from TimeVehicle Website

  • Fig. A1. The Magnocraft.

  • Fig. A2. Various flying arrangements and configurations formed by magnocraft.

  • Fig. A3. Scorch marks left on the ground by landed UFOs.

  • Fig. A4. The eastern edge of the Tapanui crater where UFO vehicles exploded in 1178 AD.

  • Fig. A5. Examples of underground tunnels evaporated in rocks by UFOs.

  • Fig. B1. The 550 million year-old imprint of human foot.

  • Fig. B2. An old church painting portraying the Crucifixion of Jesus supervised by UFOs.

  • Fig. C1. The little white being with blue eyes holding the pyramid.

  • Fig. C2. A photograph of the pyramid described here.

  • Fig. C3. The internal design of the pyramid described here.

  • Fig. D1. The electrical circuitry (connections) of the pyramid described here.

  • Fig. D2. A revealing device.


Fig. A1. The magnocraft



Illustrated is the appearance, design, and operation of a single magnocraft of the smallest type, called the K3 type, for which the factor K=D/H takes the value of K=3. As it was formally proven that “UFOs are already operational magnocraft” some readers could have seen this vehicle, only that they would call it a UFO.

  1. A cut-away view of the magnocraft type K3, illustrating its internal design and main components. On this diagram, the front shell of a horizontal flange was removed to illustrate the location of side propulsors. The vehicle is shown as if approaching a landing on flat ground. The edges of the walls made of a material impenetrable by a magnetic field are indicated by a broken line. The cuttings through the walls from a material penetrable to a magnetic field are shown with a wavy line.

    Symbols: M -the spherical main propulsor whose repulsion “R” from the environmental magnetic field produces a lifting force (note a cubical twin-chamber capsule visible inside); U - one of the eight side propulsors whose attraction “A” towards the environmental magnetic field stabilizes the vehicle; N,S - north and south magnetic poles; I -inclination angle of the environmental magnetic field; 1 - the crew cabin in the shape of a parallel-piped ring; 2 -one of the four telescopic legs extended at the moment of landing.

  2. The side appearance of the magnocraft. This vehicle resembles an inverted saucer. Its propelling devices take the form of spherical “propulsors” which in magnocraft of the first generation host cubical twin-chamber capsules. The magnocraft type K3 has a single lifting propulsor located in its centre, and eight stabilizing propulsors placed in its side flange, all nine of them loaded with magnetic energy.

    These propulsors are arranged like a parabolic mirror in a torch. Therefore an explosion of these propulsors would create a directional impact, similar to that formed by anti-tank cumulative charges. Because this vehicle always flies with its central axis parallel to the local course of Earth’s magnetic field, its explosion must create a characteristic “butterfly” area of destruction, existing both in Tapanui and Tunguska - see Figure A4.

  3. A device, which is the main component of every “magnetic propulsor”. It generates a powerful pulsating magnetic field used by magnocraft (and UFOs) to propel themselves. In magnocraft of the first generation this device is composed of two cubical “oscillatory chambers”, one bigger and one smaller, each one of them working like a powerful “electromagnet” which utilises electric sparks to generate pulsating magnetic field. Both oscillatory chambers are then combined together thus forming a device called the “twin-chamber capsule” which is the major component of every magnocraft’s propulsor (a magnetic propulsor is basically a twin chamber capsule enclosed in a spherical casing and supplied with steering devices which point the magnetic field into a required direction).

    Such a twin-chamber capsule contains two oppositely oriented oscillatory chambers placed one inside of the other. Because of the need for free floating of the inner (I) chamber suspended inside of the outer (O) one, the side edges “a” of both oscillatory chambers fulfil the equation: ao=ai×Ö3. The resultant magnetic flux ® yield to the environment from such a capsule is obtained as a difference between outputs from both its chambers having opposite orientation of poles. The twin-chamber capsule allows full control over all the attributes of the produced magnetic field. Symbols: O - outer chamber, I - inner chamber, C -circulating flux trapped inside the capsule, R -resultant flux yield from the capsule to the environment.

