and Church Leaders have known since the beginning of
Christianity that it was synthesized by the Roman
Piso family for the purpose of maintaining
control over the masses and to placate slaves.
is why we Jews are the “Chosen People” and why we have
endured so much for so many years; we are witnesses to
the lie. Our ancestors wrote what they could about this
in our texts.”
THE NEW TESTAMENT?
The authorship of the New Testament books have been discovered. For
years, the book “The True Authorship of the New Testament” has been
out and many persons have been discovering this as well.
Now, we feel that it is time to put this information out on the Net.
There has been a few
WebPages on the Net telling about how and why the Roman Piso family
authored the New
Testament. But there had yet to be the information on who wrote each
of the New Testament
books. So, here you will find out who wrote what. There is enough
information here so that
persons can grasp the fact that this is real and that they can
research it further as well as find books that will help to explain
this in more detail.
Soon, there will be new books out that will enable even the person
to do their own research
on this and to verify it. Our goal in all of this is to get this out
to as many persons as
possible and to see more and more persons writing on this subject.
Look for books on the
subject of: ‘The Piso Theory’, and of ‘The New Classical
We have determined that the book of Mark was the first of the
Gospels to have been written and so we will always list Mark before
THE NT BOOKS:
The gospel of Mark was written in a
prototype form before it was later crafted into the form that we
are familiar with. The earlier version was called ‘Ur Marcus’
and is also known/called ‘Q’ (for ‘Quelle’, which is German for
Our latest findings regarding the
early version of Mark show that this was written at about the
time of Claudius Caesar, by the grandfather of Arrius Piso. That
version was apparently only a bare sketch and most likely did
not give a name to the ‘messiah’. That appears to have been done
later by the person who actually played ‘Jesus’ in the Gospels -
The version that we are familiar with was written about the year
73 CE by Arrius Calpurnius Piso. Arrius Piso was a Roman on his
father’s side, but a descendant of King Herod on his mother’s
side and therefore he knew well about the Jewish religion. He
was also a close relative to the Flavians and even though
secretly he could inherit and use the Flavian name by his
mother’s descent from them, he gave a story about receiving it
from the emperor Vespasian (in his other identity as Flavius
Matthew too, was authored by Arrius
Calpurnius Piso. This was written about the year 75 CE.
Was written 85-90 CE by Arrius C.
Piso and Pliny the Younger.
The 4th Gospel, or the
Gospel of John was written by Justus Calpurnius Piso, a son of
Arrius C. Piso. This son was very much like this father in his
hatred towards humanity. This Gospel was written circa 105 CE.
The Acts of the Apostles was written
by Arrius Piso and his son Justus, with some help from
Younger 96-100 CE. By the way, there is a portion of Acts that
is missing from most English translations/interpretations. That
is the 29th Chapter, which has 10 verses.
The epistle to the Romans was
written by another son of Arrius Piso (Proculus Piso) and
Claudia Phoebe about the year 100. Claudia Phoebe is known in
history as the wife of the emperor Trajan (as Pompeia Plotina).
She wrote the last few verses of this epistle, which many copies
of the NT in English leave out because that portion was written
by a woman. This is obvious, and she even gives her name as
‘Phoebe’. You can tell where the previous male author leaves off
and the female author begins because the male author “signs off”
with ‘Amen’. She wrote the last verses (25-27) of Romans,
GALATIONS, and EPHESIANS:
were all written between 100-103 CE
by Pliny the Younger.
2nd CORINTHIANS and
were written by Justus C. Piso
between 103-105 CE.
was written by Justus C. Piso and
his son Julianus (Julianus was the father of the emperor
Aurelius, but this is seen in history only by his use of another
was written by Pliny the Younger
circa 105 CE.
was written by Justus C. Piso (also
known in history by other names), c. 107 CE.
