by Peter Van Buren
June 30, 2013
from TomDispatch Website

 

 

 

Peter Van Buren blew the whistle on State Department waste and mismanagement in his book We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People.

A TomDispatch regular, he writes about current events at his blog, We Meant Well. Van Buren’s next book, Ghosts of Tom Joad, A Story of the #99Percent, is due out in March 2014


 

 

Sometimes, it’s hard to grasp just how our world has been transformed since September 11, 2001.

 

But here’s a little exchange at NBC Nightly News a few days back - just part of the humdrum flow of TV news-chat - that somehow caught my attention.

 

News anchor Brian Williams and Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent Andrea Mitchell were discussing how the Obama administration was dealing with NSA leaker Edward Snowden, then reportedly somewhere in the bowels of Moscow’s international airport.

 

Here was the exchange:

“Williams: The U.S. can say whatever it wishes and the press secretary can get angry and so on, what real power does the United States have here?

 

“Mitchell:  It’s got a lot of leverage against Russia and China. They’re working behind the scenes, but short of rendition - and that’s not going to happen getting him out of Russia - there’s isn’t anything physical that they can do. So they have to just exert the pressure and hope that diplomacy works, but Vladimir Putin is a tough customer.”

It was that reference to “rendition” - to, that is, the kidnapping of terror suspects by American forces (usually the CIA) off global streets (or highways or backlands) and their “rendering” to the United States, or to U.S. Navy ships in global waters, or to the prisons of allied regimes willing to torture any “suspect” and share whatever information (or misinformation) might be extracted with Washington.

 

For a while, this practice was called “extraordinary rendition,” but it’s now so deeply embedded in our American world that it’s become highly ordinary rendition.

 

In any case, the implication of Mitchell’s passing comment was that the U.S. wouldn’t “render” someone from an airport in the capital of a major power, but if that wasn’t,

“going to happen getting him out of Russia,” I think it’s hard not to complete Mitchell’s sentence with something like “it might be a perfectly reasonable option for Washington in, say, Ecuador.”

We are, in other words, in a new world where practices that once would have shocked have become the norm of news and pundit chitchat.

 

TomDispatch, however, refuses to consider any of this “normal.” 

 

We have over these last years regularly focused on the way Washington’s most oppressive powers have been wildly enhanced and on people we now know as “whistleblowers,” people like Bradley Manning, who saw something truly, unnervingly different in our American world and decided they just had to do something about it.

 

TomDispatch regular Peter Van Buren is one of them and today he considers what Snowden might be going through.

 

 

 

 

 

Edward Snowden’s Long Flight
What a Whistleblower Thinks a Fellow Whistleblower Might Have Thought
by Peter Van Buren

 

 

As a State Department whistleblower, I think a lot about Edward Snowden. I can’t help myself.

 

My friendships with other whistleblowers like Tom Drake, Jesslyn Radack, Daniel Ellsberg, and John Kiriakou lead me to believe that, however different we may be as individuals, our acts have given us much in common.

 

I suspect that includes Snowden, though I’ve never had the slightest contact with him. Still, as he took his long flight from Hong Kong into the unknown, I couldn’t help feeling that he was thinking some of my thoughts, or I his.

 

Here are five things that I imagine were on his mind (they would have been on mine) as that plane took off.

 

 

 

I Am Afraid

 

Whistleblowers act on conscience because they encounter something so horrifying, unconstitutional, wasteful, fraudulent, or mismanaged that they are overcome by the need to speak out.

 

There is always a calculus of pain and gain (for others, if not oneself), but first thoughts are about what you’ve uncovered, the information you feel compelled to bring into the light, rather than your own circumstances.

In my case, I was ignorant of what would happen once I blew the whistle. I didn’t expect the Department of State to attack me. National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Tom Drake was similarly unprepared. He initially believed that, when the FBI first came to interview him, they were on his side, eager to learn more about the criminal acts he had uncovered at the NSA.

 

Snowden was different in this. He had the example of Bradley Manning and others to learn from. He clearly never doubted that the full weight of the U.S. government would fall on him.

 

He knew what to fear. He knew the Obama administration was determined to make any whistleblower pay, likely via yet another prosecution under the Espionage Act (with the potential for the death penalty).

 

He also knew what his government had done since 9/11 without compunction: it had tortured and abused people to crush them; it had forced those it considered enemies into years of indefinite imprisonment, creating isolation cells for suspected terrorists and even a pre-trial whistleblower.

 

It had murdered Americans without due process, and then, of course, there were the extraordinary renditions in which U.S. agents kidnapped perceived enemies and delivered them into the archipelago of post-9/11 horrors.

 

Sooner or later, if you’re a whistleblower, you get scared. It’s only human. On that flight, I imagine that Edward Snowden, for all his youthful confidence and bravado, was afraid.

 

Would the Russians turn him over to Washington as part of some secret deal, maybe the sort of spy-for-spy trade that would harken back to the Cold War era?

