
	by Michael Snyder
	August 13, 2014
	
	from
	
	EndOfTheAmericanDream Website
	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	Let's be honest - Ferguson, Missouri is under 
	military occupation right now, and the entire world is watching in horror as 
	militarized police fire tear gas and rubber bullets at unarmed protesters. 
	
	 
	
	Yes, the
	
	rioting and looting in Ferguson needed to 
	be stopped.  
	
	 
	
	If order had not been restored, more stores and businesses 
	would have been destroyed.  However, there is no excuse for the brutal 
	tactics now being employed.  At one point, police snipers were even
	
	using laser scopes to target protesters 
	that were obviously unarmed.  
	 
	
	Sadly, this is just a preview of what is coming 
	to America in the years ahead.  
	 
	
	As the economy falls apart and people become 
	even more angry and even more frustrated, there will be a lot more incidents 
	of civil unrest like we have just witnessed in Ferguson.  And in response, 
	the federal government and our overly militarized police will seek to crush 
	those uprisings with overwhelming force.  How is it possible that our once 
	very peaceful nation has fallen apart so dramatically?
	 
	
	What we just watched happen in Ferguson was 
	truly bizarre.  If you didn't know any better, you might have thought that 
	you were looking at images from a really bad post-apocalyptic disaster 
	movie.
	 
	
	The following is how
	
	the New Yorker described the scene…
	
		
		Last night, as the images and stories from 
		Ferguson, Missouri, joined the news churn, many who registered their 
		thoughts via social media noted that what they were seeing -
		policemen with dogs and AR-15 assault 
		rifles standing in a Stygian, blue-lit cloud of tear gas; crowds of 
		protesters with their hands in the air, screaming "Hands up, don't 
		shoot"; members of the press being removed from the scene - did 
		not look like America.
	
	
	And I will certainly agree with that.
	 
	
	It did not look like America.  At least not the 
	America that I grew up in.
	 
	
	In a
	
	WND article, one woman was quoted as saying 
	that it looked "like something right off the streets of Iraq"…
	
		
		Cheryl Chumley has been watching 
		developments in Missouri, where Michael Brown was shot over the weekend, 
		and just overnight two more people were shot, including one by police.
		
			
			"Armored 
		vehicles on patrol, Kevlar-wearing, camouflage dressed officials carting 
		high-powered rifles, tear gas wafting through the air - sounds like 
		something right off the streets of Iraq. But it's not.
			 
			
			It's 
		actually the scene that's playing out in Ferguson right now, with 
		SWAT-type police taking to the residential streets for crowd control 
		duties," she said.
		
	
	
	Was all of this really necessary?
	 
	
	The rioting and the looting had already ended.  
	Was there really a need to fire tear gas at unarmed people?
	 
	
	In the video posted below, you can see footage of some of the craziness 
	that took place…
	 
	 
	 
	 
	
	 
	 
	 
	 
	
	And in this next video, there is footage of one protester holding his head 
	after being hit directly in the face with a rubber bullet by the police…
	 
	 
	 
	 
	
	
	 
	 
	 
	 
	
	In this day and age, images like this spread 
	like wildfire.  Thanks to social media, people all over the country and all 
	over the planet will get a first-hand look at how brutal our militarized 
	police have become.
	 
	
	And the more attention this gets, the more 
	likely that it is that violence will spread to more cities.  
	 
	
	Already, a major protest is being planned for 
	Sunday directly in front of police headquarters
	
	in Los Angeles.  A man was shot and killed 
	on Monday by the LAPD and people are upset about it.  They have seen what 
	has been happening in Ferguson and now they want to take action.
	 
	
	But wherever civil unrest does erupt, our 
	militarized police will certainly be there to quickly stamp it out.  
	
	 
	
	As a 
	recent Slate article detailed, the militarization of our police 
	has reached unprecedented heights in recent years…
	
		
		Since 2006, according to an
		
		analysis by the New York Times, police departments have 
		acquired 435 armored vehicles, 533 planes, 93,763 machine guns, and 432 
		mine-resistant armored trucks. 
		 