Fig. A2. Six different classes of flying arrangements formed by magnocraft (and UFOs)

Each of these is formed through the magnetic coupling together of a number of disk-shaped vehicles (mainly magnocraft type K3 are illustrated here). The differences between individual classes result from the kind of propulsors which cling to each other in the coupled spaceship (e.g. main to main, main to side, or side to side), magnetic interactions between these propulsors (e.g. attraction or repulsion), and the type of contact between the vehicles (e.g. steady, labile, or no contact at all). The diagram illustrates:

  1. Physical flying complexes. These remain in stable contact, while all their propulsors attract each other. Shown above is a cigar-shaped flying complex formed when several vehicles of the same type are stacked one on the top of other like a pile of saucers in the kitchen cupboard. Apart from this arrangement, class #1 includes: (a) spherical complexes (formed by two vehicles which cling to each other by their bases), (b) double ended cigars (formed from two cigars coupled like a spherical complex), and © fir-tree complexes (formed when vehicles of different types are stacked one on the top of the other).


  2. Semi-attached configurations. Formed when magnocraft/UFO have only a labile contact (e.g. obtained when two vehicles are joined by their spherical domes) and their side propulsors repel each other. The black bars joining the propulsors oriented attractively towards each other are columns of powerful magnetic field which traps the light.


  3. Detached configurations. These appear when coupled vehicles do not touch each other physically, but are kept in a permanent configuration due to the equilibrium of repelling and attracting forces produced by their propulsors (the square black bars joining twin-chamber capsules from side propulsors are columns of powerful magnetic field).


  4. Carrier platforms. These are formed when vehicles of a smaller type cling under the side propulsors of a “mother ship”. (Shown are four K3 type vehicles attached to a K5 type mother ship.)


  5. Flying systems. Formed when a number of cigar shaped complexes couple together with their side propulsors.


  6. Flying clusters. These are formed through touchless sideways coupling of a number of arrangements or single vehicles into a kind of flying train. Illustrated is a “flying cross”. Magnetic circuits which separate (repel) subsequent vehicles are shown with broken lines. Apart from these, there is a number of coupling (attractive) magnetic circuits, not marked in this illustration but described in [1/3].

Fig. A3. Scorch marks left on the ground by landed UFOs

(Upper drawings) The dependence of the shape of landing site from the height (hx, hy, hz) at which a single magnocraft hovers. The illustrated shapes are typical for the following situation: the base of a single vehicle is parallel to the surface of the ground, the axis of the main propulsor is parallel to the central axis of the vehicle, the position of the vehicle is upright, the magnetic circuits are spinning. When any of the above factors change, the shape of the landing site must also alter.

  1. The shape of marks formed when the height of hovering (hx) is greater than the critical span (hc) at which the central column of main magnetic circuits (M) separates into two loops. The upper part shows vehicle’s magnetic circuits: central ©, main (M), and side (S). In the lower part of the drawing the landing site scorched by these circuits is shown. The distinct features of this site are two concentric rings: the outer having the maximal diameter “do” close to the nominal diameter “d” of the vehicle, and the inner ring with the inner diameter “di”. The corrective equation for this landing takes the form: d=do+di.


  2. A mark scorched when the vehicle hovers at height “hy” which is smaller than “hc” but larger than the span “hs” of the side circuits. Note the outer ring of diameter “do” (smaller than “d”) and a patch with the intensive centre “da”.

  3. Concentric rings scorched when a given vehicle landed on its base, or hovered at a height “hz” smaller that span “hs” of side circuits. In this case the inner diameter of the outer ring is equal to the outer diameter D of the vehicle.

(Lower photographs) Photographs of landing sites formed in New Zealand by single UFOs, which illustrate all three main cases presented in the upper drawings.

  1. A K3 type UFO landing with two concentric rings formed in 1988 in a silage paddock of Mr Geoff Genmell (Horse Range Rd, No 2 R.D., Palmerston, New Zealand). The diameters are do=2.1 and di=1 [m] (thus d=do+di=3.1 [meters]).


  2. A K3 type UFO landing found in the morning, on 6 December 1978, in a paddock of Mr Barry Badman (Wrights Bush, No 8 RD, Invercargill, New Zealand). Note the central patch scorched by the column of the field from the main propulsor displaced to the right of the site (in reality towards the magnetic south direction). It touches the outer ring.


