|

by Avro Manhattan
from
Scribd Website
|
“Where your treasure is,
there will your heart be also.”
Matthew 6:21
|
Chapter 1
The Historical
Genesis of the Vatican’s Accumulation of Wealth
-
Historical genesis of
the Vatican’s accumulation of wealth
-
The splitting of
Christianity accelerated by its policy of temporal
riches
-
Christianity
expropriates all rival religions
-
How the Apostolic
tradition of poverty was abandoned.
Jesus, the founder of Christianity, was
the poorest of the poor. Roman Catholicism, which claims to be His
church, is the richest of the rich, the wealthiest institution on
earth. How come, that such an institution, ruling in the name of
this same itinerant preacher, whose want was such that he had not
even a pillow upon which to rest his head, is now so top-heavy with
riches that she can rival - indeed, that she can put to shame - the
combined might of the most redoubtable financial trusts, of the most
potent industrial super-giants, and of the most prosperous global
corporation of the world?
It is a question that has echoed along the somber corridors of
history during almost 2,000 years; a question that has puzzled,
bewildered and angered in turn untold multitudes from the first
centuries to our days.
The startling contradiction of the tremendous riches of the Roman
Catholic Church with the direct teaching of Christ concerning their
unambiguous rejection, is too glaring to be by-passed, tolerated or
ignored by even the most indifferent of believers. In the past,
indeed, some of the most virulent fulminations against such mammonic
accumulation came from individuals whose zeal and religious fervor
were second to none. Their denunciations of the wealth, pomp, luxury
and worldly habits of abbots, bishops, cardinals and popes can still
be heard thundering with unabated clamor at the opening of almost
any page of the chequered annals of western history.
But, while it was to their credit that such men had the honesty to
denounce the very church to which they had dedicated their lives, it
is also to the latter’s discredit that she took no heed of the
voices of anguish and anger of those of her sons who had taken the
teaching of the Gospel to the letter and therefore were eager that
the Roman Catholic system, which claimed to be the true bride of
Christ, be as poor as one she called master. When she did not
silence them, she ignored them or, at the most, considered them
utterances of religious innocents, to be tolerated as long as her
revenue was not made to suffer.
Whenever that happened the Vatican did not hesitate to resort of the
most prompt and drastic coercion to silence anyone capable of
setting in motion forces, within or outside her, likely to divest
her of her wealth.
The employment of suppressive measures went from the purely
spiritual to physical ones; the ecclesiastical and lay machineries
were used according to the degree and seriousness of the threat, and
this to such an extent that in due course they became so integrated
as to operate at all levels, wherever the two partners deemed
themselves imperiled.
The result was that finally the religious exertion of Roman Church
became so intermingled with her monetary interests as to identify
the former with the latter, so that very often one could see a
bishop or a pope fulminate excommunication and anathema against
individuals, guilds, cities, princes and kings, seemingly to
preserve and defend the spiritual prerogatives of the Church, when
in reality they did so exclusively to preserve, defend or expand the
territorial, financial or even commercial benefits of a Church
determined to retain, and indeed to add to, the wealth it already
enjoyed.
This policy was not confined only to
come critical or peculiar period of Catholic history. It became a
permanent characteristic throughout almost two millennia. This
feature, besides causing immense sorrow to the most fervent of her
adherents, became the spring of countless disputes, not only with
the principalities of this world, whom she challenged with her
incessant quest for yet more temporal tributes, but equally with
vast sections of Christendom itself.
The splitting of this giant religious system into three distracted
portions, Roman Catholicism in the West, the Orthodox church in the
Near East, Protestantism in Northern Europe, to a very great extent
became a reality very largely because of the economic interest which
lay hidden behind the high-sounding dissensions between the
simmering rival theological disputations.
Thus, had the Church of Rome remained apostolically poor, it is
doubtful whether the lay potentates would have aligned themselves to
the support of the ecclesiastical rebels, since the greed of the
former for the possible acquisition of the immense wealth controlled
by the Church in Germany, England, and elsewhere would not have
become the decisive trigger which made them side with the
revolutionary new spiritual forces whose objectives were not solely
confined to the curtailment of the spiritual and political might of
Rome, but equally to depriving this religious system of the wealth
which she had accumulated through centuries of uncontrolled
monopoly.
It was the allurement of the immediate potential redistribution of
the Vatican’s riches among the lay potentates which a successful
religious secession would have rendered possible, that became the
principal factor ultimately to persuade them to rally to the side of
Luther and his imitators. The dynastic issue of King Henry VIII of
England was not as basic as the economic motivation which really led
to the final breakaway from Roman authority.
The landed gentry who supported his
policy did so with their eyes well fixed upon the economic benefits
to come. The variegated alignment of the German princes with
Lutheranism was prompted chiefly by the same basic economic
considerations. It was such concrete, although seemingly secondary,
factors which in the long run made the Reformation possible.
Seen in this light, therefore, the Roman Catholic Church's
persistent ignoring of the fundamental command of Christ concerning
the riches of this world caused irremediable harm to the spiritual
interests of Christendom at large; and, even more than that, ignited
revolts, provoked revolutions and promoted destructive wars which
were to scar the western world for hundreds of years, up to our own
days.
That was not always so. The true early Church acted upon, and indeed
practiced, the tenets of Jesus Christ, thus putting the accumulation
of the treasures of heaven before the accumulation of those of the
earth.
But as the Roman Catholic system began to develop, the first tiny
seeds of the temporal amassment of wealth were planted. These were
eventually to grow into the monstrous giant mustard tree which was
to obscure the light of Europe for over a thousand years.
The early Christians, following upon the example of the Apostles and
the first and second generations of Christ’s disciples, upon
conversion obeyed Christ’s commandment to the letter and disposed of
their possessions. These they either sold or gave to the Christian
community, the latter using them for communal benefit, so that all
members would partake of them in equal portion. There was no
personal attachment as yet to riches thus used, either on the part
of the single Christian individual or for any autonomous Christian
nucleus. The ownership, possession and enjoyment of any wealth was
anonymous, impersonal and collective. There was also the help of the
poor, of the slaves, of the sick and of the prisoners.
During the first and second centuries the early Christians, by
acting in this manner, retained the innocence of the apostolic
tradition; and even during the third, although the Church’s wealth
had already become substantial, she managed to act in harmony with
Christ’s injunction about poverty. Christians, however, by now no
longer sold their goods upon being baptized. They had come to
harmonize the possession of worldly good with the teaching of Christ
by conveniently quoting or ignoring sundry passages of the Gospels.
Also, by following the example of the Church, which as a corporate
body had begun to accumulate wealth. Its retention was justified by
her help of the destitute, and also by the fact that the habit had
started by which many, upon their death beds, left estates or money
to her.
It was thus that the apostolic tradition of poverty was eventually
abandoned. There was nothing contradictory, so the argument ran, in
Christians retaining earthly riches so long as these were used in
the “service of religion.” The argument seemed a sound one to the
individuals, particularly since Christianity had “turned
respectable.” The Roman Catholic Church thus gradually became the
custodian of wealth passed on to her by her sons, acting as its
distributor and administrator. Until now there had been no
indication of the shape of things to come.
This was soon visible, however, with the
historical event of the utmost importance. The emperor Constantine,
following concrete political consideration, had decided to align the
growing forces of Christianity on his side. A pious legend has it
that he put upon the Roman standards a cross, with the words “In
this sign conquer!” He won against the rear guard forces of the
pagan world.
Constantine recognized Christianity in
A.D. 313. Thence forward a new phase was initiated. The Church
Triumphant began to vest herself with the raiment of the world. The
state became the protector. With this came not only power, but also
wealth. Accumulation of the latter was no longer regarded solely for
the purpose of helping the poor. It became a visible testimony to
her newly found status; a necessity which went with her prestige and
mounting strength and power.
This was reflected in the multiplying erection of prestigious
cathedrals, the opulence of the vestments of her prelates, the
magnificence of her liturgy. Parallel with these grew unchecked
worldly pride, also mounting greed for earthly riches. The two begot
lack of charity, which turned soon into blatant intolerance.