		
		Overall, since Congress established its 
		program to transfer military hardware,
		
		local and state police departments have 
		received $4.3 billion worth of equipment. 
		 
		
		Accordingly, the value of military equipment 
		used by these police agencies has increased from $1 million in 1990 to 
		$324 million in 1995 (shortly after the program was established), to 
		nearly $450 million in 2013.
	
	
	And when police get all of this equipment, it is 
	inevitable that they are going to use it.  One result of this has been the 
	astounding increase in the number of SWAT team raids in America.  
	
	 
	
	The following numbers come from my previous 
	article entitled "10 
	Facts About The SWATification Of America That Everyone Should Know"…
	
		
			- 
			
			In 1980, there were approximately 3,000 
			SWAT raids in the United States.  Now, there are
			
			more than 80,000 SWAT raids per year in this country.
 
			- 
			
			
			
			79 percent of the time, SWAT teams 
			are deployed to private homes.
 
			- 
			
			
			
			50 percent of the victims of SWAT 
			raids are either black or Latino.
 
			- 
			
			In 65 percent of SWAT deployments, "a 
			battering ram, boot, or some sort of explosive device" is 
			used to gain forced entry to a home.
 
			- 
			
			
			
			62 percent of all SWAT raids 
			involve a search for drugs.
 
			- 
			
			In
			
			at least 36 percent of all SWAT 
			raids, "no contraband of any kind" is found by the police.
 
			- 
			
			In cases where it is suspected that 
			there is a weapon in the home, police only find a weapon
			
			35 percent of the time.
 
			- 
			
			More than 100 American families have 
			their homes raided by SWAT teams
			
			every single day.
 
			- 
			
			Only
			
			7 percent of all SWAT deployments 
			are for "hostage, barricade or active-shooter scenarios".
 
			- 
			
			Even small towns are getting SWAT teams 
			now.  30 years ago, only 25.6 percent of communities with 
			populations between 25,000 and 50,000 people had a SWAT team.  Now, 
			that number has increased to
			
			80 percent.
 
		
	
	
	And of course African-American communities 
	receive a greatly disproportionate amount of attention from our militarized 
	police. Just imagine how you would feel if every time you saw a police 
	officer you cringed in fear because you might be about to get searched 
	again.  
	 
	
	The following is how author Michelle Alexander 
	put it in her book "The 
	New Jim Crow"…
	
		
		Ultimately, these stop-and-frisk operations 
		amount to much more than humiliating, demeaning rituals for young men of 
		color, who must raise their arms and spread their legs, always careful 
		not to make a sudden move or gesture that could provide an excuse for 
		brutal  -  even lethal  -  force.
		 
		
		Like the days when black men were expected 
		to step off the sidewalk and cast their eyes downward when a white woman 
		passed, young black men know the drill when they see the police crossing 
		the street toward them; it is a ritual of dominance and submission 
		played out hundreds of thousands of times each year.
		 
		
			- 
			
			So what can we do about this?
 
			- 
			
			How can we change the system?
 
			- 
			
			How can we reverse this alarming 
			militarization of our police?
 
		
	
	
	Unfortunately, our system has become so corrupt 
	that there is very little that we can do.  
	 
	
	In fact, one newly released study discovered 
	that average Americans have a "near-zero" 
	statistical impact on public policy…
	
		
		A startling new political science study 
		concludes that corporate interests and mega wealthy individuals control 
		U.S. policy to such a degree that "the preferences of the average 
		American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically 
		non-significant impact upon public policy."
		 
		
		The startling study (early draft), titled "Testing 
		Theories of American Politics - Elites, Interest Groups, and Average 
		Citizens" is slated to appear in an upcoming issue of Perspectives on 
		Politics and was authored by Princeton University Professor Martin Gilens and Northwestern University Professor Benjamin Page. 
		 
		
		Noted American University Historian Allan J. 
		Lichtman, who highlighted the piece in a Tuesday article published in 
		The Hill, calls Gilens and Page's research "shattering" and says their 
		scholarship "should be a loud wake-up call to the vast majority of 
		Americans who are bypassed by their government."