  3. A fragment of the paddock with over a hundred of UFO landings. It belongs to G. Derek George (Waimarie, Amberley, North Canterbury, New Zealand). Here UFOs landed on their bases to take on the deck sheep grazing at that paddock.

Fig. A4. The Tapanui Crater


This huge explosion site measuring 900x600x130 metres, was formed on 19 June 1178 in the Otago province of New Zealand. It is located on the private property of Mr Rex L. Hellier (Pukerau, 1 R.D., Gore, New Zealand; tel: -64 (3) 205-38-64). The evidence suggests that it was produced when around seven UFOs type K6 (time vehicles), stacked together into a cigar-shaped configuration (similar to the configuration shown in part #1 of Figure A2), exploded top-to-bottom close to the ground with a yield of over 70 megatons of magnetic and telekinetic energy.


The Tapanui Crater is the second location (after the site of the famous Tunguska Blast of 1908 in Central Siberia, USSR) identified so-far where UFOs have exploded.

  • (top) The eastern section of the Tapanui Crater, photographed from the northern end. The curved slope in the top left of this photograph represents the Crater’s most spectacular side, as the western edge rises only a few meters from the lower part of Pukeruau hill. A fully-grown pine tree visible in the centre of this frame well illustrates the slope’s maximal depth. Another, more distant pine tree visible on the top of Pukeruau hill, provides an identification land-mark for people visiting this Crater.


  • (bottom-left) Shape of the Tapanui Crater (coordinates: 46°04’S, 169°09’E). The similarities existing between the configuration of this crater and the Tunguska blast site certify that the origin of both sites is analogous, i.e. from a powerful near-ground (aerial) explosion of several UFO vehicles stacked into a cigar-shaped flying configuration. Notice the evident correspondence (labelled 1 to 5) in:

    1. the relationship between the apical angle of triangular entries to both sites and their distance from the nearest magnetic pole of Earth (i.e. at the moment of explosion the Tapanui Crater was located much closer to the magnetic pole then the Tunguska Site, thus its apical angle is also much wider),

    2. the manner explosion shockwaves entered the ground,

    3. the breaking points of the explosion shockwaves (which in Tunguska swirled tree trunks, whereas in Tapanui formed large sand dunes),

    4. the location of the centre of explosions and the paths followed priori by both UFO vehicles,

    5. magnetic meridian orientation of the sites, etc. Symbols: SG/NG - geographic south-north direction, SM/NM - magnetic south-north direction.

  • (bottom-right) Shape of the Tunguska blast site (coordinates 60°55’N, 101°57’E) charted in 1958 (the 1958 Tunguska chart outlines only the area of total taiga destruction, while later maps also areas of sporadically fallen trees). Symbols: O - centre of the explosion, F - range of scorched trees, P - path followed by the UFO vehicle prior to the explosion, as reported by eye witnesses, L - range of trees felled by the shockwaves of the explosion (their trunks point at the centre of the explosion).


Fig. A5. Examples of underground tunnels evaporated in rocks by UFOs


Note that large caves evaporated like these tunnels inside of lone, landscape dominating hills are used by our cosmic parasites even today as their underground bases for hiding UFO vehicles, for resting, and for carrying all more labour consuming abductions from the area dominated by these hills.

  1. The Cocklebiddy Cave on the Nullarbor Plain in Western Australia. So far about 6 kilometres of this straight, elliptical tunnel, directed exactly south-north, have been investigated, in spite that the most of this length is flooded with water. Colour photographs are published in the Australian magazine People, December 5, 1983, pages 8 to 10.


  2. Photograph of around one third of length of the Deer Cave from the Mulu National Park in Northern Borneo. This tunnel was evaporated by UFOs type K8. Shown is the southern entrance currently used by tourists. The ceiling of Deer Cave towers around 120 meters above the apparent floor.


  3. A triangular, east-west oriented, magnetized tunnel hundreds of kilometres long, discovered in the Province of Morona-Santiago of Ecuador by Juan Moricz in June 1965. The above photograph is reproduced by the kind permission of Erich von Däniken, from his book “In Search of Ancient Gods” (Souvenir Press, England, 1973, ISBN 0-285-62134-3, page 341).


