March 21, 2017
Steven Jones is a former full professor of physics at Brigham
Young University, his major research interests have been in the
areas of fusion, solar energy, and archaeometry.
He has authored or
co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of extremely
high temperatures during the WTC destruction and evidence of
unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust.
Robert Korol is a professor emeritus of civil engineering at
McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, as well as a fellow of the
Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the Engineering Institute
His major research
interests have been in the areas of structural mechanics and steel
More recently, he has
undertaken experimental research into the post-buckling resistance
of H-shaped steel columns and into the energy absorption associated
with pulverization of concrete floors.
Anthony Szamboti is a mechanical design engineer with over 25
years of structural design experience in the aerospace and
Since 2006, he has
authored or co-authored a number of technical papers on the WTC
high-rise failures that are published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies
and in the International Journal of Protective Structures.
Ted Walter is the director of strategy and development for
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth),
a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500
architects and engineers.
In 2015, he authored AE-
Beyond Misinformation - What Science Says
About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7.
He holds a Master of
Public Policy degree from the University of California, Berkeley.
Together, they recently published a paper titled "15
Years Later - On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses"
in the European Scientific Journal.
In it, they conclude that:
It bears repeating
that fires have never caused the total collapse of a
steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11.
Did we witness an
unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001?
The NIST reports, which
attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade
a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.
Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion
that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled
far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this
hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial
investigation by responsible authorities.
Apart from all of the
evidence presented in the paper, they also point out how more than
125 first responders were documented saying that they saw hear,
and/or felt explosions prior to and/or during the collapses.
It's also emphasized in the study that the collapse mechanics are
only a fraction of the available evidence indicating
that the airplane impacts and fires had nothing to do with the
Videos show that the
upper section of each tower disintegrated within the first four
seconds of collapse.
After that point, not
a single video shows the upper sections that purportedly
descended all the way to the ground before being crushed. Videos
and photographs also show numerous high-velocity bursts of
debris being ejected from point-like sources.
NIST refers to these
as "puffs of smoke" but fails to properly analyze them.
NIST also provides no
explanation for the midair pulverization of most of the towers'
concrete, the near-total dismemberment of their steel frames, or
the ejection of those materials up to 150 meters in all
NIST sidesteps the
well-documented presence of molten metal throughout the debris
field and asserts that the orange molten metal seen pouring out
of WTC 2 for the seven minutes before its collapse was aluminum
from the aircraft combined with organic materials.
Yet experiments have
shown that molten aluminum, even when mixed with organic
materials, has a silvery appearance - thus suggesting that the
orange molten metal was instead emanating from a
thermite reaction being used to
weaken the structure.
nano-thermitic material has
since been discovered in multiple independent WTC dust samples.