An Advanced Alien Case
The Mind of a Repeat-Offender
He’s an old alien who oversees IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets) aliens and often comments on their
intervention here. Like the rest of his crew, he’s cautious about
giving out his name. His comments, although usually framed
obliquely, always support the intervention, and he tends to coldly
rationalize its worst abuses. It’s a coldness based upon a larger
map of history and daily reports about alien affairs, a coldness
also fixed by distance, given the millions of light years to his
He isn’t a so-called “Verdant,” the
aliens described by
Phillip Krapf in books about an
alien alignment visiting here. Instead, he’s from a group of aliens
that both he and other aliens say long pre-dates the Verdants.
He acknowledges advances in human consciousness due to interaction
with extraterrestrials, but he’s quick to try to credit that to
the IFSP (and more advanced)
intervention. Such subjects come up in conversations that can
include dozens of different aliens, myself, and a variety of humans.
The other humans in this tend to be cautious and subdued, albeit
with an awareness that’s broadly expanded due to our quickly
The human model for interaction now (in
2007) includes regular hints about community consciousness
and hyper-spatial subtleties (scaling your energy levels way down at
least five orders of finer depth/dimension to allow for quiet,
studious remove from alien attempts at manipulation and to allow for
comparative and phenomenal perspective during interactions). Other
humans in the interaction tend to be cautious due to the
controversies that our discourse touches upon.
The old alien’s tone of address is usually stiff but conversational.
Part of this is due to a multiplicity of distinctions between his
population and the various populations of the IFSP that he works
with. Advanced science frames his thinking, along with
administrative duties of his group’s agenda. So, he’s slightly more
reserved than other aliens—this is necessary to accommodate the
interactions of a variety of mostly younger aliens, but he’s quick
to insert his comments and perspectives when he feels a need to.
Like other aliens, he knows when larger perspective or the greater,
collective wisdom of open-ended consciousness exceeds his
intellectual faculties, but he sometimes tries to reduce even those
divergent perspectives to the terms of the IFSP agenda, here.
And like other aliens, he defers to larger considerations, at least
in form, as a matter of course, even if he disagrees. When he
disagrees, he waits until the subject of discussion has changed to
another topic. He often tries to tangentially manipulate a context
to change topic. In that respect, he isn’t nearly as subtle as other
He tends to hold his head as would an older person, cocked slightly
back as though weighing the thoughts of younger aliens (and humans),
but he seems to fix the direction in which he faces in order to
listen for salient details. He’s quick to seize upon thought
thresholds that provide opportunity for him to reinforce the ideas
and assumptions behind the intervention project here, a kind of
managerial identity salience that he’s quick to jump into.
When remotely interacting with humans,
he doesn’t let his gaze leap around the room to look at every other
alien in his vicinity. Instead, he seems to pride himself on his (psychotronically
assisted) ability to hear their thoughts without having to look
His accent in thought-speech is fairly eclectic, although his
English (to the extent that it can be reduced to the merely verbal)
is closer to an American version, no doubt because of the “joint
interaction,” the way that six or seven supposedly diverse and
contrary alien approaches to
the US black budget regime are
framed to seem as though independent when they actually aren’t
(they’re pre-planned IFSP projects). He appears to minimize his
physical gestures, like Verdants do. Both populations seem to feel
that the appearance of subtlety makes younger IFSP populations feel
acknowledged and included.
However, like Verdants, when he
moves his body he can move very quickly. That same quickness in
aliens tends to surprise humans.
When he appears to be in the company of younger, technologically
less-capable aliens, he seems to position himself in order to denote
the greater extent and longer duration (both as individuals and a
society) of his population. If he senses a need to do so, he can
instantly retreat to a multi-horizoned kind of energies shell, which
is both a warning and a preventative/detecting precaution.
Younger-lived populations evidence both a curiosity and an
admiration for such technology.
The difference between his capabilities
and theirs clearly looms as an advantage, although he’s careful not
to make it seem too deliberate or conspicuous. In other words, his
presence in the room opens a marginally excited curiosity among the
younger aliens, which they try not to be too obvious about. He uses
that distinction to his advantage.