  4. Principles involved in the formation of such tunnels, explained by the Theory of the Magnocraft and illustrated as if the ground were transparent. The final shape of these tunnels (i.e. elliptical or triangular) results from the requirement that the base of a saucer-shaped vehicle must all times remain perpendicular to the force lines of the local magnetic field.

    1. A the evaporation of the tunnel by the spinning plasma cloud from magnocraft magnetic whirl. It cuts the hard rock like a huge circular saw. Symbols: 1 - the magnocraft, 2 - the whirling disk of vehicle’s magnetic circuits, 3 -the evaporated rock decompressing itself along the tunnel, 4 - the rock rubble which lies at the bottom of the tunnel.

    2. A breach formed by the highly compressed vapours expanding to the surface.
      Symbols: 5 -the dispersed droplets of evaporated rock, 6 -the crack in the native rock formed by highly compresses gases which push towards the surface.

    3. Elliptical-shaped tunnel produced by a magnocraft flying in a north-south direction.
      The shape of this tunnel results from the circumferential cross-section of the discoidal vehicle which evaporated it.

    4. Triangular-shaped tunnel formed during magnocraft flights in an east-west direction.


    The shape of this tunnel results from the axial cross-section of the discoidal vehicle which evaporated it. Symbols: 7 - the smooth, glossy walls with bubbles, 8 - rough and craggy apparent floor surface, 9 porous “stony bridge” which covers the rock rubble, 10 - rubble of native rocks which buries the true floor of the tunnel, 11 - water that accumulates under the apparent floor, 12- the true floor of the tunnel, 13 - range of thermal and magnetic changes of the rock, I - inclination angle of the Earth’s magnetic field (which defines the slanting of the magnocraft during flight).


Fig. B1. The imprint of human foot which is around 550 million year-old


It was found west from a small township Delta in Utah state of the USA. In 1968 the late Bill (William) Meister was hunting for “trilobite” fossils. Widely known in the USA deposits of these fossils are located west from this Delta township. When he split layers of rocks in search of these fossils he almost got petrified from a shock - in one of layers he encountered the imprint of a human sole. This shoe even had a heel.


The imprint shown here was examined by Mr Evan Hansen (HC 76 Box 258, Beryl, Utah 84714, USA). Hansen was a person specially qualified for this research, because 11 years of his life he spend as a shoe repairer in a shoe repairing shop, while for 7 years was a manager of this shop. According to his words, this imprint tells its own story. Without any doubt it is an imprint of a human shoe. Whoever made it was the same human as is every person who today is walking on our planet.


On the basis of his experience Mr Hansen guarantees chances are zero that this imprint is anything other then the imprint of a human shoe.

According to the analysis of Mr Hansen, the imprint shows the right leg. This is obvious from a metatarsal bulge at the base of the big toe. Also the heel is worn at the outer edge, exactly the same as modern humans firstly wear their heel on the outer edge. The owner of this shoe was builded the same as Mr Hansen (168 cm tall?), as the shoe is 10¼ inches long (26 cm), its sole is 3½ inches wide (9 cm), while the heel is 3 inches wide (7.5 cm) and ¼ inches thick (6 mm).


The mud cracked on toes when the wearer of this shoe pushed it backwards to made a next step. In turn around the heel the mud was tired and lifted after it stack to the shoe. During the formation of this footprint its heel stepped on one of first trilobites -i.e. creatures that most probably were then farmed on Earth and inspected by the owner of this shoe. After being stepped on, the trilobite curl up in protection, in a manner as modern bugs would curl if injured. Other trilobite was pushed in mud around toes.

Trilobite lived in the mid-Cambrian era, that means around 550 millions years ago in conventional dating. They were used to life in very hostile environmental conditions in which other organisms were not able to survive. Therefore trilobite are the first organisms on Earth which form permanent remains. In layers which precede this period, only bacteria, algas, and other low forms of life could be found.


