I recently received requests from two different readers, one asking for articles covering the "mindset" of globalists (why they do what they do), and another request for articles covering globalist "occultism."
I find that these two topics are very difficult to pursue with a large number of people for a few reasons:
So, as you can see, it is a veritable circus of horrors whenever I write on the subject of who the globalists really are and what they really want.
Beyond that, it is very difficult to examine this subject matter, even with ample evidence, without coming off like a wackaloon.
It is hard enough convincing people of the obvious economic crisis facing America and the rest of the world and convincing them to put in minimal effort to prepare, let alone convincing them of the psychopathic and cult-like nature of the elite behind that crisis.
In other words, if you approach someone new to this information cold and hit them right away with tales of,
..you probably aren't going to get your foot in the door.
That said, I'll address the inevitable arguments above very quickly before I begin an analysis of the Globalist mind.
Now, I do believe in full-spectrum crisis and societal collapse, because these events have happened over and over again and can even be reasonably predicted according to past indicators.
I also believe that current events are rife with such indicators and that a collapse is taking place in stages today. I also know that there are groups of elites engineering this collapse and I know exactly why because they have openly admitted their goals (read The Economic End Game Explained).
Apocalypse is not my concern. Right and wrong, justice and tyranny are my concerns.
I'll leave the rest to more omniscient and omnipresent beings.
The problem we face is organized evil
Now that the above questions are out of the way we can jump into the core of the problem. And no, the core of the problem is not the "system" we live in per se, or our methodology of living and progressing as a species.
Again, there are too many eggheads in the liberty movement that like to pretend they have grand and ingenious new ways of looking at the world, and if only we would just "listen to their brilliant vision" everything would change for the better.
When you boil down their philosophies you often find they have no new ideas whatsoever, or that their ideas cannot be implemented because they have not dealt with the elephant in the room - the globalists.
Philosophy without tangible action and verifiable results is ultimately useless in the face of true evil. Intellectual warriors rarely win wars, but they do often die horribly as a result of their naivety and defenselessness.
To answer the question in the title of this article, yes, the globalists are in fact evil and the only misunderstandings are on the part of wide-eyed skeptics that have bought into the idea that "evil" is a moral conception created by religion rather than an inherent quality of human beings. This is false.
As Carl Jung discovered in his studies on the collective unconscious, people are born with inherent and conflicting conceptions and traits, or "dualities."
Good vs. Evil is an important duality we all come in to the world dealing with, it is not a mere product of environment or religious influence. That which is "good" is often dictated by what we call "conscience," which again is an inherent idea or "voice," and is only partly influenced by environment.
The fact of inherent character traits and universal moral codes is present in anthropological studies as well as psychological studies beyond Jung's very extensive work.
To define evil, we would have to look at those ideas and actions that are opposite inherent conscience. The globalists have basically constructed a festering belief system around everything that is contrary to our moral compass.
I will attempt to dissect some elements of that belief system from a secular point of view.
Wish me luck…
Occultism in itself is not necessarily "evil," it only means "secret knowledge."
But the history of occultism is plagued by rather evil deeds and attitudes. John F. Kennedy once warned of secret societies and secret proceedings, and with good reason.
For thousands of years, occult groups often withheld valuable knowledge from the masses as a means to influence behavior and control the direction of society. This did not have to be "magical" knowledge, whatever that means. Usually, it was scientific or psychological knowledge.
Say for example that a group of elitists withheld detailed knowledge of an impending economic collapse because this knowledge gave them a feeling of superiority and an advantage that they could exploit to gain power over others. Often, occult knowledge, secret knowledge, is driven by the selfish desire of one group to maintain a sense of dominance over another.
Is it evil to withhold knowledge that could save lives for the sake of self-elevation?
I would say absolutely...
So yeah, it's almost impossible to broach this subject without sounding crazy to people who aren't already familiar with it.
But as requested, I'll take a stab at it.
Do globalists really believe in a devil with a pitchfork and hoofs and horns? I really don't know. What I do know is that many of them believe in the ideas behind the mythology of the figure (even Saul Alinsky dedicated his book 'Rules for Radicals' to Lucifer).
The Lucifer mythology is one of rebellion, a rebellion against the the Christian God.
But how would this translate to elitist behavior? They define inherent conscience and moral compass (checks and balances put in place by God?) as a "restriction" or imprisonment of the individual, and they seem to only esteem individuals as those seeking their own "Godhood."
The way liberty proponents value individualism is very different from the way elitists value individualism.
Lucifer as a archetypal figure represents a rebellion against everything, including nature. Of course, nature is not a toy to be played with selfishly because catastrophe inevitably results.
Moral compass is a guide that keeps humanity from destroying itself, and without it civilizations fall. Luciferianism, at the very least, fosters destructive tendencies.
With such people at the helm of entire nations, innocent people will suffer in the scorched path of elites seeking to rebel against inherent moral and natural boundaries, and this is without a doubt evil.
Do what thou wilt
Attributed to Aleister Crowley, a self-professed satanist, you will see this ideology pop up in globalist circles and pop-culture icons alike.
Crowley apologists often argue that the quote it is taken from refers to the "law of love."
The latter interpretation is clearly the one globalists have taken to heart.
Since elitists consistently treat the lowly masses as vermin that need to be eradicated for the good of the planet, I see little indication that they have the ability to conceive of love, let alone adopt a philosophy of love.
Do what thou wilt, however the idea was originally intended, has become a rationale for the globalist propensity of crushing others in the name of "greatness".
Evil people are not as immune to the judgments of others as you might think.
In fact, many of them become a bit obsessive about people accepting or even praising the things they do. I can only theorize that if in their minds everyone else subscribes to an evil behavior then it is no longer evil, but normal.
Moral relativism is the act of rationalizing a destructive or evil process by claiming a positive end result or intention washes away responsibility. The ends justify the means.
Globalists could not care less about the consequences of their actions to others, but they do feel the need to justify those actions in a way that people will embrace.
From my observations, the majority of globalist propaganda revolves entirely around the concept of moral relativism, and the lie that good is only about perception while evil is a "gray area," or an illusion.
As Kevin Spacey says in the movie The Usual Suspects,
As stated earlier,
It is interesting how many people strive so hard to avoid acknowledging the fight that is coming by clinging to the notion that the globalists are "misunderstood" or "not important" in the grand scheme of things.
While I work to promote alternative trade models through localism and alternative-security models through community preparedness teams, I also accept that these efforts are a half measure, mere preparation for an unavoidable conflict between people who hold the contents of their conscience dear, those who view the non-aggression principle as an integral part of a free and healthy civilization and the globalists, who hold nothing dear accept themselves, their cult and their ambitions.
Evil is a part of every human being, just as good is a part of every human being. It is a battle we all struggle with until the day we die. But organized evil is something else entirely.
It is not something we have to tolerate, and it is something we can change.
Until it is expunged from our society, no other solutions can be fully enacted. Therefore, the solution begins with the end of organized evil, and it is a solution I plan to enact in my own way.
The solution begins with the eradication of the globalists...