|
Audio Letter
#19
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 18, 1976,
and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER® No. 19. As our Bicentennial
Year of 1976 draws to a close, the United States of America is in
grave danger. Our economy is ravaged by the twin plagues of high
inflation and high unemployment, a condition which I named
STAGFLATION some years ago. Our Republic is under attack in a
far-advanced plan to bring our country under dictatorship. Our very
lives are under the threat of extinction in a surprise nuclear
attack which would be the beginning of NUCLEAR WAR ONE; and all of
these terrible things have been brought about deliberately by a
handful of ruthless, powerful men here and abroad, bent on world
domination.
“But how can this be?”, you ask. “How can so few people control the
destinies of all the rest of us?”
After all, it is easy to imagine how far our Secret Rulers and their
henchmen would get if they tried to take over even one city, much
less all of America, with their own bare fists and brute force. They
would be stopped in their tracks in no time flat because everyone
understands that kind of threat and there are far more of us than
there are of them. But those who want to enslave us understand this
all too well; they know better than to try any kind of frontal
attack on us that would be widely understood. Instead, they have
perfected the art of harnessing our own energies so that gradually,
step by step, we are enslaving ourselves under their control.
The Hegelian principle of thesis, antithesis, synthesis is being
applied so as to gradually merge our life with that of the Soviet
Union at every level! The average working man and woman in America
would never knowingly allow this to happen, and yet it is
happening—gradually, year after year.
1. The first step, called
Thesis, is to create and publicize aproblem in education,
economics, or otherwise in our daily lives. In other words,
where there is peace, create discord and trouble.
2. Step 2, Antithesis, is to create opposition to the
problem.
3. The final step, Synthesis, is to offer a so-called
solution to the problem.
This diabolical, roundabout approach
psychologically conditions people to accept things which they would
otherwise oppose vigorously. Just a look around with this in mind,
and you will see that this technique is being used all around you in
a thousand ways; but the real key to the success or failure of this
method of manipulating the public lies in something Abraham Lincoln
said over 100 years ago, quote:
“With public sentiment, nothing will
fail; without it, nothing can succeed.”
So long as we, the people, are simply
told the truth about things, public sentiment reflects the truth.
Under those conditions, real solutions can be found for real
problems to everyone’s benefit; but when we are not told the truth,
public sentiment reflects only what we believe and we can be
manipulated into supporting all kinds of things that are not in our
best interest.
Here in the United States a subtle, long-range propaganda
technique—known simply as MISINFORMATION—has been used to build up
an artificial and false picture of the world and our own nation. In
the areas of foreign policy, national security, politics, and
economics, the truth has been suppressed and replaced with an
elaborate structure of lies, distortions, and half-truths. This
false picture has come to be accepted as the truth with the result
that the truth itself has been rendered unbelievable. I don’t think
anyone in his right mind could do what has been done to us. Our
education, our CONSTITUTION, our free enterprise system, everything
possible has been perverted in order to confer ever more power on
our Secret Rulers. Now, WAR IS COMING. The wars of this century have
been fought far from our shores, but this time it is coming here—to
our land, to our homes, to our people! It will not be a conventional
war but NUCLEAR WAR ONE. As in all modern wars, it will begin with a
surprise attack. Thanks to the silence of the United States
Government and of the controlled major media, most Americans will be
caught completely by surprise, believing in a lie called detente
until thermonuclear fireballs erupt all around our nation.
To show how different the truth is from what we are led to believe
by our Secret Rulers, I will discuss these three topics today:
-
Topic #1 - WHY THE
UNITED STATES WAS NOT FIRST TO LAUNCH AN EARTH SATELLITE
-
Topic #2 - WHY MOST
AMERICANS CANNOT BELIEVE NUCLEAR WAR IS IMMINENT
-
Topic #3 - HOW THE
MAJOR TAX-EXEMPT FOUNDATIONS HAVE CLEARED THE WAY FOR SOVIET
NUCLEAR ATTACK.
Topic #1
- On the evening of October 4, 1957,
Americans were stunned by the announcement that the Soviet Union had
become the first nation in history to place a man-made satellite in
orbit.