Therefore the imprint of a human shoe is made in the oldest Earth rock which still contains the permanent remains of living organisms - in this case trilobite. This in turn provides a conclusive proof to the history from subsection B2 that life on Earth was artificially replenished by cosmic farmers who also farm us. It also proves that the civilization which planted us on Earth is at least 550 millions years more developed then us, and that so long ago it already mastered interstellar travel.

Bill Meister died in 1980s. The original place of finding this shoe imprint was carefully hidden by him (probably in the effect of a telepathic suggestion from UFOs), while the location of this place was recorded on the film in which his wife indicates with her finger the exact location of the imprint on the background of recognisable landscape (this photograph is already lost). The ideas was that this location could be found if a scientific expedition is ever organized (further old human imprints still should be present in this place).


In 1999 Mrs Meister donated the imprint to “Creation Research Museum”, P.O. Box 309, Glen Rose, Texas 76043-0309, USA (located at: 3102 F.M. 205, Glen Rose); Web site: <http//>. Let us hope that UFOnauts do not manage to destroy it silently, as they have done it with other evidence on their occupation of Earth.


Fig. B2. An old church painting which seems to suggest that the Crucifixion of Jesus was supervised by UFO vehicles


This particular painting originates from the Orthodox cathedral Sweti Cchoweli in Mcchecia -the former capitol of Georgia (Gruzja). It was painted around 1650 by an anonymous artist. It is reproduced on Figures 60 to 62, and described on page 158, of the book [1FigB2] by Walter-Jörg Langbein, entitled “Syndrom Sfinksa” (the original title: “Das Sphinx-Syndrom. Die Rückkehr der Astronautengötter”) published in Poland, Warszawa 1997, by Wydawnictwo Prokop, ISBN 83-86096-32-2, pb, 190 pages.


The picture is representative to the increasing body of evidence that all vital events on Earth, including important religious events, were at least supervised, if not caused, by our cosmic parasites.

for more information, 'click' above image


Therefore UFO vehicles were observed not only during important battles, catastrophes, and social unrest occasions, but also on numerous religious occasions. An excellent selection of around 12 church paintings which captured UFO vehicles, is presented in the article [2FigB2] by Daniela Giordano “Gothic Discs & Renaissaucers” published in “Fate”, September 1999 issue, pages 26 to 31. Note that on the painting shown above, the enlargement of both UFO vehicles presented on lower Figures 61 and 62 reveals the faces of our cosmic parasites who carefully watch the Crucifixion of Jesus.

It should be noted that these two UFO vehicles illustrated on the above painting actually are a traditional feature in many icons from orthodox churches that depict the Crucifixion of Jesus. For example, near the small New Zealand town named Masterton there is the only Greek Orthodox Church of that country, constructed around the year 1980. Richly painted walls of this church, amongst others, include also the scene from Crucifixion of Jesus. This scene also shows stylised UFO vehicles very similar to these illustrated above.


Fig. C1. The little white being with blue eyes shown while holding the pyramid


This illustration was prepared by Daniela herself, on 30 March 2000. The painting illustrates the appearance of the being whom disclosed the pyramid to Daniela. Note the shape and size of his head when compared to proportions of remaining parts of body, his small nose, little chin, slit mouth, and no hair. Especially note the contented happiness that is emanating from his face (in subsection B4 a state of permanent happiness achievable through the moral living is called “nirvana”).

The painting also shows the exact shape and relative size of the pyramid, as well as the manner it was held by the being. The colour scheme of the pyramid’s surface, as well as shadows and illustration of walls’ transparency, is conveying the impression that Daniela got when looking at the working pyramid.


Fig. C2. A photograph of the pyramid


Shown is a prototype of this device built in Poland, but not made operational. More details about the purpose, operation, and theory behind this device is provided in treatise [7], in chapter G of monographs [3] & [3/2], as well as in chapter N of monographs [1/2] & [1/3].

Research on the prototype completed by Daniela indicated that after an alternating current of high frequency is supplied to the device from an external source (e.g. from a radio) the pyramid produces some kind of telepathic signal. However, her prototype still hides some construction errors which make it impossible to operate according to the original specification of the giver. To eliminate these errors, further theoretical research and physical development needs to be carried out.

