Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is November 3, 1982, and
this is my AUDIO LETTER® #80.
Beginning with this AUDIO LETTER I’m
making a small shift in my recording schedule from the end of each
month to early in the month. This change will help reduce conflicts
with holidays and other problems during the course of the year.
For years now a familiar slogan has been used in the advertisements
for a popular pain reliever. The slogan was so effective that it
helped build annual sales of nearly half a billion dollars. The pain
reliever became #1 in America with 37% of the market, and yet for
weeks now this famous slogan has been heard no more. The slogan was:
“Trust Tylenol. Hospitals do.” Literally over night, just a month
ago, Americans by the millions stopped trusting Tylenol. A number of
people in Chicago had suddenly died after taking Extra-Strength
By October 1, six were dead and a number of others gravely ill. A
few days later the death toll rose to seven. The Tylenol capsules
which they had taken had been contaminated with one of the deadliest
of all poisons, cyanide. Instantly headlines about the Tylenol
massacre pushed all other news stories into the background here in
the United States.
A nation-wide alert went out for people to stop
taking Tylenol capsules until further notice. Everyone was told to
look for two suspect batches of Tylenol, identifiable by their
serial numbers. The booming Tylenol capsule production line was shut
down. The manufacturer launched a Tylenol capsule recall program.
Many Tylenol products were withdrawn from drug store shelves, and
those that remained were shunned by frightened customers.
Thus began a news story which has remained on everyone’s tongue for
a solid month. In most cases even the most dramatic news stories
begin to loss their impact after a week or so—but not the Tylenol
scare. It has been nursed along week after week, piece by agonizing
piece like a real-life soap opera. First there were worries that the
poisoning might have been due to some horrible production-line
accident; then it was found that the deadly capsules had been
poisoned deliberately. After a week or so, new Tylenol poisoning
cases came to light in Oroville, California and in Philadelphia.
Those stories revived fears of a nation-wide poisoning threat all
over again. By mid-month the search for the Tylenol killer was
closing in on the Chicago area itself. For another week or so there
were sensational stories day after day about alleged “hot leads” in
Gradually they all fizzled out but only
after keeping the story alive a while longer. By late in October the
Tylenol scare was at last beginning to die down in its impact. But
the Tylenol massacre was made to order to spawn copycat crimes by a
few unstable individuals here and there. Those copycat crimes were
slow in coming, so the major media were enlisted to help set them
off. Time after time television news reports about the Tylenol
tragedy digressed into discussions in the “What if...?” category.
“What if the poison had been put not in Tylenol but perhaps food or
Halloween candy?” said the television voices.
Time after time they
pointed out how easy it would be to do that and get away with it.
And sure enough, suddenly it started happening. Here and there
people received eye burns from adulterated eye drops. A man ended up
in hospital after poisoning by way of a carton of chocolate milk;
and Halloween candy began showing up with poison, needles, and razor
blades. What had started as the Tylenol scare a month ago has become
an ever-widening fear of adulteration of everything we buy for food
My friends, the Tylenol massacre and all the other fears it has
spawned will fade from our minds eventually, but for now it has done
its job to perfection. That job was to take our attention away from
certain events on the international scene for now and to turn our
attention inward instead. This change was desired by the American
Bolsheviks because of their failure in September to set off NUCLEAR
WAR ONE on schedule!
For the moment the Bolsheviks here are responding by turning their
energies inward to the domestic scene more intensely than before. As
it stands right now, the Bolshevik-dominated Reagan Administration
expects to emphasize domestic matters for roughly the coming year.
They want to press forward with a quiet new Bolshevik revolution
here in America to tighten their control over you and me.
same time they also want to try to finish off their deadly rivals
for power—the Rockefeller cartel. If the Bolsheviks here can succeed
in doing these things, they will be in far better position to try
again at nuclear war. At present, my friends, the tentative plans of
the Bolsheviks here call for a new crisis sequence toward nuclear
war to begin late in 1983, and culminate in war itself in early
1984! It will take that long for the military preparations for
nuclear war to be recycled up to peak readiness.
Between now and
then, you can expect major crises to erupt overseas which may look
like they hold a threat of nuclear war in themselves; but these
interim crises over the next year or so will actually have a
different purpose. They will not be intended to lead in themselves
to nuclear war but to improve America’s geostrategic position. If
successful, this process will improve the Pentagon’s chances when it
is time for nuclear war itself.
The process of turning inward by the Bolsheviks here is a temporary
one but very important. It must be understood if you are to
understand many coming events in our economy and in politics. At the
same time, we must also keep our eye on the ball and look beyond the
temporary inward emphasis of the next year or so. And it is time for
an important update about what the Kremlin is doing in response to
all these things.
My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:
Topic #1 - AMERICA’S ECONOMIC DECLINE
INTO A NEW DARK AGES
Topic #2 - WAR COUNTDOWN TOWARD THE
ISRAELI YEAR OF DOOM
Topic #3 - CHANGING OF THE GUARD IN
THE NEW KREMLIN.
