from Soveriegn.freeservers.com

Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Introduction

 

The symbol on the right, from the seal of the United States on a $1 bill, is that of the Bavarian Illuminati, one of several Rothschild political vehicles.

 

The inscription below translates to "NEW WORLD ORDER". Historically, the Illuminati was responsible for instigating the French Revolution after infiltrating the French Freemasons. Since then, the Illuminati is usually disregarded by the media as a delusional fantasy. Now why would they do that?
 

If this breakdown sounds Orwellian, it should, because all of my research on this points to an organization which is attempting to impose an Orwellian system of government, not just on the U.S., but on the whole world, and they are succeeding.

 

The Rothschilds, along with some of their associated banking families, have long been involved in the creation and/or development of such movements as the Bavarian Illuminati, the Zionist movement, International Communism, the Bolshievik Revolution, and the German National Socialist party (Nazis). Their biggest customers for loans are governments.

 

To secure those loans, as with any other, they need security. They acquire that security two ways: By lending to competing countries to maintain a military balance, and by setting up national banks under their control.

"New World Order" (also translated as "New Order of the Centuries") was by no means new with the creation of the Great Seal of the United States. It is an old Illuminati slogan, used by Adolph Hitler, and later, by President George Bush, the son of a Hitler supporter, Prescott Bush. Perhaps this is mere coincidence, but is that really likely? Particularly in light of the fact that George is a member of the same Skull and Bones Society that his father used as a cover for transferring funds to Hitler?

The Illuminati was founded in Bavaria in 1792, by a Freemason grandmaster named Adam Weishaupt.

 

Adam received backing from the Rothschild family to build the Illuminati. He even converted to the Rothschild religion. He had been a Jesuit, but became a Jew. His followers were drawn, primarily, from Bavarian Freemason masters, who then attempted to use the Bavarian Freemasons to overthrow the Bavarian government. They were found out, and fled to Paris, where they infiltrated the French Freemasons.

 

The revolutionary cry of "Liberty, Fraternity, Equality" was taken right out of the principles of Freemasonry. The same principles influenced the American Revolution and the Constitutional Conventions, as most of the instigators in those events were Freemasons.

 

"Liberty, Fraternaty, Equality", however, was not what the French got. Something went seriously wrong.

The Freemasons are an ancient society that long operated under cover of a masonís guild. Throughout the Dark Ages, they preserved the ideals of freedom and equality for all men, while such things were persecuted relentlessly by the Catholic Church.

 

The Black Plague left Europe with little need for masons, so they had to expand their range of applicants, to include other professions, including doctors and lawyers. With the decline of the papacy, the freemasons got a whole new playing field, with new opportunities. Somebody grabbed the freemasons by their leadership. That somebody was Adam Wieshaupt, an agent of the Rothschilds.

"The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" outlines a devious plan for world domination.

 

Widely dismissed as a forgery created with anti-semitic intentions, I have yet to see any critics deal with the question Henry Ford once raised:

"...why is it so damned prophetic?"

This document claims to be a record of the proceedings of the First Zionist Congress, held in 1870.

 

As such, it likely is a forgery, but it closely resembles an older document, found on the body of an Illuminati courier who had been struck by lightning en route from Bavaria to Paris. It was the discovery of this document which tipped off Bavarian police to the plans of the Illuminati.

Forgery it may be, but it is far too elaborate, detailed and well-thought-out to be just fiction. Perhaps someone noted patterns in events and pieced the plan together, ascribing cause to a people he detested. Perhaps this someone was both sufficiently educated, and sufficiently paranoid schizophrenic, to interpret the pattern in such bizarre fashion.

 

Hitler saw it, and he ascribed the cause to Jews, because he read the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" and took it at face value. Or perhaps thatís just what he wanted people to believe, because Hitler accepted backing from the same Jewish bankers that he railed against in his "Mein Kampf". Even the Protocols, however, cautions against letting the average Jew in on the plan.
 


The Plan

To destroy or take away the power of all the royal families of Europe.

 

Monarchy is to be replaced with democratic republics, temporarily. Democracy is to be undermined with economic wars, writing bad laws, twisting good laws, take over education, invention of crises, swamping governments with lobbyists, lawyers, licensing laws and regulations.

 

It has been over two centuries since the Illuminati was founded, over a century since the Protocols were written; we are there.
 

Go Back

 

 


Ministry of "Prosperity" - The Federal Reserve Board


The Federal Reserve Bank was created by associates of the Rothschilds with the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

 

The chief architect was Paul Moritz Warburg, with help from the Loeb, Schiff, and Morgan banking families. The Federal Reserve was ostensibly created to stabilize the economy, but between 1923 and 1929, the Fed printed up a whopping 62% inflation rate, then suddenly stopped, throwing the country into the crash of 1929, followed by a numbing depression.

