SECOND COMING OF BEASTLY SEED
The connection between
the coming clash between these “seeds” and emerging Catholic exo-theology
will shock most, as it directly involves the arrival of
serpent-saviors and the birth of Apollo (a.k.a. Osiris) from “the
promised seed” of the novus ordo seclorum prophecy on the Great Seal
of the United States.
It is not just any Obelisk but one that was cut from a single block of red granite during the Fifth dynasty of Egypt to stand as Osiris’ (a.k.a. Apollo’s) erect phallus at the Temple of the Sun in ancient Heliopolis (Hλιούπολις, meaning city of the sun or principal seat of Atum-Ra sun-worship), the city of “On” in the Bible, dedicated to Ra, Osiris, and Isis.
The Obelisk was moved from Heliopolis to the Julian Forum of Alexandria by Emperor Augustus and later from thence (approximately 37 AD) by Caligula to Rome to stand at the spine of the Circus.
There, under Nero, its excited presence maintained a counter-vigil over countless brutal Christian executions, including the martyrdom of the apostle Peter (according to some historians). Over fifteen hundred years following that, Pope Sixtus V ordered hundreds of workmen under celebrated engineer-architects Giovanni and Domenico Fontana to move the phallic pillar to the center of St. Peter’s Square in Rome.
This proved a daunting task, which took over four months, nine hundred laborers, one hundred forty horses, and seventy winches.
Though worshipped at its present location ever since by countless admirers, the proximity of the Obelisk to the old Basilica was formerly,
The fact that many traditional Catholics as well as Protestants perceived such idols of stone to be not only objects of heathen adoration but the worship of demons (see Acts 7:41–42; Psalms 96:5; and 1 Corinthians 10:20) makes what motivated Pope Sixtus to erect the phallus of Osiris in the heart of St. Peter’s Square, located in Vatican City and bordering St. Peter’s Basilica where prophetic lightning struck it twice last week, very curious.
To ancient Christians, the image of a cross and symbol of Jesus sitting atop (or emitting from) the head of a demonic god’s erect manhood would have been at a minimum a very serious blasphemy.
Yet Sixtus was not content with simply restoring and using such ancient pagan relics (which were believed in those days to actually house the pagan spirit they represented) but even destroyed Christian artifacts in the process.
Michael W. Cole, Associate Professor in the Department of the History of Art at the University of Pennsylvania, and Professor Rebecca E. Zorach, Associate Professor of Art History at the University of Chicago, raise critical questions about this in their scholarly book The Idol in the Age of Art when they state:
The important point made by Professors Cole and Zorach is that at the time Sixtus was busy reintroducing to the Roman public square restored images and statues on columns, the belief remained strong that these idols housed their patron deity, and further that, if these were not treated properly and even placed into service during proper constellations related to their myth, it could beckon evil omens, such as lightning.
Most people including even perhaps Pope Benedict himself, were blissfully unaware of the ancient signature last week’s dual strikes atop St. Peter’s Basilica represented, especially as it involves the looming papal inauguration of Petrus Romanus. For a few adepts of history and secret orders, the sign from heaven was deliciously staged.
The term “inaugurate” is from the Latin “inauguratio,” and refers to the archaic ceremony by which the Roman augurs (soothsayers) approved a king or ruler (or other action) through omens as being “sanctioned by the gods.”
As for Petrus Romanus, his “inauguration” was sealed by the same omen the ancient augurs used in determining the will of the gods for a king - thunder and lightning as the most important auspice and sign that Jupiter - the father of Apollo - was watching.
There is strong indication that Pope Sixtus not only believed in such omens but that he,
This was clearly evident when the cross was placed on top of the Obelisk in the midst of St. Peter’s Square and the pope marked the occasion by conducting the ancient rite of exorcism against the phallic symbol.
First scheduled to occur on September 14th to coincide with the liturgical Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross and not coincidently under the zodiacal sign of Virgo (Isis), the event was delayed until later in the month and fell under the sign of Libra, representing a zenith event for the year.
