|

by Marco Torres
January 3, 2013
from
WakingTimes Website
Spanish version
Italian version

There are more health myths
propagated by the media and
conventional medicine today than
there ever have been throughout history.
In large part, this is due to a lack of
public education and a broadening of the corporate powers who
promote myths to achieve very specific and malicious goals all in
the name of profit.
Myth #1
Conventional medicine and the
healthcare system helps sick people
Perhaps the biggest health myth today is the public’s misconception
that mainstream medicine and the healthcare system 'helps sick
people.' Nothing could be further from the truth.
The freedom of people to choose,
...could soon be threatened by corporate
lobbyists who will do anything to protect their wealth at the
expense of your health.
Promoters of conventional medicine claim that all the drug studies,
approvals, surgical procedures, all other treatments are based on
scientific evidence.
But is it really science? What passes
for “science” today is a collection of health myths, half-truths,
intellectual dishonesty and fraudulent reporting to help serve
higher interests. Science is not really science anymore.
90 percent of all diseases (cancer, diabetes, depression, heart
disease, etc.) are easily preventable through,
-
diet
-
nutrition
-
sunlight
-
exercise
None of these solutions are ever
promoted by conventional medicine because they make no money.
No pharmaceuticals actually cure or resolve the underlying
causes of disease. Even “successful” drugs only manage symptoms,
usually at the cost of interfering with other physiological
functions that will cause side effects down the road.
There is no such thing as a drug without
a side effect. There is no financial incentive for anyone in today’s
system of medicine (drug companies, hospitals, doctors, etc.) to
actually make patients well.
Profits are found in continued sickness,
not wellness or prevention.
Almost all the “prevention” programs you see today (such as free
mammograms or other screening programs) are nothing more than
patient recruitment schemes designed to increase revenue and
sickness. They use free screenings to scare people into agreeing
to unnecessary treatments that only lead to further disease.
Mammography is a very good example.
Chemotherapy is another.
Nobody has any interest in your health except you. No corporation,
no doctor, and no government has any desire to actually make you
well. This has served the short-term financial interests of higher
powers in the west very well.
The only healthy, aware, critically
thinking individuals are all 100% free of pharmaceuticals and
processed foods.
MYTH #2
Vaccines prevent diseases and increase
immunity
The term “immunization”, often substituted
for vaccination, is false and
should be legally challenged.
Medical research has well established
that the direct injection of foreign proteins and other toxic
material (particularly known immune-sensitizing poisons such as
mercury) makes the recipient more, not less, easily affected by what
he/she encounters in the future.
This means they do the opposite of
immunize, commonly even preventing immunity from developing after
natural exposure.
The actual frequency of health problems has been estimated by
authorities to be possibly up to 100 times, or more, greater than
that reported by government agencies. That difference is due to the
lack of enforcement or incentive for doctors to report adverse
effects.
With the anti-vaccination movements now
exposing the truth on the internet,
the medical community is now on high alert, defending their claims
and being told by vaccine manufacturers that they must never let
their patients (or parents) think that the risks could outweigh the
benefits, when in reality, it is precisely the opposite that is
true.
The benefit risk ratio is an important decision in anyone deciding
whether to vaccinate or not.
Contrary to popular belief and
marketing, childhood diseases in a developed country are not as
dangerous as we are led to believe. Catching a particular disease
does not mean you will die from it. Vaccines were actually
introduced at a time when diseases had already declined to a low
risk level.
This fact is proven, scientifically.
The main advances in combating disease over the last 200 years have
been better food and clean drinking water… not vaccines.
Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living conditions
also contribute. This is also borne out in published peer reviewed
research which prove that vaccine did not save us.
All vaccines contain sterility agents, neurotoxins, immunotoxins,
and carcinogenic compounds.
