
	by Michael Rivero
	December 2008
	
	from
	
	WhatReallyHappened Website
	
	 
	
		
			
				
				"All war is based on deception."
				
				
				Sun Tzu
				
				
				
				The Art of War
			
		
	
	
	There is nothing new in a government lying to 
	their people to start a war. 
	
	 
	
	Indeed because most people prefer living in 
	peace to bloody and horrific death in war, any government that desires to 
	initiate a war usually lies to their people to create the illusion that 
	support for the war is the only possible choice they can make.
 
	
		
		-  President McKinley told the 
		American people that the
		
		USS Maine had been sunk in Havana Harbor 
		by a Spanish mine. 
		 
		
		The American people, outraged by this 
		apparent unprovoked attack, supported the Spanish American War. The 
		Captain of the USS Maine had insisted the ship was sunk by a coal bin 
		explosion, investigations after the war proved that such had indeed been 
		the case. There had been no mine.
 
		
		
		 
		 
		
		-  Hitler used this principle of 
		lying to his own people to initiate an invasion. 
		 
		
		He told the people of Germany (below audio) 
		that Poland had attacked first and staged
		
		fake attacks against German targets.
		
		 
		 
	
	
		 
		 
		
		The Germans, convinced they were being 
		threatened, followed Hitler into Poland and into World War 2. 
 
		
		
		 
		 
		
		-  FDR claimed Pearl Harbor was 
		a surprise attack. 
		
		It wasn't. 
		 
		
		The United States saw war with Japan as the 
		means to get into war with Germany, which Americans opposed. So 
		Roosevelt needed Japan to appear to strike first. Following 
		
		an 8-step 
		plan devised by the Office of Naval Intelligence, Roosevelt 
		intentionally provoked Japan into the attack. 
		 
		
		Contrary to the official story, the fleet 
		did not maintain radio silence, but sent messages intercepted and 
		decoded by 
		
		US intercept stations. Tricked by the lie of a surprise 
		attack, Americans marched off to war.
 
		
		
		
		 
		 
		
		-  President Johnson 
		
		lied about 
		the Gulf of Tonkin to send Americans off to fight in Vietnam.
		
		There were no torpedoes in the water in the Gulf. LBJ took advantage of 
		an inexperienced sonar man's report to goad Congress into escalating the 
		Vietnam War.
 
		
		
		 
	
	
	It is inescapable historical reality that 
	leaders of nations will lie to their people to trick them into wars they 
	otherwise would have refused. It is not "conspiracy theory" to suggest that 
	leaders of nations lie to trick their people into wars. It is undeniable 
	fact.
	
	This brings us to the present case.
	
	Did the government of the United States lie to the American people, more to 
	the point, did President  
	Bush and his Neocon associates lie to 
	Congress, to initiate a war of conquest in Iraq?
	
	This question has been given currency by 
	
	a memo leaked from inside the 
	British Government which clearly indicates a decision to go to war followed 
	by the "fixing" of information around that policy. This is, as they say, a 
	smoking gun.
	
	
	But the fact is that long before this memo surfaced, it had become obvious 
	that the US Government, aided by that of Great Britain, was lying to create 
	the public support for a war in Iraq.
	 
	
		
		-  First off is Tony Blair's 
		"Dodgy Dossier" (click below image), a document released by the Prime Minister that made 
		many of the claims used to support the push for war. The dossier soon 
		collapsed when it was revealed that much of it had been plagiarized from 
		a student thesis paper that was 12 years old!
		
		The contents of the dossier, however much they seemed to create a good 
		case for invasion, were obsolete and outdated.
		
		This use of material that could not possibly be relevant at the time is 
		clear proof of a deliberate attempt to deceive. 
 
		
		
		
		 
		 
		
		-  Then there was the claim about the 
		"Mobile biological weapons laboratories". 
		 
		
		Proffered in the absence of any real 
		laboratories in the wake of the invasion, photos of these trailers were 
		shown on all the US 
		
		Mainstream Media, with the claim they while seeming 
		to lack anything suggesting biological processing, these were part of a 
		much larger assembly of multiple trailers that churned out biological 
		weapons of mass destruction.
 
		
		
		 
		 
		
		-  The chief proponent of this hoax was
		Colin Powell, who presented illustrations such as this one to 
		the 
		United Nations on
		
		February 5th, 2003.
		
		This claim fell apart when it was revealed that these trailers were 
		nothing more than hydrogen gas generators used to inflate weather 
		balloons. This fact was already known to both the US and UK, as a 
		British company manufactured the units and sold them to Iraq.
 
		
		
		
		
		
 
		
		-  Colin Powell's speech to the UN was 
		itself one misstatement after another. 
		 
		
		Powell claimed that Iraq had purchased 
		special aluminum tubes whose only possible use was in uranium enrichment 
		centrifuges. Both CIA and Powell's own State Department confirmed that 
		the tubes were parts for missiles Saddam was legally allowed to have.
		
		 
		
		Following the invasion, no centrifuges, 
		aluminum or otherwise were found.
		
