| 
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			
			  
			IANS 
			Apr 28, 2011 
			
			from 
			
			IbnLive Website 
  
			
			You find yourself in the middle of a 
			bunch of streets and buildings in an unfamiliar neighborhood. Giving 
			the environment a quick once-over, you make a snap decision about 
			whether you're safe or not. Chances are, that 'gut' call is the 
			right one. 
			 
			Binghamton University evolutionary biologists Dan O'Brien and
			David Sloan Wilson set out to test whether we do indeed have 
			the capacity to judge urban neighborhood safety just by looking at 
			physical structures, reports the Journal of Personality and Social 
			Psychology. 
			
			 
			They showed participants a selection of photos taken in unfamiliar 
			neighborhoods and then asked them to rate what they thought the 
			social quality in each of these environments might be, according to 
			a Binghamton statement. 
			 
			The responses were then compared to the results of a previous study 
			O'Brien and Wilson had conducted in which participants were asked to 
			rate their own neighborhoods on a similar scale. Interestingly 
			enough, the ratings between the two study groups proved very 
			similar. 
			 
			If an outsider thought a neighborhood looked safe, people actually 
			living were able to verify it.  
			
			  
			
			The question remained, however, what 
			cues in a neighborhood help an individual to come to these 
			conclusions? 
			
				
				"Sociologists have long understood 
				that signs of 'disorder' - loose garbage and broken windows - 
				indicate a weak community that is vulnerable to criminal 
				behavior," said O'Brien. 
				 
				"And further investigation verified that participants were 
				indeed equating unkempt lawns, peeling paint and unchecked 
				litter with a lack of safety. 
				 
				"We already know that most of us use available cues to judge 
				people we've just met. Why not neighborhoods? The information is 
				there, the question was just whether we pay attention to it or 
				not." 
			 
			
			It appears that we do, and O'Brien and 
			Wilson have termed this ability "community perception".  
			 
			 
   
			
			
			 
			 
			 
			 
			 
			 
			
			
			'Gut Feeling' May Be Connected to Past 
			Experience 
			by Alan Mozes 
			
			Psychological Science 
			2001 
			
			from
			
			Robertamittman Website 
			 
			Have a hunch that something’s about to go terribly wrong?  
			
			  
			
			It may just be paranoia. Or, researchers 
			suggest, it may be an entirely accurate “gut feeling” based on 
			subtle, unconscious comparisons with past events. 
			
				
				“The bottom line is that sometimes 
				when people get a hunch, it’s not mysterious,” said study lead 
				author Dr. Edward S. Katkin of the State University of 
				New York at Stony Brook. 
				  
				
				“It’s because people are in a 
				situation that has been associated with some event in the past - 
				they might not consciously remember it but their guts do. And so 
				they get a sense that something is going to happen.” 
			 
			
			In their research, Katkin’s team tested 
			whether or not gut feelings might accurately predict events, and 
			which sensory cues worked to provoke such hunches. 
			 
			Their study included 36 male and female undergraduate students aged 
			18 to 41. The researchers first measured each participant’s general 
			sensitivity to stimuli by assessing their ability to accurately 
			monitor their own heartbeat while simply sitting still. 
			 
			Katkin’s group classified one third of the individuals to be good 
			‘heartbeat detectors,’ while the remaining two-thirds were judged to 
			have poor sensitivity in that respect. 
			 
			They then showed all the students films of spiders and snakes 
			intercut with abstract images - moving too quickly for the students 
			to consciously register what they saw. Upon a first viewing, small 
			shocks were administered randomly following certain images. Upon a 
			second viewing, students were asked to predict when the shocks would 
			occur. 
			 
			Katkin and his team report that those students who had been 
			determined to have high sensitivity to sensory cues - the good 
			heartbeat detectors - predicted the occurrence of shocks better than 
			those who had poor sensitivity. 
			 
			They conclude that even though none of the students could recognize 
			any of the images they had seen, those with high sensitivity had 
			absorbed the images subconsciously and linked them intuitively with 
			their initial shock experience. 
			 
			The study findings will be published in the September issue of 
			Psychological Science. 
			 
			Katkin told Reuters Health that while the association between 
			accurate gut feelings and subconsciously registered stimuli may 
			ultimately involve other additional influences, the connection 
			appeared to be clear and substantial. 
			
				
				“We may consciously forget certain 
				past experiences, but our bodies have a more lasting memory than 
				our consciousness does and we respond to these experiences with 
				these gut feelings,” he said.  
				  
				
				“And there are individual 
				differences in how sensitive people are, so that those who are 
				more in tune with their bodies are more likely to have these gut 
				feelings.” 
			 
			
			However, Katkin cautioned that the 
			findings should not be viewed as proof that all intuitions, feelings 
			or hunches have solid foundations.  
			
				
				“There are lots of people who are 
				having inaccurate hunches all the time, and I can’t address 
				that,” he said. “I don’t know why they do.” 
			 
	
			
			  
			 |