Sputnik I, weighing 184 pounds, was circling the Earth every hour
and a half sending out beeps that became famous overnight. The world
was thrilled, and the world press heaped great praise on the Soviet
Union. They inferred from this accomplishment that the Soviet
socialist system was superior to our own in scientific and technical
progress. It was a historical first that can never be undone—the
Soviet Union had beaten the United States into space.
Less than a month later Sputnik II was launched. It weighed over
half a ton and carried the first live passenger into space, a dog.
The dog died within a week but it was another startling achievement
nonetheless.
Meanwhile poor old America was struggling along trying to put a tiny
16-pound satellite into orbit by means of the Navy’s Vanguard
rocket. Two launches were attempted, but both failed. In one case
the rocket lifted a few feet off the pad only to settle back into a
tremendous fireball as it exploded. It made exciting footage for the
television news that evening. Finally on January 31, 1958, almost
four months after Sputnik I, America launched its first space
satellite from Cape Canaveral, Florida. It was called Explorer I,
and it was launched not by the Navy but by the Army. We were in
space at last, but only after being thoroughly humiliated before the
entire world.
After the Sputnik shock, space flight and rockets were suddenly the
“in” thing to be interested in. Even then Senator Lyndon B. Johnson
arranged for a new “Aeronautics and Space Committee” to be set up,
with himself as its Chairman. He was thereafter as visible as
possible in connection with space matters, and today the manned
space flight center in Houston bears his name. At the time, I could
hardly imagine anything more hypocritical for Johnson to do. Even
though I was a lawyer, I had been a member of the then named
“American Rocket Society” for a number of years and had vivid
memories of Johnson’s attitude toward space in the early 50’s. At
that time, four or five years before Sputnik, I was a member of a
group headed by Dr. Wernher Von Braun who approached Johnson in
hopes of obtaining support for a space program. I’ll never forget
Lyndon Johnson’s reaction to the whole idea. He did not merely say
“No”, but jeered at the whole concept as ridiculous and worthless!
A few years later the United States was deprived of the chance to be
first in space, but not by Lyndon Johnson. What I am going to tell
you does not affect our national security now, but it does provide a
typical example of what has been happening to America for many
years. And as Wernher Von Braun lies on his death bed in a hospital
near Washington, D.C., I believe the time has come for the truth to
be told about why we were not the first to put a satellite into
space.
In late 1955 or early 1956, the Joint Chiefs of Staff began the
first act of planning for an American space program. Their goal: To
have the United States initiate the world’s first successful space
flight at the beginning of the International Geophysical Year that
was to begin on July 1, 1957. After some controversy as to which
Service should sponsor the space project, it was concluded that the
Army was most capable of doing the job. This was agreed to and
approved by the Joint Chiefs and by then Secretary of Defense
Charles Wilson.
The Army’s Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama was fortunate in
having the services of the world’s foremost rocket expert, Dr.
Wernher Von Braun. From a very early age Von Braun had been
fascinated with the idea of space flight, and he had spent his life
working with rockets. During World War II Von Braun was pressed into
service by Hitler, and the German rocket program was far ahead of
other countries by the end of the war.
When the war ended, many of Von Braun’s subordinates at the German
rocket base were taken prisoner by the Soviet Union and it was they
who were forced to develop and direct the Soviet missile and space
programs; but Von Braun himself had resolved well before hostilities
ended that he would surrender to the United States, and he succeeded
in doing so. Our Government then prevailed upon him to enter
governmental research where he would have the money and resources to
pursue rocketry in earnest. When the Earth Satellite project came
under consideration years later in the mid-50’s, the Joint Staff
project officers interviewed the Redstone Arsenal officials along
with Von Braun himself to ascertain their capability. Von Braun
stated that his group could engineer a space vehicle and have it
ready for orbit in only a few months. The Joint Staff pushed for the
Von Braun project; and after it was approved by the Joint Chiefs and
Secretary of Defense, it went to President Eisenhower for final
approval and allocation of Defense Department funds—but there it
stopped! Strangely there was a long delay in getting the expected
presidential approval.
Finally the word came down to the Joint
Staff from the President. Incredibly, they were to disregard the
Army’s capability and give the Space project to the Navy instead.