 

Even if he made it out of Moscow, he couldn’t have doubted that the full resources of the NSA and other parts of the U.S. government would be turned on him. How many CIA case officers and Joint Special Operations Command types did the U.S. have undercover in Ecuador? After all, the dirty tricks had already started.

 

The partner of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, who broke Snowden's story, had his laptop stolen from their residence in Brazil. This happened only after Greenwald told him via Skype that he would send him an encrypted copy of Snowden’s documents. 

 

In such moments, you try to push back the sense of paranoia that creeps into your mind when you realize that you are being monitored, followed, watched. It’s uncomfortable, scary.

 

You have to wonder what your fate will be once the media grows bored with your story, or when whatever government has given you asylum changes its stance vis-a-vis the U.S. When the knock comes at the door, who will protect you?

 

So who can doubt that fear made the journey with him?

 

 

 

Could I Go Back to the U.S.?

 

Amnesty International was on target when it stated that Snowden,

“could be at risk of ill-treatment if extradited to the U.S.”

As if to prove them right, months, if not years, before any trial,

  • Speaker of the House John Boehner called Snowden a “traitor

  • Congressman Peter King called him a “defector

  • others were already demanding his execution

If that wasn’t enough, the abuse Bradley Manning suffered had already convinced Snowden that a fair trial and humane treatment were impossible dreams for a whistleblower of his sort. (He specifically cited Manning in his appeal for asylum to Ecuador.)

 

So on that flight he knew - as he had long known - that the natural desire to go back to the U.S. and make a stand was beyond foolhardy. Yet the urge to return to the country he loves must have been traveling with him, too.

 

Perhaps on that flight he found himself grimly amused that, after years of running roughshod over international standards - Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, “enhanced interrogation techniques,” “black sites” - the U.S. had the nerve to chide Hong Kong, China, and Russia for not following the rule of law.

 

He certainly knew that his own revelations about massive NSA cyber-spying on Hong Kong and China had deeply embarrassed the Obama administration.

 

It had, after all, been blistering the Chinese for hacking into U.S. military and corporate computers. He himself had ensured that the Chinese wouldn’t turn him over, in the same way that history - decades of U.S. bullying in Latin America - ensured that he had a shot at a future in someplace like in Ecuador.

 

If he knew his extradition history, Snowden might also have thought about another time when Washington squirmed as a man it wanted left a friendly country for asylum.

 

In 2004, the U.S. had chess great Bobby Fischer detained in Japan on charges that he had attended a 1992 match in Yugoslavia in violation of a U.S. trade ban.

 

Others suggested that the real reason Washington was after him may have been Fischer’s post 9/11 statement:

"It's time to finish off the U.S. once and for all. This just shows what comes around, goes around."

Fischer’s American passport was revoked just like Snowden’s.

 

In the fashion of Hong Kong more recently, the Japanese released Fischer on an immigration technicality, and he flew to Iceland where he was granted citizenship. I was a diplomat in Japan at the time, and had a ringside seat for the negotiations.

 

They must have paralleled what went on in Hong Kong:

  • the appeals to treaty and international law

  • U.S. diplomats sounding like so many disappointed parents scolding a child

  • the pale hopes expressed for future good relations

  • the search for a sympathetic ear among local law enforcement agencies, immigration, and the foreign ministry - anybody, in fact,

...and finally, the desperate attempt to call in personal favors to buy more time for whatever Plan B might be.

 

As with Snowden, in the end the U.S. stood by helplessly as its prey flew off.

 

 

 

How Will I Live Now?

 

At some point every whistleblower realizes his life will never be the same.

 

For me, that meant losing my job of 24 years at the State Department. For Tom Drake, it meant financial ruin as the government tried to bankrupt him through endless litigation.

 

For CIA agent John Kiriakou, it might have been the moment when, convicted of disclosing classified information to journalists, he said goodbye to his family and walked into Loretto Federal Correctional Institution.

 

Snowden could not have avoided anxiety about the future.

 

Wherever he ended up,

  • How would he live?

  • What work would he do?

He’s just turned 30 and faces, at best, a lifetime in some foreign country he’s never seen where he might not know the language or much of anything else.

 

So fear again, in a slightly different form.

 

It never leaves you, not when you take on the world’s most powerful government.

  • Would he ever see his family and friends again?

  • Would they disown him, fearful of retaliation or affected by the smear campaign against him?

  • Would his parents/best friend/girlfriend come to believe he was a traitor, a defector, a dangerous man?

All whistleblowers find their personal relationships strained.

 

Marriages are tested or broken, friends lost, children teased or bullied at school. I know from my own whistleblower’s journey that it’s an ugly penalty - encouraged by a government scorned - for acting on conscience.

 

If he had a deeper sense of history, Snowden might have found humor in the way the Obama administration chose to revoke his passport just before he left Hong Kong. After all, in the Cold War years, it was the “evil empire,” the Soviet Union, which was notorious for refusing to grant dissidents passports, while the U.S. regularly waived such requirements when they escaped to the West.