Market - 1980s/1930s
In recent weeks there’s been one seemingly bright spot in the
increasingly grim United States economy. With unemployment climbing,
bankruptcies spreading, and factories idle, the Stock Market alone
has acted cheerful. In August the prospect of dropping interest
rates became the excuse for a dramatic upturn in stock prices. Over
the past 2-1/2 months we’ve seen a series of wild swings on Wall
Street that seem to defy all logic.
Records have been set in trading
volume on one day only to be shattered by an even larger record on
another day. Several times recently the one-day jump in the Dow
Jones average has reached record levels. One of those days was
October 8, the same day that it was announced that the official
unemployment rate has reached double digits.
With unemployment at levels not seen since the Great Depression, the
Stock Market has continued to soar. Three days after the
announcement of double-digit unemployment, the Stock Market passed
the 1000 mark on the Dow Jones industrial averages. The situation we
are seeing now is described well by an article released by the
Associated Press in August.
The article begins in the words, and I
“Wall Street, which waited for years
for the recession to begin, is starting to act like the economic
downturn is just about over. Even as companies report that their
profits in the second quarter were lower than last year, the
Stock Market has continued a rally that has pushed up the Dow
Jones industrial average to its highest levels in three years.”
My friends, the article from which I
just quoted was published in August, as I said—but not August of
this year! It is dated August 3, 1980, over two years ago. At that
time the Stock Market appeared to be saying the same thing it
appears to be saying now, that better times are just ahead; but of
course better times were not ahead. The Stock Market bubble of two
years ago burst after a while, while the economy kept heading
What is going on in the Stock Market right now is just another stunt
known in some circles as a “Bear Trap.” A bear trap is an episode of
gross manipulation of the Stock Market by certain large
institutional investors to unload unwanted stocks. I first described
how a bear trap works in AUDIO LETTER No. 33 when the bear trap took
place in the spring of 1978. Another took place around the late
summer of 1980, producing the article from which I quoted earlier;
and now in the autumn of 1982 we’re watching as another Stock Market
bear trap snares its victims.
During September, and especially October, large amounts of unwanted
stocks were successfully dumped onto small investors. Instead of
setting another new record for a one-day rise in stock prices, the
Dow Jones set a more disturbing record a few days ago. On Monday
October 25 the Dow dropped more than 36 points, the largest one-day
drop since the crash of 1929. The excuse given was that suddenly
there are signs that those dropping interest rates just might head
My friends, the fact is that even a thousand (1000) on the Dow is
worth only about as much as 400 a decade ago due to inflation, and
the wildness of the ups and downs lately are a very ominous sign.
They are a symptom of instability in the Market, meaning a small
stimulus produces big effects. That is what happened to the Stock
Market in 1929, too, just before the big crash. The United States
economy is fundamentally sick, and now it is having chills and fever
as reflected by the Stock Market up-and-down jumps. The two engines
of our economy, automobiles and construction, are still running at
about half speed. In the past I’ve explained why a sustained
depression in these two areas would inevitably spread to engulf our
whole economy. And now it is happening!
Unemployment, as measured by the Government’s grossly understated
statistics, reached 10.1 per cent in September, the highest since
the Great Depression. Bankruptcies, too, have now reached a pace
unequaled since the Great Depression.
Farmers are in a tailspin with
projected farm incomes for 1982 down 24% from 1981.
Banking System Situation
And then there are the banks. The Great Depression of the 1930s
really began not with the 1929 Stock Market crash but with the
collapse of our banking system afterward. Likewise today, it is not
the chills and fever of the Stock Market that are the greatest
economic danger—it is the dangerous condition of our banks.
When I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 44 in March 1979, I reported that
the Bolsheviks here in America were going after the banks.
The Bolshevik coup d’etat against their former Rockefeller allies
had begun two months earlier with the murder of Nelson
Rockefeller; and by that March, Bolshevik moles were going to work
throughout the Rockefeller banking empire. As I reported in AUDIO
LETTER No. 44, they were starting at the top with the giant Chase
Manhattan Bank. If the American Bolsheviks can shatter Rockefeller
banking power, the Rockefeller cartel may well be doomed!
My friends, the process which I first made public in AUDIO LETTER
No. 44 is now far advanced. During the first eight months of this
year 27 banks failed here in the United States. Many others are
teetering on the edge, and on August 23 it was announced that five
of America’s largest banks are in deep trouble. They are deep in the
“red” due to the inability to collect on huge bad loans. The five
banks which were in the news that day are all members of the
Rockefeller group, and one of them is none other than Chase
The problem of bad loans now plaguing the Rockefeller banks is
destined to just keep getting worse, not better. The final crushing
blow that could bring the Rockefeller banks crashing down is the
mountain of bad loans to foreign countries. Years ago when the
Rockefeller cartel had no rival in governmental power here, those
loans were made without concern. Whenever loans went bad, they
always made sure the American taxpayer bailed them out through
various governmental devices; but now the situation has changed.
