by Phillip S. Duke Ph.D.

from AlienAbduction Website
 

 

Part 1
 

The AIDS-ET Connection Hypothesis is a new, unifying scientific concept, which logically and simply explains and unifies the known facts relating to HIV/AIDS and Ufology (the study of Unidentified flying objects). Like any hypothesis, it is in the least well established stage of scientific knowledge, and provides a guideline for further study, investigation, and possible modification.

HIVs are Human Immuno Deficiency Viruses. After infection they replicate primarily in specific cells of the human immune system, especially T-4 lymphocytes, and by eventually killing these cells thereby weaken the immune system. When the immune system is weakened enough multiple opportunistic infections occur, due to attack by a variety of otherwise medically uncommon microorganisms. The resultant disease conditions are collectively termed Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome or AIDS. Although appropriate medical treatment may be very helpful concerning delaying the onset of and reducing the severity of AIDS, AIDS is commonly considered an eventually lethal disease.

HIV is present in all the body fluids of infected persons. Infection is commonly spread by transfer of virus in body fluids, especially blood and semen. After infection there is a variable latent asymptomatic period of about on average 10 years, during which in the absence of laboratory tests infected persons will not know they are both infected and infectious. Infection can occur in utero, by passage through the birth canal or by nursing. Infected newborns usually die of AIDS within a few years.

HIVs are retroviruses employing RNA transcriptase for replication. This enzyme is notoriously prone to transcription errors in replication, so that the viruses rapidly change genetically (mutate). This rapid mutation rate works to make production of a generally effective preventive vaccine virtually impossible. It also insures that in time strains will arise resistant to all chemical treatments (1-3).

At this time world wide epidemics (pandemics) of HIVs are in progress. The number of HIV infected persons and AIDS cases world wide is unknown but believed to be rapidly increasing. (4). A noted authority states the epidemicís spread is exponential, justifying cataclysmic expectations (1 p. 195).(2)

The geographical and general time origin of HIVs.AIDS was first seen in America when otherwise healthy young homosexual (gay) men presented to a San Francisco (west coast) physician in 1979. Several months other such cases in gay men were recognized in New York (on the east coast) (1).

An African physician near Zimbabwe (central Africa), reading about AIDS in an American Medical Journal, recognized the same syndrome in Africa, but affecting heterosexuals of both sexes, and newborns (2).

HIV appears to have emerged in Africa about the same time as in the United States. (2 p. 367). In 1984 Drs. Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier jointly received credit for the discovery of a new virus, infection with which caused AIDS. The virus was named HIV. In 1983 Dr. Montagnier isolated a HIV from the blood of a west African who, though dying of AIDS, repeatedly tested negative for HIV. This new HIV is genetically quite different from all the African and American strains of HIV. It is believed to have been present initially in western Africa and western India (6).

 

The jointly discovered virus is now termed HIV-1, the Montagnier discovered virus HIV-2. The strain of HIV-1 discovered in America was originally homosexually but not heterosexually infectious. The HIV-1 and HIV-2 discovered in Africa were and are heterosexually infective (1,2). All HIVs are readily transmissible through blood and blood products. All HIVs may be transmissible in utero, by passage through the birth canal, or by nursing. All HIVís can cause AIDS.

Accepted research on the origin of the different HIV pandemics indicates that they all evidently originated at close to the same time (around 1950) in five different widely distant locations; central and western Africa, both coasts of America, and western India.

  • the central African strain was a heterosexually infective HIV-1

  • the east and west coast American strains were homosexually infective HIV-1

  • the western Africa and western India strains were heterosexually infective HIV-2

This is what authorities such as Dr. Mirko Grmek and others who have studied the situation believe (1-4).

According to the above, HIVs all originated as a minimum in at least three genetically distinctly different strains (two of HIV-1 and one of HIV-2), two of which (HIV-1s and HIV-2) are so extremely different genetically that one could not have arisen from the other. These HIVs then infected susceptible gay and non-gay subjects in five different locations, on two distant continents, all at close to the same time. Note that each human infection would have had to occur shortly after each (unique) viral origination, because HIVs are rapidly inactivated outside the human body (3).

