| 
			  
			  
			
			
  by Mike Adams
 
			the Health RangerJune 04, 2010
 from 
			NaturalNews Website
 
			  
			  
			  
			Health freedom has just been handed a significant victory by the 
			United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which 
			ruled last week that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 
			violated the First Amendment rights of a nutritional supplement 
			company when it censored truthful, scientifically-backed claims 
			about how selenium can help reduce the risk of cancer.
 See the ANH announcement at:
			
			
			http://www.anh-usa.org/court-finds-for-anh-usa-in-stunning-victory-over-fda-thank-you-jonathan-emord/
 
			
			Essentially, the FDA applied its doctrine of censorship to these 
			selenium supplements in the same way it oppresses truthful and 
			scientifically-supported health claims across all dietary 
			supplements.
 
			  
			
			The purpose of the FDA's censorship of truthful 
			information about the health benefits of dietary supplements, as NaturalNews readers already know, is to keep the American people 
			nutritionally illiterate and protect the profits of the 
			pharmaceutical industry.
 In this court case, ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH, et al. vs.
			KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al., the judge ruled that the FDA violated the 
			First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs by restricting their free 
			speech about the anti-cancer benefits of their selenium supplements.
 
 As explained by health freedom attorney Jonathan Emord who argued 
			the case before the Court:
 
				
				"The decision... reaffirms that FDA is subject to the strictures of 
			the First Amendment in its evaluation of health claims and it faults 
			FDA for failing to follow that standard, holding its suppression of 
			the selenium-cancer risk reduction claims unconstitutional." 
			Emord goes onto explain: 
				
				"The Court concludes that the FDA... has not provided any empirical 
			evidence, such as 'studies' or 'anecdotal evidence,' that consumers 
			would be misled by... plaintiffs' claims were they accompanied by 
			qualifications. Moreover, the explanation the FDA offers to 
			demonstrate that plaintiffs' claims are misleading – that the claims 
			leave out pertinent information – is not support for banning the 
			claims entirely..." 
			Attorney Jonathan Emord from Emord & Associates is widely regarded 
			as one of the most successful and influential attorneys battling the 
			FDA over free speech and health freedoms.
 View video-interview with Jonathan Emord below:
 
			  
			 
 
			
 Emord is also the author of a hugely important book that I strongly 
			recommend. It's called 
			
			Global Censorship of Health Information.
 
 
			  
			  
			
			What it means for health freedom
 
			The upshot of this decision is that the FDA has just been handed a 
			significant defeat that will set a precedent for other dietary 
			supplement companies to make their own truthful, 
			scientifically-supported health claims.
 
 The FDA, of course, recognizes no law other than its own, so it will 
			likely continue to try to terrorize nutritional supplement companies 
			with its usual threats of imprisonment of company founders and 
			seizure of products unless companies voluntarily agree to comply 
			with the FDA's censorship schemes.
 
			  
			However, this court decision may 
			finally turn the tide against the FDA's campaign of ignorance that 
			has, for decades, sought to keep the American people nutritionally 
			illiterate while suppressing the dietary supplements industry.
 Btu achieving a lasting victory over the FDA will require 
			nutritional supplement companies to stop being intimidated by the 
			FDA and start making truthful, scientifically-supported claims - 
			and then stand behind those claims with a commitment to sue the FDA 
			if they are threatened with censorship. Until now, most nutritional 
			supplement and vitamin companies have been so intimidated by the FDA 
			that they dared not challenge the FDA's authority - even when they 
			knew the FDA was flat-out wrong!
 
 The FDA, you see, can always threaten a company using 
			"terrorism-style" tactics such as sending threatening letters that 
			promise to arrest the owners, imprison them, destroy their business, 
			seize their customer records, confiscate their inventory, etc.
 
