|
by Philip Jones May-June 2009 from Rense Website
Part 1
The saying goes thus:
...and that is precisely what has been done to our societies here in the West.
How does one sever a people's roots? First
you destroy its memory of itself through rewritten history, then you
depopulate it.
Two days ago on May 26th, the Times Online published a report entitled "Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation. America's richest people meet to discuss ways of tackling a 'disastrous' environmental, social and industrial threat".
The article went on to say that,
Many of you reading this will be familiar with the term 'Depopulation Agenda.'
I had already begun composing this article when the above story hit the headlines, which makes what I am about to write all the more relevant and necessary. There is a wealth of information out there on this subject, and here in this article I can only begin to 'scratch the surface' of what is a deeply involved and complex aspect of the plan for a 'New World Order.'
In this and the essays which follow, I shall
attempt to put the pieces of the puzzle together, join the dots if you will,
and illustrate how many diverse and seemingly unconnected factors are in
fact interlinked, and are being used by a nefarious cabal of Luciferians, of
which the above named 'Philanthropists' are most certainly members, in order
to cull a large percentage of the global population.
The question begs to be asked, why are Western women having fewer children than their mothers or often now none at all? Women in the West have had access to contraception for many decades, and also to legal abortion for over thirty years, but unlike Chinese women, they have the choice. No law compels them to abort their unborn offspring.
Yet these women are terminating their
pregnancies at a rate which Senator Patrick James Buchanan, in his book,
'The Death Of The West,' rightly terms 'Autogenocide.'
As I have written above, in this and the
following articles I will attempt to prove my assertions that there is a
deliberate culling of the global population underway, and that a Cabal of
Luciferians known as
the Illuminati is responsible for the deaths of
millions upon millions of innocents, and for the wreckage that we term human
civilization.
The 'Old World' is dying. Its nations have seemingly 'given up the ghost' and ceased reproducing.
Now, in this first decade of the 21st Century,
the traditional genetic makeup of the populations in Europe, America,
Australia, Canada and New Zealand have stopped growing and are in steep
decline. In Denmark, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic,
Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Russia, there are now more burials than
births.
The forecast is not pretty either. In 'The Death Of The West,' we read that between now and mid-century, the world population will grow to over 9 billion people, but this 50% increase will come entirely from Asia, Africa and South America while, at the same time, 100 million people of European Stock will vanish unreplaced.
Put another way, as the West declines, the
population in the developing world adds 100 million people every fifteen
months. That's like forty more Mexicos by 2050, while in Europe
alone, the equivalent of Denmark, Belgium, Holland, Sweden, Norway and
Germany will have ceased to exist.
As Sen. Buchanan writes,
The Western nations and Europe in particular are facing a stark and unpleasant mathematical reality.
If we accept that the likelihood of Western women developing a desire to have large families is zero, and we wish to maintain the current ratio of around 4.8 workers for every senior citizen, then the choice lies between ever higher taxation, or massive immigration from the developing world on a culturally destructive scale.
Either option will change the way we and our
children (if we have any) live in perpetuity.
For decades now, demographers have been warning
of an impending demographic disaster in the 'developed world,' but there
haven't been too many ready to listen. Western governments, even though
fully aware of the catastrophe approaching their nations, have either hidden
the facts from their people, or downplayed the forecasts as being
exaggerated or even erroneous. But we have now reached that point in time
where the mathematics speak for themselves.
Many here in the West reading this will perhaps breathe a sigh of relief and look forward to a time without overcrowded cities and traffic jams.
They will reason that since they do not live in the Third World but in Europe, North America, Australia etc. that the issue does not concern them.
But it does, and the former UN Population Division director Joseph Chamie outlined why in graphic detail when the 2001 report was first published:
The European Commission joined in with its own 'doomsday' statement when it appealed for an end to the 'fortress Europe' policy and encouraged Europeans to embrace racial pluralism and admit a controlled flow of legal immigrants each year.