In various aliens’ comments on the subject, the older alien has been
described as part of a project targeting “three elliptical” galaxies
in our larger vicinity. More specifically, he has been said to be
from the large elliptical galaxy Centaurus A (click image
right), which is some 13-14 million light years from the Milky Way.
He verbalizes often yet appears to be trying to pre-empt other
aliens who might remark here.
He and his group clearly want to control
the agenda here, knowing that there are competitors for influence
over humankind. His population has been described as having
pre-dated our own by billions of years, and aliens of his group have
been described as capable of living millions of years, individually.
He’s apparently over 5 feet tall and has a slim but wiry body frame
that’s typical of both the Verdants and some of their affiliated
alien populations. He’s both taller and more sturdy than a gray. He
doesn’t have the gray aliens’ large, wrap-around eyes, judging by a
graphic representation that competing aliens made vivid for us, at
Instead, he has the same kind of eyes
(smaller than grays but slightly almond shaped) and body frame that
Verdants have, reportedly as a result of his population’s
contribution to Verdant development at some point in the past.
Competing aliens informed us of his population’s genetic inputs to
the Verdants and also provided the graphic. In other words, his
population both preceded and may, in part, now control some of the
Verdant and gray agenda.
He routinely gives orders to, and often calls upon, Verdants,
hybrids and other aliens of the so-called IFSP, the abducting
alignment of which the grays are but a small, subordinate part. The
fact that he gives orders so freely is important because it shows
that the IFSP agenda here isn’t a loosely coordinated, unstructured
engagement. Instead, it appears to be a hierarchically structured
project run by a materially motivated group of aliens who have
planted offshoot prototype aliens on planets near our solar system
(without thinking to ask us, in advance, about doing so).
The old alien could be mistaken for a military figure, yet he says
he’s simply part of a “security” structure. He’s coldly distant to
the point of rationalizing the IFSP’s abduction and breeding
program, which involves the kidnapping and forced breeding of
thousands (or more) humans.
When competing aliens point out that the
IFSP’s breeding program “direct operatives” have been inserted into
some ranking positions on this planet and then used to orchestrate
various crimes against humanity (Fritz Thyssen, the prime
early financer of Hitler is but one person cited by competing
aliens as being “direct operative” of the IFSP), the old alien
rationalizes the action as necessary to manipulate humankind toward
his alignment’s desired objective.
What objective? That has been the subject of much discussion.
Thyssen is but one case mentioned. Other
reported direct operatives are noted in previous chapters, and their
crimes cover a broad spectrum of active, ongoing dangers to
humankind. The old alien says that it’s all done to assure that
humankind can be changed to a non-offensive, non-sexual form and to
assure that weapons won’t be carried into space by upstart human
regimes. In other words, the IFSP’s breeding program is
intended to almost entirely replace humankind with an IFSP kind of
What kind of prototype? Recently, the old alien may have let slip
just what his group plans for us.
Over the years of interactions that he has tried to dominate, he has
proven essentially incapable of thinking in ways that are other than
prototypical. He may have shown us a prototype of how (he hopes)
humans will be re-designed, then replaced by the IFSP. The
prototype is a human-hybridized-with-grays version, much
like the reported Roswell prototypes that
Phillip Corso and others
described seeing, first-hand. It may initially (for some thousands
of years) be a hybrid human/alien form that looks much like
Here’s what the old alien showed us:
In October of 2007, while criticizing me for my critiques of
the IFSP, he showed how I would look if I was part of that same
spectrum of hybridized aliens. There it was: a Roswell-like hybrid
with blue human eyes, an angry look on its face (I have red hair and
blue eyes) in order to show me as a troublemaker, or a disagreeable
alien. In other words, emotion was portrayed as vulnerability
(the old alien tries to say only certain kinds of emotion).
It was a strange to see myself as a hybrid prototype, which is
typical of the given alien. He clearly has command over many of the
~prototypical lesser aliens of the IFSP, hence a patronizing gesture
of the sort was but a reflexive remark also intended for the
on-board alien crowd where he was, at the time. Rather than react or
respond with anger, I simply studied the situation. I've found that
if you react with anger, they tend to quickly turn the focus of the
interaction (uninvited in this case) to something humanly dangerous,
i.e. some other crisis or flashpoint on this planet. It’s better to
scale your energy way down (several order of magnitude lower in
energy intensity) and essentially make yourself transparent so that
you can better assess the aliens’ behaviors.
