| 
			  
			  
			
 PART TWO
 
 
			  
				
					
						| 
						Summary: Suppose you are 
						under occult siege from....real daemons. If you’re into 
						Christian tactic, you might think that love-bombing will 
						make "them" open their eyes until they see their error. 
						Is this about to work? If not, what can you do about it 
						anyhow? And, why did Whitley Strieber feel love despite 
						he was just tortured by his astral enemies? 
						 
						  
						Find out 
						everything about love that you didn’t know before! 
						Reveal the truth about negative propaganda from 
						channeled sources, and head into the proper antidote: 
						Real Initiated Understanding! One of the best spiritual 
						texts ever!  |  
			  
			  
			Love Was All He Said
 
 The alternate convention to which a certain "New Age" mentality 
			turns whenever the possible existence of an actual, deliberate 
			negativity approaches the unimpeachable, is that of the vaguely 
			"Christian" tactic: love-bomb the blighters until they see the error 
			of their ways, by the point-scoring Good Example set. Such 
			cheek-turning is in practice of course a very selective espousal, 
			since it rarely seems to constitute the day-by-day business attitude 
			of the very same proponent. Even in the case however that this 
			recommendation weren’t outright hypocrisy, it would remain fatally 
			fatuous; for, as the RA entity proclaims to one of the questioners 
			who presented just such a tidy "solution", they (the Orions) "do not 
			want your love".
 
 This rebuff clearly meant that any "love-rays" directed toward the 
			zones of Conscious or Spiritual Negativity would find nothing 
			receptive on which to fall, no substance upon which to work. The 
			inescapable implication was that any such proposal, suitable enough 
			perhaps for beings of a straight 3rd-demity consciousness not 
			decisively polarized and therefore still possessing a "recessed 
			trait" of potential goodness able to be acted upon, when applied 
			toward Spiritual Negativity of the Higher Densities simply served as 
			clear indication that its proponent hadn’t understood the point.
 
 The Negativity of the Higher Densities is ipso facto awake; it has 
			chosen the rejection of other-love as a whole-being orientation, and 
			therefore has no subconscious residuum of receptivity that might 
			secretly "respond" to the good intentions of a positively-directed 
			beam (even if such a beam proceeded from a sincere resolve which 
			consistently applied its Samaritan counsel in all other avenues of 
			life).
 
 Indeed there is deeper implication than this. In the face of such 
			uncommon or truly spiritual negativity the presumption of such 
			conventional counsel (applicable enough at the ordinary level) might 
			well result in consequences worse than simple "lack of success". It 
			has to be understood that spiritual principles and religious 
			precepts, even those cherished from long use and universal 
			recommendation are at best optimum advice for the given system of 
			function, at the transition to general 4th-density existence, those 
			precepts and principles most apparently "eternal truths"—as they 
			stem alike from Buddhism and Hinduism, Christianity and 
			Sufism—have 
			to be evaluated against an enlarged context, and modified according 
			to the forms of information "unique" to the higher domains to which 
			consciousness must adapt.
 
 The principle to "love one and all alike", to bestow "blessings upon 
			all beings" and so forth is not subject to abandonment at this 
			stage; we are not to somehow understand that a reversion to hatred 
			and warfare are suddenly "all right" due to the extenuating 
			circumstance that "pure spiritual evil does indeed exist". Universal 
			Love is and always remains the principle in some proper form; but 
			the specific beaming of the "love-vibe" in the direction of the 
			Orion Crusaders not only possesses the defect of wholly wasted 
			effort; the philosophy informing it tends to contribute to a 
			tremendous misreading of the elements actually involved. And this is 
			no better illustrated than in the Strieber account of the manner in 
			which he was made to feel tremendously guilty for not having obeyed 
			a direct command of his tormentors.
 
 
			  
			 
			  
			
			Sweet Setup
 
 In  Transformation he recounts the otherworldly interdiction whereby 
			a "voice" bade him refrain forever from sweets, his one true vice.
 
			  
			
			Addicted as he was, Strieber couldn’t stop, even though the "beings" 
			engineered circumstances so as to bombard him with dire 
			implications. As a result, one evening he is visited by a malevolent 
			presence which he himself—as always—describes best, i.e. as, 
				
				"monstrously ugly, so filthy and dark and sinister. Of course they 
			were demons. They had to be."  
			
			Again,  
				
				"the sense of being infested 
			was powerful and awful. It was as if the whole house were full of 
			filthy, stinking insects the size of tigers".  
			
