August 5, 2000

Ark, Laura, Freddie, Jon, Carrie

Q: Hello.
A: Hello.

Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Komorrih.

Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.

Q: We have guests this evening; this is Jon and Carrie. They have traveled down from Ohio...
A: Really?

Q: Yes, actually. Jon, would you like to lead off? Or Carrie? [Negative.]
Okay. I guess I’ll go first then...
A: We would like to hear from your guests... We welcome Jon and his esteemed wife! Well....

Q: (J) I’m glad to be here, and...
A: You have been “here” before.

Q: (J) I guess I should add that I feel the service here is very important.
A: Important is good, but subjective. Start asking, Jon.

Q: (J) Okay...
A: Do you remember Mel?

Q: (J) No, no.
A: Search... We are attempting to get the ‘ball” rolling. Jon is reluctant. [Long pause] O.K., if Jon does not wish to participate now, we will let him “jump in” when comfortable.

Q: (L) I do have a question. It says here in this Top Secret document penned by the so-called Nexus Seven: “The bottom line is, ARC has discovered that it is very possible that confirmation, validation and consensus scientific acceptance equals an open invitation to invasion. Think about it. Denial may be one of the most powerful measures we have at our disposal to prevent the overt acceptance of the reality of advanced alien presence into the consensus consciousness. Denial is a munition.” They are saying that as long as the whole idea of alien presence remains in the realm of the fantastic and kooky, the implausible and mentally ill” that it is a line of defense against aliens. They see this as just a little “guided free will” to protect consensus belief using “popular deployable psychological munitions of belief.” They are saying that denial is a psychological weapon, a “deterrent of aliens into mainstream reality since the aliens seem to respect the stance of individual and group consciousness and acculturation free-will more than military might and power.
Therefore, we can, by accepting alien presence and existence above board in enough mainstream public, unwittingly turn off the restrictions against overt contact the aliens are following. The overt invasion trigger is our general human acceptance.” Could you comment on the idea that denial of the reality is protection? Is that, in fact, so?
A: No. Protection comes from awareness, not the other way around.

Q: That was an interesting idea to me, so I did want to pose it. Another idea in this document was that the patriarchal, monotheistic religion brought some measure of blanket protection. From this assessment, as soon as the patriarchal monotheism was installed on the planet, the alien presence withdrew. Is this a valid concept? Does the patriarchal monotheism act as a deterrent of alien intrusion into our reality?
A: This is a confused concept. Why would aliens install monotheistic principles if the result is to close off the contact opportunity?

Q: That’s what I thought myself. I mean, what better contact opportunity than under the guise of god, Jesus or angels or the Holy Ghost. Alien intrusion into our reality was, in my opinion, facilitated via the monotheistic religions. But, they did note that after the institution of monotheism, the APPARENT alien contact became much less, thus the conclusion they drew.
A: The two events are either coincidental or inaccurately measured.

Q: Well, it is clear that the whole monotheistic religion was a perfect front for the alien contact to continue to feed on humanity within the holy of holies of the temples. It did NOT stop, as this document suggests. The whole animal sacrifice thing, the offerings to the gods, the chanting and praying and all that; it just gives a whole new meaning to cattle mutilations! Sheesh! Okay, there IS something very interesting in this document. “What is the final ontological matrix of hidden truth? What elucidates all the aspects of the true-to-life UFO phantasm in our past, present and future? What are the critical goals of Echelon beyond information suppression and technological catch-up? What are the hyper-intelligence focal points for the future? The sun, our sun, is dying, and too soon. This was caused by regional dimensional vortex shutdown some 90,000 years ago. Solar instability can cause much life on Earth to be unsustainable in 40 years. Ancient astro-theology calendars all end around now. There are also dangerous interplanetary bodies, with civilization threatening capability due to cause more serious damage to Earth in another 150 years. One way or the other we are slated to leave Earth, sooner or later, or else. This is a prevailing secret truth. Those in control would rather save themselves and a few elite than worry about the whole of mankind, despite the presence of a few well meaning but deluded true human patriots amongst the bunch.” Is, in fact, our sun dying?
A: Yes, and so is everything else.

