AlienMind

The Verdants

 

9. - A Mega-Population Problem Case
Phillip Krapf reports that when he visited the Verdant ship he was told that in the past, Verdants opted for a genetically selective, non-sexual reproduction strategy but later chose to return to sexuality.

 

A Verdant told Krapf that the reversion to sexuality cost them a significant part of their intellectual ability. If such is the case, then why did they do so? For some strange reason, no single Verdant explained their reasoning. The omission speaks volumes about the larger Verdant outlook.

A closer look at the case suggests that Verdants may have done so in order to outnumber a competing population in their home galaxy. Given recent developments in human astronomy, plus non-IFSP aliens’ comments about Verdant history, we can now construct a scenario for that phase of Verdant history.

Those who briefly studied the website showing our location in the universe (above images or visit this website) will certainly appreciate the following. The beautiful, star-studded swirl that we call the Milky Way is part of a group of some 40 galaxies in the local group, which features our galaxy at one end, and the equally inspiring spirals Andromeda and M-33 at the other end.

 

The two Magellenic Clouds and numerous smaller ellipticals complete the picture. Moving counter clockwise as seen from above, the next nearest galaxy groups (all similar in size to our group) are: Sculptor, Maffei, M-81, and the Canes I group - which billows out into the Virgo supercluster, a relatively small supercluster, as the universe goes.

The fifth closest galaxy group is Centaurus A, which may hold the answer to why grays and other Verdant-related aliens have abducted humans on a massive scale. If, as Krapf reports, the Verdant galaxy is 14 million light years away, then the most likely candidate, in terms of size and habitability, would be the large spiral galaxy M-83 (click image left). Competing aliens have repeatedly suggested that M-83 is the Verdant home galaxy.

 

While interacting with the pre-noted human telepathic community, one advanced alien communicated an explicit map in such regard. Another advanced alien remarked that the Verdants have prematurely “cooked” M-83 by overusing electrogravity on a massive scale.

 

He suggested that, by doing so, the Verdants may have caused certain supernovae in M-83 to explode prematurely, thus decimating biological planets. When this last remark was stated, there was a brief exchange between a Verdant and the alleging alien. The allegation stood unchallenged. Again, this was observed by a number of different humans.

Some may ask whether we should trust such aliens’ reports. In response, I should note that some of the alien contingents who visit our vicinity are on serious, and in some cases, potentially life-threatening watch (for other aliens).

 

To even be here, in our vicinity tending to such matters from a distance can be risky. No alien wants to be responsible for a Verdant seizure of their technologies, which Verdants reportedly study and sometimes try to copy. For example, a few years ago, Elder aliens specifically reported a previous Verdant seizure of an Elder craft, the hull of which was made of hybridized living materials that allowed it to reconfigure in cold, empty space.

Apparently, given that the ecology of our planet and that of surrounding galaxy groups may be jeopardized by a colonial’s incursion, competing alien sources feel a need to tell the truth about Verdants. Some alien contingents are so much more advanced than the Verdants that they don’t feel threatened. Instead, they appear to tend to the Verdants in terms of a larger ecological context.

Should recent reports prove wrong, however, the next most likely candidate for the Verdant galaxy would be NGC 4945, M-83’s close neighbor.

 

NGC 4945 (click image right) is a slightly larger spiral than is M-83. Meanwhile, the galaxy that clearly dominates spiral M-83’s galaxy group is Centaurus A, a much larger elliptical (nearly round) galaxy.

 

According to recent astronomers’ data, Centaurus A is the product of a merger between two large galaxies that was completed some 10 million years ago---before the present view, that is.

 

Centaurus A is some 12.4 million light years away from us. Astronomers say the merger may have begun as much as 500 million years ago. Some suggest that it is now a large elliptical with a strange dust lane around its perimeter because it’s a large elliptical that absorbed a modest spiral galaxy about the size of our close neighbor galaxy, M-33.