  • (Top) The side view of the whole pyramid. The device is held by myself (Dr Jan Pajak) in a manner similar as the little being with blue eyes held it in his hands. During such holding the biofield of the user infiltrates through the active space of the device. Because this bio-field carries the thoughts of the user, it modifies with these thoughts the state of the optical interference cavity. In turn the modifications of this optical interference cavity are imposed onto the electrical oscillations from the pyramid’s resonator, thus modulating these oscillations.

    After the modulation into magnetic vibrations these thoughts are emitted into space from which they can be intercepted by another similar device. After being intercepted these thoughts are demodulated and superimposed on the biofield of another user, thus appearing in his/her mind as another set of thoughts imposed on his/her own.

  • (Bottom) The inner components of the pyramid. The casing (hat) is visible from underneath after being put aside on the right.

Fig. C3. The general shape, design, and main components of the pyramid


This illustration is prepared as if all the elements were transparent, i.e. through subsequent components the elements, shapes, and connections placed behind them are visible. It represents a repetition of Figure N2 from monographs [1/3] and [1/2], and Figure 1 from treatise [7].

This device is shaped as a pyramid of around 27.5 [cm] high. Its wiring and main components are hermetically enclosed inside a pyramidal casing made of perspex or glass. The casing hosts: a copper frame (F) shaped like a pyramid and aligning each corner of the casing, a conical coil © also made of a copper wire, four aluminium disks (D1), (D2), (D3), (D4) attached to the side walls of the pyramidal casing - one of them (D1) should have a small hole in the centre, quartz crystal (Q) placed at ¼ of the height, phial (T) placed in the centre of the base, two inductors (I1) and (I2), and four cascades of mirrors (M1), (M2), (M3), (M4) placed in four corners of the base. All these components should not touch each other, although they should be electrically connected together according to the original instruction.


Their electrical properties should fulfil the condition of “harmonic” proportions.

The phial (T) should be half filled with ordinary kitchen salt, half with mercury. It is recommended that it should work under a vacuum. Both inductors (I1) and (I2) are made of small bar magnets with copper wiring tightly winded around them. Each cascade of mirrors (M) is made of three small mirrors of descending heights. The copper frame (F) is simply eight pieces of copper wire joined together so that they form the shape of a pyramid. It is recommended that the whole pyramid should be under a vacuum.


Fig. D1. The electrical diagram which illustrates the basic circuits and connections existing in the pyramid


It is reproduced from Figure N3 of monograph [1/3]. The continuous lines indicate the connections that were described to Daniela in the original disclosure. The broken lines indicate electrical connections which were not included in the original disclosure, but the existence of which is explained by theories described in chapter D of this treatise (chapter D explains the phenomena, principles, and basic circuits involved in the pyramid’s operation).


The below diagram illustrates my knowledge about the operation of this device at the time of writing this treatise (the further theoretical research which I continually carry out, combined with experiments which hopefully will be inspired by this treatise and may be completed by readers, in future may introduce some improvements to this diagram).

Names of subsequent components of this pyramid are reflecting the use of this device as a telepathyser. The corresponding names of the same components for the operation of the pyramid as a telekinetic battery are explained in subsection D2.4. The pyramid is composed of the following main circuits and individual components: (1) receiving antenna for telepathic waves. It is composed of the quartz crystal (Q) placed in the focal point of the telepathic resonance cavity that is formed from four aluminium disks (D1, D2, ... D4). (2)


The modulating and demodulating circuit (resonator - R). It is composed of such components as inductors (I1) and (I2), a glowing tube (T), and a vacuum capacitor. The capacitor is formed out of two types of “plates” (which differ in shapes), separated from each other with a layer of vacuum (or air). The first of these “plates” is formed from four aluminium disks (D1, D2, ... D4) connected together.


The second “plate” of the capacitor is formed from a conical coil © and a frame (F) connected to it. In order to increase the communicativeness of this diagram, the resonator circuit is marked with a dotted line ®. (3) The optical interference chamber/cavity which functions as an “inouter” for thoughts. It is composed of: a glowing tube (T) and not shown here four cascades of mirrors (M) which cooperate with this tube. (4) Emitting antenna which forms the telepathic waves and sends them throughout counter-world. It has a shape of a conical coil ©.