Such a decision was all but unbelievable. The Navy did not even have
a blueprint for such a space vehicle! They would be starting almost
from scratch; but the decision stood, so several large aircraft
companies and Navy scientists gathered to initiate a program called
“PROJECT VANGUARD.” As a direct result of this decision, the Soviet
Union was able to put Sputnik into orbit while the United States was
still struggling unsuccessfully with Vanguard. Joint Staff project
officers were most perplexed about the American political decision
to allow the Soviet Union to beat us in this endeavor when we had
the capability to be far ahead of them. It appeared to follow a
pattern of withholding American capabilities and allowing the Soviet
Union the advantage. Later, an aide to President Eisenhower
explained confidentially what had transpired.
A select group of scientists and financial leaders got wind of the
American space satellite plans at an early stage. The group, headed
by a man who was later awarded the Lenin Peace Prize by the Soviet
Union, went to the President and pressed him to sponsor a purely
American space project with only native Americans working on it.
They didn’t want by any means for a former German, such as Wernher
Von Braun, to give the world and future historians the impression
that the Germans of all people were superior in the field of space
science. This group, who were actually doing the bidding of the
Rockefellers on behalf of their Soviet allies, were instrumental in
forcing America to take a back seat in the early years of the Space
Age when we were fully capable of being supreme!
Finally, after two Soviet Sputniks and two humiliating Navy Vanguard
failures, Eisenhower became exasperated and told the Defense
Department to get Von Braun into action. Just six weeks after he
received the go-ahead, Von Braun’s Army team launched Explorer I. He
did exactly what he had said he could do two years earlier—and the
very first time he tried it; but the special place in history he so
richly deserved had been denied him forever, just as it had been
denied to the new homeland of his choice, the United States of
America. The anti-German argument that had been used on President
Eisenhower was, of course, a total fraud.
When Sputnik I was launched a short dozen years after World War II,
the Soviet rocket program was even more dependent on the efforts of
captured German scientists than was true in the United States. Thus
only one thing was really accomplished by delaying the Army
satellite effort under Wernher Von Braun: A tremendous propaganda
coup for the Soviet Union and a setback to American prestige and
self-confidence that persisted for years. It is a grim fact that
accolades go to the spoilers and traitors among us, but no acclaim
to our true heroes and men dedicated to American principles.
Under the enthusiastic leadership of Wernher Von Braun the United
States was able to come from behind to win the race to the Moon, but
soon the world press will have relegated him to the footnotes of
modern history. Like General Douglas MacArthur, Wernher Von Braun
will “just fade away.”
Topic #2
- When Secretary of Defense James
Schlesinger was fired by President Ford just over a year ago in
November 1975, he said, quote:
“Some years from now someone will
say, ‘Why weren’t we warned?’ and I wanted to be able to say:
‘Indeed you were.’”
But most Americans when reminded of this
parting statement by Schlesinger tend to be surprised. It is as if
his words have gone out into thin air, leaving no lasting impression
at all. This is a perfect illustration of the way in which the
American public have been left comfortably asleep by the controlled
major media of our country, oblivious to the steadily mounting
threat of war.
Around the world the alarms of impending nuclear disaster are
jangling louder and louder; but these alarms are muted, muffled, and
silenced by the time they reach you. When isolated facts about
American or Soviet military developments are reported, it is done in
such a way that it has little lasting impact on most people. Thus,
for example, you may hear a news item concerning the debate over the
new B-1 Bomber which the United States Air Force is developing.
Taken in isolation you may well wonder what all the shouting is
about and, for that matter, why such a new bomber is even being
considered in this age of missiles. Or you may hear a brief news
item mentioning that the Air Force wants to buy some F-15 Fighters
to augment our air defense system. Perhaps these things would make a
little more sense to you if you knew that the Soviet Backfire Bomber
began to be deployed operationally over three years ago!
The Backfire is a supersonic long-range
bomber capable of delivering nuclear weapons to targets here in the
United States—and that, my friends, is precisely its purpose, not
the so-called peripheral missions mentioned by some. Knowing this,
perhaps it would have struck you as a little strange that in 1974
after the Soviet Backfire Bomber began being deployed, the United
States virtually dismantled its air defense system. At the very time
that a renewed Soviet bomber threat was developing, our network of
interceptors was reduced to just six active Air Force Squadrons plus
six more in the Air National Guard! The extensive network of Nike
Hercules Antiaircraft Missiles under Army command was shut down
completely. But now, with war threatening to break out, the Defense
Department is reversing its position on air defense without telling
you why.