			The entity, rising up 
			beside his bed like a "huge, predatory spider", places something at 
			his "forehead" (i.e. the Third Eye) and with an electric tingle he 
			is "transported" to a dungeon-like place where his attention is 
			fixed upon a scene of excruciating torture. The victim, a 
			normal-looking though quite naked man, is being whipped to shreds 
			amidst agonized screams by a cowled figure. His "entity" explains to 
			him that "he failed to get you to obey him and now he must bear the 
			consequences". This disclosure is followed by a very interesting and 
			significant "assurance" that "it isn’t real, Whitty, it isn’t real." 
			As Strieber reports, such an "admission" did nothing to mollify his 
			horror. 
 The assurance was indeed an oblique reference to the actual tactic 
			being used by his tormentors, the whole scene, like so much 
			UFO-abduction data, is a projected thought-form. Such thought-forms 
			are generated not in or through our ordinary "3rd-density" plane, 
			but are manufactured in the medium proper to them, i.e. the Astral! 
			The subject, then, is either spirited to the "vibratory frequency" 
			of that density through dissociation of the astral vehicle from the 
			physical, or, as in certain accounts possessing a component of "high 
			strangeness" the 4th-density menstruum is tuned into place by a 
			vertical adjustment and wholesale realignment of the nested 
			"bodies", in such a way that the subject doesn’t dissociate from the 
			integument of "touch" (and thus, from the physical-electric grid) 
			but rather undergoes the rotation of the coordinates of that grid so 
			that they line up in conductive relation to the informing geometries 
			of astro-etheric patterning which otherwise are obliquely screened— 
			thus affording a direct continuity of perception surcharging the 
			apparently "preserved", familiar field of physical focus with 
			impossible Whitley-in-Wonderland elements.
 
 The purpose of soothing Strieber with such assurance as to the 
			ultimate unreality of the convincing scene experienced, should be 
			familiar to anyone who’s heard of the torture tactics employed in 
			any good Banana Republic (i.e. those in which the victim is 
			subjected to excruciating pain on the one hand while being 
			simultaneously stroked and reassured on the other, often by the same 
			party). The object is to elicit the full cooperation of the victim 
			under duress, by making him instinctively gravitate toward the 
			implicit salvation extended through the "motherly" touch 
			demonstrated in that schizoid Grasp, feeling some surcease and thus 
			even affectional Gratitude with respect to that one factor in the 
			whole horrible stew that seems to proffer kindness and a relieving 
			recourse.
 
 Indeed, Strieber proves himself the compliant guinea pig, even under 
			the intelligence that it’s all a thought-form, his compassion for 
			the (imagistically dramatized) unsuccessful "bidder" persists, 
			obviously in thorough confusion with his own self-commiseration, so 
			that finally he collapses upon a repentant love for the very roaches 
			that bedevil him.
 
				
				"Again, though, I felt love. Despite all the 
			ugliness and the terrible things that had been done, I found myself 
			longing for them, missing them! How was this possible?". 
				   
				Again, "I 
			regretted the contempt I had shown for its [the other "reality’s"] 
			needs and its laws and felt a desperate desire to make amends". 
				   
				"I 
			had felt a pain greater than the pain of punishment. It was the pain 
			of their love. I had the sense that they had on my behalf turned 
			away from perfect love, and that they had done this to help me ".
				   
				"I 
			suspect that the ugliness I had seen last night was not them, but 
			me! I was so ashamed of myself that I almost retched". 
				 
			
			In this way we may clearly see the baited hook that awaits within a 
			context inclusive of life in the higher densities, with respect to 
			the word of universal-indiscriminate love. The effort to operate 
			such love according to a literal interpretation of the word, is ripe 
			to be employed as a real booby trap for any form of consciousness 
			having as yet no practical grasp of the Whole, and so by virtue of 
			standard habits of identification chronically confounding the Whole 
			and the part (as is the typical pattern of 3rd density mind).  
			  
			
			Unable 
			to "see" the Whole which nonetheless directly infuses and 
			underscores the negative entities as their very medium, clinging to 
			their foulness like a sweet masking scent, the mind used to dealing 
			only in terms of the representative part is unusually open to making 
			just that identity-equation in which the incidental expression of a 
			Field is presumed to contain that field, or is taken as one-to-one 
			equivalent of the quality belonging to the field as a whole. 
			Conversely, the return of the Love -value toward any being of such a 
			field isolated out of the context of the Whole, tends—to the mind 
			chronically focused only on the complex relation of part to 
			psychological part and never on the Whole itself—to be but a 
			yielding or block submission to the other’s requirements as means of 
			overcoming the resistance of "identification". 
 