The foregoing established, scientifically accepted circumstances concerning the originations of the different strains of HIV-1 and HIV-2 and their resultant pandemics, indicate clearly that the origination of the HIVs and the resultant pandemics evidently cannot have occurred naturally. (1 p. 153).

I mention that for a microorganism strain to arise which was previously entirely unknown, because harmless or non-existent, and produce major human pandemics, is an occurrence previously unknown to both medical science and human history.

For all this to have occurred naturally is essentially impossible.

Nature simply does not work this way. Again, this troubling conclusion is the opinion of the world authority on the history of HIV/AIDS Mirko Grmek M.D. Ph.D. and others (1,4)
 

 


Theories of HIV and pandemic originations (3)

Due to the fact that numerous investigators have come to the conclusion that HIVs and their pandemics cannot have originated naturally, several hypotheses involving purposeful creation and origination have been proposed to explain what happened. Prior to my hypothesis these were all iatrogenic (physician caused) or human conspiratorial theories. (2 p. 380). My hypothesis is a non-human conspiratorial concept.

All the conspiratorial theories are politically undesirable. As a consequence a politically correct, but scientifically incorrect and indefensible concept, has arisen and is supported and nurtured by the authorities of the western world, especially by the USA and its allies.

At this time the politically correct concept is simply that HIVs originated in Africa by an unusual, unique isolated case of transmission from a simian to humans. This simple concept is contrary to all the facts concerning the nature of HIVs and the origin of their pandemics... To name just a few,

  • Simian Immuno Viruses (SIVs), like other animal SIVs, are essentially harmless passenger viruses which do not cause an AIDS-like disease

  • SIVs are genetically very different from HIV-1

  • HIVs do not cause AIDS in simians including chimpanzees (despite many attempts)

  • no HIV has ever been found in any animal, etc.

At least 5 different simians with 3 different HIV strains at 5 distantly different locations, three in Africa and two in America, all at close to the same time, would have to be involved, etc. These and other such facts result in the simian origin concept being maintained publicly only by those with dependent funding. Authority Betty Korber working at Los Alamos recently communicated publicly about her important genetic work on HIV-1ís time origin. Her communication included a comment about the mystery of HIVís origin. (5).

The origin of HIVs remains a mystery to human science. Meanwhile HIVs continue to do what they do best, infect and kill humans.
 

 


Human purposeful creation of HIVs impossible (4)

Human iatrogenic concepts generally presuppose the HIV multiple pandemics originated in accidental or purposeful contamination of vaccines. Human conspiratorial concepts propose that HIVs are purposefully created Biological Warfare agents. I maintain all concepts that HIV came into existence by human origination are invalid, for five different reasons:

(1). All attempts to reproduce the supposed accident which originated HIV have failed. It is extremely unlikely that an accidental occurrence could have produced HIV from non-HIV, when all such attempts by skilled researchers have not succeeded in doing so.

(2). Human science was quite incapable of creating HIVs in the time frame of HIV-1 origination, now placed between 1930 and 1940. The necessary knowledge of virology simply was not available then, and still is not now.

(3). The history of the HIV pandemics indicates against human involvement. The required vaccination programs did not exist in Africa and America during the required time frame of 1930 - 1940.

(4). There is no record or evidence of any Biological Warfare research program relating to HIV. What government would attempt to produce such a genocidal agent? What government would release it knowing there is no cure?

(5). The evidence from Ufology strongly suggests non-human involvement. The concept of non-human involvement logically and simply explains all the relevant facts from both Biomedicine and Ufology. The concept of human involvement is repeatedly in conflict with the same facts.

 

 

Latrogenic (medical) concept not possible (5)

Iatrogenic concepts rely upon accidental creations for the different HIV strains, and mass needle inoculations for the early initiation of the HIV pandemics. Inoculations by mouth, such as for example via the Sabin oral polio live virus, commonly given orally by sugar cube, are excluded, as HIVs are believed not infectious by consumption of food .