Given the old alien’s military/security inflexibility, he sometimes
lapses into a dogmatic, and cold, sometimes marginally cruel
mindset. He rationalizes it all in terms of the distant Centaurus
A regime, plus a presumption of superiority—a disdain for
younger competitor populations. From the perspective of his
population’s energy and resource objectives, all human concerns are
ancillary, of less importance. His attitude can fluctuate from
disdain, to contempt and (extreme) prejudice, at times. His attitude
is always dry and distant.
He tries to amend the human perception that he’s coldly ineffectual
and prone to rationalize crimes against humanity (if not the
death of the original gray planet) as necessary evils needed to
achieve his group’s agenda. Suffice it to say, it can be distressing
to be subject to interactions with the old alien. To even hear
rationalization for numerous crimes against humanity (some ongoing)
pains me, both because of how the victims (and their families)
suffered and because of the need for other humans to be aware of
* A limited human cohort has witnessed
his communications, at intervals.
He suggests that humans will inevitably be engineered to be
different than we are, hence he says the project can be done
most quickly and efficiently via the IFSP intervention.
The statement is loaded with assumptions on his part. First off, his
group explicitly mentions and rationalizes a bizarrely oversized
Verdant population (reportedly 500 trillion sexuals who’ve taken
246,000 planets for themselves, to date) as part of his group’s
basic strategy. Verdants are reportedly sexual aliens with
physical anatomy (genitalia) and desires not too much different than
those of a human. In other words, the whole intervention—abductions,
forced breeding and planned replacement of humankind, the death of
the grays’ and other planets—is supposedly done to assure the
objective of non-sexual, inoffensive populations where encountered.
Meanwhile, Verdants exist in
drastic disproportion to the manipulated, lesser aliens of their
alignment. Verdants reportedly live a pampered, sexual life,
changing sexual partners every 4-6 decades or so. In short, it may
be safe to say that the IFSP was forcibly compiled in part to serve
the needs of an expanding sexual population (the Verdants), which
would mean that the old alien’s argument is both biased and
Worst of all, competing aliens who have commented on the subject
note that the entire IFSP scheme fits into the older “three
ellipticals” alien’s (group) scheme of gaining direct
control of the energy and resources of all that the IFSP can
dominate. The old alien’s blunt, insensitive outlook may be due to
the fact that his own population, although older than Verdants (who
reportedly reached our technological level 229 million years ago),
was originally like the Verdants - an aggressive,
self-rationalizing population that threw caution aside and
overpopulated in order to gain resources and domain long ago. In
other words, some of the same, primitive impulses that caused the
old alien’s predecessors to exceed ecological proportions still live
on in the old alien and his larger group.
We see evidence for this
in his/their behavior.
In their conversation (sometimes merely broadsides) with humans, the
old alien, and what appear to be IFSP subordinates who defer to his
presence tend to be distant, cautious about how much they say. They
coolly patronize humans. At times, they're quick to make you sense
some feeling either from them, or their technology. They sometimes
do it too deliberately, as though trying to make humans think
they're not so bad because they either have, or are aware of,
feelings of the sort.
Their conversational style is framed in terms of a larger social
identity. In other words, it's not an individual expression of how
"I" feel. It isn't an elaboration about how one is or thinks, versus
the typical person in their pack. Instead, they assume that the
group is either listening in some form, or can monitor the
interaction. Indeed, some of the patronizing, sometimes impolite
tone is due to their assumption that you aren't very evolved if
you're still wrapped up in your individual experience, and not
I've conversed much, too much, with the old alien, who is about two
categories beyond the grays (his population is billions of years
older, as a civilization). It isn’t casual, unstrained communication
but is due to his attempts to intervene, manipulate
and control. I’ve had to probe, test and research his
origins. I’ve had to make space for others to comment on his
behavior and his background.