The mounting controversy over the relative military strength of the
Soviet Union and the United States has taken many people by
surprise. Almost 3-1/2 years ago the warning was sounded that the
Soviet Navy had become stronger than the United States Navy.
That’s what the world’s foremost naval authority, Jane’s Fighting
Ships, said in July 1973; but if you saw this reported at all by the
major media, did it make any impression? Or consider the matter of
long-range ballistic missiles. Over four years ago on November 27,
1972, the Soviet Union successfully test-fired a submarine-launched
ballistic missile with a range of 4,500 miles! By comparison, the
most advanced American sub-launched missiles have a range of less
than 3,000 miles. In addition, the development of a whole new series
of Soviet missiles was underway.
Early this month the Soviet Union began a 20-day period of tests of
the new submarine-launched SSNX-18 Ballistic Missile, firing them
into a circular zone 100 miles in radius in the North Pacific
southeast of the Aleutian Islands. The SSNX-18 now has a multiple
warhead capability; and these tests, which are full-operational
tests, extend over the full range of the missile which is now more
than 5,000 miles! Particular attention is being given to warhead
performance in these test-proving flights. If all goes as planned,
the SSNX-18 will be committed to full production and operational
status within a year’s time. The SSNX-18 will give the Soviet Union
a commanding lead over the United States in the realm of
submarine-launched ballistic missiles. But what have you learned
from network news reports or other major media about this missile?
Practically nothing. But the most tortured reasoning I have seen yet
appeared on December 6, 1976, in the New York Times. An editorial on
that date entitled: MOSCOW’S SUBMARINE MIRV begins with the
incredible words, and I quote:
“The Soviet Union’s first successful
test of a submarine-launched ballistic missile armed with MIRV
multiple nuclear warheads is good news paradoxically for the
United States and the world.”
The editorial then argues, in effect,
that since this will eliminate the one remaining missile advantage
held by the United States, it opens the door for the Soviet Union to
make concessions in SALT negotiations that could prevent either side
from acquiring a first-strike capability.
Such Alice-in-Wonderland reasoning may still serve the purpose of
lulling millions of Americans back to sleep, but it would not sit
well these days with most NATO Defense Ministers. For the first time
many officials of NATO are generally alarmed by the continuing
relentless build-up of Soviet power in Europe where the best Soviet
troops are concentrated.
For example, consider Denmark which sits astride the channels which
lead from the Baltic Sea to the North Sea. Soviet activity in the
Baltic has grown more and more ominous of late. Early in September a
Soviet task force suddenly materialized off the southeast coast of
Denmark, then left, then reappeared. All kinds of Soviet naval war
games are now being carried out practically on Denmark’s doorsteps
so close that they could suddenly turn into attack that would give
practically no warning. Danish Foreign Minister K. B. Andersen said
recently, “I’m astonished at what is going on. This is completely
contrary to the expectations created by the Helsinki agreement.” And
yet our kept press would have you believe that the new Soviet
SSNX-18 missile I just told you about is unimportant or even good
news, because of possible agreements the Soviet Union might make
about it.
At the NATO Defense Ministers’ meeting in Brussels earlier this
month, Admiral Sir Peter Hill-Norton of Britain warned that the
trend of the military balance between East and West is continuing to
move in favor of the Soviet bloc. He declared that more money and
better planning are needed if NATO is to match what he called the
“relentless determination” of the Warsaw Pact countries to achieve
military superiority. He warned that NATO can no longer rely
indefinitely upon the superiority of Western technology because
massive Soviet spending on research and development have resulted in
vast improvements in Soviet weapons. As Dutch Defense Minister
Vredeling said on December 8, the day after Sir Peter’s speech,
quote:
“The situation as far as the balance
of forces world-wide is more serious than many people think.”