 

To deepen the irony of the moment, perhaps he was able to Google up the 2009-2011 figures on U.S. grants of asylum:

  • 1,222 Russians

  • 9,493 Chinese

  • 22 Ecuadorians,

...not including family members.

 

Maybe he learned that, despite the tantrums U.S. officials threw regarding the international obligation of Russia to extradite him, the U.S. has recently refused Russian requests to extradite two of its citizens.

 

Snowden might have mused over then-candidate Obama's explicit pledge to protect whistleblowers.

"Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government," Obama then said, "is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism... should be encouraged rather than stifled as they have been during the Bush administration."

It might have been Snowden's only laugh of the flight.

 

 

 

I Don’t Hate the U.S., I Love It Deeply, But Believe It Has Strayed

 

On that flight, Snowden took his love of America with him.

 

It’s what all of us whistleblowers share: a love of country, if not necessarily its government, its military, or its intelligence services. We care what happens to us the people. That may have been his anchor on his unsettling journey. It would have been mine.

 

Remember, if we were working in the government in the first place, like every federal employee, soldier, and many government contractors, we had taken an oath that stated:

“I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

We didn’t pledge fealty to the government or a president or party, only - as the Constitution makes clear - to the ultimate source of legitimacy in our nation, “the people.”

 

In an interview, Snowden indicated that he held off on making his disclosures for some time, in hopes that Barack Obama might look into the abyss and decide to become the bravest president in our history by reversing the country’s course.

 

Only when Obama’s courage or intelligence failed was it time to become a whistleblower.

 

Some pundits claim that Snowden deserves nothing, because he didn’t go through “proper channels.” They couldn’t be more wrong and Snowden knows it. As with many of us whistleblowers facing a government acting in opposition to the Constitution, Snowden went through the channels that matter most: he used a free press to speak directly to his real boss, the American people.

 

In that sense, whatever the fear and anxiety about his life and his future, he must have felt easy with his actions. He had not betrayed his country, he had sought to inform it.

 

As with Bradley Manning, Obama administration officials are now claiming that Snowden has blood on his hands.

 

Typically, Secretary of State John Kerry claimed:

“People may die as a consequence to what this man did. It is possible that the United States would be attacked because terrorists may now know how to protect themselves in some way or another that they didn't know before.”

Snowden had heard the same slurs circling around Bradley Manning: that he had put people in danger.

 

After the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to speak of the war on terror, there is irony too obvious to dwell upon in such charges. Flying into the unknown, Snowden had to feel secure in having risked everything to show Americans how their government and the NSA bend or break laws to collect information on us in direct conflict with the Fourth Amendment’s protections.

 

Amnesty International pointed out that blood-on-hands wasn’t at issue.

"It appears he is being charged primarily for revealing U.S. and other governments’ unlawful actions that violate human rights.”

Those whispers of support are something to take into the dark with you.

 

 

 

I Believe in Things Bigger Than Myself

 

Some of the charges against Snowden would make anyone pause: that, for instance, he did what he did for the thrill of publicity, out of narcissism, or for his own selfish reasons.

 

To any of the members of the post-9/11 club of whistleblowers, the idea that we acted primarily for our own benefit has a theater of the absurd quality to it. Having been there, the negative sentiments expressed do not read or ring true.

 

Snowden himself laughed off the notion that he had acted for his own benefit.

 

If he had wanted money, any number of foreign governments would have paid handsomely for the information he handed out to journalists for free and he would never have had to embark on that plane flight from Hong Kong. (No one ever called Aldrich Ames a whistleblower.)

 

If he wanted fame, there were potential book contracts and film deals to be had.

 

No, it was conscience.

 

I wouldn’t be surprised if somewhere along the line Snowden had read the Declaration of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal:

"Individuals have international duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience. Therefore individual citizens have the duty to violate domestic laws to prevent crimes against peace and humanity from occurring."

Edward Snowden undoubtedly took comfort knowing that a growing group of Americans are outraged enough to resist a government turning against its own people.

 

His thoughts were mirrored by Julian Assange, who said,

“In the Obama administration's attempt to crush these young whistleblowers with espionage charges, the U.S. government is taking on a generation, a young generation of people who find the mass violation of the rights of privacy and open process unacceptable.

 

In taking on the generation, the Obama administration can only lose.”

Snowden surely hoped President Obama would ask himself why he has pursued more than double the number of Espionage Act cases of all his presidential predecessors combined, and why almost all of those prosecutions failed.

 

On that flight, Edward Snowden must have reflected on what he had lost, including the high salary, the sweet life in Hawaii and Switzerland, the personal relationships, and the excitement of being on the inside, as well as the coolness of knowing tomorrow’s news today.

 

He has already lost much that matters in an individual life, but not everything that matters.

 

Sometimes - and any whistleblower comes to know this in a deep way - you have to believe that something other, more, deeper, better than yourself matters.

 

You have to believe that one courageous act of conscience might make a difference in an America gone astray or simply that, matter or not, you did the right thing for your country.