| 
			  
			
 
  by Garikai Chengu
 October 19, 2014
 from 
			GlobalResearch Website
 
 
			
 
				
					
						| 
						Garikai Chengu is a 
						research scholar at Harvard University. Contact him on 
						garikai.chengu@gmail.com |  
			
 
			  
			  
			  
			 
			  
			
 This week marks the three-year anniversary of the Western-backed 
			assassination of Libya's former president, Muammar Gaddafi, 
			and the fall of one of Africa's greatest nations.
 
 In 1967 Colonel Gaddafi inherited one of the poorest nations in 
			Africa; however, by the time he was assassinated, Gaddafi had turned 
			Libya into Africa's wealthiest nation. Libya had the highest GDP per 
			capita and life expectancy on the continent. Less people lived below 
			the poverty line than in the Netherlands.
 
 After
			
			NATO's intervention in 2011, Libya 
			is now a failed state and its economy is in shambles. As the 
			government's control slips through their fingers and into to the 
			militia fighters' hands, oil production has all but stopped.
 
 The militias variously local, tribal, regional, Islamist or 
			criminal, that have plagued Libya since NATO's intervention, have 
			recently lined up into two warring factions. Libya now has two 
			governments, both with their own Prime Minister, parliament and 
			army.
 
 On one side, in the West of the country, Islamist-allied militias 
			took over control of the capital Tripoli and other cities and set up 
			their own government, chasing away a parliament that was elected 
			over the summer.
 
 On the other side, in the East of the Country, the "legitimate" 
			government dominated by anti-Islamist politicians, exiled 1,200 
			kilometers away in Tobruk, no longer governs anything.
 
 The fall of Gaddafi's administration has created all of the 
			country's worst-case scenarios:
 
				
					
					
					Western embassies have all left
					
					the South of the country has 
					become a haven for terrorists
					
					the Northern coast a center of 
					migrant trafficking 
			Egypt, Algeria and Tunisia have all 
			closed their borders with Libya. This all occurs amidst a backdrop 
			of widespread rape, assassinations and torture that complete the 
			picture of a state that is failed to the bone.
 America is clearly fed up with the two inept governments in Libya 
			and is now backing a third force:
 
				
				long-time CIA asset, General 
				Khalifa Hifter, who aims to set himself up as Libya's new 
				dictator.  
			Hifter, who broke with Gaddafi in the 
			1980s and lived for years in Langley, Virginia, close to the CIA's 
			headquarters, where he was trained by the CIA, has taken part in 
			numerous American regime change efforts, including the aborted 
			attempt to overthrow Gaddafi in 1996.
 In 1991 the New York Times reported that Hifter may have been one 
			of,
 
				
				"600 Libyan soldiers trained by 
				American intelligence officials in sabotage and other guerrilla 
				skills… to fit in neatly into the Reagan Administration's 
				eagerness to topple Colonel Qaddafi". 
			Hifter's forces are currently vying with 
			the Al Qaeda group Ansar al-Sharia for control of Libya's second 
			largest city, Benghazi.  
			  
			Ansar al-Sharia was armed by America 
			during the NATO campaign against Colonel Gaddafi. In yet another 
			example of the U.S. backing terrorists backfiring, Ansar al-Sharia 
			has recently been blamed by America for the brutal assassination of 
			U.S. Ambassador Stevens.
 Hifter is currently receiving logistical and air support from the 
			U.S. because his faction envision a mostly secular Libya open to 
			Western financiers, speculators, and capital.
 
 Perhaps, Gaddafi's greatest crime, in the eyes of NATO, was 
			his desire to put the interests of local labour above foreign 
			capital and his quest for a strong and truly United States of 
			Africa.
 
			  
			In fact, in August 2011, President 
			
			Obama confiscated $30 billion from Libya's Central 
			Bank, which Gaddafi had earmarked for the establishment of the 
			African IMF and African Central Bank.
 In 2011, the West's objective was clearly not to help the Libyan 
			people, who already had the highest standard of living in Africa, 
			but to oust Gaddafi, install a puppet regime, and gain control of 
			Libya's natural resources.
 
 For over 40 years, Gaddafi promoted economic democracy and used the 
			nationalized oil wealth to sustain progressive social welfare 
			programs for all Libyans.
 
			  
			Under Gaddafi's rule, Libyans enjoyed , 
				
					
					
					free health-care 
					
					free education
					
					free electricity 
					
					interest-free loans 
			Now thanks to NATO's intervention the 
			health-care sector is on the verge of collapse as thousands of 
			Filipino health workers flee the country, institutions of higher 
			education across the East of the country are shut down, and black 
			outs are a common occurrence in once thriving Tripoli.
 One group that has suffered immensely from NATO's bombing campaign 
			is the nation's women.
 
			  
			Unlike many other Arab nations, women in 
			Gaddafi's Libya had the right to education, hold jobs, divorce, hold 
			property and have an income. The United Nations Human Rights Council 
			praised Gaddafi for his promotion of women's rights.
 When the colonel seized power in 1969, few women went to university. 
			Today, more than half of Libya's university students are women. One 
			of the first laws Gaddafi passed in 1970 was an equal pay for equal 
			work law.
 
 Nowadays, the new "democratic" Libyan regime is clamping down on 
			women's rights.
 
			  
			The new ruling tribes are tied to 
			traditions that are strongly patriarchal. Also, the chaotic nature 
			of post-intervention Libyan politics has allowed free reign to 
			extremist Islamic forces that see gender equality as a Western 
			perversion.
 Three years ago, NATO declared that the mission in Libya had been,
 
				
				"one of the most successful in NATO 
				history." 
			Truth is, Western interventions have 
			produced nothing but colossal failures in
			
			Libya,
			
			Iraq, and
			
			Syria.  
			  
			Lest we forget, prior to western 
			military involvement in these three nations, they were the most 
			modern and secular states in the Middle East and North Africa with 
			the highest regional women's rights and standards of living.
 A decade of failed military expeditions in the Middle East has left 
			the American people in trillions of dollars of debt. However, one 
			group has benefited immensely from the costly and deadly wars:
			
			America's Military-Industrial-Complex.
 
 Building new military bases means billions of dollars for America's 
			military elite.
 
			  
			As Will Blum has pointed out, 
			following the bombing of Iraq, the United States built new 
			bases in, 
				
					
					
					Kuwait
					
					Bahrain
					
					Qatar
					
					the United Arab Emirates
					
					Oman 
					
					Saudi Arabia 
			Following the bombing of Afghanistan, 
			the United States is now building military bases in, 
				
					
					
					Pakistan
					
					Kazakhstan
					
					Uzbekistan 
					
					Tajikistan 
			Following the recent bombing of Libya, 
			the United States has built new military bases in, 
				
					
					
					the Seychelles
					
					Kenya
					
					South Sudan
					
					Niger 
					
					Burkina Faso 
			Given that Libya sits atop the strategic 
			intersection of the African, Middle Eastern and European worlds, 
			Western control of the nation, has always been a remarkably 
			effective way to project power into these three regions and beyond.
 NATO's military intervention may 
			have been a resounding success for America's military elite and oil 
			companies but for the ordinary Libyan, the military campaign may 
			indeed go down in history as one of the greatest failures of the 
			21st century.
 
 
  
			 |