Let’s continue our scenario about the Verdant home galaxy. For the sake of the argument, let’s assume that the Verdant galaxy is M-83, as has been repeatedly suggested by the alien sources noted above. As such, we may now have enough data to posit an explanation for the Verdants’ aggressive population growth.

 

According to Phillip Krapf’s report, the Verdants developed electrogravity technology some 229,000,000 years ago. Given that other advanced populations probably existed near M-83 at the time, Verdants could have copied electrogravity technology from such aliens, much as humans copied downed gray alien technology more recently.

According to astronomers, M83 has a double nucleus, a double center, which suggests that, like our neighboring galaxy Andromeda, M83 has nearly completed a merger with a smaller galaxy. Assuming that there were intelligent residents in both of the merging components, the merger may have spurred the Verdants to be more competitive. Verdants may have worried that merging aliens might out-populate the Verdants in M83. That, in turn, may be why Verdants ended their non-sexual status in order to out-populate competitors.

Other pressures may have sped Verdant population growth (numbering 500 trillion, at present, writes Krapf). Beginning as much as 229,000,000 million years ago, Verdants may have seen the pending merger of two nearby galaxies (now combined in the galaxy Centaurus A) as a threat to their domain—for one simple reason. Some residents of the soon-to-merge galaxies would have scouted M-83’s stars for future homes because their soon-to-form large elliptical galaxy would be hot and dangerous. Beginning as much as 100 million years ago, an incursion into M-83 by populations fearing the merger would have alarmed Verdants.

 

Had encroaching aliens taken unoccupied systems in M-83, the Verdants would have wondered whether Verdants would control their own fate or see their galaxy sped toward a habitable end in advance of its “normal” lifetime (due to Bearden’s *t, the speeding of time caused by the use of electrogravity).

 

Acting out of fear, Verdants may have been further motivated to overpopulate and expand their domain in order to ward off further incursions. Perhaps they saw that Centaurus A refugees might gain footholds in other large spirals of the vicinity: the galaxies NGC4945 and E274-01.

Refugees fleeing Centaurus A (click image left) would have had good reason to be afraid. Earth astronomers see two huge, cone-shaped remnants of what is called a “hyper-nova” extending out from opposite sides of a massive black hole in the center of Centaurus A, which is now a large elliptical (round-shaped) galaxy.

 

Hyper-novae caused by the merger of two star-sized black holes are the most violently explosive events yet observed within the universe. The hypernova that reportedly exploded in Centaurus A more than 10 million years ago probably involved black holes that contained millions of solar masses, hence the event was cataclysmic.

 

Given that two merging galaxies deform as they merge, causing some stars to plunge toward hot central regions of the new galaxy, the Centaurus A hypernova would have been alarming. If left unshielded, thousands of potentially habitable planets would have been rendered unlivable.

 

In fact, the Centaurus A hypernova suggests what may happen on a lesser scale during a future merger of black holes within M-83’s double center.

 

* M-83 is considered an “active galaxy” because it emits more radio and infrared energy from its central active region, perhaps due to its double center. M-83 is known for an unusual number of supernova explosions.
Let’s continue the scenario.

 

Presumably, according to one NASA report issued several years ago, “life is ubiquitous” throughout the universe. Early life forms eventually evolve into higher intelligence in all habitable regions of all habitable galaxies. Given that the vast majority of visible stars lie within galaxy superclusters, it’s only logical to assume that supercluster social forms and supercluster constraints on overpopulation should, in theory, prevail across the universe.

 

In a sense, in much the same way that New York and the world’s major population centers figure in comparison to Waco, Texas, for example, superclusters should be more challenging, yet more integrated and urbane than are outlying areas like the Verdant galaxy group.

Of course, the two-cities analogy falls short in illustrating likely differences. Suffice it to say, the Verdants may be an oversized but relatively backward population (socially, albeit not necessarily technologically---Verdants are highly intelligent). It’s possible that in some respects, the Verdants may have failed to accord with the larger supercluster ecology because they didn’t organize a collective accommodation of Centaurus A refugees within their galaxy group. Instead, Verdants may have bred to an extreme over the last 100 million years in order to outnumber competitors in M-83 and keep Centaurus A incursions to a minimum.