The German Institute of Economic Research has
warned Germans that the country will have to accept a major increase in
immigration if it hopes to avoid a crippling long-term labor shortage. It
said that net immigration would soon have to be pegged at more than 600,000
annually.
The public and social institutions of the Western world, now firmly controlled by the architects of "equality," began a campaign of social engineering that laid waste to the cultural awareness of Europeans and their cousins abroad. In this new campaign, there was no neutral territory. Nothing escaped its merciless 'scorched earth' policy.
No aspect of our history, culture, or science
was left untouched, or not twisted and turned inside out by the proponents
of "democracy, liberalism, and equality."
Bombarded with Cultural Marxist Neo-Communist ideas, pseudo-psychology (based on the Kabbalah), Eastern New Age spirituality and adolescent idealism, a generation of Western youth rebelled against the "establishment" and joined ranks with the enemies of our people - all supposedly in the cause of "democracy, liberalism, and equality."
The impact of this 'movement', which rejected
virtually all our Christian values, on the Western world cannot be
overemphasized.
It is the descendants of this generation who having seized all the major positions of social influence, have knowingly and willingly directed and controlled the Auto genocide being perpetrated against their own people.
One of the primary tenets of Marxism is the eradication of the nuclear family, and it is no coincidence that a major thrust of the 'sixties cultural revolution' was directed against the family, the very soul of nations and communities.
Subsequently, all aspects of that traditional and most natural core of the human condition have been attacked and vilified throughout all avenues of education and information. Can anyone remember the last time they saw a film which extolled marriage and family values? Make no mistake here, all the ridicule, derision and hatred directed towards matrimony and child-rearing was and is a major part in the play called 'The Depopulation Agenda'.
It is irrefutable that our present sorry condition in which women reject motherhood, children often know only one parent, and only homosexuals it seems are attracted by marriage, was carefully prepared by the engineers who planned and plotted their long-term strategy for the culling of our population.
Destroy the nucleus of society, and society will
fall apart.
They told us that after centuries of imperialism and colonialism by European powers, the non-White peoples have accumulated so many grievances that we supposedly have a "moral obligation" for turning over vast proportions of our wealth to them by means of foreign aid.
The reasoning is that our high standard of living only came into being due to the "manifold crimes" our ancestors allegedly perpetrated against the rest of mankind. The paradox to this is that without an ever increasing influx of immigrant labour into our countries, due to the calamitous drop in the birth rate here in the West, our bloated welfare systems will all but collapse in the near future.
Unless we experience some form of miraculous
turnaround and soon, the only way by which our taken for granted high
standard of living can be sustained is by the contributions of immigrants
from the Third World.
Many in the West have grave misgivings regarding what amounts to a human tidal wave crashing upon our shores. Yet our politicians seem totally impotent, or even negligent in finding a solution and persist in what they tell us to believe is the only recourse available to them: Mass Immigration.
Any questioning, request for open debate or opposition to this "reasoning" is summarily dismissed and denounced as "racism and bigotry."
Several European countries, plus Canada, have
even penalized the public expression of disagreement to "diversity" - just
like Jean Raspail predicted in his 1973 novel
The Camp of the Saints.
If we accept that the thesis of 'Natural Selection' provides for the survival of those who struggle for it, not for those who take it for granted.
That immigrants seize the opportunities provided to them is both reasonable and understandable. The evil lies not with those coming here to seek a better life, but with those eternal adversaries of humankind, the Luciferian Illuminists, who have planned, orchestrated and also seemingly conditioned the European race into mild acceptance of it's own its extinction.
They, the schemers and movers behind the scenes, have declared war on us, as we in the West were seen as the biggest obstacle to their plans.
In her 1979 pamphlet, 'A World Coup Is Planned,' Dr. Kitty Little writes:
It is the Illuminists, in utter thrall as they are to their 'Dark Lord,' who have plotted the demise of Western man.
After two fratricidal wars that pitched European nation against European nation, both instruments in their own way of driving humanity towards world government, they then turned on the civil populations of the west by manipulating the decline in birthrates.
