Spanish version

 

 

Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Daniel Chamovitz

November 7, 2013

 

 

Daniel Chamovitz is director of the Manna Center for Plant Biosciences at Tel Aviv University, Israel.

 

 


Have you ever wondered what the grass under your feet feels, what an apple tree smells, or a marigold sees?

 

Plants stimulate our senses constantly, but most of us never consider them as sensory beings too. In fact senses are extremely important to plants. Whatever life throws at them, they remain rooted to the spot - they cannot migrate in search of food, escape a swarm of locusts or find shelter from a storm.

 

To grow and survive in unpredictable conditions, plants need to sense their environment and react accordingly. Some people may not be comfortable describing what plants do as seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting and touching.

 

They certainly lack noses, eyes, ears, mouths and skin, but in what follows, I hope to convince you that the sensory world of plants is not so very different from our own.

 

 

 

 

Plants have scientifically been show to draw alternative sources of energy from other plants.

 

Plants influence each other in many ways and they communicate through "nanomechanical oscillations" vibrations on the tiniest atomic or molecular scale or as close as you can get to telepathic communication.

 

However, their sense and communication are measureable in very much the ways as are humans.
 

 


SIGHT


What do plants see?

 

The obvious answer is that, like us, they see light. Just as we have photoreceptors in our eyes, they have their own throughout their stems and leaves. These allow them to differentiate between red and blue, and even see wavelengths that we cannot, in the far red and ultraviolet parts of the spectrum.

 

Plants also see the direction light is coming from, can tell whether it is intense or dim and can judge how long ago the lights were turned off.

 

Studies have shown that plants bend to the light as if hungry for the sun's rays, which is exactly what they are. Photosynthesis uses light energy to turn carbon dioxide and water into sugar, so plants need to detect light sources to get food.

 

We now know they do this using phototropins - light receptors in the membranes of cells in the plant's tip. Phototropins are sensitive to blue light. When they sense it, they initiate a cascade of signals that ends up modulating the activity of the hormone auxin. This causes cells on the shaded side of the stem to elongate, bending the plant towards the light.

 

Plants see red light using receptors in their leaves called phytochromes.

 

A phytochrome is a sort of light-activated switch: when irradiated with red light, it changes its conformation so that it is primed to detect far-red light, and when irradiated by far red it changes back to the form that is sensitive to red light.

 

This has two key functions.

It allows plants to "turn off" at the end of the day - because far-red light predominates at sunset - and wake up again next day when the sun is high enough in the sky for red light to switch their phytochromes back on. It also allows them to sense when they are in the shade.

Chlorophyll, the main pigment for photosynthesis, absorbs red but not far-red light, so when a plant is being crowded out by other plants it will see more far-red light than when it is growing in full sunshine.

 

This directly influences the level of activated phytochromes, causing the plant to grow rapidly to get better exposure to the sun.

 

Phototropins and phytochromes are completely different from the photoreceptors found in animals' eyes, although all consist of a protein connected to a chemical dye that absorbs the light.

 

There is one type of photoreceptor, however, that we share.

 

During daylight hours, cryptochromes within cells detect blue and UV light, using this signal to set an organism's internal clock or circadian rhythms. In plants, this clock regulates many processes, including leaf movements and photosynthesis.

 

So sight even helps plants tell the time.

 

 

 

TOUCH

Plants live in a very tactile world.

 

Branches sway in the wind, insects crawl across leaves, and vines search out supports to hang on to. Plants are even sensitive to hot and cold, allowing them to respond to the weather by doing things like changing their growth rates and modulating their use of water. Simply touching or shaking a plant is often enough to reduce its growth, which is why vegetation in windswept locations tends to be stunted.

 

All plants can sense mechanical forces to some degree, but tactile sensitivity is most obvious in the carnivorous Venus flytrap. When a fly, beetle or even a small frog crawls across its specially adapted leaves, these spring together with surprising force, sandwiching the unsuspecting prey and blocking its escape.