Rockefeller cartel no longer exercises sufficient power over the
whole of the United States Government to bail itself out in this
way. Instead their enemies, the Bolsheviks here, are increasingly
able to block the Rockefeller group.
This new situation was reflected in the World Economic Conference of
the World Bank and International Monetary Fund two months ago. At
the conference, which was held in Toronto, Canada, the Rockefeller
and Bolshevik factions squared off against one another—and, my
friends, the Bolsheviks won! Here is basically what happened:
Rockefeller cartel banking operatives both from America and from
abroad argued for increased quotas for the International Monetary
Fund—that is, they argued that the United States and other developed
nations should donate tens of billions of dollars to cover increased
Rockefeller spokesmen presented their arguments
in terms of the needs of the Third World nations, but what they were
really worried about was the possible consequences to their own
banks of bad loans to the Third World. Increased IMF quotas from
participating nations could have helped bail them out of trouble.
That is what the Rockefeller group tried to do by enlisting the
support of the Third World nations themselves. But the American
Bolsheviks squashed it!
Speaking in Toronto on September 6, the
entity Reagan declared:
“The United States cannot afford to
bail out the world.”
What he really meant was that America’s
Bolshevik government was not about to bail out the Rockefeller
cartel—and with that, increased IMF quotas were refused.
So now, my friends, the Rockefeller cartel banking interests face an
untenable situation. They hold vast amounts of loans to Third World
countries, and a lot of it is bunching up and coming due. During
1983 more than half trillion dollars in these loans will be coming
due. About 80 per cent of that could end up going unpaid to the
banks by financially-troubled nations. That would add up to a
combined default of more than four hundred billion dollars
($400,000,000,000). If the big banks should lose even a fraction of
that unthinkable amount, it will spell disaster for America’s entire
Very quickly the collapse will engulf the entire
international banking system as well. As major American banks
collapse, credit lines to industry will be cut off.
finance continued operations, more and more businesses will close
their doors, unemployment will mushroom, and the depression which we
already experience will grow far worse. The public will clamor for
the Government to do something—and do something it will! There will
be reflation of our currency (that is, more inflation in the depths
of depression), and sooner or later the entity President Reagan or
his successor will declare a NATIONAL ECONOMIC EMERGENCY—shades of
FDR and 1933.
There is an ironic parallel between all of this and what happened
half a century ago to trigger the Great Depression. In the early
1930s a major New York bank called the “United States Bank of New
York”, a private bank, teetered on the edge of failure. The bank
appealed for help to the Federal Reserve System, which by its
charter is supposed to be the lender of last resort; but the Federal
Reserve refused to come to its aid. The result, which was
predictable, was the failure of the United States Bank.
a chain reaction due to shared loan arrangements and other factors
which linked that bank to many others. When the United States Bank
failed, it dragged down others, which dragged down still others. The
progressive collapse of much of America’s banking system dragged
America’s whole economy downward into the Great Depression—and all
because of the deliberate inaction of the privately-owned Federal
Today the parallel to all this is taking place at the international
level. This time it is not just one bank but the whole Rockefeller
banking network that is teetering due to bad international loans. So
the bankers have appealed for help through the international analog
of the Federal Reserve System—that is, the IMF. But at the Toronto
Economic Conference the so-called Reagan Administration prevented
that aid from being given. As a result, the whole Rockefeller
banking network is heading toward almost certain disaster; and
because the linkages among banks that existed in the 1930s exist
again today, the whole banking system of America and the world is
threatened! The irony, my friends, is just this: In the 1930s it was
the Rockefeller interests who helped to bring about the banking
system collapse through their effective control of the Federal
That was how they acquired effective control of
American banking after it was rebuilt, but this time the shoe is on
the other foot! This time it is the Rockefeller bankers themselves
who want help and who face disaster because it has been denied them.
The United States is leading the world into a new depression even
worse than that of the 1930s, but there is a fundamental difference
between what happened 50 years ago and what is happening now! That
difference has to do with our currency itself.
In the 30’s, times were hard but at least our money was still stable
and valuable. It was tough to earn a dollar; but if you
did, you could buy a lot with it. Today, in the 80’s, it’s
different. The dollar is no longer stable; its value is shrinking
before our very eyes. While jobs are vanishing and wages are being
restrained, even the dollars we do earn are losing their buying
The fact is that the United States dollar is being destroyed
deliberately. It is this process of ruining our money itself that is
leading to all the other chain reactions that are plunging us into
depression. This is what I was talking about in my 1973 book, THE
CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR.
And the destructive tampering with
America’s currency is continuing—and even speeding up now!
Pending HR-7283 - $100.00 Bill
A year and a half ago in AUDIO LETTER No. 63, I revealed a
scheme was being cooked up to do away with our present $100.00 bill.
At that time the plan was still in its infancy. Since then it has
continued to evolve even though the original target date in late
1981 was not met.