Fig. D2. A revealing device. It represents a simplified, self-defense version of telepathic telescopes


Such devices, if completed, would enable us to see our cosmic parasites which so-far successfully were hiding from our sight by entering a state of telekinetic flickering. More thoroughly the design of this device is described in treatise [7B].

A state of telekinetic flickering is accomplished by switching on a sequence of fast pulses of the telekinetic field. Each such a pulse is turning the object that is wrapped into this field into a transparent energy pattern or cloud. But between these pulses the object remains material and visible. Therefore, if such a flickering is fast enough, the object becomes unnoticeable for our eyes, similarly as in our motion pictures the flickering of individual frames becomes invisible for us. But each pulse of the telekinetic field can be intercepted by the device showed here, and revealed as a glowing shape. Therefore the revealing device illustrated here allows us to see normally invisible UFOnauts and their vehicles.


They appear as glowing figures at the device’s electromagnetic screen (s).

As this is the case with optical telescopes, also the revealing devices are composed of a main tube (t), on which all other components are to be assembled. At the frontal part of this tube a focusing magnetic lens (f) is assembled. At the rear part of the same tube the viewing magnetic lens (v) is assembled. In a simplified, self-defence version of the telepathic telescopes called here “revealing devices”, such lenses (f) and (v) are simply permanent magnets (or permanent electromagnets which use DC).


In centre of the tube an electromagnetic screen (s) is formed - see the dotted plane extending across the tube (t). This screen is composed of a collision surface and the athwart electrostatic field. The collision surface (s) is formed by the two magnetic fields bumping into each other with their magnetic poles (O) which represent an “outlet” for flow of counter-matter (for the notation of magnetic polarity used by present physicists: O=N).


The athwart electrostatic field which is spreading from two thin electrodes (e) extending along the peripherals of the collision surface and placed at the opposite side of the tube (t). The whole interior of the tube must be filled up with an extraction glow generating substance (g).

Back to Contents






Appendix Z1

List of illustrations of the treatise [7/2] “Pyramid of thoughts” (ISBN 0-9583727-1-3)

Because copies of this treatise [7/2] are to be available via Internet, where the inclusion of illustrations may pose a technical problem, in this listing of illustrations additional information is provided which indicates which of the publications listed i chapter G also contains a given Figure (most of publications listed in chapter G was supplied to the National Library of Poland, to all libraries of province capitols in Poland, and also to the main libraries of almost all higher education institutions in Poland, not mentioning similar libraries in New Zealand and in several other countries outside Poland).


For example the symbol [1/3]-F1 means that a give illustration is also included into the monograph [1/3] as Figure F1. The use of symbol ~ indicates either an older version of the same illustration, or illustration very similar, while the use of symbol ¨ indicates a colour print of a given photograph. Note that in the following pairs of monographs very similar illustrations were used: [1/2] & [1/3], [3] & [3/2], [5] & [5/2], [5/3] & [5/4], [6] & [6/2]. Also the Polish and other language versions of the same publications have identical illustrations, e.g.: [5/2] & [5/2E], or [7], [7E] & [7I].

Treatise [7/2] includes 29 illustrations, which in the printed versions of this treatise are arranged into 12 Figures, a title page, and 2 “about the authors” pages. In Internet each of these illustrations is available as a separate item. Symbols assigned to individual illustrations/items reflect their location on a given Figure. Thus illustrations the symbol of which includes letter “H” are placed in the higher row of a Figure, while illustrations with letter “L” are placed in the lower row of a Figure. Within a given row, symbols “l, m, r” mean the location on left, in the middle, or on right.


In turn symbols “a, b, c”, or “1, 2, 3, 4”, indicate a writing-type order within a given Figure.