Pagan temples were either closed, transformed into Christian shrines
or demolished. Their properties were summarily added to the Church’s
patrimony. The wealth of sundry religions was mercilessly
expropriated, their clergy dismissed or persecuted, when not civilly
or even physically obliterated. This transfer of political might
made an easy transition into acquisitional power, the Roman Catholic
Church set out in earnest to promote a policy of swift appropriation
of real estate, of highly remunerative governmental posts, and even
of speculative monetary and commercial enterprises.
Simultaneously with the accelerated
growth of prestige, might and wealth, a new factor appeared on the
scene amidst the ruins of the classic and the new emerging cultures:
the monastic communities. These, the nuclei of which had come to the
fore in original obscurity even when the Church was being
persecuted, now transformed themselves into vast associations of
pious individuals determined to ensure the spiritual riches of
heaven by the abandonment of the riches of the earth. But now,
unlike their predecessors the anonymous hermits who sustained
themselves solely upon locusts and spring water, their imitators
found it increasingly difficult to follow such a strict mode of
life.
The legacies of the pious, the presents
of parcels of expensive lands, estates and goods from newly
converted highly placed pagan individuals, and the thanksgiving of
repentant sinners, all contributed within a few centuries to make
the monastic families in Europe the custodians of earthly riches and
thus the administrators of earthly goods. This Church soon found
herself not only on a par with the political and military potentates
of this world, but equally a competitor with these amassers of
wealth, from her high prelates, consorting with the high officials
of the imperial court, to the monastic communities, springing up
with ever more frequency in the semi-abandoned hamlets of former
Roman colonies.
The early apostolic tradition of poverty became an abstraction; at
most, a text for sermons or pious homilies.
And, while single heroic individuals
preached and observed it, the Church Triumphant, congregating with
the principalities of the earth, not only ignored it; she
shamelessly stultified its injunctions, until, having become
embarrassed by it, she brazenly disregarded it, abandoning both its
theory and, even more, its practice.
Chapter 2
The Origin of the
Church’s Temporal Riches
It was at this stage that another no less spectacular factor,
predestined to have profound repercussions upon the development of
Roman Catholicism during its first millennium, appeared on the
scene. The tradition was established of pilgrimages to places where
the saints had lived, had been martyred and had been buried.
Monasteries, nunneries, churches, all had their own. With the
possession of the relics of the blessed, with promotion of their
legends and accounts of their miracles went not only the spiritual
devotions, but also the monetary offerings of the pilgrims. That
spelled wealth for those localities where the pious voyagers
gathered.
The more popular a shrine or a saint, the more abundant
the collection of silver and gold coins.
The most fabulous was undoubtedly that promoted by the cult of the
Blessed Peter, the Turnkey of Heaven. The cult demanded a journey to
Rome, where Peter’s tomb lay. Peter had been crucified there, it was
asserted with no more plausible data than a pious tradition, for the
Bishops of Rome had no more evidence then than have the pontiffs of
the twentieth century. The latter have attempted to substantiate it
with doubtful archaeological finds.
The process, begun by Pope Pius
XII (1939-58), was completed by Pope Paul VI.
In 1968 Paul declared officially that,
“a few fragments of human bones
found under the Basilica of St. Peter are the authentic mortal
remains of the Apostle”. (1)
How the “identification” had been
carried out, on a site where hundreds of thousands of bodies had
been buried during many centuries, was not plausibly explained, in
view also of the fact that there has never been any definite
historical evidence to prove that Peter was ever in Rome. The Roman
Bishops, however, cultivated the myth with undiminished eagerness.
This they did, not as mere upholders of
a devout legend, but as the skillful promoters of a growing cult
which had concrete and far-reaching objectives, since its
magnification brought them immense authority, and with it money. For
the belief that the tomb of Peter was in the Eternal City induced
thousands of pilgrims, beginning with English and Scottish ones, to
go to pray over the Apostle’s tomb; a source of tremendous revenue.
Today we would call it by the more accurate and prosaic name of
tourism.
The successors of Peter promoted pilgrimages to his “tomb” in Rome
very early, although from the start they showed a special
predilection for the richest and most powerful personages of the
times - that is, for individuals who could give them costly
presents, land and power. To quote only one typical case, Pope Leo
tells us how the Emperor Valentinian III and his family regularly
performed their devotions at the tomb of St. Peter, “such practice
yielding a useful respect for the Apostle’s successors” to whom they
offered costly presents and the tenure of lands. Pope Gregory, on
the other hand (590-604), promised Queen Brunhilda remission of her
sins.
“The most Blessed Peter, Prince of the
Apostles.. will cause thee to appear pure of all stain before the
judge everlasting” (2) as long as she granted him, Gregory, what he
asked of her, that, money, real estates, and investitures which
yielded abundant revenues to the Church: a practice which became a
tradition during the oncoming centuries.
Gregory went even further and sent the nobleman Dynamius a cross
containing “fillings” from St. Peter’s chains, telling him to wear
the cross at his throat,
“which is like as if he were wearing
the chains of St. Peter himself.,” and adding “these chains,
which have lain across and around the neck of the most Blessed
Apostle Peter, shall unloose thee for ever from thy sins”.
The gift, of course, was not a free one.
It cost money and gold. (3)
Not content with this, Gregory began to send out “the keys of St.
Peter, wherein are found the precious filings and which by the same
token also remit sins” - provided the recipients paid in cash or
with costly presents. (4)
Once it became known that the relics of St. Peter, when combined
with the spiritual power of his successors, could remit sins, it was
natural that most of the Christians throughout Christendom longed to
go to the tomb and thus partake of Peter’s and the pope’s spiritual
treasures. The latter invariably involved earthly treasures of
money, silver and gold, or deeds of real estate. And that is how the
pilgrimage to Rome, called the Pardon of St. Peter, was initiated -
curiously enough, mostly by Anglo-Saxons.
In addition to encouraging the belief that Peter’s tomb was in Rome
and that his successors had “filings” from St. Peter’s chains, the
popes encouraged the belief that by coming to the Eternal City the
pilgrims could address the Blessed Peter in person. The Church, far
from discouraging such dishonest humbuggery, gave her approval to
it: witness for example the notable St. Gregory of Tours, who, in
his De Gloria Martyrum, gave a detailed description of the
ceremony that had to be performed in order to speak with the Prince
of Apostles. (5)
The pilgrims had to kneel upon the tomb of St. Peter, the opening to
which was covered by a trap door. Then, raising the door, he had to
insert his head into the hole, after which, still remaining in that
posture, he had to reveal in a loud voice the object of his visit to
the saint. Offerings of money were thrown in. Then veneration and
obeisance were to be offered to St. Peter’s successor, the pope.
The religious and even political results
of this practice upon deeply ignorant nations like the Anglo-Saxons,
and upon the Franks who imitated them, can be easily imagined.
Secular rulers of the highest rank flocked to Rome. At the beginning
of the seventh century, for instance, two Anglo-Saxon princes
renounced their thrones and passed the remainder of their lives at
the tomb of St. Peter. (6)
King Canute himself could not resist
Peter’s appeal. Once in Rome, having paid homage to the pope, he
wrote a letter to the nobles of his kingdom, in which he said:
“I inform you that I come to Rome to
pray for the redemption of my sins.. I have done this because
wise men have taught me that the Apostle St. Peter received of
the Lord great power to bind and to loose, that he is the
turnkey of the kingdom of heaven.. That is why I thought it most
useful to obtain this special patronage before God.” (7)
The well-calculated policy of this cult,
once widely established, yielded increasingly valuable results for
the popes, who were quick to turn the prestige thus gained into a
powerful instrument by which to obtain the submission of men of low
or high rank, both in the spiritual and in the secular fields. The
accumulation of riches, which had not only begun to the a permanent
feature of Roman Catholicism but had started to grow since the times
of Constantine, when that Emperor had issued a law concerning the
acquisition of land by the Church (A.D.321), by now had reached such
a stage that it had become a kind of patrimonium, owned,
controlled and administered by the Bishops of Rome.