(4). To my knowledge human science has not, despite many attempts, ever succeeded in creating HIVs from non-HIVís

(3). It is very improbable that where many purposeful skilled attempts have failed, an accident many years earlier could have achieved this result. Note that several purposeful linked events would have been necessary. As a minimum it would be necessary for two different strains of HIV-1 and one strain of HIV-2 to accidentally originate at the same time. And for the gay infecting virus to be given to gays by inoculation in America. While the non-gay infecting HIV-1 was given by inoculation to non-gays in central Africa. And the different non-gay infecting HIV-1 virus was given by inoculations to non-gays in western Africa and India. All at close to the same time. That all these events could have occurred accidentally and/or purposefully by human means appears so unlikely, that I consider them essentially impossible.

Therefore I consider the above considerations effectively exclude human iatrogenic theories of HIV origin.

(6).Human conspiratorial concept not possible. Briefly, human purposeful creation of HIVs is not possible because at the time HIVs originated, in the first half of the last century or earlier, human science was quite incapable of creating HIVs, even if it wanted to. The evidence is as follows.

When the human body becomes HIV infected its immune system eventually recognizes the infection and produces detectable antibodies to the HIVs, usually within weeks or months. This is termed seroconversion. Attempts to determine when HIVs originated include the study of frozen dated African and American blood samples to determine the earliest dates for seroconversion. To my knowledge nothing earlier than 1950 has been found. This indicates HIVs and their pandemics originated as early as 1950.

A time for HIV-1 origin can also be arrived at, by comparing the number of existent mutations with the viral mutation rate. In the hands of Wolinsky et al (6) this resulted in a time frame of 1930 to 1950. In the hands of Korber et al this resulted in a time frame of 1920 to 1940 (5).

  • The above indicates conclusively that HIVs originated no more recently than 1950. Most likely in the time frame of 1930 to 1940.

  • I maintain that it was impossible for human science to purposefully create HIVs (and infect people with them) even at the time of 1950, because virology in general and viral genetics in particular was not nearly knowledgeable enough. For example

  • The key research enzyme Reverse Transcriptase, detection of which in the suspected AIDS virus provided the discovery that they were retroviruses, was discovered in 1970

  • Retroviruses in humans were not discovered until 1978

  • The polymerase chain reaction, central to retroviral research, was not discovered until 1983 (7).

Without any knowledge of or use of these tools, purposeful creation of HIVs would be technically impossible. In addition, what human agency would fund the development of such destructive agents? And after development purposefully release them, in the knowledge there was no generally effective prevention or treatment? And why in the time frame of 1930 to 1940? At this time America was still recovering from a great economic depression. These are not the circumstances under which an immensely and generally destructive new viral disease is developed and released.

The above considerations effectively exclude all human conspiratorial theories of HIV origin.

A non-human conspiratorial theory. (7)

The conspiratorial theory can be saved by the concept that HIVs were originated and initially spread into humans by means of purposeful intelligence, that intelligence not being human. This concept is in good agreement with all the known facts, and to my knowledge is the only way they can be logically and simply explained.

Supporting evidence from Ufology. (8)

Before proceeding further I immediately state that all the foregoing, though on the surface convincing regarding a non-human conspiratorial theory, is in fact far from convincing to the experienced scientist. If I had nothing more than the foregoing, I would never have sought publication of my hypothesis. In fact, however, there is a massive and convincing body of supportive evidence, from the independent source of Ufology. It is this evidence from Ufology, which in addition to the evidence from Biomedicine, encouraged me to formulate and publish the hypothesis.

The evidence from Biomedicine and Ufology is complementary and mutually supportive, and the hypothesis which results from combining the two simply and logically explains otherwise incomprehensible phenomena from both disciplines.

For example, the incomprehensible (high technology) origins of HIVs, the essentially simultaneous initiation of the different strains and their pandemics, the missing AIDS cases between 1945 and 1979, all become readily understandable by simply employing the concept that advanced extraterrestrial (ET) technology is involved. The incomprehensible phenomena of cattle mutilations become readily understandable with the understanding that the mutilations in fact occur at locations of HIV transmission in humans, and are in fact probably not mutilations but tissue samplings related to HIV transmission.

 

The (harvested) cattle blood is genetically very similar to human blood(8), and may be taken in relation to HIV replication. The incomprehensible phenomena of human abduction with medical type examinations become understandable with the realization that the examinations emphasize locations of HIV transmission in humans (14)

 


Part 2
 


Evidence From Ufology


The evidence from Ufology comes mostly from the two apparently different, but we shall see evidently related, subjects of Cattle Mutilations and Human Abductions. It is beyond this workís scope to treat either of these subjects in any kind of detail. For more information see the voluminous literature under the heading of Ufology. As many scientists are not familiar with these subjects brief descriptions are in order.
 