In one alternative scenario based upon direct quotes by more advanced “hyperversal” aliens of our vicinity who pre-date humans by billions of years, the Verdants were greedy, self-rationalizing expansionists. In late 2004, the given hyperversals explicitly stated that the Verdants embarked on their population blitz due to a struggle for control of the original Verdant galaxy.

 

For example, according to Krapf’s figures taken from direct Verdant quotes, Verdants take 14 planets for themselves for every 1 occupied by another species in the IFSP. Worse yet, Verdants populate at 4 times the rate that all of the other IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) populations do, on average, a dangerously unbalanced ratio.

 

Faced with a potential problem, it appears that a categorically more advanced population decided to steer Verdants outward as part of a strategy of eco-tensions - in part to give eco offenders reason to moderate, in part to show the Verdants as a teaching example of a failing ecology. There have been specific remarks by more advanced, “hyperversal” aliens to this effect (see later chapter about hyperversals).

 

Another hyperversal alien faction that’s highly critical of the Verdants pointed out that a Verdant-abetting hyperversal faction has gone out of its way to find and identify emerging planets for the Verdants to target in search of conscripts. After learning of this, I and other humans probed and queried the Verdant-abetting hyperversal aliens, who monitor the Verdants closely. They eventually admitted that Verdants have, in fact, been steered toward planets like Earth.

There seems to be a statistical spread in the given hyperversals’ scheme. They appear to encourage intergalactic interactions, in part to cultivate a better awareness between galaxies, in part to develop a check on offenders like the Verdants. As a result, when the people of a planet like Earth begin to learn about aliens and electrogravity, we quickly gets a sense of intergalactic politics, plus the need for a larger universal ecology. Apparently, Verdants are also expected to learn by their encounter with humans, a kind of lesson that seems to proceed but one world (or galaxy) at a time.

In short, both of the Verdant expansion scenarios above appear to have at least some validity. Judging by all reports, millions of years ago the Verdants decided to outnumber their local competitors.

Fateful ironies would have followed. Overpopulation leads to greater needs: career pressures, resource grabs, the wayward impulses of those who want to participate in exotic foreign adventures.

 

According to Phillip Krapf’s remarkable journals, the Verdants are sexuals who are prone to territoriality and the sometimes clouded judgment that sexuality engenders. In this respect, as in most others, we see a subtler shading than is noted in humans.

 

Nonetheless, we can assume that some in the Verdant bureaucracy suffer neurotic pitfalls that surround the circus-like manipulation of lesser, off-world peoples. Due to the internal preoccupations of their far-flung government, in times of crisis Verdant crews will be pressured to conform to a colonial paradigm. As sometimes happens within intelligent sub-cultures, the sexually-related weaknesses of the Verdant elite can be flipped, in a sense, and come to be regarded as positive attributes, rather than impulsive failings.

As a result, a typical Verdant may regard humans as minor neophytes from a backward planet and think that Verdants are perfectly right to intervene here because Verdants are more knowledgeable. After all, Verdants engage in a vastly larger endeavor. Judging from the reports of numerous sources, Verdant IFSP propaganda says that humans need to be “saved” from the ravages of their lesser nature before planet Earth is ruined.

 

However, few Verdants will confess that part of the breeding program seeks to infiltrate and gain control over vital human sectors. In Krapf’s books, Verdants admit having done that to other planets, and competing aliens allege that Verdants are doing it here, also.

So, how do Verdants rationalize their aggressive strategy millions of years after their home galaxy power struggles? Without realizing it, Verdants sometimes communicate internal assumptions about their elite qualification to administer others’ affairs, plus other messages relating to a culture of fear surrounding bureaucratic challenges to any given Verdant’s competency. Within the vast colonial hierarchy, such challenges are de rigeur because Verdants are often seen supervising younger, less technologically advanced aliens from non-Verdant planets.