			  
			  
			
			To the Highest Bidder
 
 Should there remain a reluctance to grasp this point, or some desire 
			to conserve the liberal-humanistic proposal to which Strieber often 
			turns (i.e. , to call such things truly Negative or Evil is 
			"simplistic", you know) we need merely resort to the 
			Ra material 
			once more, wherein we find a passage—first published in 1981, don’t 
			forget— that anticipates Strieber’s account by years and furnishes a 
			framework before the fact which not only fits the 
			Strieber-entities’ behaviors like a key a lock but gives us a needed 
			perspective of evaluation.
 
 On page 21 of Volume III, 
			The Law Of One, the Ra entity 
			characterizes a prototypical tactic of the Orion Crusaders, that of 
			"bidding", "bidding" is described in such a way as to make it clear 
			that Strieber’s experience represents a concrete instance of the 
			phenomenon, a factual case history with which to footnote Ra’s 
			words. "Bidding" is a contest of will, serviceable in determining 
			the pecking order of the social-memory-complex of the Crusaders, and 
			in rendering the general run of consciousness enslaved through 
			intimidated compliance of its own free will. It is a command of 
			obedience, precisely such as that issued without explanation against 
			Strieber’s lust for sweets. Its sole purpose is to bend the subject 
			into accepting the command, the actual content of the order being 
			largely beside the point (other than the degree of difficulty 
			involved for the subject according to the strength of the tendency 
			to be overcome, a factor which redounds to the polarization of the 
			"bidder").
 
			  
			We find further that any failure to exact conformance in 
			"bidding" results in a proportional loss of negative polarity to the 
			aggressor, a situation which the entity must then attempt to 
			rectify. In this way we see that, in terms of the higher densities 
			not only are "thoughts things", but the metaphorical relations 
			characterizing the order as which beings functionally interact 
			possess distinct energy values, and have a direct bearing on degree 
			and intensity of polarization-alignment. To possess a legion of 
			"servants" in these subtle regions is an actual nourishment to the 
			centers and systems, a kind of psychic "food-chain pyramid". 
 At this point a pure bolt of recognition should allay any further 
			doubts, either of the type which question the factuality of 
			Strieber’s accounts or the kind that equivocate as to the actual 
			nature of the entities involved, for we find the Strieber entity 
			virtually paraphrasing the earlier Ra recitation re the modus 
			operandi that identifies the Negative polarity, in its suggestion 
			that the failure to exact obedience on the part of the imagized 
			"Crusader" bears punishable consequence. Not only is this 
			"narration" of the visualized scene an adequate admission of the 
			terms involved, for those with prior knowledge as is supplied by the 
			Ra description, it is a continuing illustration of the way in which 
			the Negative polarity extorts the desired obedience — and thus soul 
			capture — through manipulation of the Love value belonging impartially 
			to the psychic plane through which this largely takes place.
 
 What then are we to "do" with the counsel of the general Teaching 
			thus far delivered to this density, such as that of "love thine 
			enemy?" How are we to interpret such a precept or indeed understand 
			the principle of Love altogether, when its application seems so 
			susceptible to a sticky, spider web ambush from planes of reality 
			actually eager with invitation for so innocent an approach?
 
 
			  
			  
			
			Love Was All He Said
 
 At this point it’s important to understand the way in which a 
			spiritual truth is necessarily reflected into zones of adaptation. 
			Principles applicable to one density of consciousness aren’t just 
			outmoded and put aside upon "stepping up" to another density. It may 
			however be necessary to identify the form in which such a principle 
			is recast, according to requirements of a density nearer in direct 
			spirit to the Truth which it expresses. In this sense, from a 
			perspective that may be characterized as "4th density", the 
			appropriate disposition of the Love-nature which serves it most 
			perfectly on all occasions is that of whole hearted Love of the "One 
			Infinite Creator".
 
 We may of course readily recognize this "higher truth", it is none 
			other than the Shema of Israel, which Jesus identified with the 
			heart of the Law. If then the first spiritual precept to "Love God 
			with all your heart" is a familiar reference of 3rd density 
			consciousness, how is it that such a framework possesses it? And how 
			does such a reference coexist with corollary commandments and 
			encomiums, i.e. precisely those such as "love thine enemies", "love 
			your neighbor as yourself," etc ?
 