And there are many other examples of
genuine alarm at the vulnerability of Western Europe to a
devastating surprise attack. What did Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld, who was and is a CIA operative, have to say to the NATO
ministers? He gave a brief nod to the wide-spread concern over the
Soviet build-up, but what you heard reported in the news emphasized
the following, and I quote:
“I think the alliance is healthy. I
leave my post as Secretary of Defense next month with a good
deal of optimism about the Atlantic alliance—the fact that it
survived some 26 years; the fact that it’s working, I think
reasonably smoothly at the present time; frankly reassured by
the fact that there is an Atlantic alliance, that it’s on watch
and doing its job.”
And so, my friends, we can all go back
to sleep, comfortably reassured.
Topic #3
- One week from today will be Christmas
1976. On that day most Americans will be celebrating the birth of
our Lord Jesus Christ by giving gifts to one another. The joy of
giving is something most everyone understands to a greater or lesser
extent. When presents are opened on Christmas Day, for example,
parents of small children usually get their greatest fun out of
watching their children open presents, not from opening their own
gifts.
In the same vein, people usually feel good about it when they give a
portion of what they have to help others or to support a worthy
cause. This is the foundation of what is known as charity—but
unfortunately there are always a very few among us who are motivated
not by a spirit of sharing but by runaway greed. Their only pleasure
in life comes from amassing more and more of this world’s wealth for
their own coffers and extending their power to control the wealth of
others as well. Ultimately those who are motivated this way reach
the point where they have so much wealth and so much power that it
is no longer enough just to add to it just still further. The only
thing left in life for those who have acquired wealth and power
through greed is to use that power and that wealth to play with the
lives and destinies of people. In short, they try to play ‘God’.
You may ask: Why would the Soviet Union go to war? Would the
super-wealthy of America want to create a dictatorship here with
themselves in control? You might as well ask: Why does the mountain
climber want to climb the highest mountain? Common answer is:
Because it’s there—just like the United States, the richest country
in the world, is there. What a prize.
Early in this century a systematic long-range program was begun by a
small group of immensely powerful people. The goal of this program
was to acquire ever greater control over American society. This was
to lead ultimately to America’s merging into a One-World Government
with themselves and their heirs in control. The method by which this
would be accomplished was the dismantling of the basic structure of
American society and its reconstruction in the image desired by
those who had decided to play ‘God’. And to carry out this
long-range program, powerful tax-free Foundations were established
and given the halo of philanthropy. They were explained to the
public as simply a special means the wealthy had devised for giving
to the public at large. Each Foundation was thus given the image of
an institutional Santa Claus.
Instead of questioning what they did, the American people were led
to accept their activities in the confident belief that they were
just showering wonderful gifts on our society day in and day out.
This is the picture that is still accepted as the truth by most
Americans. They believe it just as fervently as millions of small
children believe in Santa Claus. The raw truth about this network of
Foundations may therefore sound unbelievable—just as it sounds
unbelievable to a small child if he is told there is no Santa Claus.
For months now I’ve been referring to the role that has been played
by these Foundations in undermining American society and placing us
in the extreme peril we now face. Now I have been given permission
to reveal one of my primary sources of information about these
Foundations, and to repeat for you his own words about them. He is
my friend Mr. Norman Dodd. Mr. Dodd was Director of Research of the
special committee of the United States House of Representatives to
investigate tax-exempt Foundations in 1953 and 1954. The late
Congressman Carroll Reece of Tennessee was chairman of this very
important committee. Recently Mr. Dodd gave a rare speech here in
Washington, D.C., and he has given permission to repeat it here for
you. I will now be quoting him.
“This is not going to be a speech. This is a sharing of ideas born
of experience, and I’d like to begin by qualifying myself in your
minds.
I am a product of a strange type of education and schooling. The
education of which I am a product featured the importance of the
question ‘WHY?’ and then went on to try to instill in us the
importance of the question plus our responsibility as individuals to
find the answers. I happen to have taken this education and
schooling seriously and I have lived accordingly. In this schooling
to which I was subjected, great stress was laid upon the history of
this country to illustrate the feature I have just mentioned. As a
result I participated in and was witness to something in the nature
of a discovery—which was that in the 200 years of our history many
more truths made themselves self-evident than motivated our Founding
Fathers. One of these truths bears heavily upon the experiences that
I shall recite to you.
The truth, were it to be put in words, would read something like
this. I’ll repeat it slowly because it is quite significant and
deserving of considerable thought:
The condition or state of the
members of any nation at any given time reflects the use to
which the wealth they have produced is being put by others than
the ones who played a part in its production.