  • Fig. A1. The smallest Magnocraft - type K3. [4B]-B1, [5/2]-19, [5/4]-G2, [1/3]~F1, [6/2]-10,

    • (A1a) General design and components of K3 type Magnocraft. [1/3]-F1, [1E]-B1, [1I]B1, [3/2]~H1,

    • (A1b) Side view of the smallest magnecraft type K3. [1/3]-F1, [1E]-G4, [1I]-G4, [5/4]-G2,

    • (A1c) Twin-chamber capsule composed of two oscillatory chambers. [1/3]-C5, [1E]-F4, [1I]-F4, [2]C4, [3/2]-F5,

  • Fig. A2. Flying arrangements formed by magnocraft. [1E]-G6, [1I]-G6, [2]-D3, [3/2]-H3, [5/3]-F5, [6/2]-12, [4B]-B2,

  • Fig. A3. Scorch marks left on the ground by landed UFOs.

    • (A3H) Connection between a vehicle’s height and a shape of landing site. [1/3]-F33, [1I]~G38, [5/2]-23, [5/3]-F3,

    • (A3L) Photographs of landing sites scorched by single UFOs. [1/3]-P1, [5/2]~33, [5/3]~G9,

    • (A3Ll) Two concentric rings. [1/3]-P1, [1E]-M7/H, [1I]-K1, [5/2]-33ª, [5/3]-G9, [5/4]-H9a,

    • (A3Lm) A ring with central scorching. [1/3]-P1, [1E]-M2/H, [5/2]-33b, [5/3]-G9, [5/4]-H9b,

    • (A3Lr) A ring with a flange. [1/3]-P1, [5/2]-33c, [5/3]-G9, [5/4]H9c,

  • Fig. A4. The Tapanui crater where around 7 UFO vehicles exploded in 1178 AD. [1/3]-P4,

    • (A4H) A photograph of the Tapanui crater’s eastern slope. [1/3]-P4, [1E]-M19d, [1I]¨K4/L, [5/2]2, [5/3]-A2, [5/4]-A2,

    • (A4L) Comparison of similarities between Tapanui and Tunguska. [1/3]-P5, [1E]-M30, [5/2]-8, [5/3]-C6, [5/4]-C6

  • Fig. A5. Examples of underground tunnels evaporated in rocks by UFOs. [1/3]-P6, [5/2]~32, [6/2]~21, (#1-#3) Photos of tunnels evaporated in rocks by UFOs. [1/3]-P6, [4B]-B4,

    • (A5_1) Cocklebiddy Cave, Australia. [1E]-M18, [1I]¨K3/1, [5/2]-32/2, [5/3]-G8, [6/2]-21/2, [4B]-B4b,

    • (A5_2) Deer Cave, Borneo, Malaysia. [1/3]-P6, [4B]-B4/L,

    • (A5_3) Tunnel Morona-Santiago, Ecuador. [1E]-M17, [1I]¨K3/2ª, [5/2]-32/1, [5/3]-G8, [6/2]-21/1, [4B]-B4a,

    • (A5_4) Principles of formation of underground tunnels by UFOs. [1/3]-F31, [4B]-B3, [1E]~G36, [1I]~G36,

  • Fig. B1. The 550 million year-old imprint of human foot. [1/3]-O32,

  • Fig. B2. An old church painting on the Crucifixion supervised by UFOs. see description under Fig. B2,

  • Fig. C1. The little white being with blue eyes holding the pyramid. this illustration is unique for [7/2],

  • Fig. C2. A photograph of the pyramid described here. [1/3]-N1, [3/2]-G1, [5/3]-F8, [7]~2,

    • (C2H) Dr Jan Pajak holding the pyramid. [1/3]-N1, [3/2]-G1, [5/3]-F8, [7]~2,

    • (C2L) A photograph of the pyramid’s interior. [1/3]-N1, [3/2]-G1, [5/3]-F8, [7]~2,

  • Fig. C3. The internal design of the pyramid described here. [1/3]-N2, [3/2]-G2, [7]-1,

  • Fig. D1. The electrical circuitry (connections) of the pyramid described here. [1/3]-N3, [3/2]-G3, Fig. D2. A revealing device. [7B]-1/H.

Independently from Figures listed above, treatise [7/2] uses also one drawing on the front page which represents a repetition of illustration from Fig. C1, and also includes passport-type photographs of both authors included into descriptions from chapter H “About Authors”.


Back to Contents