 The general rule, "Love God", reaches alike to every density, for it 
			is in its essential character the spontaneous outpouring of the 
			Truth of Life apart from any formulation or customized tailoring. 
			Thus the 3rd density freely receives it, just as any other, 
			regardless the functional state of understanding. At the 3rd-stage 
			level of egoic self-reference, such a rule incarnates through 
			abstract conceptual distortions practically screening direct 
			cognition of that Whole which is the real referent of the rule. In 
			order that such a rule be functionally operative and lived according 
			to its spirit, a level of mind-body integration and harmony is 
			required that abuts the threshold integrity of a "4th density", for 
			such a (minimal) state of unitive coherence is able to surpass 
			identified allegiance to the ego-divisive verbal mind, thereby 
			settling into congruence with the actual holism that informs it as 
			reflective expression of the Holism of the Creator.
 
 It is through such holistic grasp that the undivided Love of the 
			Creator is received as the constitutor of all centrist reference, so 
			that such a composed self-center may in full awareness ascribe that 
			Love-value to its true Giver, faithfully returning the Gift. 
			Where—as in the ordinary state of 3rd-density consciousness—this 
			cannot be done directly owing to the prohibitively low level of 
			mind-body integration and harmony, Compassion-incarnate adjusts the 
			means to suit the available material. Thus a relatively indirect 
			instruction is necessarily given, one which compassionately takes 
			into consideration the actual compass of comprehension practically 
			available.
 
 The "holism" of Self and Creator is functionally masked at 3rd 
			density level by the compulsive allegiance of the (potential) 
			whole-value of identity in one-to-one equations of identification 
			with the preferential profile of the ego-inventory, thus the advice 
			to "love thine enemy" may be understood as very practical strategy 
			meant to extend the I. D. beyond its contractile, lopsided 
			self-enclosure into a more unified resolution recognizably 
			encompassing polar terms as facets of a single Being. It’s suited 
			strictly to a level of functioning which is not able to proceed 
			directly from a grasp of the Whole, but must attempt to approach the 
			Whole through comparative inference.
 
 Such a compromise adaptation of the primary rule, while it may serve 
			well enough at its level as a rehearsal, shows precisely why it was 
			a stop-gap measure progressively less viable in very practical ways 
			as consciousness approaches the plane at which the Law operates 
			through self-evident values and direct qualities.
 
 When the general level is raised at which the Love-teaching is 
			received, the relative inefficiency of its previous level of 
			reception becomes apparent, the possible pitfalls and menial snares 
			of that reflected, siepped-down viewpoint emerge like serpents and 
			spiders from the rocks when the open invitation to take on the 
			higher responsibility of a more profound level of existence at the 
			same time discloses conditions revealing the defect of lesser 
			adaptations, and making mortal the dangers of persisting to identify 
			a whole and indivisible Value with fragmentary phases or preferred 
			parts.
 
 When (in adaptation to the more direct Influence of Truth infusing 
			the higher densities) we learn the whole-being expression of Love as 
			that spontaneous Love of the One Infinite Creator, the very essence 
			of Love tends to emanate impersonally as a global value, spreading 
			without effort or special address to all quarters where it’s 
			received or not according to the specific will of every form. In 
			this way its Presence doesn’t become confused with the conditional 
			presence of the myriad beings "positive" or "negative".
 
			  
			Nor does its 
			Presence become confounded with the mechanics of "give and take", 
			which are all relative identifications of the mind (look again at 
			what befalls Strieber in his mental efforts to specify the 
			love-value he felt lurking in the worst of circumstances, notice the 
			manner—common to the complex of 3rd-stage psychology that accepts 
			the teaching of Love according to its lights—in which he winds the 
			skein of complicated love-strands through a conceptual miasma of 
			"owes" and "oughts", bewildered by just those ordinary terms of 
			psychic bookkeeping). 
 
			  
			  
			
			The Portrait of Dorian’s Grays
 
 When considering the extraordinary deception woven about the 
			circumstances of such abductions as Strieber’s, we may wonder how it 
			is that the entities involved don’t simply use their obvious powers 
			of illusion to mask their awful character, for in all the captious 
			play-of-mirrors produced in relation to the principle of love, the 
			actual ferocity and venomous character of the Crusaders seems to 
			spring irrepressibly forward, thus in a sense almost requiring a 
			tremendous expenditure of energy and time toward bullying some 
			interpretation that belies the painfully obvious. The answer to 
			this, also shows succinctly the real nature of the phenomenon with 
			which we are dealing.
 