Q: Is it going to do it in 40 years?
A: You do not understand our attempted allusion. What is not dying?

Q: Well, I KNOW that, but they are saying that our sun is dying too soon.
A: No. What is “too soon?”

Q: Well...
(A) Forty years is certainly too soon!
A: Why?

Q: (A) Because scientists would normally give the sun much longer...
A: But do “scientists” really know?!?

Q: You are NOT helping here! Are you saying this guy is right?! I don’t want to talk about it anymore!
A: Be patient, Laura, this is a lesson.

Q: Is our sun slated to burp and blink out in 2012 with the Mayan calendar?
A: We asked YOU a question. It is impolite to not answer!

Q: (A) Well, no, scientists don’t really know; but they conjecture.
A: Ah hah! Conjecture!

Q: So, what’s your point?
A: Our point is: what is too soon and why?

Q: Too soon would be... well, I guess that in completely objective terms, there is no such thing as “too soon.” When things happen, it is exactly the right time for it to happen. When something happens, everything is perfect.
A: Okay.

Q: So, in the deepest sense, nothing is ever too soon... however... © What situations would have to be in place for this to happen within forty years?
A: There are unlimited numbers of situations...

Q: Are any of the situations that would have to be in place for the sun to burp and go out in forty years actually present and activated in our present time-line?
A: Burp?

Q: Well, you know what I mean! Expand, become a red giant, burn out, run out of gas, go supernova...
A: Some of those possibilities are always present, especially when combined with multitudinal external factors.

Q: What would the external factors be?
A: Energies, or cosmic forces present in space at various locators which the sun would pass through in its journey through space, for one example.

Q: Are we slated to pass through any of those energies or forces?
A: Wait and see.

Q: You guys can’t do that to me!
A: Yes we can!

Q: Well, let me ask the next question on that subject. Does any of this have to do with dimensional vortexes that were shut down 90 thousand years ago in the area of Sirius?
A: We are interested in knowing the “dimensional shutdown of vortex process.” Could you explain, please?

Q: Is there such a thing as a dimensional vortex?
A: Semantics.

Q: What would you call a dimensional vortex?
A: Once again, this is not flowing because you are navigating haphazardly through subjective proclamations.

Q: So, you are saying that all of this analysis of what the deep ontological truths are, is just subjective proclamations. Was there ever something that happened that might have been perceived by the person who wrote this material, as a dimensional vortex shutdown 90 thousand years ago?
A: What is that?!?

Q: So, basically, you are trying to point out that there is no such thing as a dimensional vortex shutdown. But, you have said that the planet Kantek exploded between 70 and 80 thousand years ago, right?
A: If so, that is not what the writer is attempting to portray

Q: Could it have been a supernova?
A: Look here! This is pointless.

Q: So, all of this stuff is nonsense?
A: No.

Q: Are you telling me that I am too dense to get what you are trying to say here?
A: We would normally not suggest something as harsh as that.

Q: Well, the only thing you didn’t say was “but.”
A: Okay; “but.”

Q: So, I am really missing the point here. Okay. What I am getting from what you are and are not saying, is that this person is clearly trying to portray something, and that there IS something behind what he is saying, but I am just too dense to figure out the right question so you can download the answer.
A: Dense? No my dear! You are just learning, as are we all.

Q: 90 thousand years ago. Is the 90 thousand a parameter for something? Can I start there?
A: We doubt it!

Q: Now, I did have a thought that this 90 thousand year cycle could be the period of the companion brown star you have said is on it’s way into the solar system. Is that what they might be talking about?
A: Closer.

Q: So, what they are really talking about, or may have seen in some way, is the
companion star, rather than the death of our own sun.
(A) Let me just ask a simple question. Can you estimate the likelihood that the sun will die in 40 years?
A: That is unlikely.