On that morning, a pontifical High Mass was held just before the cross was raised from a portable altar to the apex of Baal’s Shaft (as such phallic towers were also known).
While clergy prayed and a choir sang Psalms, Pope Sixtus stood facing the Obelisk and, extending his hand toward it, announced:
Sixtus then cast sanctified water upon the pillar’s middle, then its right side, then left, then above, and finally below to form a cross, followed by,
He then crossed himself three times and watched as
the symbol of Christ was placed atop Osiris’ erect phallus.
This is no crude declaration, as adepts of ritual sex-magic know, and dates back to ancient women who wanted to give birth to the offspring of the gods and who judged the size of the male generative organ as indicative of the “giant” genetics or divine seed needed for such offspring.
phallic symbols have been and still are found in cultures around the
world, in ancient Egypt, devotion to this type “obscene divinity”
began with Amun-Min and reached its crescendo in the Obelisks of
This is important because, in addition to the Washington Monument being intentionally constructed to be the tallest Obelisk of its kind in the world at 6,666 (some say 6,660) inches high and 666 inches wide along each side at the base, one of the original concepts for the Washington Monument included Apollo (the Greek version of Osiris) triumphantly returning in his heavenly chariot, and another illustrating a tower “like that of Babel” for its head.
Any of these designs would have been equally appropriate to the thirty-three-hundred-pound pyramidal capstone it now displays, as all three concepts carried the meaning necessary to accomplish what late researcher David Flynn described as,
is to say, the “seed” discharged from a Tower-of-Babel-shaped head
would magically issue forth the same as would proceed from the
existing Egyptian capstone - the offspring of Apollo/Osiris/Nimrod.
Albert Pike described it as Isis and Osiris’,
The all-seeing eye of Horus/Osiris/Apollo above the unfinished pyramid on the Great Seal forecasts the culmination of this event - that is, the actual return of Osiris - for the United States.
This ancient occultism is troubling when harmonized with the two mottoes on the Great Seal - “annuit coeptis” and “novus ordo seclorum” - taken from ancient texts related to the god Apollo.
The motto “annuit coeptis” is from Virgil’s Aeneid, in which Ascanius, the son of Aeneas from conquered Troy, prays to Apollo’s father, Jupiter [Zeus] whose thunder and lightning marked Vatican Square on the resignation of Pope Benedict.
Charles Thompson, designer of the Great Seal’s final version, condensed line 625 of book IX of Virgil’s Aeneid, which reads,
Was Thompson instructed to do this to conceal the true identity of the “he” of the Great Seal - the mythical father-god Jupiter, who gives Apollo life?
The second and most indisputable authentication that the Great Seal’s symbols and mottoes are in fact a hidden prophesy concerning the return of Apollo is “novus ordo seclorum” (“a new order of the ages”), adapted by Charles Thomson in 1782 when designing the Great Seal.
According to the official record, Thomson - a friend of the Masons and great supporter of Benjamin Franklin’s American Philosophical Society - created the phrase from inspiration he found in a prophetic line in Virgil’s Eclogue IV:
This same Cumaean Sibyl is even prominently featured alongside Old Testament prophets in Michelangelo’s paintings in the Sistine Chapel at the Vatican. Yet upon reading Virgil’s text, it is abundantly clear whom the prophetess of Apollo - directly tied to Washington and the Vatican - was talking about.
The divine son, which comes of the Sibyl’s prophecy, is to be spawned of,
According to the
prophecy, this is Apollo, son of Jupiter (Zeus), who returns to
earth through mystical “life” given to him from the gods when the
deity returns to reign over the earth in a new golden age.
According to Virgil and the Cumaean Sibyl, whose prophecy formed the novus ordo seclorum of the Great Seal of the United States, the new world order begins during a time of chaos when the earth and oceans are tottering - a time like today.