		
 
		
		-  Powell also claimed to the United 
		Nations that the photo on the left showed "Decontamination Vehicles". 
		But when United Nations inspectors visited the site after the invasion, 
		they located the vehicles and discovered they were just firefighting 
		equipment. 
		 
		
		Powell claimed the Iraqis had illegal 
		rockets and launchers hidden in the palm trees of Western Iraq. None 
		were ever found.
		
		Powell claimed that the Iraqis had 8,500 liters (2245 gallons) of 
		Anthrax. None was ever found.
 
		
		
		
		 
		 
		
		-  Powell claimed that Iraq had four 
		tons of VX nerve gas. 
		 
		
		The UN had already confirmed that it was 
		destroyed. The only VX ever found were samples the US had left as 
		"standards" for testing. When the UN suspected that the US samples had 
		been used to contaminate Iraqi warheads, the 
		
		US moved quickly to destroy 
		the samples before comparison tests could be carried out.
		
		Powell claimed that Iraq was building long-range remote drones 
		specifically designed to carry biological weapons. The only drones found 
		were short-range reconnaissance drones.
		
		Powell claimed that Iraq had an aggregate of between 100 and 500 tons of 
		chemical and biological warfare agents. Powell gave no basis for that 
		claim at all, and a DIA report issued the same time directly 
		contradicted the claim. No biological or chemical weapons were found in 
		Iraq following the invasion.
		
		Powell claimed that "unnamed sources" confirmed that Saddam had 
		authorized his field commanders to use biological weapons. No such 
		weapons were ever used by the Iraqis to defend against the invasion and, 
		of course, none were ever found in Iraq.
		
		Powell claimed that 122mm warheads found by the UN inspectors were 
		chemical weapons. The warheads were empty, and showed no signs of ever 
		having contained chemical weapons.
		
		Powell claimed that Iraq had a secret force of illegal long-range Scud 
		missiles. None were ever found.
		Powell 
		
		claimed to have an audio tape proving that Saddam was supporting 
		Osama Bin Laden. 
		
		 
		
		But independent translation of the tape revealed 
		Osama's wish for Saddam's death.
 
		 
		
		-  Colin Powell's UN debacle also 
		included spy photos taken from high flying aircraft and spacecraft.
		
		 
		
		On the photos were circles and arrows and 
		labels pointing to various fuzzy white blobs and identifying them as 
		laboratories and storage areas for Saddam's massive weapons of mass 
		destruction program. Nothing in the photos actually suggested what the 
		blobby shapes were and during inspections which followed the invasion, 
		all of them turned out to be rather benign.
		
		In at least one case, the satellite Powell claimed had taken one of the 
		pictures had actually 
		
		been out of operation at the time. 
		
		 
		
		And many 
		questioned why Powell was showing black and white photos when the 
		satellites in use at the time over Iraq
		
		took color images.
 
		
		
		
		 
		 
		
		-  Another piece of evidence consists 
		of documents which President 
		
		Bush referenced as in his 2003 State of the 
		Union Speech. According to Bush, these documents proved that Iraq was 
		buying tons of uranium oxide, called "Yellow Cake" from Niger. 
		(click below image)
 
		
		
		
		 
		
		Since Israel had bombed Iraq's nuclear power 
		plant years before, it was claimed that the only reason Saddam would 
		have for buying uranium oxide was to build bombs.
 
		
			
				
				
				
				
				
				Osama bin Laden's "Mountain Fortress", shown to the US public by 
				the corporate media, 
				
				and like Saddam's nuclear 
				weapons, never actually existed.
			
		
		 
		
		-  This hoax fell apart fast when it 
		was pointed out that Iraq has a great deal of uranium ore inside their 
		own borders and no need to import any from Niger or anywhere else.
		
		 
		
		The I.A.E.A. then blew the cover off the 
		fraud by announcing that the 
		
		documents Bush had used were not only 
		forgeries, but too obvious to believe that anyone in the Bush 
		administration did not know they were forgeries! 
		 
		
		The forged documents were reported as being 
		"discovered" in Italy by SISMI, the Italian Security Service. Shortly 
		before the "discovery" the head of SISMI had been paid a visit by 
		Michael Ledeen, Manucher Ghorbanifar, and two officials from OSP, one of 
		whom was Larry Franklin, the Israeli spy operating inside the OSP.
		
		In July, 2005, the Italian Parliament concluded their own investigation 
		and named four men as suspects in the creation of the forged documents:
		
			
				- 
				
				Michael Ledeen 
- 
				
				Dewey Clarridge 
- 
				
				Ahmed Chalabi  
- 
				
				Francis Brookes 
		
		This report has been included in Patrick 
		Fitzgerald's investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame, and Paul 
		McNulty, the prosecutor of the AIPAC spy case.
A recently declassified memo proves that the State Department reported 
		the fact that the Niger documents were forgeries to the CIA 11 days 
		before President Bush made the claim about the Niger uranium based on 
		those documents.
In the end, the real proof that we were lied to about Iraq's weapons of 
		mass destruction is that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found. 
		That means that every single piece of paper that purported to prove that 
		Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was by default a fraud, a hoax, and 
		a lie. 
		 