 

The Venus flytrap (pictured below) knows when to shut because it feels its prey touching large hairs on the two lobes of the trap.

 

 

 

 

But it won't just snap shut with any stimulation - at least two hair touches must occur within about 20 seconds of each other.

 

This helps to ensure that the prey is the ideal size and will not be able to wiggle out of the trap once it closes.

 

The mechanism by which the Venus flytrap feels its prey is uncannily similar to the way you feel a fly crawling on your arm. Touch receptors in your skin sense the insect and activate an electrical current that passes along nerves until it reaches your brain, which registers the fly's presence and instigates a response.

 

Likewise, when a fly rubs up against the Venus flytrap's hairs, it induces a current that radiates throughout the leaves. This activates ion channels in the cell membrane and the trap springs shut, all in less than one-tenth of a second.

 

Although most plants do not react this fast, they feel a mechanical stimulus in the same way.

 

What's really fascinating is that even at the level of individual cells, plants and animals use similar proteins to feel things. These mechanoreceptors are embedded in the cell membranes and, when stimulated by mechanical pressure or distortion, they allow charged ions to cross the membrane.

 

This creates a difference in electrical charge between the inside and the outside of the cell, which generates a current. Unlike us, plants lack a brain to translate these signals into sensations with emotional connotations.

 

Nevertheless, their sensitivity to touch allows them to respond to their changing environments in specific and appropriate ways.

 

 

 

SMELL

 

The parasitic vine called dodder is the sniffer dog of the vegetable world. It contains almost no chlorophyll - the pigment that most plants use to make food - so to eat it must suck the sugary sap from other plants.

 

Dodder uses olfaction to hunt down its quarry. It can distinguish potential victims from their smell, homing in on its favorites and also using scents emitted by unhealthy specimens to avoid them (Science, vol 313, p 1964).

 

Dodder is exceptionally sensitive to odors, but all plants have a sense of smell. In animals, sensors in the nose recognize and bind with molecules in the air. Plants also have receptors that respond to volatile chemicals.

 

What do they smell?

 

Back in the 1920s, researchers with the US Department of Agriculture demonstrated that treating unripe fruit with ethylene gas would induce it to ripen.

 

Since then, it has become apparent that all ripening fruits emit ethylene in copious amounts, can smell it, and respond by ripening. This ensures not only that a fruit ripens uniformly but also that neighboring ones ripen together, producing more ethylene and leading to a ripening cascade. Coordinated ripening is important because it attracts animals to eat the fruit and disperse the seeds.

 

Ethylene is a plant hormone that regulates many processes, so being able to smell it has other advantages too, such as in the coordination of leaf-colour changes in the autumn.

 

Above all, however, smell allows plants to communicate. Research in the 1980s showed that healthy trees in the vicinity of caterpillar-infested ones were resistant to the pests because their leaves contained chemicals that made them unpalatable.

 

Other trees isolated from the infestation did not produce these chemicals, so it seemed that the attacked trees had sent an airborne pheromonal message that primed healthy trees to prepare for imminent attack.

 

We now know that many volatile chemicals are involved.

 

 

 

TASTE

 

Our senses of smell and taste are intimately entwined. Conceptually, smells enhance or dampen tastes sensed by our tongues.

 

Physically, our mouths and nasal cavities are connected so that our noses can pick up smells released as food is chewed. The major difference is that smell deals with volatile chemicals and taste senses soluble chemicals.

 

The two senses are also connected in plants.

 

This is best seen in their responses to attacks by insects or pathogenic bacteria. As we have already seen, plants under attack emit a variety of volatile chemicals to warn their neighbors, but one called methyl jasmonate is particularly important. This is where taste comes in.

 

Although methyl jasmonate is a gas and so an effective airborne messenger molecule, it is not very active in plants. Instead, when it diffuses in through the stomata - the pores in the surface of the leaf - it gets converted into the water-soluble jasmonic acid.