They achieved their goals within the space of
barely half a century, using a multitude of means (to be dealt with more
fully later), thereby creating the situation where it is now necessary for
the nations of the West to import huge numbers of immigrants in order to
maintain the greatest means of ensuring human dependency ever invented: the
Welfare State!
The great majority of immigrants who arrive at the borders of the West do so looking for a better life for themselves and their families.
But there are among them a small minority of politically motivated stooges, mesmerized by carefully crafted stories at home of past colonial oppression, all carefully calculated to instill as much resentment as possible, creating a form of "reverse colonialism." They do not come looking for "democratic freedoms" -- they come for plunder and pillage (in a manner of speaking).
The First World is attractive to the Third World for one reason only: our out of control materialism and consumerism.
Our
middle-class standard of living appears, to such people, a luxurious
lifestyle they can only dream of, and they reason: why shouldn't they get a
'piece of the pie' too?
Harvard economist George Borjas writes that,
The net effect, he says, is that we are currently "importing poverty."
With the economic and social conditions in the
Third World deteriorating ever more, and
the United Nations calling on the
Western countries to open their borders, immigration into the First World
will become an avalanche in the future and will wreak havoc on our economic
and social conditions.
European civilization is the engine of progress in the world. With our civilization gone, the Malthusian principle will most assuredly catch up with the rest of mankind.
"Diversity" means the death of the West, but
this death will not be limited to us. At least this much can be predicted.
The only social construct that protects and nurtures human beings is the nuclear family unit and thereafter, that of the extended family, whereby children learn from not only their parents, but their grandparents, aunties and uncles also. The passing down of knowledge and tradition in this way kept people grounded and gave a sense of natural belonging and security. This is the divine God-given order of the world.
The violators of this order are enemies of
mankind who not only want the European race to perish, but want every
indigenous population on earth to perish along with it.
This article is about how the Illuminati, through a multitude of means and 'methods' are engaged in a war against the rest of mankind. It is a war unlike any other in human history insomuch as it is being conducted without one of the sides in the conflict knowing about it.
One of the major objectives in this war is the
culling of the population, some say by as much as 80%. In this series of
articles, I will attempt to show how it is being done, and why.
The US birthrate has been cut from 4 down to 2 children per woman, the European and Canadian is 1.5. (We need 2.2 just for replacement.) Russia will see its population plummet from 145 million to 115 million by 2015, and all the other Western nations face the same threat to their posterity.
The West is looking down the barrel of a demographic catastrophe which has no precedent in human history, inasmuch as its population is seemingly opting for its own extinction, by its pursuit of a humanistic, hedonistic and sex- obsessed materialistic lifestyle, based on the insidious machinations of Masonic Luciferianism.
In this, the second part of 'To Kill A Tree,' we will look at how the 'Power' has used the women's movement to further its agenda, and how, in doing so, it has debased the feminine, alienated women from men, been instrumental in the collapse of the family, and been a major cause in the plummeting birth rate here in the West.
We will look at the effects of contraception and
abortion, and then, in the next in the series, examine how, on a global
scale, women have been the victims of an all-out assault on their persons,
via the use of propaganda, pharmaceuticals and other science-based methods
which have brought them, mostly unwittingly, into the very eye of the
Depopulation Agenda storm.
Feminism and feminists have played a front-line role in the Illuminati's war against humankind. I think I must have been around twenty-three years of age and fresh out of the military when I began to realize that Feminism had very little to do with women's rights.
Instead, it appeared to me, even back then, to have more to do with population control. One of the most obvious results of societies adopting feminist ideals is a decline in the birthrate. In 1990 author Katerina Runske wrote a book entitled 'Empty Hearts and Empty Homes, <Feminism v. Mankind>', in which she addressed the inevitable result of the feminist's anti-male anti-marriage rhetoric, along with a damning indictment on abortion:
With the advent of the welfare state and the promise of a 'cradle to grave' social security net, children were no longer regarded as a necessary insurance against want and need in old age.