Q: Well, what a relief!
(A) We are done! How unlikely?
A: There is one chance in 189 million.

Q: Well, when I read this Top Secret document and they said this business about the sun, I just really wondered where they were getting all this! I mean, does the secret government really believe this crap? And if they do, and all their actions are geared around that, then that would explain a lot. But, if they don’t believe it, then they might even be responsible for putting out this kind of disinformation just to make people panic and get even more anti-government so they can have more excuses to clamp down on the masses and take away more freedoms! This Nexus Seven says right up front: “ This document is a clear and present danger to the mental health of unstable persons!” Well, they DID warn us! [Laughter] (A) Well, it’s a Val Valerian source! The fact that one or more things are wrong does not mean that everything is wrong!
A: Arkadiusz is right on the money!! There is much accurate information there and some disinformation mixed in!

Q: Yes. I figured out that as long as the Nexus seven guys were talking about the secret government echelons, the ideas of the compartmentalization, the views of the different factions about how to manage the alien threat, and so on, he was on pretty safe ground. But, when he launched off onto the many things that were clearly borrowed from a number of channeled sources, including Billy Meier, he really missed the boat. But, it made me aware that there are people in the government who really are following channeled material, who are using it to make their assessments, because they really don’t have much choice. They are as much against a brick wall as most everyone else in figuring out the whole scenario! I guess that Billy Meier and now this Anna Hayes, are their favorite guys because it appeals to their STS hierarchical mindsets. But, when they start to rely on channeled sources for their explanations, they run off the road because most of that sort of information is put out by the very beings they are trying to second guess, who clearly, from all their behaviors, have a serious vested interest in remaining behind the curtain, so to speak. It’s hardly likely that they are going to go to all the trouble doing wicked things in secret, and then blab all their secrets to every Gray Hugger on the planet who sits down with a pyramid on their head! And, when the abductors come and “take you to their leader” to “explain the facts of life” to you, because you have been “demanding answers” all your life, don’t expect them to tell the truth. It’s like the Wizard of Oz when he finally was unmasked: he was still a humbug and gave out fake hearts, fake diploma’s and worthless testimonials. There is a deep lesson in that scene! If the aliens are maintaining a covert operation, but then DO contact people, do they expect them to tell them the truth? Sheesh! You’d think these big shots in the military would figure THAT one out! It’s pretty standard intelligence maneuvers! I think that Nexus Seven runs afoul of his objective, unless his objective IS disinformation. I would like to know: what is the possibility for Sirius to go supernova?
A: Sirius is indeed a supernova candidate.

Q: Well, it’s about 8 light years away. I don’t think the human race would survive that one!
A: In the words of a wise philosopher: you would fry!

Q: (A) That’s a wise philosopher.
(L) What is the likelihood of Sirius doing the supernova number in the next hundred years or so?
A: Not good.

Q: So, we can forget that one for now. Okay, last session you brought up the subject of Frequency Resonance Vibration. You suggested that there are certain STS forces who are developing or creating or managing physical bodies that they are trying to increase the frequency in so that they will have bodies that are wired so that they can manifest directly into 3rd density, since that seems to be the real barrier that prevents an all-out invasion, the fact that we are in 3rd density and they are in 4th. Now, I assumed that the same function could be true for STO individuals. It seems that many individuals who have come into this time period from the future, coming back into the past via the incarnational cycle so as not to violate free will, have carefully selected bodies with particular DNA, which they are, little by little, activating so that there 4th density selves, or higher, can manifest in this reality. Is it possible for those energies to manifest into such bodies which have been awakened or tuned in 3rd density?
A: STO tends to do the process within the natural flow of things. STS seeks to alter creation processes to fit their ends.

Q: This Top Secret document and the Anna Hayes material to some extent, both talk about many abductions being “ourselves from the future” who have come back to the past, or what is for us, the present, to abduct their own bodies to make genetic adjustments so that they can advance and not make the mistakes they made in another timeline. Is that, in fact, part of the scenario?
A: Very close to the truth!