1st and 2nd
were written by Justus C. Piso and
his son Julianus with some help from his nephew Silanus between
the years 105-110 CE.
was written by Pliny the Younger
circa 103-105 CE.
was written by Justus C. Piso and
his son Julianus.
was written by Justus C. Piso around
1st and 2nd
were written by Proculus Piso
between 110-115 CE.
and 3rd JOHN:
were written by Julius Calpurnius
Piso (who was still another son of Arrius Calpurnius Piso),
between 110-115 CE.
was written by Julius C. Piso also,
between the years 110-115 CE.
THE REVELATION OF JOHN THE
was written by Julius Calpurnius
Piso, who may have been the son of the other Julius Calpurnius
Piso (who had the same name), and this was written in or about
the year 137 CE. It was not the book of the NT, just written as
the end of the story.
This was written by a grandson of
Arrius Piso named Flavius Arrianus circa 140 CE. Flavius
Arrianus was the real name of the historian who wrote as ‘Appian’.
This person was the half-brother of the emperor Antoninus Pius.
Antoninus Pius, by the way, also wrote history under the name of
Suetonius. Flavius Arrianus also wrote other works, most
notably, he wrote under the name of ‘Ptolemy’.
The True Authorship of the New Testament
by Abelard Reuchlin
“The New Testament,
the Church, and
Christianity, were all the creation of the Calpurnius Piso
(pronounced Peso w/ long “E”) family
(a), who were Roman
aristocrats. The New Testament and
all the characters in it—Jesus, all the Josephs, all the Marys,
all the disciples, apostles, Paul, and
John the Baptist—are all
“The Pisos created the story and the characters; they tied the
story into a specific time and place in
history; and they connected it with some peripheral actual
people, such as the Herods, Gamaliel, the
Roman procurators, etc. But Jesus and everyone involved with him
were created (that is, fictional!)
“In the middle of the first century of our present era, Rome’s
aristocracy felt itself confronted with a
growing problem. The Jewish religion was continuing to grow in
numbers, adding ever more
proselytes. Jews numbered more than 8,000,000, and were 10% of
the population of the empire
and 20% of that portion living east of Rome.
half or more of the Jews lived
outside Palestine, of which many were descended from proselytes,
male and female.” (c)
“However, Judaism’s ethics and morality were incompatible with
the hallowed Roman institution of
slavery on which the aristocracy fed, lived and ruled. They
feared that Judaism would become the
chief religion of the empire. The Roman author,
tutor and confidant of Emperor
Nero, suggested in a letter to his friend Lucilius (a pseudonym
of Lucius Piso) that lighting candles
on Sabbaths be prohibited.
Seneca is later quoted by St. Augustine in his City of God
(although the quotation does not exist in Seneca’s extant
writings) as charging that:
customs of that most accursed nation have gained such strength
that they have been now received in
all lands, the conquered have given laws to the conqueror.””
“The family headed by Seneca’s friend,
Lucius Piso, was
confronted with an allied problem more
personal to it. They were the
Calpurnius Pisos, who were
descended from statesmen and consuls,
and from great poets and historians as well. Gaius and Lucius
Calpurnius Piso, leaders of the family,
had both married Arria the Younger (from her grandfather’s name, Aristobulus). This made Gaius
and Lucius Piso’s wife the great-granddaughter of Herod the
“Repeatedly, religious-minded Judaean zealots were staging
insurrections against the Herodian rulers
of Judaea who were
Piso’s wife’s relations. Piso wished to
strengthen his wife’s family’s control of
the Judaeans. The Pisos searched for a solution to the two
problems. They found it in the Jewish
holy books, which were the foundation both for the rapid spread
of the religion and for the zealot’s
refusal to be governed by Rome’s puppets.
The Pisos mocked, but
marveled at, the Jewish belief in
their holy books. Therefore, they felt a
new “Jewish” book would
be the ideal method to pacify the
Judaeans and strengthen their in-laws’ control of the country.”
