| 
			 
			  
			
			 
			 
			
			  
			by Ethan A. Huff 
			
			staff writer 
			December 17, 2013  
			
			from
			
			NaturalNews Website 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			A prominent Harvard University professor 
			has compiled a new report that slams the U.S. Food and Drug 
			Administration (FDA) 
			for its failure to honestly and ethically approve new drugs.  
			
			  
			
			Set to be published in a special issue 
			of the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, the damning report 
			declares that the FDA "cannot be trusted," noting that virtually all 
			new drugs approved by the agency over the past 30 years are little 
			or no better than existing drugs already on the market. 
			 
			Entitled "Institutional 
			Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective 
			Drugs," the report by Professor Donald W. Light 
			provides solid evidence to show that the FDA is nothing more than a 
			pay-for-play front group that caters strictly to the interests of 
			the pharmaceutical industry.  
			
			  
			
			Since
			
			drug companies are what primarily 
			funds the FDA these days, the agency has lowered the barriers to 
			entry for new drugs, speeding up the approval process while at the 
			same time putting patients at increased risk. 
  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			Prescription 
			drugs used as prescribed kill at least 125,000 people annually, says 
			report 
			
			 
			As the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S., prescription 
			drugs are among the most dangerous substances in the world.
			 
			
			  
			
			According to Prof. Light's research, 
			tens of thousands of patients are hospitalized annually due to 
			adverse effects from prescription drugs, and another several 
			thousand die - and all this from taking prescription drugs as 
			prescribed. 
			
				
				"[O]ver the past 30 years, approved 
				drugs have caused an epidemic of harmful side effects, even when 
				properly prescribed," explains a preface to the Harvard report.
				 
				  
				
				"Every week, about 53,000 excess 
				hospitalizations and about 2,400 excess deaths occur in the 
				United States among people taking properly prescribed drugs to 
				be healthier." 
			 
			
			Much of this is due to the fact that FDA 
			scrutiny of new drugs is on the decline.  
			
			  
			
			Based on the evidence, the FDA spends 
			far more time rushing new drugs to market than it does actually 
			assessing the safety and efficacy of new drugs, many of which are 
			nothing more than old drugs repackaged with minor changes.
			 
			
			  
			
			These changes, of course, allow drug 
			companies to renew their patents and thus earn new record-breaking 
			profits. 
			
				
				"The FDA in effect serves as the 
				re-generator of patent-protected high prices for minor drugs in 
				each disease group, as their therapeutic equivalents lose patent 
				protection," explains the report.  
				  
				
				"The FDA routinely approves scores 
				of new minor variations each year, with minimal evidence about 
				risks of harm... One in every five drugs approved ends up 
				causing serious harm." 
				 
				"This is the opposite of what people want or expect from the 
				FDA." 
			 
			
			  
			
			 
			 
			FDA conspiring 
			with Big Pharma to market 'diseases' that don't even exist 
			
			 
			If this is not bad enough, the FDA is also actively complicit in a
			
			massive Big Pharma scheme that 
			involves inventing new diseases and marketing them to the 
			public in order to sell more drugs.  
			
			  
			
			So-called "preventative" drugs for 
			diseases like Alzheimer's, for instance, are the drug industry's 
			latest form of 'snake oil' that the FDA is welcoming with 
			open arms. 
			
				
				"The New England Journal of Medicine 
				has published, without comment, proposals by two senior figures 
				from the FDA to loosen criteria drugs that allege to prevent 
				Alzheimer's disease by treating it at an early stage," explains 
				Prof. Light.  
				  
				
				"The proposed looser criteria would 
				legitimate drugs as 'safe and effective' that have little or no 
				evidence of being effective and expose millions to risks of 
				harmful side effects." 
			 
			
			 
			 
  
			
			Sources 
			
				
			 
			
  
			
			
			  
			 |