Some examples include,
-
formaldehyde, a carcinogen
found in almost every vaccine
-
neurotoxins such as,
-
monosodium glutamate
-
potassium chloride
-
thimerosal
-
sterility agents such as,
-
Triton X-100
-
octoxynol-10
-
polysorbate 80
-
immuntoxins such as,
...to name a few of many.
It is no coincidence that
the more educated you are, the less chance you
will vaccinate which contradicts the misconceptions of
many health professionals who profess that parents don’t vaccinate
because they are under-educated, poor or misinformed.
Those who become fully informed of the
dangers of vaccines never see them in the same light again, as their
motives then become clear.
MYTH #3
We must all focus on lowering bad
cholesterol
Perhaps one of the biggest health myths propagated in western
culture and certainly in the United States, is the misuse of an
invented term “bad cholesterol” by the media
and medical community.
Moreover, a scientifically-naive
public has been conned into a fraudulent correlation between
elevated cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Cholesterol has not been shown to actually cause CVD.
To the contrary, cholesterol is vital
to our survival, and trying to artificially lower it can have
detrimental effects, particularly as we age.
We have become a culture so obsessed with eating foods low in
cholesterol and fat that many health experts are now questioning
the consequences.
Could we really maintain a dietary
lifestyle that was so foreign to many of our ancestral populations
without any ill effects on our health? Many researchers are now
concluding that the answer to that question is “NO.”
Current data is now suggesting that
lower cholesterol levels predate the development of cancer.
The ‘noddy-science’ offered by marketing men to a generally
scientifically-naive public has led many people to believe that we
should replace certain food choices with specially developed
products that can help ‘reduce cholesterol’. Naturally this comes at
a price and requires those who can afford it to pay maybe four or
five times what a ‘typical ordinary’ product might cost.
But is this apparent ‘blanket need’ to
strive towards lowering our cholesterol justified? And, indeed, is
it healthy?
The cholesterol itself, whether being transported by LDL or HDL, is
exactly the same. Cholesterol is simply a necessary ingredient that
is required to be regularly delivered around the body for the
efficient healthy development, maintenance and functioning of our
cells.
The difference is in the ‘transporters’
(the lipoproteins HDL and LDL) and both types are essential for the
human body’s delivery logistics to work effectively. Problems can
occur, however, when the LDL particles are both small and their
carrying capacity outweighs the transportation potential of
available HDL.
This can lead to more cholesterol being
‘delivered’ around the body with lower resources for returning
excess capacity to the liver.
MYTH #4
Medical screening and treatments
prevent death
Even though the medical community advocates for regular screenings
for those with illnesses, they may bring little benefit and may
actually pose harm to your health.
This applies to almost every type of
medical screening for cancer and several other diseases. Medical
screening carries an immense risk in itself, not only due to the
damage inflicted by screening techniques on the human body, but by
the very nature of medical follow-up protocols.
These protocols usually encourage
patients to enter deeper into more invasive techniques, which
further cripple health and lead to a very high percentage of
fatalities.
In a Swedish study of 60,000 women, 70 percent of the
mammographically detected tumors weren’t tumors at all.
These “false positives” aren’t just
financial and emotional strains, they may also lead to many
unnecessary and invasive biopsies. In fact, 70 to 80 percent of all
positive mammograms do not, upon biopsy, show any presence of
cancer.
A prostate (PSA) blood test looks for prostate-specific antigen, a
protein produced by the prostate gland. High levels are supposedly
associated with prostate cancer. The problem is that the
association isn’t always correct, and when it is, the prostate
cancer isn’t necessarily deadly.
Only about 3 percent of all men die
from prostate cancer.
The PSA test usually leads to
overdiagnosis - biopsies and treatment in which the side effects are
impotence and incontinence. Repeated biopsies may spread cancer
cells into the track formed by the needle, or by spilling cancerous
cells directly into the bloodstream or lympathic system.
News coverage of many diseases focus too much on treatments and not
enough on prevention, a trend that could prove risky in the long run
for most people who don’t understand how to take care of their
health.