If women earned enough to to gain financial independence, then marriage was no longer essential. And, with contraception made freely available, along with the ever-present backup of abortion waiting in the wings, the modern feminist could behave as immorally as she wished, have as much sex as she wanted, and avoid all those unnecessary complications of being a wife and mother.
By 'liberating' women and consequently men of
the burden of family, the 'Illuminists' have in essence made the family
redundant. Families as we knew them have begun to disappear and when they
go, our civilization goes with them.
In the sixties, something fundamental occurred which altered the way women viewed their lives and degraded in them the desire to be wives and mothers.
That something was 'Second Wave Feminism' inspired by the likes of Communists Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, along with the editor of 'Cosmopolitan' magazine, Helen Gurley Brown and Britain's Germaine Greer, all coordinated by the CIA and provably bought and paid for by the Rockerfeller Foundation (see Henry Makow's Book 'The Cruel Hoax').
With a new generation hitting the university
campuses, these Marxist demagogues in disguise had a fresh and naive crop of
young women to mold and manipulate. All restraint seemed to collapse, and a
'new' unbiblical gauge for measuring morality appeared in order to justify
the explosion in promiscuity and immorality.
Rather than fulfill their divinely appointed
mission as wives and mothers, both loved and cherished by their husbands and
children, women today have been guided into turning their backs on all that
was once considered rich and rewarding in exchange for pandering themselves
to the 'gods' of the marketplace.
It is no coincidence that global capitalism
today views women as units of production, liberated from husbands, family
and home in exactly the same terms as did the two fathers of Communism.
Contrary to what the 'High Priestesses' of Feminism have been propagating for decades, their ideology has not liberated women. It has enslaved them completely.
The role of the modern career woman appears to me more akin to that of a 'serf,' a 'bondwoman,' tied to the state through her taxes, and to her employer through her labour. Somewhere in between, if married, she juggles her remaining 'freedoms' between her often neglected husband and her children, parents, and what friends and leisure pursuits she has time for. True freedom is about having control over one's life; the freedom to pursue personal fulfillment through love, joy, creativity and a sense of familial duty.
Slaves are there to work! Mothers are free and
nurturing souls.
They can have it all, they are told. But it's a
marketplace illusion. Many are in reality destroying any chance they may
have of finding true happiness through love, marriage and family, by their
casual and often promiscuous sexual behavior and their disrespect for
themselves and their bodies.
Most seem to accept their newfound
socio-political impotence, and due to an uncertainty of what their role in
the great scheme of things is, content themselves with a life of hedonistic
irresponsibility. Those who are politically conscious, and there aren't that
many, lay the full blame for their emasculation on women, and they hate them
for it.. This does not a fruitful generation make.
Few if any young women today place a very high priority on being wives and mothers.
For years before I had any knowledge of the 'Depopulation Agenda,' I had been able to equate the decline in the birth rates here in the West with the so-called 'women's movement.' Now I see it for what it truly is: A form of 'Final Solution' to what the Illuminati term 'the population problem.'
But for the moment, let us continue to unravel
the Feminist 'ball of string.'
As the article on the examiner.com site, that inspired this series maintains, there are now annually 46 million abortions carried out worldwide.
For those Danish readers out there, that's the equivalent of 9.2 Denmark's being killed each year. This makes abortion by far the most common and oft performed surgical procedure in modern medicine. It was in 1973 that the landmark case known in US legal history as Roe v Wade opened the floodgates that have lead us to this most deplorable situation, where innocent human life is regarded as disposable.
I do not argue that there are circumstances
where abortion may be the only humane recourse, such as in rape cases where
the victim falls pregnant. But we have now reached the point where abortion
is considered a 'failsafe' or a backup to the 'Pill' and, what's more, it is
being encouraged and used as a major weapon in the global war against
populations, causing the wholesale slaughter of the most vulnerable members
of our species.