The Federal Reserve had a predecessor in the Second Bank of the United States, which had been dismantled at the order of President Andrew Jackson, putting an end to a major depression in his time. The Great Depression of the thirties, however, had a Rothschild lacky in F.D.R., who prolonged the agony, so as to maximize property foreclosures, allowing bankers to make a killing when the economy bounced back.

 

This also put the bankers in the position of being landlords of properties once owned, with allodial title, by sovereign citizens.

The primary intentions of the Fed, however, was to usurp the power of Congress and the U.S. Treasury over our governmentís, and our countryís, finances. Itís chairman, appointed by Congress, has only nominal power.

 

The Fed is NOT a government agency, but a totally private corporation owned by about twelve banking families, including the Rothschilds, and those mentioned above.
 


I.R.S. (Internal Revenue Service)

The enforcement arm of the Fed, is the Internal Revenue Service, established by the Rothschilds in 1933 as a "soak the rich" scam. It is also a private corporation. It serves to collect tribute from the American public, which is then channeled through the Fed, into Rothschild pet projects.

 

"Internal" means that it was set up to collect money "internal" to the federal government, NOT from private citizens, who are actually paying the bulk of the tribute. Our money supply is loaned into circulation by the Fed, charging interest which cannot be paid until taken out of the next yearís principle. Money collected by the IRS is sent to the Fed (NOT the Treasury). It is then credited towards the principle on the money supply (the interest does not exist yet), with the actual funds send to the Soviet Union, Red China and other Rothschild projects.

Federal Reserve notes not only violate a Constitutional prohibition against paper money (Article 1, Section 10), but are also in violation of 12 USC 411, which restricts them to transfers between member banks of the Federal Reserve Board, and 18 USC 334, which makes it a felony to release them into general circulation, except in accordance with law. Now, title 18 is law, but title 12 is not.

 

Does that mean that they may be circulated anywhere? Or doesnít it really mean they may not be circulated at all?

It is even worse. Federal Reserve notes are insurance script; anything purchased with them belongs, not to the purchaser, but to that party whose name is on the script: Federal Reserve. What does it all mean? Our leaders have sold out our country for some gold beads and an illusion of power. They have betrayed us; they have betrayed their office, they have committed treason against the people and Constitution of the United States of America.

 

As such, they have shown themselves unfit for anything but imprisonment.


Go Back

 

 


Ministry of "Justice" - American Bar Association


The American Bar Association was founded by the Rothschild banking family in 1870, in Indiana. All members of the Judiciary and 71% of all legislatures, federal, state and local, are Bar Association members.

 

This places at least two branches of our government under their control. This is a conflict of interest. Lawyers have a stake in writing bad laws, because good laws donít make them much money, for the simple reason that good laws tend to be obeyed. Bad laws are not.
 


Where lawyers go, crime follows
The very first law passed by the Indiana legislature, after its takeover by the Bar Association, was to prohibit private citizens (laymen) from practicing law. This was an unconstitutional ruling designed to create a monopoly over the interpretation of law and the manner of its practice.

Even before the founding of the American Bar Association, lawyers were granted a title of nobility, "Esquire", by the Rothschild family. This was so scandalous in the early 1800ís that an amendment was ratified to make it a felony for anyone in government to hold a title of nobility. Efforts were promptly made, however, to bury the new amendment and destroy all traces of it from the law books and history books.

 

Evidence has since surfaced on this, but lawyers continue to deny its existence. Proof that this amendment had, in fact been ratified, have surfaced in a sufficient number of states, but lawyers continue to deny it, for the reason that it threatens to expose every single lawyer in the United States, as a traitor to the United States.

 

Every lawyer bears a title of nobility. Every lawyer is party to imposing a foreign jurisdiction in almost every courtroom in the country, making the United States Constitution unavailable, and our Constitutional Rights inaccessible to Americans.

 

This is treason against the people and Constitution of the United States.

 

There is no longer any room for doubt:
 


ALL LAWYERS ARE TRAITORS!
All Lawyers are beholden to, and are licensed to operate under, the same jurisdiction complained about in the Declaration of Independence, that King George was imposing a "jurisdiction foreign to our soil".

All Lawyers are in the business of taking away Constitutional Rights from sovereign citizens and giving their power to a foreign banking family.

Now, before you think to go out and shoot lawyers, realize that the vast majority of them wear heavy blinders. They have been brainwashed in law school to think they are performing a public service.

 

They no more think themselves traitors than do Fundamentalists think themselves un-Christian when they justify violations of Christís commandments on quotes from the Old Testament or Paulís Epistles. Both groups are unconscious of their crimes. Persecuting either misses the point and would only create worse crimes.

 

What is needed is to expose these blinders and the hidden agendas of those who seek to impose them.