The biggest single type of story we usually hear about on the news
involves treatment, and narratives lend themselves much better to
that kind of story. Stories about prevention, about people
exercising and eating right, just don’t make great copy.
If our current treatment approach to health continues, hundreds of
years from now, mankind may look back at today’s “modern medicine”
and think:
-
How could they have been so
primitive in ideology and so wrong?
-
What lack of humanitarianism in
government allowed the medical industries to kill people
with economically driven false beliefs and ideas?
-
Why didn’t government stop them?
-
Who were the people in charge of
protecting those citizens?
Preventive education demands increased
funding for research into new dietary, physical activity,
behavioral, socioeconomic, environmental and medical approaches for
the prevention of chronic disease.
Children who grow into teenagers and
then adults require more accountability for their own well-being
through health conscious decisions which are motivated by proper
practical and theoretical applications.
They need to know that treatment
modalities and pharmaceutical applications may not save their health
in the future.
Substantial political and financial
contributions are also imperative to invest in prevention more
effectively to regulate revisions and mandate policies which affect
the governing bodies of health and education.
Any procrastination or failure to
resolve these matters in the next decade will only lead to the
further deterioration of human health and healthcare systems.
Proper leadership and effective
communication regarding these preventive measures may still reverse
screening/treatment trends and consequently reverse this thinking to
ultimately promote a healthier aging population.
MYTH #5
Fluoride prevents tooth decay
Water fluoridation is a hoax.
Drinking any amount of
fluoride is dangerous to your health
and has NEVER been proven to prevent tooth decay. It’s actually the
biggest scientific fraud ever to be promoted by national and
international Governments.
Fluoride has been linked to,
-
osteoporosis
-
cancer
-
auto-immune diseases,
...and even very small concentrations
can disrupt DNA repair enzymes by 50%.
The fluoride added to our water is a waste product of aluminum and
phosphate fertilizer processing. And it’s not even calcium fluoride
that appears naturally in water, but sodium fluoride, which is a
whole different thing - and loaded with bad news.
In fact, sodium fluoride has no good news. Except for a few suspect
reports by the people selling the stuff, study after research study
proves that sodium fluoride does not protect our teeth, and it does
a number on our bones.
And on other body parts, too, including
our thyroid gland.
-
Fluoride was found to be an
equivocal carcinogen by the National Cancer Institute
Toxicological Program.
-
Drinking fluoridated water will
double the number of hip fractures for both older men and
women.
-
Infertility in women was found
to increase with water fluoridation. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) scientists reported a close correlation
between decreasing total fertility rates in women between
ages of 10 and 49, and increasing fluoride levels.
-
Fluoride has never been found to
effectively reducing tooth decay by any notable margin. No
causation or even correlation was found between the level of
fluoride in water and dental caries in any study.
-
Fluoride also attacks the pineal
gland. The pineal controls our inner clock, provides good
sleep, works with our adrenal glands to handle stress, keeps
the thymus gland fed and cared for, and communicates 24/7
with the rest of the endocrine system about how things are
going. Fluoride calcifies
our pineal gland into a
non-functioning rock.
-
The government classifies sodium
fluoride as environmentally hazardous waste. Anybody
handling it must wear HazMat protective gear. Dumping it
into rivers is a crime.
Much of the original proof that fluoride
is safe for humans in low doses was
generated by A-bomb program scientists,
who had been secretly ordered to provide “evidence useful in
litigation” against defense contractors for fluoride injury to
citizens.
The first lawsuits against the U.S.
A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage,
the documents show.
It seems that the healthiest people on the planet right now are
those that have deviated from the norms of conventional
medical quackery, and have migrated towards natural
health. The proof is in the pudding.
Find the healthiest 5 people you know
and you’ll find they typically don’t subscribe to the health myths
promoted by mainstream medicine.
Your longevity and aging gracefully
depends on it.
|