 

This attaches to a specific receptor in the cells and triggers the leaf's defense responses. Just as our tongues contain receptors for different taste molecules in food, plants contain receptors for different soluble molecules, including jasmonic acid.

 

As taste involves soluble chemicals, it is perhaps not surprising that much of a plant's sense of taste is in its roots, surrounded as they are by soil and water.

 

A classic experiment reveals that plants can use underground chemical messages to recognize their relatives nearby (New Scientist, 26 March 2011, p46). There is also root-to-root communication between unrelated neighbors.

 

When a row of plants was subjected to drought conditions, it took just one hour for the message to travel to plants that were five rows away, causing them to close their stomata in preparation for a lack of water (PLoS One, vol6, pe23625). Other plants that were just as close but not connected by their roots failed to react.

 

So the signal must have been passed from root to root, probably taking the form of a soluble molecule.

 



HEARING

You have probably heard conflicting stories about the musical preferences of plants.

 

Some people are convinced they flourish when exposed to classical compositions, others believe that heavy metal or bebop does the trick. Strangely, plants' musical tastes show a remarkable congruence with those of the humans reporting them.

 

Although research in this area has a long history, most of it is not very scientific and, if you think about it, experiments studying music and plants were doomed from the start.

 

We don't judge a plant's vision by showing it an eye chart and asking it to read the bottom line. Olfaction is not measured by its ability to differentiate between Chanel No.5 and Old Spice.

 

Music is not ecologically relevant for plants, so we shouldn't expect them to be tuned in to it. But there are sounds that, at least theoretically, it could be advantageous for them to hear. These include the vibrations produced by insects, such as a bee's buzz or an aphid's wing beat, and minuscule sounds that might be created by even smaller organisms.

 

Plants might even benefit from the ability to detect certain sounds produced by other plants.

 

For example, researchers at the Institute of Plant Sciences in Bern, Switzerland, recently recorded ultrasonic vibrations emanating from pine and oak trees during a drought (New Phytologist, vol179, p1070), perhaps signaling to other trees to prepare for dry conditions.

 

Stefano Mancuso from the International Laboratory of Plant Neurobiology at the University of Florence, Italy, and his colleagues are starting to apply rigorous standards to study plant hearing (Trends in Plant Sciences, vol17, p323). Their preliminary results indicate that corn roots grow towards specific frequencies of vibrations.

 

What is even more surprising is their finding that roots themselves may also be emitting sound waves. For now, though, we have no idea how a plant might produce sound signals let alone how they might detect them.

 

If this research pans out, then we will know that plants have the same five senses as animals.

 

Either way, there can be no doubt that plants are sensually aware organisms in their own right.

 

Back to Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

How Plants Help Each Other Grow by Near-Telepathic Communication

by Michael Forrester

May 10, 2013

 

 

Michael Forrester is a spiritual counselor and is a practicing motivational speaker for corporations in Japan, Canada and the United States.

 

 


Plants have scientifically been show to draw alternative sources of energy from other plants.

 

Plants influence each other in many ways and they communicate through "nanomechanical oscillations" vibrations on the tiniest atomic or molecular scale or as close as you can get to telepathic communication.

 

 


 


Members of Professor Dr. Olaf Kruse’s biological research team have previously shown that green algae not only engages in photosynthesis, but also has an alternative source of energy: it can draw it from other plants. His research findings were released in the online journal Nature Communications.

 

Other research published last year, showed that young corn roots made clicking sounds, and that when suspended in water they would lean towards sounds made in the same frequency range (about 220 Hz).

 

So it seemed that plants do emit and react to sound, and the researchers wanted to delve into this idea further.

Working with chili plants in their most recent study, specifically Capsicum annuum, they first grew chili seeds on their own and then in the presence of other chili plants, basil and fennel, and recorded their rates of germination and growth.