 

To stay on top, Verdants must be coldly manipulative, especially during an intervention. In numerous disputes with Verdants, I’ve noted this pattern repeatedly. For example, when intruded upon personally, or when I note a violation of humans in general, I sometimes probe and remotely test an entire Verdant crew for details of their past and present intentions here. This is done in flash-like bursts across a larger configuration space (not in the sense of visible bursts) because it’s a hyper-dynamic involving the negative cycle outlined in previous pages.

Sometimes, in response, lesser crewmembers try to demonstrate their skill at diverting me from identifying a Verdant overseer, all the while resonating in masculinized, subcultural terms. Their version of masculinized resonance is less rough-edged and usually more intelligent than what one might expect among contained-craft humans, yet it occurs fairly often and has been noted by a number of human observers.

 

Sometimes I even encounter non-sexual aliens whose intermediaries verge on masculinized characterizations, albeit infrequently. In particular, there is one hyper-advanced population of larger circulation that I refer to as the –X3’s, who, along with hybrid intermediaries, tend to the Verdant case in a variety of ways.

 

* More about the –X3’s and other “hyperversal” aliens in a following chapter.

Speaking for myself, having long been identified as critical of Verdant-gray intentions here, I’ve endured thousands of hours of mostly uninvited remote interactions with IFSP aliens— sometimes of a passive nature. However, some of it has been threatening and has, at times, been tangentially framed in terms of a Verdant connection to one leading US military-industrial family (formerly French monarchists named Biderman and Du Pont) in part known for its ties to organized crime plus a previous family affinity for fascism and a leading role in what is known as the anti-alien black budget “Cabal,” ironically - which suggests an attempt to play both sides of the fence off of each other, for advantage.

 

Native Milky Way and other advanced aliens have repeatedly pointed out that part of the given US family (the formerly Swiss branch: Biedermann) was “direct” Verdant operative, possibly a result of the breeding program. The news caused quite a stir, here, among the human community because it corroborated a long-running pattern of thinly veiled verbal threats to humans, a strategy of tension that such aliens have pursued for years to the chagrin of a growing host of humans. As a result, there have been sustained, finely networked efforts to probe the suspects in such regard. The results have been disturbing, frankly.

As is reported in following chapters, non-IFSP aliens who criticize Verdant overkill have repeatedly reported that the IFSP has “direct operatives” in a number of specific cases on this planet, one of whom is reportedly within “the Biderman part of the Du Pont family” - the largest, perhaps most reactionary arms manufacturer in the United States with a long history of supporting death squads and underworld finance.

 

Another reported “direct operative” is a noted French financier named “Rothschild,” whose family first appeared on a major scale by funding both Napoleon’s adventures and his British opponents.

At first glance, reports about “direct operatives” of the sort high in the human economy may sound strange, yet given the large, long-term strategy of the IFSP, we should expect to see highly-placed direct human operatives. From the Verdant perspective they would be useful and would help to assure that long-term IFSP mobilizations (and abductions for breeding purposes) achieve their desired goal. Earth wouldn’t be the first case of the sort.

 

One Verdant told Krapf that the Verdant IFSP inserted direct operatives high into the social line-up on (at least) two other planets.

* Those familiar with US history will recall that the Bush family has long been a willing, if not obedient, part of the Du Pont-Dulles faction of the CIA, perhaps the most corrupt of factions. Non-federation aliens have gone so far as to state that George Bush Sr. is also, in some way, a “direct operative” of the IFSP, as weird as that may sound to some readers. The point has been stated repeatedly and with emphasis, so it may be important. The subject was later probed by a broad network of humans, with deeply disturbing results.

 

I’ll explain how this is done, in later pages.