On the first day of last month, October 1982, the stage began to be
set for action in Congress. A Pennsylvania Congressman, Richard
Schulze, introduced a bill which is tailor-made to Treasury
The bill is designated HR-7283, and has
the following long-winded title:
TO PROVIDE FOR THE RETIREMENT OF ALL
UNITED STATES NOTES OF THE DENOMINATION OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100.00) AND THEIR REPLACEMENT WITH NEW NOTES OF SUCH
As the title implies, the present
version of the scheme embodies one noticeable difference from that
which I reported a year and a half ago. Originally the plan was to
suddenly repudiate the $100.00 bill altogether. Now the plan is
instead to take away the present hundreds but replace them with
new-issue hundreds that look radically different. This refinement in
tactics makes the plan look a little different, but it will still
accomplish all of the original objectives.
To see how little the plan has really changed in the past year and a
half, one need only look at the bill now before Congress, HR-7283.
The original secret plan required that the present $100.00 bill be
declared illegal tender. Likewise, subsection © of the bill in
Congress says, quote:
“Such notes shall cease to be legal
tender on a date to be determined by the Secretary.”
The original secret plan called for
holders of $100.00 bills to be given a brief turn-in period before
they became worthless, and now HR-7283 says in subsection ©, quote:
“The Secretary shall provide for a
ten-day period during which holders of circulating United States
Notes of $100.00 to be retired may exchange such notes for
A key aspect of the original secret plan
was that anyone turning in more than a modest amount of hundreds
would become automatic targets of suspicion. Your name, address, and
Social Security number were to be taken for investigation; and sure
enough, here is what HR-7283 now says in subsection ©, quote:
“In any case in which any one holder
exchanges $100.00 notes in the value of $5,000.00 or more, a
record of the name, address, and Social Security or federal
employee identification number shall be recorded and forwarded
to the Department of the Treasury.”
Subsection (d) then says that this
information will be provided, quote:
“...to federal, state, and local law
enforcement agencies for use in criminal investigation or
The excuses being given for all of this
are still following the secret plan I made public a year and a half
ago. In AUDIO LETTER No. 63 I reported that the $100.00 bill ploy
would be justified as an attack on crime and inflation. When
Congressman Schulze introduced the bill on October 1, he followed
the Treasury script to the letter.
In his remarks printed that day
in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Schulze said, quote:
“The purpose of this bill is to aid
law enforcement officials in the fight against drug trafficking
and other crime. A side benefit would be the reduction in volume
of dollars in the underground economy.”
But, my friends, the true purposes of
the Treasury-inspired $100.00 bill stratagem are far different from
those claimed. It is actually a power play aimed partly at you and
me and partly at the enemy of the Bolsheviks, the Rockefeller
cartel! The excuses of attacking crime and inflation are only a
means to an end to close down America.
To help protect yourself and your family in these very difficult
times, I have outlined what you can do in my book, THE CONSPIRACY
AGAINST THE DOLLAR. It is still good advice today. The main point is
that you have most of your assets abroad in hard currencies, not
dollars; and also you should consider the Currency Hedge Funds in
the Common Market which help you to beat inflation.
My friends, our money system is being corrupted and destroyed. The
result is a progressive, irreversible disintegration of our economy
of a kind that did not happen in the 30’s. We are slipping backward
in the direction of the Dark Ages. Honest, stable money is essential
to civilization itself. In primitive cultures there is no money;
everything is done by barter. That works only for very simple
societies. The standardized medium of exchange known as “money” is
essential in order to make transactions more flexible and easy. It
opens the way for individuals to specialize more according to their
skills. With specialization comes diversity, breakthroughs, and
advancement of civilization itself.
All that starts coming apart
when money becomes a manipulated, unstable, dishonest commodity. The
most dramatic and most ominous sign that a society’s money is
becoming useless is the reappearance of barter. It means that the
society’s normal medium of exchange—money—is not working. Today
barter systems are spreading like wildfire across America; and as it
does, our civilization itself is disintegrating.
Our rulers’ greed
for power is now leading us all toward a new Dark Ages.
- For several years now the nuclear
strategy of the United States has been a first-strike strategy. Top
Pentagon military strategists are preparing actively for nuclear war
with Russia, and they intend for America to strike first.
It was not always this way; in fact, America’s shift onto a first
strike posture is a new development in American history.
This is true even though America’s leaders have repeatedly gotten
America into war deliberately. The difference is that in the past
America was always dragged into war by at least appearing to be
attacked first. That enabled American public opinion to be rallied
behind the desired war against the chosen enemy. This approach has
always been necessary because most Americans would never support a
war that they knew to be America’s fault.
involvement in falsely defensive wars began as long ago as 1898. On
February 15 of that year the American battleship Maine was resting
peacefully at anchor in the harbor of Havana, Cuba. Suddenly a giant
explosion rocked the ship and it blew apart. Some 260 American
fighting men aboard the ship lost their lives. To the cry of
“Remember the Maine” America went off to war. Afterward overwhelming
evidence was found that the Spaniards had not been responsible for
the Maine disaster; instead, American saboteurs had done the deed in
order to bring on the desired war. But by the time those facts began
to surface quietly, most Americans were not paying attention.
were just too pleased with ourselves for having crushed Spain and
become suddenly a global power.