That brings me to two experiences which
I will describe to you. The first was my response to an invitation
from the president of the FORD FOUNDATION in his offices in New
York. His name:
Rowan Gaither.
Upon arriving there I was greeted with
the following:
‘Mr. Dodd, we invited you to come
because we thought that perhaps, off the record, you would be
kind enough to tell us why the Congress is interested in the
operations of Foundations such as ourselves.’
Before I could think how best to reply,
he volunteered this:
‘Mr. Dodd, we operate here under
directives which emanate from the White House. Would you like to
know what the substance of these directives is?’
My answer was:
‘Yes, Mr. Gaither, I would like very
much to know.’
Whereupon he said:
‘The substance of the directives
under which we operate is that we shall use our grant-making
power so to alter life in the United States that we can be
comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.’
Needless to say, I nearly fell off the
chair. As soon as I could recover myself to reply, I said:
‘Mr. Gaither, legally you are
entitled to use your grant-making power for this purpose, but I
don’t think you are entitled to withhold this information from
the American people to whom you are beholden for your tax
exemption. So why do you not tell the American people what you
have just told me?’
His answer was:
‘Mr. Dodd, we would not think of
doing that.’
That was one experience that was very
informative. It was incredible; nevertheless, it is the truth.
The next experience involved the acceptance of an invitation from
the CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE. This invitation came
in response to a letter which I had written the Endowment asking a
few pertinent questions. By ‘pertinent’ I mean that they related to
the effort of the Congress to determine if Foundations were engaged
in what the Congress said could be ‘un-American activities’, without
defining ‘un-American.’ I arrived at the office of Dr. Joseph
Johnson, who was then president of the Endowment. He was the
successor to Alger Hiss. Present were two vice-presidents,
relatively new men, and counsel (a partner in the law firm of
Sullivan and Cromwell). After amenities, Dr. Johnson opened the
conversation this way:
‘Mr. Dodd, we have received your
letter. We can answer the questions but it will be a great deal
of trouble. The reason for its being a great deal of trouble is
that with the ratification by the Senate of the United Nations
treaty, our task was done; and so we bundled up everything in
the way of records and sent them to the warehouse, and adopted a
policy of constructing a building across the street from the
United Nations which will serve as a facility for the benefit of
those many organizations which from this point on will be bound
to follow the activities of the United Nations. So we have a
counter suggestion which is as follows:
If you can spare a member of
your staff and send him to New York for two weeks, we’ll
provide a room in our library and also make available to him
the Minute Books of this corporation from its inception.’
My first reaction was that he had lost
his mind. I had some suspicion of what these Minute Books might well
contain; but here was counsel and there seemed to be no disagreement
on the part of the vice-presidents—and all of them were relatively
young, so my guess was that none of them had ever read the Minutes
themselves. As a result, I accepted the invitation and did send a
member of my staff to New York. That member brought back to me on
dictaphone belts the following:
We are now back to roughly 1908 when
the Trustees raised the question, asking themselves:
(1) Is there any way known to
man more effective than war, assuming they wish to alter the
life of an entire people? They discussed this question
academically and in a scholarly fashion for almost a year,
and came up with the conclusion that WAR is the most
effective means known to man, assuming that objective.
Then they raised question No. 2:
(2) How to involve the United
States in a war?
This was in 1909. I doubt if there
was any subject more removed from the minds of the people in
this country at that time than the possibility of involvement in
war. There were intermittent shows, you will remember, in the
Balkans; and my guess is that not many people in the country
even knew where the Balkans were.
They answered the question this way:
‘We must control the diplomatic
machinery of the United States.’
That brings up question no. 3, which
is:
(3) How do we secure control of
the diplomatic machinery of the United States?
and the answer comes up:
‘We must control the State
Department.’
That fits in with prior findings which
we had uncovered; namely, that the hand of the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace inside the State Department was a fact.
Finally, we are in a war. These Trustees have the brashness to
congratulate themselves on the wisdom and validity of their original
decision because already the impact of our participation in World
War I has indicated its capacity to alter our national life. They
even go so far as to word and dispatch a telegram to President
Wilson, pressuring him to see to it that the war does not end too
quickly!