 


Cattle Mutilations


Cattle Mutilations and HIVs. (8)

A member of the family Bovidae domesticated Bos Taurus (plural cattle), usually a top grade animal, is in good health one day, and dead the next. It is found that body parts were taken from regions not good to eat, by means of laser-like very sharp cuts. The animalís blood is not present, and there is little or no blood on the animal or ground. There are no tracks of any kind, predators, humans or vehicles, even with very soft ground. Sometimes animals have injuries or are found in conditions consistent with being dropped from a height. Large animals have been found in trees (9). It is not uncommon for UFO sightings to be reported in the general vicinity. These phenomena have been reported throughout the world, and widely investigated in America. There is no doubt that such cattle mutes occur. They are valid widespread phenomena and are also not just extremely isolated, very uncommon events.

The politically correct explanation, in America supplied by the county agent to angry, baffled cattlemen, is animal predators, probably coyotes. In reply one cattleman said, If the coyotes can do this then we are in deep trouble. In addition to animal predators it has been suggested that a cult, or the military, is responsible. The authorities publicly maintain the politically correct animal predator explanation, but due to investigations by their civilian and military assets know otherwise (9).

Animal predators are excluded for several reasons. There is the absence of predator tracks, the absence of animal blood, and the laser-like cuts. The mutilations are of meat not good to eat. The meat good to eat is left to rot. It is reported predators will not eat cattle mutes, nor will rendering facilities accept them (9).

The bizarre nature and circumstances of cattle mutes resulted in the concept that a cult was responsible. However this explanation is easily refuted. No cult is nearly large enough to create these widespread cattle mute phenomena. And even if they could, why would they? Without anyone ever hearing anything from them? No cult has ever claimed responsibility for even one cattle mute.

Although in theory the military is possibly large enough, and could lift cattle into helicopters, mutilate, and then drop them, why would they operate like this-? If desired cattle could be bought openly and mutilated/disposed of in secret.

It has been suggested that cattle at specific locations downwind from nuclear power plants were sampled for radioactivity. However many cattle mutes occur very distant from nuclear plants. And some occur in countries without nuclear energy. The body areas sampled do not include testing for the common isotopes of concern, such as I-131 (thyroid) or Sr-90 (bone).

Therefore the above proposed explanations for cattle mutes all fail. Evidently predators, cults, and the military are not responsible.

The key to understanding cattle mutilation phenomena is found in the fact I discovered that mutilations occur at body sites corresponding to HIV transmission sites in humans (except for the piece of skin and one ear). The genitals, anus, udder part of the mouth/jaw, a piece of skin, one eye, and one ear, usually the left, is commonly taken. Cattle mutes can be readily and logically explained as samplings of body materials from regions corresponding to HIV transmission in humans. Much has been made for example of the ubiquitous incomprehensible anal coring. Of course this body region is an important route of human HIV transmission (4).

I suggest the ear is taken because it contained the necessary locator implant (13). The skin is taken perhaps to study the possibility of HIV transmission via viral shedding from this route.

Possibly the cattle blood is taken because cattle blood is genetically closer to human blood than the blood of any other animal. It might be that cattle blood is harvested in relation to HIV antibodies. We employ large animals for the purpose of antibody production; one example is the use of horses to produce tetanus antitoxin.

The following recent scientific investigation of a cattle mute is informative.

A N. E. Utah pregnant cow mutilation case in good condition was thoroughly investigated by Ph.D. and Ph.D./D.V.M. personnel from the well funded National Institute of Discovery Science (NIDS) headquartered in Las Vegas Nevada USA. NIDS had a complete professional necropsy made with proper samples taken for detailed laboratory analysis. The usual mutilation and blood findings were present; the left ear was missing. At autopsy the heart was found to be the consistency of pudding inside an intact pericardial membrane.