The possession of property brought with
it inevitable deterioration and indeed corruption of the clergy and
therefore of the Church herself, since the former, seeing the
latter’s eagerness for the things of this world, followed her
example. The clergy, for instance, began to ask for money in
exchange in exchange for their work or made money out of church
goods.
Thus, under the pontificate of Gregory, clerics accepted valuables
in exchange for burial places.
Gregory forbade the practice, “never permitting that anyone should
have to pay for money for a grave.”
He issued sundry decrees which
prohibited the charging of fees for the induction of clerics into
office, for the investment of a bishop, for the drawing up of
documents, and so on. Upon learning of repeated cases in which the
clergy were accused of selling church vessels, Gregory began a
thorough investigation into the whole question of the Church’s
wealth.
After having been told of how a priest
had sold two silver chalices and two candelabra to a Jew, he issued
a series of ordinances which decreed that each Christian community
should make a correct inventory of all its sacred vessels, land and
property. For the first time the census have precise information of
the wealth of the Church. It showed to a surprised Gregory how his
Church owned landed property in Sicily, Gaul, Spain, the Balkan
lands, the Near East and even many parts of Africa. These properties
included not only lands and farms, but also whole towns.
St. Peter’s Patrimony, as it began to be
called, owned Syracuse and Palermo, besides numerous rich estates
all over Sicily, southern Italy, Apulia, Calabria and even
Gallipoli, although in ruins. The estates in Campania and those of
Naples and the Isle of Capri were all producing large revenues. All
in all, the Roman Church in Gregory’s time owned twenty-three
estates, whose total area comprised 380 square miles, with an
aggregate revenue of over one million dollars a year, a colossal sum
at that period.
Gregory himself lived a life of austerity. He was a strong believer
in the “ancient rule of the Fathers”’ that is, in evangelical
poverty. When confronted by all this wealth, he called himself “the
poor man’s treasurer,” and tried to live up to the role. He was the
first pope to call himself Servus Servorum Dei, Servant of
the Servants of God.
Yet, while in agreement with the fathers of the early church, such
as Origen, Tertullian and Cyprian, that material possessions were
not a good thing, the fact remained that Gregory was ruling a
religious system which owned vast properties, real estates and
riches of all kinds. Gregory justified their retention on the ground
that they should be used, as the early Christians had used them, to
help the destitute. That he genuinely believed this was proved by
the fact that once, having heard how a beggar had died of starvation
in Rome, he became so distressed that he shut himself in a cell for
three days and nights without food or drink, refusing even to say
Mass. He tried to administer the riches with wisdom, by giving to
the poor as much as he received.
But the tide of corruption and of the progressive amassment of
worldly wealth continued unabated. Indeed, it gathered momentum,
notwithstanding Gregory’s uncompromising efforts to stem it by every
means at his disposal, such as his demands for precise details of
how the money had been spent, the scrutiny of bookkeeping and his
stern prohibition of “hidden balances of the Greek sort.” It came to
pass then that, only 300 years after Constantine, Roman Catholicism
had already turned herself into one of the largest land owners of
the West.
The Patrimony of St. Peter had become,
not a modest sum of liquid money to be “distributed to the
destitute,” but the accumulated wealth of a rich religious system
determined to become even richer in the years ahead.
While there
were still individuals within the Church who believed in poverty,
wealth continued to accumulate, and this to such an extent that at
one stage she (or rather some of her leaders) had the audacity to
make the Blessed Peter himself “write a letter from heaven.” Before
relating how the Blessed Peter wrote such a celestial missive, it
might be useful to cast a glance at the events which preceded, and
in fact prompted, the deed.
After Pope Gregory’s death, the process of adding more riches to the
already vast accumulation went on unabated for another hundred years
or so. Then, to the horror of the popes, the tide suddenly turned.
In the eighth century, when the papacy had so much that it did not
even know how much, the semi-converted Slavs started to despoil St.
Peter’s Patrimony.
This had been bad enough. But then, even
worse, robbers appeared on the horizon. They sprang from distant
Arabia. And the Arabs, to make things worse, also started to despoil
St. Peter’s Patrimony, claiming that they were doing it in the name
of God. They called him Allah.
In addition, they had the bad habit
of pinpricking the pope’s subjects with their scimitars, telling
them, while taking away all their possessions (or rather the
possessions of their papal master) that in addition to having
changed landlords they had better change also their religion - which
the vast majority promptly did.
In this manner, whole papal dominions were lost. These included
Dalmatia, Istria, Spain, the South of France, and the whole of North
Africa. To all this, Providence, or rather human greed, added insult
to injury when the successors of Constantine, the most Christian
emperor of Constantinople, followed suit and deprived Peter’s
Patrimony of its vast estates in Sicily, Sardinia, Calabria and
Corsica. Within a few decades, St. Peter had been robbed of such
immense estates that his former boundless dominion was eventually
reduced to central Italy, not far away, relatively speaking, from
Rome.
Notwithstanding such a shrinking of
their possessions, the worst devils of all, the Lombards of North
Italy, set out to rob the Blessed Peter of this last estate as well.
This they were about to do when the pope invoked the help of none
other than the Prince of the Apostles, the Blessed Peter himself. He
asked him to mobilize the most powerful potentate of the times,
Pepin, King of the Franks.
Pepin, said the pope, must preserve
intact the Church’s earthly possessions. Indeed, it might even be of
spiritual benefit to him to add some of his own to them.
The Blessed Peter complied! How?
Simply by writing a letter. Direct
from Heaven (sic). To Pepin.
The celestial letter, of course, was first
sent to the pope, Stephen, who had plenty of Peter’s chains’
“fillings”. Stephen sent it to the king by special papal envoy.
The letter, on the finest vellum, was all written in pure gold.
It
read as follows:
Peter, elected Apostle by Jesus
Christ, Son of the Living God. I, Peter, summoned to
the apostolate by Christ, Son of the Living God, has
received from the Divine Might the mission of enlightening the
whole world...
Pepin knelt reverently before the Papal
Legate, who went on reading the Blessed Peter’s missive:
Wherefore, all those who, having
heard my preaching, put it into practice, must believe
absolutely that by God’s order their sins are cleansed in
this world and they shall enter stainless into everlasting life
Come ye to the aid of the Roman people, which has been entrusted
to me by God. And I, on the day of Judgment, shall prepare for
you a splendid dwelling place in the Kingdom of God.
Signed,
Peter, Prince of the Apostles. (8)
The Papal Envoy showed the letter to the
whole court and solemnly vouched for the authenticity of Peter’s
signature. Not only that. St. Peter had gone to the length of
writing the letter with his very own hand. Something he had never
done before.. Or since!
How had the letter ever reached the earth? asked Pepin. The Blessed
Peter in person had come down from Heaven and given the letter to
his successor, the pope of Rome, explained the Papal Envoy.
Thereupon he showed the king how St. Peter had addressed the
celestial letter:
Peter, elected Apostle by Jesus
Christ, to our favorite Son, the King Pepin, to his whole army,
to all the bishops, abbesses, monks, and to the whole people.
(9)
Pepin, King of the Franks, had no
alternative. How could he ever refuse the urgent request of the
Prince of the Apostles? The turnkey of Heaven?
The devout Fleury, in his famous Historia Ecclesiastica, book 43,
17, cannot contain his indignation at the Blessed Peter’s celestial
letter, which he bluntly declared to have been nothing else than “an
unexampled artifice.” Artifice or not, whether written by Stephen
himself or by some of his advisors, the fact remained that the
letter of the Blessed Peter had the desired effect.
In the year of
our Lord 754, Pepin the Short, King of the Franks, defeated the
rapacious Lombards.
Since they had originally wished to rob
the lands of Peter, Pepin, besides donating to Stephen what he had
just preserved and recovered added to it the Duchy of Rome, the
Exarchate and the Pentapolis. All of these added up to a
considerable amount of territory encompassing thousands of villages,
forts, cities, farms, and estates - henceforward to be owned by the
representative of St. Peter on earth, the pope. The success of the
heavenly missive spurred its authors to new efforts.