“About the year, 60 A.D. (C.E.),
Lucius Calpurnius Piso composed
Ur Marcus, the first version of
the Gospel of Mark, which no longer exists. He was encouraged by
his friend Seneca (f)
assisted by his wife’s kinsman, young Persius the Poet. Nero’s
mistress (later his wife) Poppea was
pro-Jewish, and Nero opposed the plan. The result was the
Pisonian conspiracy to assassinate
Nero, detailed in the historian
Tacitus. But this attempt failed
when he aborted the plot. Instead,
Nero had Piso and Seneca and their fellow conspirators executed
by forcing them to commit
“He exiled Piso’s young son Arrius (spelled “Arius” herein), who
appears in Tacitus under several
names, including “Antonius Natalis.”
(g) Nero sent young Piso to Syria as
governor. That post also
gave him command of the legions controlling Judaea. His own
“history” records his service in Judaea
in the year 65 under the name of Gessius Florus, and in 66 with
the pseudonym Cestius Gallus.”
“This Arius Calpurnius Piso deliberately provoked the Jewish
revolt in 66 so he could destroy the
Temple in Jerusalem (h)--for
the Jews were unwilling to accept his father’s story and thereby
become pacified by it as it was intended. However, his 12th
legion was caught by the zealots in the
Pass of Beth Horon and almost lost. Nero’s reaction was to exile
him instead to Pannonia, to
command a legion there; and to send
Licinius Mucianus to serve
in Syria, and Vespasian to Judaea
to put down the Jewish revolt.”
“Then in 68 Nero was assassinated by his own slave Epaphroditus
(i) --who unknown
to his master
was young Piso’s lackey. Galba became emperor and named Piso’s
cousin, Licinianus Piso, (j)
his intended successor; but Galba in turn was soon overthrown by
Otho. Otho was then overthrown
by Vitellius, at which point Piso and his friends began to flock
together against the latter. The Pisos,
Mucianus, and Tiberius Alexander all joined ranks behind
Vespasian to seek to overthrow Vitellius.
(k) The were
joined by Frontinus and Agricola.”
“Arius Calpurnius Piso was still commanding the 7th legion in Pannonia
Vespasian sent him
(now appearing in Tacitus with the name Marcus Antonius Primus
across the Alps to overthrow Vitellius. Meanwhile, the main body
of Vespasian’s legions marched
overland under Mucianus from the east towards Rome.
succeeded in defeating Vitellius’ army
and secured Rome for Vespasian.(o)
Mucianus arrived and promptly sent him to Judaea to help
Titus at the siege of Jerusalem. He did so, and in 70 they
assaulted the city, then the Temple, burned
it, slaughtered many thousands, sent thousands more to slavery
and gladiatorial combat and death.”
“Then, Arius Calpurnius Piso wrote, in sequence, the following:
Gospel of Matthew (70-75 C.E.)
Present Gospel of Mark (75-80 C.E.)
Gospel of Luke (85-90 C.E.,
with help of Pliny the
In the gospel story he inserted himself by playing the
role of not only Jesus, but of all the
Josephs, as well. He particularly enjoyed assuming the identity
of Joseph. Wishing to create a
Jewish hero, a savior, in fictional form, he (and his father
before him), felt the identity of a second
Joseph secretly, but very aptly, fit them. For their name
had the same four letters, rearranged,
as the four Hebrew letters (Yud
Vov Samech Fey) which in that
language spelled the name Joseph.
Thus they saw themselves as
the new Joseph. That is why so much
of the story of Joseph in Egypt is
secretly redone and inserted into the
gospel story of Jesus.”
The vowels are pronounced as in
“veto” and “me so”.
Klausner, Joseph, From Jesus to
Paul, Macmillan Co., 1943, pp 33-34.
Baron, Salo, A Social and Religious
History of the Jews, Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y., and Jewish
Publication Society, Philidephia, 1952, vol. 1, pp 170-171.
Seneca, Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, Vol. III, Epistle XCV.47,
St. Augustine, City of God, Modern
Library, Random House, 1950, 6.11, p 202.
Seneca, Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, Vol. I, Epistle XLVI, pp
Tacitus, Annals, XV.54,71.