 

Violence only begets violence

Ends cannot justify Means, because Ends always reflect their Means

 

Terms and examples:

Interpretation of law means many real laws, like 18 USC 241-242, which are supposed to protect us from violations of our Constitutional Rights, are made unenforceable. You canít find lawyers who will prosecute such cases, even though they pay well, IF you can fight it to a high enough court where the Constitution actually means something.

 

At the local and state level, civil rights cases are usually thrown out as "frivolous". Usually, thatís because the stateís case is frivolous, but they canít afford to let anyone know that. At the Supreme Court level, you are lucky if it gets heard. The Supreme Court can chose not to look at it.

 

Consequently, even in areas where the state or local governments have already been shown to be in violation, as with professional licensing, and with licensing and registration for passenger cars and drivers, no charges get enforced and the responsible agencies continue violating the law with impunity.

The manner of practice, means that we no longer have access to true Common-law trials. The Bill-of-Rights was not new; it largely codified rights traditionally covered under Common Law. Common Law also included an approach to court procedure which put the jury, and not the judge, in charge.

 

The jury could ask the questions.

 

The jury could decide what evidence was admissible. The jury was supposed to judge BOTH the law and the defendant. The judge was merely a referee and legal consultant. This had the advantage that the first priority in the proceedings was to find the truth. No longer. The Bar Association has corrupted it, substituting more and more elements of Law in Equity, Merchantile Law, Admiralty, Maritime Law, Law Merchant, Military Law, but usually known as Civil Law.

 

This system places the judge in the position of being a dictator in the court. The judge is still technically bound by the decision of the jury, if you can get one, but they can now dictate what evidence may or may not be admissible, and may even lie to jurors about their responsibilities.

 

The result is an adversarial system, a gladiatorial contest in which champions of the two sides fight with words, writs, and procedures. The defendants are completely at the mercy of lawyers whose competence they are allowed little or no foreknowledge of. In most types of cases, like traffic courts, the jurisdiction and manner of practice are wholly Civil/Equity/Maritime. As such, you do not have any rights; you have no power over your circumstances; you are reduced to a mere pawn in the hand of petty tyrants.

Examples:

  • Driverís licensing and Auto registration

  • Marriage Licensing and Childrenís Services

  • Gun Licensing and Registration

 

Non-Law
Then there is the non-laws. Many which admit not having been passed, like Aliens and Nationality (title 8), Internal Revenue Code (title 26), Food and Drugs (title 21), and more, are enforced at the point of a gun. Less than half of the titles of United States Code have been passed into positive law.

 

Many are enforced anyway. Others, which have been enacted (like parts of title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure), are only enforced when it is convenient, if at all.

In addition to the laws never passed into positive law, there are also innumerable agencies writing codes and regulations for every imaginable aspect of our lives.

 

Few, if any, of these agencies submit their regulations to proper legislative procedure (Voting-in and enactment by voters or the proper elected officials). Instead, they are simply written by committees of appointed bureaucrats, who then proceed to enforce them, like petty dictators, often with criminal penalties.

 

Since these are not usually subject to enactment by proper legislative procedure, they are, by the Bar Associationís own definitions, non-laws and enforcement of them is a crime. Lawyers, however, having conspired to create these non-laws and the incomes they generate, likewise also conspire to prevent enforcement against them.

In every instance, when the enforcement of non-law involves the collection of money, involuntarily, such enforcement fits precisely the definition of extortion, as given by federal law.

The Bar Association is also charged with generating laws and codes which serve Rothschild interests, which include a number of large corporations and whole industries, in which the Rothschilds and their associate bankers have invested. These include drug companies, oil companies, insurance companies, auto and munitions manufacturers, and the mass media.
 


Professional Licensing
Many of the laws they create set up licensing systems, ostensibly to protect the public, but in practice only protect the licensed professionals, reducing their liability, making them less accountable in case of misconduct.

 

Such accountability is usually better served by Common Law torts, than by a system that places it primarily in the hands of peers who stand to lose if misdeeds are publicized. Licensing can also make it harder to get into a field you feel qualified for, in violation of the Constitutional protection of Right to Work (1).

 

It also places whole professions under foreign jurisdiction, allowing lawyers to impose regulations prohibited under the Constitution, reducing our Rights to privileges. Privileges are easily revocable.

Examples:

  • Architectural licensing

  • Builderís licensing

  • Physicianís licensing

  • Psychologist and Psychiatrist licensing

 

Regulatory Agencies
Still other laws, and non-laws, create regulatory agencies, ostensibly to protect the public, but in practice only protect the industries they are supposed to regulate.

 

These agencies tend to get staffed by lawyers who know little about the industry they are charged with regulating, so they go to the very industry which they have been charged with. The industrialists tell the regulators what they want to hear, and hold out prospects of juicy retirement positions for regulators who serve their profits.

