairs magazine (Autumn 1984 edition)
30 Gary Allen, The Rockefeller File, pl9

Back to Contents


Back to The Global Banking System