One problem with the old alien and his
peers (at least their old soldiers, so to speak - security types who
tend to, and apparently even partly designed, the grays who we see
today) is that they’re frustrated because I disagree with their
actions here (manipulation of human conflicts, infiltration of human
society by breeding program operatives in order to steer humans
toward IFSP objectives), and I'm an active, published critic of
Part of my concern is that they come not
from this galaxy, not even this galaxy group, but from a galaxy
group that is further away from us than are the four nearest galaxy
groups. In other words, there are about 120 or more galaxies of
varying sizes that are closer to us than is the home galaxy of the
The old alien is often overbearing - as though entirely convinced that
he/they know it all, and we know next to nothing. If I cite the fact
that the gray planet was killed during the IFSP intervention there,
he says - but look at how the grays are now (nonsexual,
non-offensive). Again, judging from the old alien’s statements and
those of competing aliens plus the behavior of IFSP aliens, the old
alien’s group may have played a decisive role in designing the
When I criticize the IFSP intervention, I hear critiques from the
old alien like,
"So what is your plan for humankind?"
words, how do I (believe it or not) plan for us to improve
genetically and scale down the crudeness of human sexuality?
It's a non-starter, of course. I'm not a geneticist and I don't plan
a massive intervention by materially motivated aliens (although I do
see how the human future must be). Again, the irony about nonsexual
grays is that Phillip Krapf reports they're led by a huge
sexual population who told Krapf they're called "the Verdants."
In a sense, the very name sounds propagandistic. Verdant
In other words, Verdants tout their
status, for one reason or another, based upon the claim that their
planet is green (implicitly not a lifeless ruin like the old gray
planet or other planets admittedly killed by IFSP intervention).
Stranger still, a man named
Marshall Vian Summers
wrote a book (The Allies of Humanity)
transcribing his conversations with yet another group of aliens.
The aliens reportedly told Summers that
the gray-alignment is engaged in a (prohibited) traffic and sale of
biological materials. In other words, after previously manipulating
a breeding program/infiltration of the old gray planet, the "Verdants"
have the lack of good taste to portray themselves as a native
success story, while the grays and some others are total failures
(yet, lacking their old home planet, now serve the Verdant
I find that coldly insensitive. In my conversations I don't let the
subject rest. Imagine it: a third category of advanced aliens who
accompany both the grays and the Verdants yet are older, predating
them both. The old alien security figure who I've heard from for
years sometimes boasts about how grays (and apparently some Verdants,
also) were more or less designed by his peers. When such statements
are made, they are partly informed by the active, adept inputs of
other, apparently monitoring aliens who clearly rival the old alien.
It's a strange situation: I’m a human
cautious about the dangers of IFSP aliens who try to manipulate
human conflicts toward a certain end (they literally admit
this!) - I argue with them about damages done to humankind while the
old alien goes on about how his group has a better prototype in mind
for this planet.
In other words, he can't think about us or the other lesser aliens
of his alignment as much more than prototypes. We're just
another biological project for him. So, although I cite unnecessary
human casualties, he’s unmoved and immune to feelings for innocents
killed in the process. He only sees a prototypical objective.
Ironically, he, himself, may be the result of genetic engineering
intended to reduce or eliminate what were once considered emotional
vulnerabilities. That may have been a mistake, given the crimes now
coldly rationalized by his kind.
After many years of such crimes, they
seem incapable of comprehending the damage done. Instead, they tend
to regard humans as lower order beings. All of it—the crimes,
Verdant greed, and their own biased self-interest—is rationalized in
terms of a final solution. Although they make token remarks
about how some humans seem to understand the equalitarian social
identity of a larger universe, the old alien’s attitude is worsened
by the assumption that our failure may be their gain. It is
Behavioral psychology shows that
behavior premised on boosting one population’s genetic spread into
another population tends to lapse into primitive impulses and
self-centered, singular assumptions.
Suffice it to say, when the old alien dunders in and patronizes us
in prototypical terms then tries to monopolize all communication and
steer it all towards his alignment's agenda, some competing aliens
(presumably unaffiliated) tend to wait until the air clears.
Ironically, some aliens as aged or pre-existing as the old alien
find it trouble-free to criticize or correct him when he looks bad.
That's what's interesting about his case.
There are others who are
far more evolved (I don't mean this in a prototypical sense, mind
you) than either the grays or the "Verdants."