 The origin and informing character of these entities is, 
			self-evidently, that of the density corresponding to (what 
			esotericism knows as) the astral plane, and what esotericism knows 
			of the astral plane clearly accounts for the transparency of their 
			basic presentation, which, as we’ve noted, calls for an overlay of 
			psychic subterfuge. The Law governing astral existence, requires the 
			exteriorization of basic character in identifiable symbolic terms. 
			All "form" in its astral origin wears its heart symbolically on its 
			sleeve. It is for this reason that a physical object of apparently 
			neutral character such as a knife, when perceived astrally may 
			distort in dream-fashion into a recognizably malevolent entity, 
			assuming a distinct persona in the manner of anthropomorphized 
			objects in a Silly Symphony.
 
 The Strieber entities give the overpowering impression of 
			malignancy, because that is their character; and by extending their 
			essentially psychic, 4th-density being into physically perceptible 
			range, they are merely spreading the compulsive "honesty" of the 
			self-symbolizing Astral medium into twilight structures visible to 
			eyes of flesh.
 
			  
			
			(Such spontaneous, symbolic exteriorization 
			functioning much like the Portrait of Dorian Gray, becomes 
			progressively less reliable as an index of "moral valuation" the 
			higher up the scale of densities we ascend; thus the luminous, 
			angelic white entity Strieber encounters as a kind of harbinger of 
			death in Transformation does not qualify by appearance as a positive 
			manifestation. It is of the Negative along with all the others, but 
			it is a relatively rare presence in the corpus of the Strieber 
			account, since it emanates from the 5th density of creative Mind. 
			 
			  
			Thus it represents in its appearance the 
			power to conceive and 
			govern whole patterns of exteriorization.
			
			The Ra material discusses 
			just this capacity of the 5th density Negative adepts to assume so 
			fair a shape, and in fact the likelihood is altogether greater that 
			higher-density entities either positive or negative who manifest in 
			more "pleasing" human terms are 5th density beings able to modulate 
			the matter of visible appearance according to inner conceptual 
			requirements, rather than merely being able to regulate it from a 
			point past its primary patterning and projection). 
 
			  
			  
			
			Speaking With Forked Tongue
 
 It is for this reason of direct symbolic disclosure that the 
			Negative hierarchy often finds more efficient means of dissimulation 
			in the channeling phenomenon, for here, there is no direct encounter 
			or condensation to "visible appearance", but only the medium of the 
			word to be interpreted according to the recipient’s lights. The mode 
			of expression is by that measure indirect and the Negative beings 
			have therefore a greater latitude of deception at their disposal.
 
 Since the Negative is altogether, in one sense, an inverse 
			reflection of the Positive or True Creative Logos, a parallel 
			configuration borrowing all its components by simple reversal and 
			distortion, it proceeds by the method of imitation. It apes the 
			expression of the positive, the more meticulously where it wishes to 
			be mistaken all together for the positive so as to subvert the 
			message for those who tend to abide by it. Its typical strategy is 
			to adhere so closely to the letter of the positive as to be 
			virtually indistinguishable to all but initiated awareness, 
			installing itself through the rhythmic lull of entrainment so as to 
			catch the "congregation" totally off guard when it diverges slightly 
			or greatly from pattern and so pulls a portion of the positive track 
			along with it.
 
 The voice of the Negative is of course the more ingratiatingly 
			imitative where the inclination of the recipient is already to the 
			positive; a negative receptacle requires no such precaution.
 
 Even in the case of channeling, however, the character of the Astral 
			origin compels the insinuation of a sign, a kind of confessional 
			signature no matter how subtle. Indeed this trait of the 
			communication is often accepted as a device of mockery suited to the 
			character of the source, it is played with as a defiant means of 
			asserting the true identity of the Signal, hiding it in plain 
			symbolic sight in conformance with "astral" requirements.
 
 This law which insists even the physical form exhibit "some sign or 
			characteristic which identifies" the "true essence", is indeed 
			remarked upon by one such channeled source, the 
			
			Hilarion Material. 
			Hilarion is an entity identified in both the "Christ" materials of 
			V. Cssene and the Ra channelings, as a being of the positive 
			Hierarchy. Thus when we see books on the shelf bearing the Hilarion 
			moniker we automatically respond with a beam of recognition. Hilarion’s 
			’channel’ (Maurice B. Cooke) seems decisively predisposed 
			to the Christian stream of positive teaching, so we are not 
			particularly surprised when the second half of The Nature of Reality 
			(which had up to then been a so so account of "esoteric physics") 
			breaks into a frenzied description of the imminent apocalypse. 
			Indeed, the book ends with a graphic account of destruction and the 
			final torment of souls as they are beaten to their knees in 
			extortion of a "repentance" and "turning to God" which they’d 
			apparently been reluctant to make even when melting into one 
			another.
 