 

Having done graduate study in US history, and having worked as an investigative reporter, I wouldn’t report the quotes unless they were:

a) repeated numerous times so that a variety of humans could pick up on them

b) were later investigated to check for direct personal indications let slip by Bush Sr., himself

Informative alien mention was also made of a direct operative named “Gold,” apparently a Jewish financial figure in New York City. A leading Saudi family was also noted. It would appear that Verdants have a multi-fold strategy for manipulating the human situation, at present. They may be more ruthless than some might expect.

More generally speaking, Verdants appear to have a foreign policy that places their empire-of-sorts at the center of all related consideration, from which all other concerns are imagined to radiate outward. Some Verdants seem to have been spoiled by the luxury of distant travels, the option to live and work on literally thousands of planets, plus the chance to study and manipulate lesser populations up-close.

 

I’ve detected a subdued but droning kind of lust for sexual adventure among the most coldly dysfunctional old stalwarts. Apparently, some of the worst cases of the sort are shipped out to work on the most distant, most primitive planets targeted for colonization---like planet Earth, for example.

After years of working in such places, some old Verdants become almost hopelessly corrupted. Imagine what they go through: first they must breed an obedient surrogate population to help tend to, and mix with the peoples of the target planet. Such projects involve the inculcation of primitive belief systems, delusional constructs prone to schizophrenic pitfalls. Wars must be influenced toward an eventually pro-federation outcome.

 

IFSP operatives must be positioned to gain influence over organized crime structures on the target planet, and breeding program operatives must be placed so that they control the maximum amount of money and resources without being exposed for their loyalty to the Verdant colonial scheme. To some readers this surely sounds strange: corrupt aliens. To those who know the history of colonialism, it should come as no surprise, however. Humans aren’t the only kind that can do wrong.

In the end, Verdants who tend to colonial targets can, themselves, be casualties because they become too dangerous to return to more psychologically refined postings elsewhere. Some are relegated to barren outposts like the planet that Phillip Krapf’s Verdant contact described, a Verdant way station, here, in the Milky Way.

Ultimately, we must ask, how can Verdants maintain so large yet isolated a string of planets? How do they prevent the peoples of such planets from assimilating with their neighbors?

 

Stark differences between crude Verdant colonial operatives and other, more finely-cultured Verdant specialists suggest that, like destructive cases of militarism on Earth, Verdants, too, have devised a stifled, if not infantile kind of citizenship.

 

To publish ugly details about their most aggressive foreign policy failures would loosen the cohesion of the larger empire. So, presumably, they glaze the cake - they overwhelm the Verdant citizenry with more positive news and scientific reports about their many planets.

The patronizing attitudes of Verdant crewmembers I’ve encountered speak volumes in this regard. I’ve seen Verdants who will directly and intrusively impinge upon any human, irregardless of stature, i.e. the long-running pattern of thinly-veiled threats noted above (which, to say the least, has become cause for concern among human officials). At one time, pre-emptive impulses of the sort may have helped the Verdants maintain their independence in the face of a challenge. However, that was during a relatively primitive age, compared to the current inter-alien context. In a sense, humans are lucky to begin within a more advanced time.

In the end, like the human disaster of WWII, the mergers within M-83 and Centaurus A would have contributed to a burgeoning Verdant security apparatus that ultimately defeated its own original purpose: to preserve the long-term ecology. Worse yet, in order to maintain their hold on non-Verdant conscript planets, Verdants would have to surround such planets with an overbearing defense and technology structure in order to cut them off from neighbors with whom they might otherwise affiliate, then stray.

 

This may be why Verdants and Grays have reportedly developed limited human-hybrid offshoot colonies on several planets near our solar system, ironically. Ultimately, to proceed at such effort and expense would be costly, tempting Verdants to “mine” the vicinity’s resources in order to profit by the interaction.

Unlike what happened in the Verdant case, well-managed galaxy mergers will hasten mixed alien integrations and the refinement of electrogravity technologies, while placing a limit on population growth. Indeed, some newly-merged ellipticals galaxies may be exemplary in this regard. By reducing their populations in advance and by jointly sharing a newly-merged galaxy, they can set a higher standard.

