These editing and restructurings are 
				known, historical facts but also are quite evident in the Bible 
				itself: 
				
					
					For example, in the Old Testament neither the "Book of Jubilees" 
				nor the "Book of Enoch" were included. 
				
				
				Also despite being reference in both the books of Joshua and 
				Samuel, the 
				Book of Jasher was nowhere 
				included in the Old despite despite this clear importance to the 
				Hebrew writers.
				
				Two other works are also cited in the Bible. 
				
				 
				
				The Book of 
				Numbers draws our attention to the "Book of The Wars of 
				Jehovah". And in the Book of Isaiah we are directed 
				towards the "Book of the Lord". 
				
				 
				
				What are these books? 
				WHERE are these books? Despite other uncertainties the 
				differentiation between "Jehovah" and "The Lord" 
				is quite evident in their titles. 
				
				 
				
				This differentiation of titles 
				is also seen in the previously posted Deuteronomy CH 32 
				in comparing verse 8 and 9.
				
					
					8 - When the Most High assigned 
					the nations their heritage, when he parceled out the 
					descendants of Adam, He set up the boundaries of the peoples 
					after the number of the sons of God;
					 
					
					9 - While the LORD'S own portion was Jacob, His hereditary 
					share was Israel. 
				
				
				The reference to "Most High" 
				in verse 8 makes an abrupt (and objectively undeniable) 
				change of reference to "Lord" in verse 9, with 
				this reference to "Lord" presumed to continue on in verse 12 
				with, 
				
					
					"The LORD alone was their 
					leader, no strange god was with him". 
				
				
				Could this evident change in 
				reference actually represent a change in reference to a whole 
				separate, second being? Historical reference even across 
				time indicates this is in fact the truth: there is more than 
				one "divine controlling being" referenced in the Bible.
				
				
				Beyond doubt the reference in Deuteronomy chapter 32, vs 8 
				to "Most High" is an epithet that plays off of one applied 
				throughout the early patriarchy. 
				
				 
				
				Only from the time of Moses and 
				the moment of the meeting on Mount Sinai and speaking to the 
				burning bush was the being referred to as
				
				Jahovah or 
				YHWH. 
				 
				
				Jahovah (YHWH, Yahweh) is truly not 
				a name at all and, in fact is taken from the mistaken 
				translation "I am who I am" which was "Eya(h) escher eya(h)" 
				
				
				
				 
				
				The early reference during the patriarchal period to the being 
				in the times of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was 'El Shaddai' 
				or "Lofty Mountain". The correlation between "Most 
				High" and "Lofty Mountain" should be obvious here.
				
				In our modern Bibles, the definitions 'God' and 'Lord' 
				are used and intermixed throughout, as if they were one and the 
				same character, but originally they were not. One was a 
				vengeful god , and the other was a social god, and 
				they each had wives, sons and daughters. 
				
				
				 
				
				So, what was the name 
				given to the Lord in the early writings? It was, quite 
				simply, the prevailing Hebrew word for 'Lord', and the 
				word was 'Adon' or 'Adonai'. 
				
				To define who these two beings might be, we must look no further 
				than where these gods were actually operative, and the old 
				Canaanite texts (discovered in Syria in the 1920s) tell us 
				that their courts were in the Tigris-Euphrates valley in 
				Mesopotamia, in the Sumerian Eden delta of the Persian Gulf. In 
				tracing these ancient Sumerian records back to about 3700 B.C. 
				we discover that these two gods were brothers. 
				
				 
				
				In 
				
				Sumer, the storm god 
				who eventually became known as Jehovah was called 'Enlil' 
				or 'Ilu-kur-gal' (meaning 'Ruler of the Mountain'), 
				and his brother, who became Adon, the Lord, was 
				called 'Enki'. 
				
				
				
				 
				
				To the Canaanites, these gods were 
				respectively called 'El Elyon' and 'Baal' - which 
				meant precisely the same things ('Lofty Mountain' and 'Lord'). 
				
				
				 
				
				In different cultures they have been known as 'El Elyon' and 
				'Baal'; 'El Shaddai' and 'Adon'; 'Arhiman' and 'Mazda'; 
				'Jehovah' and 'Lord'; 'God' and 'Father'. 
				
				The old writings tell us that throughout the patriarchal era the 
				Israelites endeavored to support Adon, the Lord, 
				but at every turn El Shaddai (the storm god, Jehovah) 
				retaliated with floods, tempests, famines and destruction. 
				
				 
				
				Even 
				at the very last (around 600 BC), the Bible explains that 
				Jerusalem was overthrown at Jehovah's bidding and tens of 
				thousands of Jews were taken into Babylonian captivity simply 
				because their King (a descendant of King David) had erected 
				altars in veneration of Baal, the Adon.
				
				 
				
				It was 
				during the course of this captivity that the Israelites weakened 
				and finally conceded. 
				 
				
				They decided to succumb to the 'God 
				of Wrath', and developed a new religion out of sheer fear of 
				his retribution. It was at this time that the name of Jehovah 
				first appeared - and this was only 500 years before the time of
				Jesus. 
				
				 
				
				Subsequently, the Christian Church took Jehovah 
				on board as well, calling him simply 'God' - and all 
				the hitherto social concepts of the Adon were totally 
				discarded. The two religions were henceforth both faiths of 
				fear. Even today, their followers are classified as 
				'God-fearing'.
				
				The fact is ancient texts indicate us that it was Enlil (Jehovah) 
				who brought the Flood; it was Enlil who destroyed Ur and 
				Babylon, and it was Enlil who constantly opposed the education 
				and enlightenment of humankind. 
				
				 
				
				Indeed, the early Syrian texts 
				tell us that it was Enlil who obliterated the cities of Sodom 
				and Gomorrah on the Dead Sea - NOT because they were dens of 
				wickedness, as we've been led to believe, but because they were 
				great centers of wisdom and learning where mankind was 
				advancing.
				
				It was Enki (The Lord), on the other hand, who, 
				despite the wrath of his brother, granted the Sumerians access 
				to the Tree of Knowledge and the Tree of Life. 
				
				 
				
				It 
				was Enki who set up the escape strategy during the Flood, and it 
				was Enki who passed over the time-honored Tables of Destiny 
				- the tables of scientific law which became the bedrock of the 
				early mystery schools in Egypt.
				
				
 
				
				
				 
				
				Reconsidering Deuteronomy 32:7-12, given what is shown by 
				Biblical and historic facts themselves of there being two 
				individual "gods" involved, the change from "Most High" 
				to "Lord" is not surprising given the reference change 
				between two separate and distinct beings. 
				
				 
				
				Certainly the 
				reference in Deuteronomy CH 32:9 to Jacob as his "own portion" 
				(hereditary link reference?) and Israel as his "heredity 
				share", shows that more than one being was involved here and 
				that the one parceling out the earth was not awarding himself 
				Israel.
				
				
				Given the evident Biblical conflict between "Yahweh/Jehovah" 
				and "Lord" the known existence of the missing Books 
				of "Book of the Lord" and "Book of The Wars of Jehovah" 
				should be highly suspect. 
				
				
				 
				
				Perhaps the "Book of The Wars of 
				Jehovah" discloses the war between Jehovah/Yahweh (Enlil) 
				and Lord (Enki) and reveals what came to pass that led to
				Yahweh/Jehovah taking control of the Israelites when 
				the bush spoke to Moses on Mt Sainai.
				
				Beyond doubt, the true history has been rewritten.