 This stomach churning peroration was no accident, for in another
			Hilarion volume, the source proclaims that the structure of the book 
			held been deliberately designed with the "Armageddon" last so as to 
			attract a particular type of "select" readership.
 
 
			  
			  
			
			My, What Big Eyes You Have...
 
 With an eye, then, to the Ra account are the way in which the Orions 
			have traditionally sought to subvert the positive messages and 
			meanings of persons or events through emphasizing moods of doom and 
			destruction, making such negativity a central feature of the 
			communication thus deflecting attention into brooding byways of 
			despair, we may turn to the Hilarion account of the existence of 
			Negative Beings (or the Dark Brotherhood, in the terms of this 
			source). According to Hilarion’s account, the Negative is allowed to 
			exist because its minions act in the ultimately helpful and healthy 
			capacity of predators that only decimate the "diseased" ranks, i.e. 
			like wolf attacking the sick or congenitally weak specimens of 
			caribou (Hilanon’s analogy).
 
				
				"The wolf attacks these defective 
			caribou, and would never think of wasting its energy trying to chase 
			or bring down healthy specimens. By weeding out the weaker ones, the 
			wolf ensures that the healthy remains strong.    
				"With this edifying 
			version of Christian Darwinism, we are comforted into the notion of 
			our constitutional safety (considering the readership of such a work 
			to be ipso facto amongst the Elect, an assurance "we" were already 
			given in the gross-out discussion of Armageddon).  
			This encouraging information hardly tallies with the outright attack 
			which the Orions launch upon the Ra channelers in the very midst of 
			their activity (see books II, III and IV, 
			The Law of One), nor does 
			it square well with what initiated knowledge otherwise knows about 
			the effort of the Negative to attack, discredit or physically 
			eliminate those who are quite positively polarized and in no way 
			"defective" in the arrogant sense that the Hilarion material 
			proposes. It is also more than passingly interesting to note that in 
			the film
			Wolfen taken from Whitley Strieber’s book of the same name, the 
			behavior of the predatory creatures is rationalized in precisely the 
			same way, i.e. that they are simply weeding out the decrement of 
			mankind thereby ultimately strengthening the total stock (the fact 
			that one of the "good guys" who even subscribes to this 
			interpretation and is in no way depicted as "defective", is 
			nonetheless wantonly massacred by the creatures, attests to 
			Strieber’s early powers of schizophrenic dissociation, and gives us 
			as well certain cause to look more deeply into the character of the 
			Hilarion idea). 
 
			  
			  
			
			100 Many Plots Spoil the Cooke
 
 When we read on that the Dark Brothers are allowed to "test" a 
			channel such as Cooke (apparently alluding to an early channeling 
			incident that must have been a source of some distress) by making an 
			agreement of exchange with the "White Brotherhood", each bargaining 
			some "deal" or concession from the other, we are squarely on 
			Donald 
			Trump territory and about as far away from the facts of the 
			polarities and the densities as we can possibly be.
 
			  
			(The "Hilarion" 
			rationalization here is almost self-evidently a cover story, meant 
			to assuage Cooke more than anything else, for initiated 
			understanding does recognize that a Negative source, having attached 
			to a positively disposed channel, will push the negative hypothesis 
			into increasingly more overt expressions in order to determine how 
			much the malleability of the subject will yield to directly negative 
			propaganda! Apparently at one point Cooke must have been pushed too 
			far, and this absurd scenario was manufactured to explain the 
			cordially adversarial relations whereby the Positive and Negative 
			players of the higher realms use the channeler’s "inner instrument" 
			like a Border land pari-mutuel window). 
 When we read further along how to identify the interference of the 
			"Dark Brotherhood", we presently realize we are being disabused of 
			the Seth teaching (although of course that teaching isn’t 
			specifically named due to the punctilious observation of that 
			"Cosmic Law governing the operation of these testing factors"), 
			Hilarion’s objection, revealingly enough, has to do with the 
			"impropriety’ of explaining cosmic truths of simultaneity and 
			probability to the anthill focus of physical consciousness, which 
			should be properly stuck with the mea culpa considerations of karmic 
			consequences, thus "Hilarion" neatly pivots us back into proper 
			alignment with all those conventions of cultural conditioning that 
			chronically lock us in place as a mechanical unit of cause and 
			effect, and away from the elastic efficacy of the present poised at 
			the juncture of potential change!
 