 

In addition to more usual findings there was also a mysterious light blue biocida gel not seen before by any of the investigators. This gel was found on cut body surfaces and at the animalís rear. A similar appearing blue biocidal gel was personally seen many years earlier and reported on in writing by USAF Col. Philip Corso deceased. Evidently its use was to preserve a dead grey ET alien, who Corso saw immersed in it (10).

NIDS photographed and analyzed the blue gel. It contained (volatile) formaldehyde at low concentration and was evidently a biocidal agent. Why was a biocidal agent employed under these circumstances? To protect against surface infection from what? One possibility is that the gel was employed to protect the unborn near term calf against infection through the birth canal. The cowís former pregnancy was confirmed by two independent lab tests. The uterus was intact but empty, the calf was not found; there were no signs whatsoever of predators, or of it. Probably the calf was abducted.

Lab tests of the cow revealed a very abnormally low level of liver vitamin A and copper, and an imbalance in the extracellular sodium/potassium ratio favoring potassium. These results were published well before my studies reporting the same physiologic abnormalities in human abductees, believed related to the implantís anti- vitamin A action. The evidence indicating the same biochemical abnormalities are found in humans as were found in this cattle mute (11), and also that the abnormalities in humans are due to the implant, also suggests such an implant was present in the cow before mutilation

Both common and uncommon cattle pathogens were tested for with negative test results. Although I repeatedly urged NIDS to also determine cattle mute sample HIV test status, and offered to pay for the testing, no such test results were ever reported.

In its final, detailed report NIDS stated the animalís death may not have been due to natural causes (12).

The facts of HIV/AIDS and cattle mutes become logically and simply explainable only by the concept that ET phenomena are involved.
 

 


Human Abductions


Human Abductions and HIVs. (9)

Briefly- a human or small number of humans see little grey ETs with big all black eyes and despite being terrified cannot resist being taken to a secure private location, frequently aboard a disk shaped craft. They are compelled to undress and lie down nude on medical type (cold) metal examining tables, and are then subjected to various medical type examinations and sometimes surgical procedures, all under direction of the hairless small grey beings with very large all black eyes. Although conscious there is generally little or no pain, though there are exceptions to this. First time abductees found suitable are implanted and will become multiple abductees. Young people are preferred- there is a belief among abductees that if you have not been taken by age 30 you will not be.

 

On completion of the procedures information may be obtained by questioning, being shown scenes and their responses noted, etc. Occasionally such abductees are given a guided tour, brief general instructions, shown abnormal appearing children, etc. Then they are usually returned close to where they were abducted from. Memories of the abduction are consciously absent. So called screen memories are generally present to cover over events (12). The experience is usually emotionally traumatic. Despite the absence of conscious memory abductees are generally somewhat emotionally disturbed, without knowing why.

There are objective indicators of such abductions. One is missing time; since conscious memories of the traumatic events are suppressed/screened over, there is no conscious explanation for the missing time, which can amount to hours or even days. Another is the peculiar small scoop shaped scar resulting from implantation. Implants are small solid objects placed into abductees bodies. Whatever the location implants are found on removal to be in contact with nervous cells. Being radio opaque implants show up readily on x-ray, where they are routinely reported as small foreign bodies of unknown origin. Some implants have been removed and then analyzed by advanced methods. The shape and composition is unlike anything ever seen previously (13). Objective evidence is also presented by the physiologic abnormalities such as the non-dietary vitamin A deficiency generally common to abductees, and believed due to the implant (11).

Repression of the traumatic abduction event(s) understandably results in lasting stress which can result in mental/emotional disturbance. Sleep disturbance is common. The abduction events can be recalled under hypnosis. Much of our knowledge concerning abduction events comes from hypnosis of abductees. Successful hypnotherapy very much reduces possible psychological disturbance. A diet rich in carrots has helped combat abduction related vitamin A deficiency usually with hormonal disturbances (11). Surgical removal of implants has resulted in lasting beneficial results (13).

Based on my detailed personal and email interviews with many so called alleged abductees, my examinations of scoop marks, study of abductee physiologic abnormalities, the fact of and nature of removed implants, etc. I believe the abduction phenomena are valid. Then what is going on here?

The medical type examination given abductees is in fact very different from a routine physical. The major organ systems we usually examine for disease are superficially checked, but evidently a careful examination is made of body regions involved in HIV transmission. For example, thorough time consuming uncomfortable anal probing is routinely given to males. Vaginas are also carefully examined.