* Again, I don’t like that name
because it seems to hang the death of target planets around their
victims’ necks - as though they could never equal the simple,
trademark boast of certain Verdants: a surviving, biologically
Ironically, it appears that some Verdants and certainly the old
alien don't want some populations to live on surviving, original
planets. Believe it or not, they prefer to see some planets ruined
because refugees are more vulnerable, more easily led and dependent.
A stable, surviving home planet is a base, a refuge - a place that
natives can retreat to and preserve their own, independent identity.
That could be a problem for the Verdant alignment. Some Verdants
(and certainly the old alien) appear to want ecologically
challenged, sometimes desperate servants for their empire. They want
to absorb aliens who have no alternatives, aliens who will do what
they are told - without causing trouble.
The old alien has threatened me and other people with sown conflict,
abduction, and has unconcernedly threatened people of prominent note
with death (he tries to make it seem as though some ambiguous human
makes the remarks, but after years of doing so he can be seen
through easily). This has caused cautious concern among such humans,
who sense a larger danger.
In one incident of threats and coercions, the “three ellipticals”
alien in question mechanically ordered his subordinate(s) around,
then they made statements of the sort as instructed, essentially a
kind of good cop, bad cop routine. It was too easily, directly
manipulated by the old alien in charge, and it showed that due to my
unusual subject-development (exopolitical dynamics, plus critiques
resonated upon by sympathetic aliens), a callous, long-term offender
has been drawn in to monitor me. I suspect that the old alien,
himself, may have had a possible role, on-scene, in the demise of
the original gray planet. It’s a tricky subject to explore when
(subdued) tempers flare and the issue of how humans will judge it
all is on the line.
* No non-human/hybrid alien in my
experience has yet allowed anger free, visible reign in his or her
Worse yet, the old alien openly, acknowledgingly, tried to silence
discussion of the Thyssen case and he routinely hacks at
others (humans, other aliens, and subordinates) as if he thinks
they’re mostly petty lessers. Meanwhile, he glancingly
criticizes those of us with no mass criminal implication (an
insecure kind of overcompensation). He tries to suggest his group’s
rationale, in defense, but does so murkily at such times.
The most disturbing aspect is how, on
impulse (in order to abort possibly contrary discussion) he presumes
to psychically land upon, threaten, and hack at high profile, noted
humans. He seems to want to draw them in by doing so, while other
aliens (beyond him) want him to look a certain way in doing so.
About eight years ago, he was caught up in ambiguous statements
about being like a military s.o.b. in getting even for any trouble
given to him. In other words, either he or someone else on-the scene
wanted us to know he has a memory to return to such subjects in
order to do so.
He bosses other aliens around, tends to say “we” when redressing
humans—as though humans don’t qualify in such terms, and then he
arrogates a regime attitude toward us, as a globe.
late 2007 incident noted two paragraphs above, he and possibly
interposing, contrary others (who could provide a foil for his
venting) ran ramshackle across a number of hideously wronged people
(the holocaust, AIDS as planted in Africa—along with a directly
racist allusion, and more). It was like hell, for me. Rather than
behave in similarly prejudicial manner, I simply pointed out the
statements and the context to other humans - more a study than
His behavior so neatly fits the profile of the large trading
collective offered by Marshall Summers’
Allies of Humanity sources that it
was astonishing, a textbook case of a ruthless, expansionist agenda.
I try to keep the entire situation open, and I encourage others to
study the whole human common more openly also. We find that the old
alien berates and belittles entire nations at times. Other aliens
try to further elucidate his behaviors, slightly extending them at
intervals in order to make him look a certain way (such is life in
an intelligent universe).
In moments of frustration, he has threatened me directly by stating
that his/the IFSP operatives can be ordered around variously. Some
of his threats seem obsessive, i.e. trying to harshly center on me
(another alien compared it to a person standing in center of the
round gallery of tiered prison cells in the Marion IL federal
penitentiary, forced to listen to menacing harangue by ~aliens).
Not pleasant, of course, but a good person sees beyond such.
My exposes are unusual, some never-before heard or seen, as far as I
know. That owes to sympathetic alien help in
developing a human exopolitical awareness, plus
interspecies interactions in which a sometimes contentious and
bitter dynamic comes into play.