Having destroyed the Temple, Piso
could then have Jesus (whom he was predating to 40 years before
the Temple’s destruction) prophecy the destruction because of
the Jews’ rejection of him! (Mat. 23.37-38).
Roman historians (Suet. Nero 49, and
Dio Cassius 63.29) explain merely that Epaphroditus assisted the
emperor’s suicide. See also Tacitus, Annals XV.55, footnote 2.
Tacitus, Histories I.14.
Tacitus, Histories II.74-81.
Tacitus, Histories III.2, footnote
(Tacitus) Vespasian relied on Piso
because he was grandson of his own brother—Vespasian’s brother,
T. Flavius Sabinus, had married Arria Sr., who was Piso’s
maternal grandmother. Piso’s identity as thus also a Flavian is
decipherable from the appearance in the Flavian family line of
L. Caesennius Paetus (Townend, Gavin, Some Flavian Connections,
Journal of Roman Studies LI.54,62, 1961). That was an alias
(like Thrasea Paetus) of Piso’s father, L. Calpurnius Piso.
See page 20 supra, wherein Piso
himself also is mentioned as a Caesennius Paetus. That is the
true reason Piso used the literary pseudonym of Flavius; it was
not because of his alleged-but untrue and hardly
necessary-adoption by Emperor Flavius Vespasian. He was in fact
Piso humorously used the three basic consonants of the Flavians’
Sabinus name, SBN, in revised sequences for some of his
fictional literary identities:
(1) BarNaBaS who appears
in Acts 4.36 and there specifically stated as another name
of a Joseph (Josephus!)
(2) BarNaBazoS in Antiq.
(3) BaNnoS in Vita 11,
the mirror-image of John the Baptist.
The same device of rearranging
consonants was used in recreating Afranius Burrus, the friend of
Seneca (Tacitus, Annals XIII-XIV)-and therefore of Lucius Piso.
He was Nero’s Praetorian Prefect, and then several years before
Seneca’s death, was himself a victim of the emperor. Burrus
reappears as BaRaBbaS, the fictional brigand in Mat. 27.16.
(Tacitus, Histories III.6). The
realization that Marcus Antonius Primus was a pseudonym of Arius
Calpurnius Piso is based on these factors:
1. The name in Pliny’s
letters under which Piso is the latter’s wife’s grandfather
is Arius Antoninus.
2. According to Suetonius
(Lives of the Caesars, Book IV. XXV), Emperor Caius Caligula
appropriated Gaius Piso’s wife at Piso’s marriage. That
would have been about the year 36--the year before Arius’
birth. Caligula is known to have been a descendant of Mark
Antony (Marcus Antonius). Seemingly Suetonius was teasing at
the questioned paternity of Piso’s alter ego creation.
3. Tacitus’ caustic
description of Marcus Antonius Primus remind one of Piso.
4. The idea to call Piso
“Antonius Primus”—was his own. It was Piso himself in his
Jewish War IV.495 who first detailed Antonius Primus’
campaign for Vespasian against Vitellius. Also Josephus
inserts “Antonius” (himself!) as a centurion who dies at the
capture of Jotapata (Jewish War III.333).
5. Marcus Antonius
Primus’ colleague in the campaign against Vitellius is named
Arrius Varus (Tacitus, Histories III.6). This is yet another
alter ego of Piso himself. In the mid-50’s (C.E.), while in
his late teens, young Piso was a prefect of a cohort of
legionnaires in the campaign against Vologeses, King of
Armenia—serving there (in Tacitus, Annals XIII.9) under the
name of Arrius Varus.
6. His exploits as
General Marcus Antonius Primus account for his absence from
Judaea in the years 67-69, between his defeat as Cestius
Gallus and his reappearing to assist Titus as the siege of
Jerusalem in 70. Rather than being Vespasian’s prisoner in
chains, he was his general, advancing on Rome in his behalf.
Tacitus, Histories, III.82-86. Also
“the supreme authority was exercised by Antonius Primus” (Tacitus,