 Finally, Hilarion regales us with the assurance that all "galactic 
			observers" within the "region of Earth" are necessarily
			friendly, 
			contrary to the misleading teachings which would have us believe 
			otherwise.
 
				
				"There is the suggestion that some are distinctly alien 
			and even hostile, and that certain of these beings kidnap humans and 
			kill animal life for experimental purposes".  
			To disabuse us of this 
			base less notion, "Hilarion" resorts to no less than the old canard 
			about the inability of any civilization in the galaxy to develop 
			interstellar technology until such time as it decisively overcomes 
			all negative inclination (!) Thus any close encounters, sightings, 
			landings or interactions of a third or fourth kind are necessarily 
			conducted only with the kindliest and most positive of beings. 
 
			  
			  
			
			Flying With Expired License
 
 It is precisely here that those most glaring of contradictions 
			indicative of the channeling phenomenon become inflamed, and 
			virtually force themselves upon our notice right along with a 
			virtually self disclosing hypothesis that accounts for them. For the 
			Ra material specifically warns that Confederation sources (with very 
			few exceptions) refrain from any but long distance exposures, 
			generally only in order to extend the range of mankind’s inquiry 
			toward renewed consideration of the Unknown, and almost never effect 
			that kind of encounter known as "landing". Landing has become the 
			almost exclusive resort of the Orions, the Negative Beings. Thus, 
			virtually all "close encounters", reports of abduction etc. are of 
			the manifestly negative type. Despite his composed rationalizations, 
			Strieber’s emotional declarations continue to ring in our cars, and 
			the material gathered into such sources as those of Budd Hopkins, 
			certainly have little of the aura of "good will" about them.
 
 Then just what could this "counsel" of the Hilarion material 
			possibly mean? It seems only too evident from this as well as other 
			"revelations" of the teaching, that the "Hilarion" source
			conforms 
			to the methodology of the Crusaders as disclosed in the Ra Material, 
			i.e. that of close adherence to the style, thought and content of 
			positive sources so as to sneak in "undercover" as it were, and at 
			the point of greatest vulnerability—when the subject is set at his 
			ease and off guard—pour the venom of disinformation in the audio 
			channel!
 
			  
			
			(We should be interested to know that "false teachers" can 
			be identified by their appearance, whether they’re too fat or too 
			thin, whether they look as if they can be trusted and—oh yes, 
			whether they’ve "ever been hounded through the courts, or banned 
			from any country"—an interesting criterion, considering such an 
			ostensibly "Christian" source. Perhaps the governmental persecution 
			of true Teachers is a phenomenon confined to the old Roman past ).
			
 Taking all this together, we may now identify the very emphasized 
			oratory of the Hilarion material on page 26 of Dark Robes, Dark 
			Brothers
 
				
				"Specifically, by asserting that one should love one’s 
			enemies, Christ presented the single most effective way to overcome 
			the temptations of Earth life and to confound the whisperings of the 
			Dark Brotherhood".  
			
			Interesting that of all the possible teachings 
			and enlightening words of the Christ, this material should go out of 
			its way to emphasize the one expression which is most subject, in 
			such a context, to the distortions of 3rd density thinking patterns! 
			For of all the possible teachings that might effectively have been 
			drawn upon, the one which lends itself most readily to the snares of 
			the Negative poachers is precisely this precept, presumed by a 
			mind-body complex insufficiently unified in congruence with the 
			conscious axis to make the necessary 4th density transference from 
			the psychological structure where such imperatives come to lodge, to 
			direct alignment with the unitive Ground of Being from which love 
			streams naturally in all directions without entrapping concern for 
			"friend or foe". 
 
			  
			  
			
			I’m Sorry - Do You Have Any Credit Cards?
 
 Finally, there was the case of a student of the initiated teaching 
			who, finding the cover signature on the Hilarion books quite 
			intriguing by virtue of its consistent entwining of the heels of the 
			letters "L" and "A", decided to apply a Qabala of numbers whereby, 
			lo-and-be-hold - he determined that the deliberately emphasized 
			letters clearly spelt "LA" which in Hebrew means "nothing" or 
			"zero". Since Zero is alphabetically an "O", his eyes automatically 
			transposed that letter over the "LA" on the cover signature and, 
			much to his amazement, one of those clever "astral" disclosures 
			sprang forward, of the type that shows the natural compulsion of the 
			medium to reveal its character symbolically (as well as the perverse 
			delight taken by the Negative in coding its identity in plain 
			sight): HI ORION.
 
			  
			(Some of the book covers indeed expressly separate 
			the letters H and I from the rest, which are arranged to touch one 
			another so as to group the "LARION" with its entwined 
			L and A in one 
			bundle).  
			  