In 1941 America’s leaders were spoiling for an even bigger war than
America had ever fought before. The reasons had to do with Saudi
Arabian oil, first and foremost, as I have detailed in the past. The
Rockefeller Standard Oil interests had been locked out of the
Persian Gulf by British boycott tactics. To cure that problem, the
Rockefeller cartel had helped create a threat to Britain in the form
of Adolf Hitler.
By 1940 the threat was doing its job. The Battle of Britain was
underway, and Churchill was finally willing to come to terms. If the
United States would intervene and stop Hitler, then after the war
America could have the Saudi oil.
To carry out the bargain, FDR and his Rockefeller sponsors had to
get America into war somehow. But most Americans did not want war;
the only way to change our minds about that was to arrange for
America to be attacked. The Germans were in no position to do that,
but Japan was; and Japan, Germany, and Italy were inseparably linked
through the Tripartite Treaty; so if Japan could be lured into
attacking the United States, we would also be at war with Germany
automatically. As a bonus, this strategy also promised great new
gains for the United States in the Pacific itself.
The solution, of
course, was Pearl Harbor. When FDR called it a “Day of Infamy”, he
was right. Roosevelt himself and other top American leaders were
guilty of high treason for their role in setting up the Pearl Harbor
I have given many details about this in
past AUDIO LETTERS including Nos. 1, 14, 22, and 34. Just in recent
months, four decades after the fact, pieces of the story have
started to leak out and become more widely known. For example, a
book was published recently by the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian
John Toland entitled “INFAMY—PEARL HARBOR AND ITS AFTERMATH.” In the
book he documents the fact that FDR and his top military leaders had
plenty of advance warning of the attack, and yet no warning was
given to the forces at Pearl Harbor! Why?
Because FDR wanted the
Japanese attack to succeed. The deliberate sacrifice of more than
2,000 American Servicemen’s lives was just the right medicine to
cure America’s anti-war attitude. To the cries of “Remember Pearl
Harbor”, we Americans went off to war to win Saudi oil for the
Rockefeller oil cartel!
Once again today’s rulers of the United States are trying to get
America into another big war; but this time they dare not
allow the enemy, Russia, to strike first as was done at Pearl Harbor
by Japan. America’s rulers in 1941 could afford the
luxury of throwing away a big chunk of naval power in the Pearl
Harbor attack. There was no chance that Japan could go on to
actually defeat the United States with its enormous industrial
might, but today it’s different.
Today the luxury of time is gone. If the weapons are not ready when
war begins, they cannot be built in time to help; and even more
importantly, the intended enemy today is far more powerful
militarily than the United States! And so today’s top Pentagon
strategists are first-strike oriented. In any military campaign, he
who strikes the first blow always has the advantage. If the first
blow is also a surprise, the advantage is tremendous because of all
factors of military strategy, surprise is the most important.
Just six weeks ago on September 17 the United States came within
hours of actually launching a surprise nuclear first strike against
Russia. It was the culmination of a hurry-up war plan about which I
first began reporting last February in AUDIO LETTER No. 72. The
struggle over this war plan spawned major headlines this year. These
included the Falklands War last spring and the sudden forced
resignation of Secretary of State Alexander Haig last June. The plan
suffered repeated setbacks and yet it stayed on schedule. It was
only during the final two weeks or so that the so-called “PROJECT Z”
war plan finally fell apart too far to proceed.
The critical events
which brought this about were a policy change in Red China, Russian
military action in space, and limited public exposure at the last
minute. I detailed all this a month ago in AUDIO LETTER No. 79. The
war planners here were frustrated this time, my friends, but they
came very close to succeeding. Having come that close, they are
convinced they will succeed on the next attempt, and so they already
have a new war plan underway. Under this new plan, preliminary
preparations and crises are scheduled for about the coming year.
Then in late 1983 they presently expect to begin a new final-crisis
sequence to lead into nuclear war itself in early 1984.
The new war plan was set in motion on September 14, three days
before the abortive end of “PROJECT Z.” The Israeli plan to murder
Lebanese President-elect Bashir Gemayel, which I had made public the
previous month, was carried out. That provided the excuse for the
Israelis to invade Beirut and quickly arrange for a mass murder of
Palestinian civilian refugees. The real pay-off of all this was the
return of American Marines to Beirut in the beginning of a new and
open-ended deployment in Lebanon. In AUDIO LETTERS Nos. 78 and 79 I
reported that the Marines had been sent there to become the focus of
a major incident.
This will come about under the joint plan of the
Bolshevik-controlled United States Pentagon and the Israeli Mossad.