For example, my report about
Thyssen could cause tensions among Jewish populations referred
to the IFSP intervention and a widely-reported “Semitic” enclave in the
Altair star system, yet the report
is honest, as stated. I waited months before discussing it further
The old alien tried to avert my report
about Thyssen. He tried to say that from 1924 (Hitler’s failed beer
hall putsch in Munich) until 1939 (Hitler’s invasion of Poland)
Europe was due for trouble, anyway. He said that the IFSP’s
manipulation of Thyssen hurt Jews in part because they were
materialistic/elitist traders for advantage. However, he later
tried to show how his alignment now has direct advantage over
certain elite Jewish figures (Rothschild
included) such that they can be manipulated to aid in
wracking humankind while playing on elite Israeli sympathy.
* The IFSP plan appears to be to keep
Israel a bloody, unresolved mess in order to set the stage for IFSP
Equally harrowing are the times when the old alien gets frustrated
by my expose (he describes it as naïve), which causes him to state
that he and his cohort can directly
manipulate elite actors in the
US and elsewhere (i.e. via the
Federal Reserve Bank) to block
or sabotage human attempts at expose and independent global order.
It’s a recurring theme.
The old alien is both aware of, and
suggests that he and his cohort can manipulate, the ugliest human
subcultures (i.e. child-kidnapping/child-killing pedophile networks
in elite economies - crimes seen as both covering for, and
offsetting IFSP abductions, IFSP sabotage of human order, and IFSP
control of malign human operatives). He’s careful to not seem too
direct in doing so.
The old alien often plays to the human crowd, sometimes in
equalitarian terms, yet other aliens made him acknowledge direct
IFSP operatives’ role in targeting Africa with a sown AIDS epidemic.
The old alien says there should be no sympathy for JFK’s murder (due
to direct operatives’ prime decision to do the hit) because, after
all, JFK was just
manipulator and he wasn’t even
a direct operative with a clear end goal in sight.
Steven Greer’s book
Hidden Truth argues that JFK was
hit in part to thwart his move toward minimal disclosure about
aliens back in 1963-4.
* There have been guarded remarks by
the old alien’s peers about how “we’re sorry” about some crimes
against humanity, along with mention that humans weren’t expected to
know this much at this time.
The old alien(s) says that Australian journalist Roland Perry’s
thesis - about how Victor Rothschild was both a leading British
financier and a leading Soviet spy - is basically correct. Perry’s
book on the subject,
The Fifth Man, is detailed and
Apparently, the old alien wants us to think that Rothschilds didn’t merely favor greed and wealth. Instead, he wants
us to think that IFSP-operative Rothschilds worked on challenges to
such greed. Rothschild may have attempted to manipulate human
conflicts toward IFSP advantage (i.e. a flimsy hope that humans will
continue to honor the mere paper claims of IFSP operatives).
And when critiques arise over a
direct operative Rothschild/Rockefeller role in cults and sexual
mind control operatives, the old
alien and his cohort sometimes makes claims about Jesus —
again, playing to the crowd.
The behavior of the old alien show how a mind that has participated
in manipulated mass offenses no longer has the sensitivities needed
to assure good relations and a real end to conflict. He rationalizes
all in terms of his group's objective.
When the old alien displays trappings of his command over the second
“three ellipticals” alien (a hybrid) and other IFSP aliens, he seems
to gloat. It isn’t a human kind of gloating, but a dispassionate,
hardened-to-routine kind of pride. It coldly rationalizes the fact
that he’s tasked to a planet-killing, sexuals’ empire. He rarely
uses alternative-cycle technology as a non-lethal weapon (here, i.e. on me)
when his command and integrity is challenged, but he’s quick to try
to thwart communications and discussion that faults him. All of this
is characteristic of a military-like structure (i.e.
inflexibility that can lead to the failure of analytical and
There’s a more disturbing aspect of his behavior—an alien behavior
like that in the famous
Milgram experiments (emotional
cruelty, ability to inflict fatal harm): the ability to coldly
escalate dangerous and destructive doings in a stimulus-response
way. It’s less marked and more subdued than a human version, of
course. Perhaps, as noted in previous pages, it’s better referenced
as an alien sort of
Trapped within an operational scheme
that he, himself, admits is premised on maximum, opportunistic
corruption (here - as if we can’t see that it’s that way elsewhere,
also), he seems unable to admit that it is both failing and
unecological. He only sees the goal: takeover, control, and a
manipulated conflicts/pacification scheme (while others of his kind
leak weak, deeply stifled hints that the IFSP’s direct operatives
could be rolled up, yet imply that to do so is intended to bring us
into the IFSP orbit).