 

If a regulatory director does not cow-tow to the suggestions of industry, then the industry can lobby to Congress to have him replaced. Hence, congressmen, to maximize campaign contributions, place directors who cheerfully sell out every principle the agency was ostensibly built on.

Examples:

  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

  • Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

  • City Planning

  • Government Employment Practices

Comíon, how many do you need? If you are in denial, no number of examples will be enough.

Lawyers have subsequently taken every measure to obfuscate the law, creating a whole new language, which although it sounds, superficially, like english, the definitions of words may differ tremendously. They have created non-laws outside the scope of the Constitution, and often enforced with more vigor and stiffer penalties than legitimate law.

 

They have even conspired to change laws by changing existing legal definitions, without legislation. For this reason, old editions of Blackís Law Dictionary from prior to 1930, have become extremely valuable. Words like "income", which previously excluded wages ("compensation") now include wages, thereby expanding the scope of tax codes without benefit of legislation.

We are left with a real dilemma. Because the Bar Association has established a total monopoly over the interpretation and manner of practice of law, they can, as an organization, commit any crimes, perpetuate any scams, upon the american public with total impunity.

 

They need only put a plausible face on it. If anyone sees through it, they are impotent to act, as all avenues of redress and correction are sealed or removed. Is this not high treason against the people and Constitution of the United States? Can It possibly be anything but?

(1) ref: Murdock vs. Pennsylvania, 1943

Go Back

 

 


Ministry of "Truth" - Central Intelligence Agency


The Central Intelligence Agency was created by the Rothschilds, not to discover facts of importance to national security, but to manufacture and disseminate ideologies and disinformation which serve Rothschild interests, and to create evidence to support that ideology, such as by planting Soviet weapons caches, or coercing newspapers into covering up damaging information, or even manufacture stories to support the Rothschild ideology.

The Patty Hearst kidnapping was engineered by the CIA, because Randolf Hearst threatened to expose sensitive information.

 

An LA Times reporter uncovered considerable evidence in this regard, including the fact that Donald DeFreez, the ringleader, had been arrested two weeks prior to the kidnapping. He had been wandering around in the middle of the night, with a tommygun, in the neighborhood where the kidnapping was to later take place.

 

The police let him go when they learned he was a CIA operative, and the gun a CIA issue. The aforementioned reporter had been unable to publish her report in any major daily, finally turning to the "Berkeley Barb". The article was totally atypical of Barb articles, in language, length, attention to detail, and style. It was also the very last issue of the Barb I would ever see.

The VietNam War was created by the CIA. Ho Chi Mhin had been a US ally during World War II.

 

After the War, the French attempted to retake VietNam, but Ho Chi Mhin forced them out. The Red Chinese invaded VietNam from the north, but Ho Chi Mhin forced them out too. This threatened Rothschild interests in the development of Red China. The return of Ho Chi Mhin to south VietNam also threatened a sweet deal the CIA had with Diem for heroin, which the CIA smuggled into the U.S. at enormous profit.

The CIA planted weapons caches and spread the fiction that Ho Chi Mhin was a Red. Bobby Kennedy got wise to the scam, and shared his suspicions with Robert, who then refused to send arms. The CIA plotted to have him assassinated, so they could install a Rothschild patsy, Lyndon Johnson, in his place, who subsequently pulled us into a full-scale war, after promising not to. When Robert Kennedy ran for president, they had him killed too, so he couldnít straighten things out.

The DEA was set up partly to protect the CIA drug monopoly, partly because drugs have a way of jogging peopleís minds, facilitating paradigm shifts, waking them up to what is going on around them. Some, like marijuana and LSD, are very good at this. I think it was Jerry Rubin who once called marijuana a "truth serum".

DEA funds have even been used to turn a trail in VietNam, where drugs were once carried on mule back, into a major superhighway, so drugs can now be carried out by truckload.

The DEA has also repeatedly undermined efforts of their own agents, frequently endangering them, to protect sources of cocaine in Colombia and Bolivia, and to protect the biggest dealer around, their boss, the CIA.

The War on Drugs was instigated, not to curtail drug use and traffic, but as a cover for gradually taking away our Constitutional Rights. A seizure rule intended to be used against racketeers has been turned into the incentive of The Inquisition: The Grand Inquisitors kept half of all the worldly goods of those accused of witchcraft.

 

The other half went to the papacy. Police departments may take ALL of the goods of those accused of drug traffic, before due process, leaving their victims destitute and without resources to fight back. This makes it particularly easy for police to get away with planting evidence.

 

You didnít really think they would only do that to O.J., did you?

 

Even Mark Furmannís confession has not rendered police less than blameless before the courts, allowing them to plant anything with impunity, under the noses of their victims.


Go Back to Contents

 

Go Back to CIA - The Central Intelligence Agency