Meanwhile, the coalescence of M-83’s double nucleus is long past and the 'Centaurus A' hypernova crisis was more than 10 million years ago, yet Verdants haven’t managed to correct their specious impulses.

 

What single voice, what given Verdant planet would be sufficient to change the expansionist policy of so large and unwieldy a population? None, of course.

 

The most likely solution would be a collective security arrangement between all of the galaxy groups that surround the Verdant home group, an arrangement that should eventually include us.

 

Alternatively, the greatest chance for reform of the Verdant empire may lie within a coalition of disparate, non-Verdant planets who may try to democratize the Verdant-dominated “federation” from within (even if they are a minority). There are other, more advanced possibilities, including the largely veiled interventions of hyper-advanced populations who greatly exceed the Verdants.

In my own experience, Verdant males have figured in coldly detached manipulations intended to take advantage of human misconceptions. Meanwhile, Verdant females, like human females, seem to be better adjusted than are their male counterparts.

 

Were Verdant females to control their government, it would probably be more ecological. Nonetheless, in a lighter moment, one hyper-advanced (non-federation) alien remarked that Verdant females are characterized by an unusual “presence” of mind—a tongue-in-cheek criticism of the more immediate, stimulus-seeking awareness that sexuality engenders.

Like Michael Moore’s recent argument that the United States is really a progressive people just waiting to prevail (64% female and non-white), most of the universe is probably either female or non-sexual, which should help to tilt the scales toward larger, nonviolent interactions.

The Verdant case helps to underscore the differences between sexuals and non-sexuals, the problems that can arise among populations who fail to control their growth. Indeed, we now hear competing aliens’ criticisms of the Verdants stated in precisely such terms. Milky Way aliens should be concerned: the Verdant incursion here is neither a legitimate case of need, nor does it appear to be entirely consistent with a supercluster ecology. Instead, it has been criticized as a security risk to this galaxy, which brings us back to planet Earth, where abductions continue.

To place the Verdants in context, it helps to remember that Verdants reportedly number 500 trillion individuals, in total. In the year 2000, one alien of a Milky Way coalition noted above reported, here, that the largest single population native to the Milky Way numbers “38 trillion” individuals.

 

Assuming such numbers (essentially the only ones that we have to date) the largest reported mega-population in the Milky Way would occupy some ten or thirteen thousand planets, if the Verdant ratio of advanced aliens per planet holds true here, also.

 

In addition, we can assume that some more advanced “hyperversal” aliens (part of a universal network of various hyperversals) reside within the Milky Way. They may interact with, and at least partly constitute every major galaxy’s largest coalitions. As such, the Milky Way would more closely approximate a desired universal ecology.

Reckless population growth like that of the Verdants (reportedly 13 times more numerous than the largest Milky Way population) would be destabilizing. Moreover, if Krapf’s figures are correct, Verdants take 14 planets for themselves for every new member planet that joins them, a dangerously skewed and undemocratic ratio.

 

* Note: In late May 2004, one hyper-advanced alien mentioned that a neighboring population of hyperversals (who I refer to as “the –X3’s”) is either 1.5 times as numerous as the Verdants, or some 1.5 quadrillion in number—yet this last quote was so fleeting, albeit resonated variously later, that it should be regarded as tenuous. There may be more to the story. A later chapter discusses the –X3’s and other “hyperversals.”

Over time, Verdants could easily tax the resources of their home galaxy, which may be why Verdants now spill out in search of other galaxies’ raw materials. Worse yet, Verdants may want to speed the electrogravity clock on other galaxies, thus shortening their duration, rather than expend the energy lifetime of their home galaxy.

 

Phillip Krapf quotes one Verdant as saying that Verdants have tentatively occupied at least one planet in the Milky Way, which suggests that, in part, Verdants seek human affiliation in order to rubber stamp their expansionist policy. Human capitulation to such a scheme could put us at odds with native Milky Way and other aliens, if not cut us off altogether.

 

Why is that?

 

Consider the following.