Soon afterwards, in fact, the Roman
chancery produced the throne of the Blessed St. Peter as well - the
very chair in which St. Peter sat when in Rome, it was asserted; a
further inducement to Pepin and his successors to grant the popes
their protection, and additional property, if need be. The
inducement was a powerful one, since a king of the Franks, if
crowned sitting on the Chair of the Turnkey of Heaven, would be
invested with an authority surpassing that of any other temporal
ruler, with the exception of the pope.
Pepin, it seems, never heard of Peter’s
chair, or had not the time, or - what is most probable - died before
the scheme was put into full working operation. The chair was never
used for its original purpose in his lifetime. His son, the Emperor
Charlemagne, when crowned Emperor in the year 800, did not sit in it
either. The throne, however, eventually came into its own.
And this so much so that by the
following century - during the rule of Charles the Bald (A.D. 875) -
it had become one of the most precious relics of Roman Catholicism.
Since then it has been venerated as the true chair upon which Peter
used to sit, the sacred relic of the Petrine cult for centuries. In
1656 it was put inside an ornate bronze case, on papal command, by
the sculptor Bernini.
Some years ago, however, its authenticity was questioned by certain
Catholic authorities. Having been put under intense study by a
commission of scholars and scientists, following strict carbon 14
and other radiological tests, it was discovered that the chair
belonged approximately to the time of Charles the Bald - i.e. around
A.D. 875 - and not to the first century A.D.
Pope Paul VI was thus, in the winter of 1969-70, put into another
serious quandary.
What could he do with Peter’s throne after a
thousand years of veneration? Put it back where it had been during a
long millennium, in St Peter’s Basilica, or put it in the Vatican
Museum? (10)
But that was the personal problem of a pope of the
twentieth century. Those of the eighth had been concerned only with
magnifying the cult of the Blessed Peter, so as to enhance their
power, no less than the earthly patrimony of the Church.
And so it came to pass that, thanks mostly to the cult of the
Blessed Peter, Roman Catholicism, which had collected such vast
amounts of temporal wealth prior to Pepin, now crowned her earthly
possessions with additional territorial dominions. These, which had
originally formed the first nucleus of the papal possessions,
theoretically were given legal status by Pepin in A.D. 754. They
became a concrete and accepted reality in 756.
In 774
the Donation
was confirmed by Pepin’s immediate successor, Charlemagne. The Papal
States had truly come into existence.
Here the popes reigned as absolute
temporal rulers for more than a thousand years, until 1870, when the
Italians, having seized Rome with all the adjacent papal
territories, declared the Eternal City the capital of the newly
formed united Kingdom of Italy.
Chapter 3
The Church as the
Inheritor of the Former Roman Empire
The establishment of the Papal States provided the Roman Catholic
Church with a territorial and juridical base of paramount
importance. From then on it enables her to launch upon the promotion
of an ever bolder policy directed at the accelerated acquisition of
additional lands, additional gold, and the additional status,
prestige and power that went with them.
The Emperor Charlemagne had not, in fact, turned his back on Rome
after recognizing Pepin’s Donation, but Pope Hadrian I in A.D. 774
presented him with a copy of the Donation of Constantine. This was
reputed to be the grant by Constantine of immense possessions and
vast territories to the Church. It was another papal forgery.
Whereas the letter from Peter had been a forgery by Pope Stephen,
the Donation of Constantine was one by Pope Hadrian I.(1)
The Donation of Constantine had tremendous influence upon the
territorial acquisition and claims of the papacy, and a cursory
glance at its origins, contents, and meaning will help to elucidate
its importance.
The Donation was preceded and followed by various papally forged
documents on the level of the Blessed Peter’s missive. Like the
latter, their specific objective was to give power, territory and
wealth to the popes. Thus, soon after Pepin’s death, for instance, a
document appeared on the scene which was a detailed narrative put
into the mouth of the dead Pepin himself.
In it Pepin related, in
somewhat extravagant Latin, what had passed between himself and the
pope, “the successor of the Turnkey of Heaven, the Blessed Peter”.
His disclosure was meant as proof that he had donated to the pope,
not only Rome and the Papal States already mentioned, but also
Istria, Venetia and indeed the whole of Italy. (2)
Not content with the Papal States and the new regions acquired, the
popes now wanted even more, thus proving the accuracy of the old
saying that the appetite increases with the eating. They set
themselves to expand even further their ownership of additional
territories. They concluded that the newly born Papal States,
although of such considerable size, were too small for the pope, the
representatives of the Blessed Peter. These territories had to be
extended to match Peter’s spiritual imperium. Something
incontrovertible by which the popes would be unequivocally granted
the ownership of whole kingdoms and empires had, therefore, become a
necessity.
At this point this most spectacular of all forgeries makes its
official appearance: the Donation of Constantine.
Purporting to have
been written by the Emperor Constantine himself, it emerged from
nowhere. The document with one master stroke put the popes above
kings, emperors and nations, made them the legal heirs to the
territory of the Roman Empire, which it granted to them, lock stock,
and barrel, and gave to St. Peter - or rather to St. Silvester and
his successors - all lands to the West and beyond, indeed, all lands
of the planet.
The document was a sum of the previous forgeries, but unlike past
fabrications it was definite, precise and spoke in no uncertain
terms of the spiritual and political supremacy which the popes had
been granted as their inalienable right. The significance and
consequences of its appearance were portentous for the whole western
world.
The social structure and political framework of the Middle
Ages were molded and shaped by its contents. With it the papacy,
having made its boldest attempt at world dominion, succeeded in
placing itself above the civil authorities of Europe, claiming to be
the real possessor of lands ruled by Western potentates, and the
supreme arbiter of the political life of all Christendom.
In view of the profound repercussions of this famous forgery, the
most spectacular in the annals of Christianity, it might be useful
to glance at its main clauses:
-
Constantine desires to
promote the Chair of Peter over the Empire and its seat on
earth by bestowing on it imperial power and honor.
-
The Chair of Peter shall have
supreme authority over all churches in the world.
-
It shall be judge in all that
concerns the service of God and the Christian faith.
-
Instead of the diadem which the
Emperor wished to place on the pope’s head, but which the
pope refused, Constantine had given to him and to this
successors the phrygium - that is, the tirara and the
lorum
which adorned the emperor’s neck, as well as the other
gorgeous robes and insignia of the imperial dignity.
-
The Roman clergy shall enjoy the
high privileges of the Imperial Senate, being eligible to
the dignity of patrician and having the right to wear
decorations worn by the nobles under the Empire.
-
The offices of cubicularii,
ostiarii, and excubitae shall belong to the Roman Church.
-
The Roman clergy shall ride on
horses decked with white coverlets, and, like the Senate,
wear white sandals.
-
If a member of the Senate shall
wish to take orders, and the pope consents, no one shall
hinder him.
-
Constantine gives up the
remaining sovereignty over Rome, the provinces, cities and
towns of the whole of Italy or of the Western Regions, to
Pope Silvester and his successors.
-
With the first clause the pope became
legally the successor of Constantine: that is, the heir to the Roman
Empire.
-
With the second he was made the absolute head of al
Christendom, East and West, and indeed of all the churches of the
world.
-
With the third he was made the only judge with regard to
Christian beliefs. Thus anyone or any church disagreeing
with him became heretic, with all the dire spiritual and temporal
results of this.
-
With the fourth the pope surrounded himself with
the splendor and the insignia of the imperial office, as the
external representation of his imperial status.
-
With the fifth the
whole Roman clergy was placed on the same level as the senators,
patricians and nobles of the Empire. By virtue of this clause, the
Roman clergy became entitled to the highest title of honor which the
emperors granted to certain preeminent members of the civil and
military aristocracy, the ranks of patrician and consul being at
that time the highest at which human ambition could aim.