 

Fennel is considered an aggressive plant that hinders the germination of other plants around it, while basil is generally considered to be a beneficial plant for gardening and an ideal companion for chili plants.

Germination rates were fairly low when the seeds were grown on their own, lower when grown in the presence of fennel (as expected). Germination rates were better with other chili plants around, and even better with basil.

Since plants are already known to 'talk' through chemical signals and to react to light, the researchers separated newly planted seeds from the other plants using black plastic, to block any other kind of 'signaling' other than through sound.

 

When fennel was on the other side of the plastic, the chemical effects of its presence, which would have inhibited germination of the chili seeds, were blocked. The chili seeds grew much quicker than normal though, possibly because they still 'knew' the fennel was there, 'knew' it had the potential to have a negative effect on their germination, and so they quickly got past the stage where they were vulnerable.

If even bacteria can signal one another with vibrations, why not plants, said Monica Gagliano, a plant physiologist at the University of Western Australia in Crawley.

Gagliano imagines that root-to-root alerts could transform a forest into an organic switchboard.

"Considering that entire forests are all interconnected by networks of fungi, maybe plants are using fungi the way we use the Internet and sending acoustic signals through this Web. From here, who knows," she said.

As with other life, if plants do send messages with sound, it is one of many communication tools.

 

More work is needed to bear out Gagliano's claims, but there are many ways that listening to plants already bears fruit.

 

According to the study:

"This demonstrated that plants were able to sense their neighbors even when all known communication channels are blocked (i.e. light, chemicals and touch) and most importantly, recognize the potential for the interfering presence of a 'bad neighbor' and modify their growth accordingly."

Then, to test if they could see similar effects with a 'good neighbor', they tried the same experiment with other chili plants and then with basil. When there were fully-grown chili plants in their presence blocked by the plastic, the seeds showed some improved germination ("partial response").

 

When basil was on the other side of the plastic, they found that the seeds grew just as well as when the plastic wasn't there.

"Our results show that plants are able to positively influence growth of seeds by some as yet unknown mechanism," said Dr. Monica Gagliano, an evolutionary biologist at UWA and co-author of the study, according to BioMed Central.

 

"Bad neighbors, such as fennel, prevent chili seed germination in the same way.

 

We believe that the answer may involve acoustic signals generated using nanomechanical oscillations from inside the cell which allow rapid communication between nearby plants."

 

 

What Can Humans Learn?

Flowers need water and light to grow and people are no different.

 

Our physical bodies are like sponges, soaking up the environment.

"This is exactly why there are certain people who feel uncomfortable in specific group settings where there is a mix of energy and emotions," said psychologist and energy healer Dr. Olivia Bader-Lee.

"When energy studies become more advanced in the coming years, we will eventually see this translated to human beings as well," stated Bader-Lee.

 

"The human organism is very much like a plant, it draws needed energy to feed emotional states and this can essentially energize cells or cause increases in cortisol and catabolize cells depending on the emotional trigger."

Olivia Bader-Lee suggests that the field of bioenergy is now ever evolving and that studies on the plant and animal world will soon translate and demonstrate what energy metaphysicians have known all along - that humans can heal each other simply through energy transfer just as plants do.

"Human can absorb and heal through other humans, animals, and any part of nature. That's why being around nature is often uplifting and energizing for so many people," she concluded.

Back to Contents

 

 

 

 

 

Videos

 

 

 

Mind of Plants

by nature view NL
July 14, 2015

from YouTube Website

 





 

 


What Plants Talk About
by WildLife
October 19, 2015
from YouTube Website

 


When we think about plants,

we don't often associate a term like "behavior" with them,

but experimental plant ecologist JC Cahill wants to change that.

The University of Alberta professor maintains that plants

do behave and lead anything but solitary and sedentary lives.

What Plants Talk About teaches us all

that plants are smarter and much more interactive

than we thought!

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Contents