This is when the “son” of promise arrives on earth - Apollo incarnate. His coming was augured by thunder and lightning just hours after Pope Benedict resigned, and now the Domes and Obelisks at the Vatican and Washington stand ready for the secret, metaphysical ritual to be performed to assure his arrival.
We use the phrase “performed in secret” because what the vast majority of people throughout America and Rome do not know is that the “raising” ceremony of Apollo/Osiris is conducted inside the headquarters of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry in the House of the Temple by the Supreme Council 33rd Degree over Washington, DC following the election and inauguration of every American President (just as their Egyptian forefathers did at the temple of Amun-Ra in Karnak) in keeping with the tradition of installing within him the representative spirit of Osiris until such time as the god himself shall fulfill the Great Seal prophecy and return in flesh - in other words, now.
The most recent Osiris-endowed US President,
headed for Israel to announce “peace, peace” at the very same time
the College of Cardinals will be assembling in Rome for conclave to
elect the prophesied final pope - Petrus Romanus.
...as a Newly Arrived “Alien” Serpent-Savior
Upon further contemplation, however, this is really not that astonishing.
It was, after all, the Roman Catholic theologians who provided the “liveliest speculation” on the existence and nature of extraterrestrials four years after Blish’s book was printed, when the executive secretary of the American Rocket Society published conjectures on the subject. [vii]
Since then, other Vatican authorities have further contended the extraterrestrials might actually express the glory of God better than we humans do, even leading mankind to venerate them as gods, a recurrent theme articulated among numerous Jesuit astronomers.
Father Daniel C. Raible thought the eventual acceptance of aliens as objects of worship might naturally occur as a result of them having godlike qualities and preternatural gifts ascribed by humans to divinity:
Father Domenico Grasso not only thought such beings would be, “far ahead of us in science and related fields,” [ix] but that their version of salvation might be based on a savior other than Jesus… even a messianic member of their own race.
These beings, closer to God than man (perhaps even unfallen), would possess superior theology that could “expand markedly” our terrestrial understanding of redemption and knowledge of God, something current Vatican theologians such as professor of fundamental theology at the Pontificia Università della Santa Croce in Rome [connected with Opus Dei], Giuseppe Tanzella-Nitti, agree with.
Another Church scholar, Father Thomas F. O’Meara, a theologian at the University of Notre Dame, imagined these godlike beings spread out across universes,
Such Catholic leaders believe these spiritually superior aliens may even have been created by God with the future redemption of humanity in mind - beings who know their place in the eternal scheme of things to evangelize humans when the time is right.
This disturbing and potentially prophetic belief is partially based on theological arguments made by such priests as Monsignor Januaris De Concilio, professor of theology at Immaculate Seminary in New Jersey, who believed,
Monsignor Corrado Balducci (who during his life was the official mouthpiece of the Roman Catholic Church concerning the reality of aliens) agreed with De Concilio, saying,
When imagining how this issue could finally be settled, Paul Thigpen for The Catholic Answer section of Our Sunday Visitor resolved that,
According to the Quran, the primary religious text of Islam, this encounter may happen sooner than most suspect and at a specific and hidden time that God Himself has already chosen.
In Revelation, Rationality, Knowledge & Truth, Muslim scholar Mirza Tahir Ahmad quotes verse 42:30 of the Quran, which says,
Ahmad says of this:
Furthermore, the expectation that aliens are headed our way extends to the nonreligious worldview as well.
Lewis White Black, a philosopher at the University of Rochester, writes,
Black then adds,
This applies broadly to other spiritualities as well.
For instance, the founder of analytical psychology, Carl Jung, wrote concerning ET belief:
Speaking of the UFO as an archetype, Jung describes its messianic qualities as creating,
Thus a belief in “godly” aliens that will ultimately come in contact
with man has wide interfaith acceptance among secularists,
spiritualists, and the world’s largest religions, who seem ready and
even excited about embracing their Official Disclosure moment -
something these authors believe holds dangerous and deceptive