Press TV: In your opinion and 
				given your extensive investigations on the issue at hand, what 
				is the crux of the problem?
				
				Chossudovsky: Well the crux of the problem is that we are 
				at very dangerous crossroads in terms of strategic, geopolitical 
				relations and of course warfare and this is not what we might 
				describe a new Cold War because the Cold War had some safeguards 
				with regard to nuclear weapons.
				 
				
				There was dialogue, there was 
				consultation and what is happening in recent years is the 
				breakdown of communication, East-West communication. 
				 
				
				It is coupled with what we might 
				describe as the globalization of NATO, in other words NATO is 
				extending its grip beyond the so-called Atlantic region.
				 
				
				It has a military agenda which is 
				one of conquest, it states that it is a defensive agreement but 
				in fact its actions on Russia's borders are in fact of an 
				aggressive nature and we have various areas of potential 
				confrontation that are not limited to the Ukraine.
				
				We have now the issue in southeastern Europe with confrontation 
				between Armenia and Azerbaijan which is also on Russia's 
				doorstep, we have the issue of sanctions, we have also the issue 
				of maritime routes, the confrontation between
				
				the United States and China in 
				the South China Sea, bearing in mind that China and Russia [are] 
				allies under the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) 
				and then we also have the situation in the Middle East in 
				particular in Iraq and Syria which in effect is a war of stealth 
				between Russia and NATO.
				
				And… about the war on terrorism, we know that
				
				the war on terrorism is bogus 
				and that the only effective force which is fighting the 
				terrorists is in fact the Syrian government forces together with 
				the support of Russia, Iran and Hezbollah and that the United 
				States and its allies, and that includes
				
				NATO, are covertly supporting 
				terrorist organizations and in fact NATO right from the outset 
				in 2011 in liaison with the Turkish high command has been 
				involved in the recruitment of foreign fighters to join the 
				ranks of the al-Qaeda affiliated opposition in the Syrian war.
 
				
				
				Press TV: In your opinion, what are the dynamics behind 
				this, let's say, expansion of Russian influence 
				throughout the region not just in Europe but also in the Middle 
				East region which you just touched on?
				
				Chossudovsky: Well I think certainly
				
				Russia is playing a different role.
				
				 
				
				First of all it has military 
				capabilities which the Western military alliance has to take 
				account of, and it is both in terms of strategic and 
				conventional forces.
				 
				
				But I think the problem is that the 
				people who are making decisions particularly within the US 
				governmental apparatus and NATO, first of all they have very 
				little understanding of military issues, they are civilians and 
				they are not aware of the impacts, let's say of the use of a 
				tactical nuclear weapon. 
				 
				
				Ninety of those tactical nuclear 
				weapons are stored in
				
				Incirlik in Turkey and they are 
				under Turkish command. They are designated as harmless to the 
				surrounding civilian population in Pentagon documents which is 
				absolutely nonsensical. 
				 
				
				They have an explosive capacity 
				between one-third and six times Hiroshima bomb, and then
				
				Hillary Clinton says nuclear 
				weapons are on the table.
				
				So that when we have that kind of discourse where people in very 
				high levels of government are making statements that actually 
				point towards a World War III scenario, we are at a very 
				dangerous crossroads and I think we have to hope that some 
				people within that political spectrum of Western leaders will 
				start to see that building a relationship with Russia and China 
				to avoid military confrontation is ultimately the solution 
				because World War III is terminal. 
				 
				
				We cannot get into that debate but 
				'World war III' is not an option and the United States will not 
				win World War III. 
				 
				
				Nobody will win World War 
				III...