Q: Can you abduct yourself in an STO manner and help yourself in this way? Can that be STO?
A: It is not, because that is not STO.

Q: So, when that is happening, and if it is happening, it is occurring in the STS parameter?
A: Yes.

Q: How do the STO manage?
A: They do not concern themselves with such things.

Q: Well, if the STS guys are genetically tweaking themselves to have some kind of different outcome for some reason that we do not perceive, don’t you think there should be a balancing action on the STO side of some sort?
A: You are thinking in STS terms. But that is natural, since human 3rd density is STS.

Q: You say they don’t concern themselves with that. What do STO individuals coming back from the future into the past concern themselves with?
A: Answering calls for assistance with knowledge.

Q: What do these STS individuals coming back into the past hope to do by genetically tweaking their ancestors? What happened that they want to have happen differently?
A: Infinite number of possible answers to that question.

Q: So, they are coming from all different timelines with all different kinds of agendas - all designed to serve themselves.
(J) I was thinking along another line of questions. In 1995 I was in the Great Pyramid and it appeared that the King’s chamber activated in response to certain tones that we made.
A: Pyramids constructed through sound wave focusing.

Q: (J) Did it respond? Did we activate it?
A: Yes. Not activate, stimulate. Block fell.

Q: (J) We have been talking about moving in time, or at least out of this time/space dimensional fix that we are in... Is this important to continue?
A: You have already experienced some of this in dribs and drabs. The flash you see signals “time portal opening.”

Q: Do you see a flash?
(J) Maybe. I don’t remember one though.
A: Yes. Yes it is important to continue efforts. Found gene.

Q: Were you thinking something?
(J) No.
(A) There was the previous question about whether it was important to continue...
(J) The intent was to ask if it was important to work with Time Technology.
A: We answered.

Q: (L) Found gene? Maybe you have a gene for it?
A: Laura, let it rest please.

Q: (L) Okay, I won’t say any more.
A: Who is Helen?

Q: (L) Well, nobody knows. Helen of Troy? Jon is not very talkative tonight...
A: He is tired and disconsolate.

Q: Why?
A: Reflective. Trying to find time travel, when it is nearly within grasp with some current and past associations.

Q: Is sound what is going to make the machine work?
A: Networking.

Q: Is the present design the foundation to start with?
A: We wish no further comment.

Q: I guess they are saying you are very close...
(A) Just more power...
A: Leave this.

Q: Are we being monitored?
A: Maybe.

Q: (A) I want to know where this Nexus Seven comes from? Is it one guy or a group?
A: Group.

Q: Who are they associated with?
A: Hallinden.

Q: What is that? Hal Linden? We have this page in this Top Secret document that says “decode this simple cipher key and super secrets are available to you if you know how to slither.” Then, there is a code, and a couple of hints. I would like to know if it is a joke or if it is a real code?
A: Code is geometric. Not a joke.

Q: What is the point of this code? If we decode it, do the guys in the three piece suits come to our door?
A: Only if you telegraph it.

Q: (A) What is the point of this code?
A: Exercise to gauge communicative potential interest.

Q: (A) Who is to gauge?
A: Writer, et al.

Q: So, if somebody decodes it, and communicates to them that they have decoded it, what would happen?
A: If you contact group, you are “let in.”

Q: (A) Oh, I see. And the code is how to contact the group!
A: Close.

Q: (A) Do we want to be let in?
A: Up to you.

Q: Well, it says “slithery.”
(A) We can decode just for fun!
(L) I want to ask my stock question. How come my stocks are all going down? You told me to buy ‘em, I bought ‘em, and now they are all going down. I’m losing my shirt here!
A: No.

Q: Then tell me what’s going to happen with the stock market!
A: It will be there.

Q: Swell! Are my stocks going to climb?
A: What do you think?

Q: I have no idea! Give me percentage... a probability. What is the probability that I am going to be really happy with my stock picks by December?
A: 67 percent.