Thankfully, when I was born in 1958, in what was
regarded back then as a state of illegitimacy, abortion was still regarded
not only as a crime, but as a gross act of immorality, otherwise you might
not be reading this article. Yet fifteen years later, the US Supreme Court
ruling which declared abortion a constitutional right was extolled as a
landmark in social progress.
To deny our God-given nature, to turn our
back on all that is moral and decent is a slippery slope towards oblivion.
Recently I read an emotive story in a British newspaper which caused a very disturbed reaction within me, as it told of a fifteen-year-old girl who had an abortion. The poignant handwritten diary entry in its childish, rounded letters says it all:
Then in brackets underneath: "[killed my baby]."
Through these few words, one can only guess at the turmoil in the mind of this young girl as she struggled to come to terms with what she had done.
After noting the event in the impersonal jargon
used by the professionals who handled her case, she revealed in simple terms
how it actually felt to her. Not a 'termination,' but the killing of her
baby. Tragic as this was, the really appalling thing was her isolation from
her parents. In need of parental guidance and support more than at any time
in her life, she had been effectively abandoned to make this decision and
cope with its aftermath on her own.
What have we come to when a girl barely out of
childhood herself can have an abortion, a procedure with huge physical,
emotional and moral ramifications, without the advice and care of her
parents, because they have been deliberately kept in ignorance of what is
happening?
An abortion is traumatic for any woman, let
alone a child. It is an event of great significance and difficulty,
requiring a balance to be struck between the needs of the mother and respect
for the early life she is carrying. When that mother is herself effectively
a child, it takes on a further dimension altogether.
The girl has since commented that if her mother
had been told, she might have kept the baby. I cannot help but wonder if
there is a conspiratorial aspect to this. Are doctors, when dealing with
such matters, aware that there is a hidden conspiracy at the very top to
encourage women to choose abortion, or under instruction to bear in mind
that if a patient's parents are fully involved in the process, there is more
likelihood of the unborn child being kept alive and any planned abortion
cancelled?
Yet when it came to an abortion, with its momentous physical and emotional consequences, she and the girl's father were deliberately kept out of the loop. They would have supported their daughter if she had decided to have the baby. But instead, says her mother, she herself was made to feel 'so useless' as a parent. And indeed, one of the worst aspects of this whole business is the undermining of parental responsibility.
Although they remain legally responsible for
their children's welfare, parents are seeing their rights taken away and
given to their children instead. This deliberately severs a child from her
parents by telling her, in effect, that she is now grown-up enough to do
without them.
In so doing, they replace parental values by their own belief system, and move us ever closer to Huxley's vision of a Brave New World.
How many ardent feminists, I wonder, will read the above and say,
Make no mistake about it, feminism is not about
'women's rights.' It is a war against God, nature, the family and men.
Identicality, not equality, is the goal, and they are more than halfway
there if present Western societies are the gauge by which success in this
war is to be measured.
Margaret Sanger, the Feminist 'birth mother' of Planned Parenthood and a virulent eugenicist, wrote before the second world war that " the most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is kill it." Sanger is an icon of Feminism, and was an open and vocal admirer of Hitler's eugenics program.
It is a recorded fact that the eugenics movement
was born in the US and in Great Britain, long before Hitler grabbed power in
Germany, and, following the end of the war, simply went home again in the
shape of the organization: Planned Parenthood. The above example of the chaos caused to a young life by the breakdown in the moral order should be reason enough for the reader to stop and look around his or her self and ask the question:
They say you can judge a tree by its fruit. I
think it fair to say that the fruits of our new 'humanist' lifestyle are
very poisonous.
Today, half of all marriages end in divorce, 'relationships' come and go and, to quote Pat Buchanan,
The collapse of marriage and marital fertility appears to be due to a long-term shift away from christianity and the values it affirms, towards a militant and secular individualism focused on the self. With promiscuity running amok, divorce the norm, the proliferation of pornography and tax payer-funded abortion on a massive scale, (barely considered newsworthy), the world predicted by Pope Paul VI in 1968 in his 'Humanae Vitae' is upon us.