-
The sixth and seventh clauses, seemingly
irrelevant, were very important. For the popes, by claiming to be
attended by gentlemen of the bedchamber, doorkeepers and bodyguards
(cubiculari, ostiarli, etc.) emphasized their parity with the
Emperors, as preciously only the latter had this right. The same
applies to the claim that Roman clergy should have the privilege of
decking their horses with white coverings, which in the eighth
century was a privilege of extraordinary importance.
-
The eighth
clause simply put the Senate at the mercy of the pope.
-
Finally the ninth, the most important
and the one with the greatest consequences in Western history, made
the pope the territorial sovereign of Rome, Italy and the Western
Regions; that is to say, of Constantine’s Empire, which comprised
France, Spain, Britain and indeed the whole territory of Europe and
beyond.
By virtue of
the Donation of Constantine, therefore,
the
Roman Empire became a fief of the papacy, while the Emperors turned
into vassals and the popes into suzerains.
Their age old dream, the Roman dominion,
became a reality, but a reality in which it was no longer the Vicars
of Christ what were subject to the Emperors, but the Emperors who
were subject to the Vicars of Christ. The early concrete result of
the Donation thus was to give a legal basis to the territorial
acquisitions of the popes, granted them by Pepin and Charlemagne.
Whereas Pepin and Charlemagne had
established them sovereigns de facto, the Donation of Constantine
made them sovereigns de jure - a very important distinction and of
paramount importance in the claim for future possessions. It is very
significant that it was after the appearance of the Donation under
Pope Hadrian (c774) that the papal chancery ceased to date documents
and letters by the regnal years of the Emperors of Constantinople,
substituting those of Hadrian’s pontificate.
Although there are no proofs that the document was fabricated by the
pope himself, yet it is beyond dispute that the style of the
Donation is that of the papal chancery in the middle of the eight
century.
The fact, moreover, that the document first appeared at the
Abbey of St. Denis, where Pope Stephen spent the winter of 754, is
additional proof that the pope was personally implicated in its
fabrication. Indeed, although here again there is no direct
evidence, it is supposed that the Donation was forged as early as
753 and was brought by Pope Stephen II to the Court of Pepin in 754,
in order to persuade that monarch to endow the popes with their
first territorial possessions. Once the Papal States came into
being, the document was concealed until it was thought that it could
be used with his son, Charlemange, who had succeeded his father.
(3)
The first spectacular materialization of the Donation was seen not
many years after its first appearance, when Charlemagne, the most
potent monarch of the Middle Ages, granted additional territories to
the Papal States and went to Rome to be solemnly crowned in St.
Peter’s by Pope Leo, as the first Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire,
in the year 800.
The great papal dreams of (a) the recognition of
the spiritual supremacy of the popes over emperors and (b) the
resurrection of the Roman Empire, at long last had come true.
The subjugation of the Imperial Crown was not, however enough. If it
was true that this put the source of all civil authority - that is
to say, the emperor - under the pope, it was also true that the
distant provinces could not or would not follow the imperial
example. The best way to make them obey was by controlling the civil
administration in the provinces, as had been done at its center with
the emperor. As the pope had made a vassals of the civil authorities
in the dioceses. By so doing the pope, with a blindly obedient,
hierarchical machinery, would control at will the civil
administration of the whole empire.
It was to put such a scheme into effect that yet another forgery,
complementary to the Donation, appeared little more than half a
century later, again from nowhere. In 850 the pseudo-Isidorean
Decretals, better known as the as the “False Decretals,” made their
first official appearance. They are a heterogeneous collection of
the early decrees of the councils and popes.
Their seeming purpose was to give a
legal basis to the complaints of the clergy in the empire, appealing
to Rome against the misdeeds of high prelates or of the civil
authorities. Although some of the contents of the Decretals are
genuine, a colossal proportion was garbled, forged, distorted or
entirely fabricated. This was in order to achieve their real aim: to
obtain additional power for the popes by giving to the abbots,
bishops, and clergy in general authority over civil jurisdiction in
all the provinces, thus establishing a legal basis for evading the
orders of the provincial secular rulers.
The result was that the Roman Church obtained important privileges,
among them immunity from the operation of the secular law, which put
her out of reach of the jurisdiction of all secular tribunals. In
this fashion the clergy acquired not only a peculiar sanctity which
put them above the ordinary people, but a personal inviolability
which gave them an enormous advantage in all their dealings or
disputes with the civil power.
Thus, thanks to a series of fabrications, forgeries, and
distortions, carried out through several centuries and of which the
Donation of Constantine was the most spectacular, the popes not only
obtained a vantage ground of incalculable value from which to extend
their spiritual and temporal power, but rendered themselves
practically independent of all secular authority.
Even more, they saw to it that the
statutes of emperors and kings, no less than the civil law of
nations, be undermined, greatly weakened and indeed obliterated by
their newly acquired omnipotence.
Chapter 4
The Church Claims
Ownership of the Western World
Once rooted in tradition and strengthened by the credulity of the
times, the dubious seedling of
the Donation grew into a mighty oak
tree under the shadow of which papal authoritarianism thrived.
From
the birth of the Carolingian Empire in the year 800 onwards,
...were assiduously used by the pontiffs to consolidate their power.
This they did, until , with additional forgeries and the arbitrary
exercise of spiritual and temporal might, these documents became the
formidable foundation stone upon which they were eventually to erect
their political and territorial claims, the rock upon which stood
the whole papal structures of the Middle Ages.
The Donation was given increasingly varied meanings by the
succeeding generations of theologians. Notwithstanding the disparity
in their views, however, they all agreed upon one fundamental
interpretation: the Donation gave the widest possible power and
authority to the papacy.
Thus, for instance, whereas Pope Hadrian
I stated that Constantine had “given the dominion in these regions
of the West” to the Church of Rome, Aeneas, Bishop of Paris,
asserted about the year 868 that as Constantine had declared that
two emperors, the one of the realm, the other of the Church, could
not rule in one city, he had removed his residence to
Constantinople, placing the Roman territory “and a vast number of
various provinces” under the rule of the Apostolic See, after
conferring regal power on the successors of St. Peter.
The Popes acted upon this, using the argument as a basis to increase
their territorial sway, with the inevitable new accumulation of
wealth which went with it. Gregory VII (1073) directed all his
energies to that effect. He concentrated spiritual and political
jurisdiction in himself, the better to administer the Western Empire
as a fief of the papacy.
That implied the extension of his
temporal dominion over the kings and kingdoms of the earth and
therefore over their temporal riches. Indeed, Gregory had no qualms
in openly asserting temporal supremacy over the whole of the
Byzantine Empire, including Africa and Asia. He went even further by
declaring that his ultimate goal was simply the establishment of the
universal temporal domain of St. Peter. Hence his continual
exertions to take possession of, in addition to Rome and Italy, all
the crowns of Europe, many of which he succeeded in placing under
his direct vassalage.
Although his vast scheme only partially materialized during his
reign, his successors continued his work. Pope Urban II, following
in his footsteps, decided to bring under subjection the churches of
Jerusalem, of Antioch, of Alexandria and of Constantinople, with all
the lands wherein they flourished. Under the pretext of liberating
the tomb of Christ, he simply mobilized the entire western world
into an irresistible army which, leaving the shores of Europe,
plunged into Asia Minor like a tornado, creating the greatest
military, political and economic commotion in both continents.
The capture of Jerusalem and the success
of the First Crusade gave incalculable prestige to the pontiffs.
While the nations of Europe attributed this victory to manifest
supernatural power, the Roman Pontiffs were quick to transform the
great martial movements of the Crusades into powerful instruments to
be used to expand their spiritual and temporal dominion. This was
done by employing them as military and political levers which never
ceased to yield territorial and financial advantages throughout the
Middle Ages.
Such policies went a step further when, basing papal claims on an
even more daring interpretation of the Donation, it was stated that
the secular rulers should be made to pay tribute to the papacy. A
vehement advocate of this was Otto of Freisingen, who in his
Chronicles composed in 1143-6, did not hesitate to declare that as
Constantine, after conferring the imperial insignia on the pontiff,
went to Byzantium to leave the empire to St. Peter, so other kings
and emperors should pay tribute to the popes.