End of Session
 

Back to Contents

August 17, 2000

Q: Hello.
A: Hello.

Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Zallah.

Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.

Q: We received an email from some guy who says you guys are 5th density STS, dark forces, and all that. According to him, you are really leading us down the primrose path. It was a very upsetting email because he said that everything Ra said was absolutely the LAST WORD, and you guys are chopped liver, so to say. I shouldn’t even ask about it...
A: No reason for upset.

Q: I know. But, he did suggest that Don Elkins committed suicide because that was his pre-incarnative plan. Is suicide possibly part of a plan made before incarnation?
A: It is one of many choices available.

Q: In Don’s case, was it his plan to commit suicide at that point, or did he commit suicide because he was under such extreme attack?
A: Well, his suicide was his choice

Q: Was it his choice before he incarnated? Was it mapped into this incarnation?
A: It is a choice open to all.

Q: (A) I would like to know what was his reasoning. How did he justify this choice to himself?
A: It was an escape.

Q: An escape from what?
A: Displeasure.

Q: Displeasure from whom? Himself or others?
A: Many things.

Q: What did this displeasure relate to?
A: Not important!

Q: Did he feel this displeasure from Carla?
A: See previous response.

Q: What was important about what was in his mind?
A: When one feels displeasure, one sometimes chooses to exit.

Q: So it was HIM who was feeling displeasure. Did he have no pleasure in life? Was everything bleak and dark because of the information they were bringing through?
A: Laura, it is not necessary for you to probe further into this.

Q: If you guys were an STS 5th density source, obviously you would not tell us the truth about whether you were or not. But, I don’t think you are because so many things you have said have been verified. But, on the other hand, you have said that the STS forces have the ability to create confirming synchronicities to validate their disinformation. So, having things validated is not necessarily proof of STO orientation. I know it is a silly question, but how can one identify a 5th density STS source?
A: Not often communicative.

Q: My thought was that a 5th density STS being would be so encapsulated, so contracted, that they would hardly bother to GIVE anything... “give” being the operative word here. I would think that such beings live only in thought and are simply not WILLING to communicate. Is that correct?
A: More or less.

Q: Well, a couple of weeks ago, we had Jon Cunnygham here. When we sat down to have the session, and he was present, he was basically unable to say a word. He later remarked on the fact of how unusual it was that he was unable to speak. He was clearly almost paralyzed. Can you tell us why?
A: Jon is a fun type.

Q: When you say that, what do you mean?
A: Entertaining.

Q: Is he, as he believes, a 5th or 6th density soul who has come into this reality to help us change the universe?
A: By now, we feel your acquired knowledge is sufficient to answer that question for you.

Q: Okay, we have a woman coming on Wednesday to talk to us about putting this book together. Her name is Bobbie Jensen, and her company is called CasAnanda publishing. I do think we need some professional advice and help on this project because we don’t want it to look like we don’t know what we are doing. We could probably muddle through, but...
A: Maybe it is better if you do not know what you are doing.

Q: So, that almost makes me think that you think we ought to do it ourselves, even if we don’t know what we are doing. Maybe get a “how to” guide.
A: We feel you learn by observation, and, other ways too!

Q: Is trying to get the book out by January too soon, or should we wait for the May show?
A: When you schedule in matters such as this, not only do you bring about stress for yourselves, but you also may miss opportunities. It is that old “anticipation” bug again you know!

Q: So, there may be something else in store that we don’t even know about.
A: We see exponentially building interest out there... Who knows which parties may step up to the “plate.”

Q: Will the investment club work out; will it be a binder of the group or a source of contention?
A: If everyone understands the mechanics, there is no contention. by the way, you must be an impatient investor! Good things happen to those who have patience and avoid anticipation.

Q: What do you mean good things happen to those who are patient and avoid anticipation. I would just like to be able to buy more stocks and I don’t have the money.
A: Oh yes, a wee bit... and money flows from unexpected sources.