		
		There could be no evidence that supported 
		the claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction because Iraq did not 
		have weapons of mass destruction. In a way, the existence of any faked 
		documents about Iraq's WMDs is actually an admission of guilt. If one is 
		taking the time to create fake documents, the implication is that the 
		faker is already aware that there are no genuine documents.
		
		What the US Government had, ALL that they had, were copied student 
		papers, forged "Yellow Cake" documents, balloon inflators posing as 
		bioweapons labs, and photos with misleading labels on them. 
		 
		
		And somewhere along the line, someone 
		decided to put those misleading labels on those photos, to pretend that 
		balloon inflators are portable bioweapons labs, and to pass off stolen 
		student papers as contemporary analysis.
 
	
	
	And THAT shows an intention to deceive.
 
	 
	
	Lawyers call this "Mens Rea", which means 
	"Guilty Mind". TV lawyer shows call it "Malice aforethought". 
	 
	
	This means that not only did the Bush 
	Administration lie to the people and to the US Congress, but knew
	
	they were 
	doing something illegal at the time that they did it.
	
	All the talk about "Intelligence failure" is just another lie. There was no 
	failure. 
	
	 
	
	Indeed the Army agents who 
	
	erroneously claimed that missile tubes 
	were parts for a uranium centrifuge received bonuses, while the 
	
	Pentagon 
	smeared Hans Blix, and John Bolton 
	
	orchestrated the firing of Jose 
	Bustani, the director of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical 
	Weapons, because Bustani was trying to send chemical weapons inspectors 
	to Baghdad.
	
	The President of the United States and his Neocon associates lied to the 
	people of the United States to send them off on a war of conquest.
	
	Defenders of the government will point to the cases listed at the top of the 
	page as proof that lying to the people is a normal part of the leader's job 
	and we should all get used to it. 
	
	 
	
	And because "Everybody does it" that we 
	should not single out the present administration. But this is madness. We do 
	not catch all the murderers, yet when we catch a murderer, we deal with them 
	as harshly as possible, in order to deter more murderers.
	
	Right now, we have the criminals at hand, and, while other leaders in 
	history have lied to start wars, for the first time in history, the lie 
	stands exposed while the war started with the lies still rages on, to the 
	death and detriment of our young men and women in uniform. 
	 
	
	We cannot in good moral conscience ignore this 
	lie, this crime, lest we encourage future leaders to continue to lie to us 
	to send our kids off to pointless wars. 
	
		
			- 
			
			Lying to start a war is more than an 
			impeachable offence; it the highest possible crime a government can 
			commit against their own people.  
- 
			
			Lying to start a war is not only 
			misappropriation of the nation's military and the nation's money 
			under false pretenses, but it is outright murder committed on a 
			massive scale.  
- 
			
			Lying to start a war is a betrayal of 
			the trust each and every person who serves in the military places in 
			their civilian leadership.  
	
	By lying to start a war, the Bush administration 
	has told the military fatalities and their families that they have no right 
	to know why they were sent to their deaths. It's none of their business.
	
	Our nation is founded on the principle of rule with the consent of the 
	governed. Because We The People do not consent to be lied to, a government 
	that lies rules without the consent of the governed, and ruling without the 
	consent of the governed is slavery.
	
	You should be more than angry. You should be in a rage. You should be in a 
	rage no less than that of the families of those young men and women who have 
	been killed and maimed in this war started with a lie.
	 
	
	You need to be in a rage and you need to act on 
	that rage because even as I type these words, the same government that lied 
	about Iraq's nuclear weapons is telling the exact same lies about Iran's 
	nuclear capabilities. 
	 
	
	The writing is on the wall; having gotten away 
	with lying to start the war in Iraq, 
	the US Government will lie to start a 
	war in Iran, and after that another, and after that another, and another and 
	another and another because as long as you remain silent, and as long as you 
	remain inactive, the liars have no reason to stop.
 
	 
	
	As long as you remain inactive, the liars have 
	no reason to stop.
	None.
	It is time to fire the liars.
 
	
	
	"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is
	for good men to do nothing" .
	Edmund Burke
	
	
 
	 
	
	U.S.C. TITLE 18 - PART I - CHAPTER 47 - 1001
	
		
			- 
			
			Except as otherwise provided in this 
			section, WHOEVER, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the 
			executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the 
			United States, knowingly and willfully, 
				- 
				
				falsifies, conceals, or covers up by 
				ANY trick, scheme, or device a material fact; 
- 
				
				makes any materially false, 
				fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or 
- 
				
				makes or USES any false writing or 
				document knowing the same to contain any materially false, 
				fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined 
				under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
 
 
 
- 
			
			Subsection (a) does not apply to a party 
			to a judicial proceeding, or that party's counsel, for statements, 
			representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or 
			counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
 
 
- 
			
			With respect to any matter within the 
			jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply 
			only to, 
				- 
				
				administrative matters, including a 
				claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of 
				property or services, personnel or employment practices, or 
				support services, or a document required by law, rule, or 
				regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or 
				officer within the legislative branch; or 
- 
				
				any investigation or review, 
				conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, 
				subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent 
				with applicable rules of the House or Senate.