For this reason the Roman Church maintains that the Western kingdom
have been given over to her possession by Constantine, and demands
tribute from them to this day, with the exception of the two
kingdoms of the Franks (i.e. the French and German).
Such advocacy was made possible because only a century earlier, in
1054, Pope Leo IX had declared to the Patriarch Michael Cerularius
that the Donation of Constantine really meant the donation “of
earthly and heavenly imperium to the royal priesthood of the Roman
chair.” From all this it followed that soon Lombardy, Italy, and
Germany began to be reckoned, in the eyes of Rome, as “papal fiefs,”
the popes declaring ever more boldly that the German kings had
possessed the Roman Empire, as well as the Italian Kingdom, solely
as a present from the pontiffs.
Such claims, of course, did not go
unchallenged, and they often caused the profoundest political
commotion - for instance, the one that broke out in Germany in 1157,
when a letter from Pope Hadrian to Frederick Barbarossa spoke of
“beneficia” which he had granted to the Emperor, or could still
grant, and expressly called the imperial crown itself such a beneficium - i.e. a
feud, as it was understood at the imperial
court. Hadrian said, on the strength of the fact that it was he who
had placed the crown on the Emperor’s head, that the pope was the
real owner of Germany.
It was not only the princes who rebelled against the papal
pretensions. Men otherwise devoted to this religious system spoke in
no uncertain words against papal infringement upon civil power.
Provost Gerhoh of Reigersburg, for instance, commenting upon the
custom (which, of course, rested for support on
the Donation of
Constantine) of the emperor were represented as vassals of the
popes, concluded that this besides causing the embittered feelings
of temporal rulers, went also against the divine order by allowing
the popes to claim to be emperors and lords of emperors.
A few years later Gottfried, a German
educated in Bamburg, chaplain and secretary to the three
Hohenstaufen sovereigns, Conrad, Frederick, and Henry IV, building
on what Aeneas, Bishop of Paris, had already said, went a step
further than Pope Adrian and included France in the Donation. In his
Pantheon, which he dedicated to Pope Urban III in 1186, he stated
that in order to secure greater peace for the Church, Constantine,
having withdrawn with all his pomp to Byzantium, besides granting to
the popes regal privileges, had given dominion over Rome, Italy and
Gaul, with all the riches therein.
With passing of the centuries, the
popes, instead of abating their claims, continued to increase them
by declaring that, by virtue of the Donation, emperors were emperors
simply because they permitted them to be so the sole ruler in
spiritual and temporal matters being, in reality, the pontiff
himself. Such pretensions were not left to wither in the theoretical
field. They were directed to concrete territorial, political, and
financial goals which the pontiffs pursued with indefatigable
pertinacity.
Pope Innocent II (1198-1216), the most
energetic champion of papal supremacy, thundered incessantly to all
Europe that he claimed temporal supremacy over all the crowns of
Christendom: for, as the successor of St. Peter, he was
simultaneously the supreme head of the true religion and the
temporal sovereign of the universe. His tireless exertions saw to it
that papal rulership was extended over sundry lands and kingdoms.
By
the end of his reign, in fact, the Vatican had become the temporal
ruler of Naples, of the islands of Sicily and Sardinia, of almost
all the States of the Iberian peninsula such as Castile, Leon,
Navarre, Aragon and Portugal, of all the Scandinavian lands, of the
Kingdom of Hungary, of the Slav State of Bohemia, of Servia, Bosnia,
Bulgeria, and Poland. A proud list!
He became also the true de facto and de
jure sovereign of England, after having compelled John to make
complete submission. During the last years of that king’s reign and
the first few of Henry III, Innocent governed the island effectively
through his legates. That was not enough, however, for Innocent
proclaimed himself the temporal ruler of the Christian states
founded in Syria by the Crusaders. Indeed, he went even further.
Taking advantage of the Franco-Venetian
Crusade of 1202, he planned the annexation of the Byzantine Empire.
A Latin Empire came into being in the East, and while the Byzantine
became the temporal vassals of the pope, the Greek Orthodox Church
was compelled to acknowledge Roman supremacy. Later on, such immense
dominion was extended by his successors through the conversion to
Roman Catholicism of the pagans of the Baltic.
At this time, as in the past, one
country more than any other opposed the irresistible ecclesiastical
absorption: the powerful German Empire. But the pope, in spite of
many setbacks, never recognized Germany as being outside this
formidable papal imperium, on the familiar ground that she was an
integral part of the patrimony of St. Peter.
Not content with the Donation of Constantine, Innocent IV asserted
that when Constantine gave to the Church had not belonged to him at
all, for Europe has always belonged to the Church.
In an encyclical
published shortly after the close of the Council of Lyons in 1245,
Innocent expressly stated:
“It is wrong to show ignorance of
the origin of things and to imagine that the Apostolic See’s
rule over secular matters dates only from Constantine. Before
him this power was already in the Holy See. Constantine merely
resigned into the hands of the Church a power which he used
without right when he was outside her pale. Once admitted into
the Church, he obtained, by the concession of the vicar of
Christ, authority which only then became legitimate. “
After which, in the same encyclical,
Innocent fondly dwelt upon the idea that the pope’s acceptance of
the Constantine Donation was but a visible sign of his sovereign
dominion over the whole word, and hence of all the wealth to be
found on earth.
Belief in the Donation and in the wide extent of territory which
Constantine included in it grew ever stronger. Gratian himself did
not include it, but it was soon inserted a palea, and thus found an
entry into all schools of canonical jurisprudence, so that from this
time on the lawyers were the most influential publishers and
defenders of the fiction. The language of the popes also was
henceforward more confident.
“Omne regnum Occidentis ei (Silvestro) tradidit we dimisit,” said
Innocent II (1198-1216) Gregory IX (1227-41) followed this out to
its consequences, in a way surpassing anything that had been done
before when he represented to the Emperor Frederick II that
Constantine the duchy and the imperium to the care of the popes
forever.
Whereupon the popes, without diminishing
in any degree whatever the substance of their jurisdiction,
established the tribunal of the empire, transferred it to the
Germans, and were wont to concede the power of the sword to the
emperors at their coronation. By now, this was as much as to say
that this imperial authority had its sole origin in the popes, could
be enlarged or narrowed at their good pleasure, and that the pope
could call each emperor to account for the use of the power and the
riches entrusted to him.
But the highest rung of the ladder was as yet not reached. It was
first achieved by Gregory’s successor, Innocent IV, when the synod
of Lyons resulted in the deposition of Frederick, in which act this
pope went beyond all his predecessors in the increase of his claim
and the extent of the authority of Rome. The Dominican, Tolomeo of
Lucca, author of the two last books of the work De Regimine
Principum, the first two books of which were by Thomas Aquinas, went
even further and explained the Donation as a formal abdication of
Constantine in favor of Sylvester.
Connection with this other historical
circumstances, which were either inventions or misconceptions, he
thence drew the conclusion that the power and wealth of all temporal
princes derived its strength and efficacy solely from the spiritual
power of the popes. There was no halting half way, and immediately
afterwards, in the contest of Boniface VIII with Philip of France,
the Audutinian monk Aegidius Colonna of Rome, whom the pope had
nominated to the archbishopric of Bourges, drew the natural
conclusion without the slightest disguise in a work which he
dedicated to his patron.
The other theologians of the papal court, Agostino Trionfo and
Alvaro Pelayo, surpassed all previous claims and declared, that if
an emperor like Constantine had given temporal possession to
Sylvester, this was merely a restitution or what had been stolen in
an unjust and tyrannical way. (1)
Emperors and kings were compelled very
often, not only to acknowledge such claims as true, but to swear
that they would defend them with their swords; to cite only one
before his coronation. Pope Clement V made this monarch swear that
he would protect and uphold all the rights which the emperors,
beginning with Constantine, had granted to the Roman Church -
without, however, stating what these rights were. (2)
The power given by the Donation to the Roman Church was further
enhanced by that inherent in the papacy itself. As the direct
successors of Peter, the popes were the only true inheritors of the
might of the Church, and hence of whatever and whoever were under
her authority.