Finally, the war is over. The Trustees then take up the problem
which they face: namely, of preventing, as they put it, a reversion
of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914. They came
up with the conclusion that:
To gain that end, we must control
education in the United States.
They realize this is a prodigious piece
of work so they seek and obtain the assistance of the ROCKEFELLER
FOUNDATION. They then divide the task into parts, giving to the
Rockefeller Foundation the responsibility of altering education as
it pertains to domestic subjects. They retain for themselves the
task of altering our education as it pertains to subjects bearing on
our international relationships. Then they decide together that the
key to this is an alteration in the teaching of American history, so
they approach three of the then existing prominent historians with
the proposition that they alter the manner in which, up to then,
they had presented the subject. They are all turned down flat.
They then decide that it is necessary for them to build their own
stable of historians. They approach the GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION, which
specializes in the awarding of fellowships, and suggest: When we
discover a likely young person who is studying and looking forward
to becoming a teacher of history, we will take him to London to
pursue his studies. So they take 20 to London, and these 20 are
briefed in what is expected of them. These 20 return and eventually
become the most active influence in the American Historical Society.
This coincides with the appearance which perhaps you will remember
of book after book the contents of which cast aspersion on the
Founders of this country, cast aspersion on the ideas which prompted
the founding of this country, and relegates them to the realm of
myth!
Finally toward the end of the 1920’s the Endowment grants the
American Historical Society $400,000 for the sole purpose of
rendering a report as to what the future of this country promises to
be and should be! This appears in seven volumes. The seventh volume,
of course, summarizes the contents of the other six, and it ends on
this note:
‘The future belongs to collectivism
administered with characteristic American humanitarianism and
efficiency.’ Well, in essence this was the whole story written
down; and Mr. Reece who was chairman of the investigation—the
last investigation of Foundations—hoped to be able to accomplish
this. He was not able to do this owing to the disinterest on the
part of the committee’s counsel and the violent activities of
one of its members. I might mention that that member whose
activities barred the way was none other than Wayne Hays—who has
come to the end of his career, although this marked the start of
it.”
Mr. Dodd concluded his talk with some
additional comments which I want to save for another discussion,
since they go beyond the subject of Foundations alone. But you may
want to replay what I have just recited from his speech, noting
carefully how different the truth is from appearances. And remember,
the truth has many enemies!
And so it is that the 20th Century has been an unparalleled era of
increasingly destructive warfare, violence, and terror on a
world-wide scale. By pursuing with relentless determination the goal
of merging the United States into ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, the Trustees
of the key group of major Foundations have brought us to the
threshold of NUCLEAR WAR ONE—to be waged primarily on American soil.
As I first revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12 for May 1976,
some of the present-day Trustees of these Foundations have been
awakening to the threat of a Soviet double cross in the grand plan
for world domination—and last summer this double cross got underway
with the planting of short-range underwater-launch nuclear missiles
within the territorial waters of the United States, as well as of
many other countries. But the world-wide economic and political
empire that is today presided over by the Four Rockefeller Brothers
is so huge that it includes many individuals who still do not
believe that any Soviet double cross will take place, much less that
it is already underway.
CHEMICAL WARFARE ALREADY UNDERWAY
For example, last month I reported that 18 Soviet submarines
were deployed along our west coast preparing to inject plutonium
particles into the air on November 20, 1976. And our own EPA—the
Environmental Protection Agency—was cooperating by telling us that
on that date a radioactive cloud from a Chinese atomic test would
begin passing over our west coast, when actually the radioactive
cloud from China had not yet left China’s own borders! By
interesting coincidence, Russell Trane, the head of the EPA, arrived
in a presumably safe location, Moscow, on November 19 - the day
before the plutonium was to be released by the Soviet subs. With
appropriate irony, he arrived there as head of the United States
delegation to the “Soviet-American Commission for Cooperation in
Environmental Protection.” Can you imagine?
The plutonium was released by the subs as scheduled on November 20;
but just as happened when this was done the first time in early
October, unusual weather conditions kept the United States from
being badly contaminated. The plutonium cloud drifted across the
upper part of the United States and had little effect at ground
level. But, my friends, the Soviets never give up.
