Part 9

Mysterious Power-Downs in the World Trade Center
http://www.911mysteries.com

Did the World Trade Center towers undergo a deliberate "power-down" on the weekend prior to the 9-11 terrorist attacks? According to Scott Forbes, a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. -- a high-net investment bank which was later acquired by Franklin Templeton -- this is precisely what took place.

Forbes, who was hired by Fiduciary in 1999 and is now stationed at a U.K. branch office, was working on the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, and said that his company was given three weeks advance notice that New York's Port Authority would take out power in the South Tower from the 48th floor up.

The reason: the Port Authority was performing a cabling upgrade to increase the WTC's computer bandwidth. However, there seems to be no logical reason why the electricity need be shut down in order to upgrade computer bandwidth.

The Fiduciary Trust was one of the WTC's first occupants after it was erected, and a "power-down" had never been initiated prior to this occasion.

Forbes also stated that his company put forth a huge investment in time and resources to take down their computer systems due to the deliberate power outage.

This process, Forbes recalled, began early Saturday morning (September 8th) and continued until mid-Sunday afternoon (September 9th) -- approximately 30 hours.

As a result of having its electricity cut, the WTC's security cameras were rendered inoperative, as were its I.D. systems, and elevators to the upper floors.

Forbes states that there were plenty of engineers going in-and-out of the WTC who had free access throughout the building due to its security system being knocked out.

Even though these disclosures could jeopardize his current employment, Forbes has stepped forward because, "I have mailed this information to many people, including the 9/11 Commission, but no one seems to be registering these facts."
 

Part 10

The 9/11 Commission: See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil!

The Kean Commission (9/11 Commission) was created only after 14 months of pressure from September 11 victims' families, who for their efforts at first got the failed nomination by George Bush of Henry Kissinger as chairman.

He declined, but the Commission consisted of appointees with obvious conflicts of interest, and was seriously under-funded ($14 million as opposed to the $67 million devoted to investigating Clinton's stray member or $30 million for the space shuttle disaster).

Its work was met with resistance from the White House. Bush met with the Commission only on the condition that he be questioned in the Oval Office, jointly with Cheney, and off the record.

The 9/11 Commission Report was noteworthy in the fact that it didn't blame anyone for 9/11. Not one person has lost his job because 9/11 happened; even though high-ranking witness after high-ranking witness to the Commission described blunders and missed opportunities leading up the attacks. Why did the Commission do that? Many of the 9/11 widows are unhappy with the findings and many people have called it a whitewash.

Despite the vast quantity of labor behind it, the 9/11 Commission Report is a cheat and a fraud. It stands as a series of evasive maneuvers that infantilize the audience, transform candor into iniquity, and conceal realities that demand immediate inspection and confrontation.

Because it is continuously engaged in scotching all attempts to distinguish better from worse leadership responses, the Commission can't discharge its duty to educate the audience about the habits of mind and temperament essential in those chosen to discharge command responsibility during crises. It can't tell the truth about what was done and not done, thought and not thought, at crucial turning points.

The Commissioners' immeasurably valuable access to the principals involved offered an extraordinary opportunity to amass material precious to future historians: commentary based on moment-to-moment reaction to major events.

But the 567 pages, which purport to provide definitive interpretations of the reactions, are in fact useless to historians, because a seeming terror of bias transforms query after commissarial query--and silence after silence--into suggested new lines of self-justification for the interviewees.

In the course of blaming everybody a little, the Commission blames nobody--blurs the reasons for the actions and hesitations of successive administrations, masks choices that, fearlessly defined, might actually have vitalized our public political discourse.

The 9/11 Commission was a blatant whitewash, it failed to seriously examine virtually every fact supporting complicity of the US administration.

It ignored the PNAC document, the links between the CIA and Bin Laden, the links between the Bush family and Bin Laden, the links between the CIA and Mohammed Atta, the terror drill exercises that were taking place in the week of 9/11, the collapse of building 7, the molten steel found under the rubble of towers 1, 2 and 7, the evidence of the use of thermite and sulfur, the witness reports of repeated explosions throughout the towers, the lack of flying skills previously displayed by the alleged hijackers, Silverstein's $7 billion insurance payout, the insider trading before 9/11, the mysterious power-downs and evacuations at the WTC prior to 9/11, and the fact that the Bin Laden family were allowed to leave the US just after 9/11 while every US citizen was grounded. The list just goes on and on and on.

It is up to us, the people, to get some answers. Please write to your congressman to demand a proper INDEPENDENT investigation into 9/11.
 

Part 11

Who Benefited From 9/11?

When a crime has been committed, any good investigator will ask the question -- Who benefits? In this 9/11 Coincidences installment, we apply this same reasoning to the main parties associated with the events of 9/11.

I had to shorten this video in order to upload it to YouTube, so I edited lots of bits out.

The full video is 30 mins long and goes into more detail on each of the parties spoken about.

Part 12

Guilty Demeanor

This video takes a look at the guilty demeanor displayed by George W Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and others with regard to the events of 9/11.

If you were the president of the United States, and an attack on the scale of 9/11 took place on your watch, wouldn't you immediately do everything you could to ensure that there was a thorough investigation into what happened?

Wouldn't you make sure that the investigation was started up straight away, and that it was headed by independent people who left no stone unturned? Wouldn't you make sure that the investigation was given all the funding it needed?

We know that the Bush administration did everything in its power to derail an open inquiry into 9/11. Then, when faced with its inevitability, the president and his aides sought to limit its scope, its access, and its funding.

In addition, the odd behavior displayed by the White House with regard to 9/11, would surely make them prime suspects on anyone's list.