Q: Our little egroup discussion list is growing. Everyone is talking about the Wave: what does it mean, what is it, when is it coming, how are we going to be able to tell, and so on. I have been collecting the material and getting it in shape. I have been learning a lot as I go along as well. It isn’t finished, but as I go along, I do have some questions. We would like to have a little bit of a clue about the progress of the wave. I would also like to know if this Wave is sort of like the recompiling of a computer program, with the universe as the program? What is the progress, and is it going the recompile the program of our universe?
A: So many questions rolled up into one. But, one way it might go is that all of a sudden, everything that ever was is new, everything that IS is new, and everything that will be is new. Programs change, oh we suppose, what an awesome event indeed!

Q: Is it important for the information about the potential making new of everything and the awareness of the state of the planet as it is now, or the state of the universe, be shared and spread so that as many people as possible will be aware at the point of the arrival of the wave so that it makes it more likely that beneficial changes will occur, that the universe will change in a positive way? Or is that simply not even important. It will change the way it is going to change no matter what anybody does?
A: Closer to 2nd criterion.

Q: In other words, we are doing what we are doing, and it doesn’t really matter what we are doing. The Wave will happen, everything will change, become new, and that’s that?
A: What matters most is what others are doing, have done and will do.

Q: Who are these others that it matters most what they have done, are doing and will do?
A: Program rewriters, i.e. you and us in the future.

Q: So, what we have done, what we are doing, what we will do - WE - is important? I think that I missed something. I thought you said that what we were doing simply didn’t matter.
A: You are/will be others.

Q: Okay, how is what we are doing now helping or hindering this process?
A: No help/hinder, just is.

Q: So, this has all been done before? It’s a foregone conclusion how it is going to turn out? It’s a done deal?
A: No Laura, stop your linearishness!

Q: I don’t understand. Is what we are doing making a difference?
A: What is “time?”

Q: Time is an illusion.
(A) Is doing also an illusion?
A: If you are thinking in linear “time” terms.

Q: In other words, the best way for an STO future to manifest is for us not to anticipate that ANYTHING we do will matter. Because, if we are anticipating that what we do will make a difference, it won’t. It is wanting.
(A) I can’t stop thinking that my working is going to be useful!
(L) I can’t stop what I am doing either because it is what I DO. It is being ME. We have to stop anticipating. We do what is in us to do without expecting it to matter.
A: And you do it because you are directing you to do it from another plane of existence where you know the score. Where you are on your present awareness plane, you are largely, though not completely, scoreless and clueless.

Q: So, it is from another level of reality that we create THIS reality?
A: Close.

Q: How much input do we have from this level of reality regarding the creation of a future reality, and I use the term “future” loosely, but meaning “future” as we perceive it from this reality? How much input?
A: About as much awareness as a small child does when contemplating how to fly
the plane they are riding on.

Q: Well, you have talked about the Wave before, and I complained that we did not have time to do certain things that you had suggested that we do. You said that, yes we would, and that these things were suggested to “prepare” us for this event. Just trying to deal with it from a linear point of view, we still have to build this pool with the columns, get a Nobel prize, supposedly, work with people on the crop circles, and all that. Are we still looking at doing these things in this linear time progression that we exist in; that we are aware of as small children on a very large plane?
A: If you let it flow, it will flow.

Q: So, you are us in the future, we are you in the past - when you say this, are you “us” in the future in the sense of ALL mankind, or in the sense of any particular group of mankind?
A: In between those limited options.

Q: Could you be more explicit?
A: No, because you wold not “get it.”

Q: When I post material on the website, those people who resonate to the material believe that this refers to them also. I have been of the opinion that Unified Thought Form being must mean a very large group as represented in this density. I know that we are dealing with limiting terms. But, is this applied to people who CHOOSE the Cassiopaean option?
A: Maybe it is best to say it applies to those who recognize the application.

Q: So, if they recognize it, if they know it is them, they are part of it.
(A) But, thinking in nonlinear terms, its up to us to work to make this precise. You are asking this question which implies that the answer exists. But, exactly what the answer is may be it is not yet chosen, and it is up to us to make it this way.
A: Lodestar is a clue for you.