The eyes and mouth are examined. If nursing a sample of milk is taken. Blood but not urine, sputum, saliva or fecal matter samples are taken. The skin is repeatedly gently scraped (possibly to evaluate for possible HIV transmission). And there is examination for generalized lymphadenopathy (common in AIDS), by lifting both arms or one arm (8, Secret Life) and checking the lymph nodes. Eggs and sperm are taken. Pregnant women have their foetuses taken (note correlation with the reports of abnormal appearing children, and the missing unborn calf).

Based on the above I suggest multiple abductees serve the following purposes.

(1) Provide monitoring concerning HIV infections in the human population (4).

(2) Provide human eggs, sperm and foetuses for study and use (14, 15).

(3) Provide information on human reactions and society (14).

It is not clear to what degree implantation may allow direct/indirect behavioral control.

I have attempted to evaluate the incidence of HIV infection among abductees. As far as I can tell it is abnormally low. Despite over 500 answered inquiries I never met or was told of any living abductee who was HIV positive. This suggests that abduction may indicate against HIV infection.

There is a case documented in writing by a living investigator, and confirmed by phone to me by another, where an abductee tested HIV positive until his implant was removed. After implant removal he tested and continues to test HIV negative. The implant was hollow and secreted a potassium like substance. No further information is available (4 p. 33).

If this abductee had been HIV infected, he would remain so after implant removal. The circumstances indicate the implant caused a positive HIV test without active virus being present. The HIV tests commonly employed clinically detect antibodies to HIV, not the virus. So this personís implant either released such antibodies, or resulted in their production. Such antibodies would in theory be protective against viral infection.

The positive correlation between HIV test result and implant presence in this case indicates a connection between HIV and the implant. Human science does not have implants that can do this. Assuming the implants are ET phenomena, and I believe the overall evidence strongly suggests this, then a connection between HIVs and ETs is shown.
 

 


Conclusion


After reading my book The AIDS-ET Connection which presents essentially the above information in more detail, a number of people told me you havenít proven anything. In a way this is true; the information presented is mostly circumstantial. In fact the strength of the hypothesis lies not so much in the evidence, but in the fact that it simply and logically explains so much. Like the Heliocentric theory of Copernicus, it simply and logically explains otherwise incomprehensible phenomena. By employing the AIDS-ET Connection concept diverse appearing and otherwise incomprehensible phenomena from Biomedicine and Ufology are explained in terms of each other. Everything seems to fit simply, easily and logically. No accessory hypothesis or condition is necessary.

The reaction of the authorities towards my work has been all negative. This suggests there is at least something valid there. For example.

Why is it that well-funded NIDS has not published HIV test status results on any of the cattle mute cases they investigated, despite my repeatedly corresponding with them and urging this, offering to pay the testing cost, etc? And despite their marked interest in my work? (they bought the first copy of my book). I suggest the answer is simple- they are a governmental asset, and like all such their policy is to collect and suppress important UFO related findings.

 

This concept also explains why after being severely personally criticized in its pages by MUFON columnist Richard Hall, who has no scientific training, my resignation from MUFON was accepted by MUFONís former president Walt Andrus Jr., without its ever being offered. It is public knowledge that the present President of MUFON Mr. John Schuessler is a member of NIDSís Board of Directors, and that MUFONís former Director of Abduction Studies John Carpenter recently sold MUFONís confidential abductee information to NIDSís Col. John Alexander CIA for $14,000. Carpenter publicly apologized for doing this, stating he needed the money for his divorce.

I have recently repeatedly applied again to MUFON for permission to submit research material for possible publication, and this has been repeatedly refused by Dwight Connelly MUFONís Editor. I have repeatedly appealed this refusal to Mr. John Schuessler. Evidently he can do nothing. MUFONís Editor Dwight Connelly continues to refuse consideration of my research for possible publication regardless of its subject. MUFON is Americaís largest UFO organization. Its ongoing policy since 1998 of refusing to consider my research for possible publication, along with the policy of Western scientific journals not to publish anything even touching on Ufology, has effectively hindered awareness that the AIDS-ET Connection hypothesis exists. Such policy is the antithesis of the scientific method, which requires open publication with peer review, followed by testing with publication of the test results.