			  
			These tactics have all been used by the 
			FDA to threaten health product companies operating in the United 
			States. See how
			
			the FDA runs its own criminal extortion racket.
 Read about 
			
			how the FDA kidnaps people from other countries in order 
			to incarcerate them for their non-crimes in the USA.
 
			
			These Gestapo-style FDA tactics have been frighteningly effective, 
			given that most U.S. companies don't have the financial resources to 
			engage in a lengthy legal battle with the FDA in order to stand up 
			for their First Amendment rights.
 
			  
			That's why this victory by the 
			Alliance for Natural Health is so important: It provides a legal 
			wedge by which other companies can now begin to stand up for their 
			own First Amendment rights, too.
 This could be the beginning of the end of FDA censorship of 
			truthful, scientifically-supported health claims.
 
 
			  
			  
			
			What we want - Free Speech, not fraudulent speech
 
			As the editor of NaturalNews, I want to be perfectly clear what we 
			stand for here.
 
			  
			I do not support a Wild West approach to free speech 
			about supplements where any company can claim anything they want 
			whether it's true or not. That can get entirely out of hand, and it 
			would only encourage the kind of marketing fraud we now see rampant 
			in the pharmaceutical industry.
 What I support is truthful health claims that can be backed by a 
			minimum of three articles published in peer-reviewed science 
			journals. This threshold of scientifically credibility is high 
			enough to avoid outright fraudulent quack claims while still 
			allowing truthful claims to be reasonably met through scientific 
			inquiry. If such a rule were adopted, it would open the industry to 
			making a wealth of truthful claims about the beneficial effects of 
			foods, herbs and supplements.
 
 The FDA's current oppression of health claims about cherries and 
			walnuts, for example, would cease.
 
			  
			Both the FDA
			and
			
			FTC have been
			
			attempting to suppress the truth about 
			cherries for many years, intimidating cherry product 
			companies with all sorts of threats to try to force them to remove 
			any links to scientific information about the health benefits of 
			cherries.  
 The federal government has also
			
			declared war on truthful speech 
			about the health benefits of walnuts.
 
 
			  
			  
			
			Why Free Speech can save America from sick-care bankruptcy
 
			Most U.S. consumers have no idea that the FDA is operating as a 
			rogue agency, attempting to destroy nutritional knowledge and 
			intentionally keep consumers in the dark about the health benefits 
			of natural products.
 
 Given that our nation's sick-care system is driving us all into 
			bankruptcy, it would seem more important than ever to allow 
			consumers to learn how to prevent disease and improve their own 
			health through safe, natural and low-cost therapies involving 
			healing foods and nutritional supplements.
 
 In fact, I would argue that any nation that expects to have a viable 
			economic future MUST protect free speech for its health products 
			companies.
 
			  
			If Big Pharma and the disease industry 
			is allowed to monopolize all health knowledge while oppressing 
			truthful health claims on competing products, it will only drive 
			that nation into medical bankruptcy. Coincidentally, that is exactly 
			where America is today: Living under an oppressive, monopolized 
			sick-care system that attempts to criminalize truthful speech about 
			the health benefits of natural products. 
 And yet natural products are the solution to America's health care 
			problems! Read my special report: Nutrition Can Save America! right 
			here (it's free):
 http://www.naturalnews.com/028879_censorship_healing_foods.html
 
 There's no question about it: America will be happier, healthier, 
			stronger and more financially solvent if we end FDA censorship and 
			take steps to protect the First Amendment rights of nutritional 
			supplement companies.
 
 NaturalNews will continue to work alongside the 
			
			Alliance for Natural 
			Health to help make this dream a reality.
			The European branch of this organization is found at 
			
			http://www.anh-europe.org.
 
 Please consider supporting the ANH. It is, in my opinion, one of the 
			most important and effective health freedom organizations on the 
			planet.
 
			  
			They are doing fantastic work and they need your financial 
			support to continue fighting (and winning!) these battles against 
			FDA ignorance, tyranny, censorship and oppression. 
			    |