Q: I guess that means a guiding star of some sort. Something that attracts... a lodestone is magnetic, it is where the compass points. In the myth, Cassiopaea, Danae, and Athena work together to enable Perseus to cut off the head of the Gorgon and kill the sea monster and rescue Andromeda. Of all the mythical heroes, Perseus stands out because he was SUCCESSFUL. He went on the quest, he succeeded in the mission, he freed the maiden in distress, killed a slew of Lizzie types, balanced the situation in his environment, and then even lived happily ever after. He didn’t lose his reason, he didn’t fail... it is about the only really successful myth. He DID it. And did it well. Is that...
A: A quest is successfully followed one step at a time. No need to gauge the staircase.

Q: The only point I was trying to make was that maybe the only reason for the Cassiopaean connection, maybe even for the term “Cassiopaea,” is that it is the archetype of the function...
A: That is good, planning book fairs? Maybe not so good. We shall see!

Q: You guys, just basically, from the whole start of this thing about a book, have basically hinted that there is something else in store, and that we should not even try to do that...
A: We have not said that that is not the way. We have hinted that the way will become clear when it is necessary.

Q: (A) I think that it is good to have an external pressure to make things happen. Composers, like Mozart, had to be under pressure to produce. There should be pressure. We need to have income to build this pool and other things. So, if we put it into the indefinite future...
(L) But they said money will come from unexpected sources. I don’t know where or how that can possibly be. But YOU were certainly unexpected! I would have dreamed of YOU!
(A) Well, there may be another unexpected millionaire may come to replace me!
(L) Nobody could replace YOU!
(A) How else shall we explain this unexpected money?
A: No need to explain, or expect either, silly! You should know that the one time that Mozart wrote music under external pressure he quickly transited to 5th density.

Q: (A) Well I know that I work best under standard external pressure.
A: No, because you only sometimes think it is external, but it is not really. When you have been “treated” to external pressure, you have rebelled.

Q: (A) Okay. UFT. This is one of these things that I don’t know what it is good for, because the Wave will erase everything and make everything new. Yet, it is in me, so let me ask. I don’t know what it is good for, but I want to do it. Einstein was working on his UFT for like 30 years. Maybe more. He was changing his methods. At some point, did he realize that he found a solution? During all these thirty years, was there a point where he came upon the right solution?
A: Yes, but sadly, his solution for UFT largely erased TOR.

Q: (A) Once he found this solution, did he reject it because it erased TOR?
A: No. His progenitors sealed it, in order to keep intact the status quo.

Q: (L) His progenitors? Isn’t that your parents?
A: Other definitions apply.

[A source from which something develops.]

Q: (A) Can we have an idea of which year Einstein found the solution that erases TOR?
A: Sure, it was 1938.

Q: (A) According to what I know, between 35 and 38 there was a period in which Einstein published nothing. In 38, he published a paper with Bergman which was a revival of Kaluza Klein theory. That was exactly 1938. So, I guess that was the paper that was close.
A: Can you obtain a copy?

Q: (A) Yes, I have a copy.
A: Good!!! Clues abound within.

Q: (A) What I do not understand is why, a few years later, he completely abandoned that and started working very hard on a completely different solution. If he knew...
A: Was under control.

Q: (A) Can you control somebody and make him spend years.... Oh! Mind control! They got him!
A: Why do you think he emigrated to the United States in the first place?

Q: (A) Well, that is not a surprise. He was a Nobel Prize winner and America was getting together every possible Nobel Prize winner, and also there was the persecution of the Jews, so it was natural.
A: More to it than that. What about Freud?