In his encyclical, he envisioned four consequences of what he termed the 'contraceptive mindset':
I think it fair to say, as the sad example given above depicts very well, that the Pope's vision was close to prophetic. Our society seems to be progressively stripping out the human-ties of family and parents, trust and responsibility, authority and dependence, and replacing them with an impersonal bureaucracy that seeks to regulate, license and ultimately control human relationships and what they produce.
Throughout history, the surest defense against
state control of our personal lives has been the family unit. Slice by
slice, this is being dismembered and its roots are being severed.
We will also examine how the Illuminists and
their Marxist, humanist, socialist 'lackeys,' have worked towards breaking
down Western civilization and tradition, by the rewriting of history and the
defamation of national heroes.
In his book, 'Do We Need Mass Immigration,' the British author Anthony Browne writes:
Large scale immigration from the 'Third World'
is one of the key tools being used by the Illuminati in order to break down
resistance to their plans for a One World State.
Furthermore, they clearly believe, and the
evidence is supportive, that large scale immigration assists them in
achieving their defined goal of a Pan European Superstate, within which any
nationalism or patriotism would not only be frowned upon, but outlawed under
the auspices of xenophobia.
The UK for instance is not a multicultural society. A mere eight per cent of the population are from an ethnic minority, and even then a number of those are christians. Nor is it a country of immigrants. Until the 1950s, there had been no large-scale immigration since the Norman Conquest over a 1000 years before. The notion that the UK is a 'mongrel nation' is erroneous.
Britain is a country with a distinctive and
ancient identity and culture founded upon a dominant religion, Christianity,
to which most of its citizens still feel at least a nominal attachment.
Those who went to Britain early in the last century did so, because they valued and admired the country's national characteristics of fair play, tolerance, and emotional restraint. Without sacrificing their own culture, they adopted British values by learning about Shakespeare, Austen, the Bronte Sisters and Dickens, and by studying the history of parliamentary democracy and the growth of British institutions.
But the point I am making here is that these
things were actually taught. People were imbued with British values because
the British themselves were proud of their nation, identity and culture, and
they believed in transmitting what Britain stood for to all the nation's
citizens and their children.
The great works of English literature are
replaced by books considered to be more 'relevant' to a child's own cultural
and ethnic background. British political history has become 'persona non
grata,' so children are given no sense of any chronological national story
to make sense of the society they inhabit.
But in truth, at it's core, there lies a desire to create an entirely new kind of society by destroying the old one. That means, among other things, repudiating and denying openly and publicly, loudly and often, the Christian basis of British culture. Thus, in the UK, a recent report by the Institute for Public Policy Research on the teaching of religion in schools, concluded that there was a need to teach a 'diversity of identities' to equip children for life in a 'multicultural society'.
Accordingly, it directs teachers to encourage
children to question the faith they inherit from their families, and to
regard the moral teachings of religion with suspicion, if not outright
hostility. Under the cover of promoting 'diversity,' this is actually a menu
for subversion, explicitly aiming to undermine the family and the moral and
religious basis of the nation, severing children from parents and tradition.
Because it is embarrassed by its own culture,
Britain refuses to defend it in the same way other nations, like the Dutch
or the Danes, for example, have done with theirs. The Dutch have recently
expelled large numbers of failed asylum-seekers, and Denmark has severely
tightened it's policy on immigration, to the point where it struggles to
work within the confines of EU legislation.
But if their numbers are too numerous, or if
they don't wish to integrate, it then becomes impossible for the indigenous
culture to absorb them. If there simply aren't enough people who can
identify with the country's history, then it cannot be taught. And since any
nation is rooted in its history, the national identity unravels. Being
ashamed of our country's past, no longer becomes a question of any
relevance, as there is no longer a sense of any collective 'we'.
If there is only 'them,' people no longer
acknowledge the validity of the laws that bind them, and are no longer
prepared to make sacrifices or die for a country inhabited by people they
don't know or trust. The result is that democracy withers, and social
disintegration follows.