Some of his associates try to cover their rears by saying there’s a
deeper layer that foresees IFSP failure here followed by human
awareness of Verdant-like extremes of corruption, but this is also
cold and potentially Munchausen-like. Worse yet, the same
inflict-harm-then-pretend-to-save-victims pattern may correspond to
the given regime’s planet-kill scenarios, i.e. the one now being
prepared here by their direct operatives.
Once, after I’d elicited a statement
that the old alien’s associates (perhaps the old alien, also) had
actually witnessed the gray planet-kill while tasked there, the old
alien appeared to gloat in some subtle way, as though he enjoyed the
sense of power and control he had over those who’d heard the remark.
It was a deeply disturbing moment.
* Other old order aliens may have set
up and colored the situation for humans to witness. They certainly
pointed out the old alien, at the time.
We see that individuals in the “three ellipticals” section lack some
human sensitivities, which should, perhaps, be expected of aliens
working on so crude an assignment. They tend to dismiss atrocious
crimes of their nearly human operatives as though it isn’t so real
to them, as though humans are merely low-order animals. So, like
Bush Sr., they all seem distorted - sometimes mousy and
unformed as individuals. They all lean into the cold structure that
sustains them. Of course, they might say that detachment is a
From the old alien’s perspective, however,
the subordinate aliens and human operatives are easy to manipulate.
The old alien tends to react with subdued scorn and detachment when
bothersome details and reminders of the regime’s dysfunction reach a
certain threshold. At such times, we see reactive, potentially
dangerous responses, much like the overindulged, racist contempt of
human imperialists (frustrated, dysfunctional angst and thoughts of
violence when reminders of others intrude). In the “three
ellipticals” case it centers on a different set of circumstances and
is much more subdued but is essentially the same: aberrant,
reactive, corrupt, and potentially destructive.
Psychological susceptibilities of the
sort may be common among offending regimes. Due to deficiencies in
various sections of the “three ellipticals”/IFSP regime, there’s a
lean - a falling into group agenda that can, at times, only cohere
within presumption and extreme detachment. We see cold, killer
manipulations followed by extreme detachment.
Some of the weirdest moments for me are when, for the human
community, I point out sheltered IFSP hybrids tasked to coordinate
the ugliest, most deadly IFSP manipulations of humankind. At such
times, I inflate the perspective to allow other humans to see them
clearly and check on their doings, and although the hybrids are
obvious and unmistakable to humans, the hybrids just sit there,
aware that they’re being monitored, yet unconcerned because they
think they have it over us and we can’t access them physically.
There’s a coldly antisocial kind of glare, a detachment in them that
they seem to immerse in—as though it’s supposed to scare us off.
They lean into the three ellipticals routine as though we could
never get anywhere near them.
Meanwhile, the “three ellipticals”/IFSP regime’s advanced technology
provides its aliens with pleasant psychotronic conditioning to
abate, if not obliterate, internal reminders of mass harm done to a
target population (which is seen as genetically, technologically,
and socially lesser). As a result, within the regime there’s an
idealistic remove from conditions that exist outside of the regime,
a lack of critical thinking.
This is enforced by
controls and fear among the regime’s dependents, who
sometimes actually see or hear about the harm done to target
populations like humankind. Given the removal of troublemaker or
emotional genes within the regime, the end result can be a
dangerously handicapped group climate. The larger the arrangement
grows, the less the internal critique and the more easily its
members can rationalize wrongdoing for the regime’s agenda.
In the Verdant case, “Gina” told Krapf that 9-11 violence had
caused the IFSP to think humans unfit for diplomatic relations
with the IFSP.