The theory ran as follows:
‘Christ is the Lord of the whole
world. At his departure he left his dominion to his
representatives, Peter and his successors. Therefore the
fullness of all spiritual and temporal power and dominion, the
union of all rights and privileges, lies in the hands of the
pope. Every monarch, even the most powerful, possesses only so
much power and territory as the pope has transferred to him or
finds good to allow him.’
This theory was supported by most
medieval theologians. (3)
It became the firm belief of the popes
themselves. In 1245, for instance, Pope Innocent IV expounded this
doctrine to none other than the Emperor Frederick, saying that, as
it was Christ who had entrusted to Peter and his successors both
kingdoms, the heavenly and the earthly, belonged to him, the pope:
by which he meant that the spiritual dominion of the papacy had to
have its counterpart also in papal dominion over all the lands,
territories and riches of the entire world.
Not even the most ambitious emperors of the Ancient Roman Empire had
ever dared to claim as much.
Chapter 5
The Church Claims Ownership
of all Isles and Lands as yet Undiscovered
Following claims with
deeds, the popes set about implementing their new, astounding theory
by word, diplomacy, cunning, threats, and ruthless action.
While appealing for support, armed with
all the mystic and spiritual authority of the Church, they went on
stating, asserting, and declaring that their rights were based upon
the utmost legality, by virtue of the Donation of Constantine. It
was, in fact, a clause in the fabulous Donation (or rather a couple
of sentences as interpreted by them) which,. although seeming at
first sight insignificant, had the most tragic and far-reaching
consequences.
The words, in the last clause of the
Donation:
“Constantine gives up the remaining
sovereignty over Rome.. “ and ending: “.. or of the western
regions to Pope Sylvester and is successors” became the
foundation stones upon which the papacy demanded sovereignty,
not only over practically the whole of Europe, but over all the
islands of the oceans.
As in the case of their claims for
Europe, those for the islands grew with the passing of the years and
the increase of fashion and with a comparatively small matter. When
the popes proclaimed their sovereignty over Naples they included the
various small islands nearby, on the ground that they were
possessions of the Church. Later on, as documented in the chronicles
of the Church of St. Maria del Principio, the popes, after having
declared that Constantine gave to St. Peter also all the lands in
the sea, said that the papal sovereignty covered the island of
Sicily as well.
The use of
the forged Donation initiated
a new and more definite phase, however, when Pope Urban II claimed
possession of Corsica in 1091, deducing Constantine’s right to give
away the island from the strange principle that all islands were
legally juris publici, and therefore State domain. When the
popes, after having abstained for one hundred and eighty nine years
from ruling Corsica directly, became strong political potentates
themselves, they had no hesitation in asking for “their island”
back.
In 1077 Pope Gregory VII simply declared that the Corsicans
were “ready to return under the supremacy of the Papacy.”
On this notion that it was the islands especially that Constantine
had given to the popes they proceeded to build, although nothing had
been said in the original document; and with a bold leap the
Donation of Constantine was transferred from Corsica to the far
west, that is, to Ireland, with the result that soon the papal chair
claimed possession of an island which the Romans themselves had
never possessed.
From then onwards, by virtue of the
Donation of Constantine, the popes loudly claimed to be the feudal
lords of all the islands of the ocean, and started to dispose of
them according to their will.
Laboring to obtain papal supremacy, they
used these rights as a powerful political bargaining power by which
to further their political dominion over Europe:
-
by compelling kings to
acknowledge them as their masters
-
by granting to such kings
dominion over lands of which the papacy claimed
ownership
-
by making the spiritual and
political dominion of the Church supreme in the lands
thus “let” to friendly nations.
The most famous example of such a
bargain in transfer is undoubtedly Ireland. Ireland had been for
some time the prey of internecine wars which were steadily but
surely bringing it to total state of quandary. By 1170, in fact, she
had already had sixty-one kings. It so happened that the popes,
having decided to bring the Irish, among whom were “many pagan,
ungodly and rebellious rulers,” under the stern hand of Mother
Church, planned a grand strategy thanks to which they would not only
impose the discipline of their religious system, but also tie to the
papacy more firmly than ever the English kingdom by conferring upon
the English monarch the sole right to conquer that island and
subjugate its people.
In this way the popes would achieve
several goals simultaneously: they would re-impose their authority on
Ireland, strengthen their power over the English kingdom, and thus
also reinforce their hold upon France and indirectly upon the whole
of Europe.
It so happened that the English kings had entertained similar
designs, and also that at the time there was sitting in the papal
chair a man by the name of Nicholas Breakspeare, known as Hadrian
IV, an Englishman (1154-9), who made possible the English
subjugation of Ireland by his “Anglicana affectione,” as an Irish
chieftain declared in 1316 in a letter to Pope John XXII. King and
pope began to negotiate.
The pope was ready to confer the
dominion of Ireland on the English king, upon the condition that the
king accepted the doctrine of papal sovereignty, which implied that,
as King of England, he was a vassal of the pope. The king, on the
other hand, was ready to accept this upon the condition that the
papacy would support him in his military and political conquest of
he Irish by using the powerful machinery of the Church.
Fortune seemed to favor the project, for Diarmait, an Irish
potentate years before Henry became King of England, had brought him
a long-desired opportunity by proposing the conquest of Ireland.
Once the pope and the king were in agreement, Hadrian IV granted to
the England king the hereditary lordship of Ireland, sending a
letter with a ring as a symbol of investiture, thus conferring on
him dominion over the island of Ireland, which “like all Christian
islands, undoubtedly belonged of right to St. Peter and the Roman
Church”.
The papal grant, made in 1155, was kept a secret until after Henry
landed in Ireland in 1172. Thus the English received dominion over
Ireland on the grounds that the pontiffs were feudal lords of all
islands of the ocean, thanks to the Donation of Constantine.
The Irish conquest, ordered by Pope Hadrian IV, is authenticated by
a document popularly called the “Bull Laudabiliter,” found only in
the Roman Bullarium (1739) and in the Annals of Baronius, but its
authenticity has been accepted by Roman Catholic and Protestant
historians alike. The “Bull Laudabiliter” is inserted in the
Expugnatio Hibernica of Giraldus Cambrensis, published in or about
188, (1) wherein he asserts it to be the document brought from Rome
by John of Salisbury in 155.
He also gives with it a confirmation by
Alexander II, obtained, he states, by Henry II after his visit to
Ireland. John of Salisbury, the intimate friend and confidant of
Pope Hadrian, quotes also the Donation of Constantine, on the
grounds of this right of St. Peter over all islands. In addition to
these two documents, there are three letters from Alexander III,
which are similarly known to us only at second hand, being
transcribed in what is known as the Black Book of the Exchequer. (2)
In them, the pope expresses his warm
approval of Henry’s conquest of Ireland, calling his expedition as
missionary enterprise, praising him as a champion of the Church and
particularly of St. Peter and of his rights, which rights St. Peter
passed on to the popes. Especially significant is the fact that the
rights claimed by the popes under the Donation of Constantine, over
all islands, are here asserted, not so much as justifying the grant
of Ireland to Henry, but as entitling the papal see to claim those
rights for itself.
Such rights were still claimed by the Vatican in an official
document as recently as 1645. When in that year Pope Innocent X
dispatched Rinuccini as Papal Nuncio to Ireland, he gave him formal
instructions in which were included a brief outline of past events.
In it we find this definite and most striking passage:
For a long period the true faith maintained itself, till the
country, invaded by Danes, and idolatrous people, fell for the most
part into impious superstition. This state of darkness lasted till
the reigns of Adrian IV and of Henry II, King of England.
Henry, desiring to strengthen his empire and to secure the provinces
which he possessed belong the era in France, wished to subdue the
island of Ireland; and to compass this design had to recourse to
Adrian, who. himself an Englishman, with a liberal hand granted all
he coveted. The Zeal manifested by Henry to convert all Ireland to
the faith moved the soul of Pope Adrian to invest him with the
sovereignty of that island.