The Mossad is to arrange for a number of our Marines to be killed in
an incident that will be blamed on the Arabs! This will be used to
inflame American public opinion to help lead us into war, including
ultimately nuclear war. It is to be a replay of the strategy used in
1898 with the battleship Maine. Already our psychological
conditioning for this planned incident to come is underway. Just two
days ago a car bomb exploded close to a Marine position in the south
There were no serious injuries this time because there
were not meant to be any, but the atmosphere of danger to our
leathernecks is being dramatized. At the same time the Government is
starting to talk about sending in more Marines, many more, perhaps
up to 5,000; and those who are already in Lebanon are gradually
fanning out into more and more dangerous duty areas.
All of this was set in motion in spite of blunt Russian warnings.
This was accomplished by carrying out the Beirut Massacre; but the
massacre also had a dangerous side effect in the form of world-wide
condemnation of Israel.
Throughout the latter half of September the reaction to the Beirut
Massacre was building fast, especially among the public of Israel
and America. Within Israel itself, ways were available to maneuver
the protests and keep them from getting out of control. But here in
the United States it was essential to snuff out the reaction to the
massacre very quickly otherwise it could have done real damage to
the Bolshevik-Zionist junta that runs the American and Israeli
military machine. People were beginning to question America’s blind
support for Israel’s military power. In order to blot out the Beirut
Massacre from American minds, a second massacre was perpetrated
barely two weeks later. It was the Tylenol Massacre.
The specter of
over a thousand rotting bodies in far-off Beirut were quickly
forgotten in the scare over those seven deaths in Chicago.
For most Americans, the Tylenol scare just blanked out everything
else. It was an evil masterpiece of psychological trickery. Most of
us find it hard to identify with what happened in Beirut, but we can
certainly identify with a person taking a headache pill. One story
had to do with a lot of foreign people in far-off land; the other
had to do with what was portrayed as a threat to each of us
As I discussed in my introduction, the Tylenol story stayed on the
front page for a solid month, all through October. Now, finally,
there is starting to be some renewed emphasis of the Beirut tragedy
in the news. We are hearing about eye witnesses to the slaughter who
have contradicted Defense Minister Sharon’s claim that the Israelis
could not see the killing. But now the psychological danger point is
passed for the Israelis. It’s now “old news” to most people. No
matter what comes out now, it will have almost no chance of
interfering with the ongoing war plans.
The Reagan Bolsheviks and
the Begin Zionists are looking ahead to next year, but in doing so
the Israeli cabinet has suddenly noticed something that makes their
blood run cold. It is right there on the Hebrew lunar calendar which
uses Hebrew letters instead of numbers to designate the year. For
the next Jewish New Year, my friends, those letters spell the word
The Begin cabinet is reacting to this
discovery as if the finger of God had appeared and written that word
“doom” on the wall of the Knesset—and no wonder, because they have
blood on their hands. The present Jewish New Year began with the
Beirut Massacre carried out under the authority of the Begin
cabinet, but the militant Zionists in Israel are reacting as they
always react when confronted with unwelcome facts. They never
consider changing their own ways, instead their solution is, in
their own words, “to create new facts.”
And that is how they are
trying to erase that word “doom” from their calendar. On October 22
a resolution was passed before the Begin cabinet to change the
designation of the next New Year by rearranging the letters. The
American Bolsheviks and their Israeli Zionist allies are starting a
lengthy process of recycling their war plans for another try. One
factor in this new process is Bolshevik intrigue to try to set off
war between India and Pakistan. In AUDIO LETTER No. 78 I reported
that this war was targeted for this month, November 1982, if
“PROJECT Z” did not succeed first.
The key to war between India and Pakistan is the disputed territory
between them of Kashmir. Kashmir has been held together in relative
stability since 1975 by Sheik Mohammad Abdullah, known as the “Lion
of Kashmir.” But about five months ago Abdullah started having a
series of heart attacks. The heart attacks, my friends, were not
natural. Finally two months ago on September 8 he succumbed to one
of these attacks. Abdullah’s removal from the scene has helped start
setting the stage for the Indo-Pakistani war I warned about in
August, but the Russians know what is afoot and they are advising
India’s leader, Indira Gandhi, to defuse the situation.
As a result,
she invited Pakistan’s General Zia to New Delhi for talks on
improving relations. Zia arrived there two days ago, met with Mrs.
Gandhi, and left a group of diplomats to talk further. Whether all
this will prevent the war is an open question, but at least it
should help slow down the Bolshevik intrigues.
The process of recycling for another
war-try involves many aspects of the total military picture. For one
thing the Bolshevik Pentagon war planners hope to rebuild some
semblance of their secret weapons reserves. I first reported on
their existence and role in the intended nuclear war in AUDIO LETTER
No. 73. These were the real reason for the Southern Hemisphere war
last spring of which the Falklands War was only the visible part. I
can now report that the Bolshevik-controlled secret naval facilities
were not destroyed even though they were put out of action.
program is now underway to repair the damage, both at South Georgia
Island and at the two southern New Zealand sites. As I reported in
AUDIO LETTER No. 74, a portion of the Bolshevik Stealth Navy escaped
altogether from the hostilities. Another aspect of the Pentagon’s
recycling process has to do with America’s newly deployed secret
Stealth Planes, called “Phantom War Planes.”