			Indeed the contents of "Dark Robes" etc. (a book, remember, 
			about the negative beings) pointed to its own clue in declaring that 
			even all physical things bore the symbolic signature of their 
			particular source. 
 
			  
			  
			
			This Is Not the Behavior Of an Ordinary Kitchen Appliance
 
 It is necessary to note that the growing public presence of 
			"negative" literature (i.e. books overtly or unknowingly inspired 
			from spiritually-negative sources) is not just the mild circumstance 
			of a "democratic distribution" of diverse information. The presence 
			of such material is not innocuous, nor is its active component 
			confined to the personal imbibitions of content. It is not in the 
			contents alone
			that such media carry their infectious messages. Everyone reading 
			this review section should take to heart the real lesson contained 
			in the incident reported by Strieber in Transformation, i.e. that of 
			the psychiatrist who
   upon seeing the cover of the book felt 
			compelled without knowing its contents to purchase it, the next day 
			being greatly surprised to hear a number of patients report dreams 
			of UFO abductions for the very first time. 
			  
			
			It is revealing that the 
			covers of both Strieber’s books depict the alien countenance of his 
			abductor, for in Communion (click image 
			left) we learn that the entity actually modeled 
			for Strieber at the interior space of his "third eye", specifying 
			that it wanted the artist who would transcribe the description to 
			get it right!! 
 To initiated understanding this clearly shows that the 
			accurately-rendered image was to be used as a kind of talisman, or a 
			material basis for the manifestation of that force-influence to 
			which it corresponded.
 
 Stneber gives vent once or twice in Transformation to the sentiment 
			that, if he really thought the creatures with which he was dealing 
			were negative or harmful he could not in all conscience expose 
			people to what was clearly a powerful and unpredictably commanding 
			influence. He should have held on to that thought. He should have 
			made every effort to penetrate the shallow rationalization by which 
			he "forgives himself for his recalled participation, in youth, as 
			the apparent ringleader of the "children’s circle" whose job it 
			apparently was to lure acquaintances out into the haunted woods of 
			night where presently, amidst the horrified shrieks of many, they 
			would find themselves face to face with something unspeakable.
 
 In addition to Strieber’s books, there is a motion picture of 
			Communion soon to be released, as well as a spate of other movies 
			already primed for the competition that purport to depict true-life 
			alien encounters. These should not be considered ordinary modes of 
			entertainment. They must be understood as vehicles, very potent 
			types of imagistic "talisman" supplying the material basis for a 
			mass manifestation of unprecedented character. We need to listen 
			more closely than ever now, to a channeled source that dates back to 
			1957, for in 
			
			The Secret of the Andes (by Brother 
			Philip - George Hunt Williamson) we find a corroboration of the 
			Ra source which predates that communication by many years, in which 
			it is specified by name that 
			
			we are under invasion by the
			Orion 
			Empire.
 
 It is necessary to understand this for what it is, and not treat it 
			as a removed spectator witnessing another phenomenon of mass 
			entertainment. Everyone is involved, and there are children present. 
			As was indicated, in last month’s review titled Movie and Dream, the 
			Qabalah of Star Wars, motion pictures have a profound correspondence 
			with and influence upon the dream psyche, owing to the structure of 
			the medium. That harbinger of the "Freddie" films, in which there 
			arises an incursion into waking consciousness of the terrible 
			content of dream and nightmare such that they are presently 
			confounded and inextricably entwined, is poised to take place "in 
			reality" the same as it was prefigured on film. In the specific 
			instance of the Strieber books it is very advisable to neither buy 
			nor read them, and this not the expression of some "censorship of 
			content". There is something else going on altogether, something for 
			which the public, in its wildest dreams, is scarcely prepared. It is 
			advisable that the new films such as Strieber’s dealing with UFO 
			abduction etc be given a wide berth, and certainly children should 
			be kept away from them! They are not just "spooky" movies, good for 
			Halloween-type thrills.
 
 This is not an easy month for your reviewer. The decision to advance 
			this discussion and extend such difficult, goblin-ridden counsel has 
			not been made lightly. But the truth should at least be put out, out 
			on the bookstall floor or street-corner along with every other 
			conceivable kind of information in the endless bid for the ephemeral 
			attention of this place. What people choose to do with it, is a 
			whole other column.
 
 But do it we must, and did. This is the ghostbusters boys, your 
			cover is blown and your time’s at hand.
 
 ET, go home.
 
 
			 
			Go Back
 |