He says:
Following his considered and thoughtful discussion of an important issue of national significance, Mr Goodhart found himself in the 'gun sights' of no less a 'grandee,' than the chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, who labeled him a racist, and likened him to Enoch Powell and the British National Party.
It is sometimes difficult to grasp how on earth have we reached the point, where a clearly decent man is smeared a racist simply for wishing to preserve his national identity? Why is Britain so much less attached to its own culture and traditions than the Dutch and the Danes, who have achieved far less, or other Europeans like the French who have their own colonial history to contend with?
And why has education unraveled the culture in
Britain to an extent not seen elsewhere?
They had much less impact in Europe, where institutions remained robust enough to mount a solid defense, and language provided a bulwark against the 'new' ideas coming across the Atlantic from America. Schools still transmitted their traditional values, the family held up, and the churches were strong. In Britain, however, these institutions simply collapsed.
The welfare state, in promoting a culture of
rights, had eroded responsibility and duty and encouraged instead a culture
of narcissism. This created fertile ground for the cult of personal choice
promoted by the radicals.
In Britain, a State monopoly over schools and universities meant there was no challenge to these ideas, which aimed to disconnect citizens from the traditions and established values of the nation. When faced with this rout, the established church merely wrung its hands and screamed, "No Mas," then dutifully followed suit.
As a result, the three pillars of national
identity; family, education and church crumbled.
The idea that a people's principal duties are to family, community and nation is being challenged at every turn by a new vision in which people are expected to feel a form of 'global responsibility.' In this new trans-national order, the powers of individual nations are being progressively transferred to institutions that cross national boundaries.
The European Union, the United Nations, the
World Trade Organization and the proposed NAU will increasingly impose laws
and obligations on once proud sovereign nations where they are not
accountable to the people. Much of this energy is being provided by insider
human rights activists promoting 'international law,' which has no
democratic legitimacy but is increasingly being used to bring democracies to
heel. Bit by bit as the nation state is superseded, democracy is being
eroded. The ultimate goal, a One World State.
In the US, the 'war' rages between rival camps supporting either trans-nationalism or democracy. Amazingly, the British haven't even grasped there is a battle to be fought.
According to Philosopher Roger Scruton, the British are sleep walking into the likely to be European Federal State,
The outcome, he says, will be despotism and
anarchy.
White children, in the UK, it said,
In her article, 'Britains' Social Suicide,' the journalist Melanie Phillips writes:
To sever a people's roots, it is necessary to destroy it's memory.
By denying a people true knowledge of who they
are and where they came from, and those aspects of their history and
tradition which defines them as a separate identifiable nation, with a
common language, common faith and common mission, it is possible to create a
sense of hopelessness and futility, which in time will eventually kill the
collective psyche and love of country and enable that once distinct people
to be swallowed up by any would be Supranational state.
Developed by the Marxist 'thinkers' of the Frankfurt School, (see reference section) Critical Theory has been defined as the,
In practice, Critical Theory works like this:
Critical Theory does to nations what
'attack politics' does to opposing candidates in elections, only on a much
larger and more destructive scale. Pat Buchanan in his book, 'Death Of The
West,' calls it "The moral equivalent of vandalizing graves and desecrating
corpses."
In the UK, amongst many others, it was Nelson, Wellington and Churchill, whilst children in the US learned about the exploits of Columbus, Washington, and Jefferson. National holidays and public buildings were named after them. But those days are gone forever, or so it seems. State schools were once proud national institutions where our children were taught how to be good citizens, patriots even.
In his book, 'The Disuniting Of America,' Arthur Schlesinger writes:
Since the 1960's, christianity has been removed from the classroom.
The old books by the great writers are gone and
new more 'relevant' politically correct titles put in their place. The
stories of our national heroes are no longer taught in schools, and are
noticeably absent from schoolbooks, and have been largely forgotten, except
by those of fifty years and upwards who still remember different times.
Public buildings and holidays have been given new names, the achievements of
our forebears slandered, and our people made to feel embarrassed for a
supposedly evil and malevolent past.