These have yet to be tested in combat
but they are believed to be capable of successfully attacking
Russia; but due to the sudden change in China’s policies in early
September, the crucial Sinkiang Province launch area is presently
unavailable. Should it still be unavailable a year from now, the
Pentagon is determined to have the next best back-up site ready to
go. That back-up site, my friends, is none other than Kashmir, the
disputed area between India and Pakistan.
It is far inferior to
Sinkiang Province, China, being nearly twice as far away from
Russia’s Cosmosphere bases, but it is still better than anything
else, so don’t be surprised if Pakistan goes ahead and attacks India
to seize Kashmir within the next year, talks or no talks.
The Space Shuttle Missions
And then there is
the space shuttle. As I’ve detailed in past
tapes, the space shuttle is the indispensable key to the Pentagon’s
plans to use space for the coming nuclear war. All 4 space shuttle
missions up to now have been military missions, described to the
public as “test flights.” Now space shuttle launch #5 is about to
take place, scheduled for November 11, just a few days from now. Now
the alleged test schedule has been used up.
In order to preserve appearances, there is no choice but to start
following through now with some launches of civilian payloads. That
is what space shuttle #5 now on the pad at Cape Canaveral will be
doing. For the first time there will be no military payload on this
shuttle. For that reason, on this flight we will probably get to see
what is actually happening during the mission.
Space shuttle #5 will be a “first” in other ways, too. The first
four flights used a skeleton crew of only two astronauts. This time
there are four—Allen, Brand, Overmyer, and Lanoir—three of whom are
But the most important “first” for space shuttle #5 will be one that
is totally unsuspected by the public. My friends, this will be the
first mission to use just one shuttle from start to finish.
The first four missions used the two-shuttle stratagem which I first
made public in AUDIO LETTER No. 62. Each time we watched a shuttle
with the name “Columbia” on the side take off from Florida. Once in
orbit, the plan called for the astronauts to carry out their
military mission while the public was shown falsified space movies
about the flight.
Then the two-man crew was to return to Earth, not
aboard the shuttle itself but aboard a two-man re-entry capsule. The
shuttle itself, if possible, was to return to Earth unmanned,
landing by computer-control in western Australia. Finally, back on
Earth, the two astronauts boarded a different shuttle with the name
“Columbia” on the side. It was boosted to high speed and then glided
to Earth for the public to watch. But this time it will be
This time it is a non-military mission and there are four
astronauts, too many to fit into a re-entry capsule.
The shuttle which takes off from Florida
will have to land in California five days later. The NASA military
shuttle managers believe there will be no trouble from Russia on
this flight. It is purely non-military, and this shuttle is unarmed;
but there is still one major worry. That worry, my friends, is just
this: Will the thermal tiles really work? No one knows because no
space shuttle has ever reentered from orbital velocity before.
four of the shuttles we have watched blast off from Florida have
been destroyed in space by Russian space weapons before they could
return to Earth, so space shuttle #5 will actually make the first
test of the tiles. NASA believes that the tiles will hold. If they
do, the landing at Edwards Air Force Base on November 16 will look
just like the four fake landings we have seen up to now. If the
tiles do not work, four astronauts may pay with their lives for the
NASA deception up to now.
Even so, having falsified four allegedly
successful landings, NASA will find a way to explain it away if
space shuttle #5 should end in disaster, because a year from now the
space shuttle will be needed to start preparing for war once again.
- On Wednesday October 27 the man known
as President Leonid Brezhnev delivered a speech of major importance
in Moscow. The speech came on the heels of a surprise conference of
all Warsaw Pact Foreign Ministers convened in Moscow just five days
earlier. The importance of the Brezhnev speech was emphasized in
every way possible.
Brezhnev was flanked on the podium by his five
senior colleagues in the Politburo, and his audience of more than
500 consisted of the entire upper crust of the giant Soviet military
establishment. Present were all top Defense Ministry officials, all
Soviet Marshals, the Commanders of all the Russian military
services, all regional Soviet Commanders, the Commanders of Soviet
forces abroad, and the top echelon of the Policy Directorate of the
The Brezhnev speech was directed first and foremost to the Military
and to the Russian technological establishment which backs them up,
but it was also directed to the entire Soviet public and was
broadcast in its entirety over nation-wide television.
In his speech Brezhnev accused the United States of trying to bring
about nuclear war. He said that America’s leaders have, quote:
“...raised the intensity of their
military preparations to an unprecedented level.”
And he accused the so-called Reagan
Administration of, and I quote again:
“...an aggressive policy which is
threatening to push the world into the flames of nuclear war.”
My friends, Government and major media
spokesmen always try to lead us Americans to discount all
accusations like that by Russian leaders, but those harsh words of
October 27 in Moscow were not just rhetoric, far from it. Brezhnev
was referring to the Pentagon’s “PROJECT Z” nuclear strike plan
which came within hours of execution just six weeks ago!