The reaction of the authorities towards my work has evidently been to take it very seriously. Again, this suggests there is at least something valid there.

For several years now I have asked persons working in the cattle mute field to either determine HIV test status of authentic mute cases, or provide me with samples for testing. My hypothesis predicts such cattle mutes will test positive. To date no such test results are available. In the absence of such test results I am attempting to look for objective evidence elsewhere.

The AIDS-ET Connection hypothesis is either essentially wrong or right. If it is wrong little is lost. Many scientists have proposed hypotheses which turned out to be invalid. If this should be the case, I have worked in good faith, and will be happy to stand corrected.

But if it is correct all will be lost, unless steps are taken to avoid that loss. This is the crux of the matter. We plan to be voyaging to other planets, and then to other star systems. We know what will happen should we find an attractive earth-like planet inhabited by intelligent but technologically inferior beings. The same thing will happen to those beings as happened to the natives in Africa, in the new world discovered by Columbus, etc. Their civilization will be destroyed, to make room for colonists. I suggest there is only one form of cosmic wealth, and that is real estate.

 

We have it, the grey ETs evidently want it. We are the only obstacle that stands in the way. They are taking steps to eliminate that obstacle. This is what my hypothesis indicates. To ignore this possibility is completely irresponsible. I ask every responsible human being to consider the possibility that my hypothesis is valid. If it is valid then we must take steps to defend ourselves against HIV/AIDS. And against the originators of HIV.
 

 


What need's to be done?


The HIV/AIDS pandemics threaten the deaths of billions. Combating this scourge should be given the highest priority. It appears to me that in the long term all research efforts towards creating a generally preventive vaccine or treatment will fail. Because we are dealing with purposefully changing Biological Warfare agent situations, not a natural phenomena. Therefore I suggest efforts should be concentrated on preventing infection. Chastity outside marriage, and monogamy within marriage, are highly effective. Educate concerning protection against infection during sexual relations. Making HIV infection reportable is the only way to obtain reliable information on its incidence.

New infections could be very much reduced by socially quarantining infected persons. A possible method of social quarantining would be mandatory HIV testing plus the tattooing of HIV test results visible only under UV viewing.

The present policy of concealing the truth about UFOs is long outdated. It may have been helpful at one time but at present is evidently only harmful. This policy must be changed to one of free open inquiry. Let the word go out from the authorities that Ufology related research subjects will be considered for publication, and even funding. Doing this will result in the truth becoming known either way.

My AIDS-ET Connection hypothesis is presented for what it may be worth. Let us hope that the hypothesis is wrong.

Interested persons can contact me by email drpduke@juno.com backup drpduke@hotmail.com.
 

 


REFERENCES

(1).   Grmek, Mirko The History of AIDS 1990 Princeton University Press.
(2).   Garrett, Laurie The Coming Plague 1994 Penguin books.
(3).   Lever, A. Editor The Molecular Biology of HIV/AIDS 1996 John Wiley.
(4).   Duke, Phillip The AIDS-ET Connection 1999 Cosmos Press.
(5).   Korber, Bette Los Alamos National Lab 2-1-2000 Press Release.
(6).   Wolinsky et al., Limitations of a Molecular Clock... Science June 19, 1998 p.1868.
(7).   Blandford and Cosell. In UFOs and Ufology by Devereaux and Brookesmith p.118.
(8).   Womack, James Texas A& M University Report 1984.
(9).   Marrs Jim. Alien Agenda 1997 Harper Collins.
(10). Corso, Philip The Day After Roswell Simon & Schuster 1997 Pocketbooks 1998.
(11). Duke, Phillip RIAP Bulletin Vol 5, Number 4 Oct.-Dec. 2000.
(12). Kelleher et al., Investigation of the unexplained death of a cow in N.E. Utah Oct. 16, 1998 Final Report NIDS Las Vegas NE June 1999.
(13). Leir, Roger The Aliens and the Scalpel Granite Press 1998. See also HERE

(14). Wilson, Katharina The Alien Jigsaw, Puzzle Publishing 1995.
(15). Jacobs, David Secret Life 1995 and The Threat 1998 Simon and Schuster.