Three important conditions were annexed
to the gift:
-
That the King should do all in
his power to propagate the Catholic religion throughout
Ireland.
-
That each of his subjects should
pay an annual tribute of one penny to the Holy See, commonly
called Peter’s Pence.
-
That all the privileges and
immunities of the Church be held inviolate. (3)
These “conditions” were obtained through
papal authority and the king’s sword. When the King Henry seemed to
have firmly established himself on Irish soil, the pope strengthened
him by mobilizing the Irish Church in his support. Christian
O’Conarchy, Bishop of Lismore and Papal Legate, president at the
Synod, attended by the Archbishops of Dublin, Cashel and Tuam, their
suffragan abbots and other dignitaries. Henry’s sovereignty was
acknowledged and constitutions made which drew Ireland closer to
Rome than ever.
Thus it was one of the ironies of
history that Catholic Ireland was sold by the popes themselves to a
country destined to become the champion of Protestantism. But the
grant of Ireland had another great repercussion. It provided a
precedent to the popes, not only to claim and give away islands and
people, but also to give away a new world. For the language of the
grant of Hadrian IV and some of his successors developed principles
as yet unheard of in Christendom, since Hadrian had declared that
Ireland and all the islands belonged to the special jurisdiction of
St. Peter. (4)
This was not a rhetorical expression. It became a solid reality when
daring sailors began to discover lands in the until-then-uncharted
oceans. When in 1492 Christopher Columbus discovered Americas, his
finding not only stimulated a keener competition between the two
adventurous Iberian seafaring nations, but opened up to both Spain
and Portugal tremendous vistas of territorial, economic and
political expansion.
As soon as the race for the conquest of he western hemisphere began,
the pope came to the forefront, as a master and arbiter of the
continents to be conquered. For, if all islands belonged by right
to St. Peter, than all the newly-discovered and yet-to-be-discovered
lands with all riches, treasures and wealth in any form belonged to
the popes, his successors.
The New World thus had become the
possession of the papacy. It was as simple as that.
This was left neither to the realm of theoretical claims nor to that
of speculative rights. It was promptly acted upon, with full
authority. Pope Alexander VI, then the reigning pontiff, in fact,
one year only after the discovery of America - that is, in 1493 -
issued a document which is one of the most astounding papal writs of
all times. In it Pope Alexander VI, acting as the sole legal owner
of all islands of the oceans, granted all the lands yet to e
discovered to the King of Spain.
Here are the relevant words of this
celebrated decree:
“We are credibly informed that
whereas of late you were determined to seek and find certain
islands and firm lands, far remote and unknown .. you have
appointed our well-beloved son Christopher Columbus... to seek
(by sea, where hitherto no man hath sailed) such firm land and
islands far remote and hitherto unknown..
“.. We of our own motion, and by the fullness of Apostolical
power, do give grant and assign to you, our heirs and
successors, all power, do give grant and assign to you, your
heirs and successors, all the firm lands and islands founds or
to be found, discovered or to be discovered.” (5)
But then, since the rivalry between
Spain and Portugal threatened to imperil the situation, in 1494 the
Treaty of Tordesillas moved the papal line of demarcation to the
meridian 370 leagues west of the Azores. This brought Brazil into
existence.
Pope Leo, long after feudalism had passed away, upheld as
intransigently as ever the conception of earth-ownership. As world
suzerain, he granted to the King of Portugal permission to possess
all kingdoms and islands of the Far East, which he had wrested from
the infidel, and all that he would in future thus acquire, even
though up to that time unknown and undiscovered.(6)
The pope’s will
was soon to be infringed by rebellious nations such Protestant
England, Holland, and even Catholic countries like France. Yet it
was strong enough to transform two-thirds of the New World into the
spiritual domain of Rome.
The Donation of Constantine, therefore, was fraught with
incalculable consequences, not only for Italy, France, Germany,
England, Ireland and practically the whole of Europe, but also for
the Americas and for Near and Middle East. Indeed, in its full
extent found admittance even in Russia, for it exists in the Kormezaia Kniga, the Corpus juris Canonici of the Graeco-Slavonic
Church, which was translated from the Greek by a Serbian or
Bulgarian in the thirteenth or fourteenth century.
Many were those who rebelled against it.
Wetzeld, in a letter to the Emperor
Frederick, dated 1152, centuries before the English precursor of
Protestantism, Wycliff, had no hesitation in declaring:
“That lie and heretical fable of
Constantine’s having conceded the imperial rights in the city to
Pope Sylvester, was now so thoroughly exposed that, even day
laborers and women were able to confute the most learned on the
point, and the pope and his cardinals would not venture to show
themselves for shame.” (7)
The exposure of the falsity of the
Donation proceeded until the middle of the fifteenth century, when
three men succeeded, more than any others had done, in exploding the
myth on historical grounds, proving without doubt that the fact of
the Donation, no less than the document, was a fraudulent invention.
They were Reginal Pecock, Bishop of Chichester, Cardinal Cusa, and,
above all Lorenzo Valla, who proved that the popes had no right
whatever over any land in Europe and had not even the right to
possess the States of the Church in Italy or in Rome itself.
One of the most stubborn opponents of the Donation, a certain
Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini, Secretary to the Emperor Frederick
III, in 1443, went so far as to recommend that Emperor to summon a
council at which the question of the Donation of Constantine, “which
causes perplexity to many souls,” should be finally decided, on the
ground of the Donation’s “utter unauthenticity.”
Indeed, Piccolomini went further and
proposed that after the council had solemnly proclaimed the unauthenticity of the Donation, Frederick should take possession of
most of the territories included in it and openly reject all papal
claims of supremacy over rulers and nations.
Aeneas Sylvius
Piccolomini was afterwards Pope Pius II.
A century before him, Dante, who had not
hesitated to consign many popes to the hellish flames, uttered his
famous lamentation on the Donation:
“Ah, Constantine! Of how much ill
was mother, Not, thy conversion, but that marriage dower which
the first wealthy Father took from thee.”
Chapter 6
When The World Was
About To End - A.D. 1000
But, as if the ownership of immense territorial domains and, indeed,
the ownership of practically the whole of the western world were not
sufficient, the Roman Catholic Church, prior to, during and after
her acquisitions, set out with no less success to despoil of their
riches the faithful who lived in them.
This she did, via the greed
of rapacious priests with their misuse of religion, their abuse of
the credulity of multitudes, their exercise of fear and their
unscrupulous use of promises designed to extract from these people
land and valuables for which they had developed the most insatiable
appetite since the times of Constantine.
Thus, while the Church’s possessions, identified in the gradual
accumulation of lands, buildings and sundry good, multiplied with
the erection of new monasteries, nunneries, abbeys and the like, her
treasures in the shape of money, gold and jewels increased as new
monastic and ecclesiastical centers arose. These, besides becoming
the traditional repositories of the communal wealth became also the
collectors, and therefore the users, of the tithes and all other
legal, semi-legal and at times forced contributions which believers
were compelled to “donate”.
When to these were added the voluntary contributions of believers
either as a penance for their sins or as a thanksgiving for
celestial favors received or on their death-beds, then the total
wealth accumulated in the course of the centuries became equal to
that of any baron or prince. Indeed, a time arrived when it
surpassed the wealth of kings.
During the ninth and tenth centuries, after the time of the Emperor
Charlemagne, her riches, already magnitudinous, became even more so
by the accidental and planned combination of popular superstitions,
genuine misrepresentations of the Scriptures, and the cunning
promotion of a credence which in due course was accepted as the
fearful reality of the steadily identified with belief in the end of
all things. How such a prediction came to the fore and was so widely
adopted by the Roman Catholic Institution and, above all, by the
European populace, has yet to be assessed. Contributory factors of
varied character seem to have given solidity to the belief that the
world would come to an end with the closing of the first millennium
of Christianity.
The Gospels, which spoke of the “present generations” before the
coming of the Son of Man, became the main support of this belief -
at least as interpreted by an ignorant or cunning clergy; for it
must remembered that at this period the masses could neither read
nor write. Books |