That’s most ironic because in late 2004 competing hyperversal alien sources explicitly alleged, and partly
demonstrated, that to some extent the
9-11 attacks were remotely steered,
promoted and guided toward completion by IFSP manipulators - we
even viewed the two, onboard IFSP individuals (either late-stage
hybrids or nearly “human”) tasked to make sure Bin Laden and
Zawahiri followed through (this ability to view them was
helped and steered by critical hyperversal aliens).
The two IFSP
individuals were sitting at an alien panel of some sort, doing their
Ironically, when notified that they were being pointed out by other
aliens helping humans see it all, they barely budged, as though they
felt entirely secure in their environment. One was thin with an
angular face, dark skin and hair like that of a Mediterranean human,
while the other was slightly more stout and more direct-seeming
(also dark haired and dark eyed). To the extent that I could do so,
I noted that their skin and health appeared better than most humans,
and their attitude was relatively airy—as though not vulnerable to
the typical perils of life on this planet.
After years of experience with aliens,
one notes such characteristics quickly.
* The report about an IFSP role in
effectively steering such deadly events created a major stir, here,
to say the least, and was followed by our repeated checks,
counterchecks and testing, which basically supported the
hyperversals’ report. In other words, Verdant Gina’s behavior was a
prime example of how offenders of the sort can spin on their heels
with infantile, regime assumptions, and say, as Gina did, that she
thinks humans will “blow up” Earth. Of course, Gina, may not have
known about the actions of higher ranking IFSP aliens.
The psychological distortions, the violence and marginally primitive
behaviors that we see among “three elliptical” and IFSP aliens are
part of a long history of disproportionate rake of resources, epic
extremes of travel, indulgence (however “equalitarian” among the
Verdant elite) and cold, killer detachment. Some of it is best
studied as a kind of animal behavior.
We’ve seen how aberrant, offending character can be spooled out into
a nominally social context, hence regarded as correct and
transparent even though it tends to collapse into the singular
dimensions of personality disorder. We see communitarian
psychologies that deny individuality yet are fraught with specious,
In the above case, the offenders spew poison
into another people’s planet (i.e. HIV-via the direct
operatives—again, as helpful hyperversal sources specifically state
was done by the IFSP’s operatives.
* See also: similar allegations in
re a Bush/Cheney
conversation about the project at
Bohemian Grove; Dr.
Michael Wolf’s allegations
about HIV on Richard Boylan’s site; and Harvard medical professor
book, Emerging Viruses).
The old alien listens to human arguments about crimes committed by
his alignment yet he remains resolute. Despite coming from a distant
location, his group sees an opportunity here. They appear to have
personal genetic motives, or at least their own genetic inputs in
mind, when viewing our population. At times, their bias is obvious.
By framing nearly all that they do here in terms of changing the
human genetic makeup, they easily rationalize the IFSP’s crimes
The old alien acts as an overseer,
a role that he wants us to think is only indirect and advisory—while
the evidence appears to suggest otherwise.
It’s easy for him to patronize a younger population like our own. We
still suffer the cumulative handicaps of an isolated, classist
history. We’re relatively new to larger interactions.
However, there’s one obvious yet easily
overlooked aspect of the old alien’s population that we shouldn’t
forget. His society originated billions of years ago.
For various reasons, they decided to
embark on a breeding and resource campaign to outnumber other,
competing aliens. We can expect to see other cases of the sort but
in the old alien’s case, a long history of corruptions, conflicts,
political contortions and arrogations (not the whole story, of
course) have made his population almost compulsive about wanting
to control others before others become a challenge to them.
There’s a faint margin of ecological
logic in that (if balanced by competing populations who provide a
check on such offenders), yet such assumptions can breed extremes of
arrogance, i.e. the 500 trillion Verdant sexuals still trying to
take more planets for themselves.
When populations like humankind become aware of alien norms and
interactions, there are pressures to compete and to study older
aliens to see what, if anything, is wrong with them.
like that of the old alien comes with so much contradictory baggage,
so many fixed assumptions, that we have to ask:
Although they’re highly if not totally
reliant on technology, are they in some ways slightly primitive when
compared to more sympathetic, more modestly proportioned aliens?
In other words, do we strive to simply
emulate some ancient alien past, or do we learn from them in order
to create a better, more equal future?