Q: (L) I guess they didn’t want Freud! He didn’t know anything about UFT!
(A) Now, aparently Von Neumann was also involved in application of UFT. But, Von Neumann was, as far as we know, doing a completely different kind of mathematics. He didn’t even really know geometry, differential geometry. He was doing completely different things. So how come the UFT that was discovered by Einstein, involved Von Neumann. What did Von Neumann contribute to this project?
A: Von Neumann was one of three overseers at Princeton with level 7 security clearance, and a clear budget request permittance.

Q: (L) My question is, about Von Neumann, as I understand it, Von Neumann was supposed to have been involved with the creation of a time machine, right?
A: Yes.

Q: (L) Did he succeed in such a project?
A: Yes.

Q: (L) Well, why was it that, when he developed a brain tumor and realized he was going to die - and I read that he screamed and yelled like a baby when he knew there was no hope - if he was somebody who had access to a time machine, why wasn’t he able to do something about it instead of carrying on like a madman? The stories about his screams echoing all over the place, are horrible. He realized that his great mind was going to soon be still; if he had access to a time machine, one would think that he would have used it, would have pulled every string he could, to forestall his own death.
A: No Laura, it does not work that way. And besides, if you had a brain tumor, you could be forgiven for a few mental peculiarities too!

Q: (L) I just don’t understand why, when he knew he was sick, that he didn’t just use the time machine to go forward in time for a cure, or backward in time to correct something in his past...
A: The time machine was not his property.

Q: (L) So, they got what they needed from him and let him die.
(A) It is not clear. He got this cancer so suddenly, it may even have been induced.
(L) Well, that’s a thought.
(A) It is said that when he was dying, his brain was working perfectly and that was his tragedy. He could think, he could produce, he was a genius.
(L) What happened to him after he died?
A: 5th density.

Q: (L) Well, I figured THAT!
(A) At a previous time when we were talking about UFTs, my different options that I was trying to suggest, you told me to pursue the subject of torsion. All these Russians speak of torsion. Now, Einstein’s 1938 paper is a Kaluza Klein paper - no torsion. What is the story about torsion?
A: Clues hidden in the text.

Q: (A) Is there anything about Jason that we should do or think, in terms of his safety. We got the other car with the airbag. Is there anything else we need to consider regarding his safety?
A: Only his overactive libido.

Q: (L) Well, what are we supposed to do about that? You said that this was going to resolve itself.
A: Yes, but there may be bumps in the road.

Q: (L) Anything we can say to him, any chemical agent we can give to him... something we can do about this?
A: No.

Q: When you say “bumps in the road,” what exactly do you mean by that?
A: Wait and see.

Q: (L) Anything else about Jason or the other kids?
A: No.

Q: We got a call from Anna tonight who wanted to talk to Arielle on her birthday. I heard from Jason that the girls got mad at grandma and moved out because grandma showed the Times article to Aletheia’s boyfriend and Aletheia is now no longer speaking to grandma. I would really like to know if that child is possessed with a demon? I think that is pretty extreme!
A: She learns at her pace.

Q: (L) We did get some emails from Ark’s daughter awhile back, and she was posing a whole bunch of specious questions and trying to trap Ark into some kind of philosophical trickery and theoretical situations. It was clear that it was designed as a trap, and that she was going to snap it shut on him and tear him to shreds. She was using her own self as the case. She invented a semi-mythical person who “might be the one,” but she could be wrong, and if she was wrong once, she could be wrong again, and so on and on. It was such a story. We wrote back to her and told her that if she had all these questions about her new guy, then he was obviously NOT the one. So, she wrote back and told us he got killed in an automobile crash within a few hours of our saying this cruel and terrible thing. Now, we were terrible people. Did she have this other boyfriend as presented?
A: Manipulations go psssst.

Q: (L) So, the only thing that got wrecked were her plans to manipulate. There was no guy getting killed?
A: See last response.

Q: In other words, her manipulations went psssst!
A: Close. At least it should. i.e. the less energy expended, the better.

Q: (L) What was her motivation? At first I thought it was true, then I realized that it was a game. I just reminded me of Anna.
A: Maybe she likes to yank your chain. Goodbye.

End of Session

Back to Contents