by Buck Rogers
September 24, 2015
Have you ever wondered what the world
would be like if better and cleaner energy sources were widely
available and affordable to all of earth’s people?
If so, you’re not alone, as the quest
for a better energy existence has been the focus of many ingenious
inventors, scientists, experimenters and even corporate and
government scientists for generations.
We know it’s possible, but for some
reason, though, society just can’t seem to get beyond
23.6 or so miles per gallon on average,
between what science is clearly capable of and what is available to
the consumer mass market is extraordinary, and here really
is no need to be using up the world’s fossil fuels at building
nuclear plants as if there were no tomorrow, but we do.
The truth is there for those whom have
eyes to see.
Tremendous market forces and capital
involved in government and in the energy and automobile industries
make it practically impossible for any promising energy device or
technology patent to emerge as a viable and accessible alternative
in the real marketplace, and not just appearing on YouTube or at
trade shows as prototypes.
Alternatives do exist, but why are they
not more broadly available?
In addition to the more famous cases
such as Wilhelm
Reich, and other scientific geniuses like
or Linus Pauling,
many lesser known inventors have patented or attempted to patent
functional energy devices that just never seem to make it to the
How exactly are advanced energy
technologies and energy devices actually suppressed?
One could argue that the suppression of
energy technologies is a necessary evil by government, as Gary
Vesperson has here:
“An understandable reason for
suppressing certain types of energy inventions is that the
knowledge behind them is also capable of producing tremendously
destructive advanced electromagnetic weapons such as the “death
ray” apparently invented by Nikola Tesla.
Hence many such new energy
technologies, particularly those using this kind of knowledge of
advanced electromagnetic principles, are considered “dual use”
technologies that are among the 4,000 un-numbered patent
applications confiscated in a vault at the US Patent and
Trademark Office because of their military potential and the
need to keep that knowledge from America’s enemies.”
Some cases, perhaps, may surely be
considered national security, but in today’s age, the public is
discouraged from even looking into simple alternatives, and even the
electric car was originally killed.
The works of Nikola Tesla were suppressed by the government and
Who knows precisely how many opportunities the human race has lost
to see free energy?
The Orion Project, an organization
dedicated to the transformation of our energy usage took a close
look at why this is the case, and exactly how the government
suppresses free energy devices. In their review of past and now
obscure technologies, they’ve noted the key ways in which
alternative energy technologies are suppressed.
Take a look:
Our review of past and now-obscure
technological breakthroughs shows that these inventions have
been suppressed or seized by the following broad categories of
1.5.1 Acquisition of the
technology by ‘front’ companies whose intent has been to
‘shelve’ the invention and prevent the device from coming to
1.5.2 Denial of patents and intellectual property protection
by systematic action by the US and other patent offices.
1.5.3 Seizure or suppression of the technology by the
illegal application of section 181 of the US Patent law or
other illegal applications of national security provisions
that result in the technology being classified or deemed “of
significance to the national security”. Note that these
applications are illegal actions taken by rogue,
unsupervised individuals and entities who are working in
collusion with interests to suppress these technologies.
1.5.4 Abuses by other regulatory or licensing entities,
including but not limited to rogue elements within the
Department of Defense, CIA, NSA, Federal Trade Commission,
Department of Energy and others.
1.5.5 Targeting the inventor or company with financial
scams, illegal financial arrangements that lead to the
demise of the company, and similar traps.
1.5.6 Systematic interception of funds and essential
financial support needed to develop and commercialize such
fundamental new energy sources. Summary of Breakthrough
Energy Technologies, 10/19/09 p. 6
1.5.7 A pattern of harassment, bomb threats, theft and other
shadowy actions that frighten, intimidate and demoralize
those inventing, holding or developing such technologies;
significant bodily harm and murder have also apparently
1.5.8 Inducements through significant financial buyouts,
offers of positions of power and prestige and other benefits
to the owner of such technologies to secure their
cooperation in suppressing such technologies.
1.5.9 Scientific establishment prejudice and rejection of
the technology in light of unconventional electromagnetic
effects thought to be not possible by current scientific
1.5.10 Corruption of scientific entities and leaders through
clandestine liaisons with rogue classified or shadowy
private projects that intend to suppress such devices.
1.5.11 Corruption of major media entities and key figures
through clandestine liaisons with rogue classified or
private shadowy projects that intend to suppress such
As you can see, its full spectrum
dominance when it comes to the suppression of energy technologies.
What will it take to see a significant cultural shift toward
sustainable energy technologies?
One has to wonder if the suppression of
such important things as free and
overunity energy is even possible