In the 'Death of The West', Patrick Buchanan reviews how successful the agents of change have been in reshaping the way Americans view their country.
In the 1950's around 89% of American men and 94% of American women believed their country to be the finest on earth. In a poll conducted in 2000, only 58% of American men and 51% of American women felt that way.
I am well aware that my own countrymen and women
are in the main deeply demoralized by what is left of Tony Blair's
superficially manufactured 'Cool Britannia,' and across Europe, it seems
paradoxically, that it is only the Danes who espouse any sense of
satisfaction and contentment with their nation, and as I have written at
length previously, there is much more to that than meets the eye (see
reference section).
Journalists, grown men amongst them, wept with joy over his
acceptance speech. There's been nothing like it seen in the 'old country'
since Britain's former prime minister, Tony Blair was elected back in
1997.
Like Obama, Blair was seen as a savior figure,
who would lay his hands upon a tired and broken nation and bring healing
where there was discord. And like Obama, Blair also had an agenda of change,
which unknown to all but the conspiratorial 'inner sanctum,' was ready and
prepared for him come election day by his Illuminati puppet masters.
Throughout his term in office, he would follow an agenda to remake Britain according to the 'Illuminists' strategy, as outlined to him at the Bilderberg meeting which he had attended the year prior to his election. A strategy to guide Britain towards full absorption into the European Superstate and change forever the very nature of the British national character.
The public facade; the 'drama' to be played out
before the masses, was to create a more inclusive, kind and just society,
ostensibly by eradicating prejudice, reshaping the country in his own image,
whilst in reality, he worked tirelessly and treacherously towards the
ushering in of a
New World Order.
It tore up Britain's (unwritten) constitution,
devolved power to Scotland and Wales, and changed the composition of the the
House of Lords, thereby destroying the delicate equilibrium of the balance
of power.
Through it's adoption of human-rights
legislation, Britain has exchanged its historic concept of 'negative"
liberty,' that everything is permitted unless it is actively prohibited, for
the 'positive' European idea that only what is codified is to be permitted.
As a result, freedom has shrunk to what ideology permits.
That is because Britain's Fabian intelligentsia and political class has 'signed up' to 'transnational progressivism' which holds that the nation state is the source of all the ills in the world because it is inherently fascist and racist (for an in depth study of the source of this nonsense, read 'The Authoritarian Personality' by Theodore Adorno).
Obama believes America has its own sins to expiate, and Britain's treacherous internationalist political class likes the sound of that. It wants and needs America to be humbled.
The message they want to promulgate is that
nations cause wars, and that the sooner we get a
World Government, the
better!
But they find themselves politically impotent,
in part because the Conservative party will not accept or acknowledge that
British values are under attack. It should be said that true Conservative
Republicans, as opposed to the 'Neo Cons' in America should take careful
note of this in order to recognize a similar danger and dilemma facing them
following their defeat.
What they have failed to understand is that such
change has turned values such as right and wrong, good and bad on their
heads and has produced a sentimentalist, cruel, oppressive and perverse
society, one where burglars go unpunished, but householders are prosecuted
for putting the wrong kind of garbage in the trash can, and where people are
too frightened to protest at the erosion of British, Christian, or Western
values because of the inevitable and virulent verbal or written slander that
will follow.
The result has been that millions feel betrayed and abandoned by the absence of conservatism, and many now see the Conservative parties as nothing more, than a bunch of unprincipled opportunists. The challenge for conservatives on both sides of the pond and elsewhere, is to find a way of conserving the essential values of Western Civilization and then defend them against the onslaught being mounted against them both from within and from without.
Unless they take up the gauntlet which has been thrown down and soon, there will be nothing left to conserve.
Video
One of the most ominous events of modern history
is quietly unfolding. Social scientists and economists agree - we are headed
toward a demographic winter which threatens to have catastrophic social and
economic consequences. The effects will be severe and long lasting and are
already becoming manifest in much of Europe.
References
|