Brezhnev even alluded to the superweapon aspect of the present war
threat. America’s radically new Phantom Warplanes are designed to
nullify Russia’s ability to stave off an attack with her beam
Brezhnev assessed the situation in the words:
“Competition in military technology
has sharply intensified, often acquiring a fundamentally new
And he exhorted Russia’s technologists
to find the solutions to the threat.
The Brezhnev speech was most notable for the change of policy which
it revealed. For 18 years now the Brezhnev image has been associated
with detente, but in this speech all that was virtually abandoned,
devalued. Aside from one brief passing reference, no hope was held
out for reviving detente with America’s rulers. Instead, the whole
thrust of the speech was that the Russian people must prepare
militarily for the days ahead. It was not a saber-rattling speech
directed at America; it was a call to arms directed to his own
My friends, the significance of this major change in stated policy
can hardly be overstated. It reflects two very important
One of the developments that led to the Brezhnev speech is the
Kremlin’s assessment of the inevitability of NUCLEAR WAR ONE. As I
have reported on past occasions, Russia’s new anti-Bolshevik rulers
know their old Bolshevik enemies only too well. Having ousted the
Bolsheviks from control of Russia, the new Kremlin now is confronted
by a Bolshevik-controlled American military. The Russians are
convinced that the Bolsheviks will just keep trying to set off
nuclear war until they finally succeed, and “PROJECT Z” was such a
close call in September that the Russians are not optimistic that
they can stop the next attempt.
The second development that led to the Brezhnev speech of October 27
is that a changing of the guard is underway in the Kremlin. It’s not
a power struggle in the old Bolshevik sense of intrigue and
infighting; instead, it’s an orderly succession among a tightly-knit
group of men who are convinced that Russia must prepare for action,
and they want to take advantage of the lull right now while the
Bolsheviks here regroup in the wake of the “PROJECT Z” failure in
The Russian people are being prepared for the end of the Brezhnev
era in the very near future. For the very first time ever
preparations are underway for a Soviet leader to peacefully and
voluntarily retire with honors. It will be just one more step in the
new Kremlin’s gradual step-by-step program of changing the rules of
life in Russia.
In one sense the so-called Brezhnev retirement will only be a
ceremonial fiction; the real Brezhnev died of complications from
Russian flu on January 7, 1978. I first reported his incapacitation
and replacement by a ceremonial “double” in AUDIO LETTER No. 30.
Later, in AUDIO LETTER No. 33, I was able to report the date of his
death. Since that time several doubles have been employed to
maintain the Brezhnev image until the time was ripe for change. That
time, my friends, has now arrived. During the interim since the real
Brezhnev’s death, a succession of several men have held the reins of
top power in Russia. First there was Defense Minister Ustinov,
leader of the “White Doves.”
Then it was the head of the Soviet
Navy, Admiral Gorshkov. Next, power was shared among several men,
but none of these men could truly fill the shoes of the departed
Brezhnev, and the search for more effective leadership has
Now, my friends, that search is at an
The new ruler of Russia is already taking the reins of power right
now. It may be some time yet before his true role becomes publicly
visible, but his mark is already being stamped on Russian policies.
It was he more than anyone else who was the architect of the
startling Brezhnev speech, so called, of October 27. Russia’s new
top ruler spent 15 years as head of Russia’s world-wide Intelligence
service, the KGB.
When he took charge in 1967 his task was to
transform the KGB by rooting out all Bolshevik power over it. His
success in doing so helped set the stage for the final overthrow of
the Bolsheviks from Kremlin power in 1976 and 1977. Now he has been
chosen to become the top leader of the Soviet Union. The name of
Russia’s new leader is Yuri Andropov. Right now that name may be
unfamiliar to you, but I urge you to start watching for it in the
Directly or indirectly we will be hearing more and more from
Andropov from this time forward.
LAST MINUTE SUMMARY
Now it’s time for my Last Minute Summary. In this AUDIO LETTER I’ve
tried to give you some perspective on the probable direction of
events over the next year or so.
The Bolsheviks here failed to set off their nuclear war plan in
September so now they are recycling for another try in a year or so.
Meanwhile they are turning inward to tighten their grip on America
itself through economic means. At the same time the Russians, too,
are taking advantage of this breather for a changing of the guard in
They are preparing for action with a new strong leader
at the helm.
Here in America the destruction of our currency is continuing with
the $100.00 bill now targeted for special attack. By this economic
route the civilization of America itself is being undermined. Over
the course of generations we Americans have been lured to worship
the so-called “almighty dollar”, so we have come under the spell of
those who have made the dollar corrupt as a tool of power.
In the last analysis, the most basic cause of our deepening economic
crisis is something our Lord Jesus Christ tried to warn us about
long ago. He said we cannot serve two masters, both God and
mammon—either we will love one or we will cling to he other.
Today America as a whole is clinging to mammon and forgetting God!
If that does not change, my friends, the ages ahead will be dark
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter.
Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.