Five days ago on December 13 I learned that Soviet submarines were
lining up along the northwest coast of the United States for the
third time for this purpose. This time there are 21 submarines
loaded with plutonium poison to inject into our atmosphere.
According to my latest Intelligence sources, 16 are deployed along
the coast from Seattle, Washington to Eugene, Oregon, while five (5)
more lie between Eugene and Eureka, California. All of these are
within 20 miles of the shoreline.
I’ve already explained in detail the connection between this
radioactive chemical warfare and the Swine Flu hoax being
perpetrated by the United States Government, particularly in monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 17. Therefore it is significant that
the so-called Swine Flu inoculation program was halted with great
publicity two days ago owing to death and paralysis suffered by many
who have taken the vaccine. This serves to focus the nation’s
attention once again on the terrible threat Swine Flu is said to be
just at a time when the Soviet submarines are once again prepared to
inject a poison into our atmosphere that can produce severe flu-like
symptoms. It may be that, as was done the past two times, the Soviet
submarines will wait for another announcement from the United States
Government that it will serve as a cover story, such as a Chinese
nuclear test, before releasing the plutonium into our air. But now
they have acquired some experience and it is possible that they will
release the plutonium at any time.
Meanwhile the build-up for war continues. While the mounting Soviet
threat to Europe is fraying the nerves of NATO Defense Ministers,
the most immediate threat to Europe is once again emerging in the
Middle East. In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 over a year ago I
revealed the over-all plan that existed at that time for war to
begin in the Middle East. I ask you now to listen to that AUDIO
LETTER No. 6 again. All is nearly ready once again for the long
planned war in the Middle East to be ignited. The Rockefeller oil
interests now have gotten most of their money out of the Arab
region. Now the title to all the oil fields have been sold to the
Arabs themselves.
The Middle East war will also leave the United States in an even
more defenseless position that we are now in if the Soviet surprise
attack on our country is allowed to take place.
CONTINUING THREAT OF SOVIET UNDERWATER MISSILES PLANTED WITHIN AND
NEAR UNITED STATES BORDERS
Last month I explained in detail why the
underwater missiles that are being planted along our shores by the
Soviet Union are so crucial to them in their plan to defeat the
United States in NUCLEAR WAR ONE, but I also explained that they are
no longer being removed by the United States Navy.
Since I recorded that tape, 57 more nuclear missiles have been
planted in our own territorial waters. Added to the 36 I mentioned
last month, this brings the total to 93 Soviet missiles in the
waters of the United States including Alaska and Hawaii. In
addition, four (4) missiles still threaten the Panama Canal, and
five (5) more missiles now threaten Canada. I declared last month
that I would no longer reveal the locations of these missiles unless
and until responsible arrangements are made to inform the public of
the deadly threat we are under. Our Secret Rulers had been using my
information from October 1st onward only for their own benefit—and
that is not what it is for.
I intend to continue to hold my silence until action is taken for
everyone’s benefit. Nevertheless I am going to make one exception at
this time—it involves Hawaii. World War II began with a devastating
surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and now no less than nine (9)
Soviet underwater missiles now threaten Pearl Harbor and the Island
of Oahu with the same fate a second time. I will now give the
coordinates for these nine missiles only, in hopes that this time
action will be taken to protect the United States Pacific Fleet from
the attack that could come at any moment. These coordinates are:
Missile #1:
21 degrees/13 minutes/47 seconds
North
157 degrees/46 minutes/28
seconds West
Missile #2:
21-18-37 North, 157-57-21 West
Missile #3:
21-17-31 North, 158- 4-17 West
Missile #4:
21-21-19 North, 158- 9- 7 West
Missile #5:
21-36-12 North, 158-12-48 West
Missile #6:
21-36-33 North, 158-11- 6 West
Missile #7:
21-26-54 North, 157-47-17 West
Missile #8:
21-19-27 North, 157-38-36 West
Missile #9: About 25 miles east of Oahu and 8 miles north of
Molokai at 21-21-13 North, 157-15-26 West.
I continue to hope, my friends, that a
war can still be prevented. To find out what you can do in the event
war does come, I suggest you read issue 135 of McKeever’s
Multinational Investment and Survival Letter, 1012 Russell St.,
Baltimore, MD 21230, but my prayer is that you will never need that
kind of information.
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
|